Language selection

Search

Patent 2114102 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2114102
(54) English Title: NATAMYCIN TREATMENT OF DRIED WHOLE KERNEL GRAINS
(54) French Title: TRAITEMENT DE GRAINS ENTIERS SECHES PAR LA NATAMYCINE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 43/90 (2006.01)
  • A01C 01/06 (2006.01)
  • A23B 09/14 (2006.01)
  • A23B 09/26 (2006.01)
  • A23B 09/28 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KING, BRUCE DEXTER (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CONAGRA, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • CONAGRA, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: DIMOCK STRATTON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2002-09-17
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-07-10
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-02-04
Examination requested: 1999-06-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1992/005792
(87) International Publication Number: US1992005792
(85) National Entry: 1994-01-24

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/735,977 (United States of America) 1991-07-25

Abstracts

English Abstract


Polyene antibiotics, particularly natamycin, are used to protect stored dried
whole kernel grain against fungi growth, and
any attendant mycotoxin contamination.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-9-
WHAT IS CLAIMED
1. A process for rendering whole kernel grain substantially free
from fungi contamination comprising:
drying whole kernel grain to a moisture content of less than about 15%,
and treating said dried grain with 5.5 to 55 ppm, based on the weight of the
grain
of natamycin.
2. The process of Claim 1 wherein the grain comprises at least one
grain selected from the group consisting of soy beans, corn, oats, barley,
grass
seed, wheat, rye, rice and sunflower seeds.
3. The process of Claim 2 wherein the polyene is comminuted
before admixing with the whole kernel grain.
4. The process of Claim 2 wherein the treating comprises spraying
the polyene onto the whole kernel grain.
5. The process of Claim 4 further comprising spraying a
suspension comprising the polyene and a non-toxic carrier liquid.
6. The process of Claim 5 wherein the suspension includes a
wetting agent.
7. A storage-stable grain product comprising whole kernel grain
and a polyene antibiotic.

-10-
8. The product of Claim 7 wherein the polyene antibiotic
comprises natamycin.
9. The product of Claim 7 wherein the whole kernel grain
comprises at least one grain selected from the group consisting of soy beans,
corn,
oats, barley, lawn grass seed, wheat, rye and rice.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


W~ 931~t72~ i'CT/L'S92/05792
TITLE
NATAMYCIN TREATMENT OF
DRIED VU'HOLE KERNEL, GRAINS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a process for treating dried whole
kernel grains with natamycin to control and/or prevent the growth of
yeasts, molds and other fungi.
It is desirable to store whole driedkernel grain under
conditions of minimal microorganism attack, with its attendant formation
of toxins. Fungi attack is particularly troublesome because of the high
propensity of fungi to attack grain and the toxic nature of mycotoxins that
certain fungi may generate. Perhaps the most prevalent and
mycotoxin-producing organisms that attack grain are molds; particularly
~'r~ssa~ium, ~'enicillaum and Aspergillus molds.
Silo storage has not been wholly successful in long term
grain or ensilage starage where mycotoxin production must be limited.
For example, the conventional practice of ensiling is the storage of high
moisture content fodder which is fermented to increase the acidity of the
fodder wherein the acidity controls but does not prevent the formation of
significant quantities of toxins (i.e., toxins which are released by the
metabolic activities of certain fungi). Fermentation has the disadvantage
in that it decreases the food nutrient value of the stored fodder.
z5 The use of antibiotics to control organism growth on
ensilage stored in a silo is not generally practiced because relatively high
concentrations of antibiotics normally would be required for the
prolonged periods associated with the conventional high moisture
environment of silo storage.
3o It has long been recognized that drying the whole kernel
grain before storage is necessary to prevent immediate and virtually total
organism attack of grain which has a high moisture content. However,
drying alone does not provide adequate long-term protection of whole
kernel grain, such as from harvest to harvest.
35 Currently, the generally accepted practice to protect grain
from spoilage while being stored is to treat the grain with propionic acid.

