Language selection

Search

Patent 2171369 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2171369
(54) English Title: THE USE OF VIRULENCE FACTORS OF PATHOGENS TO IMPROVE LIPOSOMAL DELIVERY OF ANTIBIOTICS AND/OR VACCINES
(54) French Title: UTILISATION D'AGGRESSINES D'AGENTS PATHOGENES PERMETTANT D'AMELIORER L'ADMINISTRATION LIPOSOMIQUE D'ANTIBIOTIQUES ET (OU) DE VACCINS
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61K 9/127 (2006.01)
  • A61K 31/496 (2006.01)
  • A61K 31/65 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/10 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/21 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/39 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/42 (2006.01)
  • A61K 47/00 (2006.01)
  • A61K 47/36 (2006.01)
  • A61P 31/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WONG, JONATHAN P. (Canada)
  • CHERWONOGRODZKY, JOHN W. (Canada)
  • DININNO, VINCENT L. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE
  • HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE
(71) Applicants :
  • HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE (Canada)
  • HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE (Canada)
(74) Agent: BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-09-09
(22) Filed Date: 1996-03-08
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-09-09
Examination requested: 2002-12-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


Liposome encapsulated antibiotic therapy has limited application against
infectious organisms
which can sequester in non-phagocytic cells. Virulence factors of these
infectious organisms,
for example bacterial components, when used in the formulation of liposomes
can enhance
the effectiveness of liposomes as delivery systems in the treatment of
disease. In this manner,
multi-functional liposomes can be developed to treat target diseases. In
addition to serving
as antibiotic delivery systems, such liposomes also have an immunization
effect. Thus, the
liposomes can be used for both the prevention and treatment of diseases.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims:
1. A liposome for the delivery of a therapeutic agent to an animal, the
liposome having a
smooth lipopolysaccharide from Brucella melitensis incorporated into its
structure, and wherein
the therapeutic agent is entrapped within the liposome.
2. The liposome according to claim 1 wherein the therapeutic agent is an
antibiotic.
3. The liposome according to claim 2 wherein the antibiotic is ciprofloxacin.
4. A method of preparing a liposome comprising the steps of:
- dissolving lipids in a suitable solvent and drying;
- thoroughly dissolving the dried lipids in a solution comprising a smooth
lipopolysaccharide from Brucella melitensis and a therapeutic agent;
- sonicating and freeze drying the resulting solution; and
- reconstituting the liposome with water.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the therapeutic agent is an antibiotic.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the antibiotic is ciprofloxacin.
7. The method of any one of claims 4 to 6 wherein the lipids are
phophatidylcholine,
cholesterol and phophatidylserine in the molar ratio of 7:2:1.
8. A composition for the delivery of a therapeutic agent to an animal, the
composition
comprising
a liposome; and
a smooth lipopolysaccharide from Brucella melitensis incorporated into the
structure of
the liposome; and
a therapeutic agent, wherein the therapeutic agent is entrapped within the
liposome.
9. The composition of claim 8 wherein the therapeutic agent is an antibiotic.
16

10. The composition of claim 9 wherein the antibiotic is ciprofloxacin.
11. Use of a liposome for the delivery of a therapeutic agent to a non-
phagocytic cell in an
animal, the liposome having a smooth lipopolysaccharide from Brucella
melitensis incorporated
into its structure, and wherein the therapeutic agent is entrapped within the
liposome.
12. The liposome according to claim 11 wherein the therapeutic agent is an
antibiotic.
13. The liposome according to claim 12 wherein the antibiotic is
ciprofloxacin.
17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2171369
The Use Of Virulence Factors Of Pathogens To Improve
Liposomal Delivery Of Antibiotics And/Or Vaccines
Background of the Invention
Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that afflicts, depending on the region,
about 5% of
the livestock around the world. Although cattle, swine, sheep, goats and dogs
are the usual
hosts (with B. abortus, B. suis, B. ovis, B. melitensis and B. canis being the
usual agents,
respectively), the impact of brucellosis may be far greater as it can also
infect other animals
such as poultry and marine mammals. The manifestation of these bacteria in
animals are
usually reproductive complications (aborted fetuses, inflammed uterus or
orchitis, sterility).
Brucella is a bacterium that can become a facultative parasite, invading cells
of the blood,
bone marrow, organs and skeletal tissue. It is difficult to eliminate and
relapses of infections
may occur once antibiotic treatment ceases. Vaccination in animals have proven
partially
effective in offering protection, though these vaccines are pathogenic for
other animals and
humans.
Because it is a highly infective organism that causes debilitating symptoms,
Brucella
can persist in the environment for months under the right conditions, and as
there are no
effective vaccines or therapeutic recourses, it is potentially a bacterial
warfare agent. There
is, therefore, an urgent need to develop a means for protecting or treating
people at risk.
Although antibiotics are effective in inhibiting or killing pathogens, they
are less
effective against pathogens that infect and then become intracellular
parasites within animal
or human hosts. Rather than being destroyed by white blood cells, the Brucella
species, for
-1-

