Language selection

Search

Patent 2134264 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2134264
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF MOLYBDENUM-99 AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTE THEREFROM
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR LA PRODUCTION DE MOLYBDENE-99 ET GESTION DES DECHETS QUI EN CONTIENNENT
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22B 34/34 (2006.01)
  • C22B 3/06 (2006.01)
  • G21G 1/02 (2006.01)
  • G21G 1/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HANCOX, WILLIAM T. (Canada)
  • LABRIE, JEAN-PIERRE (Canada)
  • HARRISON, RICHARD J. (Canada)
  • SINGH, DEONARAINE (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2000-09-12
(22) Filed Date: 1994-10-25
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-10-13
Examination requested: 1998-04-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A process is taught for production of Mo-99 from uranium-235 and for managing waste produced therefrom. The process includes separation of the Mo-99 from irradiated uranium and solidification of the waste remaining after such separation. Because of the great reduction in the amounts of waste produced fromthe process over previous methods, the process is of particular use in the large- scale production of Mo-99. Further, the present process results in a reduced process time over previous processes and thereby offers a reduction in the loss of Mo-99 by decay.


French Abstract

Il est proposé un procédé de production de Mo-99 à partir d'uranium-235 et de gestion des déchets qui en résultent. Ledit procédé consiste à séparer le Mo-99 de l'uranium irradié et à solidifier les déchets résultant de cette séparation. En raison de la forte réduction de la quantité de déchets produite par ce procédé par rapport aux procédés antérieurs, ce procédé est particulièrement utile dans la production de Mo-99 à grande échelle. En outre, le présent procédé entraîne un temps de traitement réduit par rapport aux procédés antérieurs et entraîne donc une réduction de la perte de Mo-99 par désintégration.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for producing Mo-99 comprising: irradiating a target containing
aluminum-free uranium or uranium oxide whereby to create an admixture of
uranium oxide or uranium and Mo-99, dissolving said admixture in a nitric acid
solution, separating the Mo-99 from the nitric acid solution, evaporating the
solution and calcining the residue to form solid uranium oxide.
2. The process as defined in claim 1, wherein the Mo-99 is separated from the
nitric acid solution by adsorption on an alumina column.
3. The process as defined in claim 1, wherein the calcining comprises heating
at
400 - 650°C in the presence of oxygen.
4. The process as defined in claim 1, wherein the calcining comprises heating
at
400 - 500°C in the presence of oxygen.
5. The process as defined in claim 1 further comprising providing time for
decay
of radioactive isotopes from the nitric acid solution prior to the evaporation
of
the nitric acid solution.
6. The process as defined in clam 1, wherein the target comprises a first
outer
wall member and a second outer wall member having a layer of the uranium
disposed therebetween, such that heat produced by fission of the uranium is
transferred directly to the first and the second outer wall members.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~13~~64
PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF MOLYBDENUM-99 AND
MANAGEMENT OF WASTE THEREFROM
Field of the Invention
This invention is directed to the production of molybdenum-99 and, in
particular a process for production of molybdenum-99.
Background of the Invention
Molybdenum-99 (Mo-99) is the parent nucleus to technetium-99m (Tc-
99m). Tc-99m is used in nuclear medicine for liver, kidney, lung, blood pool,
thyroid
and tumour scanning. Tc-99m decays to a stable isotope, technetium-99,
emitting
a low energy gamma ray which can be detected outside the body and used to
reconstruct the image of an organ. Tc-99m is preferred over many other radio
isotopes for nuclear medicine because of its short half-life of approximately
6 hours
which results in reduced radiation exposure of organs relative to the exposure
given
by most other imaging radio isotopes.
Because of its short half-life Tc-99m must be produced just prior to
administration. Tc-99m can be produced from its parent nucleus Mo-99 which has
a half-life of approximately 66 hours. Mo-99 is produced by nuclear fission of
uranium-235 (U-235). Production techniques for Mo-99 have been developed which
yield a suitable product for use in nuclear medicine. However, current
production
techniques are complex and time consuming and result in considerable decay
losses. In addition, current production techniques create large quantities of
high
level radioactive liquid waste, thus increasing production costs and reducing
the
suitability of such processes for large scale commercial production of Mo-99.
A
process for production of Mo-99 is required which reduces the amount of waste
produced.

