Language selection

Search

Patent 2137096 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2137096
(54) English Title: PLATED COIN AND A METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME
(54) French Title: FLAN PLAQUE ET METHODE POUR SA FABRICATION
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 38/40 (2006.01)
  • A44C 21/00 (2006.01)
  • B32B 15/01 (2006.01)
  • C23C 18/48 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RINKE, HORST (Germany)
  • KOLB-TELIEPS, ANGELIKA (Germany)
  • HEUBNER, ULRICH (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • KRUPP VDM GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • KRUPP VDM GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1994-12-01
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-06-04
Examination requested: 1996-12-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 43 41 226.2 (Germany) 1993-12-03

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention concerns procoss for the production of coins consisting mainly of
chromium steel, the blanks for stamping consisting of a stainless steel core with an
0.2% proof strength of at least 200 N/mm2, plated on either side with non-ferrous
metal, preferably consisting of 60% to 100% copper, whose 0.2% proof strength is a
minimum of 40 N/mm2 below the 0.2% proof strengh of the core.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Patent Claims:
1. Plated coin consisting of a minimum 80 % by mass of
chromium steel with a ferritic, austenitic or duplex
structuxe wherein the core consists of soft or solution
annealed stainless steel whose 0,2 % proof strength at room
temperature is at least 220 N/mm2, plated on either side with
non-ferrous metal whose 0,2 % proof strength is a minimum of
40 N/mm2 below the 0,2 % proof strength of the core.
2. Coin as in Claim 1 whose core consists of soft or solution
annealed stainless steel whose 0,2 % proof strength is at
least 220 N/mm2, plated on either side with non-ferrous metal
whose 0,2 % proof strength is a minimum of 25 % below the
0,2 % proof strength of the core.

3. Coin as in Claim 1 or 2 with the following distinguishing features:
The stainless steel core is made up (in % by mass) as follows:
C ?0.03
Si ?2.0
Mn 0.5 to 1.5
P ?0.045
S ?0.030
N ?0.03
Cr 10.5 to 12.5
Ni 0.3 to 1
remainder iron and smelting impurities
4. Coin as in Claim 1 to 3 with the following distinguishing features:
The core is plated with 2 non-ferrous alloy containing 60% to 100% by mass
copper.
5. Coin as in Claim 4 with the following distinguishing features:
The core is plated with a copper alloy containing 1% to 2.5% by mass tin
6. Coin as in Claim 4 or 5 with the following distinguishing features:
The core is plated with brass.
7. Process for the production of plated coins consisting of a minimum 80% by
mass of chromium steel with a ferritic, austenitic or duplex structure with the
following distinguighing features:
The blanks are punched out of rolled composite strip consisting of a stainless
steel core plated on both sides and are sent for stamping without the edges
being electroplated.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


01 DEZ '94 16:24 COHfWSZ & FLOR~CK PRTENTRNI~IRELTE P.4
al370s6
BACRGROUND OF THE INVEN~IO~I
The imention is based on the well-known production of coins using stainle5s steel
plated blanlcs, ie. blanks cons:>~;- g of a co..,~Gsite sar,d~icll confo~ g to DE ~8 17
657 Al ~th a ferritic chromium steel corc plated on either side with higha quality
~ustenitic chro.,-iu~-- nickel steel.
Mints are as a general rulc conservative in thcir a~titude and seldom depart from
co..v~.lional techniq.,~ ~ The face value of a coin u~ed to be equal to the ~alue of the
weight of copper, silver or gold it cG~t~ r~i The inc~eas;~g demand for coins resulting
~rom ;...Iu~ io., and the growth of CO~IU~ ICC meant that, from thc nud-
r.;..~tcen~h century onwards, the metsl value of the coms in circulation camc tor.,~r~,.e.lt a mere ~action of their nonunal Yaluc. When replacing the t~dition~l
coinage metals, namely gold and silver, with other matcrials ~lle...~ were o~en made
to rctain the colour ofthe coins, using niclcel as a sobstinlte for silver and cert~n alloys
of copper instead of gold.
As early as 1920, Ullmann's "Enzyklop~die der tccluu5~,11e.l Chemie" (Urban &
Sch-40u4e~n~c~, 8th edinon, 1920), p 59 ff., ~ives various methods of plating core
matenals. On p. 71, in panicular, the plating of cop~,l~-c and copl~e,~:~nc/niclcel
alloys ~nth copper, iron and steel is descnbed, vvhich at least gives the outward
impression th~t the coin is made ofthe matenal uscd to platc it.
If, ho~-~, it is intended to use such plating p~ocesses to produce an cspccially cheap
coin onc possibility is to roll-clad p1ain carbon steel strip on both sides with higher
~uality metal and punch blanks out for ~ ;ng as coin. Rumania in thc carly 1940swas the first countly to introduce nickel plated steel coins (denolnin~tion 100 lei)
m~nuf~ctl-red by this process. The plating on cither side accounted for 3 .5% of the
coin's thickness; its weight WaQ 8.5 g and its tiametet 28 mm. The p~ nQ werefollowed by the Bu~garians who uscd an 80~/o copper/20% nickel alloy to pla~e their
coins
'rbe success of this method in these COUI~tlieS resulted in plated coins of this kind being
introduccd in Germany in ls48. Thcse were 1, ~ and 10 pfcnniE~ pieces, followed
somewhat later by a 2 pferu~ig piece.
DEC I ' 94 1 1 :23 +49 21 1 9049049 PRGE .004