iV~ ~3J01720 Pf.'t'/11S92/~579,.
Propionic acid is sprayed onto the grain normally at the rate of 1-S
pounds per ton of grain. This treatment is not wholly successful,
especially for long-term storage. The propionic acid is volatile and may
evaporate. Further, the propionic acid is corrosive to the handling
s equipment, particularly damaging to pumps unless they are made of
expensive corrosion resistant metal. More importantly, propionic acid
will not effectively control certain species of molds, fungi, yeast, etc.,
that
attack grain in storage.
Natamycin is known generally to be useful as an antifungal
. to agent. Natamycin is a member of the polyene family of antimycotics. This
family is characterized by a macrolide ring of carbon atoms closed by
lactoniZation and pOSSeSSBS a series of conjugated double bonds.
Members of this family can be classified by the number of double bonds
and whether ~or not the compound contains a glycosidically linked
15 carbohydrate. The compound natamycin is a tetraene with a molecular
weight of about 6b6, an empirical formula corresponding generally to
c33~47N013~ ~d contains a glycosidically-linked carbohydrate moiety,
mycosamine. Natamycin has an isoelectric point of pH 6.5. The structure
of natamycin exists in two configurations: the enol-structure and the keto-
20 structure.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved
process for storing dried whole kernel grain. Particularly, the invention
relates to a process for treating grain with a polyene to reduce the
damage associated with a fungi attack.
25 Although particular emphasis is placed upon using
' natamycin to treat dried whole kernel grain, the present invention is
intended to encompass using any member of the polyene family which is
effective in controlling and/or reducing fungal contamination during
storage of the dried whole kernel gain.
34
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process and a product
produced thereby which is obtained by using a polyene antibiotic,
particurally natamycin, to control and/or protect dried whole kernal grain
35 from fungi contamination. The invention also controls and/or prevents
contamination of the whole kernal grain from mycotoxins which may be

CT/US92J05792
~~ 93/01720
_3_ . .
released by the fungi. The invention permits dried whole kernal grain to
be stored for prolonged periods of time while remaining substantially free
from fungal contamination. 'The polyene may be sprayed, admixed, etc.,
with the dried whole kernal grain by any technique which is adequate to
provide the polyene to the whole kernal grain in an effective manner.
DETAILED DlES~RIPTiQN OF THE IhTVEI~T'TI_Ohl
The present invention relates to the treatment of stored
dried whole kernel grain with small quantities of an antibiotic from the
polyene family, such as natamycin. The presence of a polyene inhibits
fungi attack such as the growth of fungi, mold, yeast, etc., and possible
resultant mycotoxin contamination. fine invention . also permits grain to
be stored for longer periods of time and improves the quality of the grain
which is eventually removed from storage ~e.g., the removed grain is
substantially free of fungal contamination).
In accordance with the invention, the term polyene
antibiotic defines and refers to one or more members of the recognized
class of antibiotics, released by fermentation of a species of the
Streptorrayces genus, that are particularly effective against fungi. Also
2o encompassed are the equivalent polyene derivates, such as esters, salts,
and the like. Further, other pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives of
natamycin may used to practice the invention which are effective to
control and/or prevent contamination by the fungi. Generally, the
preferred polyene for use in the present invention comprises natamycin
because natamycin will typically give prolonged antifungal protection at a
relatively low non-toxic dosage, and accordingly, natamycin is economical
for prolonged grain storage.
'Biologically effective amount" defines that the polyene
antibiotic is present in a sufficient quantity and will remain active for a
3o time sufficient to give adequate antifungal control for the contemplated
usage of the stored grain; that is control to adequately preserve the grain
against fungi, mold, yeast, etc., growth and mycotoxin contamination over
the entire storage period.
"Grain" defines and refers to one or more species of grain
that is to be stored dry for a prolonged time, such as from harvest until
spring, for seed grain, or from harvest to harvest for continuous cereal

