Language selection

Search

Patent 2139799 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2139799
(54) English Title: DETONATOR PROTECTOR
(54) French Title: PROTECTEUR DE DETONATEURS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F42B 39/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HEDGER, JOHN THOMAS (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • ORICA EXPLOSIVES TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • ORICA EXPLOSIVES TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD. (Australia)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1995-01-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-07-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
PM 3378 (Australia) 1994-01-14

Abstracts

English Abstract


A protector for use in the transportation and storage of detonators
comprising,
a detonator holder which is open at one end for insertion of a detonator
and closed at the other end, and which radially encloses the base charge of
said detonator,
at least one detonator retaining means integral with the detonator holder,
and
a first wall which is radially spaced around the holder, and wherein the
holder and wall define a space,
wherein in use, the detonator retaining means holds the detonator within
the holder such that a free volume is provided around the base charge of the
detonator.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


We claim as follows;
1. A protector for use in the transportation and storage of detonators
comprising,
a detonator holder which is open at one end for insertion of a detonator
and closed at the other end, and which radially encloses the base charge of
said detonator,
at least one detonator retaining means integral with the detonator holder,
and
a first wall which is radially spaced around the holder, and wherein the
holder and wall define a space,
wherein in use, the detonator retaining means holds the detonator within
the holder such that a free volume is provided around the base charge of
the detonator.
2. A protector according to claim 1 wherein the free volume extends along
the entire length of the detonator shell.
3. A protector according to claims 1 or 2 wherein the detonator retaining
means comprises projections on the interior of the detonator holder.
4. A protector for use in the transportation and storage of detonators
according to any of claims 1 to 3 wherein at least two protectors are joined
together to form a set of protectors.
5. A protector according to any of the preceding claims wherein the material
of construction is high density polyethylene.
6. A protector for use in the transportation and storage of detonators
according to any of the preceding claims which further comprises at least

one outer wall which is radially spaced about the first wall, each pair of
adjacent walls defining a space.
7. A method of packaging detonator assemblies in a packing case, each
detonator assembly comprising an initiation means and detonator wherein
the detonator is located in the protector of any of the preceding claims and
wherein the protector enclosed detonators are placed on either side of an
insert in a packing case.
8. A method of packaging using the protector of any of claims 1 to 6 wherein
protectors are placed in a storage container in alternate packing rows such
that no protector is located directly in alignment with other protectors in
the rows above or below.
9. A method of packaging according to claim 8 wherein at least two
protectors are joined together to form a set of protectors.
10. A detonator protector substantially as herein described with reference to
the Figures.
11. A method of packaging detonators substantially as herein described with
reference to the Figures.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


` 2139793
ICIA 1549
DETONATOR PROTECTOR
The present invention relates to a protector for detonators and a method
of packaging detonators for transport and storage.
Detonators may be broadly divided into two types, either electric or non-
5 electric, depending on the manner in which they are initiated. When detonatorsare attached to an initiation means such as electric leg-wires or signal tubing, the
assembled unit is commonly termed a detonator assembly.
Electric detonators generally have a fusehead within the detonator shell,
the fusehead being initiated by electric current transmitted along the legwires.10 Non-electric detonators are commonly attached to a length of signal tubing, which
comprises plastic tubing, lightly coated on the inside with a reactive powder which
is capable of transmitting a shock wave to the detonator and thus initiating it.
While many different types of detonators exist, those used for civilian
purposes generally comprise only a delay element (which is optional), a priming
15 charge and a base charge which are enclosed within a metal shell. When an
initi~ting shock wave or electric current is transmitted to the detonator, the delay
element burns, then the priming charge is initiated and finally the base charge in
the closed end of the detonator shell explodes.
The storage and transport of dangerous goods such as detonators and
20 detonator assemblies generally requires licenses and is regulated by law in almost
all countries. Often manufacturers and large mine sites need to store hundreds of
detonators in their maga_ines. Statutory requirements usually dictate many
parameters such as the material of construction of the m~g~7ine, type of lightning
protection, security standards and the lllinilllulll distances of the m~g~7ine from
25 other constructions.
Detonators are often transported from one site to another in specially
marked and fitted trucks which are exclusively dedicated to the transportation of
explosives. Depending on local law, these trucks may be limited in the quantities

`- 2139793
of detonators carried, the times of travel on public roads and the number of
escort vehicles required.
Legislation in most countries includes such specific requirements for the
transportation of explosives to try and ",i~ e the likelihood of initiation of a5 detonator in transit. Such events can have many causes including mishandling,
lightning strike or road accident. Most countries base their legislative
requirements for storage and transportation of explosives on the
"Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods" issued by the United
- Nations plus the United Nations' prescribed testing codes for establishing the
acceptability of various pack~ging and transportation methods for dangerous
goods.
With respect to the transportation and storage of detonators, the United
Nations' 1.4B Code of testing is generally accepted as the relevant criteria. Ingeneral it is preferable that when detonators are packed together for storage and
transport, inadvertent initiation of one detonator will not lead to mass initiation of
other detonators. In other words, compliance at least in part with the followingcriteria is preferable;
1. initiation of a single detonator in a box of assemblies will not cause the
instantaneous initiation of a ~ignifir~nt number of other units (sometimes
referred to as the "Case Test") and
2. if a box of assemblies is burnt, initiation of an individual unit will not cause
instantaneous initiation of a significant number of other units (sometimes
lefel,cd to as the "Bonfire Test").
To achieve the first objective the p~cl~ging must necessarily pre~ellt a
25 detonator from initiating either the base charge or the initiation tubing of a
significant number of other detonators in the bonfire test. With respect to non-electric detonator assemblies, initiation tube (which is generally made of plastic)
will melt and become non-functional before the temperature of the fire is high

