Language selection

Search

Patent 2111998 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2111998
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION AND CONCENTRATION OF RUBELLA VIRUS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE PURIFICATION ET DE CONCENTRATION DU VIRUS DE LA RUBEOLE.
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12N 7/02 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/20 (2006.01)
  • C12Q 1/24 (2006.01)
  • G01N 1/34 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BERNHARDT, DIETER (Germany)
  • GIESENDORF, BERNHARD (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • DADE BEHRING MARBURG GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • DADE BEHRING MARBURG GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1993-12-21
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-06-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 42 43 491.2 (Germany) 1992-12-22

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the disclosure
Process for the purification and concentration of rubella
virus
The invention relates to a process for the purification
and concentration of rubella virus for diagnostic and
therapeutic purposes by reversible binding to natural or
synthetic particles which carry receptors for the virus.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 9 -
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for the purification and concentration of
rubella virus by reversible binding to natural or
synthetic particles which carry receptors for this
virus, where the virus is isolated from a
suspension, detached from the particles and
subsequently isolated, wherein the binding of the
virus takes place in the presence of doubly charged
ions, and the release takes place in the presence of
a chelating agent for doubly charged ions.
2. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
doubly charged ions are Mg2+ and/or Ca2+.
3. The process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the
chelating agent is EDTA.
4. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
particle is an erythrocyte.
5. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
particle is a synthetic particle to which an
isolated virus receptor is bound.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


'' 2 ~
sEHRINGwERKE AXTIENGESELLSCE~FT 92/~ 031 - Ma 940
Foreign text
Process for the puxification and concentrakion of rubella
virus
The invention relates to a proce~ ~or the purification
and concentration of rubella virus for diagno~tic and
therapeutic purposes by rever~ible binding to natural or
synthetic particles which carry receptor~ for the viru~.
Proce~ses have already been di~clo~ed for the i~olation
of, for exa~ple, rubella antigen from th~ supernatant
~rom infected animal cells, ~uch as, for example, the
i~olation by ultracentrifugation, ~hich tak~ place
either as pelleting or a~ di~ferential centrifugation by
mean8 of a density gradient (A. Paris-Hamelin et al.,
~. Virol. Meth. 10, 1985, 355 - 361). Other processe~ use
ultrafiltration through filter areas with different
eparation properties or precipitation proce~e~ ~uch as,
for example, those with polyethylene glycol (P~G)
(D.S. Bowden et al., J. gen. VirolO 65 (1984), 933 -
943)-
It ha~ also been di~closed how to co~centrate and purify20 influenzaviru~ using erythrocyte~ (B. Giesendorf et al.,
~iru~ Re earch 1, 1984, 655 - 667). Ths elimination takes
place in thi~ case enzymatic~lly with the aid o~ neur-
ami~ldase.
The known ~olutions for the purification of rubella
antigen have, however, inter alia the disadvantage that
the viru~ antigen obtained in this way can be contami-
nated to a greater or le~er extent with cellular pro-
teins and/or other cellular constituent~.
Furthermore, components o~ the ~etal calf serum (FCS~
used ~or the cell cultivation o~ten occur a~
co~tamination.
The object of the invention was therefore to find a
-
~ ' ' ' ,

2111~.3~
- 2 ~
~imple process in which the yield is improved and the
impurities are minimized.
It has been found, surprisingly, that human or ani~al
erythrocytes (which differ markedly fro~ viruse~ in their
density and their size) also under certain conditions
reversibly bind rubella virus, the re~ulting complex of
cell and virus can then be removed ea6ily by 8uitable
proce~ses from the medium in which the virus has been
repliaated, and then the virus can under the condition~
according to the in~ention be eliminated ~rom the
erythrocytes and, where appropriate, further concen-
tra~ed.
The process according to the invention can also be u~ed
for the puri~;.cation and concentration of those virus
constituents which reversibly bind to erythrocytes undsr
the condition~ according to the invention.
The term viru~ for the purpose o~ this invention also
includes these virus constituents.
The invention therefore relate~ to a proce B for the
puri~ication and concentration o~ rubella virus and virus
particle~ by re~arsible binding to natural or ~ynthetic
particles which carry receptors for this ~irus, where the
~iru~ particles are iæolated ~rom the u~pension, and the
~irus i5 detached from the particles and subsequently
isolated, where ~he binding of the ~irus takes place in
the pre~ence of doubly charged ions, and the release
takes place in thé pre~ence of a chelating agent ~or
doubly charged ions.
A pre~erred proce~s in thi~ connection is one in which
the doubly charged ions are Mg2+ and/or Ca2+.
The pre$erred proce~ is alRo one in which the chelating
agent is EDTA.
~ . . . . . ~ . ~ . - - .. .
,
;: ,.

