Language selection

Search

Patent 2094395 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2094395
(54) English Title: SURFACE FINISH COMPOSITIONS
(54) French Title: COMPOSITIONS DE FINIS DE SURFACE
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09D 127/12 (2006.01)
  • C08K 3/30 (2006.01)
  • C10M 111/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HUGGINS, GARY E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • HUGGINS, GARY E. (Not Available)
  • EEONYX CORPORATION (United States of America)
  • PREEMPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SIM & MCBURNEY
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-08-21
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-02-27
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1992/007061
(87) International Publication Number: WO1993/003921
(85) National Entry: 1993-04-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
750,894 United States of America 1991-08-26

Abstracts

English Abstract

2094395 9303921 PCTABS00020
Thin impermeable, surface hardened, corrosion-resistant, durable,
dry lubricant surface finishes are provided as well as surface
finished products and methods for the production thereof. The
surface finishes comprise particulate mixtures of sulfur containing
metallic compounds and fluorocarbon polymers and are applied to
surfaces of substrates such as metallic surfaces.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 93/03921 PCT/US92/07061

-18-

We Claim:

1. A surface finish composition for application to a
substrate by peening to provide an impermeable, surface
hardened, corrosion-resistant, durable, dry lubricant
finished product comprising a particulate mixture of a
sulfur containing metallic compound and a fluorocarbon
polymer.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said
particulate mixture chemically bonds with said substrate.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said sulfur
containing metallic compound is molybdenum disulfide.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said sulfur
containing metallic compound is selected from the group
consisting of sulfides of tungsten, lead, tin, copper,
calcium, titanium, zinc, chromium, iron, antimony,
bismuth, silver, cadmium and alloys and mixtures thereof.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein said
fluorocarbon polymer is tetrafluoroethylene.
6. The composition of claim 5 wherein said
tetrafluoroethylene has a molecular weight of about
800-2000.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said
fluorocarbon polymer is a mixture of different molecular
weight tetrafluoroethylenes including a
tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight of about
1100 and a tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight
of about 1300.

WO 93/03921 PCT/US92/07061

-19-

8. The composition of claim 1 wherein said
fluorocarbon polymer is selected from the group consisting
of hexafluoropropylene, perfluoroalkoxyvinyl ether,
copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene,
copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluoroalkoxyvinyl
ether, ethylenetetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylidene
fluoride, ethyl-chlorotrifluoroethylene, copolymers of
ethylene and tetrafluoroethylene and mixtures thereof.
9. A surface finish composition for application to a
metal substrate by peening to provide an impermeable,
surface hardened, corrosion-resistant, durable, dry
lubricant finished product comprising a particulate
mixture of molybdenum disulfide and a fluorocarbon polymer.
10. The composition of claim 9 wherein said
fluorocarbon polymer is tetrafluoroethylene.
11. The composition of claim 10 wherein said
particulate mixture is chemically bonded with said surface
of said metal substrate.
12. The composition of claim 10 wherein said
tetrafluoroethylene has a molecular weight of about
800-2000.
13. The composition of claim 11 wherein said
fluorocarbon polymer is a mixture of different molecular
weight tetrafluoroethylenes including a
tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight of about
1100 and a tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight
of about 1300.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 93/~3921 PCI/U592/1~7061
2~43~5
--1--
i
!

DEBCRIPTION

81JRFACE FINIB~I COMP08ITION~3


TECHNI CAL FI ELD
This invention relates to surface finishes which
impart nonabradable and nonetchable, durable dry
lubricity, corrosion resistance and improved wet film
~ntrapment characteristics to a substrate and to methods
15 for applying such surface finishes to a substrate.
Although this invention is primarily directed to ~he
surface finishing of metallic substrates, it should be
noted that it is likewise applicable to surface finishes
for application to other suitable substrate materials such
as ceramic compositions. Furthermore, it should be noted
that the metallic substrates employed herein may range
from very hard metals having a hardness factor measured on
the Rockwell C scale of greater than 40 to so~t metals
having hardness values measured on the Rockwell B scale.
Accordingly, a diversity of substrate materials may be
utilized in this invention provided that the material has
sufficient structural integrity to withstand the high
pressure impact application techniques employed herein.
A wide variety of corrosion-resistant coatings as well
as methods for the application of such coatings to
substrates have been disclosed heretofore. Examples
thereof may be found in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,574,658;
3,754,976; 4,228,670; 4,312,900; 4,333,840; 4,415,419;
4,552,784; 4,553,417 and 4,753,094.

