Language selection

Search

Patent 2105092 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2105092
(54) English Title: HIGHLY PROCESSABLE AROMATIC POLYAMIDE FIBERS, THEIR PRODUCTION AND USE
(54) French Title: FIBRES DE POLYAMIDE AROMATIQUE HAUTEMENT TRAITABLES, LEUR FABRICATION ET LEUR UTILISATION
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D06M 13/372 (2006.01)
  • D06M 13/17 (2006.01)
  • D06M 13/224 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • REBOUILLAT, SERGE (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BENNETT JONES LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2002-10-22
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-03-02
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-09-17
Examination requested: 1999-02-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1992/001891
(87) International Publication Number: US1992001891
(85) National Entry: 1993-08-27

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P4106682.0 (Germany) 1991-03-02

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to aramid fibers having a coating of an esteroil
lubricant, an emulsifying system consisting of ethoxy-
lated derivatives of unsaturated fatty acids and/or unsaturated fatty alcohols
and/or ethoxy-propoxylated alkylamines and an
antistatic agent: and to a process for making them.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


15
What is claimed is:
1. Aramid fibers having a coating of a lubricant, an emulsifying system, an
antistatic
agent, and other components, derived from a surface treatment agent which
consists of
(a) 30 to 70% by weight of an esteroil lubricant, consisting of an ester,
composed of
(I) an alcohol component which is a branched, primary or secondary,
saturated monohydric alcohol of the general formula
<IMG>
wherein
R1 represents C1-C16-alkyl,
R2 represents H, C1-C16-alkyl, if k= 1 and
R2 represents C1-C16-alkyl, if k = 0,
h = 0 to 5
j = 0 to 4
k = 0 to 1
m = 0 to 16
and wherein the total number of carbon atoms is below 25; and
(II) a carboxylic acid component which is an unsaturated fatty acid of
the general formula
R3-(COOH)s; s = 1-6
wherein
R3 represents C4-C19-alkenyl, C4-C19-alkadienyl, C4-C19-alkatrienyl,
phenyl, naphthyl, 2-phenylethenyl, or which is an unsaturated dicarboxylic
acid of the general formula
HOOC-(CH = CH)n COOH
wherein n = 1 or 2,
and said ester has a solidification point of below + 5°C, a kinematic
viscosity of 100 to 350 mm2/s (at 20°C) and an iodine value between 30

16
and 140,
(b) 20 to 50% by weight of an emulsifying system which consists of
unsaturated ethoxylated fatty acids and/or unsaturated ethoxylated fatty
alcohols
and/or ethoxylated alkylamines of the general formula
R4-X-(EO)p(PO)q-OH
wherein
R4 represents C5-C20-alkenyl, phenyl, naphthyl, or C8- or C9-alkylphenyl;
X represents -COO-, -NH- or -O-,
EO represents an ethylene oxide unit,
PO represents a propylene oxide unit,
p = 2 to 15 and
q = 0 to 10,
(c) 5 to 15% by weight of an antistatic agent, consisting of alkali salts of
C4-
C12-alkyl sulfonates, C4-C12-alkyl phosphates or C4-C20-alkyl carboxylic
acids,
and
(d) 0.2 to 2% by weight of a corrosion-inhibitor,
and whereby the amount of said coating on said fibers is 0.05 to 2.0% by
weight.
2. Fibers according to Claim 1, wherein the surface treatment went further
consists
of additives.
3. Fibers according to Claims 1 or 2, characterized in that said alcohol
component (I)
of (a) is 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-butanol, 2-pentanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, 3-
methy]-1-
butanol, 3-methyl-2-butanol, 2-methyl-1-pentanol, 4-methyl-1-pentanol, 4-
methyl-2-
pentanol, 2-pentanol, 3-heptanol, 2-octanol, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 3,5-dimethyl-1-
hexanol,
5-nonanol, 2-6-dimethyl-4-heptanol; iso-hexadecyl alcohol or iso-tridecyl
alcohol.
4. Fibers according to Claims 1 or 2, characterized in that said carboxylic
acid
component (II) of (a) is lauroleic acid, myristoleic acid, palmitoleic acid,
oleic acid,
gadoleic acid, erucic acid, ricinoleic acid, tallow acid, linoleic acid,
linolenic acid,
fumaric acid, maleic acid, cinnamic acid, naphthaline carboxylic acid, benzoic
acid,

