Language selection

Search

Patent 2088965 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2088965
(54) English Title: SELF-CLEANING NOZZLE FOR A GAS WELDING TORCH
(54) French Title: BUSE AUTONETTOYANTE POUR CHALUMEAU
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B23K 9/16 (2006.01)
  • B23K 9/29 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TAKACS, DONALD E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1993-02-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-08-19
Examination requested: 2000-01-20
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
837,482 (United States of America) 1992-02-18
961,467 (United States of America) 1992-10-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


Docket 7501-C
SELF-CLEANING NOZZLE FOR A GAS WELDING TORCH
Abstract of the Disclosure
A welding torch for gas metal arc welding has a torch body which
conducts electricity, receives a cable for directing a welding wire, and
defines a passage for directing a shielding gas. A conductor tube has
an inner end portion secured to the torch body and a free outer end
portion, and a contact tip is secured to the outer end portion of the
conductor tube. The contact tip has a central bore which directs the
welding wire through the tip, and a diffuser directs the shielding gas
around the contact tip and conducts electrical power to the contact tip.
A tubular welding nozzle body is formed of a porous polycrystalline
graphite material and has a slightly tapered inner surface which
surrounds the contact tip for collimating the gas while substantially
reducing the accumulation of spatter on the nozzle body. The contact tip
may also be covered with the same graphite material to impede spatter
accumulation, and the porous graphite material is impregnated with
petrolatum and wax to extend the service life of the body. The tubular
nozzle body may be protected by a surrounding copper jacket, and an
interfitting band of ceramic material retains the body within the jacket.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Docket 7501-C 10
CLAIMS:
1. A welding nozzle adapted for use on a gas shield welding torch
having an outlet end portion, comprising a tubular nozzle body having an
inner surface defining an internal gas passage and including an inner end
portion and an outer end portion, means for removably attaching said
nozzle body to the outlet end portion of the welding torch, said nozzle
body comprising a substantial portion of polycrystalline graphite having
open pores extending to said inner surface, and said polycrystalline
graphite body being impregnated with a material which releases through
said pores to said inner surface in response to the heat from welding for
significantly reducing the accumulation of weld spatter on said nozzle
body and for substantially extending the service life of said nozzle.
2. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 therein said nozzle body
comprises at least ninety percent polycrystalline graphite by volume.
3. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said impregnated
material comprises polycrystalline wax, and said wax expands through said
pores in response to heat.
4. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 3 wherein said impregnated
material also includes petrolatum.
5. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said inner surface
increases in diameter towards said outer end portion of said nozzle body
and forms a taper of about 1.5 degrees relative to the axis of said body.
6. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said inner end
portion of said polycrystalline graphite nozzle body has external
threads, a sleeve threadably connected to said inner end portion, and
means for removably attaching said sleeve on the outlet end portion of
the welding torch.
7. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 and including a tubular
metal jacket surrounding said polycrystalline graphite nozzle body, means
for connecting said nozzle body to said metal jacket, and said connecting
means provide for greater expansion of said metal jacket relative to said

Docket 7501-C 11
nozzle body while retaining said body within said jacket.
8. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 7 wherein said connecting
means comprise a ring of ceramic material disposed within opposing
grooves formed in said jacket and said body.
9. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 7 wherein said metal jacket
and said nozzle body define therebetween a channel, and said impregnated
material extends into said channel.
10. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said polycrystalline
graphite body has a rounded outer end surface.
11. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 10 and including a tubular
metal jacket surrounding said nozzle body, said jacket having a tapered
outer end surface, and said end surface of said nozzle body projects
slightly beyond said end surface of said jacket.
12. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 11 wherein substantially all
of said nozzle body is confined within said metal jacket for protecting
said body.
13. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 and including a tubular
metal jacket surrounding said nozzle body, said attaching means includes
a tubular metal sleeve connected to said jacket, and a tube projecting
laterally from said metal sleeve for directing a blast of compressed air
into said internal passage and along said inner surface of said nozzle
body.
14. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said nozzle body has
a total porosity of closed and open pores from 18 to 40 percent by
volume, and said open pores are from 64 to 95 percent of said total
porosity to provide for retaining and controlled release of said
impregnated material.

