Language selection

Search

Patent 2134462 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2134462
(54) English Title: GRAFTING OF MONOMERS ONTO POLYOLEFINS IN PRESENCE OF ORGANIC PEROXIDES
(54) French Title: GREFFAGE DE MONOMERES SUR DES POLYOLEFINES EN PRESENCE DE PEROXYDES ORGANIQUES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08F 25/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MITCHELL, DAVID JOHN (Canada)
  • KELLY, PETER YATES (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: TORYS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-11-15
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1994-04-22
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-11-10
Examination requested: 2001-04-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: 2134462/
(87) International Publication Number: CA1994000224
(85) National Entry: 1994-10-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9308669.2 (United Kingdom) 1993-04-27

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method for the grafting of a monomer onto a
polyolefin in the presence of an organic peroxide is
disclosed. The polyolefin is a polyolefin that, when
molten, undergoes cross-linking in the presence of the
organic peroxide. The method comprises: (a) admixing the
polyolefin in an extruder with 25 to 6000 ppm, based on
the weight of the polyolefin, of an organic peroxide
coated onto a carrier polymer and up to 5%, by weight of
the polyolefin, of a grafting monomer capable of being
grafted onto the polyolefin in the presence of the
organic peroxide. The admixture is heated to a
temperature above the melting point of both the
polyolefin and the carrier polymer under admixing
conditions to effect grafting of said grafting monomer
onto the polyolefin, said carrier polymer undergoing
chain scission in preference to cross-linking in the
presence of the organic peroxide at said temperature.
Grafted polyolefin is extruded from the extruder. The
method may be used to produce grafted polyolefins with
lower levels of gels and specks, especially for use in
films and adhesives.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-15-
CLAIMS:
1. A method for the grafting of a monomer onto a
polyolefin in the presence of an organic peroxide, said
polyolefin being a polyolefin that, when molten, undergoes
cross-linking in the presence of the organic peroxide, said
method comprising:
(a) admixing in an extruder an admixture of (i) said
polyolefin, (ii) 25 to 6000 ppm, based on the weight of the
polyolefin, of an organic peroxide coated onto a carrier
polymer, the amount of organic peroxide coated onto said
carrier polymer being at least 0.2% by weight of the
carrier polymer, and (iii) up to 50, by weight of the
polyolefin, of a grafting monomer capable of being grafted
onto the polyolefin in the presence of the organic
peroxide;
(b) heating the admixture to a temperature above the
melting point of both the polyolefin and the carrier
polymer under admixing conditions to effect grafting of
said grafting monomer onto the polyolefin, said carrier
polymer undergoing chain scission in preference to cross-
linking in the presence of the organic peroxide at said
temperature; and
(c) extruding grafted polyolefin from the extruder.
2. The method of Claim 1 in which the grafted polyolefin
so extruded has a lower level of gel and specks than if the
carrier polymer had been a polyolefin that does not undergo
chain scission in the presence of the organic peroxide.

-16-
3. The method of Claim 2 in which the grafted polyolefin
has a lower level of gel and specks than obtained when the
polyolefin of step (a)(i) is also used as the carrier
polymer.
4. The method of any one of Claims 1-3 in which the
melting point of the carrier polymer is higher than the
melting point of the polyolefin.
5. The method of any one of Claims 1-4 in which the
polyolefin is selected from the group consisting of
homopolymers of ethylene, copolymers of ethylene or
propylene with higher C4-C10 alpha-olefins, copolymers of
ethylene with one or more other ethylenically-unsaturated
monomers that are polar, and ionomers.
6. The method of Claim 5 in which the ethylenically-
unsaturated monomers are selected from vinyl esters of
carboxylic acids, vinyl halides and unsaturated carboxylic
acids or esters thereof.
7. The method of Claim 6 in which the polyolefin is a
copolymer of ethylene with at least one of acrylic acid,
methacrylic acid, carbon monoxide, methyl acrylate, butyl
acrylate, methyl hydrogen maleate and vinyl acetate.
8. The method of any one of Claims 1-7 in which the
carrier polymer is polypropylene, copolymers of propylene
with ethylene or other C4-C10 alpha-olefin, poly 1-butene,
copolymers of 1-butene with minor amounts of ethylene or
other C3-C10 alpha-olefin, polystyrene, or block copolymers
of styrene with a C4-C8 diene.

