Language selection

Search

Patent 2074017 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2074017
(54) English Title: DENSITY COMPENSATED PIPELINE MONITOR
(54) French Title: APPAREIL DE CONTROLE DENSITOMETRIQUE DES FLUIDES TRANSPORTES PAR PIPELINE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G1N 27/22 (2006.01)
  • G1N 33/28 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • NEUMEISTER, LAWRENCE D. (Canada)
  • WAY, DENNIS K. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • SPARTAN CONTROLS LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • SPARTAN CONTROLS LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1997-01-14
(22) Filed Date: 1992-07-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-01-17
Examination requested: 1995-08-18
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


Apparatus and method for determining the water
content of an oil and water mixture such as is transported
by pipelines and which oil and water may vary in density
from time to time. A densitometer measures the density of
the oil and water mixture in the pipeline and a value for
the dielectric constant of the oil is obtained from the
density measurement by correlating the density reading
with a capacitance or dielectric constant reading from an
empirically generated chart. A basal sediment and water
instrument measures the dielectric constant of the same
mixture. The difference between the two dielectric
constants is then obtained. This result is converted
directly into a water based percentage by volume of the
oil-water mixture being carried by the pipeline.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 13 -
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Apparatus for determining the water content of a
liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture having liquid
hydrocarbons of varying densities comprising means to
measure the density of said liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture, means for obtaining a first dielectric
constant for said liquid hydrocarbon from the non-
linear relationship between said first dielectric
constant and said density of said liquid hydrocarbon
and water mixture, means for measuring the value of
the capacitance of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture, means for obtaining a second dielectric
constant of said liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture
from the value of said capacitance, means for
obtaining the difference between said first and
second dielectric constants and means for converting
said difference between said first and second
dielectric constants to a reading indicating the
water content of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture.
2. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said density
measuring means is a densitometer.
3. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said density
measuring means is a basal sediment and water
monitor.
4. Apparatus as in claim 3 wherein said liquid
hydrocarbon is oil.
5. A method of measuring the water content of a liquid
hydrocarbon and water mixture having hydrocarbons of
varying densities comprising the steps of obtaining

- 14 -
the density of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture, obtaining a first dielectric constant for
said liquid hydrocarbon from the non-linear
relationship between said first dielectric constant
and said density of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture, determining the capacitance of said liquid
hydrocarbon and water mixture, obtaining a second
dielectric constant for said liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture from said capacitance, measuring the
difference between said first and second dielectric
constants and converting said difference to a value
for the water content of said liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 1 207 4017
DENSITY COMPENSATED PIPELINE MONITOR
INTRODUCTION
This invention relates to a cut monitor and,
more particularly, to a cut monitor which utilises density
compensation to obtain the water content of a hydrocarbon
liquid and water mixture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is necessary in many applications to obtain
an indication of the water content of a hydrocarbon liquid
and water mixture such as a petroleum and water mixture.
For example, pipeline operators will ordinarily wish to
ensure that the oil carried by such pipelines has a water
content which does not exceed a certain value. This is so
because the pipeline companies wish to ensure they are not
purchasing water and paying for oil. This is also so
because water can corrode the pipeline which can result in
premature pipeline failure. Water can also freeze in the
pipeline and block flow. This has the potential to close
the pipeline and shut in the oil being carried by the
pipeline.
The maximum amount of water generally allowed in
oil carried by a pipeline is 0.5% of the gross volume of
the oil. In the event such a percentage is exceeded, the
producer may be refused access to the pipeline or
penalised accordingly.
Similarly, oil producers have reasons for
ensuring they too have information concerning the water
content of the oil which they have produced. First, they
may wish to corroborate the water content figures obtained
by the pipeline operator. Second, they may wish to

