Language selection

Search

Patent 2127469 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2127469
(54) English Title: ARCHITECTURAL PANEL SYSTEM FOR GEODESIC-LIKE STRUCTURES
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE PANNEAUX ARCHITECTURAUX POUR STRUCTURES DE TYPE GEODESIQUE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04B 7/00 (2006.01)
  • E01F 8/00 (2006.01)
  • E04B 1/82 (2006.01)
  • E04B 1/84 (2006.01)
  • E04B 1/86 (2006.01)
  • E04B 7/10 (2006.01)
  • E04B 9/02 (2006.01)
  • E04B 9/34 (2006.01)
  • E04C 2/32 (2006.01)
  • E04C 3/04 (2006.01)
  • E04F 13/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KOTTER, RODMAN W. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • QUILITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • QUILITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2001-09-04
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1993-01-06
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-07-22
Examination requested: 1999-11-24
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1993/000122
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1993014277
(85) National Entry: 1994-07-05

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/817,155 (United States of America) 1992-01-06

Abstracts

English Abstract


An architectural panel system for assembling geodesic-like structures in which
three or more corrugated panels
(66, 68) of relatively thin material are joined along their sides (12, 18) to
form a polyhedral angle. The corrugations (20)
may be formed in the panel surface (72, 74) or along side flanges (76, 78)
provided for attaching adjoining panels together,
or both. Corrugations (80, 82) in the side flanges serve to interlock
adjoining panels together directly or through use of
interlocking channel members (24, 26). Surface corrugations (60) in triangular
and pentagonal panels for spherical domes
are formed perpendicular to the edges of the panels (54) and converge along
load distribution grooves formed in the panel
surfaces from the corners of the panels to their centers. Corrugations in the
panel surface (72, 74) and along the side
flanges (76, 78) are intercorrugated relative to one another for more strength
and stiffness. The panels are preferably
formed using polycarbonate plastic material.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-37-
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An architectural panel system comprising at
least three panels, each of said panels having a panel
surface bounded along at least two edges thereof by side
flanges formed integrally with said panels, each of said
side flanges having a flange surface extending away from
said panel surface substantially perpendicularly thereto,
and means for fastening each of said side flanges to the
side flange of at least one other panel such that said
at least three panels converge in a vertex to form a
polyhedral angle, each of said flange surfaces having
corrugations formed therein directed substantially
perpendicular to the edge of the panel surface that
engage complementary corrugations formed in a flange
surface of an adjoining panel.
2. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 1, wherein each of said panel surfaces has
corrugations formed therein over at least portion of the
panel surface.
3. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 2, wherein each of said panel surfaces has
corrugations formed therein over substantially all of
the panel surface.
4. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 2, wherein the corrugations a.n each of said panel

-38-
surfaces are intercorrugated with the corrugations
formed in said flange surfaces.
5. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 2, wherein each of said panels has a polygonal
configuration.
6. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 2, wherein each of said panels has a curvilinear
panel surface.
7. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 2, wherein said panels form at least a portion of
a substantially spherical geodesic-like dome.
8. An architectural panel system comprising at
least three panels having corrugations formed in the
surface thereof, said corrugations directed substantially
perpendicularly to the edges of the panel surfaces, and
each of the panels bounded along at least two edges by
side flanges formed integrally therewith, each of the
side flanges having surfaces extending away from said
panel surface substantially perpendicular thereto, and
means for fastsening each of the side flanges to a side
flange of at least one other panel such that said at
least three panels converge in a vertex to form a
polyhedral angle, and each of the flange surfaces having
corrugations formed therein directed substantially
perpendicular to the edge of the panel surface that

-39-
interlock with complementary corrugations formed in a
flange surface of an adjoining panel.
9. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 8, wherein the panel surfaces have a substantially
polygonal shape.
10. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 9, wherein the panel surfaces have a substantially
triangular shape.
11. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 9, wherein the panel surfaces have a substantially
pentagonal shape.
12. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 9, wherein the corrugations in each panel surface
converge along lines from the corners of the panel to its
center.
13. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 12, wherein the panel surfaces are divided into as
many segments ass the panel has sides by grooves formed in
each panel surface along the lines of convergence of the
corrugations from the corners of the panel to its
center, and further wherein the corrugations terminate
substantially at the grooves.

