Language selection

Search

Patent 2167513 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2167513
(54) English Title: HIGH CONCENTRATED, SOLID MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE AND CHLORMEQUAT CHLORIDE PRODUCTS
(54) French Title: MEPIQUAT-CHLORURE FORTEMENT CONCENTRE ET PRODUITS A BASE DE MEPIQUAT-CHLORURE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 43/40 (2006.01)
  • A01N 25/12 (2006.01)
  • A01N 33/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • JAGER, KARL-FRIEDRICH (Germany)
  • KILBRIDE, TERENCE, JR. (United States of America)
  • LISA, RUDOLPH ERNEST (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BASF CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • BASF CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1994-07-09
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-02-02
Examination requested: 2001-07-03
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1994/002253
(87) International Publication Number: EP1994002253
(85) National Entry: 1996-01-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/095,122 (United States of America) 1993-07-20

Abstracts

English Abstract


The present invention provides hygroscopic plant growth regulator formulations in solid forms and associated methods of making
the powders and tablets. The most preferred formulation uses an effective amount of an N,N-dimethyl-piperidinium and/or N,N-
dimethylammonium salt.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des formulations de régulateurs de croissance hygroscopiques pour végétaux sous formes solides et des procédés associés de production de ces poudres et comprimés. Une formulation particulièrement préférée fait appel à une dose efficace de sel de N,N-diméthylpiperidinium et/ou de N,N-diméthylammonium.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A plant growth regulator formulation in solid form comprising
a synthetic amorphous silicon dioxide hydrate and an effec-
tive amount of 1,1-dimethylpiperidinium chloride wherein the
weight of the synthetic amorphous silicon dioxide hydrate per
weight of 1,1-dimethylpiperidinium chloride is about
0.2 : 100 to 3 : 100.
2. A method of making a plant growth regulator formulation as
claimed in claim 1, using a spray drier comprising:
(i) drying 1,1-dimethylpiperidinium chloride and
(ii) mixing an effective amount of the synthetic amorphous
silicon dioxide hydrate.
3. A method of making a plant growth regulator formulation as
claimed in claim 1, using a spray drier comprising:
(i) injecting an aqueous feed solution of 1,1-dimethyl-
piperidinium chloride into said spray drier at a
controlled rate; and
(ii) injecting the synthetic amorphous silicon dioxide hy-
drate into the inlet air stream of said spray drier
at a controlled rate.
4. A method of making a plant growth regulator formulation as
claimed in claim 1, using a double drum drier comprising:
(i) charging an aqueous feed solution of 1,1-dimethyl-
piperidinium chloride into said double drum drier
with interior pressurizing means and scraping means,
at a continuous rate;
(ii) rotating each drum of said double drum drier toward
the other;
(iii) removing the solid film formed on the interior drum
surface by scraping means.

5. A method of making a plant growth regulator formulation as
claimed in claim 1, using a batch vacuum drier comprising:
(i) charging aqueous feed solution of 1,1-dimethyl-
piperidinium chloride into said batch vacuum drier
with chopping means, agitation means and steam
jacket, at a controlled rate;
(ii) applying steam to said jacket;
(iii) applying a vacuum to said batch vacuum drier by a
vacuum means;
(iv) agitating said aqueous feed solution in said batch
vacuum drier;
(v) evaporating the water from said aqueous feed solu-
tion; and
(vi) pulverizing the paste formed in step (v) by chopping.
6. A powder formed by one of the methods of claims 2 to 5.
7. A tablet formed from the powder of claim 6.
8. A water soluble bag comprising the powder of claim 6.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ W095/02963 2 1 6 7 5 1 3 PCT~P94/02253
High Concentrated, Solid Mepiquat Chloride and ChlormequatChloride Products
5 Description
The present invention relates to methods for making flowable,
highLy concentrated powders and tablets of hygroscopic plant
growth regulator compounds, and more specifically to processes to
10 dry mepiquat chloride and chlormequat chloride aqueous solutions
to form flowable highly concentrated solid products.
Plant growth regulators affect the physiology of plant growth and
influence the natural rhythm of a plant. More specifically, plant
15 growth regulators may, for example, reduce plant height, stimu-
late seed germin~tion~ induce flow~ring, promote or inhibit fog,
darken leaf coloring, mln;mlze lodging of cereals, slow grass
growth on lawns, reduce boll rot and provide better boll reten-
tion in cotton.
Plant growth regulators may be applied to plants in a variety of
methods including different formulations. Of these various
methods, use of liquid and dry compositions are the most common.
The particular formulation desired and resulting efficacy enhan-
25 cement will greatly depend upon the species to be treated, envi-
ronmental conditions, the geographical area and the climatology
of the area at the time of treatment.
The plant growth regulator, known trivially as mepiquat chloride,
30 is generally used to control various aspects of cotton boll
growth. See, for example, Khafaga, Angew. Botanik 57, 257-265
(1983); Sawan et al., J. Agronomy & Plant Science, 154, 120-128
tl985); U.S. Patents 3,905,798 and 4,447,255; and "The Pesticide
Manual", 9th Edition, The British Crop Protection Council,
35 Farnham, Surrey, Great Britain, Entry No. 7920.
The plant growth regulator, known trivially as chlormequat chlo-
ride, is generally used to reduce lodging of cereals (cf. "The
Pesticide Manual", 9th Edition, The British Crop Protection Coun-
40 cil, Farnham, Surrey, Great Britain, Entry No. 2420).
Mepiquat chloride and chlormequat chloride are used as plantgrowth regulators in agriculture. Mepiquat chloride and chlorme-
quat chloride have high water solubilities of more than 1 kg/L at
45 20C. The melting point of mepiquat chloride is 223C, chlorme-
quate chloride begins to decompose at 210C.