-
01 DEZ '94 16:Z4 COH~USZ ~ FLORRCK PRTENTR~WRELTE P.5
3 2 1 3709 6
Coins struck ~om rolled co,npos;tes of this l~nd have edges at which the carbon steel
core is ~posed Even though the thin film of higher quali~ plating drawn over these
edges when the blanks are punched out is soon abraded by ~qn~lling. this does not
co.,~ u~e a problcm in our te.~ . .te climlte In thc tropic~ rusting is more app~ ..t
and tho edges havc to be protecled. One way of doing th~s i9 elcctroplating blank~
made ~om rolled Co~lpGSitCs with higher qualisy metals in accordance with DE 39 40
244 Al.
Another possibility is to electroplat~ plain carbon steel blanlcs all o~er.
A disa~v~ntage of clc~rùpla~ing is the problem of env;,~ c..~-fricndly dispostl of the
waste water from the process. The finishir~g of rolled composites by electroplating also
constitutes a cost factor that grows in sig.~ificau~ce in imcr-le proportion to the ssze of
he coins ~lecsroplating the srnaller coins in a series cu,,,p,;~--g diff~rent sizes take~ a
dis~ropo, .iona~e amo~nt of time.
In this linc of developmr~ t thc stainless steel coin c~l rG~ n~ to DE 38 17 6S7 A1
dcl~ ,ib~ at thc outset meets the requirernent of increased corrosion rcs;~lance, when
used in the maMer snd for the purposc ~ ;sa~, and can bc ,. ~ ~ by the
efficies~t and c~ono.,l;~l rolling process, protucing a rolled composite c.~.-c;~l;ng of a
stainless stcel core plated with stainless steel and blanks r. ~ui~h~g no electroplating and
gi~ing risc to nonc ofthe ~ nl cnv;.on .~ *l p~b1e...s.
The stainle~s stee3s used, namely X6Crl7 for the core u~d X5CrN119I I for ~he plating,
are both suitable for hcading ant lhc. ~fol ~ for coinage and are 50 similar with regard
to the relevant prop~ s of stren8th ~hat the cor.,pGs;Le tak~s the starnp well despite
the hi8h solidity of thc corc.
Ha-ving said this, it must be added that the hi8her strength ofthe core by c~ ;son
with copper plated carbon steel blanks rcquires more mec~nical force and, in
particular, more wear resistant ,~."~,ing tools when ~hc coins arc struck
DEC I ' 94 1 1 :Z3 +49 21 1 9049049 Pf:lGE.005