2134264
-2-
A target for use in Mo-99 production having high heat transfer will allow
irradiation at high fluxes so that a high rate of fission is obtained. Targets
having
high heat transfer have been proposed incorporating uranium embedded in an
aluminum matrix typically containing 79% by weight of aluminum and 21 % by
weight
of uranium. However, the use of aluminum in the target presents serious
disadvantages in the production of Mo-99. The need to dissolve the aluminum
matrix in order to obtain the uranium requires a considerable period of time,
adding
several hours to the production process. During this time, the radioactive
materials
are decaying and therefore final product is being lost. Moreover, the presence
of
dissolved aluminum in the solution complicates the separation steps and
renders it
difficult to obtain pure products. Mercury is required as a catalyst in the
process to
remove aluminum. Mercury is of course toxic, and thereby adds to process
hazard.
The relatively high volume of solution needed for dissolution of the large
mass of
aluminum results in corresponding large volumes of radioactive waste solution.
This
is difficult and expensive to store, and cannot easily be disposed of in a
safe way.
Other targets are known consisting of closed cylinders in which
uranium oxide or metal is electroplated about the inner surface. The cylinder
is
made from stainless steel or zirconium alloy (zircaloy) and allows for a
direct
exposure of the irradiated uranium for processing. However, such targets are
useful
only in low power reactors since heat transfer is a problem at higher powers.
Summary of the Invention
A process has been invented for production of Mo-99 from uranium
which is suitable for large-scale operation and provides a means for waste
management.
In accordance with a broad aspect of the present invention, there is
provided a process for producing Mo-99 comprising: irradiating a target
containing
aluminum-free uranium or uranium oxide, extracting the irradiated uranium or

2.134264
-3-
uranium oxide by dissolution in a nitric acid solution, separating the Mo-99
from the
nitric acid solution, evaporating the solution and calcining to form solid
uranium
oxide.
Brief Description of the Drawings
A further, detailed, description of the invention, briefly described above,
will follow by reference to the following drawings of specific embodiments of
the
invention, which depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are
therefore
not to be considered limiting of its scope. In the drawings:
Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of a process according to the present
invention; and,
Figure 2 shows a perspective, cutaway view of a target useable in the
inventive process; and,
Figure 3 shows a perspective, cutaway view of another target useable in the
inventive process.
Detailed Description of the Present Invention
The process of the present invention comprises a process for
producing Mo-99 which comprises irradiating a target containing substantially
aluminum-free uranium or uranium oxide containing a portion of U-235,
dissolving
the uranium or uranium oxide in a nitric acid solution and separating the Mo-
99 from
the nitric acid solution. The waste remaining after the separation is managed
by
evaporating the solution and calcining to form solid uranium oxide.
Referring to Figure 1, a flow diagram of a preferred process for
production of Mo-99 and management of the waste produced therefrom is shown.

2134264
-4-
Steps 1 to 4 pertain to the irradiation of uranium oxide and recovery of Mo-
99.
Steps 5 to 8 pertain to a process for management of a waste stream after Mo-99
recovery.
Mo-99 is produced by placement of a target containing uranium-235
into the irradiation zone of a nuclear reactor, particle generator or neutron
particle
source. The target can be any suitable target containing uranium or uranium
oxide
which is substantially free of aluminum, or alternatively, a target as
described herein.
After a suitable period of irradiation, such as up to about 21 days, the
target is
removed and cooled for a suitable period such as, for example, for 2 to 16
hours.
The target is punctured to release off gases such as Xe-133 and I-131
such gases are collected and retained for decay. However, such puncturing is
not
essential to the process, since gases can be collected during decladding.
The Mo-99 is recovered by a process comprising opening the target to
expose the uranium and dissolving the uranium or uranium oxide in nitric acid
solution. Dissolution requires at least stoichiometric equivalents of nitric
acid for
each gram of uranium-235 irradiated. However, this may be increased depending
on the form of uranium or uranium oxide used. For example, 5 to 40 ml of 2 to
16
N nitric acid are required to dissolve each gram of U-235, depending on the
form of U-
235, with powder forms of uranium oxide requiring the least amount of nitric
acid.
Where it is necessary to submerge the target, amounts greater than this may be
required. To reduce the amount of waste produced the volume of acid used
should
be as little as conveniently possible to provide dissolution. Immersion in the
acid is
maintained until the layer is dissolved. The time for dissolution is not
rritir~l ~~a
should be optimized on a cost benefit analysis in terms of amount dissolved
versus
time spent. Gases released during exposure of the uranium or uranium oxide
layer
and dissolution thereof are collected for off gas treatment.
After the uranium or uranium oxide has dissolved, the target is

