Language selection

Search

Patent 2048602 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2048602
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR MAKING ANTISTATIC OR ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE POLYMER COMPOSITIONS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION DE COMPOSES POLYMERES ANTISTATIQUES OU CONDUCTEURS D'ELECTRICITE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09K 3/16 (2006.01)
  • C08K 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C08K 3/04 (2006.01)
  • C08K 3/08 (2006.01)
  • C08L 101/00 (2006.01)
  • H01B 1/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WESSLING, BERNHARD (Germany)
  • MERKLE, HOLGER (Germany)
  • BLATTNER, SUSANNE (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • ZIPPERLING KESSLER & CO. (G.M.B.H. & CO.) (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1999-09-07
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1990-12-22
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-07-01
Examination requested: 1991-12-10
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1990/002311
(87) International Publication Number: WO1991/010237
(85) National Entry: 1991-08-30

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 39 43 420.6 Germany 1989-12-30

Abstracts

English Abstract




Polymeric compositions rendered antistatic or electrically
conductive showing increased conductivity are obtained by
incorporating into a matrix polymer a combination of
A. a first finely divided conductive material, namely
conductive carbon black with a BET surface area of more
than 80 m2/g or an intrinsically conductive organic
polymer in complexed form, and
B. a second finely divided conductive material, namely
intercalated graphite or an intrinsically conductive
polymer in complexed form, which is different from the
material used as material A, or a metal powder and/or
C. a finely divided non conductive material having an
average particle size below 50 microns.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. An antistatic or electrically conductive polymeric composition showing
increased conductivity comprising; at least one non-conductive matrix
polymer; and at least two additives, selected from the group consisting of
additives i) A and B, ii) A and C; and iii) A and B and C, wherein
A is a first finely divided conductive material, namely conductive
carbon black with a BET surface area of more than 80m2/g or an
intrinsically conductive organic polymer in complexed form;
B is a second finely divided conductive material, namely intercalated
graphite or an intrinsically conductive polymer in complexed form,
which is different from the material used as material A, or a metal
powder, and
C is a finely divided non-conductive material having an average particle
size below 50 microns, being non-fusible under the processing
conditions and insoluble in the matrix polymer,
whereby B may not be an intrinsically conductive polymer and C may not be a
transition metal oxide if A is a conductive carbon black.

2. A composition according to Claim 1 wherein graphite intercalated with
copper
chloride or nickel chloride is used as material B.

3. A composition according to Claim 1 wherein complexed polyaniline is used as
material A or as material B.

4. A composition according to Claim 1 wherein inorganic or organic
electrically
non-conductive fillers or pigments are used as material C.

5. A composition according to Claim 4 wherein titanium dioxide is used as
inorganic pigment.



-2-

6. A composition according to Claim 4 wherein pigment yellow 13 is used as
organic pigment.

7. A composition according to Claim 1 wherein when the materials are selected
from A and B, the volume ratio is from 20:1 to 1:20; when the materials are
selected from A and C, the volume ratio of A:C is from 20:1 to 1:20; or when
the materials are selected from A and B and C, the volume ratio of A:(B + C)
is
from 20:1 to 1:20.

8. A composition according to Claim 7 wherein the materials A and B are used
in
a volume ratio of 2:1 to 1:5.

9. A composition according to Claim 7 wherein the materials A and C are used
in a volume ratio of 2:1 to 10:1.

10. A method of producing the compositions according to Claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7,
8 or 9 comprising the steps of premixing the additives i) A and B or ii) A and
C or iii) A, B and C, and then incorporating them into the matrix polymer.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





2048602
- 1 -
The plastics proce~;sing industry requires for various purposes
(e. g. for elimination of electrostatic charges, for electromag-
netic shielding or as electrodes) antistatic or electrically
conductive modifications of conventional polymers.
Thermoplastic polymers are being used amongst others as polymers
but also durop2asti~~ polymers and enamels are being made conduc-
tive. Carbon black color pigment and so-called "conductive car-
bon black" (carbon black with a specific surface area of > 80
m2/g), carbon fibe~_s, metal coated glass microspheres, metal
fibers and metal flakes are used for this purpose; mixtures of
conventional polymers with intrinsically conductive polymers are
also already known ( EP-OS 168 620 ) . Such mixtures are frequently
also referred to as "compounds" or "polymer blends".
The present invent~_on relates to a method of optimizing anti-
static or electrically conductive polymers in which finely di-
vided conductive materials, i.e. materials with a particle size
of about 1 micron and below are used. Conductive carbon black
and dispersable intrinsically conductive polymers, e.g. those
described in EP-OS 329 768, have the advantage that the conduc-
tivity is drastically increased already at a content of less
than 20 vol.~, sometimes even at significantly below 10 vol.~.
This behavior is normally referred to as "percolation" and is
described using the percolation theory; more recently an inter-
pretation of this phenomenon as "flocculation process" has been
advanced (compare B. Wel3ling, Mol. Cryst. Liqu. Cryst. 160, 205
(1988) and Synt. Met. 27, A83 (1988).
The optimization of polymers which have been made conductive is
almost always concerned with lowering the cost and with improv-
ing the mechanical and the processing properties while retaining
the conductivity by lowering the amount of conductive additives