01 DEZ '94 16: 25 COHRlJSZ ~ FLORf~CK PRTENTR~RELTE 2 1 3 7 0 9 6 P. 6
.
The p~lc n~ involYet in minting stainlcs~ steel coins havc accor~ ly bcen ~
rc_u.~ obstacle so ~heir uridu~ead usc The high 0.2% proof strcn~th of the
requisite stainless steels - at lcas~ ~00 I~lmrn~ in thc case of a~ e XSCrNil810(Gerrnan Matcrial~ S~andard 1.4~01) ~nd X5Cr~i l 812 (Garnan ~aterials Standard
1.4303) and at least 2S0 N/mm~ in the case of fcrrite X6Crl7 (Gcrman Materi~ls
Stantart 1.4306) - pcnnits only a low relicf, ic a vcry fl~ stamp i.n~es~on, thehei~h~ of thc rclief being unable to exceet that of the onginal rollcd matcrial by more
than approx 20%.
In addition to the lovr relicfthat has hitherto been a.,L,~ ~'e wcar ~n the ~ g
tool is vcly grcat as a result of the hardncss ofthe stainlcss steds used. ~hcrea- the
h~.J... ss value of soft a~lne~led ferntfc CL,~ IJ~ steel X6Crl7 may be bctvveen I45
and lS5 HV 30, a muc~t lower hardncss can be achie ed ~rith non-ferrous metals, eg
70 to 85 HV 30 tn thc case of copper alloys. Given that the savice life of the ~"'Y;"8
tool r~ 5~n~5 ~ complcx function of n~ll,e.vus factors inct.Jdi-,g matial, shape,
stroke speed etc., thc hardness of the coin blank is nnn~theless one of the major
influ~cn.
The aim of the in~'e.~ti~A iS to produce an il~c ~ycl~7;~., plated coin requ~.tng no
l.cat,.l~lt of the edges after the blanks havc becn punched out to assure ad! ~ e
conro~;on rP~ noc, even if the coins are to be expose~ to l-..fa~,ou-~'c co~ ons~
which is cnvironnlc.~l-friendly and ~c~r~ b'c, docs not a.lv~,seJy af~ect thc sen~ice life
of the stamping tools ~nd offers more scope with re8ard to relief impression.
DESCRIP~ION OF TH~ NTION
The invention relates to a plated coin consisting of a
minimum 80 ~ by mass of chromuum steel with a ferritic,
austenitic or duplex stmcture wherein the core consiscs of
soft or solution ~nne~l ed stainless steel whose o, 2 ~ proof
strength at room teT:~perature is at least 220 N/mm2, plated or~
either side with non-~errous ~netal whose 0, 2 ~ proof strength
is a minimvm of 40 N/mm2 below the 0, 2 ~ proof strength of
che core.
Surprisingly, the bi8 ~li~, e..ce in the 0 2% proof ,~ th~, ie. forming the hardstainless stccl through a r.,l~ti~_ly soft int~,.,..cdh~c snaterial, presents no obstacle to
~tta;~lmenr ofthe dcsired rcliefimpression and no s;an;~ shortening ofthe sesvice
life of the ,l A "l-;"g tools was observed. Appar~ .~tl~ the soft plating works as a
lubricant betweal the stamping tool and the contours of the hl~pre~;on.
The vely much lower 0.2% proof ~ .l.s of the non-ferrous me~als - eg. only max.
100 Nlrnrn2 in the case of soft anncalcfJ copper, max. 160 Nl~run2 in the casc of so*
n~ t brass Cu~8 and ~nax 150 NIITun2 in the r.,asc of so~ nr~1e~ tin bronze
CuSn2 - ~u~,.;a;n~l~ permit thc ~lr:~ ~ At of a Yery much deeper and c~caner
i,n~cs~;on despite thc stainlcss steel corc, ~ ;~B~B the disat~ar tage ofthe flat
~ .on p.u...,ced on stainless sled by about one half~ depc~ g on thc ~h ~L ..~5 of
thc plating, and n ~ ~ a. J;ngly ~. v. h d ng a ~gh relie
DEC I '94 1 1 :24 +49 21 1 9049049 PF~GE .006

01 DEZ '94 16: Z5 COHÇWSZ 8~ FLORÇ~CK PF~TENTR~I~ELTE P. 7
~ 2137(196
These findings led to the use of higher strength stainlcss steeis and a further
development involving the ~h ~ g of blsnks with a soft or solution aMealet stainless
steel corc whose 0.2% proof strength is at least 220 N/mm2, plsted on either side with
non.ferrous metal whosc 0.2% proof strcngth is a min;-rlu-rt of 25% below the 0.2%
proof strength of thc core.
From the point of vie~ of cconG~ it was especially advantageous to producc coiris
with a ~tainless steel core made up (in % by mass) 29 follows (German Materials
Standard 1.4003)
C s0.03
Si S2.0
Mn 0.S to 1.5
P 5 0.045
S 5 0.030
N c0.03
Cr 10.S to 12.S
- Nl 0.3 to I
,dcr iron and smetting impunties.
With modem methods of steel p,od~ ;on it i8 possiblc to make stainless steel vcr,Y
cheaply ant adapt it - as in the case of the stainless sted referrcd to abovc which
co.lfo~n.s to Ge~nan Materials Standard 1.4003 - to resist certain kinds of co--vs;~,c
i"nucnce, ie. to be econu"ucal with e,.p~ s,~e alloy ,Olllj)O~,.ltS.
The p.~fc.~d metals for plating arc non-ferrous alloys con~ ;ng 60% to 1Q0%
copper. Copper alloys such as brass containing at least 1% to 2.S% by mass tin are
cquslly suita~le
Copper alloys in particular offer the possibility of varying colour, eg. the reddish tone
of pure copper and ~he gold tone of brass, 71tho~gh it must be noted that the ed~e of
the coin will bc of a different colour. Wlth a view to the easy distinction bctween coins
that is otcen desired particularly in less afrluent countries, the inYeMion offers a Yariety
of colours and colour co"t,d,Ls including coins with a reddish to yellow face and a
bllle-white to off-white ed8e or, alternatively, a largely uniform o~verall colour with a
white face and blue-white to off-white edge. On the other hand, the carbon steel core
Ii3cdy to be used in such countries will lead to the edge bcco.. ~.ng dirty 8rey-biack with
use or, in the tropics, even rusty.
Aside from such cons;d~ ions, it is also advantageous to be able ~o s~a~np the blanks
punched out of rolled co"~ os;l~ strip con,;s~ing of a stainless steel core plated on both
sides without having to cl~l~6~e the edges.
Examples of coins produced in accordance with the invention are as follows.
1. Copper with an 0.2~l/D proof strength of max. 100 NlrNn: on austenitic steel
XSCrNi l 810 (Gerrnzn Materials Standart 1.4301) with an 0 2% proof strengh
- of at least. 200 Nlmm' The plating is rolled on to the core to a th~cL-npss of 2 x
3% coppcr ant thc resultant co.,.posi~e strip made into coins. The faccs and
edges of thc coins c~ince no noteworth~ di~.c.~ce in corrosion re, ~ e
when used in the manner and for the pu~pose e..~;s~ged.
DEC I ' 94 ~ I :25 +49 21 1 9049049 Pf~GE.007

