Language selection

Search

Patent 2123980 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2123980
(54) English Title: MULTILAYERED GLASS LAMINATE HAVING ENHANCED RESISTANCE TO PENETRATION BY HIGH VELOCITY PROJECTILES
(54) French Title: LAMINE DE VERRE MULTICOUCHE AYANT UNE RESISTANCE ACCRUE A LA PENETRATION PAR DES PROJECTILES A GRANDE VITESSE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B32B 17/10 (2006.01)
  • B32B 27/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SMITH, CHARLES ANTHONY (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BENNETT JONES LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1991-11-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-06-10
Examination requested: 1998-10-09
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1991/008751
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1993010973
(85) National Entry: 1994-05-19

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

2123980 9310973 PCTABS00022
A multilayered glass laminate having enhanced resistance to
spalling and penetration by high velocity projectiles consists of at
least three plies of glass (10, 12, 14) with layers of plasticized
polyvinyl butyral (16, 18, 20) therebetween and having
permanently bonded to an outer layer of one of said plies of glass (14) a
thin composite consisting of an adhesive energy absorbing layer
(22) and a dimensionally stable polyester film (24).


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


PCT/US91/08751
Claims
1. A multilayered glass laminate having enhanced resistance to
spalling and penetration by high velocity projectiles consisting of from three
to seven plies of glass, each ply having a thickness from 3.175 to 635 mm, with
layers of plasticized polyvinyl butyral resin therebetween, said laminate
having permanently bonded to an outer layer of one of said plies of glass a
thin composite consisting of an adhesive, energy absorbing layer and a
dimensionally stable, chemical resistant polyester film, said composite having
a thickness not greater than about 2 mm, said polyester film having a
thickness of from about 0.762 to 0.381mm and said adhesive layer having a
thickness from about 0.381 to 1,524 mm.
2. The laminate of Claim 1 wherein said adhesive layer is
plasticized polyvinyl butyral.
3. The laminate of Claim 2 wherein said polyester film is
coated with an abrasion resistant coating.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO g3~10973 PCI`/US91/087~1
~".............. ^~
2123980
" ,TI, rLE
MULIILAYERED GLASS LAMINATE HA~ING
ENHANCED RESISTANCE TO PENETR~TION
- BY HIGH VELOCITY PROJECIILES
BACKGROUN~ OF THE INVE~mQN
This invention relates to glass laminates having enhanced ~:
resistance to penetration by high velocity projectiles. More particularly, the
0 invention relates to relatively thîn glass laminates which not only stop glass ~; -
from spalling whe~ impacted by small alld medium caliber bullets but also
stops penetration of the laminates by the bullets.or other small high velocity
projectiles.
Various ~pes of transparent laminated structures have been
disclosed for protecting personnel from ilying splinters and fragments of
gla~g materials which are rele~sed when a high velocity projectile strilces tbe
structure. In U.S. 3,658,636 thick plates of an amorphous polyamide are
formed into a sandwich structure with silicate glass. U.S. 2,861,021 describes -
a strucblre in which polymethyl methacrylate sheets are l~ated with
2 o polyvinyl bu~ral aIld faced with a layer of a polyamide, polyester or
regenerated cellulose sheet. Multiple plies of glass and poly~nnyl butyral are
used in combination vnth a plastic iIlterlayer as an impact absolption section
in the structure disclosed in U.S. 4,130,684.
The problem of spalling of an anti-abrasion layer which is
s applied to a laminate using polycarbonate sheets is addressed in
U.S. 4,812,359 by applying a thin polyca~bonate sheet having an
abrasion-resistant self-healing coating. A similar laminate which includes an
in~ernal elastic e~pansion core with a thin polycarbonate sheet c~vered with
an antiabrasive which can be replaced is disclosed in U.S. 4,879,183. British
3 0 Patent 828,381 discloses a five layer laminate consis~ng of two layers of glass,
two layers of polyvinyl butyrate and a central layer of polyethylene
terephthalate. Published UK Application 2 lS6 736A discloses an impact
resistant laminate comprising a number of glass sheets which are laminated
together with a rear polycarbonate sheet which is said to be resistant to
spalli~g.