208602
-.2 _
and also by a parallel shift of the percolation curve (the plot
of the conductivity vs. the percent content of conductive mate-
rials) to lower coni~ents. For achieving this objective different
proposals have been made in the literature:
~ According to the "percolation theory" it is recommended to
disperse in the polymers highly structured conductive mate-
rials (compare E. Sichel (ed.) "Carbon Black Polymer
Composites", New York, 1982); apparently this is only suc-
cessful when using larger particles (e. g. fibers).
~ The concentration of the conductive materials in so-called
"conductive paths" (GB-OS 2 214 511 and EP-OS 181 587) has
proved successful in many cases.
~ The improvement of the dispersibility of the conductive
materials (EP-OS 329 768) allows to shift the necessary
critical concentration for the increase of the conductivity
to lower percentages.
All proposals are still having disadvantages, especially that
the advantage of :Lower material cost is frequently counter
balanced by increased production expenditures, or that the pos
sible areas of ap~~lication are restricted. Two examples may
illustrate this point:
~ The "conductiver paths" concept (EP-OS 181 587) is not appli-
cable if - for whatever reasons - pure monophasic polymers
are to be rendered conductive.
~ Polymerblends with intrinsically conductive polymers ex-
hibited frequently the disadvantage of unsatisfactory me-
chanical properrties if modifications are needed which are
stiff and/or dimensionally stable upon heating.
It is therefore an object of the invention to develop a method


CA 02048602 1999-06-07
3
which affords a further possibility of optimizing polymers which
are antistatic or conductive, as an alternative and/or improve-
ment over the "conductive paths" or "dispersion" concepts.
The invention is directed to a method for preparing polymeric
compositions rendered antistatic or electrically conductive and
showing increased conductivity from at least one non-conductive
matrix polymer and at least two additives, which is charac-
terized in that there is used as additives a combination of
A. a first finely divided conductive material, namely con-
ductive carbon black having a BET surface area of more than
80 m2/g or an intrinsically conductive organic polymer in
complexed form, and
B. a second finely divided conductive material, namely gra-
phite or an intrinsically conductive polymer in complexed
form, which is different from the material used as material
A, or a metal powder and/or
C. a finely divided non-conductive material having an
average particle size below 50 microns.
Surprisingly it has been found that at a given additive content
in the polymer matrix the conductivity of the compound is signi-
ficantly increased if a finely divided (preferred average
particle size <_ 1 micron) conductive material A is combined with
another conductive material B consisting preferably of larger
particles of > 0,5 microns, e.g. about l0 microns (1 to 50 mi-
crons), and/or a non-conductive material C having an average
particle size < 10 microns.
Surprisingly a conductivity synergism occurs, i.e. at identical
weight or volume proportion of the finely divided conductive
material A alone or the coarser material B alone a lower conduc-
tivity results as when incorporating A and B together in the
same weight or volume ratio. Accordingly one achieves a higher
conductivity by combining A and B in comparison to A or B alone
at the identical degree of filling.




2o~sso2
- 4 -
Equally surprising is the effect that at a given content of
material A the conductivity increases by addition of material C
although material C: is non-conductive. This effect is in some
cases so significani~ that at a concentration of material A below
the critical threshold of the sudden conductivity increase(below
the percolation point) practically no conductivity is measurable
whereas the sudden conductivity increase occurs when the non
conductive material C is added. When using the materials B and
C in combination with material A the mentioned effects are ad
ditive.
In both cases an improvement of the mechanical properties will
surprisingly often :result. This is detectable primarily in con-
centration ranges resulting in a particularly high conductivity,
and when using intrinsically conductive polymers as material A
in combination with a suitable material C in rigid or heat
stable polymers.
As material A carbon black ( conductive carbon black ) having a
specific surface area of more than 80m2 g or powdery, preferably
dispersible intrins:i.cally conductive polymers in complexed form
can be used which d_Lsplay in the polymer matrix a particle size
of _< 1 micron, prei:erably < 500 nanometer. Suitable intrinsi-
cally conductive polymers are e.g. polyacetylene, polypyrrole,
polyphenylenes, polythiophenes, polyphthalocyanines and other
polymers with conjugated n-electron systems which can be ren-
dered conductive (complexed) in a known manner with acids or by
oxidation. Particularly preferred are complexed polyanilines.
Graphites are suitable as material B. Particularly preferred is
intercalated graphite (compare Rompp, Chemie-Lexikon, 8th ed.,
p. 1540/41 (1981), e.g. graphite loaded with copper(III)-chlo-
ride or with nickel(III)-chloride. Further electrode graphite or
natural graphite ma:~r be used. Metal powders are also useful as
material B. The particle size of material B is in each case
preferably larger than that of material A.