WO 95/029~ 2 1 6 7 5 1 3 PCT~P94102253
Both substances are very hygroscopic, readily absorbing moisture
from humid air, so much so, that the dry powders can turn to li-
quid when exposed to ambient humid air. During storage, the solid
mepiquat chloride or chlormequat chloride is strongly caking and
5 sticking to container surfaces, even at low residual water con-
tents of less than 0.5 wt.-%.
These properties make it extremely difficult to dry mepiquat
chloride or chlormequat chloride. In conventional spray dryers,
lO the material is very difficult to dry. It must be atomized extre-
mely finely to reduce the mois~ure to a suitable level and even
then it retains too much water to dry practically. The product
rem~; ns sticky and adheres to the walls of the dryer and the
dryer ducts and cyclones, eventually plugging the ducts and cy-
l5 clones. Furthermore, powder from such a process, because it is sofine, flows poorly out of the dryer, and upon storage in a drum,
is rendered unflowable due to caking.
Solid forms of plant growth regulators offer a number of key ad-
20 vantages, including convenience, increased stability and shelf
life, as well as reduced packaging, storage and shipping costs.
Additionally, there is the possibility of future government regu-
lation requiring solid forms of agricultural products in order to
25 reduce hA~ ng of contaminated packaging of these products du-
ring field application and during disposal. These dry flowable
plant growth regulating compounds would be safer for the farmer
to use and dispose of, and also result in a smaller volume of ha-
zardous waste being produced.
There is a need for dry, flowable, highly concentrated powder and
tablet formulations of hygroscopic plant growth regulators.
Surprisingly, free-flowing, non-caking solid mepiquat chloride
35 and chlormequat chloride formulations can be achieved by mixing
the solid hygroscopic plant ~-owth regulator with finely divided,
highly absorptive ine-_s. In such mixtures, concentrations of the
plant growth resulator of up to about 99 wt.-% are achievable.
When the mixtures of the invention are directly applied in a
40 spray tank, the plant growth regulator dissolves instantly in the
water without residues.
The preferred plant growth regulators of the present invention
include the group consisting of l,l-dimethyl-3,4-dehydro-
45 piperidinium bromide, 4-chloro-l,l-dimethyl piperidinium bromide,
l,l-dimethylhexahydropyridazinium bromide, and l,l-dimethyl-
piperidinium chloride, also known as mepiquat chloride and

W095/029~ 2 1 ~ ~ 5 ~ 3 PCT~P94102253
2-chloroethyltrimethylammonium chloride, also known as chlorme-
quat chloride.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an agricultu-
5 rally acceptable hygroscopic plant growth regulator formulation
in a solid form.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide
methods of making the solid form of hygroscopic plant growth re-
lO gulator compositions of the present invention.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an agri-
culturally acceptable hygroscopic plant growth regulator
formulation in the form of a tablet.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide
methods of m~kl ng the dry, flowable tablet form of hygroscopic
plant growth regulator compositions of the present invention.
20 These and other objects of the present invention will be more
fully understood from the following description of the invention.
Figure l illustrates a spray dryer used in a method of the pre-
sent invention.
2S
Figure 2 illustrates a double drum dryer used in a method of the
present invention.
Figure 3 illustrates a batch vacuum dryer used in a method of the
30 present invention.
As used herein, the term "agriculturally acceptable" includes
agricultural, industrial and residential use.
35 As used herein, "plant growth regulator(s)" (hereinafter abbre-
viated as "PGR") or "regulation" includes the following plant
responses: inhibition of cell elongation, for example reduction
in stem height and internodal distance, strengthening of the stem
wall, thus increasing the resistance to lodging; compact growth
40 in ornamentals for the economic production of improved quality
plants; promotion of better fruiting; increasing the number of
ovaries with a view to stepping up yield; promotion of senescence
of the formation of tissue enabling fruit to absciss; defoliation
of nursery and ornamental bushes and trees for mail-order busi-
45 ness in the fall; defoliation of trees to interrupt parasiticchains of infection; hastening of ripening, with a view to pro-