2074017
-- 2
monitor performance of their water removal equipment and,
third, they may wish to optimize their water removal
processes and equipment so that they meet the standards
required by the pipeline operator but do not substantially
exceed them which can be more profitable for their
operations.
Several previous instruments have been used to
measure the water content of a liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture but each suffers from various disadvantages.
Such instruments include the net oil coriolis meter type
instrument which does not have sufficient accuracy for
measuring small amounts of water because it depends on the
accuracy of mass, density and temperature measurements.
It likewise depends on the hydrocarbon and water densities
remaining constant during operation and that such
densities be established prior to the initiation of
operation of the device. The errors in the readings
obtained by net oil coriolis meter devices can be in the
order of 0.5% water, which errors are in the range or
even greater than the amount of water in the oil-water
mixture which is permitted by the pipeline operator.
Further instruments used in the measurement of
water content in an oil-water mixture include the cut
monitor or basal sediment and water ("BS & W") type
instrument which utilises capacitance to determine the
volume of water in the oil. Such instruments are far more
accurate than the coriolis type instruments for measuring
small percentages of water but they too depend on the
density of the hydrocarbon mixture and temperature
remaining constant although some such instruments do
utilise temperature compensation.
Manual sampling is also used but it suffers from
clear disadvantages, perhaps the greatest of which is that

- - 3 - 2074 0 1 7
it is not a continuous sampling on-line technique.
Automatic sampling gives an average rather than an
instantaneous water cut. Both manual and automatic
sampling require that the sample obtained of the oil and
water mixture be a representative sample.
Instruments known as temperature compensated
basal sediment and water ("BS & W") monitors are also
utilised. A resistance temperature device ("RTD") is used
with the BS & W instrument. The RTD is inserted in and
measures the temperature of the fluid stream. It
calculates the corrected water content using a linear
relationship between the temperature and the dielectric
constant of the oil. In addition to the measurement of
the water content for a mixture of specific density, the
instrument allows four(4) different mixture densities to
be measured by utilising a linear relationship between the
capacitance and the water content. However, it also
suffers limitations in that the density of the mixture
must be known prior to the startup of the apparatus and it
is assumed that the density is constant over time which
may not be correct. The four(4) densities must be close
to each other for good accuracy and an external switch is
required to select the calibrated density closest to that
of the mixture being tested. However, errors still arise
when the density of the mixture differs from the
densities for which the apparatus is calibrated.
To improve the correlation between the
capacitance measurement of the liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture obtained by the BS & W monitor and the
corresponding value for water content percentage of the
mixture being measured, it is noted that errors can
arise. For example, if the liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture is inserted into a capacitance measuring device
and the capacitance measurement obtained is "Yl", the
~.-
~ ...

_ 4 _ 207401 7
percentage water content of the mixture "Xl" is directlyobtained from the linear relationship shown therein.
However, if the density of a second sample of
liquid hydrocarbon changes from the density of the first
sample of liquid hydrocarbon being measured with reference
to Figure 3 as would be the case, for example, where oil
from a different field is being sampled and even though
the water content may be precisely the same in the second
sample, the capacitance can and will change to, say, "Y2".
Correlating the capacitance value of "Y2" to the water
content value will give an erroneous reading of "X2".
Techniques have been adapted in an attempt to
minimize the erroneous readings. For example, different
sets for capacitance tables can be generated depending on
the density of the liquid hydrocarbon intended to be
carried. Again with reference to Figure 3, a second
sample of known density will result in a capacitance
reading of "Y2" and in correlating this value to water
content, it will be found that the correct value of "xl"
will be obtained assuming that the two samples are as
described above; that is, that the two samples have the
same water content. This techn;que, however, is clearly
disadvantageous when the density of the liquid
hydrocarbon-water mixture changes unbeknownst to the
operators.
In capacitance type instruments such as cut
monitor instruments, three variables effect the
capacitance reading, namely the area of the plates between
which the capacitance is taken, the distance between the
plates and the dielectric constant of the material between
the plates. Since the area of the plates and the distance
between them can be held constant by the layout of the
instrumentation, the only remaining factor affecting
.~.
,,~

