Language selection

Search

Patent 2077568 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2077568
(54) English Title: GRINDING TOOL
(54) French Title: MEULE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B24B 7/00 (2006.01)
  • B23F 21/02 (2006.01)
  • B24D 5/06 (2006.01)
  • B24D 18/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PICKERT, WERNER (Germany)
  • LOESCH, KLAUS (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • KAPP & CO. WERKZEUGMASCHINENFABRIK
(71) Applicants :
  • KAPP & CO. WERKZEUGMASCHINENFABRIK (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1992-09-04
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-03-06
Examination requested: 1993-02-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
(P 41 29 486.6) (Germany) 1991-09-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the Disclosure
A shaped grinding tool has a base body with
a working zone for producing the shape of a
workpiece. Abrasive grains made of a highly
refractory material are galvanized to the working
zone in a single layer. The abrasive grains form
grinding edges spaced at a defined distance from
one another in the circumferential direction of
the grinding tool. The grinding edges have a
width that is less than four times the diameter of
an individual abrasive grain. The service life of
the grinding tool is increased and the efficiency
of the grinding process is improved.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WHAT WE CLAIM IS:
1. A shaped grinding tool comprising:
a base body having a working zone for
producing the profile of a workpiece; and
abrasive grains made of a highly
refractory material and galvanized to said working
zone in a single layer, said abrasive grains
forming grinding edges spaced at a defined
distance from one another in the circumferential
direction of said grinding tool, said grinding
edges having a width that is less than four times
a diameter of an individual one of said abrasive
grains.
2. A shaped grinding tool according to
claim 1, wherein said grinding edges are straight.
3. A shaped grinding tool according to
claim 2, wherein said grinding edges are
positioned at an acute angle relative to a radial
direction of said shaped grinding tool.
4. A shaped grinding tool according to
claim 1, wherein said grinding edges are arc-
shaped.
5. A shaped grinding tool according to
claim 1, wherein a distance between adjacent ones
of said grinding edges is 1.0 to 6.0 mm.
- 11 -

6. A shaped grinding tool according to
claim 1, wherein said highly refractory material
is selected from the group consisting of diamond
and CBN.
- 12 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~7~
GRINDING TOOL
The present invention relates to a grinding
tool with a single layer of abrasive grains
galvanized to the base body.
When manufacturing components of a high
qualit~ standard, for example, such as toothed
wheels and other workpieces with special profiles,
it is becoming more and more important for
achieving high precision and trueness to shape to
perform a further fine machining (finishing) step
after premachining and hardening. The fine
machining or finishing step for hardened
workpieces is commonly a grinding step.
When finishing hardened workpieces by so-
called shape-grinding a grinding tool such as a
grinding wheel is used that in the case of
grinding of toothings is provided with a profile
that corresponds to the profile of the gap between
the teeth to be ground. As a grinding material
(a~rasive material) of the grlnding tool in modern
fine machining steps of hardened materials
diamond, cubic-crystalline boronitride (CBN) or
other hlghly refractory materials are commonly
used.
The profile of the grinding wheel is

2~
conventionally produced such that the grinding
tool is sub~ected to a planing process in which,
for example, with a diamond planing roller the
grinding tool is profiled. Recent grinding
processes however employ a grinding tool which is
comprised of a base body that has been ground to
conform to the desired profile and which is
provided with a singla layer of abrasive grains.
The fixation of the abrasive grains on the base
body is achieved by a galvanic process whereby
commonly nickel is used as a binding material.
When CBN is used as the abrasive material the
average diameter of an abrasive grain dependlng on
the desired grindlng depth is typically between 20
and 600 ,um.
Usually the surface area of the base body to
which the abrasive grains are to be applied is
essentially entirely planar so that the abrasive
grains applied in a single layer and galvanically
connected thereto have the appearance of the
surface of a fine-grain abrasive paper. However,
it is known from U.S. patent 4,114j322 and German
Offenlegungsschrift 27 58 285 to provide the base
body with a plurality of grooves which, among
other things, serve to improve transport of the

2~ 7~
cooling lubricant necessary for the grinding
process to the respective grinding location.
It is known in the prior art to provide at
least segments of the grinding wheel such that,
when viewed under the microscope, they have a
plurality of abrasive grains ad;acent to one
another and galvanically connected to the base
body in order to thus form a grinding surface.
Accordingly, there are always at least islands or
segments present which provide the conventional
structure of a grinding wheel surface.
When such a grinding tool is used, the
cutting operation is performed with a
geometrically undefined cutting edge, i.e., the
individual abrasive grains remove microcuttings
from the surface of the workpiece. The
microcuttings are caught within a free space in
front of the abrasive grain essentially
corresponding to the space between ad~acent
abrasive grains before the microcuttings are
removed by the cooling lubricant or, in the case
of dry grinding, removed by the centrifugal forces
acting at the surface of the grinding tool.
With the known grinding tools it is thus an
accepted fact that the free space which is

necessary for an efficient cutting process is
statistically distributed, in other words, that it
is randomly formed during the course of the
galvanic fixation process of the abrasive grains
on the base body.
Experiments with galvanically bonded grinding
wheels however have shown that of the plurality of
abrasive grains distributed on the base body only
a few projecting abrasive grains actually
participate in the cutting process and that the
corresponding free space of the abrasive grains is
very important for a high service life of the
tool.
It is therefore an ob~ect of the present
inventlon to provide a shaped grinding tool with
a single layer of abrasive grains connected
galvanically to the base body which in comparison
to known tools exhibits a greater service life and
a more efficient cutting process. This means that
a tool shall be provided with which a great number
of workpieces with a high relative cutting volume
per time unit (number of removed cubic millimeters
of materlal per second of cutting time and per
millimeter of grinding wheel width) may be
manufactured.