2134264
-5-
removed from the acid solution and is managed as low level waste. Mo-99 is
recovered from the acid solution by contacting with an adsorbent. In an
embodiment, the acid solution is passed at least once through an alumina
column.
The alumina column useful in the preferred method is prepared by dissolving
aluminum oxide in 1 N nitric acid to form a slurry. A column packed with 150
ml to
250 ml of wet aluminum oxide is sufficient to absorb 100 to 2000 six day Ci of
Mo-
99. The alumina column containing adsorbed Mo-99 is passed to treatment for
removal of Mo-99.
After recovery of Mo-99, waste acid solution remains which contains
uranium nitrite. Such waste is passed to a process wherein it is converted to
solid
uranium oxide. In a preferred embodiment, the waste acid solution is allowed
time for
decay of short half-life radioisotopes. However, this step is not essential to
the
process and the waste can move directly to a process including de-watering,
such
as for example, by boiling, and heating to about 500°C in the presence
of oxygen
to allow oxidation and calcination.
In one embodiment, waste solution is passed to an evaporation cell,
wherein it is boiled to remove the water, and then to a calciner where it is
further
heated to about 500°C in the presence until solid uranium oxide and
calx thereof is
formed. Alternately, the waste solution is passed directly to a calciner where
the steps of evaporation and calcination are combined.
Any suitable calciner can be used such as an in-pot calciner where
temperatures will be increased from 400°C to 650°C, or a rotary
calciner where
calcination can be affected at temperatures of 400°C to 500°C.
Waste in the form
of stable, ceramic-like uranium oxide calx is obtained by the process and is
suitable
for long term storage in sealed canisters.
A target, having high heat transfer, which is useful in the present
invention comprises a first wall member and a second wall member which
sandwich
n

2134264
-6-
a layer of uranium or uranium oxide therebetween. The layer can be in the form
of
uranium oxides such as, U02 or 0308, in powder form, uranium metal foil,
uranium
metal foil oxidized to U02 or electrodeposited U02 or U308. In a preferred
embodiment, the uranium or uranium oxide is highly enriched. The outer wall
members are in contact with the uranium or uranium oxide layer such that the
target
has effective heat transfer during fission.
Referring to Figure 2 there is shown a view of a target 10 useful in the
present invention, cutaway to reveal its inner contents. Target 10 comprises a
first
wall member 12, a second wall member 14 and a layer of uranium 16
therebetween.
Wall members 12 and 14.are rolled to be in intimate contact with layer 16 to
provide
for effective heat transfer and to stabilize the uranium within the target.
Edges 17
of wall members 12 and 14 are then sealed such as by welding.
Referring to Figure 3 there is shown a view of another target 110 useful
in the present invention. Target 110 comprises an inner wall member 112, an
outer
wall member 114 and a layer of uranium oxide 116 therebetween. End caps 118
are provided to seal a gap formed between the wall members 112, 114 during
loading of the uranium oxide.
Wall members are produced from any suitable material for use in
nuclear reactor environments, such as, for example zirconium alloy. Stainless
steel
can be used but is not preferred because of its high neutron absorption when
compared to zirconium alloy. To provide close contact between the uranium or
uranium oxide layer and the wall members and, thereby, effective heat transfer
during
fission, the members are preferably compressed about the layer, such as by
rolling
or swaging. In an alternate embodiment, the uranium or uranium oxide is in
close
contact with at least one member and the target is helium filled to provide
for heat
transfer. However, it is to be noted that helium filling provides good heat
transfer
across small gaps, such as less than about 1 mm. Heat transfer by means of
helium filling is diminished substantially as the space between the wall
members of

