Language selection

Search

Patent 2093724 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2093724
(54) English Title: OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH A POWER LIMITER FOR HIGH-ENERGY PULSES
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE COMMUNICATION OPTIQUE A LIMITEUR DE PUISSANCE D'IMPULSIONS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G02F 01/35 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CHESNOY, JOSE (France)
  • PFEIFFER, THOMAS (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • ALCATEL SEL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
(71) Applicants :
  • ALCATEL SEL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1993-04-08
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-10-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
92 04 505 (France) 1992-04-13
P 42 29 292.1 (Germany) 1992-09-02

Abstracts

English Abstract


- 9 -
Abstract
Optical Communication System with a Power
Limiter for High-Energy Pulses
In optical communication systems with optical with optical amplifiers,
there is the danger of system components being damaged
in the event of a break in the fiber-optic link,
e.g., due to fiber breakage.
This can be explained by the emission of high-energy
pulses.
To prevent such pulses from propagating in the fiber-
optic link, a power limiter which, by introducing
attenuation, limits the optical power of the pulses
to a value not dangerous to the system components
is inserted in the fiber-optic link. The attentuation is
provided by two-photon absorption.
(Fig.1)


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. A communication system for transmitting an optical
signal over an optical waveguide (5), comprising at
least one optical amplifier (1), an electrical-to-op-
tical transducer (2) at the transmitting end, and at
least one optical-to-electrical transducer (3) at the
receiving end,
c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n
that the opticak transmission path includes a power
limiter (4) whose absorption coefficient increases with
increasing optical input power.
2. A communication system as claimed in claim 1,
characterized in that the power limiter (4) is a sec-
tion of doped optical waveguide made of an absorbing
material wherein the absorption is a two-photon process.
3. A communication system as claimed in claim 2,
characterized in that the absorbing material is
neodymium, Nd.
4. a communication system as claimed in claim 2,
characterized in that the absorbing material is
thulium, Tm.
ZPL/S-He/Ke/Lo T. Pfeiffer 6
05.04.93

- 2 -
5. A communication system as claimed in claim ?,
characterized in that the power limiter (4) is a sec-
tion of optical waveguide wherein a light-absorbing
and semiconducting material is distributed in the form
of microcrystallites, and wherein the absorption is
a two-photon process.
6. A communication system as claimed in claim5,
characterized in that the absorbing material is a semi-
conductor material of the type II-VI.
7. A communication system as claimed in claim 6,
characterized in that the absorbing material is cad-
mium telloride, CdTe.
8. A communication system as claimed in claim 7,
characterized in that the light-absorbing and semicon-
ducting material has a band gap corresponding to a wave-
length between 750nm and 1550 nm.
9. An optical amplifier for a communication system as
claimed in any one of the preceding claims,
c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n that the power
limiter and the optical amplifier form a unit.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


372~
Optical Communicatior~ Syst~m w;th a Power
lirr,itcr for High-~nergy Pulses
The pres~rt inv~tion re!ates to an opticaL communica-
tion system as sc~t forth in the preamble of claim 1.
Such system~ are known, e.g., frc,m a. Wedding et al,
"10 Gbit!s to 260000 Sub,cribers Using Optical Amplifier
D;str;bu.ion Net,~ork", Contribution for ICC/Supe~comm
'9~, Opti~a~ Commurlicatic)ns 300 Level Session, "Impact
o~ Opt;cal Am~liFiers or, ~etwork Architectures".
In such ofticdl comrnunication systems, ;n which the trans-
mission llnk is ~ fiber-optic link, optical amplifiers
serve to a.~plify optical iignals transmitted through
the Optical wave~3uides.
The opti~a' amplifier chosen ;n the embodiment described
below ;5 a fiber-optic amp'ifier. A fiber-opt;c ampl;-
fier -is s~o~n in EP O 457 34~ A2, for examPle.
In such fiber-opi~ic amplifiers, erb;urn ions with which
a sect;on .~f optical waveguide is doped are raised from
a ground s tate to an exc ited state by pump light
em;tted b~ a pumf) sourcc~ and from the excited state,
the ions drop back, throlgh e;ther spontaneous or stimu-
lated emissiorl, to th~ ground state. The st;m~lated emis-
sion is e~ited oy the optical signal to be amplified,