W O 93/0392] PC~r/US92/07061

2~9439S 2 : ~

In this regard, several of the a}~ove-noted patents
disclose processes for applying coatings to the surface of
work pieces by a peening or blasting procedure in which
the coating material is applied to the surface by pellets
or other shot material and is impacted at high pressure
against the surface of the work piece in order to apply
the coating on the pellets or shot to the surface of the
work piece. For example, in U.S. Patent No. 3,574,658, a
method is disclosed for applying a dry lubricant in the
nature of a molybdenum or tungsten disulfide coating to
the shot material and then applying this dry lubricant
material to the surface of the work piece as a coating.
U.s. Patent No. 3,754,976 discloses a co~ting process
wherein shot and powdered metal are peened against the
surface oî a work piece which has previously been cleaned
with a gentle stream of peening particles in the absence
of the coating material. U.S. Patent No. 4,228,670
discloses a process wherein steel or glass shot is
co-mingled with lubricant and blasted against a work piece
in order to apply the lubricant to the work piece
surface. U.S. Patent No. 4,312,900 discloses a process
wherein the work pi~ce surface is initially pitted by shot
blasting using abrasive materials such as glass or sand
followed by buffing dry molybdenum disulfide into the pits
created in the surface of the work piece by the shot
blasting. U.S. Patent No. 4,552,784 discloses a further
process for applying a metal powder to the surface of a
work piece by a peening technique. Again, in U.S. Patent
No. 4,753,094, a process is taught wherein a thin film
coating of molybdenum disulfide is applied to a substrate
surface by a peening action in order to adhere the
molybdenum disulfide to the surface of the substrate as a
coating thereon.




':

wo93/o3s2l PCT/US92/0706~
2~9;43!~
--3--

However, none of the prior disclosures have provided
products demonstrating the combination of characteristics
and properties which are achieved by the products of the
present invention nor do they provide processes for
producing such products. Indeed, the need to prolong the
wear-life of substrate surfaces such as metal surfaces and
to reduce the frictional properties thereof in order to
reduce repair and replacement costs has been and continues
to be the focus of intensive research and development
efforts. Nonetheless, these efforts have achieved only
relatively limited success resulting from the use of
previously known coatings, paints and lubricants (both wet
and dry). Each of the known techniques for treating
substrates such as metal surfaces has presented
significant problems and drawbacks in regard to the cost,
difficulties in application, product properties achieved
and the like.
Particularly, it is presently believed that the
processes of the present invention achieve surface
modification whereby plural polymers are bonded with the
surface of the treated work piece or substrate. For
purposes hereof, the term bond or bonded will apply to
either physical or chemical bonds which result in products
demonstrating the desired characteristics. Based on this
belief, it is presently hypothesized that the surface
finishes of this invention are not coatings but are
permanently bonded with the substrate and can only be
removed by grinding away the substrate surface itself.
~ccordingly, the surface-finishing processes of the
present invention result in products with permanent
finishes having a degree of long lasting, durable dry
lubricity and corrosion resistance which has not been
achieved heretofore.




:,.


.
. .: . . . : . .