-40-
14. An architectural panel system comprising at
least three substantially parallelogram shaped panels
having corrugations formed in the surface thereof, said
corrugations directed diagonally to the edges of the
panel surfaces, each of the panels bounded along at
least two edges thereof by side flanges formed integrally
with said panels, each of the side flanges having a
surface extending away from said panel surface
substantially perpendicularly thereto, and means for
fastening each of the side flanges to a side flange of at
least one other panel such that said panels form a
polyhedral angle, and each of the flange surfaces having
corrugations formed therein substantially perpendicular
to the edge of the panel surface that interlock with
corrugations formed in a flange surface of an adjoining
panel.
15. An architectural panel system comprising:
at least three panels, each of said panels
having a panel surface bounded along at least two edges
by side flanges formed integrally therewith, each of said
side flanges having a flange surface extending away from
said panel surface substantially perpendicularly thereto,
each of said flange surfaces having corrugations formed
therein substantially perpendicular to the edges of the
panel surface that nestingly mate with a flange surface
of at least one adjoining panel such that said panels
converge in a vertex to form a polyhedral angle; and

-41-
means for fastening said mated flanges, said
fastening means including an interlocking member for
joining said panels together at the vertex of the
polyhedral angle formed by the panels, said interlocking
member having a leg for interlocking each adjoining pair
of flange surfaces.
16. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 15, wherein the interlocking member comprises a
plurality of channels radiating from a centerpoint in
which adjoining side flanges are held together at the
vertex.
17. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 15, wherein each pair of adjoining flange surfaces
is further held together along substantially its entire
length by an interlocking member.
18. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 17, wherein adjacent interlocking members are
joined together.
19. An architectural panel system as defined in
claim 17, wherein said interlocking members comprise
channels in which adjoining flange surfaces are held.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


21 274 fig
ARCHITECTURAL PANEL SYSTEM FOR
GEODESIC-LIKE STRUCTURES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This application is related to U.S. Patent
No. 4,958,476 filed May 19, 1989.
The present invention concerns architectural
structures, and more particularly, relates to an
architectural panel system for forming covers or
shelters in the nature of geodesic-like structures. Such
structures are used for various purposes, including
radomes, storage facilities, housing and public
buildings.
Geode:;ic-like structures are well known. An
example of one is described in U.S. Patent No. 2,682,235
to R. Buckminsi~er Fuller. It has long been desired in
building such structures and frames to obtain maximum
strength and space with a minimum of materials. It has
been a further .goal t:o simplify the structures as much as
possible for easier and less costly construction.
The object of the present invention is to
provide an architectural panel system for constructing
geodesic-like structures of various shapes and sizes that
achieve a higher strength with a simpler and less costly
construction than heretofore known.
_... __.._~~.~w=....~... _. _ _... _W.__.._..~.~..~_._.. ..
__._..._..~.,_."~_~._..___..._ ._.. _. _._.____~.__.___..

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122 ~ t
~1~7 4Ei9 2
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Boiefly, and in general tenas, the present
invention provides an architectural panel system that is
ideally suited to the assembly of geodesic-like structures
with corrugated panels of relatively thin material that
are inexpensive, lightweight and easy to assemble in a
variety of shapes and sizes for diverse uses, yet exhibit
a high resistance to pressure-loading forces such as
caused by wand or snow.
More specifically, the present invention resides
in an architectural panel system in which three or more
corrugated panels are joined along their sides to form a
polyhedral angle. This basic structure can serve as a
cover itself , or it can be used as a unit for a larger
geodesic-lit";e structure made up of any number of similar
units formed of panels joined together in like manner
along their edges to each other and to other units.
Numeroua different spherical and non-spherical
geodesic-li)';e structures can be assembled from
appropriate7~y shaped panels with this architectural panel
system. TIZe shapes of the corrugated panels may be
triangular, rectangular, pentagonal or other regular or
irregular polygonal configurations. The panel surfaces
themselves may be flat or curvilinear.
Tree corrugations on individual panels may be
formed in the panel surface or along side flanges provided
for attaching adjoining panels together, or both. Surface
corrugations may extend only partially or substantially
all the way across the panel surface, depending on the
requirement: of the particular structure, to increase the

