Language selection

Search

Patent 2052212 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2052212
(54) English Title: COLOUR-MATCHING OF COATINGS
(54) French Title: MISE A LA TEINTE DES REVETEMENTS
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B5D 5/06 (2006.01)
  • B5D 7/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MCMINN, KENNETH R. (Canada)
  • ROSS, SALLY A. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • DU PONT CANADA INC.
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • DU PONT CANADA INC. (Canada)
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: TORYS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-01-07
(22) Filed Date: 1991-09-25
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-03-29
Examination requested: 1998-08-27
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
90.21161 (United Kingdom) 1990-09-28

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process for the sequential coating of an object
with at least one undercoat and then at least one
pigmented topcoat is disclosed. The undercoat has a
colour selected from white, grey and black, and a
reflectance value of ~10, preferably ~5, units of the
reflectance value of the topcoat. The process reduces
the number of coatings or the amount of film build of
topcoat in order to achieve efficient colour match of
topcoat. The process is particularly useful in the
automotive industry, especially the refinish portion of
that industry.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-9-
What is claimed is:
1. A process for the sequential coating of an object with at least one
undercoat and
then at least one pigmented topcoat, in which the at least one pigmented
topcoat has a
reflectance value of "R", said at least one undercoat and at least one
pigmented topcoat
being comprised of polymers in carrier liquids, the process comprising the
steps of:
(a) selecting an undercoat composition having a reflectance value within ~ 10
of the reflectance value, "R", of the at least one pigmented topcoat, said
undercoat
composition being white, grey or black in colour;
(b) applying at least one coat of the undercoat composition of (a) to the
object; and
(c) applying the at least one pigmented topcoat.
2. The process of Claim 1 in which the undercoat composition has a reflectance
value within ~5 units of the reflectance value of the at least one topcoat.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 1 -
COLOUR--1HATCHING OF COATINGS
The present invention relates to the colour matching
of coatings in a process of coating objects with an
undercoat and a pigmented topcoat. In particular, the
invention relates to a process in which the reflectance
of the undercoat and topcoat are matched to improve the
efficiency of the colour matching and in which the
undercoat is white, grey or black, but not otherwise
coloured by pigment. As used herein, "undercoat" refers
to the combination of layers of primers, sealers and
other coatings underneath the outer or topcoat on an
obj ect .
The coating of objects, including metal and plastic
objects with pigmented coatings is well known, a major
example being the application of topcoats in the
automotive industry. One or more undercoats e.g. primer
and sealer, are applied to the object, followed by one or
more topcoats. Usually a plurality of coatings of a
topcoat are applied. One of the principal reasons for
the application of a number of topcoats is to achieve a
highly uniform coating of the object, especially with
respect to the colour of the object. This is especially
critical in the automotive industry, where the coatings
are subjected to a wide variety of extreme lighting
conditions and consumers demand high quality in the
consistency of colour between differewt parts of the
automobile.
The problems of differing opacifying power of
topcoats, especially different colours of topcoats, is
discussed in U.S. Patent 4 876 111 of D. Guyomard et al,
which issued 1989 October 24. Grey was stated to be an
unsatisfactory colour for the undercoat ~n view of the
poor opacifying characteristics of some colours,
specifically yellow and red. The method disclosed by D.
DC-025?. -~ $

- 2 -
Guoyomard et al to overcome the opacifying problem was to
blend a pigmented paste with a neutral primer base to
form a pigmented undercoat, which was then applied to the
object, the pigmented paste being selected an the basis
of a classification of the colour of the topcoat.
Although the use of pigmented undercoats may offer
a solution to poor opacifying power of pigments, the wide
variety of colours of automobiles would require a
substantial inventory of pigmented pastes to enable a
range of colours of undercoat to be produced as demanded
by the colour of the topcoat, as well as a need to select
an appropriate undercoat colour for efficient colour
matching with the topcoat. This would be especially
critical in automobile repair operations i.e. the
automotive refinish industry. That industry must colour '
match refinished objects to remaining sections having the
original colour of the automobile on an individual unit
basis i.e. for each automobile passing through the
refinish operation. Problems of contamination of colours
from one undercoat to the next would also exist.
It has now been found that undercoats that are
white, greyor black in colour, without coloured pigments,
enable efficient colour matching of the topcoat, reducing
both inventory and contamination problems.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a
process for the sequential coating of an object with at
least one undercoat and then at least one pigmented
topcoat, in which the pigmented topcoat has a reflectance
value of "R", said undercoat and topcoat being comprised
of polymers in carrier liquids, comprising the steps of:
(a) selecting an undercoat composition having a
reflectance value within -~10 of the reflectance value,
"R", of the topcoat, said undercoat composition being
white, grey or black in colour:
(b) applying at least one coat of the undercoat
Dc-0252 - 2 -

