Language selection

Search

Patent 2071974 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2071974
(54) English Title: VACCINE COMPOSITIONS FOR FISH
(54) French Title: VACCINS POUR POISSONS
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61K 39/00 (2006.01)
  • A61K 9/00 (2006.01)
  • A61K 9/107 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BARRATT, MICHAEL EDWARD JOHN (United Kingdom)
  • LEADBEATER, DENNIS (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • UNILEVER PLC
  • BOOKER AQUACULTURE LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • UNILEVER PLC (United Kingdom)
  • BOOKER AQUACULTURE LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-05-23
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1991-10-18
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-04-30
Examination requested: 1998-09-25
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB1991/001828
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1992006599
(85) National Entry: 1992-06-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
90311541.8 (United Kingdom) 1990-10-22

Abstracts

English Abstract


An oral composition for fish or similar aquatic creatures comprises a stable
viscous water-in-oil emulsion containing a
vaccine against fish disease, the emulsion being carried on fish feed
particles. The oral composition can be administered to fish in a
non-labour-intensive manner and causes no stress to the fish, in complete
contrast to conventional vaccine administration by
parenteral injection. Moreover, the oral composition can substantially reduce
the minimum effective vaccine dose.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-13-
CLAIMS:
1. A composition for oral administration to fish, comprising a water-in-oil
emulsion containing a vaccine that can induce an immune response via the
gut, the emulsion being carried on a particulate feedstuff, and wherein said
water-in-oil emulsion comprises a water:oil mixture of 6:4 to 4:6 by weight.
2. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the emulsion is carried on
a particulate fish feed that is nutritionally deficient in oil.
3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the vaccine is a
vaccine against furunculosis.
4. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the
emulsion comprises at least 1% by weight of the composition.
5. A process for the preparation of the composition of any one of claims 1
to 4, said process comprising blending a mixture of oil, water and a vaccine
to
form a water-in-oil emulsion containing a vaccine, and applying said water-in-
oil emulsion containing a vaccine to a particulate feedstuff.
6. A process according to claim 5, wherein additional oil is applied to the
particulate feedstuff after the emulsion is applied to the particulate
feedstuff.
7. Use of a water-in-oil emulsion containing a vaccine, wherein said
water-in-oil emulsion comprises a water:oil mixture of 6:4 to 4:6 by weight,
in
the preparation of a medicament for treating bacterial kidney disease, enteric
redmouth, vibriosis and furunculosis in fish.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


. ..Vbr~ 92106599 PCT/GB91/01828
VACCINE COMPOSITIONS FOR FISH
IO
This invention relates to compositions useful for
oral administration of sensitive materials such as
vaccines to aduatic animals, especially fish.
The intensive rearing of fish such as salmon, which
today is practised vn a wide scale, suffers from the
disadvantage that the entire stock of fish in a facility
may become infected with disease. The commercial
consequences of a serious disease outbreak can be
enormous. Several well-recognised fish diseases are
causing severe problems in the fish farming industry.
Examples are bacterial-kidney disease, caused by
~ten~bacterium salmo inarum; enteric redmouth, caused by
Yersinia ruc a '; and Vibriosis, caused by various strains
of Vibrio, notably V anauillarum and V salmonicida.
Currently, the most significant disease, at least as far
3o as the farming in T3orthern Europe of Atlantic salmon
Salma salary is concerned, is furunculosis; this is
caused by the bacterium Aeromonas salmo~i,cida.
3S