2171369
example, thrive within these cells. Antibiotics are available that will
inactivate Brucella
species, but these are effective only in the test tube. In vivo, the bacterium
will invade cells
of the reticulo-endothelial system and become a facultative parasite,
rendering it protected and
difficult to treat. Antibiotics are limited in their effectiveness due to the
following reasons:
- only a small portion of the antibiotic may reach the infected cell due to
its
dilution throughout the body;
- some antibiotics may not be able to cross the mammalian cell membrane
barrier;
- the antibiotic may be excreted through the urine; and,
- some antibiotics may become inactivated by serum or cellular enzymes.
Current research in liposome encapsulation of antibiotics has brought in a new
era in
the therapy of disease. Liposomes are microscopic pockets of lipids that can
be used to
entrap antibiotics and to deliver these into phagocytic cells. The advantages
of such a process
are:
- liposomes contain the antibiotic and prevent its dilution within the body or
secretion in the urine;
- these lipid vesicles are also phagocytized and will be delivered to the site
where the pathogen has sequestered; and,
- the liposomes are made of bio-degradable lipids and are non-toxic. Indeed,
these may shield the body from the harmful side-effects of toxic antibiotics.
The use of liposomes as an antibiotic delivery system is described in the
inventors' co-
pending Canadian application no. 2,101,241 (published January 24, 1995)
wherein liposome
-2-

2171369
encapsulated ciprofloxacin was found to be more effective in the prevention
and treatment of
Francisella tularensis infection than the non-encapsulated antibiotic.
Further, the use of multiple doses of negatively charged liposomes as carriers
of
gentamicin into cells have been reported but these were only partially
effective in vivo (Dees,
C. et al., 1985, Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 8, 171-182), possibly because
liposomes require
phagocytosis for delivery and Brucella can invade even non-phagocytic cells
(Detilleux, P.G.
et al., 1990, Infect. Immun., 58, 2320-2328). Non-phagocytic cells are
unlikely to engulf
liposomal antibiotics and so will protect their intra-cellular parasites from
these therapeutic
agents. Other antibiotics within liposomes have proven effective against some
strains of
Brucella (eg. B. canis and B. abortus) but less so against another strain (eg.
B. melitensis)
(Hemandez-Caselles, T. et al., 1989, Am. J. Vet. Res., 50, 1486-1488). The
treatment of the
latter strain with antibiotics requires liposomes of a positive rather than
negative charge,
requires multiple treatments to be effective and although the organism may
appear eliminated
in mice 5 days after treatment, relapses are a possibility.
Gregoriadis, in Canadian application no. 2,109,952 (published December 23,
1992),
describes the use of polysaccharide coated liposomes as drug delivery agents.
It is described
that such polysaccharide coating is used to increase the residence time of
liposomes in vivo
thereby prolonging the availability of the drug. However, this reference does
not address the
issue of such liposomes entering non-phagocytic cells. The use of
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
with liposomes has been described by Djikstra et al. (1988, J. Immunol. Meth.,
114, 197-205)
but the LPS was typically water-soluble and housed within the liposome rather
than part of
the liposome's composition.
-3-