WO 93/U~?24 : : Pf.'T/g.JS92/OS?9~
_4_
manufacture. Particularly contemplated are monocots gains for use in
human food products and animal feed such as cereal grains, seeds, etc.,
including corn, popcorn, oats, barley, rice, rye, wheat, grass seeds, canola
and sunflower seeds, soy beans, etc.
s "Whole kernel" grain defines and refers to grain that has
not been substantially crushed or otherwise fractured, and that has its hull
generally intact encompassing the grain. Thus the term whole kernel
grain defense and includes grains, such as corn, that is on its growth
substrate such as a corn cob, and/or individual kernels. However, this
to term does not include grain, such as many conventional animal feeds
(e.g., poultry feed), where the individual kernels have been crushed or
fractured to break open the protective kernel hulls:
"Stored" defines any technique whereby the grain is kept in
its dried whole kernel form for a prolonged period of time, namely 1 to 2
15 weeks, months or more. Storage may be in elevators, bins, bags, etc. An
important aspect of the invention is that the storage is for the purpose of
substantially retaining the grain in its initial as-stored condition, without
significant change or contamination by microorganism attack.
'Dried" defines that the grain, either sun dried or heat
2o dried, has had its initial moisture content of at least about 30% by weight
decreased to about 15% or lower, normally about ?%.
'TTon-toxic" defines the concentration of the polyene and
substances used therewith in accordance with the invention for effective
biological protection of the grain. Non-toxic does not include
z5 unacceptable quantities of either toxic chemicals from the polyene or
mycotoxins from fungi infestation.
' The polyene (e.g.,natamycin), is useful at quantities of only
about 5g through at least about 50g per ton, at which quantities it is
biologically effective in controlling fungi attack or infestation while being
3o non-toxic in food products (e.g.,animal feed), which are to be ingested by
animals. and/or humans. Concentrations of natamycin of about 5.5 ppm
through at least about 55 ppm based on the weight of the dried grain to
be treated are non-toxic and biologically effective, for protecting the grain
for 2 months or longer against significant fungal infestation and/or
3s mycotoxin contamination. However, the exact dosage which is sufficient
to be effective against the fungi is dependent upon the specific storage

y ~ Q '~ PCTPUS92/05?92
- 'u~ 93>(DI?20
conditions. If the storage conditions are favorable for the metabolic
activities of the fungi, a relatively large amount of the polyene will be
required. Storage conditions which are warm, moist, possesses a neutral
pH, contain oxygen, include a metabolizable substrate, etc., would require
a relatively large dosage of the polyene to be effective against the
attacking fungi. The amount of the polyene which is necessary to prevent
growth and/or possible toxin contamination by the fungi is less than the
amount which is necessary to treat an existing fungal outbreak.
Therefore, it is advantageous to treat the whole kernel grain immediately
to after drying.
Moreover, the fungi tend to attack any imperfection in the
whole kernel grain which permits the fungi to penetrate into the internal
regions of the kernel (e.g., the interior of the kernel contains starches and
sugars which may be consumed by the fungi). For example, the kernel
may be damaged during drying, transport, etc., in a manner that renders
the kernel susceptible to attack by a fungi. Particularly, the dried whole
kernel rnay contain or develop a crack in the hull which is sufficient to
permit entry of the fungi. Also, the eye of the kernel is especially
susceptible to damage and consequently attack by fungi even though the
2~ hull may not be cracked. Should the fungal attack of stored grain be
extensive it may be necessary to dispose of the entire contents of a
storage vessel (e.g., the presence of fungi and toxins thereof may render
all of the kernels of grain in an elevator unsuitable for any purpose).
The preferred morphology of the polyene is crystalline;
however, any morphological state is acceptable in practice of the
invention which is effective against the fungi. The polyene used in the
' invention may be present in one or more hydrate forms (e.g., mono-, and
tri-hydrates). The tri-hydrate form is advantageous in some aspects of the
invention due to its stability.
Natamycin is an acceptable polyene for practicing the
present invention which per se is essentially insoluble in water. Certain
non-toxic biologically equivalent derivatives of natamycin may be water
soluble. hlatamycin and/or a water-soluble biologically equivalent
derivative can be supplied to the grain in any convenient way which
provides the desired polyene to the dried whole kernels in a manner
su~cient to be biologically effective against the fungi. For example, the