17
terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, trimellitic acid or pyromellitic acid.
5. Fibers according to Claims 1 or 2, characterized in that said emulsifying
system
comprises octylphenol-ethoxylates (5-15 moles of EO) and/or
nonylphenolethoxylates (5-
15 moles of EO) and/or ethoxylated lauroleic-acid, myristoleic acid,
palmitoleic acid,
gadoleic acid, erucic acid, ricinoleic acid, or oleic acid (3-15 moles of EO)
and/or
ethoxylates of elaidyl alcohol, erucyl alcohol, brassidyl alcohol, or oleyl
alcohol (3-10
moles of EO) and/or tallow alcohol ethoxylate (3-10 moles of EO).
6. Fibers according to Claim 1, characterized in that said surface treatment
agent
consists of 50 to 60% by weight, of (a), 25 to 40% by weight; of (b), 5 to 10%
by weight,
of (c), and 0.3 to 1% by weight, of (d).
7. Fibers according to Claims 1 or 2, characterized in that repeating units of
the
aramid have the general formula
(-NH-A1-NH-CO-A2-CO-)n
wherein A1 and A2 are, independently from each other, selected from 1,4-
phenylene, 1,3-
phenylene; 1,2phenylene, 4,4'-biphenylene, 2,6-naphthylene, 1,5-naphthylene;
1,4-
naphthylene, phenoxyphenyl-4,4'-diyl, phenoxyphenyl-3,4'-diyl, 2,5-pyridylene
and 2,6-
quinolylene and which may or may not be substituted by one or more
substituents
comprising halogen, C1-C4-alkyl, phenyl, carboalkoxyl, C1-C4-alkoxyl, acyloxy,
nitro,
dialkylamino, thioalkyl, carboxyl and sulfonyl and in which the amide-group
may also be
replaced by a carbonylhydrazide-, azo- or azoxy-group.
8. Fibers according to Claim 7, characterized m that the aromatic polyamide is
a
copolyamide in which 80% by mole or more of the total A1 and A2 are 1,4-
phenylene and
phenoxyphenyl-3,4'-diyl which may or may not be substituted, and the content
of
phenoxyphenyl-3,4'-diylene is 10% to 40% by mole.
9. Fibers according to Claim 7, characterized in that the polyamide fibers
consist of
poly-(m-phenylene-isophthalamide).

18
10. Fibers according to Claims 7, characterized in that the polyamide fibers
consist of
poly-p-(phenylene-terephthalamide).
11. Fibers according to Claims 7, characterized in that said polyamide fibers
contain
units which are derived from 3- or 4-aminobenzoic acid.
12. A process for making aramid fibers having a coating of a surface treatment
agent,
comprising the steps of applying the surface treatment agent to said fiber in
an aqueous
system of concentration 1 to 100%, by weight, drying the fibers at a
temperature between
150 and 190°C, characterized further in that the surface treatment
agent consists of
(a) 30 to 70% by weight of an esteroil lubricant, consisting of an ester,
composed of
(I) an alcohol component which is a branched, primary or secondary,
saturated monohydric alcohol of the general formula
<IMG>
wherein
R1 represents C1-C16-alkyl,
R2 represents H, C1-C16-alkyl, if k= 1 and
R2 represents C1-C16-alkyl; if k=0,
h = 0 to 5
j = 0 to 4
k = 0 or 1
m = 0 to 16
and wherein the total number of carbon atoms is below 25, and
(II) a carboxylic acid component which is an unsaturated fatty acid of
the general formula
R3-(COOH)s; s = 1-6
wherein

19
R3 represents C4-C19-alkenyl, C4-C19-alkadienyl, C4-C19-alkatrienyl,
phenyl, naphthyl, 2-phenylethenyl, or which is an unsaturated dicarboxylic
acid of the general formula
HOOC-(CH = CH)n-COOH
wherein n = 1 or 2,
and said ester has a solidification point of below +5°C, a kinematic
viscosity of 100 to 350 mm2/s (at 20°C) and an iodine value between 30
and 140,
(b) 20 to 50% by weight of an emulsifying system which consists of
unsaturated ethoxylated fatty acids and/or unsaturated ethoxylated fatty
alcohols
and/or ethoxylated alkylamines of the general formula
R4-X-(EO)p(PO)q-OH
wherein
R4 represents C5-C20-alkenyl, phenyl, naphthyl, or C8- or C9-alkylphenyl,
X represents -COO-, -NH- or -O-,
EO represents an ethylene oxide unit,
PO represents a propylene oxide unit,
p = 2 to 15 and
q = 0 to 10,
(c) 5 to 15% by weight of an antistatic agent, consisting of alkali salts of
C4-
C12-alkyl sulfonates, C4-C12-alkyl phosphates or C4-C20-alkyl carboxylic
acids,
and
(d) 0.2 to 2% by weight of a corrosion-inhibitor.
13. Process according to Claim 12, further comprising the step of repeating
the
application of the surface treatment agent, and wherein the surface treatmet
agent further
consists of additives.
14. Process according to maims 12 or, characterized in that the concentration
of the
surface treatment agent in water is 30% by weight.