2171369
Thus, antibiotic therapy of some diseases is very limited due to the
protection offered
when the facultative parasites are intracellular. Liposome encapsulation of
these antibiotics
enhances their effectiveness, but the indication is that there is a need for
"designer" liposomes,
or specific formulations of liposomes for different diseases.
Summary of the Invention
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a new
liposome or
microsphere formulation which includes the virulence factors of infectious
agents.
Liposomes according to the present invention have enhanced effectiveness as
delivery systems
for antibiotics in the treatment of disease.
Thus, the invention provides for the use of virulence factors in the
formulation (in
combination with or in the replacement of lipids) of microspheres and
specifically in
liposomes.
Further, the invention provides for a pharmaceutical formulation for
preventing or
treating infections wherein antibiotics are encapsulated by liposomes
comprised in part by
virulence factors such as bacterial components.
The invention also provides a method of manufacturing liposomes formulated
with
virulence factors.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Since some bacteria have mechanisms for invading host cells (Kuhn, M. and W.
Goebel, 1989, Infect. Immun., 57, 55-61) it was speculated that these
virulence factors could
be used to improve liposomes for the delivery of antibiotics into mammalian
cells. As several
-4-

_ 2171369
pathogenic bacteria have the same rare sugar on their cell surfaces as
Brucella
(Cherwonogrodzky, J.W. et al., 1989, in Animal Brucellosis, K. Nielson and
J.R. Duncan
(ed.), 19-81), it is likely that their smooth-lipopolysaccharides (S-LPS) have
something to do
with their invasiveness into cells.
Virulence factors include enzymes (e.g proteases of the flesh-eating
bacterium), toxins
(e.g. diphtheria toxin), binding components (e.g. Protein A of Staphlococcus
aureus) and
invasive factors (e.g. the protein "invasin" from Listeria monocytogenous, the
lipopolysaccharide of Brucella, and the glycoproteins of some viruses).
Further, the invention will be described with specific reference to liposomes.
However, the invention is applicable to any microsphere. By microsphere it is
meant any
microscopic vesicle capable to carrying antibiotics, drugs etc. Some examples
are nylon
beads, polymers of amino acids or carbohydrates, globules of detergents and
"bubbles" of
lipids or liposomes.
Thus, it will be shown that virulence factors (such as bacterial components)
can be
included in the composition of liposomes to improve their effectiveness as
delivery systems
of therapeutic agents against specific diseases. Proof of this concept is
given in the following
study that uses the bacterial component lipopolysaccharide with exceptional
properties
(hydrophobic rather than hydrophilic, associated with invasive properties, low
toxicity).
Material and Methods
i) Bacterium: Brucella melitensis 16M was acquired from Agriculture Canada,
Animal Diseases Research Institute, Nepean, Ontario. It was maintained on
Brucella agar
with 1.4 ppm crystal violet, 370C, 5% COz. The strain used was passed once
through a
mouse and isolated from its spleen. Prior to use, a single colony of bacteria
was sub-cultured
-5-

CA 02171369 2007-08-07
.,.~. .
on tiypticase soy agar witliout crystal violet, incubated for three days, and
then this fresh
growth, suspended in sterile ]% saline, was used to infect mice. previous
studies showed that
a suspension having an O.D.. of 0,1 bad 1 x 10 colony forming units (CFU) /
mi. Dilutions
of 2.5 x 10' CFU/ml were made and 0.2 ml of this was used to infect each
mouse.
ii) S-LFS; Bnrcella melitensis 16 M S-LFS was purified by the rnethod of
Cherwonogrodzky et al. (Antigens of Brucella. In Anirnal brucellosis, CRC
Press, Boca
Raton, pp. 19-81, [1990]). Briefly, a culture was grown in Bruoalls broth,
killed with 2%
phenol, then following centrifugation, the supetnatant was saved and crudc S-
LPS was
prccipitated with 5 volumes of inethanol with 1% sodium acetate (w/v). The
precipitate was
collected by centrifugation, dialysed against TRIS buffer (pH 7), then
digested with
lysozyme, RNAse, DNAse and proteinase K. A phenol-water extraction was done,
the
phenol layer was removed and the S-LPS was precipitated and washed with
=thanol-acetate.
The preparation was dialysed, ultraoentrifuged overnight at 120,000 x g and
the pellet was re-
suspended in distilled water, then lyophilizcd,
iii) Preparation of liposomes with S-LPS: The basis liposome was prepared by
dissolving in 2:1 chloroform:ntethanol the lipids
phosphatidylcholine; cholesterol:phosphatidylserino(AvAntiLipidsInc.,
Birmingham,Alabama.)
in a molar ratio of 7:2:1 (a total of 20 moles were used, respective
molecular weights are
810:387:745, amounts used were 11.34 mg:1.55 mg-1,49 mg a1a in 1 ml). The
lipid solution
was dried to a thin film on the bvttam of a large screw-capped tube by heating
at 45oC in
a heating block. Throughout this procedure, the content of the tube was purged
with a gentle
stream of dry nitrogen. The lipids were then further dried for 30 min. in a
vacuum chamber
to remove any remaining organic solvent.
=6-