PC'I'/GB91/01~2~ ,.,~
i~t~ 92/06599
The desirability of immunising farmed fish against
such diseases has long been recognised. However,
technical progress in this area has been slow. This
applies both to the effectiveness of the commercially
available vaccines (a wholly effective vaccine for salmon
against furunculosis has yet to be developed), and also to
the means by which such vaccines are administered to the
fish. Traditionally, administration of vaccines to fish
has either been by immersion (which j.s wasteful as well as
of limited efficacy), or by injection. Although injection
to
of individual fish provides a sure way of delivering a
vaccine, it suffers from the disadvantages that it is very
labour-intensive, and moreover the handling and injection
cause considerable stress to the fish, and can precipitate
disease problems or at least cause temporarily retarded
1~
growth. Usually fish are anaesthetised prior to
injection. .
There is a clear commercial need for a vaccine
delivery system for fish which is less labour-intensive,
and which causes little or no stress to the fish.
For some while it has been recognised that an oral
delivery system, in which a vaccine is administered to the
fish either as part of the regular diet or in a
composition administered together with the regular diet,
would be beneficial. Reported experiments involving
attempted oral administration of fish vaccines have
yielded inconsistent results, and no effective oral
3o vaccine has yet become available commercially. Particular
problems recognised in the oral route are: possible loss
of or damage to essential vaccine components during
manufacture of the composition; possible loss of
water-soluble vaccine components in the aqueous
environment ~n which the fish live; and possible

'.WO 92/0699 PCTlGB91l01828
- 3 -
degradation of the vaccine within the intestine of the
fish before the vaccine has induced a protective response.
By the present invention we provide a particulate
composition for oral administration to aquatic creatures,
especially fish, comprising a water-in-coil emulsion
containing a sensitive agent such as a vaccine or the
like, the emulsion being carried on a solid edible carrier
material, preferably particles of a feed-stuff appropriate
to for the aquatic creatures.
The skilled reader will readily appreciate that the
invention can be adapted far use with aquatic creatures
other than true fish, for example crustacea such as
prawns, shrimps, lobsters and crabs, and molluscs such as
oysters. For convenience,. the invention will be described
in relation to fish, and the term "fish°' should be
understood as encompassing other aquatic life farms that
may benefit from the oral administration of vaccines and
2o the like. Bxamples of true fish that are reared on a
substantial scale in captivity in various parts of the
world are: Atlantic salmon, Pacific salmon, rainbow
trout, brown trout, catfish, halibut, turbot, carp and
tilapia.
Generally, the sensitive agent will be water-soluble
rather than oil-soluble, and hence dispersed in the
aqueous phase of the emulsion. The emulsion should
contain sufficient of the sensitive agent to provide the
3o desired effect, eg. an effective immune response, when the
composition is administered to the fish.
Preferably the emulsion is applied to particulate
fish feed~that is nutritionally deficient in oil.

W~ 921U65~9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/GB91/01828
- 4 -
Preferably the emulsion comprises a water: oil mixture
containing not more than about 70% by weight water. More
preferably, the water content is not greater than about
65% by weight. Nevertheless, the emulsion must contain
sufficient water to act as a carrier for the water-soluble
agent, and a particularly preferred water: oil weight ratio
range is 6:4 to 4:6.
Preferably the emulsion comprises at least about 1%
to by weight of the final composition. More preferably, the
emulsion comprises at least about 2%, and ideally at least
about 3%, by weight of the composition. Generally, the
amount of emulsion is not greater than about 10%~by
weight.
The emulsion should have a viscous consistency, ie.
creamy and flowable, to enable it to be applied uniformly
to the particulate carrier.
2o The carrier should be relatively dry and non-oily so
that the applied emulsion can be absorbed, at least
partially, by the particles. Preferably the particulate
carrier is nn-oiled feed in granular or pelletted form.
The composition of the feed is not critical to the
invention, as long as the formulation is appropriate for
the fish to which the composition is to be fed, and at the
time of adding the emulsion the particles do not contain
oil ar other fluid ingredients in such amounts that the
emulsion cannot be absorbed by the particles. After the
3o aPPlication of the emulsion, the particles should still be
sufficiently dry and free-flowing to be handled in the
same manner as conventional fish feed. Typical fish feeds
are high in protein, and are conventionally based an fish
meal with added components such as cereals, and ail as an
energy source. Fish meal naturally contains a certain