~3~
whirh tra~els thtowgh the section of doped optical wave-
gu;rle. Th ~pont~neou~; emiss;on is also amplif;ed ;n
the doped ~;ection o~ opt-ical ~aveguide; this amplified
spontaneou ~mi~ion (A5~) causes the noise internal
to a fiber-opti(: amplifie~
In the ab~e-menlionec' syste~, there is the danger that
;n the ev~,;t of a break -in the fiber-optic l;nk,
e.g., du~ tc fit,er br~ak3~e or to separat;on of a f;be~-
optic con-,e~t~r, s~stem components, such as pho~od;odes,
will be da!naged.
This carl l~? eYplained as foLlo~s:
As a re~u~ of the break ;n the fiber-optic link,
the powe~ input to the op~ical amplifier decrea~es to
zero. Since the pumping process ;s independent of the power
input, er,ergy will be pumped ;nto the dooed oDt;cal-waveouide
section even if the power ;nput has dropped, so th~t com-
plete populc,t;on ;nversion w;ll occur. When light
which re~ul~s from sp-)ntaneous emiss;on and is reflect-
ed at thc interf~ce o~ the break in the fiber-
opt;c l1n~ i)asse~ ~hro~lgh the section of doped optical
wave~uide,whose active l~ser medium, e.g., erb;um ;ons,
;s ;n the -invert~d stat~, the stored enerc~y will be
suddenly re~eas~d. High energy pulses w;ll be emitted
which are a danyer to s~stem components.
These g;ant pul~es oropagate both in and opposite to the
direct;ol, Df signal tlow. In the case of erb;um-doped
fiber-optic ampl;fiers, the wavelength of the gi~nt
pulses is ~n the range between 15Z0 nm and 1570 nm.

_ 3 _ ;~372~
Such fit)el~-()ptic a~plifi~rs are not only used in optical
communica~ion ~stems~ ine~ are also employed in assem-
blies ~1 Iro~isional setu~)s which are provided for the
start-up ~J~ s~ch s~stems to permit measurements, tests,
or step~ st~p installation. Reflecting surfaces may be
intention,.lly or u~inten~ionally inse~ted in these set-
ups and mil~ tnen cause back reflection of the light
amplificd ~, the amplifier. Such reflecting surfaces
are formei~ ln particular by a connect;ng element or a cut-
off end of t1n optical waveguide.
An optica~ ampli~ier witl, a section of doped optical
waveeu;de mây h.lve such a high gain that, if subjected,
for exam~.!e, to unintentional back reflection, it will
turn into 3 Lase~ GSCi llator due to a phenomenon called
"Q-switchlr;y". ~hiC, too~ ~uses hi~h-energy pulses
wh;ch nldy ~anlaQe system components. A known solution to
the probl-r~ of how to avoid such daraage consists of
insertin3 or,e or more op~ical isolators in the optical
transmissicn path. These isolators can transmit l;ght ;n
only one direction, whereby back reflect;ons are prevent-
ed. Thus, t~,e optical amplifier can be prevented from
operatin~ as a laser oscil~ator. OPtical isolators are
the p~ssi e components with the highest complexity and,
thus, the ri~hest price in a system or an optical ampli-
fier with GptiCa l waveguide.
It is the o~ject of the in~ention to prov;de an optical
communic~;ior~ ~yst~m co~r;sing optical amplifiers where-
in th~ da~;~er of s,stem comPonents being damaged by high-
energ~ ~u~ies i~ a~oided.