2171369
The S-LPS (10 mg in 1 ml phosphate buffered saline, pH 7) was sonicated in a
bath-
type sonicator for approximately 3 min. or until the S-LPS solution became
homogenous.
Part of the dispersed S-LPS solution (40 l) was added to the tube containing
the dried lipid
mixture. Ciprofloxacin (Miles Canada Inc., Etobicoke, Ontario) or tetracycline
(Sigma
Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was made at 20 mg/ml distilled water and of this
2 ml was
added to the tube. The contents of the tube were mixed vigorously by vortexing
and heating
at 45 oC. The vortexing-heating cycle was repeated about 15-25 times, under
dry nitrogen,
until the dried lipids were completely dislodged from the sides of the tube
(about 20 min. is
required for this procedure). The lipid-antibiotic-LPS mixture was gently
sonicated as before
for approximately 2 min. and was then rapidly frozen in a dry ice-methanol
mixture. The
sample was then freeze-dried overnight in a lyophilizer (Virtis Company Inc.,
Gardiner, NY).
The freeze dried mixture was reconstituted in 0.5 ml of distilled water. The
reconstituted liposomes were then vortexed for 2 to 3 minutes under nitrogen
and were left
undisturbed at room temperature for 1 hour. The liposomes were washed with 8
ml of
distilled water then ultra-centrifuged at 125,000 x g for 30 min at 4 OC. The
pellet was
re-suspended in distilled water, ultra-centrifuged as before, and then
reconstituted in distilled
water. Encapsulation was about 50% efficient and so 4 ml of water gave a
suspension of 5
mg/ml (1 mg/0.2 ml was used to treat each mouse). The preparation was used
immediately.
iv) Animal Studies: 5 week old BALB/c mice (15 - 16g) were obtained from
Charles River Canada Inc. (St. Constant, Quebec) and were left in quarantine
at least a week
before use. Intravenous injections were done at the tail vein, intramuscular
injections were
at a thigh muscle. Throughout the study, the mice were housed in HorsfalTM
units and cared
for under the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines. At the end of the
study, the
-7-

CA 02171369 2007-08-07
animals were sacrificed by cervicat dislocation, their spleens were
aseptir,ally removed,
crushed in 2 mt sterile saline with a manual tissue grinder (Wheaton,
Mi1lville, N.3.), then
diluted in saline and plated onto Brueella agar with crystal violet. The
plates were lacubuteci
as before and inspected 3 and 7 days later.
gesults gnd Dilcusslnn
Upon testing negatively-abarged liposomes in the delivery of ciprofloxacin
(LIP-Cipro,
or liposome encapsulated ciprofloxaain) for the prophylaxis and treatment of
mice given 10
LDja of Francisella tulamnsis LVS, the animals were rescued from certain
death, even when
only a single dose of LIP-Cipro was given (as described in Canadian patent
number
2,101,a41).
Upon testing the sama formulation against B. selitensia 16M, it appeared to
be neither
protective nor therapeutic against this disease as illustrated in Tables 1 and
2 respectively.
This supports the study by Dees et al. (1985) who showed that even multiple
doses of .._ ,. .
antibiotic within liposomes cannot eliminate brucellosis in vivo. Thie
limftation is
understandable in that Brncella has been found to have the ability to invade
even non- .
pba$oc.ytic celfs (Hernandez-Caselles et al., 1989). It theretbre can invade,
sequestor and
grow within tissues that liposomes of the usval formulation caanot reach.
The mechanism by which Brucella speaies can penetrate the noted cells is
unknown.
However, it has been obaerved that several invasive pathogens (e.g. Yibrio
eholerae, Yersinia
enterocolitica 0:9, togigenic Escherichia coli 0:15yH.=7, Salmonella landau,
Pseudomonas
maltophilia 555) have derivatives of a rare sugar (4-amino-4,6-alpha-D-
mannopyrannose
(Cberwonogrodzky et al., Antigens of Brucella. In Animal brucellosis, CRC
Press, Boca
Raton, pp. 19-81, [1990]), also fotmd on Brucella, on their 0-polysaccharide
which forms
part of the smooth-lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) that coats these bactcria. On
the chance
.g.

