Language selection

Search

Patent 2044138 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2044138
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF WINE WITHOUT THE ADDITION OF SULPHUR PRODUCTS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE PRODUCTION DE VIN SANS ADDITION DE PRODUITS SULFURES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12G 1/02 (2006.01)
  • C12F 3/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HIESINGER, EDWIN (Austria)
  • HIESINGER, EDWIN (Austria)
(73) Owners :
  • EDWIN HIESINGER
  • EDWIN HIESINGER
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1990-10-15
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-04-19
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AT1990/000100
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1991005846
(85) National Entry: 1991-06-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2392/89 (Austria) 1989-10-18

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT
In a process for making wine without the addition of sulphur
products, must is extracted in the usual way from pressed grapes;
this must is then de-slimed or clarified as required, and
fermentation is initiated, if necessary by warming the must
and/or by adding yeast and/or by mixing a must that is already
fermenting into the new must, when the fermented product is then
processed further without the ingress of air. In place of
sulphur products, products that contain starch, such as products
from grape pips, preferably grape-pip meal, and elements of the
grapes that protect against oxidation, preferably anthocyaninines
and/or anthocyanogenes, are added before, during, or after
fermentation in order to prevent browning or oxidation.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


PATENT CLAIMS
1. A process for making wine without the addition of sulphur
products in which must is extracted in the usual way from
pressed grapes, this must then being de-slimed or clarified
as required, and fermentation initiated, if necessary by
warming the must and/or by adding yeast and/or by mixing a
must that is already fermenting into the new must, when the
fermented product is then processed further without the
ingress of air, characterized in that in place of sulphur
products, products that contain starch, such as products
from grape pips, preferably grape-pip meal, and elements of
the grapes that protect against oxidation, such as
anthocyanines and/or anthocyanogenes, are added before,
during, or after fermentation in order to prevent browning
or oxidation.
2. A process as defined in claim 1, characterized in that the
products that contain starch or the grape parts that protect
against oxidation can be absorbed by the grape juice during
preparation of the mash and/or preparation of the must by
breaking the grape pips.
3. A process as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in
that dried and ground grape skins and/or dried husks are
added as the elements of the grape that protect against
oxidation.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2 ~
The present invention relates to a process for producing wine
without the addition of sulphur products; in this proce~s, must
is extracted from pressed grapes in the usual way; this must is
then deslimed or settled, as required, and fermentation is
initiated, if necessary by heating the must and/or by the
addition of yeast and/or by mixing the must with a must that is
already fermenting; the fermented product is then further
processed whilst preventing the ingress of air.
In conventional processes that are used to make wine, the maximum
guantities of sulphurous acid that may be added to the wine are
prescribed by law.
The sulphur that is added functions mainly to prevent oxidation
that can have an adverse affect on the colour, bouquet, or taste
of the wine.
The journal Die Weinwirtschaft [Wine Management], No. 14, 1976;
p. 33~, asserts that it is not possible to make wine without
adding sulphurous acid.
Das Weinblatt [The Wine News], No. 12, 1962; p. 241, asserts that
the addition of lactic acid bacteria to mature wines initiates
the biological breakdown of acid; however, sulphur is added in
the course of this process as well.
FR-A-2540 155 describes a wine-making process that does not
include the addition of sulphurous acid; in this, the yeast that
is contained in the wine assumes the reducing function sf the
sulphurous acid, the wine being separated from the yeast only
when the biological breakdown of the acid has been completed.
However, this process could not completely prevent the oxidation
of the wine.
.: ~ . . : ' '
,~,
.
,

2 0 ~
US-A3,826,849 proposes that, in order to improve the quality of
low-grade wines, the grape ~kins and pips be separated from the
mash, the pips be separated from the grape skins, after which the
grape skins are ground and then added to the fermenting must once
again.
It is the task of the present invention to produce a wine without
adding any sulphur products, using natural substances of the
grape vine and, while keeping to the usual course of the procéss,
avoiding any measures that could have an adverse effect on the
quality of the wine, which would include, in particular,
preventing contact with the air.
According to the present invention, this task has been solved in
that, in place of sulphur products, products that contain starch,
such as products of grape pips, preferably grape-pip meal, and
those elements of the grapes that provide protection against
oxidation, preferably anthocyanine and/or anthocyanogene, are
added before, during, or after fermentation in order to prevent
browning or oxidation.
Example:
Preferably, healthy wine grapes are pressed, the must is improved
as required, a culture of biologically pure yeast i5 added to it,
and then it is refined (cleared) with bentonite that is added at
the rate of 1-5 g/l. Bentonite clearing is not required in the
case of dark red wine, and in the case of light red wine, 1-3 g
are required. In the case of white wines, 1-5 g~l are added.
Commercially available bentonite can be used. However, it has
been found advantageous to use bentonites that can swell a great
deal. The subsequent fermentation is so ef~ected that no over-
heating takes place.