?p~yf~'~~
W~0 92/06599 PCT/GB91/01828
amount of ail, but usually this needs to be boosted for
nutritional reasons. The additional oil is usually added
to the granules or pellets after these have been formed;
the oil-deficient material is herein termed "un-oiled'°.
The size of fish feed pellets varies widely, depending on
the type and age of the fish; for salmon the pellets
typically have a diameter from about Z to about 6mm, with
pellets of about 3mm being appropriate at the smolt stage.
Fish feeds can also contain minor components such as
vitamins, minerals, preservatives and pigments.
to
Alternatively, non-feed carriers can be used, but these
should provide final compositions that are perceived by
the fish as normal feed, otherwise the fish may ignore ar
reject the composition. Fish tend to be very critical in
Z5 accepting feed particles, and many factors such as size,
shape, colour and density, which all affect the
"behaviour" of the particles in water, can be very
influential. A composition of the invention should
therefore be made to have physical properties as similar
2o as passible to those of the normal feed to which the fish
are accustomed.
The emulsion should be sufficiently stable to protect
the aqueous phase for a time sufficient to enable the
25 composition to be produced and administered to the fish.
In general, the emulsion should not °'crack'°, ie. separate
into distinct aqueous and oil phases, in less than one
week. Preferably, the emulsion is stable for at least one
month.
The oil is preferably a neutral oil, because the
presence of free fatty acids can sometimes interfere with
the formation of an adequately stable emulsion.
Preferably, the level of free fatty acids should b~ not
greater than about 5a by weight of the oil, and ideally

W~ 92/06599 PCTlGB91/01~2~ '. ~ '
not greater than about 3~. Preferred oils are whole fish
body oil and neutral marine oil. If desired, the emulsion '
can incorporate an antioxidant such as butylated
hydroxytoluene or ethoxyquin. '
The emulsifier should be food grade, and is
preferably a lecithin. An ideal emulsifier is soya
lysolecithin (a modified phospholipid) and examples are
available commercially from Unimills BV under the trade
name "Bolek". Generally, the emulsifier will comprise
from about 0.1 to about 5% by weight of the total
emulsion.
The emulsion can be prepared by blending the oil and
aqueous phases, generally at ambient temperature, using a
homogeniser. In-line homogenising equipment is preferred.
Preferably the components can be recycled two: or more
times through the homogeniser if desired.
The invention also provides a process for the
preparation of an orally administrable composition for
fish, wherein a stable water-in-oil emulsion containing a
sensitive agent such as a vaccine, is applied to a
particulate feedstuff, preferably by pan-coating or the
like.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention,
additional oil, eg. from about 1 to about 3% by weicJht, is
applied to the particulate composition after the
aPPlication thereto of the emulsion. This can also be
achieved by pan-coating.
An important aspect of the invention is the use of an
oral delivery system to reduce the total effective
administered dose level of a vaccine that would otherwise

CA 02071974 2001-11-28
7 _
need to be administered by a non-oral route (generally by
injection or immersion) in a substantially higher total
dose. We have found that administration of a vaccine in a
composition according to the invention surprisingly
enables an effective protective response in fish to be
achieved at a much lower dose level. In some
circumstances, a 10-fold reduction in the effective dose
level can be achieved.
l0 For example, we have conducted trials with a
commercially-available furunculosis vaccine ("Furogen")~
which is recommended for single administration by
parenteral injection at a dose level of 0.1 ml per fish.
We have administered this commercially-available vaccine
orally to salmon using a composition of the invention. We
have found that a total dose level of only 0.001 ml
"Furogen" per fish, administered orally over a ten-day
period, provided protection at least as effective as the
single recommended 0.1 ml dose administered by injection.
2o In contrast to the injection route, oral administration of
the vaccine in accordance with the invention did not cause
any stress to the fish, and could be conducted as part of
their normal feeding regime.
Although the theory behind the effectiveness of the
invention is not yet fully understood, we believe that the
oral administration of a furunculosis vaccine in
accordance with the invention promotes a cellular response
in the fish, which leads to enhanced protection. This
3o protection seems unrelated to the quantity of antibodies
within the circulation system of the fish. Administration
of the same vaccine by injection may lead to enhanced
circulating antibody levels, but apparently its impact at
the cellular level has not been studied.
:35