-17-
9. The method of any one of Claims 1-8 in which the
grafting monomer is selected from the group consisting of
ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids and
ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid anhydrides,
derivatives of such acids selected from the group
consisting of esters, acid chlorides and
amides, and mixtures thereof, and vinyl trialkoxy silanes.
10. The method of Claim 9 in which the grafting monomer is
selected from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid,
fumaric acid, itaconic acid, crotonic acid, itaconic
anhydride, maleic anhydride and substituted maleic
anhydride, nadic anhydride, nadic methyl anhydride,
tetrahydro phthalic anhydride, mono and disodium maleate,
acrylamide, maleimide, glycidyl methacrylate, diethyl
fumarate, vinyl trimethoxy silane and vinyl triethoxy
silane.
11. The method of any one of claims 1-10 in which the
amount of organic peroxide is in the range of 100-3000 ppm.
12. The method of any one of Claims 1-11 in which the
monomer is maleic anhydride and the amount is 0.1-3% by
weight of the polyolefin.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


G_~,AFTING OF MONOMERS ONTO
POLYOLEFINS IN PRESENCE OF ORGANIC PEROXIDES
The present invention relates to the grafting of
monomers onto polyolefins in the presence of organic
peroxides, in which the organic peroxide is on a carrier
polymer that, under the grafting conditions, undergoes
chain scission in preference to cross-linking in the
presence of organic peroxides.
Polymers of alpha-olefins in which the alpha-olefin
is a hydrocarbon are well known. Such polymers,
especially homopolymers of ethylene and copolymers of
ethylene with the higher C4°Clo alpha-olefins are used in
large volumes for a variety of end-uses. These polymers
are relatively non-polar, which is an important and
beneficial characteristic for many end-uses. However,
non-polar characteristics are also a disadvantage, for
instance with respect to adhesion between polar materials
and the polyolefins.
Properties of polyolefins may be modified by the
grafting of polar monomers onto the polyolefin. Melt
grafting processes are described in U.S. Patent 4 612 155
of R.A. Zelonka and C.S. Wong, which issued 1986
September 16. In particular, that patent describes a
grafting process in which polyolefin in particulate form
is fed to an extruder together with grafting agent and
organic peroxide, the latter being in the form of a
composition with a second polymer of lower melting point
and lower melt viscosity.
In melt grafting processes, it is necessary to
obtain adequate mixing of the grafting monomer and
organic peroxide in the polyolefin prior to significant
formation of radicals upon decomposition of the organic
peroxide. If the mixing is inadequate, there is a
tendency for the polyolefin and/or grafting monomer to
undergo cross-linking reactions which form localized
DC=072 - ~-

~1~~ ~'!-~~
- 2 -
cross-linked polymer that becomes apparent as gel, black
contaminant particles or other specks in the grafted
polymer in the extruder. Both gel and black contaminant
particles or other specks are unacceptable in any
significant level for many end-uses e.g. in films.
A grafting process that is less susceptible to gel
formation and speck formation has now been found.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method
for the grafting of a monomer onto a polyolefin in the
presence of an organic peroxide, said polyolefin being a
polyolefin that, when molten, undergoes cross-linking in
the presence of the organic peroxide, said method
comprising:
(a) admixing in an extruder an admixture of (i)
said polyolefin, (ii) 25 to 6000 ppm, based on the weight
of the polyolefin, of an organic peroxide coated onto a
carrier polymer, the amount of organic peroxide coated
onto said carrier polymer being at least 0.2% by weight
of the carrier polymer, and (iii) up to 5%, by weight of
the polyolefin, of a grafting monomer capable of being
grafted onto the polyolefin in the presence of the
organic peroxide;
(b) heating the admixture to a temperature above
the melting point of both the polyolefin and the carrier
polymer under admixing conditions to effect grafting of
said grafting monomer onto the polyolefin, said carrier
polymer undergoing chain scission in preference to cross-
linking in the presence of the organic peroxide at said
temperature; and
(c) extruding grafted polyolefin from the extruder.
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the
present invention, the grafted polyolefin so extruded has
a lower level of gel and specks than if the carrier
polymer had been a polyolefin that does not undergo chain
scission in the presence of the organic peroxide. In
DC-0272 - 2 -

