Language selection

Search

Patent 2044758 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2044758
(54) English Title: METHOD OF SURFACE FINISHING ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICES
(54) French Title: METHODE DE FINITION DE SURFACE D'IMPLANTS ORTHOPEDIQUE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61L 27/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SHETTY, H. RAVINDRANATH (United States of America)
  • HISS, JOHN H. (United States of America)
  • GREIG, KEVIN M. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2004-04-27
(22) Filed Date: 1991-06-17
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-12-18
Examination requested: 1998-06-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A surface treatment process for stainless steel orthopedic
implant devices and an orthopedic implant device surface treated
in accordance with the disclosed process are disclosed. A rough
ground or machined stainless steel part is shot blasted with
stainless steel shot. The device is then shot blasted with glass
beads having a nominal size of between one-tenth and one-half
that of the stainless steel shot. Electropolishing and
passivation follow the shot blasting steps. A part thus treated
includes a heavily cold-worked outer layer that enhances the
fatigue properties of the stainless steel orthopedic implant
device.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS:
1. A method of manufacturing an orthopaedic implant
device having enhanced fatigue properties, comprising the
steps of: providing a metal substrate in the form of an
orthopaedic implant device with an outer surface; shot
blasting said outer surface of said metal substrate with
metal shot having a nominal size within the range of
0.0070 to 0.0280 inch until a distinct cold-worked outer
layer is formed on said metal substrate, said cold-worked
outer layer having a textured outer surface; shot
blasting said textured outer surface of said cold-worked
outer layer with glass bead shot having a nominal size
less than the nominal size of the steel shot after shot
blasting with said metal shot is completed; and
electropolishing said textured outer surface.
2. The method of Claim 1 in which said metal substrate
is a stainless steel alloy.
3. The method of Claim 2 in which said step of shot
blasting with metal shot is performed using cold-worked
stainless steel shot.
4. The method of Claim 1 in which the metal substrate
is 22-13-5 stainless steel.
5. The method of Claim 1 in which said metal substrate
is 316L stainless steel.
12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


244"~~~
ZM0143
H. Ravi Shetty
METHOD OF SURFACE FINISHING ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT DEVICES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to stainless steel
orthopedic implant devices and, more particularly, to a surface
treatment process applicable to such devices, wherein both the
fatigue and, corrosion properties of an orthopedic implant device
are enhanced.
More specifically, the present invention relates to
orthopedic implant devices commonly used by orthopedic surgeons
to repair and replace fractured and deteriorating bones and
joints. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,612,920, issued to Lower,
discloses a compression hip screw of the general type to which
the surface treatment process of the present invention is
applicable. Other orthopedr~c devices that the present invention
would be applicable to include, but are not limited to, hip
prostheses, bone plates, intramedullary nails, and other fracture
fixation devices fabricated from stainless steel.
Representative of the function of many orthopedic implant
devices, the aforementioned compression hip screw rigidly
connects a femoral head to the remaining portion of the femur
despite a fracture in the area of the femur neck. During a
normal walking cycle, substantial loads are imparted to and
transferred by the compression hip screw. Consequently, it is
desirable to reduce the possibility of a component failure that
might require the patient to undergo further surgery.
A variety of stainless steel alloys are used for fracture
fixation devices and are chosen on the basis of their high
strength, ductility, fracture toughness, biocompatibility, and
corrosion resistance. It is generally known that the fatigue and
corrosion properties of orthopedic implant devices fabricated

CA 02044758 2002-12-13
from these alloys can be affected by different surface treatment
processes. For instance, one such process includes the steps of
mechanical grinding, sisal buffing or color buffing,
electropolishing, and passivation.
Recently, orthopedic implant devices have been surface
treated by shot blasting with alumina, i.e., a form of aluminum
oxide having a hard crystalline structure. Alumina is typically
used as an abrasive and includes a sharp, irregular surface.
Shot blasted alumina tends to become imbedded in and/or leave a
1o residue on the surface of some stainless steels; therefore,
subsequent steps of glass bead blasting and electropolishing are
requited.
while the surface finishing processes employed in the
manufacture of stainless Steel orthopedic implant devices have
been generally successful ir~~providing devices having clean
surfaces, it is desired to develop a surface finishing process
that maintains presently attained levels of surface cleanliness
while further enhancing the fatigue properties of the device.
SUMMARY OF,~HE INVENTION
Generally, the present invention provides a process far
surface finishing a metal orthopedic ~.mplant device,
wherein the fatigue strength of the device is greatly enhanced
without compromising corrosion resistance .properties of the
metal. The invention also encompasses orthopedic
implant devices fabricated in accordance with the claimed
process.
More specifically, the process of the present invention
enhances the fatigue strength of a metal (e.g.lstainless steel)
by causing a heavily cold-worked outer layer to be formed on the
metal implant device as the result of shot blasting
2

