Language selection

Search

Patent 2172448 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2172448
(54) English Title: OPTICAL BRANCH
(54) French Title: BRANCHEMENT OPTIQUE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G02B 06/125 (2006.01)
  • G02B 06/126 (2006.01)
  • G02B 06/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KLEKAMP, AXEL (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • ALCATEL N.V.
(71) Applicants :
  • ALCATEL N.V.
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1996-03-22
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1996-10-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
195 14 042.7 (Germany) 1995-04-13

Abstracts

English Abstract


In an optical branch (1) with a substrate (2) and an integrated waveguide
structure configured into a Y branch, which is used to couple at least one glass fiber, the
waveguide (3) is provided with a constriction that acts as an optical filter before the
branching, and causes the forced radiation of undesirable modes. The constriction
comprises a first taper (4), which reduces the width of the waveguide (3) to a narrow
waveguide section (5) at the inlet to the optical branch (1), and then a mirror-image
second taper (6) widens it to the width of the branching waveguides (branches 7).


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. An optical branch comprising a substrate (2) and an integrated optical
waveguide structure consisting of at least one waveguide (3) for coupling
glass fibers thereto and at least two branching waveguides (7), characterized in that before
the branching point, the waveguide (3) has a constriction.
2. An optical branch as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the
waveguide structure is implemented in the form of cascaded Y branches, and that a
constriction is provided before each branching point.
3. An optical branch as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the
constriction comprises a first taper (4) and a second taper (6), the first taper (4) reducing
the width of the waveguide (3) to a narrow waveguide section (5), and the second taper
(6) subsequently widening the narrow waveguide section (5) again.
4. An optical branch as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the entire
waveguide structure between each branch stage and the respective widening second taper
(6) is formed by constricted waveguide sections (5).
5. An optical branch as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the first taper
(4) is located immediately at an input of the waveguide structure serving to couple a glass
fiber thereto.
6. An optical branch as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the second
taper (6) is located immediately at an output of the waveguide structure serving to couple
a glass fiber thereto.
7. An optical branch as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the
waveguide (3) is approximately 7 µm wide and has a refractive-index step of approxi-
mately 0.004, and that the narrow waveguide section (5) has a width between 6.0 µm and
6.5 µm.

8. An optical branch as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the
waveguide (3) is approximately 7 µm wide and has a refractive-index step of
approximately 0.004, and that the tapers (4, 6), referred to the central axis of the
waveguide (3), have a taper angle .alpha. between approximately 0.1° and 1°.
9. An optical branch as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the entire
waveguide structure between each branch stage and the respective widening second taper
(6) is formed by constricted waveguide sections (5).

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~, 2172448
.
Field of the Invention
The invention concerns an optical branch comprising a s.~ h~te and an integ.~l-
ed optical w-~veg~ide structure con.~i.sting of at least one waveguide for coupling glass
fibers thereto and at least two branching waveguides. Such branches are used e~peci~lly
in optical co~ nications systems.
~3c~ lion of the Prior Art
An optical branch is known from publication EP 0 277 390 B1, wherein optical
waveguides are integrated on a substrate, namely an input waveguide ext~ncling in a
straight line from one end of the s tbsll~e to the opposite end, with two c~c~-lin~
10 branches, each of which contains two limbs. This achieves a distribution of 1:5. In
addition, IOC modules with tree structures implemented by ~c~ding Y branches areknown, which have a distribution of 1:8 e.g. (EP 0 283 301 B1, Figure 34).
Since passive optical distributors have increasingly more ~ignific~nce in new
optical distribution nelwulh~, optical distributors with partition ratios of l:N or 2:N (e.g.
N = 2, 4, 8, 16, 32...) have been designed for coupling single-mode glass fibers (ELEC-
TRONICS Ll~l l~KS, Volume 26, No. 11 of May 24, 1990, pages 707 and 708, and
ELECTRONICS Ll~l l~KS, Volume 27, No. 23 of November 7, 1991, pages 2131-
2133).
The coupling between glass fibers and optical waveguides at the branch inlet is
20 problematic, particularly because of an unavoidable offset belween the glass fiber core
and the optical waveguide. As r~olled in the "IEEE JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE
TECHNOLOGY, Volume 10, No. 11 of November 1992, pages 1570-1573" and in
"OPTICS L~ KS, Volume 16, No. 5 of March 1, 1991, pages 309-311", the offset
itself leads to the undesirable excitation of higher-order modes in w~vegl~ides of the mode
field, which have been adapted to the glass fibers.
As quasi-guided modes, these higher-order modes can hltelÇele over relatively
long distances of several millimeters for example, with one or even several guided modes
in the optical waveguide, and thereby lead to an oscillatory line loss of the guided

2172448
mode(s) along the length of the optical path. This leads to a greater attenuation and, in
the branch areas, to unequal and polarization-dependent distribution of the optical output
to the individual branches as well.
Sullln~ of the Invention
The invention has the task of reducing the optical losses and the polarization-
dependent unequal distribution of light by means of an optical branch comprising a sub-
strate and an integrated optical waveguide structure consicting of at least one waveguide
for coupling glass fibers thereto and at least two branching waveguides, ch~te.;7P~d in
that before the branching point, the waveguide has a constriction. A configuration of the
10 branch includes constriction before each branching point if the wa~eguide structure is in
the form of c~cc~-lP~ Y branches.
The constriction can further comprise a first taper and a second taper, the first
taper reducing the width of the waveguide to a narrow waveguide section, and the second
taper subse~luently widening the narrow waveguide section again.
Furthermore, the entire waveguide structure between each branch stage and the
~eclive widening second taper can be formed by constricted wa~eguide sections.
The optical branch can further be configured so that the first taper is located
immediately at an input of the waveguide structure serving to couple a glass ffber thereto.
The optical branch can also be configured so that the second taper is located
20 immediately at an output of the waveguide structure serving to couple a glass fiber there-
to.

