Language selection

Search

Patent 2107707 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2107707
(54) English Title: PIPE SUPPORT
(54) French Title: SUPPORT DE TUYAUTERIE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


- 5 -
ABSTRACT
A pipe support is used for supporting the pipe on a roof. The support is a
molded thermoplastic component with a pedestal in the form of a hollow, truncated
pyramid. A concave pipe saddle is formed in the top of the pedestal. An integral flashing
flange surrounds the pedestal, at its base, and projects outwardly from the base for
integration into the structure of a roof, either a sloping roof or a flat roof.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-4-
CLAIMS
1. A pipe support for supporting a pipe on a roof comprising a pedestal having
a base, a top side, a concave like saddle in the topside and a flashing flange around the
pedestal, projecting outwardly from the base.
2. A support according to Claim 1 wherein the pedestal and the flashing flange
are integral.
3. A support according to Claim 1 wherein the pedestal and flashing flange are
integrally formed from molded thermoplastic material.
4. A support according to Claim 3 wherein the pedestal comprises a hollow,truncated pyramid.
5. A support according to any one of claims 1 through 4 wherein the pedestal
comprises a plurality of pipe saddles.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The present invention relates to pipe supports and more particularly to
supports for supporting pipes on roofs.
The current practice in supporting a pipe on a roof is to use stacked lumber,
nailed together, or concrete blocks. The pipe is set onto the wood or concrete and is held
in place using a clamp. Pipes of the type in question may be, for example, those used for
the supply of natural gas.
Premanufactured supports are known for use with flat roofs, with these are
generally unsuitable for use with sloped, shingled roofs, where the support must be held in
place against slipping on the roof and where the support should not interfere with the
impervious properties of the roof. It is also desirable that the support is esthetically
acceptable.
Pipe supports according to the present invention are intended to mitigate one
or more of these problems.
According to the present invention there is provided a pipe support for
supporting a pipe on a roof comprising a pedestal having a base, a top side, a concave pipe
saddle in the top side and a flashing flange around the pedestal, projecting outwardly from
the base.
The flashing flange may be integrated into a shingle roof, with one side of
the flange under an adjacent shingle course above the support and the opposite side
overlapping the shingles below. The support flange may a1so be mopped into a tarred, flat
roof. The support is preferably an integral, hollow plastic molding, with the pedestal in
the forrn of a hollow, truncated pyramid.
In the accompanying drawings, which illustrate an exemplary embodiment
of the present invention:
, ~
t ~ ~ ~

- 2 - 2 1 ~ 7 7 ~ 7
Figure 1 is an isometric view of a pipe support according to the
present invention; and
Figure 2 is a longitudinal cross-section of the support of Pigure 1.
Referring to the accompanying drawings, there is illustrated a pipe support
10 molded integrally from a synthetic therrnoplastic material. The support includes a
pedestal 12 in the form of a hollow, truncated wramid. The pedestal has upwardlyconvergent end walls 14, upwardly convergent side walls 16 and a flat top wall 18.
Extending across the top wall, parallel to the end walls 14 is a saddle 20 in the form of a
semi-circular recess.
At the base of the pedestal 12 the support has a peripheral flashing 22. This
is a flat flange projecting outwardly from the base of the pedestal.
In use, the support is placed on a roof at a location where a pipe is to be
supported. On a sloping roof, the flashing 22 is inserted under the adjacent shingles on the
upper side, while the remainder of the flashing flange rests on the lower shingles. Thus,
the support is integ~ated into the shingled roof without interfering with the impervious
nature of the roof in any way. The support is aesthetically more pleasing than a stack of
lumber or concrete blocks.
On a flat roof, the support may be set on the flat roof during construction
and mopped in when the roof is tarred.
The support of the present invention provides a pipe support of e~cellent
stability that can easily be incorporated to any type of roof structure.
While one embodiment of the present invention has been described in the
foregoing, it is to be understood that other embodiments are possible within the scape of
the present invention. The dimensions of the support may be varied widely to
' '''."~''.''~''"
:. ~:'...~':,

2 ~ ~7~7
- 3 -
accommodate pipes of different sizes and different pipe heights above the roof. The
support may, where necessary, be provided with plural saddles in the top surface in order
to accommodate plural pipes. It is therefore to be understood that the invention is to be
considered limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
'' ~ ' ':. :,'
,:,. .,, ~ .,',
. . -; .

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2004-10-05
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2004-10-05
Inactive: Agents merged 2004-04-01
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2004-03-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-10-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-09-04
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-06-26
Inactive: Office letter 2001-06-26
Revocation of Agent Request 2001-05-18
Letter Sent 2000-06-07
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2000-06-07
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2000-06-07
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-05-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2000-05-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-04-06

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-10-06

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-09-20

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 1997-10-06 1997-09-29
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 1998-10-05 1998-10-01
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 1999-10-05 1999-10-01
Request for examination - small 2000-05-29
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2000-10-05 2000-09-29
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2001-10-05 2001-10-05
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - small 09 2002-10-07 2002-09-20
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
PAUL CEY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-07-11 1 7
Claims 1995-06-02 1 41
Abstract 1995-06-02 1 63
Drawings 1995-06-02 1 59
Description 1995-06-02 3 188
Reminder - Request for Examination 2000-06-05 1 115
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2000-06-06 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-11-30 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2004-05-12 1 167
Correspondence 2001-05-17 1 24
Correspondence 2001-06-25 1 16
Fees 1996-10-01 1 39
Fees 1995-09-18 1 30