'r'~" 93/14277 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ PCT/US93/00122
3
surface stiffness of the panel and its resistance to
pressure loading. Complementary corrugations formed in
the side flanges of adjoining panels may nest and serve to
interlock the panels together with appropriate fastening
means to provide added strength and ease of assembly.
Corrugations in the panel surface may be formed
in any number o:E useful patterns. For example, in a
presently ~~referned embodiment, the corrugations in the
surfaces of triangular and pentagonal panels for a
spherical ~~eodesic-like dome are formed substantially
perpendicular to the edges of the panels to enable the
side corrug~ation:a to be formed uniformly. Because the
edges of these ~>anels follow a geodesic line along an
equator of the ~;pherical dome, the corrugations follow
paths which conva_rge as longitudinal lines to the pole
normal to that equitorial plane, such that the
corrugations themselves converge on the panel along lines
which in ei°fect divide the panel surface into as many
segments as it has sides. To eliminate unfavorable stress
concentrations where the surface corrugations converge and
distribute stresses, grooves can be formed in the panel
surfaces along those lines of convergence from the corners
of the panel to its center. Surface corrugations in
parallelogram-shaped panels, on the other hand, can be
formed diagonally across the face of the panel without
creating undesirable non-uniformities in the side
corrugations. In addition, corrugations in the panel
surface and along the side flanges advantageously may be
intercorrugated relative to one another for more strength
and stiffne:~s.
The side' flanges of the architectural panels may
be fastened together directly with rivets, screws,
adhesive bonding or in any other suitable manner, or by

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122
~1~~ g~69
4
use of separate interlocking members for greater
mechanical integrity and weatherproofing. For example,
the interlocking members may take the form of channels
into which the nested corrugations of adjoining side
flanges are received and fastened. A multi-legged channel
may be provided to fasten and reinforce the corner
junctions of the side flanges of the panels at the vertex
of the polyhedral angle, with a separate channel radiating
from a centerpoint to receive each pair of adjoined side
flanges. A single-legged channel may be provided to
fasten and reinforce each pair of side flanges along
substantially their entire length between vertices. In a
further refinement, the single-legged channels may be
joined at one or both ends to the multi-legged channels at
the vertices of the polyhedral angles for yet greater
mechanical integrity. The channels can serve to seal the
junctions between adjoining panels and possibly carry off
any water that penetrates the junctions.
The corrugated construction and strong,
interlocking junctions of the panels enable use of very
thin-wall panels, which are preferably formed using
polycarbonate plastic material. The resulting geodesic-
like structures are inexpensive, lightweight, easy to
construct, weatherproof, and exhibit high strength against
pressure loading forces, and are ideal as radomes, covers
for storage tanks, and a wide variety of shelters.
The novel features which are believed to be
characteristic of the present invention, together with
further objectives and advantages thereof, will be better
understood from the following detailed description
considered in connection with the accompanying drawings,
wherein like numbers designate like elements. It should
be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are

V~ 93/14277 ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/00122
for purposes of illustration and description only and are
not intended as a definition of the limits of the
invention.
5