Docket 7501-C 12
15. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 where said polycrystalline
graphite nozzle body comprises primarily particles having a size ranging
from 5 to 25 microns, and the size of said open pores ranges from 0.8 to
3 microns.
16 A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said polycrystalline
graphite body has a hardness on a Shore Scleroscope within the range of
40 to 75.
17. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 1 wherein said impregnated
polycrystalline graphite body has a thermal conductivity between 80 and
100 watts/mxK.
18. A welding nozzle adapted for use on a gas shield welding torch
having an outlet end portion, comprising a tubular nozzle body having an
inner surface defining an internal gas passage and including an inner end
portion and an outer end portion, means for removably attaching said
nozzle body to the outlet end portion of the welding torch, said nozzle
body comprising a substantial portion of polycrystalline graphite having
open pores extending to said inner surface, said inner surface increases
in diameter towards said outer end portion of said nozzle body, a tubular
metal jacket surrounding said polycrystalline graphite nozzle body, means
for connecting said nozzle body to said metal jacket and providing for
greater expansion of said metal jacket relative to said nozzle body, and
said polycrystalline graphite body being impregnated with a material
which releases through said pores to said inner surface in response to
the heat from welding for significantly reducing the accumulation of weld
spatter on said nozzle body and for substantially extending the service
life of said nozzle.
19. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 18 wherein said impregnated
material comprises polycrystalline wax, and said wax expands through said
pores in response to heat.
20. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 18 wherein said connecting
means comprise a ring of ceramic material disposed within opposing

Docket 7501-C 13
grooves formed in said jacket and said body.
21. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 18 wherein said metal jacket
and said nozzle body define therebetween a channel, and said impregnated
material extends into said channel.
22. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 18 wherein said
polycrystalline graphite body has a rounded outer end surface, said
jacket has a tapered outer end surface, and said rounded outer end
surface of said nozzle body projects slightly beyond said end surface of
said jacket.
23. A welding nozzle adapted for use on a gas shield welding torch
having an outlet end portion, comprising a tubular nozzle body having an
inner surface defining an internal gas passage and including an inner end
portion and an outer end portion, means for removably attaching said
nozzle body to the outlet end portion of the welding torch, said nozzle
body comprising a substantial portion of polycrystalline graphite having
open pores extending to said inner surface, said inner surface increasing
in diameter towards said outer end portion of said nozzle body and
forming a taper of about 1.5 degrees relative to the axis of said body,
said body having a rounded outer end surface, and said body being
impregnated with a material which releases through said pores to said
inner surface in response to the heat from welding for significantly
reducing the accumulation of weld spatter on said nozzle body and for
substantially extending the service life of said nozzle.
24. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 23 wherein said impregnated
material comprises polycrystalline wax, and said wax expands through said
pores in response to heat.
25. A welding nozzle as defined in claim 24 wherein said impregnated
material also includes petrolatum.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Docket 7501-C
~s,~
SELF-CLEANING NUZ LE FOR A GAS WELDIN~ ~ORCH
~3sk9L-ound of the Inye~t-io~
The present invention relates to gas metal arc welding torches of
the general type disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents No. 2,769,894,
No. 2,836,705, No. 3,048,691 and No. 3,226,526, and more specif;cally,
to welding nozzles which are used on torches for gas metal arc welding.
There are three conventional methods of Gas Metal Arc Welding,
previously known as Metal Inert Gas (MIG), for transferring welding wire
to the weld. These methods are globular, short arc, and spray transfer.
Globular type metal transfer across the arc occurs in large, irregular
shaped droplets. This type of metal transfer commonly uses shielding
gasses consisting of COz mixtures and has a disadvan-tage in that it
produces an erratic arc and generates considerable weld spatter. In the
short arc method of metal transfer, no me-tal transfers across the arc.
Instead, metal transfer occurs when the electrode wire makes contact with
the metal being welded. Shielding gases commonly used with this process
are welding grade COz, argon-C0z mixtures and argon-oxygen mixtures.
Although this type of metal transfer reduces the amount of weld spatter
generated by the arc, spatter is still a major problem.
Spray type metal transfer is accomplished by the movement of a
stream of small droplets across the arc fram the electrDde to the metal
piece being welded. This type of metal trans~er usually employs
relatively high voltages and currents. The shielding gases used for this
type of weld transfer are usually argon-CO2, argon-oxygen or a
combination of argon-CO2-oxygen. Spray type metal transfer produces the
leas-t amount of weld spatter of the three basic techniques, but this