20
15. Process according to Claims 12 or 13, characterized in that the
concentration of
the surface treatment is 100%, by weight, that is, that the surface treatment
is neat.
16. Process according to Claims 12 or 13, characterized in that the surface
treatment
agent is applied to never-dried aramid fibers.
17. Process according to Claims 12 or 13, characterized in that the surface
treatment
agent is applied to previously-dried aramid fibers.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2~.05t192
1::.,;.v0 92/15747 ~ P~.'TJUS92/01~91
Back rg~o and of the Invention
Field of the Invention
s o The present invention relates to highly processable aromatic
polyamide fibers, their production and use.
Description of the Prior A,rt
Research Disclosure, .Iuly 1980, No. 195, disclosure 19520, discloses
finishes useful for tieating industrial ~bers,such as polyamide and aramid
fibers,
which finishes include a lubricant, comprising esters composed of an
aliphatic,
saturated carboxylic acid and a polyhydric or aliphatic unbranched alcohol.
These
finishes also contain an emulsifier or emulsifying system, an anti-oxidant to
increase
the stability of the composition, polysiloxanes as a further thermostable
lubricant,
2 o and a sulfonated natural oil as an antistatic agent. Furthermore, these
finishes may
contain biostats, further emulsifiers, and lubricants.
However, the finishes according to the above reference are not
suitable for the purposes of the present invention in terms of surface
frictional
properties, scourability, the protection from depositing due to abrasion,
fibrillation
2 5 and antistatic properties of the resulting treated fibers.
High strength, high modulus fibers, have been proposed to reinforce
elastomeric and plastic materials.
Summary of the Invensi_on
3 o Most commercial fibers have a high rigidity, poor surface functional
characteristics leading to fibrillation, mainly caused by excessive friction
amonb
filaments, and poor surface affinity to most traditional elastomeric,
thermoplastic
and thermoset matrices which they reinforce.
These drawbacks and defects, which result in a degradation of
3 5 physical properties such as strength and modulus, have been driving a high
demand

~IU~UJ~
WO 92/15747 2 PC'T/U592/018~. ,.,~
for highly processable fibers which have to be easy to process through
knitting or
weaving operations a_nd do not lead to machine deposits.
According to this invention, the application of a particular
combination of surface treatment agents on the surface of previously dried
aramid
fibers using a finishing process already known; or the application of those
agents on
never-drawn never-dried aramid fibers yields a new surface treated fiber which
exhibits excellent processability characteristics in its use as a reinforcing
element for
rubber applications or as a yarn for fabric woven structures. The end use
performance of final products, using the fibers, is consequently significantly
improved.
The present invention accordingly relates to highly processable
aramid fibers of high modulus, improved surface frictional properties,
improved
scourability, low abrasion polymer depositing, low fibrillation and improved
longterm antistatic properties, having a coating of a lubricant, an
emulsifying system,
an antistatic agent, and other components, derived from a surface treatment
agent
which consists of
(a) 30 to 70% by weight of an esteroil lubricant, consisting of an ester,
composed of
(I) an alcohol component which is a branched, primary or secondary,
saturated monohydric alcohol of the general formula
R1 R2
CH3-(CHZ)h-(CH)k-(CH2)j-CH-(CH2)m-OH
z 5 wherein
R1 represents Cl-C16-alkyl,
R2 represents H, C1-C16-alkyl" if k=1 and
R2 represents Cl-C16-alkyl, if k=0,
h=OtoS
3o k=0or1
j = Oto4
m =0 to 16
and wherein the total number of carbon atoms
is below 25, and
3 ~ (II) a carboxylic acid component which is an

2i0~~~9:2,
'~".O 92!15747 ' 3 PCf/US92/0189I
unsaturated fatty acid of the general formula
R3-(COOH)s; s = 1-G
wherein
R3 represents C4-Clg-alkenyl, C4-Clg-alka_
dienyl, C4-C19-alkatrienyl, phenyl, naphthyl,
2-phenylethenyl, or which is an unsaturated
dicarboxylic acid of the general formula
HOOC-(CH = CH)n-COON
wherein n = 1 or 2,
1 o and said ester has a solidification point of
below +5°C, preferably below 0°C, a Idnematic
viscosity of 100 to 350 mm2/s (at 20°C) and an
iodine value between 30 and 140, preferably
between 30 and 80,
(b) 20 to 50% by weight of an emulsifying system which consists of
unsaturated ethoxylated fatty acids and/or unsaturated ethoxylated fatty
alcohols
and/or ethoxylated alkylamines of the general formula
R4-X-(EO)p(PO)q-OH
wherein
2 o R4 represents CS-C20-alkenyl, phenyl,
naphthyl, or Cg- or Cg-alkylphenyl,
X represents -COO-, -NH- or -O-,
EO represents an ethylene oxide unit,
PO represents a propylene oxide unit,
p =2to15and
q =OtolO,
(c) S to 15% by weight of an antistatic agent, consisting of alkali salts of
C4-C12-
alkyl sulfonates, C4-C12-alkyl phosphates or C4-C20-alkyl carboxylic acids,
(d) 0.2 to 2% by weight of a corrosion-inhibitor, and
3 0 (e) optionally additives,
and whereby the amount of said coating on said fibers is 0.05 to 2.0% by
weight,
preferably 0.2 to 1.0% by weight, of the fiber.
The coating preferably consists of
50 to 60% by weight, most preferably SS to 60% by weight of the esteroil (a),