_ 5 _ 2079 01 7
capacitance is the dielectric constant of the material
being measured between the plates.
The dielectric constant for petroleum changes
depending upon the density of the oil and the temperature
of the oil. As the density of the oil increases, the
dielectric constant increases and as the density
decreases, the dielectric constant decreases. Likewise,
as the temperature of the oil increases,the density
decreases and the dielectric constant therefore decreases.
Since the dielectric constant for oil is
approximately 2.0, depending upon its density and the
dielectric constant for water is approximately 80, as the
water content of the oil increases, the dielectric
constant will also increase.
However, while some previous instruments have
provided compensation for dielectric changes due to
temperature changes and while some instruments have
provided for manual calibration of the instrument
depending on the density of the oil and water mixture
carried by the pipeline, none have provided on-line
compensation for dielectric changes due to density changes
in the oil-water mixture which results by differing oil
compositions. This is clearly disadvantageous since the
product being carried by the pipeline may change
significantly over time thereby resulting in incorrect
readings for the water content of the oil.
A further problem which produced incorrect
readings for the instrument resulted from the previously
incorrect understanding that the capacitance of the oil
was directly proportional to the density. In fact, it has
been found that the relationship is non-linear with the

2074017
result that the oil dielectric constant can be more
accurately determined than previously.
Yet a further problem is set forth herein to
assist a full understanding of the invention. This
problem relates to the dual effect of dielectric constant
changes due to changes in density and temperature. It was
previously thought that two compensations were needed to
obtain capacitance, namely that compensation due to
temperature change and that compensation due to density
change. However, it has been found that temperature
compensation need not be performed for the instrument of
the present invention. Rather, as the density changes in
the oil-water mixture and as the dielectric constant
likewise changes as a result of such density changes, it
appears that temperature compensation itself need not be
performed. It is emphasized that, at the present time,
not enough is known about this phenomena to ensure that
the statements made herein are correct without
qualification but, based upon results to date, it does
appear as if such temperature compensation need not be
made.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the invention, there
is provided apparatus for determining the water content of
a liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture comprising means to
measure the density of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture, means to correlate said density measurement of
said liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture to a first
dielectric constant for said liquid hydrocarbon, means to
measure the capacitance of said liquid hydrocarbon and
water mixture and to convert said capacitance to a second
dielectric constant of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture, means to obtain the difference between said first

2074017
.
and second dielectric constants and means to convert said
difference between said dielectric constants to a reading
indicating the water content of said liquid hydrocarbon
and water mixture.
According to a further aspect of the invention,
there is provided a method of measuring the water content
of a liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture comprising the
steps of determining the density of said liquid
hydrocarbon and water mixture, converting said density
determination to a first dielectric constant for said
liquid hydrocarbon, determining the capacitance of said
liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture, converting said
capacitance to a second dielectric constant for said
liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture, measuring the
difference between said first and second dielectric
constants and converting said difference to a value for
the water content of said liquid hydrocarbon and water
mixture.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
A specific embodiment of the invention will now
be described, by way of example only, with the use of
drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a view of the apparatus according to
the invention in its operating relationship with the
pipeline being monitored;
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic schematic view of the
operation of the water cut monitor according to the
invention;

207~017
. 8 -
Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating the
capacitance of a liquid hydrocarbon and water mixture for
a first and second sample;
Figure 4 is a non-linear curve obtained
experimentally and cross-referencing the dielectric
constant against the density of dry oil measured by the
densitometer;
Figure 5 is a cross-reference chart which
correlates the change in dielectric constant to the actual
water content of the oil; and
Figure 6 is a non-linear curve obtained
experimentally which correlates the change in dielectric
constant to the actual water content of the oil for high
percentages of water in the oil.
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENT
Reference is made to the drawings and, in
particular to Figure 1 which illustrates a pipeline 10
with a liquid hydrocarbon, conveniently oil, flowing
therein. A branch line 11 extends from the pipeline 10
and a densitometer 12 is connected to the branch line 11.
A pump 13 is connected downstream from the densitometer 12
and a basal sediment and water ("BS & W")instrument 14 is
mounted downstream of pump 13 and acts to measure the
capacitance of the oil and water mixture flowing
therethrough. The BS & W instrument 14 returns the oil
and water mixture to the pipeline 10 by way of return line
20. A resistance temperature device ("RTD") 21 may be
utilised to measure the temperature of the oil and water
mixture passing through the BS and W instrument 14 if
desired or necessary.

