Language selection

Search

Patent 2136778 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2136778
(54) English Title: FIBRE REINFORCED SHEATHING WITH TEXTURED FINISH
(54) French Title: PANNEAU DE REVETEMENT RENFORCE DE FIBRES AVEC FINI TEXTURE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B32B 5/28 (2006.01)
  • E4C 2/26 (2006.01)
  • E4F 13/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CAMPACCI, GARY (Canada)
  • LABERGE, JACQUES (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • GARY CAMPACCI
  • JACQUES LABERGE
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: MOFFAT & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1994-11-28
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1996-05-29
Examination requested: 2001-11-19
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A sheathing panel comprises a foamed thermosetting polymer
sheet in which are dispersed reinforcing fibres or filaments. The
fibres or filaments are selected from the group including
fibreglass, kevlar, nylon and other fibres or filaments having
sufficient tensile strength to reinforce a rigid foam panel. The
thermosetting polymer is selected from the group including
polyurethane, polystyrene, polyisocynate, polyisocyanurate, and
other rigid setting thermoset polymers.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A sheathing panel comprising a foamed thermosetting polymer
sheet in which are dispersed reinforcing fibres or filaments.
2. A sheathing panel as in Claim 1 wherein said fibres or
filaments are selected from the group including fibreglass,
kevlar, nylon and other fibres or filaments having sufficient
tensile strength to reinforce a rigid foam panel.
3. A sheathing panel as in Claim 2, wherein said thermosetting
polymer is selected from the group including polyurethane,
polystyrene, polyisocynate, polyisocyanurate, and other rigid
setting thermoset polymers.
4. A process for manufacturing a fibre or filament reinforced
foamed thermoset polymer sheathing panel, comprising the steps
of:
a) arranging one or more mats of fibres or filaments in
a first zone;
b) applying to said mat or mats an expanding thermoset
plastic foam;
c) permitting said foam to expand, whereby said mat or
mats of fibres or filaments expands with said foam to
form a reinforced foam sheet;
d) at a predetermined thickness of foam, pressing said
foam sheet to cause it to set at such thickness,
whereby a smooth reinforced thermoset foam sheet is
obtained.

5. A process for manufacturing a fibre or filament as claimed
in claim 4, wherein said fibres or filaments are selected from
the group including fibreglass, kevlar, and other fibres or
filaments having sufficient tensile strength to reinforce a
foamed thermoset polymer.
6. A process for manufacturing a fibre or filament as claimed
in Claim 5, wherein said thermoset polymer is selected from the
group including polyurethane, polystyrene, polyisocyanate,
polyisocyanurate, and other thermoset polymers capable of forming
a rigid sheathing board.
7. A method of constructing a wall comprising the steps of:
a ) erecting a frame of studs;
b) applying over that frame a sheathing panel as claimed
in claim 1, 2 or 3, or manufactured in accordance with
claim 4, 5 or 6;
c) applying over said panel a reinforcing mesh of fibres
or filaments chosen from the group including
fibreglass, kevlar, and other fibres or filaments of
equivalent or higher tensile strength;
d) applying over said reinforcing mesh two or more
coatings of a cementitous, acrylic, or acrylic/
cementitous mortar or parge.
8. A method of constructing a wall as claimed in Claim 7,
wherein the final coating of mortar or parge is architecturally
textured.

9. A method of constructing a wall as claimed in Claim 7 or 8,
wherein said studs are made from a material selected from steel
or wood.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~3677~
The present invention relates to the field of building
materials, and building techniques. In particular, the present
invention provides a novel reinforced foam sheathing board, and
a construction technique ut; 1 i 7 ing such a board.
It i8 conventional for construction of a wall for a
structure having an exterior facing surface to be constructed
using a frame of studs, between which is packed insulation
material, such as fibreglass. Sheathing, typically plywood or
chip-board is nailed to the studs. A further layer of insulation
in the form of a board of, for instance, polystyrene, may then
be applied over the sheathing, and then a waterproofing layer may
be applied followed by a fini~h;n~ layer such as brick, stucco,
or prefabricated siding.
There i8 no substantial structural drawback to the
construction technique broadly outlined above, and many
structures have been successfully completed according to such a
technique. The external insulation layer mentioned is often
excluded, because it lacks structural strength, however.
Moreover, the manufacture of wood based sheathing cu~ ~ timber
resources, both renewable and non-renewable.
The present invention is concerned, therefore, with both of
the drawbacks to traditional stud-frame construction mentioned
above: the tendency not to apply external or "added" insulation,
and the desire to utilize materials other than wood to
manufacture sheathing.
--1--