Docket 7501-C 208896~
method requires careful control o~ the shie'lding gas mixture. Without
proper control, or due to an inexperienced operator or antiquated
equipment, ~ven spray type metal transfer can produce we'ld spatter in the
same magnitude as the g'lobular and short arc welds.
When producing a MIG weld in an inert environment, the molten
material or spatter adheres to the nozzle. The spa-tter is made-up of the
elements found in both the piece being welded, and the weld-in~ wire~ e.g.
iron, aluminum and silicon. The instant ~ou stop the we'ld, the shie'lding
gas dissipates leaving this semi-molten material exposed to the
atmospheric gasest mainly oxygen. ~he oxygen reacts chemically to the
molten steel, allowing iron and aluminum oxides to form on the inside
bore of the welding nozzle. These highly abrasive materials are ground
into the surfaces of the nozzle during cleaning, causing the nozzle to
degrade rapidly.
As indicated above, a common problem to each of these basic welding
processes is weld spatter. ~ne widely used solution throu~hout the MIG
welding industry is to secure a copper welding nozzle to the torch body.
The problem with copper welding nozzles is that during the welding
process, molten metal or weld spatter, which can ~each a temperature of
10000 F. or more7 impacts and etches the copper. The constan-t
bombardment of weld spatter erodes the copper and allows the spatter to
adhere to the nozzle. Once spatter begins to attach to the nozzle, it
will continue to buildup and eventually restricts the ~low of shielding
gas to the weld. The result is a Plawed weld.
Usually a flawed weld occurs before the spatter buildup is
detected. As a resu'lt, the welded ;tem is rejected and must be either
discarded or rewelded7 which is time consuming and increases the cost af
manufacturing the item. ~o correct the problem, the operator typically
removes the copper nozzle from the ~elding torch and dislodges the
spatter by scraping it off with a sharp metal edge of a tool such as a
screwdriver or chisel. Cleaning the copper nozzle in this manner usually
reduces the working life of the nozzle because deep scratches and gouges
are left by the cleaning tool. In addition, after the nozzle has been
sub~ected several times to spatter removal in this manner, its ability
to obstruct spatter buildup diminishes.
Copper nozzles also present a problem because copper is classified

Docket 7501-C 3 208~96~
as a ha~ardous material and cannot be discarded in ordinary land-Fills.
Thus the copper nozzles are not easily disposed of and rnust be recycled.
A more significant problem with the use of copper nozzles is the
generation of smoke. The smoke results from an anti-spatter cornpound
which is applied to the copper noz~'le to inhibit the bui'1dup o-f' weld
spat-ter. When the compound is subjected to the high temperatures
associated with welding7 smoke is generated. For environmental reasons,
it is desirable to reduce the amount of smoke which is generated by most
industrial processes.
Summary of the Inven-tion
The present invention is directed to an improved welding nozzle
or nozzle assembly which impedes and substantially reduces the buildup
of weld spatter. The improved nozzle is relatively inexpensive to
produce and is easily mounted on the outer end portion of a welding torch
such as a conventional torch for gas metal arc welding. ~he torch
typically includes a torch body defining a central passage for directing
a welding wire, a shielding gas and electrical power therethrough. A
conductor tube defines an internal passage and has an inner end portion
mounted on the torch body and a free outer end portion. A tub'ular
contact tip has a central bore and is secured to the outer end portion
of the conductor tube. The conductor tube directs the welding wire
through the center bore of -the contact tip, the shielding gas around the
contact tip and the electrical power through the contac-t tip.
In accordance with the present invention, a welding nozz'le includes
an elongated tubular body having a rounded outer end surface and an inner
surface with a 1.5 degree taper for de-f;n;ng an in-ternal bore or passage.
The body is formed of a porous polycrystal'line graphite material which
is vacuum or pressure impregnated with petrolatum and wax. In one
embodiment, the body is threadably connected to a metal support sleeve
which has an insulator liner, and in another embodiment, the body is
protected by a surrounding copper jacket. The graphite body is retained
within the jacket by an interfitting band of ceramic material. In a
further embodiment, the contact tip is covered by the porous
polycrystalline graphite material, which is also irnpregnatedt blasts of
compressed air are used to dislodge any accumulation of spa-t-ter on the