3 -
particular, the grafted polyolefin has a lower level of
gel and specks than obtained when the polyolefin of step
(a)(i) is also used as the carrier polymer.
In another embodiment, the melting point of the
carrier polymer is higher than the melting point of the
polyolefin.
As used herein, it is understood that it may be
determined whether a polymer preferentially undergoes
chain scission or cross-linking in the presence of an
organic peroxide at the temperature of grafting by
extruding the polymer at the temperature of grafting in
the presence of the organic peroxide and determining
whether the molecular weight of the polymer increases or
decreases. As disclosed above, the temperature of
grafting is above the melting point of both the carrier
polymer and the polyolefin that is to be grafted.
The process of the present invention involves
feeding to an extruder an admixture of a polyolefin,
organic peroxide coated onto a carrier polymer and a
grafting monomer. The polyolefin may be a homopolymer of
ethylene or copolymer of ethylene or propylene, including
copolymers with the higher alpha-olefins e.g. C4-Coo alpha-
olefins, examples of which are butane-1, 4-methyl
pentane-1, hexane-1 and octane-1. In addition, the
polyolefin may be a copolymer of ethylene with one or
more other ethylenically-unsaturated monomers that are
polar in nature e.g. vinyl esters of carboxylic acids,
vinyl halides and unsaturated carboxylic acids or esters
thereof. Specific examples include copolymers of
ethylene with at least one of acrylic acid, methacrylic
acid, carbon monoxide, methyl acrylate, butyl acrylate,
methyl hydrogen maleate and vinyl acetate. In addition,
the polyolefin may be an ionomer e.g. a sodium, zinc or
aluminum ionomer of an acid copolymer formed from
ethylene and an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic
DC-0272 - 3 -

~,. i~J :X ':~.
-
acid. Examples of the above polymers are available from
Du Pont Canada Inc. or E.I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company under the trade marks Sclair~, Elvax~, Nucrel~ or
Surlyn~, depending on the particular polymer.
The organic peroxide used in the process of the
present invention has a half-life at 150°C of from about
one minute to about 120 minutes. The organic peroxide,
which as used herein includes hydroperoxides, may for
example be a peroxy ester, peroxy ketal, bis (tent.-alkyl
peroxy alkyl) benzene, dicumyl peroxide or acetylenic
diperoxy compound. Other organic peroxides are known to
those skilled in the art, including t-butyl hydroperoxide
and di-t-butyl peroxide. Preferred organic peroxides are
2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butyl peroxy) hexane and 2,5-
dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butyl peroxy)hexyne-3 which are E
available under the trade marks Lupersol 101 and 130,
respectively, from Elf Atochem. The organic peroxide is
coated onto a polymer in an amount of at least 0.2% by
weight, which may result in absorption into the polymer,
such that the polymer acts as a carrier for the organic
peroxide. The carrier polymer is a polymer that, under
the grafting conditions, undergoes chain scission in
preference to cross-linking in the presence of an organic
peroxide. In preferred embodiments, the carrier polymer
also has a melting point that is higher than the melting
point of the polyolefin, although the melting point of
the carrier polymer should not be unreasonably higher
because both the polyolefin and carrier polymer need to
become molten during the extrusion process, without
excessive heating especially excessive heating of the
polyolefin or carrier polymer above its melting point.
Examples of the carrier polymer are polypropylene,
copolymers of propylene with ethylene or other C,-Clo
alpha-olefin, poly-1-butene, copolymers of 1-butene with
minor amounts of ethylene or other C3-Clo alpha-olefin,
DC-0272 - 4 -