W~93/03921 PCT/U~92/070~

209 ~39~ _4_

With regard to prior processes ~or impar~ing desirable
physical properties of polymers to substrate surfaces such
as metal surfaces, it has been common to employ
fluorocarbon polymers such as tetrafluoroethylene (TFE)
sold, for example, under the tradename "Teflon" by E.I. Du
Pont de Nemours & Co. (Inc.), as a coating material.
Teflon coated surfaces are known to reduce friction and
adhesion but must be applied to the substrate by use of
primers such as epoxy. The coated surface, accordingly,
abrades under modest pressure, does not coat evenly or
thinly and requires high temperatures for application.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overcomes many of the known
shortcominqs of the prior art. The invention comprises
preparing a particulate mixture of a sulfur containing
metallic compound such as molybdenum disulfide or tungsten
disulfide and a fluorocarbon polymer such as
tetrafluoroethylene, preferably in a ratio of about l:l to
about lO:l parts fluorocarbon polymer to sulfur containing
metallic compound (on a weight percentage basis).
A pressurized stream of the particulate mixture is
impacted onto the surface of a substrate at a sufficient
pressure and for a sufficient period of time to cause
surface modification whereby the particulate mixture
interacts with the substrate. As a result of the
application of such surface finishes to the surface of the
substrate, it has been found that the resulting product
demonstrates outstanding corrosion resistance as well as
long lasting, durable dry lubricity characteristics.
Furthermore, the surface finishes have been found to
provide a relatively thin, impermeable, surface hardened
exterior on the surface of the substrate or work piece.




' ' .- ' '' ' '..'".,: ,... ~ ;~,::

.. : . ,~ , . :,,
' ' ,''," " ' ' "" ::

': ' ; ' . :' "'' ' ' : :

WO 93/03921 PCI'/VS92/07061

5- ~9~395

These surface finishes have been found ~Q be sufficiently
thin so that the finishes do not interfere with critical
tolerances of any processed parts or components.
Accordingly, it is a general object of the present
invention to provide new and improved surface finishes for
application to substrates and to provide methods of
applying such surface finishes to substrates.
Another object is to provide corrosion-resistant
surface finishes demonstrating long lasting, durable dry
lubricity characteristics as well as providin~ an
impermeable, surface hardened outer surface on a substrate.
A further object is to provide methods for producing
corrosion-resistant, long lasting, durable dry lubricant
surface finishes on substrates.
A further object is to provide a surface finished
product having a high degree of permanent dry lubricity.
Another object is to provide a metal sur~ace
exhibiting long lasting, durable dry lubricity and hi~h
resistance to temperature extremes.
A still further object is to provide methods for
producing thin surface finishes which exhibit long
lasting, durable dry lubricity; corrosion and heat
resistance as well as improved thin film entrapment (or
retention) properties.
Yet another object is to provide methods for
relatively easy and inexpensive application of the surface
finishes of this invention to substrate surfaces.
Other objects of this invention, in addition to those
set ~orth above, will become apparent to one of ordinary
skill in the art from the following description.




- : .: . . : ,. :. . .

W093/03921 PCT/US92/07061

209~395 -6-

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Fig. l is a schematic flow diagram illustrating the
method of the present invention employed to apply a dry
lubricating, corrosion-resistant finish to the surface of
a substrate.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The drawing is a schematic flow diagram showing an
embodiment of the methods of the present invention for
applying surface finishes to a substrate.
In the embodiment of this invention depicted in Fig.
l, a multistep process is illustrated wherein a substrate
surface is first subjected to an optional solvent
precleaning step in order to remove any loose surface
contamination such as hydrocarbons and other physical and
chemical debris from the substrate prior to further
processing. This precleaning step is employed in order to
reduce contamination which may be encountered and which
may thereby interfere with the blast application of the
surface finish onto the substrate.
The appropriate solvent to be used for this
precleaning is somewhat ubstrate specific. For example,
very dirty, greasy substrates wilI require a Stoddard
solvent to be employed to clean the substrate surface.
For substrate surfaces which are non-degassing, such as
chrome/molybdenum or stainless steel, l,l,l
trichloroethane or equivalent solvent may be employed in
an ultrasonic cleaning procedure. For degassing
substrates, a Branson IS solvent is employed in an
ultrasonic cleaning procedure.
In a specific solvent precleaning process employed in
the laboratory, a metallic substrate was brush scrubbed in
Stoddard solvent with Hurri-Safe Special Formula Degreaser