Docket 7501-C 4 2 0 8 8 9 fi ~
graphite material.
Other features and advantages of the invent;on will be apparent
from the following description7 the accompanying drawing and the appended
claims.
1l ~f~E~ri~iQn of ~he D~ g~
FIG. l is a schematic axial section view o-f a welding torch having
a polycrystalline graphite nozzle constructed in accordance with the
present invention;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged fragmentary section of a second embodiment
of a polycrystalline graphite nozzle constructed in accordance with the
invention;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged fragmentary section of the graphite nozzle
mounted on the welding torch shown in FIG. 1 and with a modification; and
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary section of the graphite nozzle shown in
FIG. 1 and in combination with a modified contact tip and an air blast
port.
Description,,of the Preferred En~odiments
FIG. 1 illustrates a conventiona'l gas metal arc welding torch 10
which typically includes a metal torch body 12 defining a central passage
14 for rece-iving a shielding gas. A helical wound wire cable 16 extends
within the center of the passage 14 for directing a welding wire 18 which
is fed through the passage 14. The torch body 12 also forms a conductor
for electrical power, and a surrounding tubular insulator 22 extends
substantial'ly the fu'll length of the torch body. The torch 10 also
includes a metal conductor tube 24 which defines an internal passage 26
and has an inner end port;on 2~ and a second free or outer end portion
30. The inner end portion 28 has a spline connection 34 with the torch
body 12 and is secured to the body by a tubular nut 36.
A contact tip 38 (FIGS. 1 ~ 2) has a central bore 40 and is
threaded into a tubular gas diffuser 42 which is threaded into the outer
end portion of the conductor tube 24. The gas diffuser 42 has a set of
passages including radial passages 44 for directing the shielding gas
flowing through the conductor tube 24, and the wire cable 16 directs the
we'lding wire 18 through the gas diffuser 42 and through the center bore

Docket 7501-C 5 2088~6~
40 wi-thin the contact tip 38. The sh;elding gasses flow axially around
the gas diffuser 42 outwardly and around the contact tip 3~ tD encase the
welding wire 18 as it exi-ts the contact tip. Electrical power is also
conducted through the conductor tube 24, the gas di-ffuser 12 and to the
contact tip 3~.
Referring to FIG. 2, a tubular weldlng nozzle or nozzle assembly
is constructed in accordance w;th the inven-tion and includes a
cylindrlcal sleeve 48 which is preferably Formed of copper. The sleeve
48 is lined with a glass filled phenolic or silicone glass insulator
sleeve 49 which is press-fitted into the copper sleeve and mounts on the
conductor tube 24. The liner sleeve 49 cooperates with the diffuser 42
to define an annular gas chamber 50 for receiving the gas flowlng through
the ports 44. An internally threaded brass sleeve 51 is press-fltted
into the insulator sleeve 49 and threads onto the outer end portion of
the conductor tube 2~. A tubular nozzle body 52 is formed of a porous
polycrystalline graphite material and has an inner portion threaded into
the sleeve 48. The nozzle body 5? has an inner bore or surface 53 which
tapers outwardly and surrounds the contact tip 38 to define therebetween
an annular passage 56 for directing the shielding gas outwardly in a
collimated flow around the contact tip 38 and the welding wire 18. The
inner surface 53 has a taper of about 1.5 degrees, and the body 52 has
a rounded outer end surface 54. The nozzle assembly 45 may be removed
from the conductor tube 24 by unthreading the assembly ~5 from the
conductor tube.
~5 One particular polycrystalline graphite material used to form ~he
nozzle body 52 and which effectively impeded the accumulation of weld
spatter on the body was a G-10 and G-20 polycrystalline ~raphite sold by
Graphite Engineering and Sales Co. of Greenville, Michigan. Another
polycrysta~line graphite ma-terlal which produces highly desirable results
is made by Poco Graphite, Inc. ln Decatur, Texas and sold as Grade PGCS-
3. This porous polycrystalline graphite material has an apparent density
~rom 1.64 to 1.80 grams per cubic centimeter and a total porosity ranging
from 18 to 40 percent by volume. The material has a hardness within the
range of 45 to 75 on the Shore Scleroscope, and -from 64 to 95 percent of
the total porosity is formed by open pores. The graphite particles
forming the body 52 have a size ranging from 5 to 25 microns, and the

