Language selection

Search

Patent 2122647 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2122647
(54) English Title: SPRAY MORTAR
(54) French Title: MORTIER PULVERISABLE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C04B 28/02 (2006.01)
  • C04B 14/38 (2006.01)
  • C04B 30/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MORI, WAINER (Switzerland)
  • SCHERER, JOSEF (Switzerland)
  • WOLFSEHER, ROLAND (Switzerland)
(73) Owners :
  • WAINER MORI
  • JOSEF SCHERER
  • ROLAND WOLFSEHER
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1994-05-02
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-11-05
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 43 14 612.0 (Germany) 1993-05-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


- 8 -
Abstract
A sprayable mortar for repairing reinforced concrete comprises cement and aggregate
with an average modulus of elasticity of 15,000 to 40,000 N/mm2. Especially goodresults are obtained when the aggregate comprises sand and small proportions of
limestone dust, micro rock dust or micro rock dust fibres. The protective layers obtained
are notable for their good flexibility.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
The embodiments of the invention in which an improved property or privilege is claimed
are defined as follows:
1. A mortar composition for the repair of concrete surfaces, which comprises
cement and aggregate, the aggregate having an overall average static modulus of
elasticity of from 15,000-40,000 N/mm2
2. A mortar composition according to claim 1, wherein the aggregate is a
combination of sand and natural mineral material having a fibrous structure.
3. A mortar composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the natural
mineral material is selected from at least one of limestone dust, micro rock dust
and micro rock dust fibres.
4. A mortar composition according to claim 3, wherein the natural mineral material
comprises from 0.5 to 2.5% by weight of the total weight of the dry mortar
composition.
5. A mortar composition according to claim 2, wherein the sand has an average
modulus of elasticity of 20,000-30,000 N/mm2 and a maximum particle size of
4mm.
6. A process of repairing a concrete surface, comprising the spraying thereon of a
mortar composition according to claim 1.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the spraying is carried out by the dry
spraying process.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 1 - Case 1~7~0240
2~226~7
SPRAY MORTAR
~e invention relates to a sprayable repair mort~Lr compos~on and more par~cularly to
such a composition for use on re~nforoed concrete.
When reinforced concrete is to be repaired, a layer of repa~r mortar, ~pically 30-35mm
~ick, is applied ~ereto, generally by spraying. nle repair mortar should be able to
wi~stand dimer~onal changes in the subsh~te without sulfering damage for a reasonable
period of ~me. A measure of this abili~7 is provided ~y ~e cha~acteris~c crack leng~h.
of the mortar. When a pnsm of the mortar composfflon is su'c~ected to a defle~on te$
using a cen~e point loading apparatus, the prism deflects with increasing load and on
the reverse face of the p~ism from tne loaded face ~ere is fo~ned a re~ion of
microcracks wnich region is characteris~c o~ the par~cular cornposition under test.
Eventual~y ~ese cracks u~ll join to form a major crack and the prism will fail. The
characteris~c aack leng~ may 'oe calculated from a knowledge of the fracture ener~y of
the composition (the area under the characteristic bell shaped curve of shess against
deflechon obtained from the abovementioned deflec~on test), ~e elas~ci~ modulus (E-
modulus) of the composition, and ~e ul~mate centric tens~le streng~ of ~e composiffon.
The greater the cha~aderistic crack leng~, the better perforrrLng the material. The best
materrals have high fracture energy as well as lon~ cnaracteristic crack ]ength."
It has now been fow~d that it is poss~ble to prepare a repair mortar composition w.th
outstanding proper~es as ev~denced by a long characteris~c crack length. The inven~on
therefore provides a mortar composi~on for the repair of concrete surfaces, which
comprises cement and aggregate, the aggregabe having an overall average static modulus
of elastici~y of from 15,00040,000 N/mrn2 `
The sta~c elasticity modulus (usually known as the 'l~-rnoduh~ of the aggrega~e to be
used in the composi~ons of this invention is unusual~ "soft", the hgure for ~e aggregate
in a convenffonal spray mortar being of ~e order of 25,000 to over 60,000 ~/nun2

