Language selection

Search

Patent 2079894 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2079894
(54) English Title: BLASTING APPARATUS
(54) French Title: SABLAGE PAR JET AMELIORE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B24C 3/00 (2006.01)
  • B24C 7/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KIRSCHNER, LAWRENCE (United States of America)
  • LAJOIE, MICHAEL S. (United States of America)
  • SPEARS, WILLIAM E., JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CHURCH & DWIGHT COMPANY, INCORPORATED
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: AVENTUM IP LAW LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1991-04-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-10-07
Examination requested: 1993-01-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1991/002332
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1991015336
(85) National Entry: 1992-10-05

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
505,918 (United States of America) 1990-04-06

Abstracts

English Abstract

2079894 9115336 PCTABS00007
Conventional industrial pressure blasting apparatus (8) is
modified to allow a controlled pressure on the blast pot that is
greater than the pressure on the line where the media and air are mixed
for conveying the mixture to the nozzle and then to the
workpiece. A media control device (18), with a fixed but readily variable
area, is placed between the blast pot (10) and the media/air
mixing line (20) to meter the media flow and maintain the pressure
differential between the blast pot and the line. This allows
control of the media flow when low flow rates, below about 10 pounds
per minute, are required.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
-9-
What is claimed is:
1. In a blasting apparatus for delivering
a blasting medium comprising fine particles having a
mean particle size of from about 50 to 1000 microns,
including:
a pressure vessel containing said
blasting medium;
a source of compressed air for
entraining the blasting medium, in fluid
communication with the pressure vessel;
a conveying line, in fluid
communication with the source of compressed air and
with the pressure vessel and wherein the blasting
medium and a stream of compressed air are mixed;
a nozzle in connection with the
conveying line and through which the mixture of
compressed air and blasting medium are discharged;
an air line connecting the conveying
line and the pressure vessel to the source of
compressed air; and
an exit line connecting the pressure
vessel to the conveying line;
the improvement comprising:
sensor means connected to the exit
line and to the conveying line, for monitoring the
pressure differential there- between;
pressure regulator means connected to
said sensor means, wherein said pressure regulator
means includes separate pressure vessel pressure
regulator means in connection with the air line and
conveying line pressure regulator means in
connection with the conveying line, for regulating
pressure within the pressure vessel and the
conveying line and for maintaining a positive,

WO 91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
-10-
preselected pressure differential between the
pressure vessel and the conveying line.
2. The blasting apparatus of claim 1
wherein the sensor means monitors the pressure
vessel at the exit line in connection therewith.
3. The blasting apparatus of claim 1
wherein the blasting medium has a mean particle size
of from about 250 to 300 microns.
4. The blasting apparatus of claim 1
wherein the blasting medium is sodium bicarbonate.
5. The blasting apparatus of claim 1,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
between 1.0 and 5.0 psig.
6. The blasting apparatus of claim 1,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
between 2.0 and 4.0 psig.
7. The blasting apparatus of claim 1,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
selected to maintain a uniform flow rate through the
nozzle.
8. The blasting apparatus of claim 7,
wherein said uniform flow rate is between 0.5 and
10.0 pounds per minute of blasting medium.
9. A method for blasting, comprising the
steps of:
containing a quantity of blasting
medium comprised of fine particles having a mean
particle size of from about 50 to 1000 microns
within a pressure vessel;
pressurizing said pressure vessel by
providing fluid communication between said pressure
vessel and a source of pressurized air;
feeding said blasting medium from said
pressure vessel, through an exit line to a conveying

WO 91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
-11-
line, said conveying line being in fluid
communication with said source of pressurized air
through an air line;
mixing said blasting medium with the
stream of pressurized air flowing within said
conveying line;
sensing the pressure differential
between said pressure vessel and said conveying line;
maintaining said pressure differential
at a preselected level such that the pressure level
within said pressure vessel is greater than the
pressure within said conveying line;
discharging said mixture of blasting
medium and said stream of pressurized air through a
nozzle at the end of said conveying line.--
10. The blasting method of claim 9,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
between 1.0 and 5.0 psig.
11. The blasting method of claim 9,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
between 2.0 and 4.0 psig.
12. The blasting method of claim 9,
wherein said preselected pressure differential is
selected to maintain a uniform flow rate through
said nozzle.
13. The blasting method of claim 9,
wherein the blasting medium has a mean particle size
of from about 250 to 300 microns.
14. The blasting medium of claim 9,
wherein the blasting medium is sodium bicarbonate.
We Claim:
15. A method for blasting, comprising the
steps of:

WO 91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
-12-
containing a quantity of blasting
medium comprised of fine particles having a mean
particle size of from about 50 to 1000 microns
within a pressure vessel;
pressurizing said pressure vessel by
providing fluid communication between said pressure
vessel and a source of pressurized air;
feeding said blasting medium from said
pressure vessel, through an exit line to a conveying
line, said conveying line being in fluid
communication with said source of pressurized air
through an air line;
restricting the flow of said blasting
medium to said conveying line at a flow rate of from
about 0.5 to 10 pounds per minute through an orifice
having a predetermined area and which is situated in
said edit line;
mixing said blasting medium with the
stream of pressurized air flowing within said
conveying line;
sensing the pressure in said pressure
vessel and said conveying line;
controlling the pressure in said air
line and in said conveying line to provide a
pressure differential such that the pressure level
within said pressure vessel is greater than the
pressure within said conveying line;
regulating said pressure differential
in proportion to the flow of blasting medium through
said orifice to provide a blasting medium-to-air
ratio in the conveying line of between about 0.05
and 0.25 by weight; and

WO 91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
-13-
discharging said mixture of blasting
medium and said stream of pressurized air through a
nozzle at the end of said conveying line.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the
blasting medium has a mean particle size of from
about 250 to 300 microns.
17. The method of claim 15 wherein the
blasting medium comprises sodium bicarbonate
potassium bicarbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, sodium
chloride or mixtures thereof.
18. The method of claim 15 wherein the
pressurized air pressure is between about 20 to 125
psig.
19. The method of claim 15 wherein the
pressure differential is between about 1 and 5 psi.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein the
pressure differential is between about 2 and 4 psi.
21. The method of claim 15 wherein the
flow rate of blasting medium through the orifice is
between about 0.5 to 5 pounds per minute.
22. The method of claim 15 wherein the
orifice has an opening corresponding to the area
provided by circular orifices of about 0.063 to
0.156 inch diameter.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein the
orifice is circular.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


` wos1~1s336 P~/US91/02332
1-- 2 . ~ ~ 3 ~ ~
IMPROVEMENT IN BLASTING APPARATUS
- This invention relates to improved apparatus for
directing fine particles in a compressed air stream
toward a workpiece.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
- Standard sand blasting equipment consists of a
pressure vessel or blast pot to hold particles of a
blasting medium such as sand, connected to a source
of compressed air by means of a hose and having a
means of metering the blasting medium from the blast
pot, which operates at a pressure that is the same
or slightly higher than the conveying hose
pressure. The sand/compressed air mixture is
transported to a nozzle where the sand particles are
accelerated and directed toward a workpiece. Flow
rates of the sand or other blast media are
determined by the size of the equipment.
Commercially available sand blasting apparatus
typically employ media flow rates of 20-30 pounds
per minute. About l.2 pounds of sand are used
typically with about l.0 pound of air, thus yielding
a ration of l.20.
When it is required to remove coatings such as
paint or to clean surfaces such as aluminum,
magnesium, plastic composites and the like, less
aggressive abrasives, including inorganic salts such
as sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate, can be
used in conventional sand blasting equipment. The
medium flow rates required for the less aggressive
abrasives is substantially less than that used for
sand blasting, and has been determined to be from
about 0.5 to about l0.0 pounds per minute, using
similar equipment. This requires a much lower
medium to air ratio, in the range of about 0.05 to
0.25.
.' . . ' .
.
. '

