Language selection

Search

Patent 2074193 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2074193
(54) English Title: METAL-POWDER BLEND
(54) French Title: MELANGE DE POUDRES METALLIQUES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 33/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAUTZENBERG, NORBERT (Germany)
  • DORWEILER, HEINZ JOSEF (Germany)
  • LINDNER, KARL-HEINZ (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • MANNESMANN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
  • QMP METAL POWDERS GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • MANNESMANN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
  • QMP METAL POWDERS GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-09-16
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1990-09-28
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-07-25
Examination requested: 1997-05-28
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/DE1990/000751
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1991010753
(85) National Entry: 1992-07-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 40 01 900.4 (Germany) 1990-01-19

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention is based on the object to
provide a metal powder mixture which is simple to
manufacture and makes possible the manufacture of
high-strength.and wear-resistant cylinder parts with
low dimensional deviations. This metal powder
mixture is composed of a steel powder which is
obtained by atomizing a melt and is mixed with
0.3-0.7% by wt. graphite, wherein the steel alloy
powder is composed of (% by wt.)
max. ~0.02 ~% C
max. ~0.03 ~% Si
0.05 - 0.25 ~~% Mn
2.5 - 5.0 ~~% Ni
0.2 - 1.5 ~~% Mo
the remainder being iron and the usual
impurities
and the mixture contains finely particulate Cu in an
amount of 0.7-1.5% with the requirement that the
ratio of quantities of Cu:graphite is in the range
of 1.4-2.5.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7
CLAIMS:
1. A method of manufacturing high-strength sintered
parts by sintering compacts which have been manufactured
from steel alloy powder containing Ni additionally
comprising (in % by wt.)
max. 0.02 % C
max. 0.03 % Si
0.05 - 0.25 % Mn
0.2 - 1.5 % Mo
the remainder being iron and the usual impurities wherein
(i) finely particulate Cu in an amount of 0.7-1.5% and
graphite in an amount of 0.3-0.7% have been added to the
steel alloy powder; (ii) the Ni content of the steel alloy
powder which was produced by spraying a steel melt with
water is greater than 2.5 to at most 5.0%; (iii) the ratio
of quantities of Cu:graphite is maintained in the range of
1.4-2.5; and (iv) the sintered parts undergo martensite full
hardening by being cooled in air or under a gas spray
without subsequent heat treatment following sintering.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the Ni
content is maintained in the range of 3.0-4.0%.
3. A metal powder mixture for use in the method
according to claim 1, manufactured from a steel alloy
containing Ni with (in % by wt.)
max. 0.02 % C
max. 0.03 % Si
0.05 - 0.25 % Mn

8
0.2 - 1.5 % Mo
the remainder being iron and the usual impurities, with an
addition of finely particulate Cu in an amount of 0.7-1.5%
and graphite in an amount of 0.3-0.7%, wherein the steel
powder produced by spraying with water has an Ni content of
greater than 2.5 to at most 5.0%, and wherein the ratio of
quantities of Cu:graphite is maintained in the range of 1.4-
2.5.
4. A metal powder mixture according to claim 3,
wherein the Mn content is limited to values of 0.10 to
0.20%.
5. A metal powder mixture according to claim 3 or 4,
wherein the Ni content is limited to 3.0-4.0%.
6. A metal powder mixture according to any one of
claims 3-5, wherein the Mo content is limited to values of
0.5-1.0%.
7. A metal powder mixture according to any one of
claims 3-6, wherein the graphite addition is limited to 0.5-
0.6%.
8. A metal powder mixture according to any one of
claims 3-7, wherein the ratio of Cu:graphite is 2.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02074193 2002-04-30
20337-414
1
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING HIGH-STRENGTH
SINTERED PARTS AND METAL POWDER MIXTURE
The invention relates to a method of manufacturing
high-strength sintered parts by sintering compacts which
have been manufactured from a steel alloy powder containing
Ni additionally comprising (in % by wt.)
max. 0.02 % C
max. 0.03 % Si
0.05 - 0.25 % Mn
0.2 - 1.5 % Mo
the remainder being iron and the usual impurities, wherein
(i) finely particulate Cu in an amount of 0.7-1.5% and
graphite in an amount of 0.3-0.7% have been added to the
steel alloy powder;(ii) wherein the Ni content of the steel
alloy powder which was produced by spraying a steel melt
with water is greater than 2.5 to at most 5.0%; (iii) the
ratio of quantities of Cu:graphite is maintained in the
range of 1.4-2.5; and (iv) the sintered parts undergo
martensite full hardening by being cooled in air or under a
gas spray without subsequent heat treatment following
sintering.
Additionally, the invention also relates to a
metal powder mixture for use in the method of the present
invention manufactured from a steel allay containing Ni with
(in % by weight)
max. 0.02 % C
max. 0.03 % Si