~ 1 ~ 410 2 . Pt.'flUS92/0~'1W2
WO 93101720
-6-
polyene(s) can be applied (e.g.,sprayed, admixed, coated, etc.), onto the
grain as an aerosol, a fog, mist, powder, aqueous suspension, solution, etc.
Faccessive wetting of the dried grain is to be avoided (e.g., moisture
enhances the growth rate of the attacking fungi). Normally the polyene is
supplied while the grain is being delivered or transported to the storage
facility, such as when it is being conveyed into an elevator, bin, bag, etc.
Care must be taken to achieve a polyene application that is distributed
(e.g., uniformly), and remains throughout the grain during storage.
In one aspect of the invention, the polyene is suspended
to within a nons~toxic carrier liquid and sprayed upon the dried whole kernel
grain. Should a non-toxic carrier liquid be used to apply the polyene, the
carrier liquid should generally not be a solvent for the polyene. However,
certain biologically . effective and/or pharmaceutically acceptable
derivatives of the'polyene which may be soluble within the non-toxic
carrier liquid may be used alone and/or in conjunction with natamycin to
practice the invention. Suitable non-toxic carrier liquids comprise at least
one member of the following group: alcohols such as methanol, water,
etc. In addition to the non-toxic carrier liquid, it may be advantageous to
include a non-toxic wetting agent or surfactant in the suspension. The
2o non-toxic wetting agent tends to enhance the effectiveness of the polyene
by permitting the suspension to more readily coat and/or penetrate into
any imperfections of the dried whole kernel grain.
In another aspect of the invention, the polyene may be
comminuted or ground into a powder to increase its surface area. The
?s increased surface area may enhance the effectiveness and ability of the
polyene to be distributed uniformly throughout the dried whole kernel
grain (e.g., relatively small particles of ratamycin may be readily directly
admixed with whole kernel grain for storage).
It was a surprising discovery that if the grain is stored in a
3o generally dark and dry environment, the length of protected storage is
relatively independent of the treatment concentration. For example, if an
amount of natamycin is applied to the whole kernel grain that will give
adequate antifungal protection to the grain stored in a dark and dry
environment for about 2 months, it normally is not necessary to increase
35 the amount of natamycin to be used even for significantly longer storage
times (e.g., from harvest to harvest). For example, it would be expected

PCT/U~92/05792
e~~ 9/01720 ~ y . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:
-1-
that a suspension comprising natamycin, a non-toxic carrier liguid and a
wetting agent which is sprayed onto grain, that is to be stored in a dark
and dry environment for at least about 2 weeks, is effective to reduce if
not prevent any fungal attack. This, of course, is premised on the
natamycin being chemically stable under the conditions of storage.
In certain aspects of the invention, it may be advantageous
to use the polyene in conjunction with other treatment processes and/or
substances. For example; the polyene suspension discussed above may
include other substances such that a plurality of dried grain treatments
may be implemented simultaneously. More importantly, the polyene
treatment of the invention does not preclude using the treated whole
kernel grain in any subsequent process or end product (e.g., whole.
kernels of grain treated in accordance with the invention may be removed
from storage and processed subsequently into flakes, grist, etc.).
~'Jhile not wishing to be bound by any theory or
explanation, it is believed that the polyene is active or effective against
the fungi, but not against bacteria. One explanation may be that fungi
(but not bacteria) contain ergosterol in their membranes.
In general ~ the fungi will grow; if the environment is
2o appropriate, until contacting the natamycin. The theorized mechanism of
the polyene action is a binding of the polyene molecule and ergosterol
present in the cell membrane of the fungi, mold, yeast, etc. The
complexing with ergosterol is substantiated by the neutralizing effects of
ergosterol addition on the antifungal activities of the polyene against the
25 fungi. A complex between the polyene and the cell membrane of the
fungi is believed to alter membrane permeability since the polyene is a
' relatively large molecule which creates an increased surface pressure
which may tend to induce a reorientation of the ergosterol present in the
membrane, thus altering permeability of the cell and resulting in osmotic
3o shock. This osmotic shock is typically sufficient to interrupt, if not
halt,
the metabolic activities of the fungi (e.g., the polyene may cause irregular
fungi growth, sporulation, etc.).
A significant aspect of this invention is that very small
amounts of a polyene such as natamycin are effective in preventing the
35 excessive contamination of the whole kernel grain by mycotoxins during
storage. This is of particular importance where the grain is to be used in

