Language selection

Search

Patent 2065491 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2065491
(54) English Title: METAL RECOVERY
(54) French Title: RECUPERATION DE METAL
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22B 3/18 (2006.01)
  • C12P 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C22B 15/00 (2006.01)
  • C22B 23/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HAINES, ALAN KEITH (South Africa)
(73) Owners :
  • GENERAL MINING, METALS AND MINERALS LIMITED
  • BILLITON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY B.V.
(71) Applicants :
  • GENERAL MINING, METALS AND MINERALS LIMITED (South Africa)
  • BILLITON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY B.V.
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-07-08
(22) Filed Date: 1992-04-07
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-10-09
Examination requested: 1999-04-06
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
91/2566 (South Africa) 1991-04-08

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method of extracting metal from sulphide ores, which includes the steps
of solubilizing the metal into a sulphate solution, and generating sulphide
by anaerobic bacterial action in the sulphate solution, thereby to cause
the metal in the solution to be precipitated as an insoluble sulphide, thus
upgrading the metal into a highly concentrated form.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Page 6
CLAIMS
1. A method of extracting metal from sulphide ores, which includes the
steps of solubulizing the metal into a sulphate solution which is generated
by means of an acid dissolution process, and generating sulphide by
anaerobic bacterial action in the sulphate solution, thereby to cause the
metal in the solution to be precipitated as an insoluble sulphide, thus
upgrading the metal into a highly concentrated form.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sulphate solution is
passed through a bed of inert material to which bacteria become attached
and use is made of the bacterium Desulfovivrio Desulfuricans to effect
sulphide generation.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the ore is crushed and
treated by heap leaching with iron sulphate solutions which carry at least
one of the following bacteria: Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus
thiooxidans, and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the metal sulphates are
solubilized directly by at least one of the following bacteria: Thiobacillus
ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans.

Page 7
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein finely milled ore is treated
by froth flotation to form a metal sulphide flotation concentrate which is
treated in one or more tanks using at least one of the following bacteria:
Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, and Leptospirillum
ferrooxidans.
6. A method according to claim 1 in which the pH of the sulphate
solution is maintained within the range of from 1,2 to 3,0 during the step of
solubilizing the metal.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the pH is maintained within
the range of from 2,0 to 2,5 during the step of solubilizing the metal.
8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the precipitated metal
sulphide is separated from the solution and processed to recover the
metal.
9. A method according to claim 1 wherein the acid is generated by
bacterial leaching of the ore.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02065491 2002-10-03
Page 1
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the recovery of metal such as nickel, copper,
cobalt or the like, from sulphide ores.
SUMMARY OF THE INV~NTIION
According to the invention there is provided a method of extracting metal from
sulphide ores, which includes the steps of solubulizing the metal into a
sulphate solution which is generated by means of an acid dissolution process,
and generating sulphide by anaerobic bacterial action in the sulphate
solution,
thereby to cause the metal in the solution to be precipitated as an insoluble
sulphide, thus upgrading the metal into a highly concentrated form.
The sulphide is generated in a reactor. The sulphate solution may be
passed through a bed of inert material to which bacteria become attached
and use may be made of the bacterium Desulfovivrio Desulfuricans to
effect sulphide generation.
Nutrients may be used to enhance sulphide generation and inert gas such
as nitrogen may be used for maintaining the anaerobic environment.

CA 02065491 2002-10-03
Page 2
The method includes the step of generating the sulphate solution for example
by means of an aad dissalution process.
Acid may be generated by treating the ore by bacterial action.
In one embodiment of the invention the ore is crushed and treated by
heap leaching with iron sulphate solutions which, optionally, carry
bacteria. The bacteria may be Thiobacitlus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus
thiooxidans, or Leptospiriilum ferrooxidans. Sulphuric acid is then
generated and the sulphate solution is formed.
Alternatively the metal sulphates are solubilized directly by bacterial action
using one or more of the aforementioned bacteria.
Sulphuric acid or an alkali such as lime may be added to the solution to
maintain the pH within the range of 1,2 to 3,0, and preferably within the
range of 2,0 to 2,5.
The metal sulphate solution may alternatively be generated by treating a
froth flotation concentrate. In this case a finely milled ore may be treated
by froth flotation to form a metal sulphide flotation concentrate. The
concentrate may then be treated to form the sulphate solution. This may,
for example, take place in a series of tanks with a solution containing one