` ~13979~
,
enough within the detonator to cause thermal initiation. Hence direct initiation of
detonators by shrapnel and shock is the major incident to consider.
When an unprotected deton~tor is initiated, the majority of shrapnel occurs
in two distinct areas. The first is in a ring that flows out from near the top of the
5 detonator base charge and the second is in the form of a slug emitted axially from
the bottom of the detonator. In air, radial shrapnel can cause initiation of an
adjacent detonator at 120 mm separation and the axial shrapnel can cause
initiation at least up to 300 mm separation. In other, low shrapnel areas,
initiation of a receptor detonator appears to be of the order of S0 mm.
Various attempts have been made in the past to minimi~e the likelihood of
cross propagation of detonators whilst maintaining a practical packing density.
For example, polystyrene packages have been approved by the UK and Australian
authorities for the transport of detonators colllplisillg No.8* delay elements (with
no initiation tubing). These packages essentially consisted of a poly~ly.elle lid and
15 top which included cavities into which the detonators were laid 'top to tail'. The
separation between the base charges of the detonators was about S0 mm and the
package had overall dimensions of a~r~ tely 300 x lS0 x 30 mm. Huwc;~el
this type of packaging was not commercially practical for non-electric detonatorassemblies as it would lead to uneconomic p~ckine density.
UK and Australian authorities have also approved a method of p~ n~
electric detonators having long lead wires which method consisted of forming thelead wires into a "figure 8" coil and locating the detonator as far as possible inside
the wire bundle. While this concept can be applied to electric detonators it is not
suitable for non-electric detonators fitted with signal tube as the signal tube is an
active component of the assembly.
In another attempt to provide a method of safe transportation of
detonators, No.8 detonators with no initiation tubing attached have been stored in
packages or blocks constructed of compressed paper. These packages are
appru~ ately 290 x S0 x 20 mm and holes 11 mm in diameter are drilled through

/ 21397~9
the block in a pattern on 30 mm centres. The bottom of the block has a
cardboard sheet stapled on and the top is covered with a cardboard sheet into
which crosses are cut to line up with each hole. This allows the detonators to be
pushed into the holes and be retained in place.
In yet another attempt to provide a safe transportation holder and package
for detonators US Patent No. 5,133,258 discloses the use of a holder having an
internal cavity and surrounded by concentric, cylindrical elastomeric walls which
are spaced radially from one another by concentric cylindrical spaces or air gaps.
In use, the detonator shell is flush with the walls of the cavity and this snug fit is
sufflcient to prevent the holder falling off the detonator.
It has now been found that detonators may be packaged in such a manner
as to reduce the likelihood of detonator to detonator propagation of an explosion.
This is primarily achieved by providing a free volume around the base charge of
the detonator to allow for initial eYpan~ion of the products of a detonation .
The cullenl invention therefore provides a protector for use in the
transportation and storage of detonators conl~lisillg,
a detonator holder which is open at one end for insertion of a detonator
and closed at the other end, and which radially encloses the base charge of
said detonator,
at least one detonator retaining means integral with the detonator holder,
and
a first wall which is radially spaced around the holder, and wherein the
holder and wall define a space,
wherein in use, the detonator retaining means holds the detonator within
the holder such that a free volume is provided around the base charge of the
detonator.

213979~
~,
There is further provided a method of pacl~ging detonator assemblies by
inserting detonators in the protector of the current invention and placing the
protected detonators on either side of an insert in a packing case such that thedetonators point away from the detonator initiation means. Using this p~ ein~
5 method the shrapnel and shock waves from an exploding base charge is unlikely
to impinge upon the initiation means of the detonator assemblies.
Where the initiation means is signal tubing it is important that the
detonators are positioned such that if one detonator explodes it will not cause a
shock front to pass along the signal tubing of neighbouring assemblies and initiate
10 their attached detonators. While this packing arrangement can also be used for
electric detonators, the packing arrangement is clearly not critical because no
matter how close a detonator explodes to leg-wires, the detonation will not cause
any flow of electric current in the leg-wires.
The protector of the cullenl invention provides for a free volume around
15 the base charge of the detonator and this free volume may optionally extend
along the entire length of the detonator shell.
The protector may optionally colllplise at least one outer wall which is
radially spaced about the first wall, each pair of adjacent walls defining a space.
In a particularly preferred embodiment the protector of the current invention
20 comprises one outer wall and the protector is constructed of high density
polyethylene (HDPE). The provision of a free volume around the detonator, an
outer wall and the use of HDPE as con~lluction material has been found to be
particularly advantageous. Using this embodiment of the protector, number 8*
detonators (which col~lise 780 milligrams of p~ le~ylhlilol tetranitrate, PETN)
25 may be packed with an inter-detonator spacing of as little as 2 centimetres before
a shock front from one detonator will initiate neighbouring detonators. Where noouter wall is provided the minimum inter-detonator spacing is 3.5 centimetres.