~~ ~ '~i
- 5 -
polystyrene, and block copolymers of styrene with a C4-C8
diene.
The,grafting monomer may be ethylenically
unsaturated carboxylic acids and ethylenically
unsaturated carboxylic acid anhydrides, including
derivatives of such acids, and mixtures thereof, and
vinyl trialkoxy silanes. Examples of the acids and
anhydrides, which may be mono, di- or polycarboxylic
acids, are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, malefic acid,
l0 fumaric acid, itaconic acid, crotonic acid, itaconic
anhydride, malefic anhydride and substituted malefic
anhydride e.g. dimethyl malefic anhydride or citraconic
anhydride, nadir anhydride, nadir methyl anhydride and
tetrahydro phthalic anhydride. Examples of derivatives
of the unsaturated acids are salts, imides, amides and
esters e.g. mono- and disodium maleate, acrylamide,
maleimide, glycidyl methacrylate and diethyl fumarate.
Examples of the vinyl trialkoxy silanes are vinyl
trimethoxy silane and vinyl triethoxy silane.
The amount of organic peroxide will depend in
particular on the characteristics of the polyolefin and
of the grafting monomer but will be in the range of 25-
6000 ppm, especially 100-3000 ppm, and particularly in
the range of 500-2000 ppm, based on the amount of
polyolefin in the admixture fed to the extruder.
The amount of monomer will depend in particular on
the reactivity of the monomer and the level of grafting
that is to be achieved. For example, if the monomer is
malefic anhydride, the amount of monomer may be as high as
about 5% by weight of the polyolefin, especially 0.1-3%
by weight and particularly in the range of 0.2-2% by
weight. With other monomers, different amounts may be
preferred.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the
temperature of the extruder, the half-life of the organic
DC-0272 - 5 -

peroxide at the extrusion temperature, the relative
melting points of the polyolefin and carrier polymer, the
rate of chain scission of the carrier polymer at the
extrusion temperature, the melt viscosities of the
polyolefin and the carrier polymer, especially during
chain scission, are all balanced to obtain uniform
distribution of the grafting monomer in the melt
sufficiently prior to decomposition of the organic
peroxide at significant rates in order to optimize the
uniformity of the grafted polyolefin, including minimal
formation of gel or black contaminants or specks. Such
an ability to optimize the process will depend on many
factors, including the particular extruder being used.
While additives may be incorporated into the
polyolefin or carrier polymer prior to feeding the
admixture to the extruder, it will be appreciated by
persons skilled in the art that some additives have
detrimental effects on the grafting process, and for that
reason should not be used in the process of the present
invention.
The components of the admixture may be fed to the
extruder in a number of ways. For example, the
polyolefin may be fed to the extruder and heated to a
molten condition. The organic peroxide, on carrier
polymer, and grafting monomer may then be fed directly
into the molten polyolefin, using the same or different
ports in the extruder. Alternatively, one or more of the
organic peroxide and grafting monomer may be fed to the
extruder simultaneously with the polyolefin, especially
the organic peroxide. The extruder should have gaod
mixing characteristics, with twin screw extruders being
the preferred type of extruder but other extruders with
good mixing characteristics may be used.
The process of the present invention may be used to
produce compositions of monomer grafted onto polyolefins
DC-0272 - 6 -

CA 02134462 2004-02-10
- 7 -
with lower levels of gel and black contaminants,
especially in comparison with the corresponding grafting
process in the absence of use of a carrier of the type
described herein. The grafted polyolefin obtained by the
process will normally be in the form of pellets or other
comminuted shapes, but is not restricted thereto. The
grafted polyolefins may be used as such or as blends with
other polymers, especially in the form of adhesive
compositions for use with polymers or metals, in co-
extrusion of multi-layer structures, in coating
compositions, as compatibilizers in filled compositions
and to improve the dyeability and printability of
polymers.
The present invention is illustrated by the
following examples.
example I
This example illustrates the degree of film
contamination formed in grafted polyolefins made using
peroxide carrier resins which are not part of the present
invention i.e. each of polymers (i), (ii) and (iii) in
Table I below, undergo cross-linking in preference to
chain scission in the presence of organic peroxide under
the grafting conditions.
The grafting extruder used in this example was an
intermeshing co-rotating twin-screw extruder with a
barrel having a ratio of length:diameter of 38:1. The
temperature was set at 235°C.
An admixture was formed in the extruder from a base
polyolefin, viz. an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer,
organic peroxide and malefic anhydride.
The organic peroxide, viz. Lupersol 10~M was coated
onto a carrier polymer. The polyolefin and organic
peroxide were each fed, as an admixture, to the extruder
in pellet form, and the malefic anhydride was fed directly
into the first zone of the extruder. The polymer was
DC-0272 - 7 -