- 2 - Case 15~0240
~:L226l~7
The E-modulus is commonly measured by means of an ultrasonic testing appa~us; a
~pical exarnple of suoh an apparatus ~s the Steir~mp Type BP 5 ulhasonic test~ (ex
Dr.-In~. G. Steinkamp, Brernen Ge~marly). The E-modulus is the aYerage E-moduhls of
the aggregate; it is pennissible to have an aggregat~ component with an E-modulus in
excess of the upper limit of 40,000 ~ lm2, provided ~at the aggregate comprises
sufflcient a~regate of a lower E-modulus to bring the average within the ~n~e
mentioned hereinabove.
Depending on the field of application, all known types of cement may be used in the
usual quantiffes, Portland cernent being prefe~red.
The "soft" E-modulus ran~e of the a~gregate may be attained by the choice of aggregate
employed and by its use in conjunction w~th nab~al mine~l matenals having a ffbrous
s~ucture. l~e aggregate used is preferably sand in wh~ch the propor~on of sand ha~ng
a high E-modulus is sIr~. In practice, sand ~pes ha~nng a grain size of 4 m~ mæimum
are selected. The sand mi~ture employed should preferab~1 have an average rnodulus of
elas~c~ty of 20,000-30,000 N/m~n2 and in partia~ar should be below 25,000 N/mrn2.
TypicaL~ s~table nat~l fibrous mine~al materlals are lirnestone dust (which rnay be
coarse~ined)"nicro rock dust, micro rock dust fibres or similar ~ibrous matenals. Such
materlals are pre~erably preænt in the compositions of the invention in amounts of 0.
to 2.5% by weight of the total weight of the dry mortar composition.
.. ~ ....
20 The mortar composition of this invention îs prefeTably applied to a subshate by spr~ying,
preferably by the ~y spraying process.
Uthen sprayed as a repair rnortar on to a subsbrate, ~2e mork~ compos~on according
to the inven~on hardens to give a layer with a high f~achlre energy and long
cha~cteristic c~ck length, and ~is manife,ts itself ~n high flexibility, high frost resistance
25 and a low mod~ of elasticity. In cont~st to conventional products which produce
hardened protective layers ui~ a moduh~s of e~astic~ of over 30,000 N/mm2, the
compositions according to the invention may be used to ob~in protective layers v~h a

- 3 - Case 15~0240
212 2 6 ~ I
modulus of elasticity of bolow 25,000 I~/rnm2. Thus, the composi~ons accordin~ to the
invention may be employed whenever it is desired to produce a malleable top layer which
is insensitive towards cracks. The improved ducfflity and the low modulus of elas~city of
the mortar compositions allovJs the reduction and even cornplete elirnination of shrinka~e
reinforcernent. Thus, layers need not be so thick and single-layer application may often
be ernployed.
It has been found that the combination of the fibrous rnatenals ~rnestone dust and rnicro
rock dust fibres with sand as hereinabove desaibed and cernent gives particularly good
results, outstandin~ in the case of the crack test hereinabove described. Especially good
combinations are those in which the weight percentages of limestone dust and micro
rock dust fibres are 1.5 and 0.8-1.5 respec~v~y. If no o~er components are present,
the sand comprises from 77-78% and cement comprises the remainder. 1~ other
components are desued, some adjustmen~; to the Qnd and cement quanffties are
necessary, but such are well within the sl~ll of ~e art.
Other components suitable for use in sprayable mo~ar compositions according to the
invenffon are weD known to the art. These cons~tuents may be added in the usual
proport~ons, depending on the field of use. For example, it is possible to add sllica ~e
or tly ash as a ~qller, or known fibre reinforcement. All cor~uents are rr~xed in ~e dry
state by knowni processes, and fed pneurna~calliy to the spray nozz~e of any dry spraying
machine (e.g. MEYCO Piccola, MEYCO Unica ex Meynadier AG., Winterthur,
Switzerland), where they are n~xed with water and sp~yed. The quantity of water may
~ary depending on condiffons, but may readily be determ~ned in any situation by the
sl~lled worker. Typical water/binder weight ra'dos (where binder naturally includes such
mate~ials as siliica fume or fly ash, where these are present) for a dry spraying operation
are from 0.3-0.6, preferably from 0.4-0.~. An acceleRItor Is norrnally not used. The
application depth may ~ary ~m 12 to 100 mm.
The invention is ~e~ described wi~ reference to tne following non-limi~ng examples
in whii~i all parts are by weight.