~37~l~
Th;s Oi~ je~:L i.~ a~.tainr:(i as set forth i.n claim 1 Further
advantar~r~ous as~ct-s of ~he invention are defined in
the subclainl~.
The in~rltion will no~. be explaineci in rnore detail with
reference tc the accompar\ying d~w;ngs, in which:
fig 1 sr;J~S on~ r-mbodin~ent ~f an optical cr~mmuni-
ca~;on system wi~h power ~imiters in accor-
d;,~ce wi~:h the invent;on,
Fig~ ~ lr:Oh'S th.~ attenuation of a power limiter
as a f~n~;tion of the optical power input
to the l,m;ter, c~nc-i
Fig. 3 slow~ a riber-optic amplifier ~ith a oower
lim;ter for ar, optical communication sys-
t e m .
Fig. 1 sho~s an optical colnmunication system with an elec-
trical-to-optical. ~ransduGer ~ at the transmitting end
and one ol:.t.ical-!:o-ei~eç.trical transducer 3 at the re-
ceiving er,l, which ar~ interconnected by an optical
~iaveguide 5. A colnmunicaiic)n system ~iith an electrical-
tO-OptiCd trans~iucer at the transmitt;ng end and two
or more ci~tribuied optir:al-to-electr;cal transducers at
the receivir-g end ;s also ~ossible. This is of no con-
sequence t or' tile invention
The commuricatioa ~ystem of Fig 1 f~rther includes a
fiber-opt c amPlifier 1 and two power l;miters 4.

- s- 2~372~
In this e~bodimeilt, as scer~ in the direction of propa-
gat;on uf the oprical sigl13l, one power limiter 4 is
~ ted 1~ead ol the ~ibel-o~tic amplifier an~ one be-
hind the .~mplifiar~ and they ~re implemented as sec-
tions of (1 ped optic~l wa~egu;de. The two power (imiters
are joine(~ to the fiber-~p~;c ampl;fier 1 and the optical
wav~guide i ~-sin~ conventional splicin~ tethn;ques.
The power limitels ma~ also be imple~ented differentLy,
e.g., as ~idtPle.s of abcjc,rb;ng mater;al which are in-
serted i" the signal path at breaks
in the Opticdl h'3Ve~Uide, e.g., in front of and behind
the opt;c-" amplif;er, respectivelyA
Th;s abs"rbing matericll has p~operties wl1ich are de-
srribed bll~w
It is a~s~ po~3ible to place one power limiter behind
the electricaL-t~-opt-ical transducer ~ and one in front
of the op;ical-to-electr;cal transducer 3. This pro-
tects thes~ system components from the effects of
giant pul~es.
In pr3cti(al use, ~ibPr-,~pt;c amplifiers are also
arransed n cascide. ]n that case, each of the links
between the ;ndi~inual ~iber-optic amplifiers may con-
tain one ~!ower limiter.
The power limiter has the following properties.
The po~er ~imit~r passes the optica~ signal with a normal
' : .'

~ 6 ~ 372~
optical ~ wl~r (a few !O nw~ and a wavelength of, e.g.,
~ 15SO rm nearly unattenlJated. ~y contrast, it
stron~ly atter\ucl'-e~; opti~al powers which correspond to
that cf ti ~? gi3nt pulse ~watt ranye).
This is illustrated in ~i~. 2. The power ratio
T = PtL~
Po
is plo~te(, dS d fur;ction of the optical power input P~
to the ~ow~ iter. P(~) is the optical power output
of a powe~ limiter of length L.
The depen{ierlce of the attenuation in the power li~iter
is prefcrally nolline3r~ as shown in F;g. 2, so that
high-power opt;cal ra~-Jiation w;ll be attenuated d;s-
proportionately.
This ~tt~n~atior\ in the power lim;ter can be providedby ~;ght (attering. and/or absorption. The power li~;ter
is preferai~ly ma~e of an absorbing material in which
the absor~;tion i~ a two-~hoton process. The latter
exhibits ;he part;cularly suitable nonlinear dependence
of the op'ical input power. Th;s absorption is de-
scribed, 10r exa~ple, in a book by r~R. Shen, "The
Principle: ~f Nonlinear optics", John Wiley ~ Sons,
pp. 202-2 ~), but nct in connection with a particular
matarial r(ld not in connection ~;th optical waveguides.
The aforelknt;o~ rec~uiremc?ntS are fulfiLled, for
examp~e, '~ a s~ction of doped optical waveguide made