CA 02044758 2002-12-13
with steel shot. A further step of the inventive process
includes electropolishing the shot blasted surface.
In one aspect of the invention, the initial use of larger
stainless steel shot and the subsequent use of smaller glass
beads for shot blasting results in more thorough coverage and
cold-working of the outer surface of a stainless steel orthopedic
implant device. In another aspect of the invention, the step of~
electropolishing the cold-worked outer layer of the implant
device is intended to restore corrosion resistance properties to
the surface without diminishing gains in fatigue strength
produced by the shot blasting steps of the process.
An advantage of the method of the present invention is that
orthopedic implant devices having increased fatigue strength are
possible as the result of surface treatment of the device.
Another advantage of the method of the present invention is
that it is possible to significantly enhance the fatigue strength
of an orthopedic implant devices without compromising corrosion
resistance properties thereof.
A further advantage of the method of the present invention
is that aluminum oxide contamination of the surface of stainless
steel orthopedic implant devices is virtually eliminated.
Yet another advantage of the method of the present invention
is that a stainless steel orthopedic implant device having a
heavily cold-worked outer layer and a relatively soft center core
may be easily fabricated, thereby providing a device exhibiting
unique structural properties for orthopedic applications.
The invention, in one form thereof, provides a method of
manufacturing an orthopedic implant device having enhanced
fatigue properties. The method typically includes several steps,
including an initial step of providing a metal substrate in the
form of an orthopedic implant device, or component thereof. The
3

CA 02044758 2002-12-13
metal substrate has a generally smooth outer surface which,
pursuant to another step of the invention, is shot blasted with
metal shot until a cold-worked outer layer is formed on the metal
substrate. The cold-worked layer has a textured outer surface
which, according to a further step of the invention, is
electropolished. In one aspect of the invention according to
this form, the textured outer surface is shot blasted with glass
beads prior to electropolishing.
The invention further provides, in one preferred form, a
method of increasing the fatigue strength of an orthopedic
implant device that is fabricated from stainless steel. The
outer surface of the device is first shot blasted with stainless
steel shot. Next, the outer surface is shot blasted with glass
bead shot having a nominal size less than the nominal size of the
stainless steel shot. After shot blasting the outer surface with
glass bead shot, electropolishing is performed on the outer
surface. In one aspect of the invention according to this form
thereof, the nominal size of the glass beads is preferably one-
tenth to one-half that of the stainless steel shot.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the spray nozzle and fixture
associated with a bead blasting apparatus of the type used in
accordance with the method of the present invention, wherein a
fixation plate is shown being processed;
Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the process steps
involved in an exemplary embodiment of the method of the present
invention;
Fig. 3 is a fragmentary sectional view of a hip joint
including a femur having a fracture at the neck thereof, wherein
a compression hip screw, manufactured in accordance with the
4

2044'~~~
msahod of the present invention, is shown providing fixation of
the femoral head to the femurs and
Fig. 4 is an enlarged transverse sectional view of the plate
of Fig. 3, taken along the line 4-4 in Fig. 3, particularly
showing in exaggerated scale a textured outer surface, a heavily
cold-worked outer layer, a less heavily cold-worked sublayer, and
an unaffected inner core are in accordance with the present
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to Fig. 1, there is shown a shot blasting
nozzle and fixture assembly 10 of the type used in conjunction
with a shot blasting apparatus (not shown) in carrying out the
process and producing an orthopedic implant device 12 in
accordance with the preset invention. Assembly 10 includes a
. ;.
nozzle 14 used to carry and~'expel blasting media, i.e., stainless
steel shot and glass beads, with high pressure air toward a
target area of device 12. Nozzle 14 is connected to a hose~l6,
which is operably connected to a dry blast system, such as a
Model 4228-F system manufactured by Cyclo-Blast Dry Honer Co. of
Belmont, California.
Assembly 10 also includes a fixture 18 for supporting a
workpiece, i.e., orthopedic implant device 12, during the shot
blasting steps of the present invention, which steps will be more
particularly described hereinafter. Fixture 18 includes a
support block 20 attached to a base member 22 by means of a neck
portion 24. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the top surface of support
block 20 includes a V-shaped groove 26 in which device 12 is
disposed during shot blasting aperations. Nozzle 14 is
selectively spaced above support block 20 by means of a
horizontal plate member 28 having an opening 30 through which
nozzle 14 is operably received and retained therein.