CA 02074193 2002-04-30
20337-414
la
0.05 - 0.25 % Mn
0.2 - 1.5 % Mo
the remainder being iron and the usual impurities, with an
addition of finely particulate Cu in an amount of 0.7-1.5%
and graphite in an amount of 0.3-0.7%, wherein the steel
powder produced by spraying with water has an Ni content of
greater than 2.5 to at most 5.0%, and wherein the ratio of
quantities of Cu: graphite is maintained in the range of 1.4-
2.5.
A steel alloy powder for manufacturing high-
strength sintered parts is known from EP 0 136 169 B1. The
steel alloy powder is composed of (% by wt.)
max. 0.02 % C
max. 0.1 % Si
0.4 - 1.3 % Ni
0.2 - 0.5 % Cu
0.1 - 0.3 % Mo
max. 0.3 % Mn
max. 0.01 % N
the remainder being iron and the usual impurities.

2~~t~~.~
(~:f r. _ 2 _
1 This alloy powder is to be inexpensive to
2 manufacture and to process, is to have good pressing
3 properties, and is to ensure a high strength in the
4 sintered finished part. The reference does not
discuss in detail the properties of the finished
6 part with respect to the obtainable accuracy to size
7 of the finished part.
8 When a compact manufactured of steel
9 powder is sintered, its geometry usually changes.
This is called shrinkage due to sintering. This
11 effect is counteracted by martensitic hardening
12 essentially because of the attendant increase in
13 volume due to structural transformation. Of course,
14 a volumetric change of the finished part compared
to
the compact used for sintering can also be taken
16 into consideration when dimensioning the pressing
17 die, i.e., it is attempted to anticipate the
18 dimensional deviations and to compensate the
19 deviations by changing the dimensions of the compact
from the beginning. However, this was only very
z1 incompletely achieved in the past, not only because
22 the relative dimensional deviations depend on the
23 respective wall thicknesses of the compact, but also
24 because the relative dimensional deviations are
significantly influenced by the density obtained in
26 the compact which is subject to significant
27 variations within the same compact and also between
28 individual compacts which are otherwise the same.
29 Consequently, the efforts for obtaining a
dimensional constancy in the sintered finished part
31 of finished alloy materials have in the past only
32 resulted in a reproducible limitation of the
33 dimensional deviations in the most favorable case
to
34 values of approximately 0.1%. Such deviations are
no longer tolerable for many parts. For this
36 reason, sintered parts are frequently subjected to
37 a final calibration procedure which is very
38 expensive. However, this calibration procedure
39 cannot even be carried out in hardened parts because
of the hardness of the sintered parts.
G:\MJM\3245158P.PAT

r.:.
,. . ., -2A-
1 A sinter alloy in which the Ni content is at most
2 2.5% is known from EP 0 042 654. This content is of
3 significance in connection with the Mo content for
4 the possibility of air hardening. However, the
highest limit of 0.7% Mo disclosed in this reference
6 cannot be carried out. In this alloy, the improved
7 strength is obtained by a special heat treatment
8 after sintering.
G:\MJM\3245158P.PAT

CA 02074193 2000-11-14
3
It is the object of the invention to provide a metal
powder mixture which is as simple as possible to manufacture
and permits the manufacture of high-strength and wear-resistant
sintered parts whose dimensional deviations can be kept within
a tolerance range having a width of at most tD.05% without
requiring additional structural measures in the pressing tool
for the manufacture of compacts to be sintered. Accordingly,
it should be a property of the metal powder not to result in
significant shrinkage or growth when compacts manufactured by
conventional compacting are sintered.
This object is met by a method and a metal powder
mixture having the features recited above. Advantageous
further developments of this mixture are the preferred Mn
content of the mixture is 0.10 to 0.20%, the preferred Ni
content of the mixture ~is 3.0 to 4.0%, the preferred Mo content
of the mixture is 0.5 to 1.0%, the preferred graphite content
is 0.5 to 0.6% and the preferred ratio of Cu:graphite is 2.
Contrary to the steel alloy powder known from EP 0
136 169 B1, the present invention provides that the Cu content
is not already introduced in the alloy used for atomizing, but
is admixed in finely distributed form to the steel powder. In
addition, in accordance with the invention, the quantitative
contents of the individual alloy elements are maintained within
different limits than in the known steel powder. It is
25~ particularly important that the ratio of the Cu content
relative to the graphite content which is also introduced into
the metal powder mixture in powder form as carbon is maintained
in the range of 1.4-2.5, preferably 2Ø When observing all
requirements of the invention, it is surprisingly possible to
manufacture compacts by using the usual compressing procedures
of powder metallurgy which, again under the usual sintering

CA 02074193 2000-11-14
3a
conditions, have almost complete dimensional constancy
independently of the wall thicknesses of the compacts. The
dimensional deviations are less than ~0.05.