_ g _
extruded from the extruder into water in the form of a
strand and palletized.
The grafted polyolefin was fed subsequently to a 1.9
cm diameter single screw extruder operating at 180°C and
extruded into a film having a width of 8 cm.
Gels and black contaminant particles or other specks
in a sample of the film were counted and normalized to
the weight of sample being assessed. In this example and
in the examples that follow, the measured gel and speck
level of the grafted polyolefin has been compared to the
gel and speck level of the base polyolefin extruded
through the same equipment in the absence of both organic
peroxide and grafting monomer. The grafted polyolefin
has been assigned a Gel Index based upon this comparison
according to the formula: I
Gel Index = 5 x LOGIO (NGC~~y-~)---------__)
2 0 ( NGCb", p~,obti. )
where NGC = normalized gel count.
The results for Runs 1-4 are reported in Table
I. Run 1 was a control run in which neither organic
peroxide nor grafting monomer was used. In each of Runs
2-4, the amount of malefic anhydride fed to the extruder
was 1.6% and the amount of organic peroxide fed was 1600
ppm, each based upon the total weight of the base
polyolefin plus carrier polymer.
L~C-0272 - 8 -

~~ ~:~~~~a~
- 9 -
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
1 A none - 0
2 A i 1.5 4
3 A ii 1.5 6
4 A iii 1.3 5
Note: Polyolefin A - ethylene/vinyl acetate
copolymer, containing 9% of
vinyl acetate and having a
melt index of 7 dg/min
Polymer i ~ Polyolefin A
Polymer ii - ethylene/vinyl acetate
copolymer, containing 18% of
vinyl acetate and having a
melt index of 150 dg/min
Polymer iii = ethylene/butene linear low
density copolymer
(polyethylene) havin~ a
density of 0.93 g/cm and a
melt index of 73 dg/min
As used in this example, melt index was
measured according to the procedure of ASTM D-1238 at
190°C and using a 21608 weight.
These runs demonstrate that grafting of
polyolefin A using carrier polymers which undergo
crosslinking in the presence of organic peroxides results
in a grafted product having a significantly increased
level of gels and specks.
Exaigple II
The procedure of Example.I was repeated, using
different carrier polymers which illustrate an embodiment
of the present invention i.e. using carrier polymers that
undergo chain scission in preference to cross-linking in
the presence of an organic peroxide.
In each of the runs in this example, the amount
DC-0272 - 9

- 10 -
of maleic anhydride fed to the extruder was 1.4% and the
amount of organic peroxide fed was 1200 ppm, each based
upon the total weight of the base polyolefin plus carrier
polymer. The organic peroxide employed in these runs was
Lupersol 101.
Table II
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
5 A iii 0.9 5
6 A iv 1.0 2
7 A v 1.1 1
Note Polymer iv - propylene/ethylene copolymer
having a DSC melting point of
129°C and a melt flow index o~
5 dg/min.
Polymer v = propylene/ethylene copolymer
having a DSC melting point of
135°C and a melt flow index of
6.8 dg/min.
The melt index of polymers (iv) and (v) was
measured using the procedure of ASTM D-1238 at 230°C and
with a 2160g weight. Run 5 is a comparative run, using a
polymer of Example I.
These runs demonstrate that grafting of
polyolefin A using carrier polymers which undergo
scissioning in the presence of organic peroxides results
in a grafted product having a significantly reduced level
of gels and specks.
Example IIT
The procedure of Example II was repeated, using
a different base polyolefin.
In each of the runs in this example, the amount
of malefic anhydride fed to the extruder was 1.5% and the
amount of organic peroxide fed was 1600 ppm, each based
upon the total weight of the base polyolefin plus carrier
DC-0272 - 10 -