-- 3
An advantageous process is one in which the particle i~
an erythrocyte.
For the purification and concentration in thi~ case, for
example, the virus-containing supernatant from infected
cells i8 adjusted to a p~ of 4 ~ 10, pre~erably 6 - 8,
particularly preferably about 7. Methods suitable for
thi~ are known to the skilled worker. The temperature
during this i8 0C to 30C, preferably 0 - 10C~ very
preferably about 4C.
The salt concentration in the solution which contains the
viruse~ is moreo~er adjusted so that, at the time o~ the
binding of the viruses to the erythrocyte~, it contain~
in respect of Mg2+ 4 x 10-4 to 0.4, pre~erably 10-3 to 10-2,
particularly preferably 3-5 x 10-3 mol/l, and in re~pect
of Cà2~ 3 x 10-4 to 0.4, preferably 10-3 to 10-2, partiau-
larly preferably 2-4 x 10-3 mol/l.
Chlorides are preferably employed as compounds.
The proce 8 according to the invention can be carried out
with in each case one type o~ ion~.
Both ion~ are preférably employed, and very pr~ferably in
approximately the ~ame molar co~aentrations.
Erythrocyte able to bind rubellavirus are added to the
solution described abo~e. Erythrocytes ~rom a human,
! guinea pig, pigeon, wether, ~heep, rabbit or hor e are
used advantageously.
The concentration o~ th`e erythrocyte~ in~this case i~
0.04 - 4% by Yolume, preferably about 0.4% by ~olume.
The i~cubation is carried out ~or 1 min - 48 h, pre~er-
ably 20 min - 4 h, ~ery preerably about 1 h.
A~ a~vantageou process i~ also one in which, for reason~
o~ economy of work, incubation i9 carried out 'lo~er-
night".
: :' ' . ' '
.' ~ ' . '

-~. 211~ng
-- 4
The complex of virus and cell is removed by ~ui~able
method~. Centrifugation and filtration proces~e~ known
per se to the skilled worker are particularly advanta-
geou~ for thi~.
To eliminate the virus, a complexing agent which com-
plexe~ doubly charged cations i6 addedO Complexing agent~
of this type are known per se to tha skilled worker and
pre~erably used, beside~ EDTA, are biodegradable complex-
ing agent as disclosed, for example, in EP 0 488 168.
The complexing agent concentration required for the
eli~ination i~ advantageously about 3 x 10-2 to 3 x 10'3
mol/l and very particularly ad~antageously about 7 x 10-3
mol/l. The elimination and elution advantageously take~
place at a pH of 6 - 12, particularly ad~antageously at
a pH of about 9.
Since erythrocyte~ and virus di~er greatly in ~ize and
density, they can subæequently easil.y be separated ~rom
one another by suitable methods known per ~e to the
skilled wor~er, and thi~ ~eparation advantageously takea
place by low-speed centrifugation, in which ca~e ~he
erythrocytes ediment and the virus remain~ in the
~upernatant. The op~imal centri~uga~ion conditions can
easily be determined experi~entally where appropriate.
It i~ al~o ad~antageous to employ the process in a column
- 25 proceR~ which includes the following ~tep~:
a3 preparation of a colum~ with ~uitable erythrocyte
b) addition of the viru~-containing ~olution taking
into account the required ionic conditions,
whereupon the binding to the erythrocytes takes
place, -
c) washing of the colu~n and ~ub~equently
d) elution o~ the viru. or of the ~iru~ constituents by
. : ' ' . ' .".' : :.............. ' `
. i .

2 ~
-- 5
addition of the elution bu~er.
After the disclosure o~ the process according to the
invention it is easy for the skilled worker to optimiza
a column process of this type.
Variations which are traceable to the pre~ent inventi~e
principle are conceivable for the ~aid proce~s step
Thus, for example, the cellular virus receptor can be
used after isolation, for example ~rom the erythrocytes.
The virus receptor can in this case be coupled to sedi-
mentable plastic particles or magnetizable carriers.
A viru~ receptor o~ this type can also be prepared in an
alternative way, ~or example by genetic manipulation,
The advantage o the present prccess i~ that the ~irus i8
concentrated and, at the same time, unwa~ted contaminan 8
are remo~ed with simple means.
The ~ollowing example is i~tended to illu~trate the
i~vention but not to restrict it.
~xample:
Material required
- 10 l of crude rubella viru~ ~uspen~ion
- immobilize~ wether erythrocytes
- 2 N HCl
- 2 l PBS, pH 7.0 with
O . 1 g/l MgCl2 ~ X 6 H2O and
0.132 g/l of CaCla x 2 H2O
- 0.2 1 PBS, pEI 7.5
- 0.5 g EDTA
Ad~orptio~
h
' . ':. ' -.
':, '
;'' "',' ' :