WO 95/02963 2 1 6 7 5 1 3 PCT~P94/02253
gr~mm; ng the harvest by reducing the harvest to one to two pik-
kings and interrupting the food-chain for injurious insects.
.
As used herein, PGR formulations of the present invention may be
5 used to form both package and tank mix compositions.
The present preferred invention comprises PGR compositions com-
prising an agriculturally and plant growth regulating effective
amount of a hygroscopic PGR, and more preferably, an N,N-dime-
10 thylpiperidinium or N,N-dimethylammonium salt in a dry flowable
highly concentrated powder.
Preferred PGRs include salts of the formula:
lS A A
N~ X~
/\
H3C R
where R is methyl or ethyl; X is the anion of an inorganic or
organic, but not phytotoxic acid, preferably bromide or chloride,
and the groups A independently denote methyl, ethyl or propyl
which independently may be substituted by chloro or bromo, or the
25 groups A together denote a chain of 4 or 5 methylene groups,
which chain may be substituted by chloro, bromo, methyl, chloro-
methyl, bromomethyl, hydroxymethyl, and methylene, or which chain
cont~; n; n~ one or two double bonds, or A is the chain ~(CH2)n-NH-,
where n is 3 or 4, disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,~05,798 and hereby
30 incorporated by reference.
Preferred specific examples of PGRs include 1,1-dimethyl-3,4-de-
hydro-piperidinium bromide, 4-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium
bromide, l,l-dimethylhexahydropyridazinium bromide, l,l-dimethyl-
35 piperidinium chloride and 2-chloroethyltrimethylammonium chlo-
ride.
The most preferred plant growth regulators are l,l-dimethyl-pipe-
ridinium chloride, also known as N,N-dimethylpiperidinium chlo-
40 ride or mepiquat chloride, which is commercially available underthe registered trademark Pix~ (BASF AG, Germany) and 2-chloroe-
thyltrimethylammonium chloride or chlormequat chloride, which is
commercially available under the registered tr~pm~rk Cycocel~
(BASF AG, Germany).

W095l02963 ~ 5 ~ 3 PCT~P94/02253
For convenience of description, mepiquat chloride will be used.
However, the methods described apply equally to other hygroscopic
PGRs, especially to chlormequat chloride.
5 In a preferred embodiment, silica is injected in the inlet air
stream of a spray dryer at a controlled rate.
A spray dryer of the type illustrated in Figure 1 may be used. As
can be shown from Figure 1, the aqueous PGR feed solution is agi-
10 tated in a feed tank (2) and fed through a line (4) via a feedpump (6) into the spray dryer unit (8). The aqueous PGR feed so-
lution is introduced into the spray dryer unit by an atomizing
means (10). An inlet air heating means (12) provides heat to the
dryer at a temperature of about 150 to about 250C.
A flow aid such as silica is stored in a feed hopper (14) and in-
jected into the spray dryer unit (8) via a screw feeder (16)
throu~h a line by an air eductor (18).
20 The silica adheres to the forming droplets or partially dried
particles formed by the aqueous mepiquat chloride feed solution
in the vicinity of the atomizer (10) and reduces or eliminAtes
the tendency of the partially dried mepiquat chloride particles
to stick to the spray drying unit walls (20, 22), the ducts (24),
25 and the cyclone (26). The silica also renders the powder more
flowable, el ;m; n~ting caking in the drum even when stored for
long periods of time provided the drum excludes ambient moist
air. The flowing powder is then suitable for commercial tablet-
ting or for filling water soluble bags, e.g. made of polyvinyl
30 alcohol (PVA) films and marketed under tr~m~rks as Monosol
M7030~ or Monosol M8532~.
The rate at which the aqueous PGR feed solution is fed into the
spray dryer unit is not critical and is dependent upon the size
35 of the spray dryer used. This rate is easily determined by those
skilled in the art.
A preferred method dries the mepiquat chloride solution with a
double drum dryer as illustrated in Figure 2. The double drum
40 dryer has a pair of hollow, rotating drums (28, 30) whose
surfaces are scraped by a knife (32). High pressure steam is in-
troduced to the interior of the drums and mepiquat chloride solu-
tion added continuously via a feed line (34) to the nip between
the drums (36). The drums turn toward one another, by means of a
45 conveyor, for example 38 depositing a portion of the liquid, boi-
ling mepiquat chloride solution on the drum surface (28, 30)
where boiling is initiated. Upon further rotation, the thin film