2~44~~~
Plate member 28 is slidably connected to a vertical spacing
bar 32, for selective positioning above support block 20, by
means of a clamping block 34 and a pair of screws 36. Spacing
bar 32 is fixedly mounted to support block 20 by a pair of screws
38. Accordingly, it can be seen from Fig. 1 that a nozzle
opening 40 of nozzle 14, from which blasting media is expelled by
high pressure air, is directed toward and selectively positioned
above the workpiece resting on support block 20.
Referring now to Fig. 2, the steps for surface treating a
stainless steel orthopedic implant device in accord with an
exemplary embodiment of the present invention are
diagrammatically illustrated. Generally, block 50 represents the
first step of providing a stainless steel orthopedic implant
device or a component par~,thereof, i.e., a metal substrate.
Block 52 represents the next step of shot blasting the outer
surface of the part with stainless steel shot. Block 54
represents the next step of shot blasting with glass beads. The
part then undergoes electropolishing and passivation, as
represented by blocks 56 and 58, respectively. The steps will
now be described in detail.
The metal substrate provided in the step of block 50 is
preferably hot forged or cold-worked 22Cr-l3Ni-5Mn (22-13-5)
stainless steel alloy (Rb 60 to Rc 50), or hot forged or cold-
worked 316L stainless steel alloy (Rb 60 to Rc 50). Both are
used in fracture fixation devices due to their high strength,
ductility, fracture toughness, biocompatibility, and corrosion
resistance. Inasmuch as the substrate has already been
fabricated into an orthopedic implant component part prior to
this step, the surface has been appropriately machined, surface
ground, and/or mass tumbled.

2~~~'~~
The step of block 52 involves shot blasting the workpiece
with stainless steel shot of a uniform size. In one embodiment,
the shot used is cold-worked 304 stainless steel shot, the
approximate uniform nominal size of which is selected to be
l ~
r5 either 0.0070, 0.0110, 0.0170, or 0.0280 inche~i.e., U.S.
standard sieve sizes No. 80, No. 50, No. 40, and No. 25,
respectively. More particularly, the shot originally consist of
cylindrically-shaped particles which become spherically-shaped
upon repeated use as a blasting medium. Stainless steel shot of
the type disclosed herein is commercially available from Pellets,
Inc. of Tonawanda, New York.
Although larger size shot is typically used on the cold-
worked materials, the fatigue endurance limit of the treated
stainless steel part has not been found to increase significantly
with increased shot size. ':Essentially, shot blasting with steel
shot increases the fatigue strength of the part by cold-working
the outer surface layer, thereby introducing residual compressive
stress on the surface.
As represented by the step of block 54, the workpiece may be
shot blasted with glass beads, i.e., silicon oxide, after it has
been shot blasted with stainless steel shot. The uniform nominal
size of the glass beads used in the disclosed embodiment is
_._
approximately 0.0029 inch~(U.S. standard sieve size No. 200)
and, thus, is in the range of one-tenth to one-half the size of
the steel shot previously described. Consequently, this step
further improves the fatigue properties of the part by working
the surface areas not covered by the larger steel shot.
Additionally, the glass bead blasting helps clean the surface of
any steel shot residue that may have been transferred to the
target surface. Glass beads of the type disclosed herein are
commercially available from Potters, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio.

The steps of electropolishing and passivation, represented
b;y blocks 56 and 58, respectively, are performed in accordance
with conventional methods. Specifically, the electropolishing
step is performed using 85% phosphoric acid to one part (by
volume) of Electro-Glo 300 concentrate solution or equivalent,
and the passivation step is performed using a nitric acid
solution so as to provide a protective oxide film on the finished
part. The electropolishing step is an important step in
restoring the corrosion resistance properties of the surface and,
therefore, should be controlled in such a way that it produces
the desired results, i.e., cleaning and smoothening the surface
and reducing stress concentration effects, without dissolving
away the cold-worked surface layer produced during previous
steps.
The corrosion properties of stainless steel orthopedic
implant parts treated in accordance herewith are similar to that
of the base alloys in a highly polished and passivated condition.
Although shot blasting with steel shot deforms the surface and
produces sharp corners that would ordinarily decrease corrosion
resistance properties, glass bead blasting and electropolishing
mechanically and electrochemically smoothen the surface and
restore corrosion resistance properties thereto.
Referring now to Figs. 3 and 4, a femur 60 is shown with a
femoral head 62 and a fracture 64 located at a neck 66. Femoral
head 62 forms a hip joint with an acetabular member 68. An
opening 70 is formed in femur 60 to extend from a lateral side of
the femur to wn internal position within femoral head 62. In the
disclosed embodiment of the present invention, orthopedic implant
device 12 comprises a compression hip screw that has been treated
according to the process of Fig. 2. Compression hip screw 12 is
of the type disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,612,920, assigned to