2 ~
- 6 -
10 1 of crude rubella virus 6u~pension were cooled to 4C
and adjusted to pH 7 with 2 N HCl. 160 ml of erythrocyte
~uæpension (25% by volume) were added; this correspond~
to a final concentration of 0.4% by volume. The mixture
was ætirred with a stirrer at 4C ~or l - 16 h. The
suspension was centrifuged in 1 l centrifuge cups in a
Cryofuge 8000 (Heraeus, Germany) at 4C and 2700 rpm for
1 0 ~rli~ .
After the centrifugation, the erythrocyte pellet-was
resu~pended in 1000 ml of PBS, pH 7Ø A second
centri~ugation wa~ carried out undex the abovementioned
conditions, and the ~upernatant was decanted off.
Preparation of the elution buffer
0-25% EDTA (ClOHl~N2O8Na2 2H2O; SERVA, Order No. 11280)
was added to P~S p~ 7.5 without Mg2~/Ca2~ and completely
dis~ol~ed. The ~olutio~ was ~ub~equently titrated to pH 9
with 2 N NaOH and cooled to 4C in a cold room.
The elution buffer i8 prepared fre~hly each time where
poesible.
The erythrocyte pellet obtained by the aboveme~tioned
proce~ wa cautiou~ly u~pended in 1~100 of the volume
o~ the crude viru~ suspension u~ed (10 1 ~ 100 ml) of
elution buffer and gently ~tirred at 4C for 15 min.
The su~pen~ion waæ centri~uged in a Cryofuge 8000 at 4C
and 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant contained the
large~t part of the ~irus employed and wa~ called "eluate
1". Eluate 1 was centri~uged once more to clarify ~rom
remaining erythrocyte~: 4C, 3000 rpm, 10 min.
- The erythrocyte pellet was eluted once more under
identical conditions~ this re~ulted in "eluate 2".
The eluates can be pooled or further processed
,: .
:.

- 7 ~ 3
separately.
The purificatlon was checked inter alia by employi~g an
immunoblot quantification. This entailed the proteins
being fractionated in a reducing SDS polyacrylamide gel
(Laem~li, U.K., Nature 227 ~1970), pages 680 - 685), th~
proteins being transferred to nitrocellulo~e (sowen~ B .
et al., Nucleic Acids Re~. 8 (1980~, page~ 1 - 20) and
the protein band being detected by the following detec-
tion system which i~ know~ per se to the skilled worker,
employing rubella i~munoglobulin, biotinylated anti-human
immu~oglobulin and peroxida~e-labeled strepta~idin.
The quantification of an immunoblot of this tXpe using a
~canner i~ depicted in Figures 1 and 2, where 1, ~2 and
C identify structural protein of rubella virus. PEGAg
(Fig. 1) i~ material processed according to the prior art
(Bowden et al. (1984)) and EryAg (Fig. 2) i~ matsrial
purified by the process according to the invention.
A 2D-lD video den~itometer (Biotech/F:ischer Software) wa~
employed for the sca~ning (peak hsight: 5, i~tegration
20 resolution: 100%, peak width: 2, graph length: 15).
.
. , . .:

~ 5i3
De~criptio~ of the igure~
Figure l: Immunoblot quantification of a rubella antigen
obtained by PEG precipitation.
Figure 2~ Immunoblot quantification of a rubella antigen
i~olated by the process according to the inven-
tio~.
El, E2, C: Structural proteins of rubella virus
.
-
.
:' ' ' ' '~- :

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2111998 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2001-12-21
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-12-21
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-12-21
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2000-12-21
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-06-23

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-12-21

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1999-12-10

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 1997-10-27
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1997-12-22 1997-11-27
Registration of a document 1998-12-07
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1998-12-21 1998-12-11
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1999-12-21 1999-12-10
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DADE BEHRING MARBURG GMBH
Past Owners on Record
BERNHARD GIESENDORF
DIETER BERNHARDT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-06-23 1 186
Descriptions 1994-06-23 8 304
Claims 1994-06-23 1 63
Abstract 1994-06-23 1 27
Cover Page 1994-06-23 1 52
Reminder - Request for Examination 2000-08-22 1 116
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-01-18 1 183
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2001-02-01 1 169
Fees 1996-11-29 1 83
Fees 1995-12-01 1 82