2134264
_7_
the target is increased. The outer wall members are adapted to facilitate
exposure
and dissolution of the layer after irradiation. For example, where uranium
foil is
used, the zirconium alloy surfaces are anodized prior to application of the
foil to
facilitate removal of the foil after irradiation.
The uranium or uranium oxide is loaded between the wall members in
a thin layer and in an amount to give the desired power level such as for
example
about 100 mg/cm2 and, thereby, the desired Mo-99 production. In a preferred
embodiment, an annular target, generally as shown in Figure 3, is 470 mm in
length
having an inner diameter of 13 mm and an outer diameter of 15 mm and has
loaded
therein about 20 g of uranium oxide.
In an embodiment, uranium oxide in the form of a finely divided powder
is vibration packed into an annular gap formed between the wall members. In an
another embodiment, a film of uranium oxide is electrodeposited onto the wall
members. In still another embodiment, uranium metal or oxidized uranium metal
is
disposed between the wall members.
To produce a target having a packed powder layer of uranium oxide,
the wall members are positioned such that a uniform annular gap of between
about
0.10 and 0.20 mm is formed between the members. The edges of the wall
members are sealed to contain the powder, such as by insertion of end caps or
welding, and the powder is vibration packed into the gap such as, for example,
by
use of a Syntron vibrator. The outer walls are then rolled or swaged to
compress
the uranium oxide to the desired density of about 6.5 to 11 g/cm3 and to cause
the
wall members to be in intimate contact with the uranium oxide.
A target is produced using electrodeposition by first washing one or
both wall members in preparation for electrodeposition of the uranium oxide.
The
uranium oxide is electrodeposited over the surface of the wall members such
that
it will be disposed between the wall members in the assembled target and such
that

2134264
_$_
a total amount of about 100 mg/cm2 is disposed between the walls. Such
electrodeposition is affected by any known r~iethod suitable for uranium
loading. For
example, the uranium oxide can be electrodeposited by use of a bath containing
0.042 M uranyl nitrate and 0.125 M ammonium oxalate, the pH being adjusted to
7.2
with NH40H. Uranium oxide is electrodeposited to suitable thicknesses by use
of
current of 0.9 amperes, 1.5 volts and a temperature of about 93°C. The
wall
member having the electrodeposited layer thereon is then heated to
500°C.
After electrodeposition the edges of the walls are dipped in nitric acid
to remove a portion of the uranium oxide to allow for sealing. The walls are
positioned in close relation, such that the space between the walls is
preferably less
than 0.2 mm, and sealed at the edges. The walls are then pressed such as by
rolling or swaging or, alternatively, the space between the walls is helium
filled, to
provide for good heat transfer.
A target having uranium metal or oxidized uranium metal foil therein is
prepared by placing the foil between wall members which have, preferably, been
anodized. The members are then rolled or swaged to provide intimate contact
between the metal and the walls. The edges are sealed by any suitable means
such as by welding.
The target can be of any suitable shape which will allow heat transfer
through each wall member such as, for example, a plate assembly, as shown in
Figure 2, an annular assembly, as shown in Figure 3, or other suitable shapes
that
provide for direct heat transfer from the uranium or uranium oxide through the
walls
to a heat sink or cooling fluid. As an example, some targets generally as
described
in relation to Figure 3, have been successfully irradiated at target powers of
18.2
kW/g of U-235.

2134264
_g_
Examples
Four targets, generally as shown in Figure 3, containing 18.5 g of U-
235/target in the form of highly enriched uranium oxide powder were irradiated
for
days at a target power of 60.7 kW. Similarly, sixteen pencil targets
containing
5 2.4 g of U-235/target in the form of aluminum-uranium alloy (79% AI, 21 % U)
were
irradiated for 10 days at 15.5 kW.
After irradiation, the targets were cooled and processed to recover Mo-
99. The targets containing uranium oxide were opened and treated with 2 N
nitric
acid until completely dissolved. The targets containing aluminum-uranium alloy
was
10 dissolved in 2 N nitric acid containing Hg(N03)2 until completely
dissolved. The
resulting solutions were passed though -an alumina column to recover the Mo-
99.
Liquid waste remaining after the recovery was allowed decay time
followed by evaporation and calcination. Results are shown in Table I.
Table I
Process Parameters AI-U
Target power (kW/g U-235) 6.46 3.28
Mo-99 yield from irradiation (Ci/g U-235) 229 140
Process time (hours) 28.5 21.0
Mo-99 yield from processing (Ci/g U-235) 153 101
Volume liquid waste/g U-235 (ml) 200 1 g
Volume of calcined waste/g U-235 (ml) 13 1.3
The process of the present invention is simplified over previous
processes and offers faster process time. Thus, less Mo-99 is lost due to
decay
during the process. In addition, the process provides a great reduction in the
amount of waste produced by the process over other processes and such waste is

