Language selection

Search

Patent 2103186 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2103186
(54) English Title: DISK CLAMPING DEVICE FOR MAGNETIC DISK DRIVE
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE FIXATION DE DISQUE POUR LECTEUR DE DISQUE MAGNETIQUE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G11B 17/02 (2006.01)
  • G11B 05/012 (2006.01)
  • G11B 17/038 (2006.01)
  • G11B 23/03 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • IWABUCHI, MASANORI (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • NEC CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • NEC CORPORATION (Japan)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1999-10-05
(22) Filed Date: 1993-11-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-05-19
Examination requested: 1993-11-16
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
308392/1992 (Japan) 1992-11-18

Abstracts

English Abstract


A disk clamping device in a magnetic disk drive includes a
clamper which presses an uppermost one of a plurality of
magnetic recording disks and a clamping force transmission
member which presses the clamper against the uppermost
magnetic recording disk. A material having a small Young's
modulus, such as a high polymer material and a super elastic
material, is used for the clamper or the clamping force
transmission member, or both of them. The device may
include a shim whose Young's modulus is larger than that of
the clamper which presses the uppermost disk through the
shim. The arrangement makes it possible to reduce the
variations in the clamping force caused by a lack of
manufacturing precision or a change in temperatures and to
provide a stable clamping force. The uniform clamping
force enables to reduce the occurrence of undulation in the
disks otherwise caused by the circumferential clamping
force differences in the clamper.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A disk clamping device in a magnetic disk drive, for
positioning and fixing a plurality of magnetic recording disks
on a hub rotated by a spindle motor, adjacent disks being
separated by a spacer, said disk clamping device comprising:
a shim;
a clamper which presses an uppermost one of said
plurality of magnetic recording disks through said shim; and
a clamping force transmission member which presses
said clamper against said uppermost magnetic recording disk,
wherein at least one of said clamper and said clamping force
transmission member being constituted by a super elastic
material, and said shim being constituted by a material having
a Young's modulus larger than that of said clamper.
2. A disk clamping device for magnetic disk drive
according to claim 1, in which said at least one of said
clamper and said clamping force transmission member is a super
elastic material.
-14-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~1u~18~
1 DISK CLAMPING DEVICE FOR MAGNETIC DISK DRIVE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a magnetic disk
drive, and more particularly to a disk clamping device for
positioning and fixing a plurality of magnetic data storage
media (disks) on a hub rotated by a spindle motor, for use
in a magnetic disk drive.
(2) Description of the Related Art
In a conventional disk clamping device in a magnetic
disk drive, for positioning a plurality of disks on a hub
rotated by a spindle motor) each of the component parts of
the device makes use of an elastic or spring material such
as stainless steel, beryllium copper alloy and nickel
alloy.
The elastic materials as used in the conventional disk
clamping device generally have respective yield points and,
since there develops plastic deformation if the given
material is subjected to a stress the amount of which is
beyond its yield point, it is required that such material
be used within the range of stress (load) that does not
exceed its yield point. Also) for the magnetic head for
writing/reading data on the disk to float stably over the
disk (since otherwise the data writing/reading characteris-
_ 1

~i~~lg~
1 tics are adversely affected), it is necessary that the
distortion of the disks be suppressed to the minimum and,
for this reason, the disks must be stably clamped or fixed
to the hub with the minimum necessary clamping force. One
of the defects in the above explained elastic materials as
used in the conventional device is that, since their spring
constant is large) they are sensitive to and easily affect-
ed by a lack of processing precision or a change in temper-
atures in component parts) so that there develop variations
in the effective clamping forces.
Another factor which largely affects the distortion of
the disks is that of precision in a surface of the clamper.
The problem the conventional arrangement has encountered is
that, when the disks are fixed to the hub by the conven-
tional clamper) there has developed a wave-like distortion
or undulation in the disks due to the circumferential
clamping force differences in the clamper.
SUNN~IARY OF THE INVENTION
It is) therefore, an ob,)ect of the present invention
to overcome the problems existing in the conventional
arrangement and to provide an improved disk clamping device
for the magnetic disk drive.
It is another ob,)ect of the invention to reduce the
variations in a clamping force in the device caused by a
- 2 -