Docket 7501-C 6 20~9~
size of the open pores ran~es from 0.~ to 3 microns.
While the porous polycrys-talline graphi-te nozzle body 52 has proven
extremely effective in impeding the accumulation of weld spatter on the
nozzle, when weld spatter does begin to accumula-te on-the nozzle body 52,
the spatter may be easily removed by merely wiping the nozzle body with
a leather welding glove.
It has also been found very desirable to ;mpregnate the porous
polycrystalline graphite nozzle body 52 with an impregnating material
such as 90% petrolatum and 10% polycrystalline wax, by weight, This
material is heated in a pressure vessel to a -temperature between about
350 F. and 375 F. to form a fluid ba~h. The graphite nozzle body is
submerged into the bath and the vessel is pressurized at 30 psi for a
period of about seven minutes. The impregnating material displaces the
air in the open pores of the body and prevents moisture from entering the
pores. When the nozzle budy heats up during a welding operation, the
nozzle body begins to excrete the impregnating material at a tempera-ture
of approximately 200 F. to 300 F. This causes the inner and end
surfaces of the nozzle body to become slippery and thereby be
continuously self-cleaning.
An impregnated polycrystalline graphite nozzle body produced in
accordance with the invention has proven to be extremely superior when
compared with conventional copper nozzle bodies. That is, the
impregnated nozzle body not only results in a low coefficient of surface
friction which minimizes the buildup of spatter bu-t has a high
temperature rating and withstands thermal shock, all of which provide for
a significantly longer service life. For example, in one welding
operation, an impregnated nozzle body provided a continuous serv;ce life
of 18 weeks as compared to less than one day for a copper nozzle body.
The prevention or minimizing of spatter buildup also enables the
shielding gas to be more precisely controlled, and -the tapered inner
surface collimates the gas in the passage 56 and directs -the gas -towards
the weld. This has resulted in a reduction of the amount of welding gas
required by about 40 percent. Another important advantage of the
polycrystalline graphite nozzle body is the reduction of smoke generated
3~ by the welding process and the reduction in the pollution of the
environment. As mentioned above, the smoke is a by-produc-t of the anti-

20889~
Docket 7501 C 7
spatter compound commonly applied -to a copper nozzle during the we'lding
process. The impregnated graphite nozzle body as described above use
significantly less impregna-tiny ma~erial and substantially redwces the
amount of smoke generated.
FIGS. 1 and 3 illustrate another embodiment of the invention. In
this embodiment, a nozzle assembly 60 includes a metal s'leeve 48 lined
with an insulator sleeve 49 which receives the internally threaded sleeve
51, as described above. In this embodiment, a nozzle body 62 is -formed
of a porous polycrystalline graphite material as used in forming the
nozzle body 52, and the inner surface of the body 62 has a 1.5 degree
taper to define the diverging passage 64. The graphite body 62 is
confined within a surrounding copper shell or jacket 6~ having an inner
portion 69 with external threads for threadably engaging the outer end
portion of the copper sleeve 48.
The graphite body 62 has a rounded outer end sur-face 72 which
projects slightly from a tapered or chamfered end surface 73 on the
jacket 68. The inner surface oF the copper jacket 68 and the outer
surface of the graphite body 62 are provided with opposing annular
channels or grooves which are filled with a ceramic material to form an
inter connecting rigid band 76. One ceramic material which has been used
for effectively securing the graphite body 62 to the surrounding shell
or jacket 68 is produced by Cotronics in Brooklyn7 New York, and sold
under the trademark ZIRCONIA 904 adhesive. This ceramic material is
supplied in a fluid form and is injected into the grooves through a hole
78 extending through the copper jacket 68. A diametrical'ly opposed vent
hole 81 is also formed ;n the jacket 68 to vent air from the grooves when
the ceramic material is injected and allow the grooves to be filled.
A~ter the grooves are filled to form the ring or band 76, the
material is heated to approximately 200 F. by heating the nozzle assembly
60 within an oven or with the use of a heat ~un. The heat expels the
mois-ture from the adhesive so that the adhesive cures to form the
interlocking rigid band 76. This band has been found highly desirable
in view of the fact that the thermal expansion rate for the copper jacket
68 is 2 to 4 times higher than that of the graphite body 62. Thus when
the copper jacket 68 expands during the welding operation, the ceramic
band 76 retains the graphite body 62 and prevents it from sliding out of