~3~2~
of an abio!~,irlg n~aterial with two-photon absorpti~n.
Such an diJsort~ g mat~rial is neodymium~ Nd, or
thu~i~;m, ''m, fo~ e~ample.
i~y an app!ot~riate cholce of the dop~nt and the doping
concentra!;on in an optical waveguide, two-photon ab-
sorl~tion is caused. The attenuation of the power
limi~er i~, determ;ned by the length of the section of doped
optical wavregui~.
~he fiber-o~tic amplifier ~iven as an example in ~i~. 3
tomprise. Lae fo'lo~ g elements, whose operation is
~nown from the alove-cited literature:
-- A st?ct i~ n of daped optical waveguide 33, wh;ch i5
doped wit~, e g , erbium i~ns and is capable of
~ccumulating CXCitatiQn energy suppl;ed by a pump
source. 'le settion nf optical waveguide has two
ends 35, 36.
- A pump ource 50~ which emits pump light.
- P~mp~lignt-couplilg means~ These means consist of
a pump~ ht-:,oupling fiber 31 and a coupler 32.
Their fun(tion i~ to teed the putnp light into the
section of t~opeti optical waveguide 33~
- A power limiter 4, shown here in the form of a
section of ~ptiral wa~ey:Jide, contains a core with
a semicorl-'uctiny absorbing material which is distri-
buted ;n the core in the torm of microcrYstal-
lites. Thij material is chosen to ha~e an absorption
coefficien~ wh;ch increa!ieci ~ith increasing optical
input pow~r, The absorption is a two-photon ~rocess.

-~- 20~372~
Preferabt~, the ab~or~irl~ material is a semiconduotor
of the t~e ~ I, parttcularly cadmium telluride, CdTe.
The power li~iter is preferably connected in series
with the ~ection of doped optical waveguide 33 by a
splice ~4.
If the doping a~en~ is ionized erbium, Er , the ab-
sorbing semieon~luc~or material will have a band glp
correspundin~ to a wavelength between 750 nm and 1550 nm.
Gl~sses d(,ped with se~i~onductor m;crocrystallites were
examined wi~h regard to ehe;r twû photon absorpt;on:
coefricients ~f 0.2 cm/GW were measured by F. Canto,
E. M;esah et a~ (CLEO'88, Poster WM41) for the case
where thY absor~t;on in the longitudinal direction is
negl;gible (the energy of the photon is less than th~
band ga~). These results can be applied to optical wave-
guides.
If, with such a coeff;c-ient (0.2 cm/GW), ;t ;s to be
ensured that a ~,ower of 5W (10 MW/c~ ) is not exceeded
in an opt ical communication system, and the loss to be
;nduced is 30 dtl, a power lim;ter implemented as an op-
tical h~a~eguide ~Ust have a length of 30 m. The corres-
ponding loss dt a power of 50 mW ;s then 0.3 dB.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2013-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2000-04-10
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2000-04-10
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1999-04-08
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-10-14

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1999-04-08

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1998-03-24

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1998-04-08 1998-03-24
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALCATEL SEL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Past Owners on Record
JOSE CHESNOY
THOMAS PFEIFFER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1993-10-13 1 12
Claims 1993-10-13 2 33
Drawings 1993-10-13 1 7
Descriptions 1993-10-13 8 174
Representative drawing 1998-11-02 1 2
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1999-05-05 1 186
Reminder - Request for Examination 1999-12-08 1 117
Fees 1997-03-23 1 64
Fees 1995-02-16 1 57
Fees 1996-03-17 1 46
Courtesy - Office Letter 1993-07-12 1 24