: . '..; '. ' ::
''' ; . . ,:. ! ' ' '
' "' ':' . "' ' , ''.. ':: ' '' "

,, , "'' ', , ' ~" ':, ' :

W093/03921 P~T/US92/07061

-7- 2~9 ~3 g~

at a 1:4 dilution in a Hurri-Kleen cold part washing
machine and the substrate was then air dried. Thereafter,
the material was cleaned in either Branson IS Formulated
Cleaning Solution, l:lo dilution or 1,1,1 trich1Droethane
precleaner (sold by Brownells) utilizing an indlrect
method in a Branson 8200 Ultrasonic Cleaner filled with
Branson IS Formulated Cleaning Solution, 1:10 dilution.
Cleaning time was about 15 minutes at 40 C.
As illustrated in ~he drawing, after comple~ion of the
solvent precleaning step, the substrate is then subjected
to an abrasive cleaning/sur~ace disruption step ~o create
a sufficient and appropriate amount of disrupted surface
area on the surface of the substrate in order to interact
with the sur~ace finish material to be applied
thereafter. In this abrasive cleaning step, any oxidation
or contamination from the substrate material which was not
removed in the precleaning step i5 removed.
This abrasive cleaning/surface disruption step may be
performed in a blast cabinet environment in accordance
with the procedures disclosed for precleaning in U.S.
Patent No. 4,753,094 (the disclosure of which is
incorporated herein by reference). The specific
parameters of treatment within this step of the process
are subject to choice, depending on the substrate material
and its intended end use. For example, the delivery
pressure/velocity, temperature, angle of delivery,
duration of blasting and like parameters o~ the process
are subject to choice and will vary depending on whether
final treatment of the substrate is intended to increase
dry lubricity, wear resistance, quick release ~i.e.,
non-sticking effect), operakive temperature range and/or
corrosion resistance.




.: : .-., . - ". . . ... ,,.. , -.
.. . . , . : , . .
. . . . , .:
, ~ : : ;. ,, . . . . . . .

W093/0392] PCT/US92/070~1 1

2~9 439~ -8-

In regard to the blast materials to be used for this
abrasive cleaning/surface disruption step, it has been
found that for softer, nonferrous metals and alloys,
(e.g., aluminum, copper, ~ead, magnesium, zinc, beryllium,
gold, tin, bronze, brass, etc.); glass beads, nylon or
plastic particles or aluminum shot may be employed for
blast cleaning the surface of the substrate. For harder,
nonferrous metals (e.g., nickel) and for ferrous metals
and alloys, (e.g., iron, molybdenum, chromium, tungsten,
vanadium, steels and stainless steel) aluminum oxide
particles, silicon carbide particles, glass beads, sand
particles, steel shot and the like may be used to provide
the peening action in cleansing the surface of the
substrate. In this regard, it has bean found that less
aggressive media (e.g., glass beads) may be used for
applications where a characteristic such as quic~ release
or non-sticking is desired, while more aggressive media
such as aluminum oxide or silicon carbide are preferred
for use in applications where end product characteristics
such as increased wear resistance or dry lubricity are
desired.
In regard to the delivery pressures to be employed for
performing this abrasive cleaning step, it is believed
that pressures up to 250 psi may be employed for hard and
very hard substrates such as chrome/molybdenum steels and
tungsten carbides, whereas lower delivery pressures of as
low as about 20 psi may be used in other applications. As
employed herein, the term "delivery pressure" is defined
as the blast pressure applied to a substrate at a distance
of two inches from the nozzle of the delivery device.
The temperature range to be employed in performing
this abrasive cleaning step appears to be a matter of
selection and not to be determinative of the quality of




.. . ~ . . . .................. .
.:: .