T/ 4~.~ t n ~n
!V0 92/06599 ~ ~ ° ~ '' 3 ~ fCT/GB91/01828
_ g _
We believe that the oil in a composition of the
invention protects the antigenic components of the vaccine
from degradation in the upper acidic regions of the gut of
the fish, while allowing the antigenic components to be
released in the lower alkaline regions where the oil is
digested enzymatically.
An oral composition of the invention, containing a
vaccine, can be used in place of conventional inject:able
and/or immersion vaccines. Alternatively, a combination
1o
of routes of administration can be employed, for example
by using the oral route to provide a basic level of
protection which can be boosted at an appropriate occasion
(eg. when fish are moved or counted, or at a time of
greater perceived infection risk) by a supplementary
injection or immersion.
Although it is envisaged that a composition of the
invention will generally be administered to farmed fish,
at can also be distributed "in the wild" to reduce the
incidence of fish disease in the natural environment, so
benefiting the indigenous fish population and enhancing
global fish resources.
z5 The oral composition of the invention can be prepared
"on the spat" for immediate administration to fish.
Alternatively, a composition of the invention can be
prepared and packaged in any manner conventionally uses
for commercially-available fish feeds, for example in
3o grease-proof sacks, and supplied as a commercial product.
The shelf-life of the composition can be enhanced, if
necessary, by the incorporation of preservatives, eg. in '
the applied emulsion.

CA 02071974 2001-11-28
_ g _
The invention can be used to administer any fish
vaccine that can induce an immune response via the gut.
For example, the vaccine can be a simple bacterin
composition, ie. a killed whole culture of an infective
organism, or an extract of a killed culture. The vaccine
s
can comprise toxoided components, ie, toxic factors
associated with the infective organism which have been
treated, eg. by chemical means such as formaldehyde or
glutaraldehyde treatment, to reduce their toxic effect
without seriously impairing their antigenic properties.
Where appropriate, the vaccine can comprise live
organisms,.preferably attenuated, eg. by controlled
culture or by genetic manipulation. The active components
of the vaccine can include, or indeed can consist entirely
is of, factors originally identified in the disease-causing
organism but subsequently produced for the purpose of the
vaccine by expression in genetically-modified organisms
such as E.coli.
By way of example only, a composition in accordance
with the invention can be made as follows.
Example 1
25 An approximately 1:1 mixture of whole fish body oil
and diluted aqueous "Furogen" injectable vaccine (an
aqueous composition containing a bacterin derived from
killed Aeromonas organisms) was blended by multiple passes
through an ultrasonic homogeniser, to form a stable creamy
;o water-in-oil emulsion, with the aid of 3~ (total weight)
of "Bolek~K" lecithin emulsifier. "Bolek K" may no longer
be commercially available, but other lecithin emulsifiers
from the "Bolek" range, such as "Bolek M", can be regarded
as identical for the practical purposes of this invention.
3s "Furogen" is available commercially from Aquahealth
i