.. v~~U~U9~
wo 9z~ls~a~ 4 PCTlU592/018. ,.."
f
25 to 40% by weight, most preferably 29 to 35% by weight of the emulsifying
system
(b), S to 10% by weight, most preferably 5 to 7% by weight of the antistatic
agent
(c), 0.3 to 1% by weight, moss preferably 0.3 to 0.5% by weight of the
corrosion
inhibitor (d) and, if desired, optionally additives (e).
The aramid fibers of this invention are further characterized by a
specific breaking strength of 2.65 to 33.5 cN/dtex (3 to 38 g/den), a specific
modulus
off 8.83 to 2207 cN/dtex (10 to 2500 g/den), a fiber to metal dynamic friction
coefficient on a 1100 dtex aramid yarn of lower than 0.55, preferably below
0.50 at
200 m/min, a fiber to metal boundary friction coefficient on a 1100 dtex
aramid yarn
l o of lower than 0.10, preferably below 0.05 at 0.016 cm/s, an amount of
deposit due to
abrasion of lower than 0.5 mg/kg of yarn, a residual finish level of lower
than 15%
by weight of the initial finish level after washing.
The fiber of this invention provides an improved blend of properties
in terms of fume emission measured by weight losses, washability of the fiber
and
cohesiveness of the fiber compared with fibers using other finishes.
Within the scope of this invention, by "fibers" are meant continuous
filaments as well as a single yarn or cord, staple fibers, fiber tows (for
example from
stretch breaking processes), yarns or flat textile skeins, staple crimped
fibers, pulps,
industrial woven, twisted, knitted, braided, spiralled or wrapped textiles
from
2 o aramids with a fiber type structure.
Aramids are such polymers that are partially, preponderantly or
exclusively composed of aromatic rings, which are connected through carbamide
bridges or optionally, in addition also through other bridging structures.
T'he
structure of such aromatic polyamides can be elucidated by the following
general
2 5 formula of repeating units:
(-CO-NH~Al-NH-CO-A2-CO-)n
wherein A1 and A2 are the same or different and signify aromatic and/or
polyaromatic and/or heteroaromatic rings, that can also be substituted.
Typically
A1 and A2 may, independently from each other, be selected from 1,4-phenylene,
3 0 1,3-phenylene, 1,2-phenylene, 4,4'-biphenylene, 2,6-naphthylene, 1,5-
naphthylene,
1,4-naphthylene, phenoxyphenyl-4,4'-diylene, phenoxyphenyl-3,4'-diylene, 2,5-
pyridylene and 2,6-quinolylene which may or may not be substituted by one or
more
substituents which may comprise haloben, C1-C4-alkyl, phenyl, carboalkoayl, C1-
C4-
alkoxyl, acr,~loxy, nitro, dialkylamino, thioalkyl, carboxyl and sulfonyl. The