: ' . , ' " '. : . .:

W O 93/03921 ~c~r/US92/07~61

2~3439~
the surface treatment achieved. However, it has been
found that temperatures ranging between ambient
temperatures and about 50~ C are suitable for this
cleaning step.
In specific abrasive cleaning/surface disruption
processes employed in the laboratory, substrates which
were to be cleaned/disrupted with aluminum oxide (extra
fine grade-Brownells) utilized a Techni Blast Model 36
Cleaning Machine, sold under the trademark "SURFGARD" at
58 cubic feet per minute at 100 pounds pressure. This
cleaning machine was equipped with a 3/16 inch blast gun
with a ceramic nozzle. Alternatively, substrates which
were to be cleaned/disrupted with glass beads (#270 U.SO
Sieve Size-Brownells) were blasted utilizing a Trinco
Direct Pressure Cabinet Nodel 36X30tPC equipped with a 1/4
inch nozzle I.D. and the substrate was blasted at 60-120
psi tpreferably ahout 80-100 psi) at a distance of between
about 2 inches and 12 inches (preferably about 6-8 inches)
at an angle of about 20 - ~0 (preferably about 30 -
60) until a uniformly disrupted surface was obtained and
all surface contamination was removed.
In step three illustrated in the drawing, the
substrate is air cleaned with dry, compressed air to
remove any residual cleaning/disrupting media thereby
avoiding any possible cross-contamination with different
media.
once the preliminary cleaning steps one, two and three
are completed, the substrate is then in condition to be
processed in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a
pressurized stream of a particulate mixture of a sulfur
containing metallic compound and a fluorocarbon pol~mer is
directed in a pressurized stream to impact against the




:. : ,.. . .
, " :... ,.'' ' . '~. :
~, ~., '' ~ ,

WO 93/03921 PCT/US92/0706~
~a~39~
--10--

surface of a substrate at a sufficient pressure and for a
suf~icient~ period of time to cause the particulate mixture
to interact with the substrate and to provide a
surprisingly thin, impermeable, surface hardened,
corrosion-resistant, durable, dry lubricant finish on the
surface of the substrate.
In practice, the substrate surface to be treated is
preferably a metallic surface. However, as previously
noted herein, the substrate may be any suitable ferrous or
lo nonferrous metal or alloy of a metal or a ceramic
composition.
In order to expedite the impacting or peening of the
particulate matter against the surface of the substrate,
it has been found that suitable peening media having
suitable shot sizes should be employed for purposes of
conveying the mixture to the previously disrupted surface
of the substrate. Another purpose of the peening media in
addition to providing a carrier for the surface finish
particula~e material is to surface harden the subs~rate
through the peening process. A suitable peening medium
for purposes of use in the present process is chosen as a
function of its compatibility with the substrate and its
affinity for the particulate surface finish material which
it is carrying.
In addition, the siæe and hardness of thP peening
media have been found to influence the effective transfer
of the surface finish material to the cleansed, disrupted
substrate surface. In this regard, we have found that
shot sizes ranging from SAE Size No. S70 to about S780
(preferably about Size No. S70 and S230; most preferably
about Size S170) may suitably be employed in the processes
of this invention. In particular, we have found that with
softer metal substrates (such as those on the Rockwell B




. : , :, ,, :. . :.
:.: : .. .. - :
. :: . .. :. : ,
- ... ., .. : -
:. . .
: ~ . .: . . ,

,: .: . ; . ~ . :