lack of manufacturing precision or a change in temperatures,
and to provide a stable clamping force.
The invention provides a disk clamping device in a
magnetic disk drive, for positioning and fixing a plurality of
magnetic recording disks on a hub rotated by a spindle motor,
adjacent disks being separated by a spacer, said disk clamping
device comprising: a shim; a clamper which presses an
uppermost one of said plurality of magnetic recording disks
through said shim; and a clamping force transmission member
which presses said clamper against said uppermost magnetic
recording disk, wherein at least one of said clamper and said
clamping force transmission member being constituted by a
super elastic material, and said shim being constituted by a
material having a Young's modulus larger than that of said
clamper.
In the device according to the invention, a material
having a small Young's modulus, such as a high polymer
- 3 -
74002-4

~1031~6
1 material and a super elastic material) is used for the
clamper or the clamping force transmission member) or both
of them.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The above and other objects) features and advantages
of the present invention will be apparent from the follow-
ing description of preferred embodiments of the invention
explained with reference to the accompanying drawings) in
which:
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic sectional view of a disk
clamping device for a magnetic disk drive of a first embod-
invent according to the invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic sectional view of a disk
clamping device for a magnetic disk drive of a second
embodiment according to the invention;
Fig. 3 is a graph showing the relationship in charac-
teristics between stress and deflection of the clamper in
comparison with that in a conventional disk clamping de-
vice, for an explanation of operational theories of the
present invention; and
Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship in charac-
teristics between stress and deflection in an example
wherein a super elastic material is used as a material of
the clamper.
- 4 -

~~ ~~18~
1 PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
Now, preferred embodiments of the invention are ex-
plained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 shows in schematic sectional view a disk clamp-
s ing device of a first embodiment according to the inven-
tion. For purposes of explaining operational theories
relating to the invention, Fig. 3 shows in a graph the
characteristic relationship between the stress and the
deflection of the clamper according to the invention in
comparison with that in the conventional device. Fig. 4
shows also in a graph the characteristic relationship
between the stress and the deflection of the clamper when a
super elastic material is used as a clamper material ac-
cording to the first embodiment of the invention.
In the first embodiment shown in Fig. 1) a hub 2 fixed
to a spindle motor 1 for rotation unitarily with the spin-
dle motor 1 carries two magnetic disks 3 and 4 with a
spacer 5 disposed therebetween. For fixing the disks 3 and
4 to the hub 2) a clamper 6 is provided on the upper disk 3
and a clamping force transmission member 7 is provided on
the clamper 6. By the clamper 6 being pressed by the
clamping force transmission member 7, the disks 3 and 4 are
firmly clamped and fixed to the hub 2.
The clamper 6 must be firmly secured to the hub 2 in
such a way that the disks 3 and 4 as well as the spacer 5
- 5 -

2m31ss
1 do not move when any external impact or vibration is sub-
,)ected to them. Also) the extent of elasticity or deflec-
tion of the clamper 6 must be large enough to absorb any
dimension errors accumulated during the assemblage of the
respective component parts.
The clamping force transmission member 7 is a member
which produces clamping force for the clamper 6 to fasten
and fix the disks 3 and 4 as well as the spacer 5 to the
hub 2. The occurrence of the variations in the clamping
forces is mainly caused by dimension errors Ohl in the
height of the portion of the hub 2 at which the disks are
mounted and by a cumulative value ~h2 of dimension errors
in the disks 3 and 4 and the spacer 5 as well as the clamp-
er 6. In the worst case, the amount of deflection of the
clamper 6 varies by (Ohl + ~h2) and the clamping power thus
fluctuates.
In the conventional disk clamping device employing a
spring material such as stainless steel, beryllium copper
alloy and nickel alloy) it is seen in a line 21 of Fig. 3
that the stress - deflection curve includes a linear por-
tion (between point 0 and yield point A) and this is the
range in which the clamper exhibits a spring elasticity and
restores to the original state when the load is released.
This range is an "elasticity region".
When the load is increased beyond the yield point A,
- 6 -