2~.U5092
~,'...~!O 92/15747 J PCT/U592/01891
-CONH-group may also be replaced by a carbonyl-hydrazide (-CONHNH-) group,
azo-or azoxy-group.
Fibers derived from wholly aromatic polyamides are preferred.
Examples of aramids are poly-m-phenylene-isophthalamide and poly-p-phenylene-
terephthalamide.
Especially suitable are poly-m-phenylene-
isophthalamide fibers according to US 3,287,324 and poly-p-phenylene-
terephthalamide fibers according to US 3,869,429 and DE 22 19 703.
Additives can be used with the aramid and, in fact, it has been found
1 o that up to as much as 10 percent by weight of other polymeric material can
be
blended with the aramid or that copolymers can be used having as much as 10
percent by weight of other diamine substituted for the diamine of the aramid
or as
much as 10 percent by weight of other diacid chloride substituted for the
diacid
chloride of the aramid.
Additional suitable aromatic polyamides are of the following structure
(-NH-Ar 1-X-Ar2-NH-CO-Ar I-X-Ar2-CO-)n
in which
X represents O, S, S02, NR, N2, CR2, CO,
R represents H, CI-C4-alkyl, and
2 o Arl and Ar2 which may be same or different are selected from 1,2-
phenylene, 1,3-
phenylene and 1,4-phenylene and in which at least one hydrogen atom may be
substituted with halogen and/or Cl-C4-alkyl.
The finish formulation of this invention comprises a lubricant, an
emulsifying system, an antistatic agent and a corrosion inhibitor, and if
desired,
2 5 water and/ar other additives.
The lubricant is an esteroil which is characterized as stated above.
Examples for the alcohol compound (I) of the ester can be 2-methyl-1-propanol,
2-
butanol, 2-pentanol, 2-methyl-I-butanol, 3-methyl-3-1-butanol, 3-methyl-2-
butanol,
2-methyl-I-pentanol, 4-methyl-1-pentanol, 4-methyl-2-pentanol, 2.pentanol, 3-
3 o heptanol, 2-octanol, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexanol, 5-nonanol,
2-6-
dimethyl-4-heptanol, iso-hexadecyl alcohol or iso-tridecyl alcohol. Examples
for the
carboxylic acid component (II) can be lauroleic acid, myristoleic acid,
palmitoleic
acid, oleic acid, gadoleic acid, erucic acid, ricinoleic acid, tallow acid,
linoleic acid.
linolenic acid, fumaric acid, malefic acid, cinnamic acid, naphthaline
carboxylic acid.
3 ~ benzoic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, trimellitic acid or
pyromellitic acid.

21.050J2
WU 92115747 6 PCT/US92/Ol$~,
The kinematic viscosity of the esteroil preferably is in the range of 200
to 300 mm2/s (20°C).
The emulsifying system of this invention is as defined above.
Examples of unsaturated fatty acids are lauroleic acid, myri.stoleic acid,
palznitoleic
acid, gadoleic acid, erucic acid or ricinoleic acid, preferably oleic acid
(with 3-15
moles ethylene oxide). Examples of unsaturated fatty alcohol are elaidyl
alcohol,
erucyl alcohol, brassidyl alcohol, preferably oleyl alcohol and/or tallow
alcohol
(with 3-10 moles of EO). Further examples are Cg- or Cg-
alkylphenolethoxylates,
preferably octylphenol-or nonylphenolethoxylates (5-5 moles of EO).
t o The antistatic compounds are alkali salts, preferably sodium salts of
alkyl sulfonates (e.g. lauryl or oleyl sulfonate), alkyl phosphates like C4-
C12-alkyl
phosphates (mono/diester mixture) and salts of fatty acids, e.g. oleic acid.
The
sodium chloride content should be below 0.1%. It is also possible to use
alkylsulfates, however, they are not preferred because they hydrolyze easily
and
therefore loose their antistatic efficiency.
Useful corrosion inhibitors are diethanolamine salts of C4-C12
alkylphosphate-esters (mono/di) or amine salts of fatty acids or benzoic acid.
The formulation may optionally contain water for stabilization
reasons even before it is diluted with water in order to obtain the
concentration at
z o which it is applied to the fibers.
Additives can optionally be incorporated in the formulation if specific
properties or process conditions are required, for example adhesion, specific
cross-
linkage, UV-protection, antioxidation, pigmentation or rheological adjustment.
These additives may further comprise fungicides, bacteriocides and biocides.
2 5 A formulation for the treatment of aramid fibers can be prepared by
mixing all components at an elevated temperature, preferably at a temperature
between 30° and 40°C, in order to obtain a homogeneous and clear
oil. Thus, for
example, a mixture consisting of 550 g of isobutyl oleate, 350 g of
emulsifying system
which consists of 200 g nonylphenol ethoxylate (8 EO) and 150 g of oleic acid
3 o ethoxylate (I0 EO), 70 g of sodium decylsulfonate and 5 g of the
diethanolamine
salt of benzoic acid can be prepared. If necessary, about 25 g of water is
added to
the mixture to eliminate any turbidity. The addition of water may also be
necessan~
to obtain a stable clear oil. If required, the pH value can be adjusted to be
within 6
and 8, preferably 7, using diethanolamine or acetic acid.