01 DEZ 94 16:26 COHf~USZ ~ FLOR~CK P~TENTRNWRELTE 2137û96 P.8
The blue-white colour of the edge provides a clear contrast ~nth the reddish
colour of ~he faces. Both the production scrap and the coins themselves can be
re~ycled and used for the production of speci~l alloy., cont~inir~g copper such
as X3CrCuMoTi2723 (German Materials Standard 1.4S03), MCr20CuMo
(Ge~marl Materials Standard Z.45~3) and NiC~2lMo (Gcrman Matenals
Standard 2.S858)
2. Brass CuZn28 4ith ar 0.2% proofstrength of max. 160 NJmrn2 on ausi~,.ul;c
stéel X~CrNil81Z (German Mataials Standard 1.4303) with an 0.2% proof
strength of at least. 200 N/mm2 and norrnally 220 Nlrnrn2 to 250 N/rnrn~. The
plating is rolled on to the core to a thicl~ness of 2 x 2.5% brass and the
resultant co."~ e strip made into coins. The faces and edges of the coins
evince no no~eworthy Ji~ ce in corrosion ~ ce ~hen used in the
manner and for the purpo.,e envisaged. The blue.-white colour of the ed8e
provides a clear contrast with the yellow colour of the faces. Both the
production scrap and the coins themselves can be recycled in the usual way for
bras~, p~ated coins.
3. Nlckel 99.2 with an 0.2% proof strcngdl of 120 N~rnrn~ to 150 M/r~ on
ferritic chromium steel X2Crl I (Gerrnan Ma2en~1s Standart l .4003) w~th an
0.2% proof strength of 220 ~7/mm~ to 2S0 N/rnrn~ or X6Crl7 (Gerrnan
Materials Standard 1.4016) with an 0.2% proof strength of 275 ~i/mrn2 to ~40
N/rnrn~. The plating is rolled on to the core to a thickness of 2 x 2.5%, 2 ~c 5%
or 2 x 10% nickel and the result~nt composite strip made into coins and
tokens. The faccs and edges of the coins e~nnce no noteworthy Ji~re.~ce in
corrosion .~;,l~r.~ c when used in the manner and for the purpose envisaged.
The edges and faces lre of virtuallr uniform coloùr. Both thc production scrap
and the coins thc.~:,el~cs can be rccyclcd as alloy steel scrap with no difflculty.
With rcgard ~o suitabillty for coin testing d~ices, matenals 1 and 2 are not
ferrom~gnetic whereas rT-ateris13 is. A plated coin with a carbon steel core is slways
ferrom~gnetic. Selection can be m~de acco.Jingly.
~lle invention also allows wide scope for sclection of varjous kinds of relief and is
especially well suited to 8 y~O;e ': g stalllp.
Convensional production procedures ar,d, to a larBe extent, conventional equipmes~t
can ~e used. Acco. ~in,21~, the plating and punching out of the blanlcs is almost slways
followed by ~he cold forming of a nlillcd edgc. The finished blaslks are then so~
~nne~ed and sent to the mint for stamping.
DEC I ' 94 1 1: 25 +49 21 1 9049049 PRGE .008

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2137096 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2000-12-01
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2000-12-01
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1999-12-01
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-05-22
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-05-22
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1996-12-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1996-12-11
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-06-04

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1999-12-01

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1998-09-30

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Request for examination - standard 1996-12-11
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1997-12-01 1997-10-30
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1998-12-01 1998-09-30
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KRUPP VDM GMBH
Past Owners on Record
ANGELIKA KOLB-TELIEPS
HORST RINKE
ULRICH HEUBNER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1995-06-03 1 13
Description 1995-06-03 5 256
Claims 1995-06-03 2 44
Description 1995-10-15 10 360
Abstract 1995-10-15 1 13
Claims 1995-10-15 2 44
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1999-12-28 1 185
Fees 1996-11-17 1 62