. 2136778
The problems of the present art are adhered by the present
invention in that the present invention provides a novel
sheathing board, to replace wooden sheathing boards. The novel
board of the present invention itself has significant thermal
5 insulating properties.
In a broad aspect, therefore, the present invention relates
to a sheathing panel comprising a foamed thermosetting polymer
sheet in which are dispersed reinforcing fibres or filaments.
Preferably, the said fibres or filaments are selected from
10 the group including fibreglass, kevlar, nylon and other fibres
or filaments having sufficient tensile strength to reinforce a
rigid foam panel.
Moreover, the thermosetting polymer is in a preferred
: ~ ~ir t selected from the group including polyurethane,
15 polystyrene, polyisocyanate, polyiso~:y~lluL~e~ and other rigid
setting thermoset polymers.
In another broad aspect, the present invention relates to
a process for manufacturing a fibre or filament reinforced foamed
thP .ct polymer sheathing panel, comprising the steps of: (a)
20 arranging one or more mats of fibres or filaments in a first
zone; (b) applying to said mat or mats an ~Yr~nfl;ng thermoset
plastic foam; (c) permitting said foam to expand, whereby said
mat or mats of fibres or filaments expands with said foam to form
a reinforced foam sheet; and (d) at a predet~; n~d thickness of
--2--

2136778
.
-foam, pressing said foam sheet to cause it to Get at such
thickness, whereby a smooth reinforced thermoset foam sheet is
obtained .
In the process for manufacturing a fibre or filaDent of the
5 present invention, the fibres or filaments are preferably
selected from the group including fibreglass, kevlar, and other
fibres or filaments having sufficient tensile strength to
reinforce a foamed thermoset polymer.
Also, in the process for manufacturing a fibre or filament
10 of the present invention the th~ .ct polymer is most
effectively selected from the group including polyurethane,
polystyrene, polyisocyanate, polyisocyanurate, and other
thermoset polymers capable of forming a rigid sheathing board.
In a further broad aspect, a method of constructing a wall
15 comprising the steps of: (a) erecting a frame of studs; (b)
applying over that frame the sheathing panel of the present
invention, or a sheating panel manuf actured in accordance with
the manufacturing method of the present invention; (c) applying
over said panel a reinforcing mesh of fibres or filaments chosen
20 from the group including fibreglass, kevlar, and other fibres or
filaments of equivalent or higher tensile strength; and (d)
applying over said reinforcing mesh two or more coatings of a
cementitous, acrylic, or acrylic/cementitous mortar or parge.
--3--

2136778
.
The final coating of mortar or parge is architecturally
textured .
Fur~h- ,le, it will be understood that the studs are made
from a material selected from steel or wood.
In drawings that illustrate the present invention by way of
example:
Figure 1 is a cross-sectional view of a stud-frame wall
constructed with the sheathing board of the present invention,
and according to the method of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a flow chart of the sheathing manufacturing
techni~ue of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a cross section view of a concrete wall finished
with the sheathing board of the present invention, according to
the method of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a perspective schematic of a sheathing layout
according to the present invention; and
Figure 5 is a cross sectional view of an expansion joint
between sheathing boards of the present invention.
Referring now to Figures 1 and 4 of the drawings, a typical
application of the present invention is illustrated. A frame of
studs 1, which may be either wood or steel ( or other metal ) in
composition is provided. In the case of wooden studs, 2 X 4 or
2 X 6 f ir studs are typical . In the case of steel studs,
preferably cold formed galvanized sheet steel, meeting ASTM 446,
hot dip galvanized or zinc coated, for corrosion resistance.
--4--