2105092 ,
~''!O 92/15747 7 PCT/US92/01891
(,",.~ ,
The finish formulation of this invention is further characterized by a
viscosity of 150 to 500 mm2/s, preferably of 150 to 300 mm2/s (at
20°C), a weight-
loss of less than 25%, preferably less than 15%, after 2 h at 200°C, a
surface tension
of a 1% emulsion of less than 3S mN/m, preferably less than 32 mN/m at
20°C.
The invention further relates to a process for the production of a
highly processable aromatic polyamide fiber coated on the surface with a
surface
treatment agent.
Coating of aramid fibers with the surface treatment agent of this
invention can take place in various ways and, more specifically, for example,
1 o according to the following processes (a) and (b).
According to process (a), the application of the surface treatment
agent is made on never-dried never-drawn aramid fiber; and according to
process
(b) the application of the surface treatment agent is done on previously dried
azamid fiber, in each case using any known coating device. The finish
formulation is
15 used neat or in a diluted aqueous form, which is in a concentration of as
low as 1%
by weight.
In the preferred route for process (a), the finish formulation is applied
in a concentration of about 30% by weight in water (this means 30 parts by
weight
finish formulation + 70 parts by weight water) on a wet aramid fiber. The
emulsion
2 o treated fiber is then dried during the fiber stretching drying step at a
temperature
between 150 and 190°C, preferably at around 170°C for few
seconds (5-10 s) while
the yarn speed is around 630 m/min (workable range 120-1200 m/min).
In the preferred route of process (b) yarns and cords of aramid fibers
are passed through a dip of the finish formulation in a dipping unit to coat
them and
25 then are dried in an air heated chamber at 80 to 190°C, preferably
at 110 to 130°C
with a predetermined tension of 6 N for an untwisted 1670 dtex yarn. The most
preferred temperature for this step is about 120°C. Depending on the
dip
concentration for the finish formualtion, which may be from 1% to 100% by
weight
in water, the speed is adjusted to be from 15 to 100 m/min. By a~finish
formulation
3 0 of 100%, is meant that the finish is neat.
The finish levels for both processes, (a) and (b), are in the range of
0.05 to 2% by weight, preferably 0.2 to 1.0% by weight.
If desired, processes (a) and (b) can be conducted as a multi-step
process in which the fiber may be several times immersed in a surface
treatment
3 5 agent and in turn dried. For example, the treatment agent can be applied
an the

~1U50J2 ,
wo gzits~a; ~~ pcrius9aio~s. ',
never-dried wet fiber, then the fiber can be dried and thereafter the surface
treatment agent can be applied once more or even several times more with or
without intermediate drying.
Fibers of this invention can be used in the reinforcement of hoses,
belts, ropes and cables including optical cables, rubber goods and composite
structures (e.g. spouting goods, medical supplies, building and acoustic
material,
transport and protective equipment for civil and military applications ).
to ExamRl~
rn this example, aramid fiber in a yarn of 1100 dtex and coated by the
finish of this invention was compared with commercially-available aramid yarn
of
the same dtex coated by a standard fuiish.
The aramid fiber of this invention shows superiority, in terms of
~5 friction, especially dynamic friction F/M (200 m/min), deposit measured in
mg/kg
of yarn, and fibrillation compared to the control aramid fiber (Comparison)
which is
commercially available.
For antistatic evaluation, a generally good performance starts at -6
kV, consequently the measured value of -2.5 kV for the fiber of this invention
is
2 o excellent in terms of staticity.
The scourability (wash-off property) is a very important factor since
the residual finish level after a washing-step (measured in %) impacts any
subsequent finishing operation. Scourability values mentioned in the Table
below
were obtained on an industrial scale using fabrics made of the yarn of this
invention
2 5 and compared with a control yarn which was a commercial product of the
same
denier treated with a standard finish. The values were confirmed in the
laboratory
by washing the yarns two times with soft water at SO°C using 100 inl of
water for 10
g of yarn.
Friction coefficients were determined according to the following
3 o method: A package of yarn is threaded through a tensioning device, between
a
guide roll and two strain gauges, and onto a take-up roll driven by a variable
speed
motor. The two strain gauges record Ti and T2 input and output tension
respectively. The coefficient of friction is computed according to the
formula:
Tl/T' = e~ (a ' ~

2105092
~0 9zns~4~ 9 ~crius9ziots9'
...
where a is the friction angle and f the friction coefficient (fiber to fiber,
fiber to
metal or fiber to ceranic, depending on whether a polished chrome or ceramic
pin
was used). The Rothsci~ild friction meter R-1182 has been used according to
the
standard procedure known in the art.
The deposit due to abrasion was measured on a "Staff-Tester G 555"
(Zweigle, West Germany) with which the weight of the abraded fiber-material
arising from fiber to fiber friction was determined.
The fibrillation index was determined on a "G 566" apparatus
(Zweigle, West Germany).
Comparison of yvs_ic a~~R .rtiPt
Com- ThlS
(1100 dtex Fiberl narison Invention
1. Friction
. Fiber/Fiber (0.016 cm/s) 0.22 0.215
( 128 cm/s) 0.28 0.265
Fiber/Metal (0.016 cm/s) 0.12 0.045
(128 cm/s) 0.30 0.265
(200 m/min) 0.70 0.55
2 0 2. Deposit (mg/kg) 10 0.5
3. Fibrillation index 21 2-5
4. Scourability 46% 9%
(Residual knish level)
x m 1 2
In this example, a fabric woven from the yarn of this invention and a
comparison fabric woven from commercially available yarn having a standard
finish
were tested for ballistic performance.
The fabrics were made of 1111 dtex (1000 denier) yarns.
3 0 Usually in the area of high tenacity fiber the weaving operation of
ballistic fabrics leads to strength losses usually quantified by extracting
the yarn out
of the fabric and measuring the tenacity according to the standard procedures
known in the art. The following Table shows that the product of this invention
yields a significant advantage since, in a heavy fabric construction
(typically 12 ends
3 5 per cm), the strength loss is reduced by half (7 vs. 14%). The ballistic
performance