.
WO91/15336 P~T/US91/02332
2r~n ~ 2-
However, difficulties are encountered in
maintaining continuous flow at these low flow rates
when conventional sand blasting equipment is
employed. The fine particles of a medium such as
sodium bicarbonate are difficult to convey by
pneumatic systems by their very nature. Further,
they tend to agglomerate upon exposure to a
moisture-containing atmosphere, as is typical of the
compressed air used in sand blasting. Flow aids
such as hydrophobic silica have been added to the
bicarbonate in an effort to improve the flow, but a
substantially uniform flow of bicarbonate material
to the nozzle has not been possible up til now.
Sporadic flow of the blasting media leads to erratic
performance, which in turn results in increased
cleaning time and even to damage of somewhat
delicate surfaces.
Thus it is desired to have a blasting apparatus
that can deliver the blast media at a uniform rate
that can be controlled in a predictable manner, at
flow rates yielding a medium-to-air ratio of between
about 0.05 and 0.25 oy weight, using a configuration
similar to conventional commercially available sand
blasting equipment.
. .
' ' :
,

WO91/15336PCTJUS91/02332
:''
2~'~'
-3-
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A conventional blasting apparatus is
modified to provide a separate source of line air to
- a blast pot through a pressure regulator to provide
a greater pressure in the blast pot than is provided
to the conveying hose. This differential pressure
is maintained by an orifice having a predetermined
area situate between the blast pot and the conveying ~-
hose. This orifice provides an exit for the blast
medium and a relatively small quantity of air from
the blast pot to the conveying hose, and ultimately
to the nozzle and finally the workpiece. The
differential air pressure, typically operating
between l.0 and 5.0 psi with an orifice having an
- appropriate area, yields acceptable media flow rates
~ in a controlled manner.
' : ' .
.
: . . . . , .. , ~ . ~ , . . -
- - : . - . - . . . . ....

:'
WO91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
z .r~ 3 ` `;
--4--
: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Figure l illustrates a blasting apparatus
modified in accordance with the present invention.
; Figures 2 and 3 are graphs of media flow
rate versus pressure.
- ~
-
,
. ,. '

.; : : :
WO 91/lS336 PCI`/US91/02332
~, ~$5~
-5-
DETA I LED DE SCR I PT I ON OF THE I NVENT I ON
In order to feed fine particles of a
material such as a bicarbonate having a mean
particle size of from 50 to 1000 microns, preferably
from about 250 to 300 microns, at a uniform rate,
pressures within the blast pot, including the blast
hose pressure, must be positive with respect to the
nozzle. Pressures are typically in the range of
about 20-125 psig.
Since the blast pot and the conveying hose
operate at about the same pressure, the flow of
blast media in conventional sand blasting equipment
is controlled by gravity feed and a metering valve.
We found that the blast pot was under a small
differential pressure with respect to the blast
delivery hose pressure, which fluctuated between
positive and negative; the result was that the flow
rates of the blast media fluctuated also in response
to the differential pressure changes. Further
according to the invention, a differential pressure
gauge is installed between the delivery hose and the
blast pot to monitor the differential pressure
directly. The pressure can be closely controlled by
means of a pressure regulator at any hose pressure
from 10 to 125 psig or higher, depending on the
supply air pressure. The present invention
eliminates this source of flow rate variation and
also modifies conventional equipment to handle blast
media at low flow rates of about 0.5 to 10 pounds
per minute, preferably up to about 5 pounds per
minute.
The invention will be described by
reference to Figure 1. Although the blast media
illustrated is sodium bicarbonate, other blast media
~: , - ~. . . ~ -. :- ,. . .

WO9l/15336 PCT/US91/02332
7~
.
such as potassium bicarbonate, ammonium bicarbonate,
sodium chloride and other water-soluble salts are
meant to be included herein.
Referring to Figure 1, blast apparatus 8
includes a blast pot 10, partially filled with blast
media 12. The blast pot 10, suitably having a
cavity of about 6 feet, terminates in a media
exit line 14 governed by a valve 16. The medium
control area, typically but not limited to an
orifice plate 18, further restricts the flow of the
media 12 to the desired flow rate. A line 20 is
connected to a source or pressurized air (not shown)
which is monitored with an inlet of monitor 22. Air
valve 24 is a remotely operated on/off valve that
activates the air flow to the nozzle and the opening
and closing of the media cut off valve. Nozzle
pressure regulator valve 26 regulates the nozzle
pressure by means of a monitor 28 when the system is
in operation. Nozzle pressure regulator valve 26
can maintain the desired nozzle pressure. The
nozzle pressure monitor 28 enables a controlled
pressure to be applied to the nozzle 30, suitably
having a throat diameter of about 0.5 inch. The
differential pressure gauge 32 monitors the pressure
between the blast pot 10 and the conveying hose 34.
The pot pressure regulator 36, measured by gauge 38,
is used to provide a pressure higher than the
pressure in the conveying hose 34, thus allowing the
differential pressure to be monitored by
differential pressure gauge 32. Optional equipment
for protection of and cooling of the workpiece and
the control of dust is provided by a water injection
line 40, which injects water to the nozzle 30.
. . ~
,
-
' .
.