213264
-10-
in stable form for long-term storage.
It will be apparent that many other changes may be made to the
illustrative embodiments, while falling within the scope of the invention and
it is
intended that all such changes be covered by the claims appended hereto.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2014-10-25
Maintenance Request Received 2013-10-25
Maintenance Request Received 2012-10-24
Inactive: Office letter 2009-03-12
Inactive: Office letter 2009-03-12
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-03-12
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-03-12
Letter Sent 2009-03-09
Revocation of Agent Request 2009-02-12
Inactive: Single transfer 2009-02-12
Appointment of Agent Request 2009-02-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Grant by Issuance 2000-09-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-09-11
Pre-grant 2000-06-20
Inactive: Final fee received 2000-06-20
Inactive: Final fee received 2000-06-20
Letter Sent 2000-01-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-01-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-01-27
4 2000-01-27
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2000-01-24
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2000-01-24
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 1999-12-29
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-12-29
Inactive: Office letter 1998-12-29
Inactive: Office letter 1998-12-29
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-12-29
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - paragraph 84(1)(a) of the Patent Rules 1998-06-05
Letter sent 1998-06-05
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1998-06-05
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) fee processed 1998-04-27
Letter Sent 1998-04-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-04-08
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-04-08
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 1998-04-08
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1997-10-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-10-13

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1997-10-27

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1999-08-13

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
DEONARAINE SINGH
JEAN-PIERRE LABRIE
RICHARD J. HARRISON
WILLIAM T. HANCOX
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1996-01-22 1 18
Description 1995-10-12 10 397
Abstract 1995-10-12 1 16
Claims 1995-10-12 1 29
Drawings 1995-10-12 3 24
Cover Page 2000-08-31 1 36
Representative drawing 2000-08-31 1 7
Claims 1999-12-28 1 33
Description 1999-12-28 10 421
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1997-11-23 1 186
Notice of Reinstatement 1998-04-22 1 170
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2000-01-26 1 166
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2009-03-08 1 103
Fees 2003-10-05 1 31
Correspondence 1998-12-28 1 9
Correspondence 1998-12-28 1 10
Correspondence 2000-06-19 1 28
Fees 1999-08-12 1 32
Fees 2001-08-02 1 31
Fees 1998-07-28 1 36
Fees 2002-06-26 1 32
Fees 1998-04-07 1 42
Fees 2000-10-01 1 33
Fees 2004-10-20 1 27
Fees 2005-09-15 1 28
Fees 2006-09-11 1 29
Fees 2007-10-23 1 32
Fees 2008-10-20 2 54
Correspondence 2009-02-11 3 89
Correspondence 2009-03-11 1 14
Correspondence 2009-03-11 1 17
Fees 2009-10-25 1 44
Fees 2010-10-24 1 43
Fees 2011-10-24 2 59
Fees 2012-10-23 1 44
Fees 2013-10-24 1 43
Fees 1996-10-09 1 35
Prosecution correspondence 1994-10-24 11 520
Correspondence related to formalities 1995-06-06 1 38
Correspondence related to formalities 1998-04-08 1 30
Courtesy - Office Letter 1998-05-11 1 17
Prosecution correspondence 1998-04-07 1 45
Prosecution correspondence 1999-11-11 19 957
Prosecution correspondence 1998-04-26 4 92
Correspondence related to formalities 1998-12-20 4 89
Prosecution correspondence 1999-11-11 2 51
Correspondence related to formalities 1998-11-22 2 32
Prosecution correspondence 1999-04-19 2 40
Examiner Requisition 1999-05-11 2 41
Prosecution correspondence 1999-04-19 3 97
Examiner Requisition 1999-01-20 2 52
Prosecution correspondence 1998-11-24 4 169
Prosecution correspondence 1998-07-15 3 111
Examiner Requisition 1998-08-24 2 74
Prosecution correspondence 1998-04-26 10 342
Prosecution correspondence 1998-04-26 2 39