WO 92/i5747 2o PCT/US92/Oi89
21009 ~~2
(VSp: see test procedure) is also improved by 8% at the greige fabric level
and S to
8% at the finished level (meaning after final fabric treatment).
In the case of light weight fabric, typically 8 ends per cm, the ballistic
performance is also increased by 4.5% at the greige fabric level.
Strerneth Conve;lion and ,$~~j,~~ir pPrt'r,rmance
Fabric Grade Strength Strength Percentage
Loss, Loss, improvement
This Com- in Ballistic
1 o Invention parison Performance
V50 of This
Invention vs.
om arp icon
15 HEAVY FABRIC of the
state of the art:
1. greige 5%-9% 14%-18%
2. ballistic perform.
(greige fabric) + g%
2 0 3. ballistic perform.
(finished fabric) + 5-8%
LT('',T~T FARRTC" of thA
stat~g of the art
2 5 1. greige 0-2% 0-2%
2. ballistic perfornn.
(greige fabric) + 5%
Ballistic tests
3 0 The ballistic test method for determining V50 was carried out
according to the 1\TATO standardization agreement STANAG 2920.
The V50 ballistic limit velocity for a material or armour is defined as
that velocity for which the probability of penetration of the chosen
projectiles is
exactly 0.~, using the Up and Down firing method and calculation described
below.

210~09~
':';U 92/15747 1 ~ I PCT/U592/0189!
The Up and Down firing method:
The first round shall be loaded with the amount of propellant
calculated to give the projectile a velocity equivalent to the estimated VSO
ballistic
limit of the armour. If the first round fired produces a complete penetration,
the
second round shall be loaded with a fixed decrement of propellant calculated
to
produce a velocity about 30 m/s lower than the first. If the first round fired
results
in a partial penetration, the second round shall be loaded with a fixed
increment of
propellant calculated to produce a velocity about 30 m/s higher than the first
round.
Upon achieving the first set of penetration reversals, the propellant charge
should
1o be adjusted with the fixed amount to yield an increment or decrement of
velocity of
about 15 m/s. Firing will then continue in accordance with a given
procedure'to
obtain an estimate of the VSO (BLP) [Ballistic Limit Protection].
VSO calculation:
After a number of projectiles have been fired the VSO is calculated as
the mean of the velocities recorded for the fair impact the fair impacts
consisting of
the three highest partial velocities for partial penetration and the three
lowest
velocities for complete penetration provided that all six velocities fall
within a
bracket of 40 m/s.
In this example, knitting processability evaluation was carried out
under the following conditions: ELHA Circular Knitting Machine (Model RRU),
test duration 4 hours, machine speed 6 7 0 rpm, knitting speed 1 S m/min ;
knitting
2 5 construction 3 stitches /cm .

WO 92/1547 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .
~'CT'/US92/018. .,~tg. ,
Fnd-Llee rmance of renyYarn T~
Perfo Diffe 8g
Yarn Curt- Com- .,
This Invention
TYPe parison parison Process
0 T/m 120 T/m (a) and (b)
0 T/m
Fibril- high none none
lation
Knit not
Design uniform uniform uniform
Deposit build-up, slight no
deposit deposit deposit
Coverage not low optimum
Factor uniform
2 o A.s can be seen in the table, above, optimum productivity levels and
maximum value in use could be obtained using yarns of this invention versus
the
Comparison yarns. The state of the art product is used twisted. The results
clearly
.show the advantage related to the possibility of avoiding the twisting
operation by
using yarns of this invention.
'' am 1 4
:~'s In this example, fatigue trials on hoses, made using yarn of this
> ~ invention, were carried out to the Ford specification with pressures of I-
3.5 bar at 0.5
;i
Hz according to the most severe trapezoid' waveform.
r
3 o With Comparison yarn, 50,000 cycles to failure are generally obtained
and are sufficient to pass the test. However, a result of 80,000 cycles has
been
obtained for five hose samples containing yarns of this invention. This shows
a
significant superiority of the yarns of .this invention in terms of fatigue
resistance.
J J