Since these young wines are very cloudy, it is recommended that
the process be continued as follows: centrifuying, filteriny
through diatomaceous earth, and bacteria-free ~iltering with and
in sterilized equipment and containers, and with the pri~r
introduction of CO2 through all pipes, machinery, and containers
so as to prevent the ingress o~ air. Should a natural breakdown
of the acids be desired, the wine is s~ettled, as discussed above,
after the breakdown of the acid. The wine that is now contained
in the tank is then treated as follows: C2 iS added to white
wines at a rate of at least 2 g~l. No CO2 is added to red wines
and rosees.
Six l-litre bottles are then filled with wine that has been
stored in this way and laboratory methods are used to determine
what ~uantities of products that contain starch, such as grape-
pip meal and vegetable matter, such as dried and ground grape
skins and/or dried and ground pip husks, with a high percentage
of anthocyanogenes and/or anthocyanenes, are required. The
following quantities were used in this first test of
clarification:
in the first bottle: 1 g grape-pip meal per litre
in the second bottle: 2 g grape-pip meal per litre
in the third bottle: 3 g grape-pip meal per litre
in the fourth bottle: 4 g grape-pip meal per litre
in the fifth bottle: 5 g grape-pip meal per litre
in the sixth bottle: 6 g or more grape-pip meal per litre
After three days at the earliest to a week, 1/16 litre from each
bottle was exposed to daylight/sunlight. After a few days of
such exposure, a browning reaction occurred only in those samples
that contained too little grape-pip meal.
The wine in the remaining samples, which showed no browning, is
filtered and subjected to a further test of clarificatlon.
,~ :
'

3 8
When this was done, the followiny w~re added:
in the first bottle 1 g ground grape skin and/or ground pip
husks
in the second bottle 3 g " " "
in the third bottle 5 g " " "
in the fourth bottle 7 g " " " or more.
After at the earliest 3 day~ to a week l/16 litre from each
bottle was exposed to daylight/sunlight.
After the third day, th~ taste and odour associated with
oxidation (of Sherry) could be detected in those samples that
contained too little of the ground grape skins and/or ground pip
husks. For this reason, the sample that contains the smallest
quantities of additives and which has an unaffected taste is the
best samplè.
These laboratory tests can also be carried out in the reverse
sequence, which is to say that one starts with the addition of
ground grape skins or ground pip husks and then adds the grape-
pip meal to the second sample.
The wine within the tank is to be treated in accordance with the
quantities established in this manner. After treatment in the
tank, in which the grape-pip meal and the ground grape skins or
pip husks are added to the wine either separately or togethar,
after a week at the earliest, a further test (browining test,
window test) is to be carried out; this involves exposing a clear
glass that is half full of wine and which is covered only to
prevent the ingress of dirt, not the ingress of air, to daylight
(in a window) for 10 - 72 hours. I
Experience has shown that the wine is now stable, which is to say
that it no longer turns brown and do~s not take on any odour or
taste of oxidation. However, should the result of this
~ ~ .
:~ ` ' '.,-"` ., :: :, ' ' ` :

3 8
additional test of the wine taken from the tank be negative,
laboratory tests are to be resumed.
~s soon as the wine in the tank is stable, it is to be ~iltered
into the next tank in a manner that ensures that it is free pf
~acteria. This wine must be placed in bottles or other
containers, as far as possible in such a manner as to prevent it
coming into contact with the air. The containers and the
stoppers that are to be used, like all the other equipment,
machinery, and hoses that are used during the filling and closing
processes, must be sterile or else sterilized prior to the start
of the filling process. During this cold-sterilized filling
process it must be ensured that of air within the containers is
replaced by CO2. During the closing process, it must al60 be
ensured that the sterile stoppers are not exposed to bacterial
contamination during the closing process. The filling machinery
is to be charged with CO2 before and/or when the containers are
filled. In the same way, any filling tank is to be sterilized
and filled with C2 prior to being filled with the wine product.
A filter that will ensure bacterial-free filtration is installed
between the filling tank and the filling machinery. The wine
that is the filling tank should be filled into the containers as
soon as possible in order to avoid protracted storage in the
filling tank. It must also be ensured that there is no adverse
effect on the wine within the filling tank and in the filled
containers that is caused by improper storage temperature.
This wine can also be used to make fortified wines, dessert
wines, as well as for sparkling wines. When this is done, it
must once again be rendered free of bacteria.
Because of the fact that it is not possible to preclude
injurious effects on health caused by the addition of sulphur
during the production of wine, even if the legally permitted
maximum quantities are not exceeded, the process according to the
,
,.' , ~

1 3 8
present invention entails a significant advant.age with~ut
prejudicing the quality of the wine.
A wine that has been treated by the process according to the
present invention, a Blauer burgunder 1987 was commended by the
North Austrian Provincial Chamber of Agriculture on the occasion
of the Krems Wine Show that was held in Krems (Austria) in 1988
and was accepted for the group of Aust.ria's 200 best wines (the
Austrian Wine Salon).

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2044138 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1994-04-17
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1994-04-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1993-10-15
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1993-10-15
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-04-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1993-10-15

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1992-10-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EDWIN HIESINGER
EDWIN HIESINGER
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1991-04-19 1 20
Claims 1991-04-19 1 34
Abstract 1991-04-19 1 23
Drawings 1991-04-19 1 12
Descriptions 1991-04-19 6 213
Fees 1992-09-23 1 34
Fees 1992-10-01 1 19