- 11 -
polymer. The organic peroxide employed in these runs was
Lupersol 101.
Table III
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
s B vi 1.1 8
9 B iv 1.2 2
B vii 1.3 0
10 11 B viii 1.3 -2
Note Polyolefin B - ethylene/vinylacetate
copolymer, containing 28% of
Vinyl acetate and having a
melt index of 6 dg/min.
Polymer Vi - Polyolefin B
Polymer vii ~ propylene/ethylene copolymer
having a DSC melting point ofd
135°C and a melt flow index of
4.6 dg/min.
Polymer viii - propylene/ethylene copolymer
having a DSC melting point of
143°C and a melt flow index of
5 dg/min.
The melt index of Polymer B was measured at
190°C and the malt indices of polymers (vii) and (viii)
were measured at 230°C.
Run 8 is a comparative run, which employed an
ethylene/Vinyl acetate copolymer as the carrier polymer.
It exhibited a large degree of gel contamination since
this carrier polymer undergoes crosslinking predominantly
under these conditions in the presence of organic
peroxide. Runs 9-11 each employed a polypropylene
copolymer carrier and exhibit Very much lower levels of
gel because the carrier polymers undergo scissioning
predominantly under these conditions.
Example IV
The procedure of Example I was repeated, using
additional different carrier polymers which further
DC-0272 - 11 -

, ~I~i~~~'
- 12 -
illustrate of the present invention.
embodiments
In each of
the runs in
this example,
the amount
of malefic to the extruder was 1.5% and
anhydride the
fed
amount of organic
peroxide fed
was 1600 ppm
(except 2200
ppm in runs 13 and each based upon the total weight
17),
of the base polyolefinplus carrier polymer. The organic
peroxide
employed
in these
runs
was
Lupersol
101.
Table IV
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
12 A vii 1.1 0
13 A ix 0.8 0
14 A x 1.1 0
15 A xi 1.1 8
16 B iv 1.1 1
17 B ix 0.7 -1
is B xii 1.0 3
19 B xi 1.2 8
Note: Polymer ix - styrene homopolymer having
a
melt flow index of 9 dg/min.
Polymer x - butene/ethylene copolymer
having a density of 0.895
g/cm3 and a melt flow index
of
4.0 dg/min.
Polymer xi - ethylene/propylene elastomer
having a Mooney viscosity
(100C, 1+8) Of 33
Polymer xii - styrene-ethylene/butene-
styrene block copolymer having
a melt flow index of 65
dg/min.
Melt Index of polymers (ix) and (xii) was
measured at 200°C and a weight of 5000 g, whereas that
for polymer (x) was measured at 230°C and a weight of
2160 g.
Runs 12-14 and 16-18 all exhibit reduced levels
of film contaminants when compared respectively with
DC-0272 - 12 -

- 13 -
comparative Runs 15 and 19 which employed a carrier
polymer for the organic peroxide which was outside the
scope of the invention.
exam llZe V
The procedure of Example II was repeated, using
a different base polyolefin.
In each of the runs in this example, the amount
of malefic anhydride fed to the extruder was 1.5% and the
amount of organic peroxide fed was 1500 ppm, each based
upon the weight of the base polyolefin plus carrier
polymer. The organic peroxide employed in these runs was
Lupersol 101.
Table V
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
C xiii 1.4 4
21 C iV 1.5 -1
20 Note: Polyolefin C ~ ethylene/methyl acrylate
copolymer, containing 21% of
methyl acrylate and having a
melt index of 2 dg/min.
Polymer xiii - ethylene/methyl acrylate
copolymer, containing 20% of
methyl acrylate and having a
melt index of 5 dg/min.
Melt index was measured at 190°C using a weight
of 21608. Run 20 is a comparative example.
This example again shows the reduction in gel
count that is obtainable.
Example VI
The procedure of Example II was repeated, using
a different base polyolefin.
In each of the runs in this example, the amount
of malefic anhydride fed to the extruder was 1.1% and the
amount of organic peroxide fed was 570 ppm, each based
upon the weight of the base polyolefin plus carrier
DC-0272 - 13 -