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122 -
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings illustrate, by way of
example, presently preferred embodiments of the invention,
in which:
FIG. la is a side elevation of one embodiment of
a geodesic-like structure formed by corrugated
architectural panels having a pentagonal shape in
accordance with the present invention;
FIG. lb is a plan view of one panel from the
structure in FIG. la;
FIG. lc is a side view of the panel in FIG. lb;
FIG. id is a partial cross-sectional view of the
panel taken along the line A-A in FIG. lb;
FIG. le is a partial cross-sectional view of the
panel taken along the line B-B in FIG. lb;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of another
embodiment of a corrugated pentagonal panel suitable for
use in the geodesic-like structure in FIG. la;
FIG. 3a is a perspective view of one embodiment
of a multi-legged, trefoil interlocking channel member in
accordance with the invention;
FIG. 3b is a perspective view of one embodiment
of a single-legged interlocking channel member;
FIG. 3c is a partial perspective view of two

W" 93/14277 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/00122
7
nested corrugated side flanges of adjoining panels mounted
in a portion of an interlocking channel member;
F'IG. ~~ is a perspective view of another
embodiment of an architectural panel having a triangular
shape suii:able for assembly into a geodesic-like
structure;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of yet another
embodiment of a corrugated panel having a rectangular
shape suitable for assembly into a geodesic-like
structure;
FIG. 6a. is a plan view of a triangularly-shaped
corrugated panel similar to the panel of FIG. 4 suitable
for assembly into a geodesic-like structure;
FIG. 6b is a front elevational view of the panel
in FIG. 6a;
FIG. 6c is a side elevational view of the panel
in FIG. 6a;
F:IG. 6d. shows the edge detail of the panel in
FIGS. 6a - 5c;
F:CG. 6e is a partial cross-sectional view of the
panel taken along the line A-A in FIG. 6a;
F:CG. 7a. is an illustration of an icosahedral
geodesic-lilce dome formed by an assembly of twenty
equilateral triangular panels; and
FIG. 7b is an illustration of a larger, eighty
section polyhedral dome in which each icosahedral

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122
8
triangular section in FIG. 7a has been further divided
into four triangular sections.

CA 02127469 2000-10-06
WO 93/14277 ~PCT/US93/00122
9
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to the drawings, and particularly
FIGS. la - le thereof, there is shown an illustrative
truncated spherical antenna cover or radome 10 formed by
the joinder of eleven identical architectural panels 12,
giving the structure a dodecahedral form, in which the
bottom five panels have been trimmed for mounting to a
foundation (not shown). The surface 14 of each panel 12
has a generally pentagonal shape and is bounded along its
edges by side flanges 16 that are formed perpendicular to
the panel surface. The intersection of any three panels
12 in a vertex 18 may be considered to form a polyhedral
angle, although in this particular embodiment the panels
have a generally curvilinear rather than a flat surface.
The radius of curvature of the panels 12 is the same as
that of the dome 10. The curvilinear shape of the panels
12 helps to stiffen their surfaces.
The surfaces 14 of the panels 12 have
corrugations 20 to increase the strength and stiffness of
the panels. In FIGS. la - lc, the surface corrugations 20
extend only a small way into the panel surfaces 14 from
their edges, leaving the remainder of the panel surfaces
smooth. The side flanges 16 also have corrugations 22~ to
facilitate manual assembly of the panels 12 and add
strength to the cover 10. As seen in FIG. la, the
corrugations 22 in each side flange 16 nest with the
corrugations in an adjoining side flange to form strong,
interlocking junctions. The panels 12 use the innovative
intercorrugation structure disclosed in my co-pending US
Patent 5,077,949, of January 7, 1992. That is,
corrugations 20 in the panel surface 14 are intercorrugated
with the corrugations 22 of the side