~ r-;;
Brief Description of the Drawings
This ob~ect, and other ob~ects and advantages
of the present invention, will appear more clearly
from the following specification in con~unction
with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e
representation of a grinding
wheel;
Fig. 2 is an enlarged detail of the
working zone of a grinding
wheel with abrasive grinding
edges of a single file
arrangement;
Fig. 3 is a detailed view
corresponding to the
representation of Fig. 2
with abrasive grinding edges
of a three-file arrangement;
Fig. 4 is a further representation
of the working zone of a
grinding wheel with straight
and radial orientation of
the abrasive grain edges;
Fig. 5 is a representation
corresponding to Fig. 4 with

Z~ 6~
an abrasive grinding edge
extending at an acuts angle
relative to the radius
orientation;
Fig. 6 is a further repreaentation
with an arc-shaped extension
of the abrasive grinding
edge: and
Fig. 7 shows a different
arrangement of an abrasive
grinding edge.
Summary of the Invention
The shaped grindlng tool of the present
invention is primarily comprised of a base body
having a working zone for producing the profile of
a work piece, and abrasive grains made of a highly
refractory material and galvanized to the working
zone in a single layer, the abrasive grains
forming grlnding edges spaced at a defined
distance from one another in the circumferential
direction of the grinding tool, the grinding edges
having a width that is less than 4 times a
diameter of an individual one of the abrasive
grains.
Due to the fact that in contrast to the known

2~
grinding tools segment-type grinding surfaces with
a plurality of ad~acently arranged abrasive grains
are no longer present, but a defined abrasive
grlnding edge made of a single file (row~ or up to
four rows of abrasive grains, it is ensured that
only effectively usable abrasive grains are
present at the surface of the base body. In front
of the abrasive grains, viewed in the
circumferential direction, a large free space is
now provided because no further abrasive grains
are galvanically bonded to the surface so that
thereby an optimal cutting process is possible.
The orientation of the abrasive grain
grinding edges, independent of the fact whether
there is a single file (row) abrasive grinding
edge or an abrasive grinding edge comprised of
four files, i.e., corresponding to four grain
diameters, is preferably straight in the radial
direction over the surface of the base body.
According to a further feature of the invention it
is also provided that the abrasive grinding edges
extent straight, but positioned at an acute angle
relative to a radial dlrection of the shaped
grinding tool.
On the other hand, it may be advantageous

2~7~
that the grinding edges are not straight but
curved, for example, corresponding to an arc-
shaped curve.
The distance between the individual abrasive
grain grinding edges in the circumferentlal
direction depends on the type of the workpiece
material to be ground, on the hardness of the
workpiece, and on the circumferential velocity
with which the grinding tool operates. Preferably
the distance between two grinding edges is
approximately 1.0 to 6.0 mm.
The highly refractory material to be used as
the abrasive grains is preferably diamond or CBN.
Descrlption of Preferred Embodiments
The present invention will now be described
in detail with the aid of several specific
embodiments utilizing Figures 1 through 7.
The shaped grinding tool is comprised of a
base body 1 which, at its working zone 2 used for
producing the workpiece profile, already exactly
conforms to the desired profile. The cutting
material, i.e., the abrasive grains are made of
dlamond, C8N or any other highly refractory
material which is galvanically bonded in the form
of abrasive grinding edges to the working zone 2

2~7 ~
of the base body 1. An abrasive grinding edge 3
is comprised of one or a plurality of grain rows,
see Figures 2 and 3. The distance x between two
adjacent grinding edges 3 is preferably 1.0 to 6.0
mm. The width b of a grinding edge 3 is smaller
than 4 times the diameter of the individual
abrasive grains.
The grinding edges 3 are usually radially
oriented (Figs. 2, 3 and 4); however, they may
also be arranged at an acute angle 4 relative to
the extension of the grinding tool radius (Fig.
5). In addition to a straight arrangement of the
grinding edges 3 an arc-shaped (Fig. 6) or an
arrangement on any other line (Fig. 7) is
possible.
By replacing the previous full-surface
coating of the working zone 2 of the base body 1
with grlnding edges 3 spaced at a defined distance
from one another, oriented grinding edges, that
are distributed over the circumference of the
grinding tool such as to conform to the particular
cutting process, and defined corresponding free
space~ are provided. The grlnding edges result in
an lmproved (better defined) cutting process. On
the one hand, the directly arranged free spaces

2~ 8
prevent hydroplaning effects when using cutting
oils, and, on the other hand, provide for a more
efficient removal of the cuttings.
The present invention is, of course, in no
way restricted to the specific disclosure of the
specification and drawings, but also encompasses
any modifications within the scope of the appended
claims.
-- 10 --

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1995-03-04
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1995-03-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1994-09-05
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1994-09-05
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-03-06
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1993-02-17
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1993-02-17

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1994-09-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KAPP & CO. WERKZEUGMASCHINENFABRIK
Past Owners on Record
KLAUS LOESCH
WERNER PICKERT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-03-06 1 14
Abstract 1993-03-06 1 14
Claims 1993-03-06 2 29
Drawings 1993-03-06 2 30
Descriptions 1993-03-06 10 224
Representative drawing 1998-09-08 1 8
Courtesy - Office Letter 1992-12-04 1 25
PCT Correspondence 1993-01-08 1 25
Courtesy - Office Letter 1993-05-17 1 49
Prosecution correspondence 1993-02-17 1 19
Prosecution correspondence 1993-04-15 5 101
Examiner Requisition 1993-11-23 2 58