WO 95/02963 ~ 1 b 7 ~ 1 ~ PCT~ W4/02253
of mepiquat chloride's water boils off into the vapor hood (40)
and a solid film rem~lnq that is scraped by sharp knife (32) from
the turning drum surface (28,30). The material is then collected
and the flow aid is added to it to improve flowability and impart
S anti-caking properties prior to tabletting or filling water solu-
ble bags.
The plant growth regulator feed solution is preferably charged
into the double drum dryer at a rate of about 5 gm/min. to about
10 200 gm/min. per square foot (about 9.3 dm2) of heated surface and
the aqueous plant growth regulator is preferably charged into the
double drum dryer into the nip between the drums.
A preferred embodiment of the drying process utilizes a batch va-
lS cuum dryer with chopping blades which can also be described as a
mechanical fluid bed. The most preferred batch vacuum dryer is a
Littleford~ type (or ~odige) vacuum dryer, as illustrated in Fi-
gure 3.
20 As is seen from Figure 3, the vacuum dryer unit (52) consists of
double jacket (42, 44). Inside the double jacket is a hollow ro-
tating shaft (46) with attached plough shaped m;x;ng elements
(48).
25 Aqueous PGR feed solution is fed via a line (50) into the vacuum
dryer unit (52). Steam or hot water (54) is fed via a line (56)
into a jacket (42) which surrounds the vacuum dryer unit (52),
and optionally through the hollow rotating shaft (46). Agitating
means (57) in the interior o~ the vacuum dryer unit t52) agitates
30 the aqueous PGR feed solution. A vacuum means (58), which may be
a pump or vacuum jet unit is introduced into and applied to the
vacuum dryer unit (52). The vacuum and applied jacket heat causes
the evaporation of the water from the aqueous PGR feed solution.
The evaporated water boils up, passes through a bag collector
35 means (60), and is recovered by a condenser (62) and collected in
a condensate tank (64).
When a sufficient amount of water has been evaporated, a paste
begins to form. Mixing elements (48) are used to divide the pa-
40 ste, breaking it up, and bringing the interior moisture to thesurface so as to expose it to the vacuum to increase the drying
rate. As the material solidifies, the chopping means breaks the
material into small particles to maintain the high drying rate.
45 A free-flowing, non-cAk;ng solid mepiquat chloride formulation
can be achieved by mixing the solid mepiquat chloride with a fi-
nely divided, highly absorptive inert flow aid such as silica.

WO9~/029~ 2 1 6 ~ ~ ~ 3 PCT~P94/02253
The addition of silica or other flow aid renders the powder flo-
wable and non-caking, and suitable for tabletting or filling
water soluble bags. The flow aid is introduced manually or mecha-
nically through a port on or near the top of the drying chamber.
All three drying processes use silica or other flow aid to im-
prove flowability and prevent caking. These inert additives inc-
lude any form of silica including fumed silicas, precipitated si-
licas, aluminum silicates, magnesium silicates, and the like,
10 zeolites, bentoinites, montmorillonites, and attapulgites and
mixtures thereof. The most preferred silica is commercially avai-
lable as Sipernat~ 50S, which is a synthetic amorphous silicon
dioxide hydrate.
15 The weight of silica per weight of mepiquat chloride in all of
these drying processes is about 0.2:100 to 3:100, and more parti-
cularly, about 2:100.
Optionally, to further improve flowability, reduce sticking ten-
20 dency or caking, or to increase the dissolution rate, binders,
fillers, and/or disintegrants can be dissolved in the feed solu-
tion before drying.
Suitable binders, fillers, and/or disintegrants include water-so-
25 luble cellulose derivatives, cellulose derivatives, carboxymethyl
cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, water soluble gums such
as gum arabic, gum tragacanth, alginates, gelatin, and polyvinyl-
pyrollidone, cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone, microcryst~ll;ne
cellulose, modified starches such as sodium carboxymethyl starch,
30 and mixtures thereof.
~referred binders, fillers, and/or disintegrants are carboxy-
methyl cellulose.
35 Other suitable fillers, binders, and/or disintegrants include any
water soluble starch, corn syrup, dextrin or pregelatinized
starch which is at least partially soluble in water at ambient
temperature. For example, there can be used as a binder the pre-
gelatinized, modified and stabilized waxy maize starch which is
40 marketed by the National Starch and Chemical Corporation under
the trade name Instant Celar Gel~. In addition, pregelatinized
corn starch marketed by the Hubinger Company under the trade name
OK Pre-Gel~ can be used. Other binders suitable for use are pre-
gelat.inized food starch, refined from tapioca and marketed under
45 the trade name Instant Gel~; stable, modified amylopectin marke-
ted under the trade name Kosol~; a low viscosity tapioca dextrin
marketed under the trade name Crystal Gum~; dextrinized corn
_