2136778
. .
Insulating material, such as fibreglass bats, may be inserted
between the studs for thermal insulation.
In a prior art installation, it will be understood that
plywood or similar sheathing board will then be applied directly
5 to the studs, and then an insulation board, optionally, over the
sheathing. In the present invention, however, a sheathing board
3 that is fabricated from fibreglass (typically) reinforced
f-Yr~n~l~cl foam is attached directly to the stud 1 frame. As can
be observed from Figure 4 the application of the sheathing boards
10 3 of the present invention the boards are applied in horizontal
orientation, staggered so that joints are not vertically aligned.
Moreover, at the outer corners of the t,LLU.;~ULl:S, an alternating
arrangement is also achieved, as may be seen in Figure 4.
The sheathing boards are attached to the studs by corrosion
resistant fasteners 2, preferably conforming to ASTM C1002.
Choice of a suitable fastener will, however, be obvious to one
skilled in the art.
A reinforcing mesh, such as a #0040 fibreglass mesh is then
fastened to the exterior surface of the sheathing board, in a
20 smooth, and even manner. The mesh is then bonded to the face of
the sheathing board by one, and preferably two applications of
a preparation coat such as DuRock Prep Coat R. This is an
acrylic based, cementitous coat, designed to firmly bond the
fibre mesh to the sheathing boar~. After setting, a base coat,
25 such as a coat of acrylic DuRock Base Coat is applied. A final
--5--

213~778
.
textured coat is applied over the base coat, with a fini~::hin~
sealer optionally applied over the textured coat.
Referring to Figure 3, it will be seen that the sheathing
board of the present invention may also be utilized with positive
5 effect over solid concrete walls 9. In such a case, it will be
observed, fibre mesh 4 is wrapped around behind the sheathing,
and the aforementioned cementitous-acrylic prep-coat 5 is applied
in a fairly heavy coat between the sheathing and the concrete
wall .
E~eferring to Figure 5, it will be noted that in applications
involving layer wall surfaces - for instance surfaces more than
250 sq. feet, or in applications in which there i8 a transition
to a different building material - such as brick - a ~ ssion
6eal 8 is desirable. A suitable, es~ion seal is an Emseal~
15 Backerseal, under compression, and coated on its external surface
with a silicone sealant. The edges of the sheathing forming the
joint ought to be lined with a waterproof lining.
Referring now to Figure 2, the novel manufacturing process
of the present invention to fabricate the sheathing boards of the
20 present invention is schematically illustrated. ~ne, and
preferably two, fibreglass mats are wound off of rolls to a board
forming area having a smooth, flat surface. A series of spray
nozzles above that surface sprays a curable ~r~nrqi n~ thermo-
setting foam, such as a polystyrene or polyurethane foam into the
25 fibreglass mats. As the foam expands, it tends to expand the
--6--

~. . ~13~778
f ibreglass mats, and as it expands to a predetermined thickness,
it is drawn through an expansion area to a roller or the like,
where it is pressed to maintain the predet~r-n; n~d thickness. It
has been observed that the fibre from the mats expands with the
5 foam throughout the final board and adds sufficient structural
strength to permit the board of the present invention to be used
without an underlying plywood or similar sheathing board.
It is to be understood that the examples described above are
not meant to limit the scope of the present invention. It is
10 expected that numerous variants will be obvious to the person
skilled in the field of building materials and design and
manufactur without any departure from the spirit of the
invention . The ~srp~rled claims, properly construed, f orm the
only limitation upon the scope o~ the invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-11-28
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2003-11-28
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-11-28
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2002-01-15
Letter Sent 2002-01-15
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2002-01-15
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2002-01-15
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2002-01-15
Inactive: Entity size changed 2002-01-15
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2001-11-28
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-11-19
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-11-19
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1996-05-29

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-11-28

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2001-11-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 1997-11-28 1997-10-30
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 1998-11-30 1998-08-05
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 1999-11-29 1999-09-13
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2000-11-28 2000-08-15
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2001-11-28 2001-11-19
Request for examination - standard 2001-11-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GARY CAMPACCI
JACQUES LABERGE
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1998-01-21 1 30
Cover Page 1996-09-05 1 15
Description 1996-05-28 7 247
Abstract 1996-05-28 1 14
Claims 1996-05-28 3 71
Drawings 1996-05-28 2 124
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-07-30 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2002-01-14 1 178
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-12-26 1 176
Correspondence 1996-01-25 2 35
Fees 2001-11-18 1 37
Fees 1997-10-29 2 68
Fees 1998-08-04 1 46
Fees 1999-09-12 1 35
Fees 2000-08-14 1 35
Fees 1996-11-12 1 33