~~=~, ~~-~-r
N ~. ~ ~~ a-~ ~,.
- 14 -
polymer. The organic peroxide employed in these runs was
Lupersol 101. The carrier polymers were as defined
previously.
Table V
Base Carrier % Monomer Gel
Run No. Polyolefin Polymer Grafted Index
22 D iii 0.7 7
23 D vii 0.7 4
Note: Polyolefin - ethylene/butene-1
D linear
low
density copolymer having
a
density of 0.92 g/cm' and
a
melt index
of 12 dg/min.
Melt index
was measured
at 190C
using a
weight
of 21608. Run 22 is comparativeexample.
a
This exampleagain showsthe reduction in
gel
count that
is obtainable.
DC-0272 - 14 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2134462 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2010-04-22
Letter Sent 2009-04-22
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-08-30
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-30
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-30
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-08-30
Revocation of Agent Request 2007-08-10
Appointment of Agent Request 2007-08-10
Grant by Issuance 2005-11-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-11-14
Pre-grant 2005-09-01
Inactive: Final fee received 2005-09-01
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-06-30
Letter Sent 2005-06-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-06-30
Letter Sent 2005-05-24
Letter Sent 2005-05-24
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-05-17
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2005-04-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-12-22
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-10-04
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2004-09-02
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2004-09-02
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-21
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-21
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-21
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-21
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-15
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-07-15
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-15
Inactive: Office letter 2004-07-15
Appointment of Agent Request 2004-06-29
Revocation of Agent Request 2004-06-29
Revocation of Agent Request 2004-06-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2004-06-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2004-06-17
Revocation of Agent Request 2004-06-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-04-22
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2004-04-19
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-02-10
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-12-04
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2001-07-19
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2001-05-31
Letter Sent 2001-05-31
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2001-05-31
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-04-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-04-23
Appointment of Agent Request 1999-03-15
Revocation of Agent Request 1999-03-15
Inactive: Office letter 1999-03-02
Revocation of Agent Request 1999-01-27
Appointment of Agent Request 1999-01-27
Revocation of Agent Request 1998-12-08
Appointment of Agent Request 1998-12-08
Inactive: Office letter 1998-10-26
Inactive: Office letter 1998-10-26
Revocation of Agent Request 1998-09-09
Appointment of Agent Request 1998-09-09
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1997-04-22
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1997-04-22
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-11-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-04-22
1997-04-22

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-03-30

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1998-04-22 1998-03-10
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1999-04-22 1999-04-01
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2000-04-24 2000-03-22
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2001-04-23 2001-03-28
Request for examination - standard 2001-04-23
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2002-04-22 2002-03-27
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2003-04-22 2003-03-31
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2004-04-22 2004-03-29
2004-06-19 2004-06-17
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - standard 11 2005-04-22 2005-03-30
Registration of a document 2005-04-12
Final fee - standard 2005-09-01
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2006-04-24 2006-03-06
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2007-04-23 2007-03-08
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2008-04-22 2008-03-07
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
DAVID JOHN MITCHELL
PETER YATES KELLY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1995-11-03 14 617
Claims 1995-11-03 3 104
Abstract 1995-11-03 1 34
Claims 2004-02-09 3 109
Claims 2004-12-21 3 101
Description 2004-02-09 14 468
Reminder - Request for Examination 2000-12-26 1 119
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-05-30 1 178
Notice of Insufficient fee payment (English) 2004-04-18 1 92
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-06-29 1 160
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-06-02 1 171
Correspondence 1998-10-25 1 8
Correspondence 1998-10-25 1 9
Correspondence 1999-03-01 2 12
PCT 1994-10-25 2 81
Correspondence 1998-09-08 6 146
Correspondence 2004-06-16 3 70
Correspondence 2004-06-28 3 98
Correspondence 2004-07-14 1 13
Correspondence 2004-07-14 1 20
Correspondence 2004-06-16 3 77
Correspondence 2004-07-19 2 89
Correspondence 2004-07-20 1 13
Correspondence 2004-07-20 1 15
Correspondence 2005-08-31 1 36
Correspondence 2007-08-09 3 62
Correspondence 2007-08-29 1 18
Correspondence 2007-08-29 1 20
Fees 1997-04-01 1 90
Fees 1995-11-01 1 40
Correspondence 1995-11-22 1 14
Fees 1994-10-25 1 51