WO 95/029~ 2 ~ ~ 5 1 3 PCT~Pg4/0~53
starch marketed under the trade name Purity Glaze~; maltodextrin
marketed under the trade name ~altrin~, such as M040 by Grain
Processing corporation.
S The preferred amount o binders, fillers, and/or disintegrants in
the feed solution is from about 0.1 to about 99.7 wt.-%.
All of the above-described powders, with and without fillers,
binders, and/or disintegrating agents can then be tabletted or
10 filled into water soluble bags. Unexpectedly, the high potency
powders which contain only the hygroscopic PGR active material
and silica flow aid, tablet without aid of binders, fillers, and/
or disintegrants, or lubricants on a commercial tablet press. The
tablets formed are of commercial quality, having reproducible
lS weight, sufficient tablet strength, and acceptable solubility.
Water absorbance is m; n~ m~ 1 provided that the tablets are made in
a dehumidified room. The tablets can be dissolved and passed
through a 50 mesh screen such as that foùnd on spray e~llpm~nt
20 without residue.
While the ratios of the concentrations of the various components
of the present invention hereinafter suggested, those skilled in
the art will recognize that minor variations may be necessary to
25 accommodate particular characteristics of acceptable plant growth
regulators which may be employed in this invention.
In general, the formulations of the present invention contain
from about 0.1 to about 99.8 wt.-%, and preferably from about 95
30 to about 99 wt.-% of active ingredient.
Typically, for a plant growth regulator concentrate of the pre-
sent invention, the concentration of regulator active ingredient
will be at least 6 ml/acre (about 0.0125 pints/acre).
In such mixtures, concentrations of mepiquat chloride up to about
99 wt.-% are achievable. When the mixtures of the invention are
directly applied in a spray tank, the mepiquat chloride dissolves
instantly in the water and this spray solution passes a 50 mesh
40 screen of the spray equipment without residues.
The tablets can be manufactured by compressing the mixtures on
tablet machines. Also for tabletting, other inert ingredients
like disintegrants, binders, fillers, and/or disintegrants, wet-
45 ting agents or lubricants can be blended with the PGR mixture.(Optionally, the wetting agents and lubricants can be incorpora-
ted by addition in the drying step--either into the PGR liquid

W095/02963 2 1 6 7 5 1 3 PCT~P94/02253
solution before drying, or can be added with the inert flow aid
during drying.)
When the tablets are dropped into the water of the spray tank,
5 the mepiquat chloride is quickly dissolved and this spray solu-
tion passes a 50 mesh screen of the spray equipment without resi-
dues.
In addition to the above-described components, the compositions
10 of the present invention may also include other ingredients or
adjuvants commonly employed in the art.
Examples of such ingredients include drift control agents, defoa-
ming agents, preservatives, surfactants, fertilizers, phytotoxi-
15 cants, herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, wettingagents, adherents, nematocides, bactericides, trace elements,
synergists, antidotes, mixtures thereof and other such adjuvants
well known in the plant growth regulator art.
20 However, it is preferred to employ the compositions of the pre-
sent invention along with sequential treatments with these other
components for optimal efect.
The compositions of the present invention may be applied to
25 plants. The application of liquid and particulate solid plant
growth regulator compositions to above ground portions of plants
may be carried out by conventional methods, for example, boom and
hand application, including sprayers or dusters. The composition
may be applied aerially as a spray, if desired. The mixtures o
30 the present invention are preferably used in the form of aqueous
solutions. The mixtures are applied in a conventional m~nnerr for
example, by spraying, atomizing, watering or disinfecting seed.
The forms of application depend entirely on the purpose for which
35 the compositions are being used. In any event, they should ensure
a fine distribution of the active ingredients in the composition.
The above plant growth regulator formulation may then be disper-
sed in water and sprayed onto plants according to the method of
40 the present invention.
Powders, dusts and broadcasting agents may be prepared by mixirg
or grinding the active ingredients with a solid carrier.
45 Granules, for example, coated, impregnated or homogeneous granu-
les, may be prepared by bondir.g the active ingredients to solid
carriers. Examples of solid carriers are mineral earths such as