210318
1 the state of the clamper suddenly changes and the ratio of
an increase in the deflection with respect to an increase
in the stress also suddenly becomes large. If this state
continues further, the clamper breaks at point E. The
range up to this point from the yield point A is a "plas-
ticity region". When the load is removed within this
region, for example) at point B in the graph) the load
release takes place in parallel to the linear portion B - C
in the elasticity region and the permanent deformation 0 -
C remains in place.
If a sudden change takes place in the load (due to,
for example, external impact or vibration) under the state
in which the load is beyond the elasticity region, the
clamper 6 can no longer maintain the necessary clamping
force since it has already lost its spring elasticity.
In the clamper materials of the conventional device,
the Young's modulus is large with a large slanting angle of
the linear portion (0 - A). Thus, when such clamper is
used in its elasticity region in an attempt to~avoid an ill
effect to develop in the plasticity region, there is a lack
in the amount of deflection in the clamper so that the
clamping force largely fluctuates due to dimension errors
of the related component parts.
In order to solve the above problem in the convention-
al device, the clamper in this embodiment according to the
- 7 -

invention makes use of a material in which the Young's modulus
is small, for example, a high polymer material or a super
elastic material. Examples of the super elastic material are
super elastic metal alloy such as Fe-Pt (23-.25at%Pt), In-Ti
(18~23at%Ti), and Ti-Ni (49~51at%Ni), products under the
trademark "MEMOALLOY" of Tokin Co. Ltd., Japan.
Thus, as shown by the dotted line 22 in Fig. 3, the
slanting angle of the linear portion thereof can be made small
and the range of changes in the amount of deflection in a use-
permissible region 23 can be enlarged to a range from ~X1 to
~X2. In this way, it is possible to obtain and maintain
stably the necessary clamping force.
The state wherein a super elastic material is used
as a material for the clamper 6 is shown in Fig. 4. The super
elastic material has a smaller Young's modulus (with the
linear portion gently slanting) as compared with that in the
material used in the conventional arrangement so that, even
when simply the use only within the elasticity region is
considered, the range of changes in the amount of deflection
in the use-permissible region 23 is enlarged to a range from
~X1 to ~X3 which is larger than that in the conventional
arrangement shown by the line 21. Thus, the necessary
clamping force is stably obtained.
With the super elastic material, when the load is
,5
74002-4

213186
1 further increased beyond the yield point A, the region A - B
becomes linear, and in this region the deflection is con-
stant even when there is an increase in the stress. In
this state (for example) at point B) if the load is re-
moved) the clamper 6 restores to its original state along
the curve B -~ C -~ D -~ 0 so that no permanent deformation
remains.
Thus) it is by use of the region A - B that the con-
stant stress, that is) the constant clamping power) can be
stably obtained irrespective of any changes in the amount
of deflection. In this case, the range of changes in the
amount of deflection is enlarged from ~X1 to ~X4. There-
fore) any cumulative value of dimension errors in the
related component parts can be completely absorbed and the
stable clamping force can be obtained.
The material having a small Young's modulus as ex-
plained above has characteristics such that the clamper
itself can easily be deflected when the clamping force is
caused to be biased due to a lack of precision in the
surface of the clamper, so that the clamper can correct the
bias in its clamping force more effectively than in the
material having a large Young's modulus.
While the above explained embodiment relates to an
example wherein a high polymer material or a super elastic
material having a small Young's modulus is used as a mate-
- 9 -

~_ ~1~318~
1 rial of the clamper 6, the same or similar effect can be
obtained when such a high polymer material or a super
elastic material is used as a material of the clamping
force transmission member 7. The same is also true when
such a high polymer material or a super elastic material is
used as materials of both the clamper 6 and the clamping
force transmission member 7.
Fig. 2 shows in schematic sectional view a disk clamp-
ing device of a second embodiment according to the inven-
tion.
In the second embodiment shown in Fig. 2) a shim 8 is
provided between the upper disk 3 and the clamper 6 of the
device of the first embodiment shown in Fig. 1. The shim 8
is made of a material whose Young's modulus is larger than
that of the high polymer material or the super elastic
material used as the material of the clamper 6. This
enables to make the clamping force uniform to the disks 3
and 4 whereby the undulation of the disks 3 and 4 can be
made smaller. Other arrangements in this second embodiment
are the same as those of the first embodiment shown in Fig.
1.
Examples of combinations of the materials of the shim
8 and the clamper 6 are given in the following table.
- 10 -