2171369
that liposomes, with this antigen as part of their composition, would gain an
advantage in
being delivered to similar sites as viable Brucella, we formulated a novel
liposome that had
B. melitensis S-LPS as part of its composition. It should be noted that this S-
LPS differs
from the S-LPS of several other bacteria in that it is hydrophobic and is
readliy incorporated
with the other lipids in liposome formulation. Table 3, for the protection
against diseases, and
Table 4, for the treatment of infected mice, show that multiple doses of
liposomes having S-
LPS in their composition and used to encapsulated antibiotics, such as
ciprofloxacin or
tetracycline, were effective in greatly reducing the number of bacteria. Table
3 shows that
this result is temporary, possibly due to other sites in the animal providing
a source of
infection. There is also some protection given by S-LPS given with
tetracycline, in the
absence of liposomal formulation. This latter observation may be due to the
ability of S-LPS
to spontaneously form structures that may entrap or associate with
tetracycline. The evidence
suggests that virulence factors, in this case Brucella S-LPS, may replace part
or all of the
lipids used in liposome formulation.
Although the embodiment described herein relates to the use of S-LPS in the
formulation of liposomes, the same results may also be obtained by using other
virulence
factors (i.e. bacterial components such as rough-lipopolysaccharide, outer-
polysaccharide,
lipids, or proteins) or bacterial components linked to carriers (i.e. O-
polysaccharide linked to
proteins such as bovine serum albumin) or modified bacterial components (i.e.
alkaline treated
S-LPS, detoxified LPS, cloned protein fragments). Further, the virulence
factors can be used
with, or replace part or all of the lipids used in the formulation of
liposomes.
It is believed that the present invention may have several applications:
-9-

T 2171369
1) For diseases (bacteria, rickettsiae, viruses, fungi, parasites) which are
difficult to
treat, "designer" liposomes may be formulated by extracting components from
these pathogens
and incorporating these in the formulation of delivery systems. The components
could be
used intact, fragmented, or coupled to carriers before being used. The
components do not
have to be characterized, and if cross-reactive, may be used in the treatment
or protection
against more than one pathogen. Thus, by incorporating whole, modified, or
fragments of
cellular components of the pathogen into the liposome formulation, one may
improve the
effectiveness of this delivery system.
2) Potentially, a liposome or microsphere formulated with this technology
could be
multi-functional (ie. the invasive factor in the liposome composition may
assist delivery
within cells as well as serve as a vaccine, this novel liposomal formulation
may be used to
entrap antibiotics, immuno-modulators or drugs). In the embodiment described
herein, the S-
LPS component is used to enhance either the stability or delivery of the
liposome to sites of
infection. The S-LPS is also a strong antigen. One could therefore have a
liposome or
microsphere that serves as a more effective delivery system, provides antigen
as a vaccine,
encapsulates antibiotics for treatment and may have some immuno-modulation
effect. For
example, this type of multi-functional liposome or microsphere has an invasive
factor and/or
a vaccinating agent incorporated within its structure and is used to deliver
antibiotics, drugs,
antibodies and/or immuno-modulators. The use of this new formulation may
greatly enhance
prophylaxis against disease or its treatment.
3) Further, such multi-functional liposomes may have significant impact on
difficult
diseases. In the example of AIDS research, inactivated HIV coupled to B.
abortus gives 6-
fold better immunization than inactivated HIV alone (Golding, G. et al., 1991,
AIDS Res.
- 10 -