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122
l0
flanges 16. (See FIGS. ld and le.) These
intercorrugations add to the mechanical strength and
function of the cover 10. The panels can be made of any
suitable material, including metal, although for most
applications it is presently preferred to make them of a
polycarbonate plastic material by vacuum forming
techniques.
A structure such as cover 10 is assembled by
simply mating the side flanges 16 of adjoining panels 12
and fastening them together by any suitable means, such as
rivets, screws or adhesive bonding. Alternatively, T-
shaped interlocking channel members in both multi-legged
and single-legged .configurations 24 and 26 shown in FIGS.
3a and 3b, respectively, are provided into which the mated
side flanges 16 may be received and fastened.
The multi-legged channel member 24 is formed as
a trefoil in which each of three channels 28, 30 and 32
radiate from a common center point at the same angles and
with the same curvature as the intersecting panels 12
which form the polyhedral angle. Of course, it will be
appreciated that in the case of structures employing more
than three panels to form a polyhedral angle, additional
legs in the appropriate configuration can be added as
needed . The free end of each channel 2 8 , 3 0 and 3 2 has
holes 34 formed laterally through its sidewalls 36 to
receive a rivet or screw to hold the mated side flanges 16
near the vertex 18 and reinforce the corner junction of
the panels 12. The bottom walls 38 of the channels 28, 30
and 32 extend laterally beyond the sidewalls 36 for added
strength.
The single-legged channel member 26 is a simple,
elongated channel with holes 40 through its sidewall 42

~ 93/14277
PCT/US93/00122
11
for rivets or screws spaced along its length and a bottom
wall 44 that :Likewise extends laterally for added
strength. :It may be used to secure the mated side flanges
16 of adjoining ;panels 12 together between vertices 18.
As shown in FIG. 3b, the single-legged channel member 26
similarly is curved to complement the curvature of the
adjoining side flanges 16.
Alternating ends 46 and 48 of the multi-legged
and single-:Legged channel members 24 and 26, respectively,
are flared ~to receive unflared ends 50 and 52 of adjacent
channel members. In this way, all of the channel members
in the cover 10 may be joined together by the same rivets
or screws h~~lding mated side flanges 16 in place. These
channel members 24 and 26, when joined to the side flanges
16 and to each other, form a stiff, monocogue structure.
In addition to joining the side flanges 16
together, tree interlocking channel members 24 and 26 serve
to weatherproof junctions between adjoining panels 12. In
this regard,, it c,an be noted that the bottom edges of the
mated side i:lange;s 16 can abut the bottom walls 38 and 44
of the channels 24 and 26, respectively, or alternatively
the channel~~ can be formed sufficiently deep that adequate
free space remains between the bottom edges of the side
flanges and the bottom walls of the channels to serve as
ducts to carry off' any water that penetrates the junctions
between ad=joining panels 12. As with the panels
themselves, the channel members 24 and 26 can be formed of
any suitable material including metal or plastic.
Turning to FIG. 2, there is shown another
possible form of a pentagonal architectural panel 54
having a curvilinear surface that is suitable for the
geodesic-lilt:e dome 10 of FIG. la, in which substantially

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122
~.'~'~ 46 9
12
the entire surface 56 and the side flanges 58 of the panel
are corrugated. The surface corrugations 60 are formed
substantially perpendicular to the edges of the panel 54.
This enables the side corrugations 62 to be formed in a
uniform size and pattern along the side flanges 58.
By referring back to FIG. la, it will be
appreciated that each of the edges of these panels 54
follows a geodesic line along an equator of the dome 10.
Therefore, the surface corrugations 60 follow paths which
converge as longitudinal lines to the pole that
corresponds to that equitorial plane. Hence, the
corrugations 60 themselves converge on the panel 54 along
lines which extend from the corners of the panels to their
centers. It has been determined that if the surface
corrugations 60 were permitted to meet, unfavorable stress
concentrations and possible buckling of the panel 54 could
occur under load of pressure forces from wind or snow or
the like. To alleviate this potential problem, load
distribution grooves 64 are formed in the panel surface 56
along these lines of convergence as a stiffening junction
between the converging surface corrugations 60.
FIGS. 4 and 6a - 6e show equilateral triangular-
shaped panels 66 and 68, respectively, which may be used
to form an icosahedral geodesic dome 70, as illustrated in
FIG. 7a. The geodesic dome 70 of FIG. 7a has a spherical
shape formed by joining twenty such triangularly-shaped
panels. The panels 66 and 68 have corrugations both in
their surfaces 72 and 74, as well as in their side flanges
76 and 78, respectively. The corrugations 80 and 82 in
the side flanges 76 and 78, respectively, are
intercorrugated with the corrugations 84 and 86 formed in
the panel surfaces 72 and 74, respectively, and nest with
corrugations in side flanges of adjacent panels. As with