- 4 - Case 15~0240
212~6~7
Example 1
Cons~tueni:s modulus of density propor~ons
elas~a~,7 N/mrn2 k~m3 % by wei~ht
cement 18,000 (17,00~21,000) 2000-21~0 20.0
sands 24,000(23,000-83,000) 267~3050 77.7
limestone dust 24,000 2500 1.5
m~cro rock dust 17,000 (crosswise) 2500 0.8
bres 170,000 (leng~wise)
. .
sprayable mortar 22,137 2131 100 -
.
10 The various cons~tuents are mixed in the dry state and water s added at the sp~ay nozle
fn such a rate as to give a ra~o of water/binding agent of 0.4. ~is ra~o is used in ~e
subsequent examples. : ~
.'~ ' ~","'-:

6 '1 7 c~ 15~02~0
amples 2 to 12
Further ex~mples of appropria~e spr~yable morrar rnixes are giv2n in the table, where
~he proportions of the various constituen~; are given in percen~ages by wei~h~ In the
table, "MSM" is n~3cro rock dust, '~SM PF' is rnicro rock d~t ~bres and '~S~' i~5 limestone dust . The limestone dust is coar~ grain (4 mm) materiaL
~ .:
Table
,_ _ _ __ l
Example cernent sandsKSrM MSM ¦ MSM PF ~
_ _ , , .
2 20 77.71.5 0.8
_ _~
3 20 75.5 3 1.~ l : :`
_ ~
~ 20 72 5 3 l
.. . . _ 11 .. ,
~5 74.5 10 0.5 l
6 - 15 75 10 = _ ` ~ ~`
7 . 20 77.7 l.5 1 0.8
8 20 77 2.5 1 0.5 ~ ~
g 20 69.2 10 1 0.8 ~`
77 1.5 1 1.5 ~::
11 20 --~ 77
. _ :
12 20 77 3---- : ~

:`
- 6 - Ca~7e 1540240
~2~7
~ .
The composd$iorLF7 of Examples 1 and 10 are subjected to tes~ng according to the test
me~od RllEM 50-r~lC draft recornrnendation. A cornmercial~available repair mortar
comprising by weigh$ 42% cement, 33% sand (0.1~1.20rnm)7 17% sand (1.2
2.38mrn), 3.4% silica ~ume, 3.3% caldurn o~de, and the remainder mLscellaneous minor
quantiffe~ of adrnixb~res LS subjected to the sal,ne tes~ng procedure. From the tes~ng7 the
charact~ristic crack leng~ are determlned. ~e resul~ are as follow~7: ~ '
Example 1 435nun
Example lû 382mm ",~ '
Cornrnerclal cornposi~on 262mm ~, ' ,
:
::
The crack performances of the composiffons according to the invenffon are conslderably
superior to ~at of ~e commercially~available composi~on.
The composl~ons are sprayed on to a concrete substrate. In subseque~ flexibilits~ testing,
the compositiorls according to ~e invention prove to be superior to the comrnercial
composition in terms of fle70bi~ and durabi~ity. ~ ~
~, ' ',

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2122647 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1997-05-02
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1997-05-02
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1996-05-02
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1996-05-02
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-11-05

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1996-05-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
WAINER MORI
JOSEF SCHERER
ROLAND WOLFSEHER
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1994-11-05 1 35
Cover Page 1994-11-05 1 72
Drawings 1994-11-05 1 9
Claims 1994-11-05 1 41
Descriptions 1994-11-05 6 332