_. z~ amss
1 . TABLE
Shim Clamper
General elastic materials
Stainless steel
Beryllium copper alloy
Fine ceramics
Low elastic materials
Aluminum alloy
High polymer material
Beryllium copper alloy
Stainless steel Aluminum alloy
High polymer material
Aluminum alloy High polymer material
The surface of the shim 8 requires high precision.
However, since the shim 8 is in a thin plate with a simple
shape, it is not difficult to produce such shim 8 having
high surface precision. When such shim 8 is provided
between the clamper 6 and the upper disk 3, the clamping
force of the clamper 6 is transmitted to the upper disk 3
through the shim 8 and, since the shim 8 and the disk 3 are
uniformly or evenly in contact with each other) the power
transmitted to the disks 3 and 4 is uniform. Thus, there
occurs no undulation in the disks 3 and 4.
The above explained second embodiment relates to an
example wherein a high polymer material or a super elastic
- 11 -

2:1 fl31~6
1 material having a small Young's modulus is used as a materi-
al of the clamper 6) the same or similar effect can be
obtained when such a high polymer material or a super
elastic material is used as a material of the clamping
force transmission member 7. The same is also true when
such a high polymer material or a super elastic material is
used as materials of both the clamper 6 and the clamping
force transmission member 7.
The advantage in the above explained. disk clamping
device according to the invention is that) by using a high
polymer material or a super elastic material having a small
Young's modulus as a material of the clamper and/or the
clamping force transmission member for fastening the disks
to the hub, it enables to reduce the variations in the
clamping force caused by a lack of manufacturing precision
or a change in temperatures and to provide a stable clamp-
ing force. Also, since the clamping force can be made
uniform on clamping) it is possible to reduce the occur-
rence of undulation in the disks caused by the circumferen-
tial clamping force differences, whereby the data
writing/reading characteristics are stabilized.
While the invention has been described in its pre-
ferred embodiments) it is to be understood that the words
which have been used are words of description rather than
limitation and that changes within the purview of the
- 12 -

1 appended claims may be made without departing from the true
scope and spirit of the invention in its broader aspects.
10
20
- 13 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-11-17
Letter Sent 2002-11-18
Grant by Issuance 1999-10-05
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-10-04
Inactive: Final fee received 1999-07-12
Pre-grant 1999-07-12
Notice of Allowance is Issued 1999-01-15
Notice of Allowance is Issued 1999-01-15
Letter Sent 1999-01-15
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1999-01-11
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1999-01-11
Inactive: IPC removed 1998-11-20
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-11-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-11-20
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 1998-11-02
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-05-19
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1993-11-16
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1993-11-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1998-10-21

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1997-11-17 1997-10-20
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1998-11-16 1998-10-21
Final fee - standard 1999-07-12
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 1999-11-16 1999-10-18
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 2000-11-16 2000-10-20
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2001-11-16 2001-10-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NEC CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
MASANORI IWABUCHI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1995-06-08 1 39
Claims 1995-06-08 2 53
Drawings 1995-06-08 2 35
Description 1995-06-08 13 457
Description 1998-11-03 13 390
Claims 1998-11-03 1 29
Representative drawing 1998-08-19 1 5
Representative drawing 1999-09-28 1 4
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 1999-01-14 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-12-15 1 173
Correspondence 1999-07-11 1 35
Fees 1996-10-16 1 42
Fees 1995-10-15 1 50
Prosecution correspondence 1998-09-22 1 43
Examiner Requisition 1998-06-22 2 50
Prosecution correspondence 1998-04-16 2 61
Examiner Requisition 1997-10-16 2 58