V~"" 93/14277 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/00122
13
the pentagonally-shaped panel 12 of FIGS. la - le, the
side flange:a 76 and 78 of these triangular panels 66 and
68 can be fastened directly together or through use of
interlocking channel members similar to those shown in
FIGS. 3a - :3c.
L:lke the pentagonally-shaped panels of FIGS. la
- le and 2, the edges of the triangular panels 66 and 68
shown in FIGS. 4 and 6a - 6e follow geodesic lines. See
FIG. 7a. Likewise, the surface corrugations 84 and 86 are
formed perpe:ndicu:lar to the edges of the panels 66 and 68
such that they follow longitudinal paths and converge
along lines extending from the corners of the panels to
their centers. Load distribution grooves 88 and 90,
respectivel~~, shown in cross-section in FIG. 6e, are
formed along these convergence lines to avoid stress
concentrations and better distribute stresses in the
panels under load ~.
In the ease of antenna covers, very thin radome
walls are essential to low loss, broad band, microwave
transmission,. An 80-inch radome with a peak-to-valley
surface cor~.-ugati~on depth of 0.625 inches was designed
with the panels of FIG. 6a - 6e having a nominal material
thickness of 0.020 inches made from LEXAN brand
polycarbonate plastic by General Electric Company. By
critical selection of an included angle O of 60 degress
for the load distribution groove 90 (FIG. 6b) and an
included angle O of 90 degrees for the surface
corrugations 86 (:EIG. 6d), analyses show that the panel
should withstand a pressure equal to a wind of 150 mph
without tackling with a safety factor of four to five.
For radome applications, it will be appreciated
that it is desirable to utilize very thin panels and

WO 93/14277 PCT/US93/00122
14
maintain all corrugations and load distribution grooves
shallow to minimize insertion losses and avoid inhibiting
radiation propagation. Although different design
considerations may control in other applications, such as
storage facilities, the architectural panel system of the
present invention is still advantageous in permitting use
of light, thin and inexpensive panels that are easy to
assemble into the desired structure.
If the radius of a structure becomes very large,
the equilateral triangular sections of an icosahedral type
dome may be too large to handle conveniently, compared to
smaller sections of an equally large polyhedral dome
having, for example, eighty sections. As indicated in
FIG. 7b, the eighty sectioned polyhedral dome 92 would be
formed by dividing each icosahedral triangular section
into four triangular sections. This would be done by
connecting the mid points of each leg of a triangular
icosahedral section (A, B, C) in FIG. 7a with a geodesic
line. Thus, there are formed three identical isosceles
triangular sections and one equilateral triangular
section. Each new triangular section has approximately
one fourth the area of the original icosahedral section
and about the same area as the icosahedral section of a
spherical dome with half the radius. This process of
dividing panels of a polyhedral geodesic form is described
in the works of R. Buckminister Fuller as increasing the
frequency of a polyhedral form.
Repeating the process on panel sections of very
large polyhedral domes, therefore, is a logical procedure
to maintain convenient dimensions for its panel sections.
Thus, geodesic dome, thin-wall panels, with manageable
dimensions can be designed regardless of the overall dome
dimensions. Moreover, the general corrugation pattern in