` 2139799
.~
The detonator relail~ing means may COlllpliSC any collveniently configured
projections on the interior of the holder. Fins extending the length of the interior
of the holder are particularly pre~lled.
The protector of the current invention may be used as an independent unit
5 or two or more may be joined together or manufactured together to form a set.
The protectors may be joined together by any col,~enient means such as stirking,heat welding or solvent welding protectors. Altelnalively a single moulding or
similar process may be used to form a set. Where the material of construction isan elastomeric substance the individual protectors may be joined by a web of the10 elastomer. Using sets of several protectors joined together may be advantageous
where illlploved packing density is required.
It is particularly l~refelled that the individual protectors or sets be located
in alternate packing rows. Where used herein the term "alternate packing rows"
refers to the packing in which no protector is located directly in alignment with
15 other protectors in the rows above or below. In a plefelled embodiment the
protectors are packed in storage containers such as cardboard boxes or the like,by arranging a base layer of units in a close packed or square packed array, then
placing a second layer of inverted units such that they fill or point towards the
interstitial spaces of the base layer. A third layer of units repeats the
20 arrangement of the base layer and a forth layer repeats the arrangement of the
second layer.
With this p~çking arrangement there is a low probability that one
detonator may be located in direct alignment with a second unit and that the
second unit could be initiated. However, whilst two units could fire, propagation
25 to further units is unlikely.
This method of packaging is particularly useful for detonators without
attached initiation means. Various packing densities can be obtained depending
on various parameters including the size of the detonator, the configuration of the

~139799
_`
protector, the dimensions of the packing case and the method of packaging of the~;ullellt invention.
The ~;ullellt invention will now be described with refelellce to the drawings
in which Figure 1 shows sectional views of one embodiment of the protector;
5 Figure 2 depicts a plan view of an array of protectors; Figure 3 shows a sectional
view along BB' of Figure 2; Figure 4 is a perspective view of detonator assemblies
in a p~cl~gine case.
Figure l(a) clearly shows a cylindrical detonator holder (1) having an open
end (la) and a closed end (lb) within which is located a detonator retaining
10 means compli~ g several fins (2) which are integral with the interior of the
detonator holder. A wall (3) is radially spaced around the holder and the holderand wall define a space (4). The top of the wall and the holder form a junction
(5)-
Figure l(b) is a cross sectional view along AA' of Figure l(a) and shows
15 the wall (3), the holder (1) and the fins (2). In use a detonator would be pushed
into the holder and held in place by the fins, the space between the detonator
shell and the holder forming a free volume.
Figure 2 depicts a set of individual protectors (6) held together by a web of
material (7) to form an array. Where the protectors are constructed of plastic,
20 the entire array could be formed by a single injection moulding process with a
web of the plastic joining individual protectors. In use detonator shells would be
placed in the holders (1), the tops of the detonator shells projecting above thetops of the protectors. When another set of protectors is placed on top of the
first, the tops of the detonator shells would be located in the interstitial space (8).
Figure 3 is a cross sectional view along BB' of Figure 2 with detonators
inserted in the protectors. The detonators are depicted in cross section to showeach base charge (9a), priming charge (9b) and delay element (9c) located withineach detonator shell (9d).

. . 213979g
-
Figure 4 depicts detonator assemblies packed in a box (10) using a
prefel,~d p~ ging method. The box includes an insert (11) about which the
detonator assemblies (12) are packed. The initiation means (12b) of each
assembly is formed into a loop and each detonator (12a) is located in a protector
5 (13)-
Bundles of detonator assemblies are held together by a rubber band(12c) located around their looped initiation means. As shown in the diagram,
bundles of detonator assemblies are packed with their detonators on alternate
sides of the insert, the detonators pointing away from the loops of initiation
1 0 means.
While the invention has been explained in relation to its ~lefelled
embodiments it is to be understood that various modifications thereof will become
apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. Therefore, it is
to be understood that the invention disclosed herein is intended to cover such
15 modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-01-09
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2003-01-09
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-01-09
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2002-01-09
Letter Sent 2000-11-22
Letter Sent 2000-11-22
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2000-01-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-07-15

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-01-09

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-12-29

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1998-01-20 1997-12-17
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1999-01-11 1998-12-18
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2000-01-10 1999-12-31
Registration of a document 2000-01-27
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2001-01-09 2000-12-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ORICA EXPLOSIVES TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD.
Past Owners on Record
JOHN THOMAS HEDGER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-07-12 1 7
Cover Page 1995-09-06 1 13
Abstract 1995-07-14 1 16
Description 1995-07-14 8 365
Claims 1995-07-14 2 58
Drawings 1995-07-14 4 78
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-09-10 1 129
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-02-05 1 182
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2002-02-19 1 172
Fees 1997-01-07 1 47