WO 93/10973 PCT/US91/087~;1
2~23~ 2
A problem with most "bullet resistant" structures is that they
have a thichless in excess of that which can be accommodated in usual
glazing applications. Some structures are effective in controlling spalling but
are not effective in stopping penetration of the laminate by a projectile. Most
of the structures rely on incorporating layers of various materials in the
larninated structure. This complicates manufacture and increases costs since
different materials require different laminating techniques. -~
It has been found that by permanently bonding a very thin
composite consisting of an adhesive layer and a dimensionally stable polyester
0 film to multiple plies of glass with layers of plasticized polyvinyl butyral there
between, a glass laminate of substantially reduced thickness is provided which
is capable of resisting penetration of high velocity projectiles with little, if any, s
spalling from the inner rear face of the laminate.
SUMM~RY OF THE I~VE~TION
This invention provides a laminated glazing to which is attached
a permanent, energy absorbing thin plastic composite consisting of an
adhesive energy absorbing layer, such as polyvinyl butyral, and a strong,
dimensionally stable, chemical and abrasion resistant layer, sucb as a layer of
polyester film which may be coated with a polysiloxane or other abrasion
resistant coating. The thin plastic composite prevents spalling from the
surface of the glazing to which it has been laminated. Surprisingly, in additionto stopping glass from spalling, the composite increases the integrity and
penetration resistance of the constructions to which it is laminated when they
2 5 are impacted by bullets or other projectiles striking the opposite sur~ace. By
retaining the surface glass and holding the construction together, and by other
mechanisms not fully understood, penetration resistance is substantially
enhanced far beyond what would be expected of such a thin composite
structure.
3 o In accordance with this invention a multilayered glass laminate
consisting of at least three plies of glass is prepared by interposing layers ofplasticized polyvinyl butyral between the plies of glass. The plies of glass each
should have a thickness from about 1/8 to aboutl/4 inch (3.175 to 6.35 mm)
and the polyvinyl butyral layer should have a thickness from about 15 to about
3 5 60 mils (0.381 to 1.524 mm). A thin composite consisting of an adhesive layer

34 Rec'd PCT/PTG ~14Y 93
3 212-398~CT~lJS 9 1 / 0 8 7 5 1 -
of poly~inyl bu~rral having a thickness ~rom 15 to 60 mils (0381 to 1524 mm)
and a polyester film having a thiekness from about 3 ~o about 15 mils (0.0762 ~:
to 0381 mm) is permanently bonded to an outer l~yer of the glass. The total
thickness of the composite is not greater than about 2 mnL Anti-spalling and
s penetratioD resistant s~ructures having an overall reduc~on in thickness of
20% or morc as compared to known glass laminatcs uscd in bullct rcsistant
glazing applications a-c provided by this invcntion. Preferably, threc to seven
plies of glass adhercd together with adbesivc layers of polyvi~l butyral are
used. it is to bhe understood that the rclative ~hick~ness auld nu mb~er of plies of
lO glass of the structurcs of this invention will be dctcrmi~ed by fhe ~thrcat
levcl~,i.c. the size ~d velocity of projec~es w hicb are e~qpected to bhe -
encountered.
The polyvinyl butyral adhesive sheeting may bc sclcctcd from
thc many commercially available grades of plasticized polyvinyl bu~ral. a
particularly desirable product of thc type disclosed in Moynihan, US Patent
4,292,372 is sold by E. I. Du Pont dc Ncmours and Company undcr the
trademark Butacite. Other known adhesive material for glass laminates
such as polyurethane may also be used. The polyester film may be of the type
disclosed in Knox, US Patent 4,072,779, and may be coated witb an abrasion
2 o resistant material as disclosed in that patent. The glass may bc sclected in
accordancewith ASI'M specifications, Designation C 1172-91. Tbe glass may
bc tempcred or anncaled. Tempered glass is gencrally prefcrrcd.
Brief Descripdon of the Drawings
-FIGS. 1 and 2 are sections through the edgc of a projcctile
rcsistant laminatc according to the invendon.
Detailed Description
Refcrring to FIG. 1, a projectile resistant lan~iDate comprises
thrcc sheets l0, 12, and 14 of glass. Glass sheet 10 is positioned in a dircction
likely to receive an impact from a projectile, e.g. a bullet, on its Iace 11.
Shccts 10, 12, and 14 are bonded togethcr by interlayers of poly~inyl butyral
whicb arc from 15 to 60 mils (0.381 to 1.528 mm) thick. A polyetbylene
tercphthalatc film 24 from 3 to 15 mils (0.0762 to 0.381 mm) thick is bonded
3s to glass sheet 14 by an interlayer of polyvinyl butyral.
5UBST~T~TE SH~T