210'5092
~:;;'"O 92/15747 ~ ... PCT/US92/01891
Example ~
In this example, the strength e~ciency conversion of cords made
using yarns of this invention was compared with that of cords made using
Comparison yarns.
Compared with commercially available aramid based construction, up
to 30% better suength efficiency conversion was obtained by using yarn of this
invention for cord construction. If a cord is made of several yarns, the
strength of
the cord theoretically should be equal to the strength of each yarn,
multiplied by the
number of yarns, which is never the case in practice. However, the finish of
this
1 o invention helps to overcome this problem.
In a laboratory test, the strength of a parallel construction made of
three commercial 1100 dtex (1000 filaments) aramid yarns with a final twisting
of
140 T/m (twists per meter) was determined to be 524 N. This was compared with
a
parallel cord construction made of three 1100 dtex yarns which were treated
with
15 the finish of this invention (0.8% by weight finish level). The finally
obtained
strength of a yarn with a twist level of 140 T/m was 592 N which corresponds
to a
30% increase.
m 1
2 o In this example, several qualities of yarn of this invention were tested
and compared with those qualities as exhibited by Comparison yarn.
Test conditions:
Weight loss is measured by the percentage of finish material lost after
25 exposing the fibers at 230°C for 8 hours. The finish percentage is
determined by
solvent extraction before and after the heat exposure.
The percentage of residue after scouring is also determined by solvent
extraction of the residual finish remaining on the fiber after washing
(scouring) the
fiber according to washing procedures known and applied in the industry. The
3 o percentage is calculated versus the initial finish level determined prior
to the
scouring step.
The fiber to metal (F/M) friction coefficient is measured at 150
m/min using the Rothschild equipment and method as described previously.

i
WO 92/1579 i PCi'/U592/O18 ,;:; ,.
2105~g~ 4
Finish weight Finish remaining F/M
loss on after friction
Fiber heatinl;r_ couri ~~i 'g~
This invention 5 8 0.50 '
{"non-fuming")
B
This invention 11 14 0.47 i
to
Comparison 23 45 0.65
All yarns were 1000 denier, 670 filament and were coated in the dried
state using a neat finish formulation at a rate of 750 m/minute to a level of
0.8%.
The finish of A included a 70/30 mixture of benzene tricarboxylic acid
and benzene dicarboxylic acid as the carboxylic acid component for the
esteroil.
The finish of B included a 70/30 mixture of C-18/C-16 alkenyl monocarboxylic
acid
component for the esteroil. '
2 0 The finish of the Comparison was C-12/C-15 mineral oil-based as
disclosed in Research Disclosure No. 195, disclosure 19520, July, 1980.
By this example, it is noted that finish formulations of this invention in
which a carboxylic acid component for the esteroil is used having more than
one
carboxylic acid group, that is, where n=2-6, the finish formulation yields
2 5 considerably less weight loss on heating. Less weight loss on heating
means less
fuming in use and operation at elevated temperatures.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2010-03-02
Letter Sent 2009-03-02
Letter Sent 2003-12-29
Grant by Issuance 2002-10-22
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-10-21
Inactive: Final fee received 2002-08-08
Pre-grant 2002-08-08
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-06-25
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-06-25
Letter Sent 2002-06-25
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-06-13
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-04-02
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-10-03
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1999-03-11
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1999-03-11
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1999-03-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-02-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-02-22
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-09-17

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2001-12-20

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1998-03-02 1997-12-16
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 1999-03-02 1999-01-04
Request for examination - standard 1999-02-22
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2000-03-02 1999-12-06
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2001-03-02 2000-12-08
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2002-03-04 2001-12-20
Final fee - standard 2002-08-08
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2003-03-03 2003-01-02
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2005-03-02 2003-11-25
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2004-03-02 2003-12-22
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2006-03-02 2006-02-07
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard 2007-03-02 2007-02-08
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard 2008-03-03 2008-02-08
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
SERGE REBOUILLAT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-04-29 14 515
Representative drawing 2002-06-13 1 5
Claims 1994-04-29 6 191
Abstract 1995-08-16 1 43
Claims 2002-04-01 6 229
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-11-02 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1999-03-10 1 173
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2002-06-24 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-04-13 1 170
Correspondence 2003-12-28 1 18
PCT 1993-08-26 31 1,110
Correspondence 2002-08-07 1 38
Correspondence 2004-04-29 46 2,876
Correspondence 2004-06-15 1 22
Correspondence 2004-07-13 1 28
Fees 1996-12-17 1 84
Fees 1995-12-12 1 94
Fees 1994-11-23 2 137
Fees 1993-08-26 1 49