- 2171369
Hum. Retrovir., 7, 435-446). Potentially, a liposome, with B. abortus or B.
melitensis LPS
as part of its formulation, that encapsulates inactivated HIV, anti-viral
agents, antibodies from
HIV-positive/AIDS-negative patients, immuno-modulators or a combination
thereof may be
even more effective. Also, one may have the HIV antigen as part of the
liposome formulation
that encapsulates anti-viral antibiotics such as AZT. It should be noted that
the Brucella LPS
is about 1000-fold less toxic than other bacterial S-LPS (Goldstein et al.,
1992, Infect.
Immun., 60, 1385-1389) and would be ideal for this formulation.
Although the invention has been described with reference to certain specific
embodiments, various modifications thereof will be apparent to those skilled
in the art without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as outlined in the
appended claims.
- 11 -

_ 2171369
Table 1
Protection studies of BALB/c mice given single doses of antibiotics at
different times before
infection with Brucella melitensis 16M'
Antibiotic Time Before Infection B. melitensis 16M counts
(days) in spleens 7 days after
infection
Control 1.0 0.3 x 10'
Ciprofloxacin 7 1.9 0.4 x 104
3 1.4 f 0.2 x 104
2 2.8f1.0x104
1 1.5 f 0.3 x 104
Liposome Encapsulated 7 3.4 1.0 x 10'
Ciprofloxacin (LIP-Cipro) 3 2.3 0.5 x 104
2 3.9f1.4x104
1 2.9f1.1x104
A total of 1 mg ciprofloxacin in 0.2 ml saline/mouse (3 mice/set) was given
intramuscularly
at the times noted. The mice were then infected with 5 x 104 colony forming
units (CFU) of
B. melitensis 16M.
- 12-

- 2171369
Table 2
Treatment studies of BALB/c mice given single doses of antibiotics at
different times after
infection with Brucella melitensis 16M'
Antibiotic Time After Infection B. melitensis 16M counts
(days) in spleens 7 days after
treatment
Control 1.0 0.3 x 104
Ciprofloxacin 1 1.6 0.3 x 104
2 3.0 f 0.6 x 104
3 3.5f0.9x104
7 3.9f1.6x104
Liposome Encapsulated 1 2.8 f 0.9 x 104
Ciprofloxacin (LIP-Cipro) 2 2.0 0.7 x 104
3 2.4f0.8x104
7 2.6 f 0.7 x 104
Same procedure as in Table 1.
- 13 -

2171369
Table 3
Protection studies of BALB/c mice given multiple doses of antibiotics at
different times
before infection with Brucella melitensis 16M'
11 B. melitensis 16M counts in spleens
Antibiotic2 Time Before 3 days after 11 days after
Infection (Days) infection infection
Control: 3.6 0.9 x 104 1.0 0.4 x 105
no treatment
Control: 7,3,2,1 1.2 f 0.4 x 103 2.1 0.7 x 104
LIP-LPS 3,2,1 2.3 0.7 x 104 4.3 0.3 x 104
2,1 8.0f2.0x103 1.1f0.8x105
1 5.4f0.8x104 1.6f0.6x105
Control: 7,3,2,1 4.3 0.3 x 102 3.6 f 1.8 x 103
TETRA-LPS 3,2,1 7.0 3.8 x 103 1.2 f 1.0 x 104
2,1 1.8f0.4x104 1.7f0.5x104
1 7.9f2.5x104 3.5f0.3x104
LIP-CIPRO-LPS 7,3,2,1 0 1.2 f 1.2 x 103
3,2,1 0 1.0 f 0.8 x 103
2,1 1.0 1.0 x 10' 3.3 f 0.9 x 103
1 1.8t0.8x103 1.0f0.4x103
LIP-TETRA-LPS 7,3,2,1 7.5 0.9 x 102 1.8 f 1.8 x 103
3,2,1 1.9f0.2x103 9.0t1.2x103
2,1 3.1f1.1x103 1.9f0.1x104
1 3.0t0.6x103 2.8f1.6x104
Same as for Table 1, except 2 mice were used per set. Protection is defined as
causing a
log,o less CFU as controls.
2 Antibiotic abbreviations are:
a) LIP-LPS for liposomes made with B. melitensis smooth-lipopolysaccharide (S-
LPS)
and no antibiotic;
b) TETRA-LPS is non-encapsulated tetracycline and S-LPS;
c) LIP-CIPRO-LPS is ciprofloxacin encapsulated in liposomes made with S-LPS;
and,
d) LIP-TETRA-LPS is tetracycline encapsulated in liposomes with S-LPS.
-14-