208896~
Docket 7501-C
-the jacket.
The nozzle assembly 60 shown in FIG. 3 is -the same as the no~le
assembly 60 shown in FIG. 1 except -that the nDzzle assembly shown in
FIG. 3 includes another set of opposing circumFerential grooves which
define an annular chamber 85. After the ~raphite body 62 is impregnated
with petrolatum and wax in the same manner as described above for Lhe
nozzle body 52 the nozzle body 62 is assembled into the surrounding
copper sleeve or jacket 68 and connected by the ceramic ring or band 78.
The nozzle body 62 is then impregnated again to fill the annular chamber
85 with the petrolatum and wax. This impregnation o-f the graphi-te body
62 significantly extends the self-cleaning ability of the nozzle body.
FIG. 4 illustrates a modification of the nozzle assembly 60 shown
in FIG. 1. In FIG. 4 a nozzle assembly 125 includes a contact tip 126
which is covered by a contact tip cover 128 formed oF a polycrystalline
graphite material which is the same material forming the nozzle bodies
52 and 62. The tip cover 128 includes a cylindrical por-tion 131 which
surrounds the contact tip 126 and has a semi-spherical ou-ter end surface
with a center bore 134 for receiving the weld wire 18. ~he tip cover 128
is also impregnated in the same manner as the bodies 52 and 62 and
inhibits spatter from adhering to the contact tip 126 during welding
operation. The tip cover also prevents the welding wire from burning
back and welding itself` to the contact t;p 126.
The nozzle assembly 125 also includes an air blast tube 136 which
defines a port 137 connected to the chamber 50 by a hole 138 within the
sleeve 48 and liner sleeve 49. The air blast tube 136 is connected by
a flexible tube 144 to a source (not shown) of cDmpressed air controlled
by a conventional solenoid valve 146 within an air supply line 147. In
operation of the FIG. 4 embodiment at the completion of each weld1 the
solenoid valve 146 opens and d-irects a blast of compressed air from -the
source through the line 144 and tube 136. When the blast of compressed
air flows into chamber 647 it cleans any weld spatter callected on the
graphite nozzle body 62 and/or contact tip cover 128 during the welding
operation.
While -the forms of welding no~zles herein described constitute
preferred embodiments of the invention it is to be understood that the
invention is not to be limited to these precise forms of nozzles and

Docket 75Ql-C 9 2088965
that changes may be made -therein w-ithout deparLing from -the scope and
spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
The inven-tion having been described, the following is claimed:

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2005-02-07
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2005-02-07
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-02-05
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2004-01-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-07-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-04-03
Letter Sent 2000-02-10
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2000-02-10
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2000-02-10
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-01-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2000-01-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-08-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-02-05

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-01-22

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1998-02-05 1998-01-22
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1999-02-05 1999-01-22
Request for examination - standard 2000-01-20
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2000-02-07 2000-01-21
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2001-02-05 2001-01-22
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2002-02-05 2002-01-22
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2003-02-05 2003-01-22
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Past Owners on Record
DONALD E. TAKACS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-08-03 1 20
Cover Page 1994-01-20 1 16
Abstract 1994-01-20 1 27
Claims 1994-01-20 4 151
Drawings 1994-01-20 1 63
Description 1994-01-20 9 381
Reminder - Request for Examination 1999-10-06 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2000-02-10 1 180
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2004-04-01 1 175
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2004-04-07 1 167
Fees 2003-01-22 1 32
Fees 2000-01-21 1 29
Fees 1999-01-22 1 29
Fees 2001-01-22 1 29
Fees 2002-01-22 1 26
Fees 1998-01-22 1 38
Fees 1997-01-22 1 34
Fees 1996-01-22 1 36
Fees 1995-01-20 1 40