WO 93/10973 PCI'/US91/08751
~ 398' t':.~ 4~ -
FIG. 2 shows the laminate of FIG. 1 having an abrasion
resistant coating 26 adhered to the outer surface of polyethylene
terephthalate film 24. Coating 26 may be a silanol coating from 1 to 20
~ucrons thick of the type disclosed in US Pat. 4,469,743 and US Pat.
4,177,315.
The laminated structure of this invention may be prepared by
known laminating methods. Polyvinyl butyral ~llm is interleaved between
glass sheets 10, 12 and 14. ~A composite comprised of polyethylene
terephthalate film 24 and polyvinyl butyral film 22 is then positioned over the
rear face of glass sheet 14~ A coverplate is placed over the assembly, the
assembly is edge taped and placed in an airtight bag and subjected to a ~ ~-
vacuum. The evacuated assembly is then autoclaved while the bag is
maintained under reduced pressure.
The invention will be further illustrated by the following
e~amples.
EXAMPLES
Laminated glass test panels were prepared by sandwiching
polyvinyl butyral sheeting having a thickness of 30 mils (0.762 mm) between
2 o one foot (304.8 rnm)squares of nominal 100 mil (2.54 mm) thick glass .
Selected panels included a composite bonded to an outer layer of one of the
plies of Bass consisting of a layer of a Butacite~ polyvinyl butyral sheet having
a thickness of 15 mils (0.381 mm) ~nd a polyester film having a thickness of ~-
0.007 inch ~0.178 m). A Single shot from a .38 caliber handgun was fired at
the center of each panel from a distance of 15 feet (4.572 m). Spall was -
measured as grams of glass ejecting from the backside of the laminate. Spall
designated "+ + + " was not measured but was estimated to be in the range
from about 50 to 100 grams, designated "+ +" in the range from 10 to 15
grams, and "+" less than about 0.2 grams. The results of the tests are set out
3 o in the following table.
, ~ ....

WO 93/10973 PCI'/US91/08751 . ~
".~
!': i
; 1 21 2 3 9 8 0
TABLE 1
, STANDARD GLASS COMPOSITE GLASS LAI~INATE
I,AMINATE
. ._ . . ............ .. _
NO. OF THIC~CNESSPE~NEI RATE SPALLTHIC~ESS PENETRATE SPALL
PLIE~S (mm~__ - ~(l~.m2 (mm) _ . (~ml
4 11.94 YES85.1 12 45NO 0.0
~_ . -. _
4 12 95NO 0.0
~ _ _ ._
4__ 12.45NO 0.0
4 12.45YES + + +
~ ... .
15.24 NO 10.3_15.75_ NO 0.0
15.24 NO + +15.49 _ NO 0.0
15.24 YES + + + 15.49 NO 0.0
_ NO 15.is NO 0.0
Y~S +~+
._ _
_ 6 18.3 NO 13.7
6 18_ NO + + _
7 21.34 NO _ 9.5
7 21.34 NO 0.0_
7 21.84 NO + +
8_ 24.38 NO 0.29 27.94 NO +9_ 27.94 NO +
Results similar to those obtained with 4 plies of glass plus a
5 composite as shown above are obtained using 3 plies of glass plus a composite
having a total thickness of about 12.5 mm.
In TaUe 2 the data from Table 1 is condensed and reformated
to show a percentage of penetration versus sample construction,thickness and
the ratio of penetrations to the number of samples tested for each ~pe.
10 Focusing on the samples each with 4 plies of glass, the standard laminate waspenetrated, whereas the sample having the same number of plies plus the
composite shield is only penetrated 2S% of the time. In tests where the
composite was not penetrated, no spall was generated. This improvement
resulted from the addition of a polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl
butyral adhesive film of only 22 mils (Q559 mm) thick as compared to a glass
laminate thickness of about O.S inch (12.7 mm) (an increase of 6.4~S in
thickness). The same pattern can be seen for the samples each containing 5
plies of glass, where the number of data sets is greater. In this case, the ;