Vu~' 93/14277
PCT/US93/00122
triangular panel sections used in the higher frequency
polyhedral domes will follow the geometric and structural
principles illustrated by the panels shown in FIGS. 4 and
6a - 6d.
5
FIG. 5 shows a parallelogram type of panel 94
that is rectangular in shape with corrugations 96 in the
panel surface 98 and side flanges 100 with corrugations
102 for interlocking adjacent panels. Unlike the
10 triangular and pentagonal panel shapes, however, the
surface corrugations 96 on this rectangularly-shaped panel
94 can be formed diagonally relative to the edges of the
panel withoist creating distortions or non-uniformities in
the corrugations 102 of the side flanges 100. Panel 94
15 has the advantage of being easier and less expensive to
manufacture by 'virtue of its uninterrupted diagonal
surface corrugations.
I1. will be understood, of course, that
modifications of t:he present invention will be apparent to
others skil7.ed in the art. Consequently, the scope of the
present invention should not be limited by the particular
embodiments described above, but should be defined only by
the claims :yet forth below and equivalents thereof.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2012-01-06
Letter Sent 2011-01-06
Inactive: Late MF processed 2009-02-10
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2009-02-10
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2009-02-10
Letter Sent 2009-01-06
Inactive: Late MF processed 2007-04-30
Letter Sent 2007-01-08
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Late MF processed 2006-01-19
Letter Sent 2006-01-06
Inactive: Late MF processed 2005-01-20
Letter Sent 2005-01-06
Inactive: Late MF processed 2004-01-22
Letter Sent 2004-01-06
Grant by Issuance 2001-09-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-09-03
Letter Sent 2001-06-21
Inactive: Final fee received 2001-05-23
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2001-05-23
Pre-grant 2001-05-23
Inactive: Single transfer 2001-05-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-11-24
Letter Sent 2000-11-24
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-11-24
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2000-11-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-10-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-04-10
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-02-08
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2000-01-11
Letter Sent 2000-01-11
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2000-01-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-11-24
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-11-24
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1993-07-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-12-29

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 1998-01-06 1998-01-05
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 1999-01-06 1999-01-05
Request for examination - small 1999-11-24
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2000-01-06 2000-01-05
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2001-01-08 2000-12-29
Registration of a document 2001-05-23
Final fee - small 2001-05-23
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - small 2002-01-07 2002-01-07
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - small 2003-01-06 2002-12-31
Reversal of deemed expiry 2009-01-06 2004-01-22
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - small 2004-01-06 2004-01-22
Reversal of deemed expiry 2009-01-06 2005-01-20
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - small 2005-01-06 2005-01-20
Reversal of deemed expiry 2009-01-06 2006-01-19
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - small 2006-01-06 2006-01-19
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - small 2007-01-08 2007-04-30
Reversal of deemed expiry 2009-01-06 2007-04-30
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - small 2008-01-07 2007-12-18
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - small 2009-01-06 2009-02-10
Reversal of deemed expiry 2009-01-06 2009-02-10
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - small 2010-01-06 2010-01-06
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
QUILITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
RODMAN W. KOTTER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1995-08-05 1 37
Claims 1995-08-05 4 214
Abstract 1995-08-05 1 97
Drawings 1995-08-05 6 315
Description 1995-08-05 15 900
Description 2000-01-24 15 542
Claims 2000-01-24 5 170
Cover Page 2001-08-21 1 54
Description 2000-10-06 15 544
Representative drawing 2001-08-21 1 23
Representative drawing 1998-07-23 1 20
Reminder - Request for Examination 1999-09-08 1 127
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2000-01-11 1 180
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2000-11-24 1 165
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-06-21 1 112
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-03-02 1 175
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2004-03-17 1 166
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2004-03-17 1 166
Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-02-15 1 173
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2005-02-15 1 166
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2005-02-15 1 166
Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-02-03 1 172
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2006-02-03 1 165
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2006-02-03 1 165
Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-02-19 1 172
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2007-05-23 1 166
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2007-05-23 1 166
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-02-17 1 171
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2009-03-02 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-02-17 1 171
Fees 1998-01-05 1 35
PCT 1994-07-05 14 598
Correspondence 2001-05-23 2 72
Fees 1999-01-05 1 27
Fees 2000-01-05 1 24
Fees 2009-02-10 2 87
Correspondence 2009-02-10 2 86
Fees 2010-01-06 1 35
Fees 1997-01-06 1 34
Fees 1996-01-03 1 38
Fees 1995-01-03 1 23