W093/03921 PCT/US92/07061
~ .. ; .
99~3~
scale or on the Rockwell C scale ratings of 40 and below),
use of larger size shot (such as about SAE Size No. 170
and above) is preferred in order to achieve maximum
surface finish coverage~ Also, we have found that with
harder metals (Rockwell C scale ratings of 40 and above),
such large shot (i.e., SAE No. S170 and above) is likewise
preferred for purposes of achieving continuous surface
coverage. However, it is to be noted that smaller size
shot may also be employed in certain applications to avoid
~o surface asperities.
Examples of suitable peening media which may be used
herein are steel shot, stainless steel shot, aluminum
shot, plastic shot and the like having sufficient
structural integrity to withstand impact on the substrate
surface.
In general, the surface finish composition of this
invention is a particulate mixture of solid lubricants
formulated to provide dry lubrication and/or corrosion
resistance and/or non-stick properties desired for
purposes of the end use of the product. Suitable solid
lubricants for use in the particulate mixtures of the
present invention include fluorocarbon polymers and
carrier or binder polymers.
Exemplary of suitable fluorocarbon polymers are
homogenates or mixtures of finely-divided fluorocarbon
resins having fully fluorinated carbon backbones such as
tetrafluoroethylene homopolymer (TFE), hexafluoropropylene
(HFP), perfluoroalkoxyvinyl ether (PPVE), copolymers of
TFE and HFP, copolymers of TFE and PPVE. Other suitable
fluorocarbon polymers are fluoropolymer resins which are
not fully fluorinated such as ethylenetetrafluoroethylene
(ETFE), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF~, ethylene-
chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), copolymers of ethylene




.
, : , :
.: ~ , , , . . : .. .
. ,: ... . . : :
-: : . . . .

: : . .; ,

W093/03921 PCT/V~92/07~6~
209ll3~
-12-

and TFE such as products sold under the trademark "Tefzel"
by E.I. Du Pont de Nemours ~ Co. (Inc.). The molecular
weight of the fluorocarbon polymers to be u~ed herein may
vary over a relatively wide range although molecular
weights of from abou~ 800 to about 2000 are preferred and,
particularly about 1000-1800. Furthermore, it should be
noted that mixtures of fluorocarbon polymers of varying
molecular weights may be advantageously employed herein
as, for example, mixtures of tetrafluoroethylenes having
molecular weights of 1100 and 1300.
In summary, the fluorocarbon polymers are chosen ~or
their ability to impart their individual characteristics
to the substrate and for their affinity to the substrate,
the peening media employed, and/or the other solid
lubricant material chosen. Furthermore, suitable
fluorocarbon polymers for use herein are impermeable and
chemically unreactive to water and other solids, W
radiation and gases. The polymers are highly thermally
stable and will withstand high upper surface temperatures
(i.e., about 204 C - 260 C) as a result of their high
C-F and C-C bond strengths and the resulting non-polar
nature of the linear polymer. These resins have a low
coefficient of friction and a low dielectric constant and
dissipation factor. They exhibit a high degree of linear
flexibility and are flame resistant.
The other solid lubricant component of the particulate
mixture employed herein is a sulfur containing metallic
compound which acts as a carrier or binder molecule
herein. Suitable metal sulfides for purposes of the
present invention possess anti-friction/dry lubrication
capabilities, can withstand increased operating
temperatures and/or demonstrate high affinity towards
metals such as those employed as the substrates herein or




., : .: . , :
.. ,.:
. ., . I

W093/03921 PCT/US92/07Q6D

-13- 2~9~9~

the peening media utilized herein as well as demonstrating
high affinity toward the fluorocarbon polymers selected as
part of the surface treatment mixture.
Representative of suitable sulfur containing metallic
compounds for use herein are sulfides of molybdenum,
tungsten, lead, tin, copper, calcium, titanium, zinc,
chromium, iron, antimony, bismuth, silver, cadmium and `
alloys and mixkures thereof.
In a preferred form, molybdenum disulfide is employed
as the sulfur containin~ metal compound in the particulate
mixtures employed. Molybdenum disulfide has a high
affinity to steel and other base metals and has the
ability to increase surface hardness, corrosion
resistance, elevated temperature strength and dry
lubricity. It also has a high affinity to fluorocarbon
micropowders which may be employed advantageously herein.
Thus, it has been found that use o* molybdenum disulfide
herein provides the dual function of a dry lubricant
additive as well as a carrier/binder molecule for the
fluorocarbon polymer to promote coating of the peening
media.
In general, the amount of fluorocarbon polymer to be
incorporated in the particulate mixture to provide the
requisite surface finish is determined by the amount of
such polymer required to saturate the carrier or binder
molecule such as molybdenum disulfide. The total amount
of the particulate mixture to be employed for applying the
surface finish to the substrate via a peening action in a
blast cabinet is determined by the amount of material
required to keep the peening medium completely coatPd
during the blasting operation in the cabinet.
In a laboratory example of the practice of the present
invention, a Techni Blast Model 36 SURFG~RD Peen Plating




- . . :, ,, , ~. ;
- .. . .. .