WO 95/02963 2 ~ ~ 7 ~ 1 ~ PCT~Pg4/02253
silicic acid, silica gels, silicates, talc, kaolin, Attaclay, li-
mestone, lime, chalk, bole, loess, clay, dolomite, diatomaceous
earth, calcium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium oxide,
ground plastics, fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate, ammonium
5 phosphate, ammonium nitrate, and ureas, and vegetable products
such as grain flours, bark meal, wood meal, and nutshell meal,
cellulosic powders, and the like.
The action of the compositions of the present invention are opti-
10 mal even at low application rates. For a given plant growth regu-
lator composition, the skilled artisan will readily arrive at a
composition having the optimum ratio of the ingredients by rou-
tine experimentation. The compositions of this invention may be
prepared, for example, by adding, in any order, the various com-
lS ponents of the composition of the present invention. For example,one may start with a co~m~rcial formulation of mepiquat chloride,
which is an aqueous concentrate cont~-n-ng 42 gms/l (about 0.35
pounds per gallon (US)) of mepiquat chloride (4.2 wt.-%). The-
reafter, in any order, one mixes suitable amounts of any optional
20 adjuvants or ingredients.
The following examples serve to illustrate the invention and
should in no way be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
25 Examples
Example 1 - Formulation
An aqueous solution of mepiquat chloride was dried to give a so-
30 lid mepiquat chloride with a water content of 0.2 wt.-%. This
product was not free flowing and caked in a sealed, tight contai-
ner after 2 days of storage at room temperature. Directly after
drying, 198 g solid mepiquat chloride were mixed with 2 g of
Aerosil~ 200 (highly dispersible, pyrogenic silicic acid, from
35 DEGUSSA, Germany) in a laboratory mixer to give a homogeneous
mixture. After storage in a sealed container for 1 month at room
temperature and 50C, there was no caking.
The mixture remained free flowing. Twenty grams of the mixture
40 were poured into a laboratory spray tank filled with about 3.8
liters (1 gallon) tap water at room temperature. The mepiquat
chloride dissolved completely within 1 minute. There was no resi-
due on a 100 mesh screen of the laboratory spray tank.
4S

W095/029~ 2 1 b 7 5 ~ 3 PCT~ W4/02253
Example 2 - Water Soluble Bag
One hundred grams of the mixture described in Example 1 were pak-
kaged using a bag made of a water soluble polyvinyl alcohol film
5 (Monosol~ M7030, from Chris-Craft Industries, USA). This water
soluble bag was dropped into a spray tank filled with about 95
liters (25 gallons) tap water at room temperature. The water was
circulated through a 50 mesh screen. The mepiquat chloride and
the film of the bag dissolved completely within 10 minutes. There
10 was no residue on the 50 mesh screen.
Example 3 - Tablet Formulation
Ninety-five grams of the mixture described in Example 1 and 5 g
15 Divergan~ F (finely powdered, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone,
from BASF Corporation, USA) were blended in a laboratory mixer. A
15 g tablet, 5.7 cm (2 1/2 in.) diameter, was made with a hand
operated hydraulic press. The tablet was dropped into a spray
tank with tap water at room temperature. The tablet broke up com-
20 pletely and the mepiquat chloride dissolved within 10 minutes.There was no residue on the 50 mesh screen of the spray tank.
FxAmp~e 4 - Formulation
25 Directly after drying as described in Example 1, 294 g solid me-
piquat chloride were mixed with 6 g Sipernat~ 50 S in a labora-
tory mixer to give a homogeneous mixture. After storage in a sea-
led container for 1 month at room temperature and 50C, there was
no caking. The mixture remained free flowing.
Twenty grams of the mixture were poured into a laboratory spray
tank filled with about 3.8 liters (1 gal.) tap water at room
temperature. The mepiquat chloride dissolved completely within 1
minute. There was no residue on the 100 mesh screen of the labo-
35 ratory spray tank.
Example 5 - Water Soluble Bag
One hundred grams of the mixture described in Example 4 were pak-
40 kaged using a bag made of a water soluble polyvinyl alcohol film
tMonosol~ M8532, from Chris-Craft Industries, USA). This water
soluble bag was dropped into a spray tank filled with about 95
liters (25 gallons) tap water at room temperature. The water was
circulated through a 100 mesh screen. The mepiquat chloride and
45 the film dissolved completely within 10 minutes. These was no re-
sidue on the 100 mesh screen.

