Language selection

Search

Patent 2141302 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2141302
(54) English Title: A PROCESS FOR THE CONDITIONING OF FLUE GASES
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR LE CONDITIONNEMENT DES GAZ DE CARNEAU
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 51/10 (2006.01)
  • B01D 1/18 (2006.01)
  • B01D 53/34 (2006.01)
  • B01D 53/60 (2006.01)
  • B01D 53/68 (2006.01)
  • F23J 15/00 (2006.01)
  • F23J 15/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KERSTING, MATHIAS (Germany)
  • MENSING, ANDREAS (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • NOELL-KRC UMWELTTECHNIK GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • NOELL-KRC UMWELTTECHNIK GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1993-07-28
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-02-17
Examination requested: 2000-07-27
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1993/001998
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1994003261
(85) National Entry: 1995-01-27

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 42 25 739.5 (Germany) 1992-08-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process for the conditioning of flue gases polluted with
solids, particularly from incinerating plants, for subsequent
flue gas purification, preferably with dry additives, by spraying
water into the gas stream, wherein said water is sprayed into the
gas stream through a preceding spray drying installation, prefer-
ably having a rotating atomizer.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 6 -
C l a i m s :
1. A process for the conditioning of flue gases from inciner-
ating plants polluted with solids for subsequent flue gas
purification with dry additives by spraying water into the
gas stream, characterized in that said water is sprayed
into the gas stream through a spray drying installation
having a rotating atomizer.
2. The use of spray drying installations having a rotating
atomizer for the conditioning of flue gases from incinerat-
ing plants polluted with solids for subsequent flue gas
purification with dry additives, for spraying water into
the gas stream.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ 2141302
SMB
A Process for the Conditioning of Flue Gases
The object of the present invention is a process for the con-
ditioning of flue gases polluted with solids, particularly from
incinerating plants, for subsequent flue gas purification,
preferably with dry additives, by spraying water into the gas
stream.
For the purification of flue gases, it is necessary in general
to condition the flue gas in terms of temperature and steam con-
tent. In wet flue gas purification processes, for instance, this
conditioning takes place in a quencher. For the purification of
flue gases with dry additives, water is conventionally sprayed
into the flue gas stream by means of spray lances. Subsequent
~lue gas purification with dry additives then causes elimination
of acidic components, such as HCl, HF, SO2, and NOx. If the flue
gases are polluted by solids, the latter are considerably en-
riched in the quencher and thus channeled out of the process. In
the flue gas purification with dry additives, the solid impur-
ities are channeled out of the process and hence removed from the
flue gas along with the dry additives. If the flue gases are
conditioned by spraying in water by means of spray lances, high
solids pollutions result in undesirable and obtrusive sticking
and caking which may also interfere with the subsequent purifica-
tion with dry additives. Such sticking and caking is observed in
particular in cases when spraying of the water is done in an
uneven manner and larger droplets get into the flue gas stream
as well in addition to fine mists.
Unsufficient conditioning of the flue gases will result in un-
sufficient purification. Overdosing of the water will result in

2141302
-- 2
sticking and caking of the solids present in the flue gas and in
addition can cause the dry additives to cake as well.
The object of the invention is to provide a process for the
conditioning of flue gases polluted with solids, particularly
from incinerating plants, for subsequent flue gas purification,
which process will avoid the observed obstructions especially in
the flue gas purification with dry additives, and still to ensure
good and even conditioning which can be readily controlled.
This problem can be solved surprisingly well by spraying the
water into the gas stream through a preceding spray drying
installation, preferably having a rotating atomizer.
To date, spray drying installations have been used uniquely to
dry solutions or dispersions of solids. Spray drying is a
relatively tedious but gentle drying method and therefore is used
primarily to dry temperature sensitive solids of high quality.
In addition, spray drying installations have also been used
already for quasi-dry flue gas purification by spraying solutions
or dispersions of absorbing agents with water. At the end of the
spray tower, a newly dried absorbing agent was then separated
which additionally contains the impurities of the flue gas that
are to be removed. However, spray drying installations have not
been used to date to condition flue gases, because the require-
ments with respect to instruments and process engineering seemed
much too high. Surprisingly, it has now been found, however, that
sticking and caking can be avoided with flue gases polluted with
solids, particularly from incinerating plants, while still allow-
ing a perfect, reproducable conditioning which can be readily
controlled.
The subsequent flue gas purification can then be performed, for
instance, by spraying in dry additives. In particular, alkali
metal and alcaline earth metal hydroxides can be considered for
the purification of flue gas. However, other absorbing agents,
especially active charcoal, can be used as well as dry additives.