' ,,, ~ :, .. ..

WO93/03921 PCT/U~92/070~1

209 43~5 -14-

Machine, 70 cubic feet per minute at lO0 pounds pressure,
3/16 inch Suction Blast Gun with Ceramic Nozzle was
employed for directing the particulate mixture against the
surface of a substrate in a blast cabinet. The cabinet
was loaded with 500 ml. (by volume) molybdenum disulfide
(Super Fine Grada, Lot #510DS, Climax Molybdenum Co.); 500
ml. (by volume) tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular
wei~ht of about llO0 (Teflon Fluoroadditive Type MPllO0,
Lot #BMAB40D002, Du Pont); 500 ml~ (by volume)
tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight of about
1300 (Teflon Fluoroadditive Type MP1300, Lot #68-86,
Du Pont) and 200 pounds of S70 steel shot (Techni Blast~.
The blast cabinet temperature was maintained at a~out
50 C and the delivery pressure at the nozzle of the peen
plating machine was 80 psi. The particulate mixture with
the peening medium was blasted at a 45 angle at a
distance of about 6-8 inches until a uniform, void-free
surface treatment had been achieved.
After completion of step four in the drawing wherein
the finish surface is applied to the substrate in
accordance with the method of the present invention, it
has been found that the resulting product may
advantageously be subjected to a post-treatment cleaning
and preservation step (step ~ive in the drawing). In this
step of the process, the substrates having the inventive
surface finish applied therein are cleaned with dry,
compressed air to remove any residual surface treatment
particles. Thereafter, the substrate is washed with a
cleaning solution and preserved with an oil that is
compatible with the end use of the material, if so desired.
In a preferred embodiment of the preæent invention, a
surface finish is produced in the surface of a two inch by
two inch square, l/4 inch thick chrome/molybdenum steel




~; , ,

W O 93/03921 PC~r/US92/07061
, ~ . ;.
-15- 2~94393

sample. The hardness of the chrome/molybdenum steel
sample was 53 as measured on the Rockwell C scale. In the
process, after subjecting the steel sample to appropriate
solvent precleaning, the sample was subjected to an
abrasive cleaning/surface disruption step in a cabinet
wherein aluminum oxide shot was impacted onto the steel
surface at 60 psi at an angle of about 45 under ambient
temperature conditions.
Thereafter, the sample was introduced into a blast
cabinet and a Techni Blast Model 36 SURFGARD Peen Plating
Machine having a 3/16 inch Suction Blast Gun with ceramic
Nozzle was employed to direct a particulate mixture
against the surface of this sample. The particulate
mixture was prepared by mixing 22 ouncas (by weight)
tetrafluoroethylene having a molecular weight of about
1500 ~Teflon Fluoroadditive Type MP1500J, Lot ~999999) in
a container with 100 lbs. of SAE No. S170 steel shot.
Then, an additional 14.5 ounces (by weight) of
tetrafluoroethylene (MP1500J) was admixed with the steel
shot in the same container. In a separate container, 30
ounces (by weight) of molybdenum disulfide ~Super Fine
Grade, Lot #510DS, Climax Molybdenum Co.) was mixed with
100 lbs. of SAE No. S170 steel shot.
The contents of the two containers were then mixed
together and an additional 24.3 ounces (by weight) of
tetrafluoroethylene (MP1500J) was added to the mixture.
The combined mixture contained 60.8 ounces (by weight)
tetrafluoroethylene, approximately 30 ounces (by weight)
molybdenum disulfide and about 200 lbs. SAE No. S170 steel
shot. The resulting combined mixture contained a ratio by
weight of tetrafluoroethylene to molybdanum disulfide of
about 2:1.