WO 95/02963 ~ 5 ~ ~ PCT~P94/02253
Example 6 - Tablet Formulation
Using the mixture of Examples 4, 20 g tablets, 5.7 cm (2 1/2 in.
diameter, were made with a hand operated hydraulic press. Five
5 tablets were dropped into a spray tank filled with about 95 li-
ters (25 gallons) tap water at room temperature. The tablets
broke up completely and the mepiquat chloride dissolved within 12
minutes. There was no residue on the 100 mesh screen of the spray
tank.
Example 7 - Formulation
A 600 g/l solution of mepiquat chloride was placed in an agita-
ted, jacketed, spray dryer feed tank and heated to 65C with tem-
15 pered water. The heated solution was pumped at 125 g/min to anatomizing wheel rotating at about I7,000 rpm in a spray dryer (a
Niro Utility for example). Silica (Sipernat~ 50S) from a losq-in-
weight screwfeeder was injected via an air eductor into the air
plenum to mix with the heated air entering the plenum. The silica
20 was fed at a rate of 4 wt.-% based on the dry basis feed rate of
the mepiquat chloride solution. The silica/air mixture, at 200C,
then entered the drying chamber, int~rm;x; ng with the droplets
formed by the atomizer. The resultant outlet temperature is about
140C. On drying the powder exits the drying chamber does not ad-
25 here to the walls of the spray dryer, the ducting, or the cycloneseparator. The powder r~m~lns flowable in a polyethylene bag pak-
ked in a sealed plastic drum.
The resulting powder was flowable, had a moisture content of 0.25
30 wt.-%, a bulk density of 0.29 g/ml untapped, 0.38 g/ml tapped,
and an ash content of about 2 wt.-%. The powder assayed at about
97 wt.-% mepiquat chloride.
Example 8
Steam at 105 psig was introduced to a lab scale double drum dryer
and the rolls rotated at about 5 rpm. Mepiquat chloride liquid
was fed from a reservoir to the nip of the rolls at a rate of ab-
out 36 g/minute. The material adhered to the rolls and the moi-
40 sture was evaporated while the drums rotated. The solid film wasscraped off the rolls by a blade and collected. Material collec-
ted without silica rapidly caked. Material that was collected and
mixed with about 2 wt.-% (Sipernat~ 50S) silica did not cake and
was flowable. The moisture content was about 1.2 wt.-% in the re-
45 sultant powder, with a density of 0.25 g/ml untapped and 0.35g/ml tapped.

W095/02963 2 1 6 7 ~ I ~ PCT~P94/02253
13
Example g
To a 130 liter Littleford "mechanical fluid bed" dryer (Model
FKM-130 with chopping blade), about 78 kilograms (171.6 lbs) of
5 mepiquat chloride 600 g/l aqueous solution was charged. The agi-
tator plough was started at 155 rpm, and 15 psig steam introduced
to the jacket. A vacuum was pulled with a vacuum pump, maintai-
ning 600 mm Hg at the pump. The evaporated vapors passed through
a bag filter and were condensed using a cold glycol/water mixture
10 on the shell side of a condenser. The resulting condensate was
collected in a receiver.
As evaporation continued, the amperage drawn by the plough motor
began to rise. The chopper blades were turned on, and the drying
15 completed. During this time the steam pressure on the jacket was
progressively increased to drive off the water from the forming
paste. As more water was removed, the paste turned to solid, the
chopper greatly increasing the rate of drying by dividing moist -
material and exposing the interior moisture to the vacuum and hot
20 dryer walls. When water was no longer being removed, the dried
solid was cooled by applying cool water to the jacket of the ap-
paratus. Approximately 2 wt.-% of silica was then added to the
material and allowed to blend. When this mixing operation was
complete, the finished product was discharged to a drum.
2S
The resulting free flowing powder was composed of particles ran-
ging from approximately 5 to 60 microns in diameter, with a moi-
sture of about 0.08 wt.-%, and bulk density of 0.63 untapped and
0.79 tapped, and ash content of about 2 wt.-~. The powder assayed
30 at about 97 wt.-% mepiquat chloride. There was no detectable me-
piquat chloride in the overhead condensate.
Example 10
35 About 4.5 kilograms (lO pounds) of powder made by the method in
Example 9 was charged to the feed hopper of a single station ex-
center tablet press (Stokes R type for example~ located in a low
humidity room. The relative humidity of the room remained about
28% between about 21 and 27C (70 and 80F). The press was fitting
40 with tooling to make about 5.7 cm (2.25 inch) diameter tablets.
After pressure and size adjustments, tablets were made of about
21 grams with good tablet integrity. Hardnesses, as measured on a
RIMAC tester, were to about 9.5 kg (21 lbs) force. Tablets were
found to have picked up less than 0.3 wt.-% moisture during this
45 operation.