fVO 92/06599 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PC'f/G~91/01828 ~.'
- 10 -
Limited, Canada and supplied in two formulations: for
parenteral injection and for immersion.
The emulsion was soaked into un-oil.ed conventianal
extruded 3mm diameter fish feed pellets (based on fish
meal and cereal), by pan-coating, using 5% emulsion by
weight of the feed. An additional 2.5% fish oil by weight
was added subsequently to the feed by the same method.
Fish normally consume 1-3% body weight/day, and the
quantity of °'Furogen" was adjusted, by dilution with
crater, to provide a total of about 0.001 ml of the
commercially-supplied injectable composition over a 10-day
trickle feed period.
The resulting composition was physically
indistinguishable from conventional oiled fish feed
pellets, and could be handled and fed to fish.in any
conventional manner, eg. by hand or by mechanical feeders.
sample 2
Trials in Atlantic salmon Salmo salary were
conducted as follows, using oral compositions made as in
2S Example 1, with a control group of fish receiving the
commercially-available injectable composition.
Groins and treatment
3o All fish were 1990 smolts from a commercial salmon
hatchery.
a) 1000 fish; composition of Example 1 containincf
"Furogen" immersion vaccine formulation @ 0.1
ml/fish*.

~~~1~~ 9
'' 'R'~O 92/06599 1P~C.'T/GB91101828
- 11 -
b) 1000 fish; composition of Example 1 containing
"Furogen" injectable vaccine formulation @ 0.1
ml/f ish*.
c) 1000 fish; composition of Example Z containing
"Furogen" immersion vaccine formulation @ 0.01
ml/fish*.
d) 1000 fish; composition of Example 1 containing
''Furogen" immersion vaccine formulation @ 0.001
lfl
ml/fish*.
Control: 750 fish receiving a single dose of °'Fur~gen°' by
injection @ 0.1 ml/fish.
*Total received on average per fish over a lo-day feeding
period.
Method
To identify the groups, all fish were marked using a
panjetter and Alcian blue dye ~4%) before the beginning of
the experiment.
Fish were fed their respective vaccines over a 10-day
period in separate tanks, with a common water supply.
The fish were sample weighed and cultured far
A.salmonicida. Low-level infection was already present,
3o representing a typical on-farm situation. Further
challenge was natural, from the local water supply.
The results are shown in Table 1, and indicate the
percentage cumulative mortality of the trial groups over a
35 one-month period commencing from the start of vaccination.

13'O 92/06599 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ PCTlG1391/~01828 ,., ..
12 -
These results demonstrate that the oral route is an
effective delivery system, and produces results at least
as good as the injection raute. Indeed, the results
indicate that the oral route can enable lo~rer administered
vaccine levels to be used and at the same time induce
enhanced protection.
Table 1
Composition Dose (mljfish) Mortality ~~~)
Control 0.1 15.0
a~ 0.1.. 12.6
b) 0.1 7.0
c, 0.01 12.8
d~ 0.001 1.4
y
25
35

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2071974 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2011-10-18
Grant by Issuance 2006-05-23
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-05-22
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Pre-grant 2006-03-09
Inactive: Final fee received 2006-03-09
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2006-01-23
Letter Sent 2006-01-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2006-01-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-01-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-01-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-01-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-01-18
Inactive: IPC removed 2006-01-18
Letter Sent 2005-10-28
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-09-06
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-08-24
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-04-20
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-10-22
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-10-22
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-01-20
Letter Sent 2002-11-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2002-10-25
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-10-18
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-08-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-11-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-05-29
Letter Sent 1999-09-14
Inactive: Single transfer 1999-07-27
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 1998-12-08
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-10-19
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1998-10-19
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-10-19
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-09-25
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-09-25
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-04-30

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-10-18

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-09-26

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNILEVER PLC
BOOKER AQUACULTURE LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
DENNIS LEADBEATER
MICHAEL EDWARD JOHN BARRATT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2003-01-20 2 51
Abstract 1995-08-17 1 47
Cover Page 1994-04-16 1 14
Claims 1994-04-16 2 56
Description 1994-04-16 12 459
Claims 2001-11-28 2 46
Claims 2004-04-20 1 34
Description 2001-11-28 12 443
Abstract 2006-01-18 1 47
Cover Page 2006-04-26 1 31
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-06-22 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-10-19 1 172
Request for evidence or missing transfer 1998-10-19 1 110
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-11-17 1 114
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-09-14 1 139
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-11-01 1 179
Notice of Reinstatement 2002-11-01 1 168
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-10-28 1 106
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2006-01-23 1 161
PCT 1992-06-19 12 396
Fees 2003-07-04 1 30
Fees 2001-09-06 1 36
Fees 1999-10-06 1 27
Fees 1998-09-24 1 35
Fees 2002-10-25 1 43
Fees 1997-07-10 1 30
Fees 2000-10-03 1 32
Fees 2004-08-05 1 38
Fees 2005-09-26 1 27
Correspondence 2006-03-09 1 24
Fees 2006-09-20 1 28
Fees 2007-07-24 1 28
Fees 2008-10-01 1 35
Fees 2009-10-13 1 35
Fees 2010-09-07 1 35
Fees 1995-07-21 1 34
Fees 1996-09-16 1 26
Fees 1994-07-14 1 32
Fees 1993-06-25 1 23
Courtesy - Office Letter 1998-10-19 1 46