2171369
Table 4
Treatment studies of BALB/c mice given multiple doses of antibiotics at
different times after
infection with Brucella melitensis 16M'
Spleen counts after antibiotic was given by the
following routes
Antibiotic Intramuscular Intravenous
Control: no treatment 2.4 f 0.3 x 104 2.4 0.3 x 104
Control: LIP-LPS 2.1 ~ 0.5 x 104 2.1 0.5 x 104
TetracyclineZ 4.8 f 0.8 x 103 4.1 0.6 x 103
TETRA-LIP 3.2 ~ 1.4 x 103 4.4 0.3 x 103
TETRA-LIP-LPS - 4.7 0.9 x 102
Ciprofloxacin 1.3 0.4 x 104 2.0 0.6 x 104
CIPRO-LIP 1.1 0.1 x 104 1.4 0.2 x 104
CIPRO-LIP-LPS - 8.1 4.9 x 103
For each set, three mice were infected with 5 x 104 colony forming units (CFU)
of Brucella
melitensis intravenously on day 0. Treatments consisted of a dose of 1 mg
antibiotic/0.2 ml
and were given on days 7, 8 and 9. The mice were sacrificed on day 12, the
spleens were
harvested, crushed in saline and then plated.
2 All antibiotics were given at 1 mg/mouse. TETRA = tetracycline, CIPRO =
ciprofloxacin,
LIP = liposome encapsulated, LPS = B. melitensis 16M smooth-lipopolysaccharide
in
liposome formulation.
- 15 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2171369 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2011-03-08
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2010-11-04
Letter Sent 2010-03-08
Grant by Issuance 2008-09-09
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-09-08
Inactive: Final fee received 2008-06-10
Pre-grant 2008-06-10
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2008-05-05
Letter Sent 2008-05-05
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2008-05-05
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2008-01-25
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2007-08-07
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-02-07
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-02-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Inactive: IPC removed 2007-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-01-19
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-03-02
Inactive: Office letter 2005-03-02
Inactive: Office letter 2005-03-02
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-03-02
Appointment of Agent Request 2005-02-23
Revocation of Agent Request 2005-02-23
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-11-12
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2003-02-18
Letter Sent 2003-02-18
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2003-02-18
Inactive: Agents merged 2003-02-05
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2002-12-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-12-11
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-12-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-09-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-12-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTE
Past Owners on Record
JOHN W. CHERWONOGRODZKY
JONATHAN P. WONG
VINCENT L. DININNO
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1996-03-08 15 524
Abstract 1996-03-08 1 19
Claims 1996-03-08 4 90
Cover Page 1996-03-08 1 19
Cover Page 1997-10-20 1 45
Cover Page 2000-12-11 1 45
Description 2007-08-07 15 509
Claims 2007-08-07 2 39
Cover Page 2008-08-21 2 40
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1997-11-11 1 111
Reminder - Request for Examination 2002-11-12 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-02-18 1 174
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2008-05-05 1 165
Maintenance Fee Notice 2010-04-19 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2010-04-19 1 171
Correspondence 1996-09-16 2 63
Fees 2003-12-09 1 28
Fees 1997-12-05 1 35
Fees 1999-02-10 1 34
Fees 1999-12-29 1 30
Correspondence 2005-02-23 2 43
Correspondence 2005-03-02 1 20
Correspondence 2005-03-02 1 21
Fees 2005-02-23 1 35
Fees 2006-01-24 1 27
Fees 2007-01-17 1 31
Fees 2007-12-19 1 29
Correspondence 2008-06-10 2 44
Fees 2008-12-08 1 30