- 3 -
composition of (a) to the object; and
(c) applying the composition of the pigmented topcoat.
Reflectance is a measure of the amount of light
reflected by a surface, the present invention being
concerned with light in the visible spectrum i.e. light
with wavelengths in the range of approximately 400 to
?OOnm. A coloured material reflects light of its own hue
and absorbs light of other hues. Measurement of
reflectance results in a spectral reflectance curve; as
used herein, reflectance "R'° is the peak value on the
spectral reflectance curve. Apparatus for the
measurement of reflectance are understood to typically
measure the spectral reflectance curve at more than one
angle, although the actual angles used may differ.
Reflectance is measured on a scale of 0-100, with white
having a value of 100 and black a value of 0; values
above 100 may be obtained at some angles of measurement
i.e. at or near the specular angle (the specular angle
being 90° to the incident light source of the measuring
device), due to presence of aluminum flakes in some
topcoats, and such angles should not be used in
reflectance measurements pertaining to the present
invention.
The reflectance values may be determined on a colour
analyzing apparatus; an example of commercially available
apparatus is a Macbeth Color-Eye~ 5010
Goniospectrophotometer. Techniques of coating undercoats
and especially topcoats onto test panels to a consistent
colour are well known and frequently used in test
laboratories.
The process of the present invention relates to the
colour matching of undercoats and topcoats on coated
objects, and especially to a simple and practical method
of achieving matched colours. The process requ~.res the
use of undercoats that axe white or various shades of
DC-0252 - 3 -

~D~~~1~
-4-
grey, including very dark grey, or black, regardless of
the colour of the topcoat. This is achieved by matching
the reflectance of the undercoat to that of the topcoat.
The preparation of undercoats having a range of
reflectance values may be illustrated by the following
procedure, using three undercoat compositions. In this
illustration, the first undercoat is white, the second
undercoat is medium grey and the third undercoat is a
very dark grey. To prepare the range of undercoats, the
first and second undercoats are mixed in two differing
proportions e.g. 2:1 and 1:2. Likewise, the second and
third undercoats are mixed in two differing proportions
e.g. 2:1 and 1:2. The reflectance values are then
measured on the resultant seven undercoat compositions:
the reflectance values would range from low values e.g. .
approximately 10, to high values e.g. approximately 90,
the actual values depending on the three undercoat
compositions originally selected and the mixing
proportions. A plurality of panels of a material
appropriately similar to the object to be coated are
coated with each of the undercoat compositions, and
dried.
To further illustrate the invention, a series of
panels coated with the topcaat composition may be
prepared; the series involves coating panels that have
been coated with an undercoat composition with different
numbers of coatings of a selected topcoat, so that for a
particular undercoat a series of panels coated with one
coating of topcoat, two coatings of topcoat, three
coatings of topcoat etc. are obtained. Each topcoat is
air dried before application of the next top coat. L,a,b
measurements are made on all panels; persons skilJ..ed in
the art will appreciate that other colour measurement
classifications may be used. Far each undercoat, the
L,a,b values will vary with increasing number of coatings
DC-0252 4 -