WO91/1S336 PCT/US91/02332
2~
--7--
In operation, the blast media 12 is fed
through media exit line 14 and the valve 16 to an
orifice plate 18, which regulates the flow of media
to the compressed air line 20. The orifice openings
can vary from about 0.063 to about 0.156 inch
diameter, or openings corresponding to the area
provided by circular orifices of 0.063 to 0.156 inch
diameter. Preferably the openings correspond to
about a 0.125 inch opening for sodium bicarbonate
media having a mean particle size of about 70
microns, and 0.156 inch opening for a media having a
mean particle size from about 250 to about 300
microns. A positive pressure of between about 1 to
5 psig, preferably about 2 to 4 psig, between the
media e~it line 14 and the conveying hose 34 is
maintained at all times. A source of compressed air
is also fed to the air line 20, regulated by the
valves 24 and 26 to the desired air pressure and
nozzle pressure, respectively, which preferably is
between about 1~ to about 125 psig. The pot
pressure regulator 36 controls the pressure to the
top of the blast pot 10, further ensuring a
controlled and uniform flow of blast media 12. The
manometer or other differential pressure gauge 32
measures the differential pressure, which is
proportional to the amount of media flowing through
orifice 18. The blast media, compressed air and
water are delivered to the nozzle 30 and ejected
toward the workpiece (not shown) at a uniform and
controllable rate.
A stream of sodium ~icarbonate media at a
pressure of 64 psig and feed rate of about 2 pounds
per minute, nozzle pressures of psig and water
pressure of 200 psi, was directed at painted
- .
: : - , . :: . , . . ~
- : ~, . . . : :
-., ".
; . :;. ~ -

WO91/15336 PCT/US91/02332
~à~ù'mlnum panels 2 feet by 2 feet by 0.032 inch thick
situate 18 inches from the orifice of the nozzle.
The panels were depainted and all corrosion products
removed in four minutes, with no damage to the
aluminum panels.
Figure 2 is a graph of media flow rate of
from 1 to 5 pounds per minute versus different
pressures in psi varying from 1 to 5 psi. The data
points were made using a sodium bicarbonate medium
having a mean particle size of about 65 microns, a
- nozzle pressure of 60 psi and an orifice opening of
- 5/32 inch. It is apparent that the media flow
varies linearly with pressure.
Figure 3 is a graph of media flow rate in
pounds/min versus different pressure in psi using a
sodium bicarbonate media having a mean particle size
of 250 microns. Again, the media flow varies
? linearly with different pressures.
The present apparatus has an added benefit
in that surface corrosion is removed at the same
time as the coating, eliminating separate hand
sanding or solvent dissolution techniques. Further,
the present apparatus removed paint and other
coatings efficiently and effectively from the
surface of delicate metal parts, including areas
around seams, rivets, screws, and the like, that
heretofore required separate, special techniques.
The system can be used efficiently and controllably
with robotics.
.. . .
.
.. . . ~ - :.
'
: "

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2079894 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1993-10-04
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1993-10-04
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1993-04-05
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1993-04-05
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1993-01-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1993-01-15
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-10-07

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1993-04-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CHURCH & DWIGHT COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Past Owners on Record
LAWRENCE KIRSCHNER
MICHAEL S. LAJOIE
WILLIAM E., JR. SPEARS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1991-10-07 5 161
Cover Page 1991-10-07 1 17
Drawings 1991-10-07 2 90
Abstract 1991-10-07 1 39
Abstract 1991-10-07 1 55
Descriptions 1991-10-07 8 241
Prosecution correspondence 1993-01-15 1 26
Courtesy - Office Letter 1993-06-16 1 25
International preliminary examination report 1992-10-05 9 157