2074017
OPERATION
In operation and with reference to Figures 1 and
2, an oil and water mixture will generally enter the
densitometer 12 from pipeline 10 through branch line 11.
The densitometer 12 will measure the density of the oil
and water mixture and this result, say d, will then be
correlated with the corresponding value of dielectric
constant, say rd, by the use of the experimentally
generated data illustrated in Figure 4. It will be
noticed that while previously, it was thought that the
relationship between the density of the mixture and the
dielectric constant was linear; that is, a straight line
as opposed to the "two-stage" linear relationship
illustrated in Figure 4, empirical data suggest this is
not the case and, indeed, that considerable error can
arise if a linear relationship is assumed. It will also
be noted that the chart of Figure 4 correlates the density
with the dielectric constant for dry oil; that is, for oil
without measurable water content. While this does
introduce a small error as will be shown in greater detail
hereafter, it has been assumed that the density does not
significantly differ with or without water in the mixture
and that, accordingly, that the value obtained for rd is
appropriate for the applications under which the
instrument is intended to be used and, in fact, this has
been shown to be correct.
The water and oil mixture from densitometer 12
is then moved downstream by the use of pump 13 and into
the BS and W instrument 14 where the capacitance of the
oil and water mixture is measured in the normal way and a
value for the dielectric, rmiX~ is obtained. The value
for rmiX has been found to be the sum of the dielectric of
the oil, rd plus an additional amount, ~ rw, due to the
contribution of the water content as expressed below:

- lO - 207 1 01 7
rmix = rd + ~ rw and, therefore,
~ rW = rmix ~ rd
Since the value for rd is known from reading the density
"d" from densitometer 12 and correlating the density
reading to a value for the dielectric constant rd by
utilising Figure 4 through linearization device 23, the
difference between the two measurements is obtained within
computing device 24 which provides a final value for
change in dielectric ~ rw which is due to the water
content of the oil and water mixture. This value is then
correlated through the use of Figure 5 utilizing
linearization device 23, to obtain the percentage water
content of the oil and water mixture by volume and may be
displayed or recorded as desired by the operator.
In the event the densitometer 12 measures the
density and temperature of the mixture passing
therethrough, and from these measurements internally
calculates a compensated density at a specified reference
temperature, the BS & W monitor 14 will also need to be
temperature compensated. For this purpose, a resistance
temperature device 21 will also be provided to take the
temperature of the fluid stream from the BS & W monitor
14. Temperature compensation utilizing the RTD 21 may be
switched on and off depending upon whether it is to be
used or not.
It will be noted that there is an error
introduced in the measuring process described by the use
of the data appearing on Figure 4 which correlates the
density reading of dry oil against its dielectric
constant. However, it has also been found that the error
at low concentrations of water is insignificant.