i
CA 02044758 2003-03-28
the same assignee as the present invention.
Generally, compression hip screw 12 includes a lag screw 72
threadedly secured to femoral head 62, a plate 74 adapted for
5 attachment to the femur by means of bone screws 76, and a
compression screw (not shown) for coupling lag screw 72 and plate
74. As shown in Fig. 3, an upper portion of plate 74 defines an
integral barrel 78 disposed in opening 70, while a lower portion
of the plate is attached to the lateral side of the femur.
10 Referring now to Fig. 4, a cross-sectional view of plate 74
of compression hip screw 12 illustrates the structure of a
stainless steel orthopedic implant device in accordance with the
present invention. Generally, shot blasting a stainless steel
part with stainless steel shot, as described herein, results in a
15 heavily cold-worked outer layer and a less heavily cold-worked
sublayer (or diffused layer) having a thickness at least twice
that of the outer layer. Specifically, Fig. 4 shows in
exaggerated fashion a textured outer surface 80, a heavily cold-
worked outer layer 82, a less heavily cold-worked sublayer~84,
20 and an inner core or substrate 86 substantially unaffected by the
surface treatment process described herein. In one embodiment,
layer 82 is approximately .0035 to .0040 inches thick.
In a preferred embodiment of carrying out the process of the
present invention, air pressure at 90-100 psi is used with the
25 shot blasting apparatus to propel the steel shot, while air
pressure at 40 psi is used for the glass bead blasting. All
blasting is executed perpendicularly to the specimen surface,
i.e., an angle of incidence of 90°, at a distance of 1.5 and 2.0
inches from the tip of the nozzle. Parts machined from
3o stainless steel are stress relieved prior to surface
finishing.
9

~~4~~
The time duration for shot blasting with stainless steel
shot to achieve thorough coverage of the target area varies
according to several variables, including the type of shot and
target materials, the size, shape, hardness, and density of the
shot, and the velocity, flow rate, and angle of impact. However,
for one exemplary shot blasting set-up, the fatigue strength
increased rapidly over an elapsed time of approximately two
minutes until a maximum fatigue strength was achieved at an
optimal 100% surface coverage. Thereafter, the fatigue strength
declined gradually. Accordingly, it is recommended that the
duration be set at between 100-120% of the elapsed time
experimentally determined to achieve 100% surface coverage, in
order to minimize variances in fatigue strength for slightly
different timed periods.,,
While the preferred embodiment of the process of the present
invention has been described as including the step of shot
blasting with glass beads, it will be understood that this
particular step is optional. In other words, orthopedic implant
devices in accordance with the present invention may be processed
without glass bead blastingt however, glass bead blasting has
been found to smoothen the surface of the stainless steel parts
and further enhance corrosion and fatigue properties.
It will be appreciated that the fatigue strength of the
surface finish produced by the process of the present invention
is much more consistent than finishes of the prior art methods,
due to the uniform shape and higher mass of steel shot and its
ability to induce uniform cold-work on the surface of the alloy.
It is noted that greater improvement of fatigue strength is
typically experienced in the case of hot forged or annealed
stainless steel. Lesser improvement will be experienced in cold-
worked stainless steel, depending upon the alloy type and the

~a~~~~~
degree of cold-working put into the alloy prior to being finished
in accordance with the present invention.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing description of a
preferred embodiment of the invention is presented by way of
illustration only and not by way of any limitation, and that
various alternatives and modifications may be made to the
illustrated embodiment without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention.
fi.
11

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2011-06-17
Grant by Issuance 2004-04-27
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-04-26
Inactive: Final fee received 2004-02-12
Pre-grant 2004-02-12
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-14
Letter Sent 2004-01-14
4 2004-01-14
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-14
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2003-12-22
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-03-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-03-17
Letter Sent 2003-03-04
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2003-02-20
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2003-02-20
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2003-02-20
Reinstatement Request Received 2002-12-13
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2002-12-13
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2002-12-11
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2002-12-11
Appointment of Agent Request 2002-10-30
Revocation of Agent Request 2002-10-30
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2002-07-26
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-06-11
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-06-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1998-10-27
Letter Sent 1998-07-03
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-07-03
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-07-03
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-06-15
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-06-15
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-12-18

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-12-13

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-06-03

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
H. RAVINDRANATH SHETTY
JOHN H. HISS
KEVIN M. GREIG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-03-02 1 10
Description 2002-12-12 11 466
Claims 2002-12-12 1 33
Description 2003-03-27 11 470
Representative drawing 2003-12-22 1 9
Cover Page 1993-11-26 1 13
Claims 1993-11-26 4 127
Abstract 1993-11-26 1 18
Description 1993-11-26 11 446
Drawings 1993-11-26 2 37
Cover Page 2004-03-23 1 38
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-02-17 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-07-02 1 194
Notice of Reinstatement 2003-03-03 1 168
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2003-02-23 1 167
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-01-13 1 161
Correspondence 2002-07-25 3 140
Correspondence 2002-10-29 3 159
Correspondence 2004-02-11 1 33
Fees 1996-06-02 1 32
Fees 1994-06-02 1 38
Fees 1995-06-01 1 35
Fees 1993-06-02 1 34