. .
... ;
When the sintered parts are cooled in air
or by means of a gas shower (for example, inert gas
supplied under pressure) arranged in the cooling
zone of a sintering =urnace, a completely
martensitic structure is obtained in the sintered
parts which imparts a high-strength (more than
750 N/mmZ) to the parts without requiring a
subsequent heat treatment.
The invention shall be described in more
detail with the aid of the following example.
A steel powder having the following
composition (% by wt.) was produced by water
atomizing of a melt.
0.01 % C
0.02 % Si
0.10 % Mn
4.0 % Ni
0.5 % Mo
0.020 % P
0.010 % S
the remainder being iron and the usual
impurities.
After water atomizing of the melt, the
steel powder was dried and subjected at
approximately 1,000°C to reduction annealing in an
Hz atmosphere. After cooling, the resulting
agglomerate was ground into fine particles. The
residual oxygen content of the steel powder was
approximately 0.15% and its apparent density was
approximately 3 g/cm3.
Subsequently, added to this steel powder
were 0.60% graphite powder and 1.0% finely
G:\MJM\3245158P.PAT

._,
particulate Cu as well as about 1% conventional
lubricants. After these components were uniformly
mixed, compacts were produced by cold pressing in
the conventional manner, wherein the density of the
compacts was approximately 7 g/em3.
After the compacts were sintered at
approximately 1,120°C, the finished parts had
dimensional deviations of less than ~0.03% relative
to the dimensions of the compact. When cooled under
a nitrogen shower after sintering, the parts were
completely martensitically hardened and had a
tensile strength of more than 820 N/mm2 with a
hardness of approximately 400 HB.
In another test with the metal powder
mixture according to the invention, the compacts
were subjected to a two-fold pressing and sintering
procedure with temperature stages of 800°C and
1,120°C. Again, the two sintering procedures
resulted in dimensional deviations of less than
0.03%. The tensile strength was approximately
900 N/mm2, and the hardness approximately 450 HB.
The advantages of the metal powder mixture
according to the invention are to be seen
particularly in the fact that dimensionally constant
sintered parts can be manufactured which do not
require any complicated mechanical, deforming, or
thermal after-treatment after sintering, and wherein
the steel powder can be manufactured inexpensively.
This is because the selected alloy according to the
invention can be water atomized with subsequent
reduction under H2 atmosphere. Expensive vacuum
annealing, as it is required in other finished-
G:\MJM\324515$P.PAT

,:-
r..; . ,
1 alloy, water-atomized metal powders for the same
2 use, is not required. Also, in addition to the
3 inexpensive manufacture, the metal powder mixture
4 results in excellent strength and wear properties.
G:\MJM\3245158P.PAT

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2074193 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2009-09-28
Letter Sent 2008-09-29
Grant by Issuance 2003-09-16
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-09-15
Inactive: Final fee received 2003-06-19
Pre-grant 2003-06-19
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-03-20
Letter Sent 2003-03-20
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-03-20
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2003-03-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-04-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-10-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-09-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-03-16
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-02-19
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-02-09
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2001-01-25
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2001-01-25
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-11-14
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2000-11-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-05-11
Inactive: Multiple transfers 1999-02-02
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1997-06-10
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1997-06-10
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1997-06-10
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1997-05-28
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-05-28
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-07-25

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-08-15

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MANNESMANN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
QMP METAL POWDERS GMBH
Past Owners on Record
HEINZ JOSEF DORWEILER
KARL-HEINZ LINDNER
NORBERT DAUTZENBERG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2003-08-13 1 33
Cover Page 1994-04-30 1 15
Abstract 1994-04-30 1 73
Description 1994-04-30 6 171
Claims 1994-04-30 2 53
Abstract 2000-11-14 1 20
Description 2000-11-14 9 240
Claims 2000-11-14 2 60
Description 1994-05-01 7 190
Abstract 1994-05-01 1 21
Description 2002-04-30 9 239
Claims 2002-04-30 2 57
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1997-06-10 1 170
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-03-11 1 117
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2003-03-20 1 160
Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-11-10 1 171
International preliminary examination report 1992-07-17 13 367
Correspondence 2003-06-19 1 33
Fees 1996-08-22 1 77
Fees 1995-08-22 1 73
Fees 1994-08-15 1 73
Fees 1993-08-13 1 38
Fees 1992-07-17 1 37