2048602
- 5 -
As material C essentially all pigments, fillers and other non-
conductive particu.Late materials which are non-fusible under
processing conditions or materials which are insoluble in the
polymer matrix and having an average particle size of about 50
microns or less may be used. Preferably the particle size of
material C is in each case larger than that of material A. Limi-
tations concerning the chemical composition of the particles
have up to now not been found. Thus titanium dioxide, organic or
inorganic pigments, fillers such as silica, chalk, talcum and
others, but also th~a neutral (compensated) non-conductive forms
of intrisically conductive polymers may be employed.
As matrix polymers all polymers are suitable such as thermo-
plastic or duromeric: polymers or enamels. The invention may also
be used in polymer blends, particularly successfully in those
corresponding to thc~ teaching of EP-OS 168 620.
The volume ratio between the materials A and B or between A and
C or between A and a combination of B and C may be varied within
broad ranges betweer,~ about 20:1 and 1:20 and has to be optimized
in each case. Prefer=red are the following values for
~ the combination of A with B 2:1 to 1:5
~ the combination of A with C 2:1 to 10:1.
The examples show a representative selection of successful ex-
periments and corresponding comparison experiments. The incor-
poration of the materials A and B and/or C may be effected by
conventional methods which are known per se; it is preferred to
premix the material:c A and B and/or C prior to their incorpo-
ration into the matrix polymer.
An explanation for the surprising effects achieved with the
invention is not yet possible. They are completely incomprehen-
sible in the light of the "percolation theory", or even inadmis-
sible. In connection with the newer concepts (B. Wessling, loc.


v
CA 02048602 1999-06-07
.,' - 6
cit.) of the sudden conductivity increase as a phase transition
between the dispersed and flocculated state the effects are also
not comprehensible but at least admissible if further, up to now
unproven assumptions are included.
In the following examples the mentioned materials A, B and C
were incorporated into conventional polymer systems. PE is LUPO
LEN~ 2424H (BASF AG). PETG is a copolyester manufactures by
Eastman Rodak. The enamel (examples 27 and 32) is a PVC/VA-co
f
polymer enamel comprising solvent.
The incorporation of the additives into PE and PETG was accom-
plished in an internal mixer after pre-mixing of the materials
A, B and optionally C in a laboratory mixer. The mixtures were
hot pressed; the specific conductivity was determined on the
pressed samples using the four point measuring technique.
The incorporation of the additives into the enamel system was
achieved after premixing in a ball mill. The liquid enamel was
applied to a support and dried.
All percentages are percent by weight.
In the table the following were used:
Ketjenblack EC - conductive carbon black, surface area about
800mz/g .
Graphite EP 1010 = electrode graphite, particle size about 10
microns.
Polyaniline-pTs = polyaniline complexed with p-toluene sulfonic
acid.




204860
_,_



~ r 10 PI ~ N r lV .-
7 N O
~ O


O C O ~ ~ O ,. ~ O ~ O '0' ~ N ~ ~ p ~ N O O
O :~ .i ~ d' O ~ ~
M --n r
~ ~


C ~ ~ m w ~ ~ .-i
~ ~ v1 v1 N V1 v1 h it h
fV v1



~ N M V v'1 v0 O O O O O O 00 V1 V~ V'1~
0 ~ N I~ vyD 00 O O ~O O ~ M M M
~ V' CO ~ ~D V' a* ~'
~ ~ M ~
'i M
v
v


f N 1
(Q 1
1 ~
1
1


n n n n .-H 'r n v n v n n 00 n v n y1 n
n n M ~ ~ fn M n n n ~O ~
'



b 'D b "J


U ~ ~ Q ~ M M M M M a
M N N .--n e-~
'r
e-n


~ M
gg oag o po



H ~:



O v1 ' ' ' ' ' n I~ O t~ O ' n '
v1 n n O I~ O ' n n n t~'1
N M v1 M ~ n
M V' ~ ~O M v)
~D


I


O O
O


.r ~ L ~ a ~ a ~ y
H ~ N ~


a


Q. Q, a
A, G~ Q. P.
W W Q. P~ CL
W c


v ~ ,
C r
~


V . (. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t9
, . m C C
)
.


C .G L C~J U ~ U U
t ~
~J U i, ~,


_ U U
_


U U z z U
U


C7 C7 a
C7 . n
,


~1 '~3, '~1.