~0~~4~1
Page ~
or more of the aforementioned bacteria.
The metal sulphide which is precipitated may be separated from the
solution by any physical separation method, for example filtration or the
like. The precipitation step may take place in the vessel in which the
sulphide is generated, or in a separate vessel. Thereafter the precipitate
can be processed in any suitable way, e.g. smelting, roasting or the like,
to recover the metal.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The invention is further described by way of example with reference to the
accompanying flow sheet which illustratEa two methods of extracting
metal from sulphide ores according to they invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMSODINBENTS
The process of the invention is applicable to the extraction of metal, in
particular nickel, copper and cobalt, contained in sulphide ores. The
following description is however made with reference to a nickel recovery
process only. It is to be understood though that the following principles

CA 02065491 2002-10-03
Page 4
can be applied equally to the recovery of copper and cobalt.
Referring to the flow sheet the mined ore is crushed at a stage 10 and the
crushed ore is piled on a prepared base and treated in a leaching process
12. In the leaching process 12, iron sulphate solutions carrying
Thiobacilius ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, or l_eptospirillum
ferrooxidans, or a mixture of any two or all three of the bacteria, are
percolated through the heap. in this way nickel sulphate, iron sulphate
and sulphuric acid are generated.
According to the alkalinity of the ore further sulphuric acid or lime may be
added to maintain the pH within the preferred range of 1,6 to 2,5 in which
the viability of the bacteria is ensured.
The solution then passes to a biological sulphide reduction process 14
where, under anaerobic conditions and in a suitable reactor or in a series
of reactors, soluble sulphates are converted to sulphide. In the presence
of the soluble sulphide the nickel Is precipitated as an insoluble nickel
sulphide. Precipitation may be effected in the same reactor or reactors,
or in a separate vessel or vessels. Iron in the solution is reduced to the
ferrous state and does not precipitate with the nickel sulphide. This step
is more fully described in the specification of South African patent
No. 89/7731 issued July 25, 1990.

CA 02065491 2002-10-03
Page 5
In a stage 16 the precipitated nickel sulphide is physically separated by
means of filtration or any other appropriate method. This may be
accomplished in the vessel in which the sulphide is generated, or in a
separate vessel.
In a subsequent step 18 the nickel sulphide is further processed in any
appropriate way, such as smelting, roasting or the like, to recover the
nickel.
Where the grade of the deposit is sufficiently high to justify additional
mechanical processing costs the ore is finely milled in a step 20 and
subjected to a froth flotation process 22 whereby a nickel sulphide
flotation concentrate is produced. As is indicated by the numeral 24 this
concentrate is subjected to biological oxidation in one or more tanks
using one or more of the bacteria Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus
thiooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, thereby to dissolve the nickel
to form the sulphate solution. The oxidation step may take place at a pH
of from 1,2 to 3,0, and preferably the pH lies in the range of 2,0 to 2,5.
The sulphate solution can then be treated as described hereinbefore.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2012-04-07
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Grant by Issuance 2003-07-08
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-07-07
Inactive: Final fee received 2003-04-07
Pre-grant 2003-04-07
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-12-12
Letter Sent 2002-12-12
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-12-12
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-11-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-10-03
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-04-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-03-07
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1999-04-22
Letter Sent 1999-04-22
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1999-04-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-04-06
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-04-06
Inactive: Applicant deleted 1997-10-27
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1997-04-07
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1997-04-07
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-10-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1997-04-07

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-03-31

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GENERAL MINING, METALS AND MINERALS LIMITED
BILLITON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY B.V.
Past Owners on Record
ALAN KEITH HAINES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-12-02 1 5
Cover Page 2003-06-03 1 28
Abstract 1994-01-21 1 11
Claims 1994-01-21 2 48
Cover Page 1994-01-21 1 14
Description 1994-01-21 5 140
Drawings 1994-01-21 1 13
Description 2002-10-03 5 176
Claims 2002-10-03 2 62
Representative drawing 1999-06-29 1 11
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-06-25 1 116
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-12-08 1 116
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-01-21 1 115
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1999-04-22 1 178
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2002-12-12 1 160
Fees 2003-03-31 1 41
Correspondence 2003-04-07 1 34
Fees 1998-02-27 1 52
Fees 2002-04-05 1 32
Fees 2001-04-03 1 31
Fees 1999-04-01 1 48
Fees 2000-04-04 1 48
Fees 2004-03-16 1 36
Fees 2005-03-15 1 27
Fees 2006-03-14 1 36
Fees 1997-04-07 1 62
Fees 1995-04-04 1 51
Fees 1996-03-08 1 50
Fees 1994-03-29 1 27