wo 95/02963 2 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 3; PCT~P94/02253
The tablets had thicknesses of about 0.8 to 0.9 centimeters. The
tablets dissolved under mild agitation in water in about 7 to 9
minutes and the resulting liquid did not deposit any residue when
passed through 150 micron sieve (100 mesh).
S
Whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been descri-
bed above for purposes of illustration, it will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details
may be made without departing from the invention as described in
10 the appended claims.
Example 11
A mepiquat chloride powder prepared by the method of (example 8
15 for drum dryer) was tabletted (by a Carver press for example).
Pr~ss pressure was varied at 6 to 7 metric tons, 8 to 9 metric
tons, and 10 to ll metric tons for durations of 1 minute each.
The formed tablets, of 2.26 inches in diameter, had thicknesses
between 6.1 and 6.6 mm (0.24 and 0.26 inches) with weights of
20 between 15.3 to 15.6 gms, with breaking strengths between 4 and
10 kgs (9 and 22.3 lbs) as det~rmined on a modified Chatillon
electronic tester, model DFI-50 mounted on a model LTC manual
test stand. The tablets were dissolved in 750 ml of 342 ppm hard-
ness water stirred with a magnetic stirring bar and dissolved
25 completely in 0.9 to 4.7 minutes.
Example 12
A mepiquat chloride powder prepared by the method of (example 9
30 for the ~ittleford dryer) was tabletted (in a Carver press for
example). Press pressure was varied at 8 to 9 metric tons, and 10
to 11 metric tons for durations of 1 minute each. The formed ta-
blets, of 2.26 inches in diameter, had thicknesses between 6.1
and 6.6 mms t0.24 and 0.26 inches) with weights of between 15.3
35 to 15.7 gms, with breaking strengths between 7.7 and 14.5 kgs (17
and 32 lbs) as determined on a modified Chatillon electronic te-
ster, model DFI-50 mounted on a model LTC manual test stand. The
tablets were dissolved in 750 ml of 342 ppm hardness water stir-
red with a magnetic stirring bar and dissolved completely in 4.4
40 to 5.8 minutes.
Example 13
A mepiquat chloride powder prepared by the method of (example 7
45 for the spray dryer) was tabletted (in a Carver press for
example). Press pressure was varied at 6 to 7 metric tons, 8 to 9
metric tons, and 10 to 11 metric tons for durations of 1 minute

21675t~
W095/029~ PCT~P94/02253
each. The formed tablets, of 5.74 cms (2.26 inches) in diameter,
had thicknesses between 5.8 and 7.1 mms (0.23 and 0.28 inches)
with weights of between 14.4 to 15.7 gms, with breaking strengths
between 7.48 and 24.9 kgs (16.5 and 55 lbs) as determined on a
5 modified Chatillon electronic tester, model DFI-50 mounted on a
model LTC manual test stand. The tablets were dissolved in 750 ml
of 342 ppm hardness water stirred with a magnetic stirring bar
and dissolved completely in 3.8 to 4.8 minutes.
i
10 Whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been descri-
bed above for purposes of illustration, it will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details
may be made without departing from the invention as described in
the appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Dead - Final fee not paid 2005-12-05
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2005-12-05
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-07-11
Deemed Abandoned - Conditions for Grant Determined Not Compliant 2004-12-03
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-06-03
Letter Sent 2004-06-03
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-06-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-04-28
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-03-31
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-02-24
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-02-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-01-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-11-05
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2001-08-27
Letter Sent 2001-08-27
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2001-08-27
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2001-08-27
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2001-08-27
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2001-07-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-07-04
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-07-03
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-07-03
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-02-02

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-07-11
2004-12-03

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-06-18

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1997-07-09 1997-06-27
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 1998-07-09 1998-06-30
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 1999-07-09 1999-06-21
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2000-07-10 2000-06-30
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2001-07-09 2001-06-29
Request for examination - standard 2001-07-03
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2002-07-09 2002-06-18
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2003-07-09 2003-06-26
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2004-07-09 2004-06-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BASF CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
KARL-FRIEDRICH JAGER
RUDOLPH ERNEST LISA
TERENCE, JR. KILBRIDE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1995-02-01 15 808
Claims 1995-02-01 2 58
Abstract 1995-02-01 1 38
Drawings 1995-02-01 3 28
Claims 2001-09-18 2 63
Description 2004-01-07 17 861
Claims 2004-01-07 3 64
Claims 2004-02-23 3 61
Representative drawing 2004-03-30 1 5
Abstract 2004-04-15 1 38
Claims 2004-04-27 3 65
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-03-11 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-08-26 1 194
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-06-02 1 161
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (NOA) 2005-02-13 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2005-09-05 1 173
PCT 1996-01-16 16 553
Fees 1996-06-18 1 48