21724~8
Desc~iplion of the DMwinP
The invention is described in greater detail in the following by means of a draw-
ing which scl-e..,At;cally illustrates a configuration example of an optical branch.
Detailed Desc~ lion of the ~ler~lled Embodiment
In the drawing, the optical branch as a whole has the number 1. It comprises a
s.-bsl~te 2 with an inte~ led optical cGI~lponent, which in the configuration example has
the wdveguide structure of a single Y branch.
A waveguide 3 is grown from doped SiO" on the s~bs~l~te 2, which is made of
silicon e.g., and is separated from the latter by a buffer layer. The waveguide 3, which
10 is covered by another buffer layer, is 7 ~m thick for example, and its width is adapted to
the profile of a single-mode fiber. Waveguide cross sections of 7x7 ~m2 are typical. The
refractive index step between waveguide 3 and the buffer layers is 0.004 e.g. Of course,
other mAtenAl~ can be used to construct the op~ical branch 1, such as III-V semiconduc-
tors, quartz glass, lithium-niobate or lithium-tantalate.
The waveguide structure of the substMte 2 on the inlet side of the optical branch
1 compAses an optical waveguide 3, which is used to couple a glass fiber, a first taper 4
co~ ed thereto, and a n~lower waveguide section 5. A s.~l)s~uent second taper 6 is a
mirror-image of the first taper 4, which widens the narrow waveguide section 5 again,
e.g. to the width of the original optical waveguide 3. However, in the example illustrated
20 by the drawing, the second taper 6 widens even more to twice the width of one of the two
outgoing branches 7, each ~f which is as wide as the optical waveguide 3. If nece~A~y to
achieve a defined separation of the branches 7, a gap that inte.lu~ the optical
waveguides can be provided bet~een the second taper 6 and the branches 7 (not
illustrated).
With CA~Ca~1;ng Y branches, the diverging waveguides of each branch have
generally different lengths to the point from where each branch 7 continues with a suit-
able bend 8 at a distance and parallel to the neighboring branch 7.

2172418
The improvement of the optical branch 1 plo~ellies compAses in pareicular
forcing the radiation of undesirable quasi-guided modes in the w~veguide very quickly
over a short path, thereby avoiding the effect of the coherent coupling. This is achieved
by constricting the waveguide 3 (waveguide section 5), which serves as an optical filter,
before it branches off (branches 7). It is imm~teri~l whether the optical wa~eguide struc-
ture consists of buried, planar integrated or strip lines. In the present configuration
example of the optical con-ponent, the constriction is achieved by nal,owing the width of
waveguide 3. However, as an altemative, the constriction can be a waveguide section
whose width has been reduced accordingly.
It was ~el~milled that the inlelrelence effect described above can take place inall disturbances of the waveguide; the constriction can thelc~ro~ be provided for each
optical col,-ponent which contains at least one waveguide that has been disturbed in some
manner, for example by a bend in the line or wherever undesil~ble modes occur; e.g. in
a coupling area between a laser that is integl~ed into the substrate and coupled to a
waveguide, or between other optical co-nponents. The waveguide 3 on the inlet side can
be omitted in this coupling area, as well as in the glass fiber coupling area, and the laser
or the glass fiber can be coupled directly to the base of the first taper 4. This ~..eas.lle
does not affect the intended effect of very quickly sul~lessing the quasi-guided modes,
but it allows the manufacture of optical branches 1 with short lengths.
If the source of the disturbance producing undesirable modes is the bend 8 in a
waveguide (branch 7), the constriction is located behind the bend in such a way, that the
constriction encompasses the bent waveguide. This allows the length of the constricted
linear waveguide to be shorter. With c~cading cG.--pollel-ts in general, the entire
waveguide area belweell the branching steps can be configured for a reduced wa~eguide
width, so that the entire waveguide path up to the widening taper of the next ~lanching
step is constricted and functions as an optical filter. This allows the manufactured length
to be shortened even further.

2172448
,~".
.
If the second taper 6 forms the outgoing end of the waveguide structure, it can
be used to directly couple a glass fiber or another component, or a linear waveguide can
be connected to the taper (6), to which the glass fiber or another col..pollent is coupled.
The dimensions of the constriction depend on the design of the optical compo-
nent. Designs of 1300 nm and 1550 nm wavelengths are typical. In an optical branch 1
with integrated waveguides that are about 7 ,um wide, the tapers 4, 6 have a taper angle a
that is e.g. 0.1 to 1.0 with reference to the central axis of the waveguide 3, a
wdveguide section 5 that is between about 6.0 ~m and 6.5~m wide, and is applo~imately
lmm to 4 mm long, including the first taper 4.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1999-03-22
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1999-03-22
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1998-03-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1996-10-14

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1998-03-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALCATEL N.V.
Past Owners on Record
AXEL KLEKAMP
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1996-06-26 1 16
Description 1996-06-26 5 206
Claims 1996-06-26 2 53
Drawings 1996-06-26 1 8
Representative drawing 1997-11-20 1 7
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1997-11-24 1 111
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1998-04-19 1 186