WO 93/10973 Pcr/vssl/o87~1
2~,398 ' ''
addition of the composite reduces the penetration frequen~y from 40% to O~G
with an increase of only 3.3% in thickness. It is obvious when comparing 5
plies of Standard Glass Laminate that more protection is af~orded when 4
plies of the same thiclmess of glass is used in the Composite Glass Laminate
5 of the present iIIvention. Even increasing the laminate thickness to 0.6 inch
(15.24 mm), (5 plies of laminated glass) only reduced the actual penetration
to 40% (a 27.7% increase in thiclcness).To obtain 0% penetration unth the
standard construction, 6 plies of glass were necessa~y.
TABLE 2
STANDARD GL~SS COMPOSITE GL~SS L~MINATE
I~MINATE
No.~ TH~cNss . R~no sP~ THKNSS P~N~ RAno SPALL
PLIBS (mm) TR~TE . .__ ~m) (mm)_ TRAlE (~m)
_ 4 11.94 100% 1/1 85.1 12.7 25% 1/4 0.0
. L_ _._ . .. _. .
15.24 40% _2l5 10.3 15.62 ~% 0/4 0 0 -
6 18;3 O~Yo 0/2 ~ 13.7
7- 21.59 O~o 0/3 9 5 -
. .. _ , . . _
8 24.38 0%_ 0/1 0.2
- 9~ 27.94 oo~o-- 0/1 +
11 35.56 0% 0/1 0.0

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2005-07-27
Inactive: Dead - Final fee not paid 2005-07-27
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-11-29
Deemed Abandoned - Conditions for Grant Determined Not Compliant 2004-07-27
Letter Sent 2004-01-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-27
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-01-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-12-17
Letter Sent 2001-11-16
Extension of Time for Taking Action Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-11-16
Extension of Time for Taking Action Request Received 2001-10-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-06-18
Inactive: Office letter 1999-02-26
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-10-23
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1998-10-23
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-10-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-10-09
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-10-09
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-06-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-11-29
2004-07-27

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-09-25

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1997-11-27 1997-09-03
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 1998-11-27 1998-09-18
Request for examination - standard 1998-10-09
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 1999-11-29 1999-09-22
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2000-11-27 2000-09-11
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2001-11-27 2001-09-28
Extension of time 2001-10-18
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - standard 11 2002-11-27 2002-09-30
MF (application, 12th anniv.) - standard 12 2003-11-27 2003-09-25
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
CHARLES ANTHONY SMITH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1995-08-20 1 51
Cover Page 1995-08-20 1 26
Drawings 1995-08-20 1 25
Description 1998-11-17 6 287
Claims 1998-11-17 1 25
Representative drawing 2000-04-04 1 7
Claims 1995-08-20 1 34
Description 1995-08-20 6 350
Representative drawing 2004-01-15 1 11
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-07-28 1 129
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-10-23 1 172
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-01-27 1 161
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (NOA) 2004-10-05 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2005-01-24 1 175
PCT 1994-05-19 12 460
Correspondence 1998-12-08 32 1,385
Correspondence 1999-02-26 2 12
Correspondence 2001-10-18 4 109
Correspondence 2001-11-16 1 16
Correspondence 2004-04-30 46 2,876
Correspondence 2004-06-16 1 19
Correspondence 2004-07-14 1 28
Fees 1996-09-05 1 87
Fees 1995-09-20 1 82
Fees 1994-09-06 1 84
Fees 1994-05-19 1 57