O N M ~ ~ ~ V7 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ t0~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~D
~ h Y7 W h ~ ~ ~ N t0~1
1



V U U U U U U U U H N H H H N H H N N
U U U U E' f-' N N H
E" E-~
f-~
H H


W W W W W W W W W E-~f-~E-~E-
Q W W W ~' ~' ~ ~' '
~
'
'


x x x x x x x x x A' a' G A P,
a a x x .m x a a a a a a ' a a
v a v a a ~ a
a a a a ' ~
a a a
a a


b of t0 y N N N a7 N N C .C~' C C C C C C C C
r0 uV c0 vp C C
'


.o .n o .o a .a = .- .; .; = .= a . a
a a .n .v a ~ ;a ;a ~ ~ ~
~ .n : ~ ~
~


C C C C C C C ., b C C C C C G
~ V. u. C C C C C C d C
~ ~ ~. u. V t"
~ n ~ u. n C C
~ ~~~ n
~ .
~ ~
~
~
~
~


u u d u 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0
u u 'S~'u o 0 0 0 a. a. a, o. o.
SC x u x x x a. w w w a.
u o, w
u
u
'G
aG x x x
x SC a



w


w
O



a
a



.. d a a d a d v


C7 C7 ~ u~'u' u7 u7'u
C7 C7 u~
C7



a c a a c J ~
O W W W W J ~ ~ 7 o
W ~ W W p
W W W
P W
W W
G W
W W
W


P P S .~G G P,GØ.C.~P.G.uP,uCl.u0.u0..u0..
" "G .G .. .P a
.G . P .O '
.P. ..G ..P
. ..G
W 0. .P
.G ..G
. ..O
.



.~ N v'1 ~O 1~ N ~t v1 ~O ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ M M
M ~ 00 O~ O M I~ 00 O~ ~ N
~~ N O .r
~ v-n W --n N .~r
..r H ~
N N




Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2048602 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1999-09-07
(86) PCT Filing Date 1990-12-22
(87) PCT Publication Date 1991-07-01
(85) National Entry 1991-08-30
Examination Requested 1991-12-10
(45) Issued 1999-09-07
Deemed Expired 2010-12-22
Correction of Expired 2012-12-02

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1991-08-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1992-02-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1992-12-22 $100.00 1992-11-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1993-12-22 $100.00 1993-11-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1994-12-22 $100.00 1994-11-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1995-12-22 $150.00 1995-11-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1996-12-23 $150.00 1996-11-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1997-12-22 $150.00 1997-12-01
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1998-12-22 $150.00 1998-12-07
Final Fee $300.00 1999-06-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 1999-12-22 $150.00 1999-12-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2000-12-22 $200.00 2000-12-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2001-12-24 $200.00 2001-11-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2002-12-23 $200.00 2002-12-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2003-12-22 $200.00 2003-12-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2004-12-22 $250.00 2004-12-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2005-12-22 $450.00 2005-12-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2006-12-22 $450.00 2006-12-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2007-12-24 $450.00 2007-11-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2008-12-22 $450.00 2008-12-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ZIPPERLING KESSLER & CO. (G.M.B.H. & CO.)
Past Owners on Record
BLATTNER, SUSANNE
MERKLE, HOLGER
WESSLING, BERNHARD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-12-23 7 325
Abstract 1993-12-23 1 19
Cover Page 1999-08-31 1 31
Cover Page 1993-12-23 1 22
Claims 1993-12-23 2 64
Abstract 1999-02-24 1 20
Description 1999-02-24 7 334
Claims 1999-02-24 2 66
Description 1999-06-07 7 324
Fees 2000-12-15 1 51
Fees 2001-11-16 1 32
Fees 2002-12-12 1 35
Fees 1999-12-06 1 53
Fees 2003-12-17 1 34
Correspondence 1999-03-30 1 106
Correspondence 1999-06-07 3 148
Fees 1997-12-01 1 46
Fees 1998-12-07 1 60
Fees 2004-12-08 1 29
Fees 2005-12-07 1 27
International Preliminary Examination Report 1991-08-30 14 554
Examiner Requisition 1992-12-09 2 105
Prosecution Correspondence 1993-06-09 4 159
Examiner Requisition 1998-06-05 3 95
Prosecution Correspondence 1998-12-04 4 173
Office Letter 1998-11-02 1 21
PCT Correspondence 1998-10-01 2 64
Office Letter 1992-03-12 1 45
Prosecution Correspondence 1991-12-10 1 27
Fees 2006-12-06 1 30
Fees 1996-11-19 1 57
Fees 1995-11-24 1 49
Fees 1992-11-20 1 33
Fees 1993-11-19 1 41
Fees 1994-11-28 1 49