_ 5
of the topcoat, and tend towards a constant L,a,b value.
The constant reflectance value indicates the minimum
number of topcoats required for that particular undercoat
in order to achieve an acceptable coating. Repeating the
process for the different undercoats will reveal the
preferred undercoat i.e. the one giving an acceptable
topcoat with the minimum number of coats i.e. minimum
film build, of the topcoat. While this illustration has
been described with reference to L,a,b measurements, it
should be understood that some skilled persons may be
able to achieve the same result through visual
observations.
In practice, the full procedure described above as
an illustration would not be necessary. The reflectance
of the topcoat is predetermined, either because the
topcoat being applied must match adjacent coatings on the
object, or because a customer has selected a particular
topcoat for the object. The requirement then becomes a
matter of matching of the reflectance "R" of the topcoat
to that of the undercoat. The reflectance of the
undercoat and topcoat should be within ~1.0 reflectance
units, especially within ~5 reflectance units, on the 0-
100 scale described above? if the undercoat and topcoat
have differing reflectance values, it is preferred that
the undercoat have the lower reflectance value.
The supplier of the topcoat cauld provide a
reflectance value, "R", for the topcoat, or a code
related to the reflectance value for the topcoat, based
on laboratory testing prior to shipment to the customer.
The customer that is applying the topcoat could then
select an undercoat composition to provide an undercoat
that enables an efficient colour match of the topcoat.
Alternatively, the procedure illustrated above could be
conducted on a relatively small selection of undercoats,
based on the nature of the topcoat being applied, to give
DC-0252 - 5 -

the undercoat requiring the minimum number of coatings of
topcoat.
The undercoat compositions used in the invention are
intended to be white, a shade of grey or black, without
any coloured pigments that assist in the matching of the
colours of the undercoat and the topcoat. While minor
amounts of a coloured pigment may be added, they may or
may not assist in the colour matching of the topcoat, and
may have detrimental effects on and increase the
complexity of the colour matching.
Both the undercoat and topcoat will normally be in
the form of a polymeric component in a carrier liquid.
The polymeric component is also known as resin or binder,
and catalysts and other additives may also be added to
the compositions, as will be appreciated by persons
skilled in the art. The carrier liquid may be an organic
solvent, the polymeric component being in the form of a
solution or dispersed in the liquid. Alternatively, the
carrier liquid may be an aqueous solution, in which event
the polymeric component will normally be in the form of
a dispersion. In another embodiment, the topcoat may be
in the form of a powder. The topcoat will normally also
contain pigments. The undercoat may or may not contain
pigments in minor amounts.
The undercoat and topcoat may be applied using
spraying techniques, as will be understood by persons
skilled in the art. Alternatively, especially for the
undercoat, the coating may be applied by
electrodeposition techniques. Other coating techniques
may also be used.
The method of the present invention may be used in
the coating of objects in which a undercoat and a topcaat
are applied. In particular, the process may be used in
the automotive industry, and especially in the refinish
or repair portions of the automotive industry.
DC-0252 - 6 -

The use of the fewest number of topcoats, or minimal
film build, to achieve an acceptable coating has a number
of benefits to the operator of the coating line e.g. in
a repair or refinish coating operation. For instance,
fewer coatings (or less film build) means that less
topcoat is required in order to obtain the acceptable
coating, which is a savings in terms of both the cost of
the topcoat and the time required i.e. the time to apply
the required number of coatings is reduced.
The present invention is illustrated by the
embodiments shown in the following examples:
Example I
A series of undercoats were prepared by admixing two
compositions that were white and medium grey or medium
grey and very dark grey in colour. A total of seven
undercoats were prepared, having reflectance values of
from approximately 20 to 85.
A red metallic automotive topcoat was selected for
testing. When tested for reflectance, this topcoat had a
reflectance "R" of 20. This value of reflectance was
intermediate between undercoat # 6 having a reflectance
of 15 and undercoat #5 having a reflectance of 25. In
the absence of preparation of another undercoat with a
reflectance more closely matching that of the topcoat, it
would therefore be expected that undercoat #6 would be
the preferred undercoat.
A series of 21 panels were prepared, in three sets
of seven, from undercoats #5 and 6 above, and from
undercoat #~ which had a reflectance of 10. One panel of
each set was coated with two coats of the red metallic
topcoat. Similarly, one panel from each set was coated
with from three to eight coats of the topcoat, such that
all 21 panels had been coated. Each coating of topcoat
was approximately 25 microns in thickness and was air
dried prior to application of any further coating.
DC-0252 - 7 -