- 11 - 2074017
For example, and with reference to Figure 2, it
will be assumed that the density of the oil in the oil
water mixture being measured by the densitometer 12 is 0.8
g/cc and that the density of the water in the oil water
mixture being measured by the densitometer 12 is 1.0 g/cc.
It is assumed that the density of the oil-water mixture
does not change significantly from the density of dry oil
and, accordingly, the densitometer should measure the
density of the oil-water mixture at approximately .8.
With reference now to Figure 4, it will be seen that a
value for the density of 0.8 on the abscissa of Figure 4
correlates to a dielectric constant, rd, of approximately
1.79. This value for rd, therefore, will be entered into
the computing device 13.
Meanwhile, the dielectric constant of the oil
water mixture will also be measured by the BS & W
instrument 14 and this measurement is assumed to be for
the purposes of this example to be 1.83. The value of
1.83 is then taken to be the value for rmiX and by the use
of the equation, ~ rw = rmiX ~ rd, the value for ~ rw is
obtained as follows:
~ rw = 1.83 - 1.79 = .04
The value of the dielectric of .04 is correlated
to water content through the use of Figure 5 thereby
obtaining a value of water content of approximately .72 %
water by volume.
It will be assumed that the density of the
mixture dmiX can be computed as follows:
dmiX = (percent oil) (oil density) +
(percent water) (water density)
= (100% - 0.72%) (0.8) + (0.72~) (l.Oo) = .8014

207~017
_ - 12 -
Thus, there is a slight error that does arise
but the assumption that the change is small is a valid
one.
It will be further noted that there is an error
introduced in the measuring process by use of the
correlation appearing on Figure 5 which correlates
linearly the water component of the dielectric of the
mixture, ~ rw against its water content. It is known that
this relationship is non-linear and exponential in nature
as illustrated in Figure 6. However, it has been found
that the error at low concentrations of water is
insignificant.
While a specific embodiment of the invention has
been described, many modifications will readily occur to
those skilled in the art to which the invention relates
and such description should be taken as illustrative of
the invention only and not as limiting its scope as
defined in accordance with the accompanying claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2024-03-28
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2012-07-16
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Letter Sent 2001-08-07
Grant by Issuance 1997-01-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1995-08-18
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1995-08-18
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-01-17

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 1998-07-16 1998-06-23
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 1999-07-16 1999-05-11
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2000-07-17 2000-07-17
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2001-07-16 2001-07-16
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2002-07-16 2001-07-17
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2003-07-16 2003-05-01
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2004-07-16 2004-06-01
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2005-07-18 2005-04-22
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2006-07-17 2006-07-17
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard 2007-07-16 2007-04-16
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard 2008-07-16 2008-05-08
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - standard 2009-07-16 2009-04-22
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - standard 2010-07-16 2010-07-16
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - standard 2011-07-18 2011-06-30
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SPARTAN CONTROLS LTD.
Past Owners on Record
DENNIS K. WAY
LAWRENCE D. NEUMEISTER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-03-04 1 12
Abstract 1994-03-04 1 24
Claims 1994-03-04 2 51
Drawings 1994-03-04 6 82
Description 1994-03-04 12 410
Cover Page 1997-01-13 1 13
Description 1997-01-13 12 488
Abstract 1997-01-13 1 25
Claims 1997-01-13 2 54
Drawings 1997-01-13 6 86
Representative drawing 1998-08-16 1 10
Fees 2003-04-30 1 31
Fees 2002-04-15 1 38
Fees 2000-07-16 1 34
Fees 1998-06-22 1 40
Correspondence 2001-08-06 3 85
Fees 2001-07-15 1 34
Fees 1999-05-10 1 35
Fees 2004-05-31 1 30
Fees 2005-04-21 1 25
Fees 2006-07-16 1 25
Fees 2007-04-15 1 25
Fees 2008-05-07 1 26
Fees 2009-04-21 1 27
Fees 2010-07-15 1 27
Fees 1997-04-27 1 51
Fees 1995-05-08 2 64
Fees 1996-07-15 1 43
Fees 1995-07-15 1 40
Fees 1994-07-14 1 46
PCT Correspondence 1995-07-15 1 37
Prosecution correspondence 1995-08-22 1 38
PCT Correspondence 1996-07-15 1 27
PCT Correspondence 1996-11-03 1 40
Prosecution correspondence 1995-08-22 3 65
PCT Correspondence 1997-04-20 1 33
Courtesy - Office Letter 1995-08-07 1 15
Courtesy - Office Letter 1995-10-31 1 49
Courtesy - Office Letter 1996-08-18 1 18