2l~l3n2
In principle, it is also possible, of course, to condition flue
gases polluted with solids, particularly from incinerating
plants, according to the invention and then to add dry additives
thereto and optionally to further subject them to wet purifica-
tion. Thereby it is possible to separate the solids of the flue
gas from the flue gas in a dry form.
In case of spray drying installations, in principle all spray
drying installations can be used that are conventionally used for
spray drying and especially for flue gas purification. Prefera-
bly, spray drying installations with rotating atomizers are
employed, since they allow for a particularly good and even
distribution of the liquid phase in the gas stream.
Spray drying installations with rotating spray atomizers have
originally been developed for the recovery of milk powder, but
are employed to a considerable extent for quasi-dry flue gas
purification as well. With flue gases polluted with solids,
particularly from incinerating plants, however, this method can
lead to obstructions and unsatisfactory results.
Hence, an object of the present invention is first a process for
the conditioning of flue gases polluted with solids, particularly
from incinerating plants, for subsequent flue gas purification,
preferably with dry additives, by spraying water into the gas
stream, characterized in that the water is sprayed into the gas
stream through a preceding spray drying installation, preferably
having a rotating atomizer. A further object of the invention is
the use of spray drying installations for the conditioning of
flue gases polluted with solids, particularly from incinerating
plants, for subsequent flue gas purification, preferably with dry
additives, by spraying water into the gas stream.
Preferably, spray drying installations with rotating atomizers
are employed.

~ 21~1302
-- 4
The subsequent flue gas purification, for instance by blowing in
dry alkali metal and alcaline earth metal hydroxides, is rendered
substantially more reliable and efficient according to the
invention.
The seemingly excessively high requirements of a spray drying
installation with respect to instruments and process engineering
just for the conditioning of the flue gases eventually leads to
such improved results, however, that the overall plant works
better and more economically.
A critical advantage is the improved security of the process, for
it works in a more flexible way when more or less water is
required or when more or less water is supplied. There is no
sudden break but rather a slow increasing or decreasing of the
amount of water supplied which is introduced in the flue gas.
Therefore, it is also easier for the process to be controlled.
Spray lances tend to get obstructed and thereby to suddenly
interrupt the water supply. This results in severe obstructions
of the process.
A typical spray drying installation which can also be used for
abrasive aqueous liquids is described in U.S. Patent 4,530,822
and is sold, for instance, by the firm of NIRO. These installa-
tions can be used for the present invention as well.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2141302 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Dead - Final fee not paid 2004-05-26
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2004-05-26
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-07-28
Deemed Abandoned - Conditions for Grant Determined Not Compliant 2003-05-26
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-11-26
Letter Sent 2002-11-26
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2002-11-26
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-11-13
Letter Sent 2002-07-30
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2002-07-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-07-30
Letter Sent 2000-11-10
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2000-10-26
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-09-08
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2000-08-15
Letter Sent 2000-08-15
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2000-08-15
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-07-28
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2000-07-27
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-07-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-07-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1994-02-17

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-07-28
2003-05-26
2001-07-30
2000-07-28

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-07-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1997-07-28 1997-07-25
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1998-07-28 1998-06-15
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1999-07-28 1999-07-13
Request for examination - standard 2000-07-27
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2000-07-28 2000-10-26
Reinstatement 2000-10-26
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2001-07-30 2002-07-17
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2002-07-29 2002-07-17
Reinstatement 2002-07-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NOELL-KRC UMWELTTECHNIK GMBH
Past Owners on Record
ANDREAS MENSING
MATHIAS KERSTING
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1995-09-08 1 19
Abstract 1994-02-17 1 13
Description 1994-02-17 4 187
Claims 1994-02-17 1 17
Claims 2000-08-29 1 18
Description 2000-07-27 5 198
Reminder - Request for Examination 2000-03-29 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2000-08-15 1 178
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2000-08-28 1 184
Notice of Reinstatement 2000-11-10 1 171
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-08-27 1 185
Notice of Reinstatement 2002-07-30 1 170
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2002-11-26 1 160
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-08-25 1 176
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (NOA) 2003-08-04 1 167
PCT 1995-01-27 32 1,107
Fees 2002-07-17 1 39
Fees 2000-10-26 1 37
Fees 1995-06-27 1 70
Fees 1996-07-10 1 56