_$_
L,a,b measurements were conducted on all panels.
The panels were also inspected visually for colour match
to a standard. Tn each series, the panels with a colour
match to a standard panel coated with the same topcoat
were determined. It was found that undercoats #5 and #?
required at least 6 coats of the topcoat before a colour
match was obtained, with the grey shade being apparent
after 4 coats with both of these undercoats. However,
undercoat #6 gave a good colour match after 4 coats of
topcoat, confirming the prediction that undercoat #6
would be the preferred undercoat.
Example IT
The procedure of Example I was repeated using 35
topcoats of different colours. In each instance, the
undercoat having the closest match of reflectance to that
of the topcoat was the preferred undercoat, requiring the
least number of coats of topcoat to obtain a colour
match.
While the present invention has been illustrated by
mixing of undercoat compositions, those compositions
could have been prepared previously by similar or
different means, and then selected to match the topcoat.
DC-0252 - $ -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2052212 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2008-09-25
Letter Sent 2007-09-25
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-08-30
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-30
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-30
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-08-30
Revocation of Agent Request 2007-08-10
Appointment of Agent Request 2007-08-10
Inactive: Office letter 2007-05-23
Inactive: Corrective payment - s.78.6 Act 2006-10-24
Inactive: Office letter 2005-05-24
Letter Sent 2005-05-24
Letter Sent 2005-05-24
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-15
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-15
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-15
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-15
Revocation of Agent Request 2004-06-29
Appointment of Agent Request 2004-06-29
Grant by Issuance 2003-01-07
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-01-06
Pre-grant 2002-10-25
Inactive: Final fee received 2002-10-25
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-10-02
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-10-02
4 2002-10-02
Letter Sent 2002-10-02
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-08-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-12-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-12-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-10-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-04-30
Appointment of Agent Request 1999-03-15
Revocation of Agent Request 1999-03-15
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-03-10
Inactive: Office letter 1999-03-10
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-03-10
Inactive: Office letter 1999-03-02
Revocation of Agent Request 1999-01-27
Appointment of Agent Request 1999-01-27
Revocation of Agent Request 1999-01-22
Appointment of Agent Request 1999-01-22
Revocation of Agent Request 1998-12-08
Appointment of Agent Request 1998-12-08
Inactive: Office letter 1998-11-10
Inactive: Office letter 1998-11-10
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-09-21
Letter Sent 1998-09-21
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-09-21
Appointment of Agent Request 1998-09-09
Revocation of Agent Request 1998-09-09
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-08-27
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-08-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-03-29

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-07-02

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DU PONT CANADA INC.
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
KENNETH R. MCMINN
SALLY A. ROSS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2002-12-03 1 27
Claims 1994-04-08 1 20
Description 1994-04-08 8 357
Cover Page 1994-04-08 1 18
Abstract 1994-04-08 1 19
Claims 2001-10-29 1 21
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-05-25 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-09-20 1 177
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2002-10-01 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-11-05 1 171
Correspondence 2002-10-24 1 38
Correspondence 1999-01-26 8 254
Correspondence 1999-03-01 2 12
Correspondence 1999-03-09 2 12
Correspondence 1993-09-14 4 193
Correspondence 1998-11-09 1 8
Correspondence 1998-11-09 1 7
Correspondence 1998-12-07 4 122
Correspondence 1999-01-21 6 188
Correspondence 1999-03-14 3 78
Correspondence 1998-09-08 6 129
Correspondence 2004-06-28 3 98
Correspondence 2004-07-14 1 13
Correspondence 2004-07-14 1 16
Correspondence 2004-07-19 2 89
Correspondence 2005-05-23 1 29
Correspondence 2006-10-23 9 285
Correspondence 2007-05-22 1 16
Correspondence 2007-08-09 3 62
Correspondence 2007-08-29 1 18
Correspondence 2007-08-29 1 20
Fees 1996-06-03 1 90
Fees 1994-09-25 1 42
Fees 1995-06-05 1 41
Fees 1993-06-10 1 38