dV~ X3/01730 P~1'1US92/057~k:~
~~~4~0~
_8_
food products, particularly in human food products such as cereal, where
the polyene compound must be compatible with consumption by the
human and/or animal. The polyenes used in accordance with the
invention are non-toxic to humans and animals. tienerally any poiyene
which is consumed by an animal (e.g., cattle, poultry, swine, etc.) is
normally not retained within the flesh of the animal. As a result, the
polyene does not adversely affect human consumption of any animal
which has consumed a feed containing the polyene. In contrast, animals
which are exposed to the fungi may incorporate the fungi and/or toxins
to thereof into their flesh. Such fungi and/or toxins may be harmful to
humans which consume the flesh of these animals; making it desirable to
use the invention as one technique to prevent and/or control any
significant exposure of these animals to fungi (e.g.,. the polyene treatment
' of whole kernel grain which may be eventually ground for animal feed
may prevent and/or control the exposure of animals and/or humans to
fungi). 'Therefore, one. aspect of the invention permits controlling and/or
preventing fungal attack to whole kernel grain which may be fed to
animals such that any processed animal is not contaminated with fungi,
toxins thereof and/or antifungal agents.
Although a few aspects and embodiments of the invention
have been described in detail, those skilled in the art will readily
appreciate that the present invention embraces many combinations,
equivalents and variations other than those exemplified.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2114102 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: Reversal of expired status 2012-12-02
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2012-07-10
Letter Sent 2011-07-11
Inactive: Late MF processed 2010-07-08
Letter Sent 2009-07-10
Inactive: Office letter 2008-07-30
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2008-07-24
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2008-07-23
Inactive: Office letter 2008-07-23
Inactive: Late MF processed 2008-07-09
Inactive: Late MF processed 2008-07-09
Letter Sent 2007-07-10
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Grant by Issuance 2002-09-17
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-09-16
Pre-grant 2002-06-28
Inactive: Final fee received 2002-06-28
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-03-27
Letter Sent 2002-03-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-03-27
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-03-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-01-25
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1999-07-23
Letter Sent 1999-07-23
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1999-07-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-06-23
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-06-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-02-04

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-06-28

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CONAGRA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
BRUCE DEXTER KING
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1995-08-19 1 43
Claims 1995-08-19 2 49
Claims 1999-08-10 2 38
Description 1995-08-19 8 523
Reminder - Request for Examination 1999-03-10 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1999-07-22 1 193
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2002-03-26 1 166
Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-08-20 1 172
Notice of Insufficient fee payment (English) 2008-07-23 1 93
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2008-07-30 1 164
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2008-07-30 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-08-23 1 170
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2010-07-26 1 163
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2010-07-26 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-08-21 1 170
Correspondence 2002-06-27 1 37
Fees 2001-06-26 1 37
Fees 2002-06-27 1 37
PCT 1994-01-23 14 496
Correspondence 1999-02-22 2 34
Fees 2000-07-06 1 35
Correspondence 2008-07-22 1 29
Correspondence 2008-07-29 1 13
Fees 2008-07-08 3 95
Fees 2008-07-08 2 62
Fees 2010-07-07 1 37
Fees 2010-07-07 2 44
Fees 1996-06-03 1 90
Fees 1995-06-26 1 84
Fees 1994-01-23 1 51