..: . .

,
.. . .
.,: : , :.: :
. . ~ . ~ ~: . : . . .: .

WO 93/03921 Pcl/u~ t,-j,

2~9 433~ -16-

The blast cabinet temperature was maintained at about
500 C and the delivery pressure at the nozzle of the peen
plating machine was 80 psi. The steel shot peening medium
having the particulate mixture intimately coatsd on the
suxface of the shot was blasted onto the precleaned,
disrupted surface of the sample at an angle of about 4~
at a distance of about 4 inches for a period of about 15
seeonds to form a uniform, void-free surface on the
surface of the chrome/molybdenum steel sample.
Subsequent to the bla~t treatment, the sample was
subjected to a post-treatment cleaning step by subjecting
the sample to Stoddard solvent in a Hurri-Kleen Station.
This cleaning step was followed by subsequent cleaning of
the resulting product in 1,1,1 - trichloroethylene in a
15 lO00 ml. beaker and the resulting cleaned surface finish
product was subjected to air drying before evaluation~
The resulting product was found to have a
nonabradable, nonetchable surface which was durable,,
corrosion resistant and demonstrated dry lubricity and
20 exceptional wet film entrapment characteristics~
Thus, a method has been described herein for producing
a surface finish on a substrate in a manner such that the
resulting product exhibits a wide range of benefits
otherwise unavailable. The surface finished product
25 demonstrates permanent dry lubricity and is highly
resistant to temperature extremes. Furthermore, the r
surface finished product provides a natural barrier to
normal oxidation and corrosion since it is chemically
inert. In addition, the finish in the treated substrate
30 surface exhibits exceptional durability and is extremely
thin, being measured as low as about 0.5 micron thickness
as opposed to prior art coatings wherein the coat is
measured in mils such as the industry standard electroless




.

- :, .... . : . - . : .
: , . : , . , ' ~ . .

~093/03921 PCT/U~g2/~

17 2~9~39~

nickel coatings which have a thickness of 3/8 mil when
submerged in nickel plating solution for 45 minutes at
90.50 C. Still further, the surface finishes of the
present invention are applied relatively easily even at
relatively low temperatures and inexpensively in order to
provide the desired surface modification herein.
The products produced in accordance with this
invention have a multiplicity of uses in a variety of
industries and in products containing metal on metal
friction points or which are subject to metal surface
corrosion. Exemplary of the scope of the utilization of
the present invention are applications within the
automotive industry, fuel handling systems, power tools
and e~uipmen~, fasteners, ball bearings, rollers and other
anti-friction components, consumer products including
cookware, houseware and razor blades, turbines! gears and
other intermeshing machinery as well as a variety of other
potential uses.
Although the invention has been described in its
preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it
is to be understood that the present disclosure has been
made by way of example only. Numerous changes in the
details and operational steps of the methods and in the
materials utilized therein will be apparent without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as
deined in the appended claims.




., .

.

. . .. :, . . :: :

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1992-08-21
(87) PCT Publication Date 1993-02-27
(85) National Entry 1993-04-19
Dead Application 1995-02-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-04-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-10-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HUGGINS, GARY E.
EEONYX CORPORATION
PREEMPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Prosecution Correspondence 1993-11-05 1 33
Prosecution Correspondence 1993-06-25 2 80
Office Letter 1993-09-24 1 13
PCT Correspondence 1993-05-18 1 40
International Preliminary Examination Report 1993-04-19 3 112
Representative Drawing 1998-11-06 1 6
Abstract 1993-02-27 1 52
Drawings 1993-02-27 1 17
Claims 1993-02-27 2 76
Abstract 1993-02-27 1 39
Cover Page 1993-02-27 1 20
Description 1993-02-27 17 831