Language selection

Search

Patent 2175335 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2175335
(54) English Title: SPRAY DRYING PROCESS FOR MAKING A LOW OR NIL PHOSPHATE AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING DETERGENT COMPOSITION
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE SECHAGE PAR PULVERISATION DESTINE A PRODUIRE UNE COMPOSITION DETERGENTE POUR LAVE-VAISSELLE, CONTENANT TRES PEU OU PAS DE PHOSPHATES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C11D 11/02 (2006.01)
  • C11D 03/08 (2006.01)
  • C11D 03/37 (2006.01)
  • C11D 17/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • JOLICOEUR, JOHN MICHAEL (United States of America)
  • WANDSTRAT, EDWARD JOSEPH (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: DIMOCK STRATTON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1994-10-11
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-05-11
Examination requested: 1996-04-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1994/011516
(87) International Publication Number: US1994011516
(85) National Entry: 1996-04-29

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/146,351 (United States of America) 1993-11-01

Abstracts

English Abstract


The present invention relates to a process for making a high bulk density granular automatic dishwashing detergent composition
comprising spray drying a mixture of alkali metal silicate and water soluble organic polymer. The spray dried granule is combined with
conventional nonphosphate automatic dishwashing detergent ingredients to form a final product.


French Abstract

L'invention se rapporte à un procédé de fabrication d'une composition détergente granulaire à masse volumique en vrac élevée, destinée aux lave-vaisselle, ce procédé consistant à sécher par pulvérisation un mélange d'un silicate de métal alcalin et d'un polymère organique soluble dans l'eau. On combine le granulé séché par pulvérisation à des ingrédients détersifs habituels sans phosphates, pour lave-vaisselle, afin d'obtenir un produit final.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


15
1. A process for making high bulk density granular automatic dishwashing detergent composition
comprising:
(a) spray drying a mixture comprising from 20% to 90%, by weight of said mixture, of
neutralized or alkali metal silicate solution and from 5% to 30%, by weight of said
mixture, of water-soluble organic polymer solution to form free flowing granules; and
(b) combining from 20% to 80%, by weight of said composition, of said granules of step (a)
with from 1% to 90% of a non-phosphate detergent builder,
wherein said composition having a bulk density of greater than 0.7 grams/cc and less than 0.5%
phosphate in the form of phosphorous.
2. The process of Claim 1 wherein step (a) comprises from 40% to 70% of said alkali metal silicate
solution from 20% to 80% of said non-phosphate detergency builder.
3. The process of Claim 1 or 2 wherein said combining of step (b) is by agglomerating, spray drying,
dry mixing or combinations thereof, preferably agglomerating or dry mixing.
4. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said detergency builder is selected from the
group consisting of water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium carbonates,
borates, polyhydroxysulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and mixtures thereof.
preferably from 15% to 20% sodium carbonate and from 8% to 20% sodium citrate.
5. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein step (a) further comprises from 0.1% to
10% of a low foaming nonionic surfactant comprising a C16-20 straight chain alcohol condensed with
an average of from 6 to 15 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, preferably a C18 alcohol
condensed with an average of from 7 to 9 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
6. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said water-soluble organic polymer of step
(a) is selected from the group consisting of aqueous solutions of alkali metal salts of polyacrylates with
an average molecular weight in acid form of from 1,000 to 10,000, and acrylate/maleate or
acrylate/fumarate copolymers with an average molecular weight in acid form of from 2,000 to 80,000
and a ratio of acrylate to maleate or fumarate segments of from 30:1 to 2:1, and mixtures thereof.
7. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said alkali metal silicate solution comprises
from 30% to 60% water and said water-soluble organic polymer solution comprises from 10% to 70%
water.

16
8. The process of any one of the preceding claims further comprising step (c) admixing in an amount of
bleach sufficient to provide the composition with 0.1% to 5% of available chlorine or available oxygen
based on the weight of the detergent composition preferably the chorine bleach is chlorocyanurate.
9. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said alkali metal silicate has a ratio of
SiO2:M2O of from 16 to 3.0:1, preferably from 2.0:1 to 2.4:1.wherein M is K+ or Na+ or mixtures
thereof.
10. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said low foaming nonionic surfactant of
step (a) further comprises a polyoxypropylene, polyoxyethylene block polymeric compound and/or from
2% to 20% of an alkyl phosphate ester suds suppressor.
11. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein said granules of step (a) are agglomerated
in step (b) with sald detergency builder and from 3% to 45%, of a liquid binder selected from tbe group
consisting of water, aqueous solutions of alkali metal salts of polycarboxylic acid, liquid silicate,
nonionic surfactant, and mixtures thereof and wherein in step (b) further comprises anionic surfactants
selected from the group consisting of alkyl sulfonates containing from 8 to 20 carbon atoms, alkyl
benzene sulfonates containing from 6 to 13 carbon atoms in the carbon atoms in the alkyl group and the
mono- and/or dialkyl phenyl oxide, mono and/or di-sulfonates wherein the alkyl groups contain from 6
to 16 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof
12. The process of any one of the preceding claims wherein from 40% to 70% of said
polyoxypropylene, polyoxyethylene block polymeric compound is 75%, by weight of the compound, of
a reverse block copolymer of polyoxyethylene and polyoxypropylene containing 17 moles of ethylene
oxide and 44 moles of propylene oxide; and 25 %, by weight of the compound, of a block co-polymer of
polyoxyethylene and polyoxypropylene, initiated with trimethyl propane, containing 99 moles of
propylene oxide and 24 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of trimethylol propane.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


wo 95112651 2 t 7 ~ 3 3 5 PCTIUS9~/1151fi
Spray dry~ng process for mak1ng a low or n~l phosphate
automat1c d1shwashlng detergent compos1t~on
T~('T-T~I('AT.FJFr n
The present invention relates to a process for spray drying cu,.,p~ of
high bulk density low or nil phosphate granular automatic di~h~aa;lillg detergent
C In l,~L~,ul~ly, the invention relates to forming granules by spray
10 drying alkali metal silicate and water-soluble polymer.
BA('KGROUND OF T~ VENTIO~
Granular automatic diallw~lalli~lg detergent '~ " and their
CIJ.I.~ , e.g. builders, alkaline salts, sodium silicate, low-foaming sllrf~ f~nfc
chlorine bleach, etc, are well known in the art. A number of processes have been15 described for the production of such diallw~a;lillg detergent .
Generally, ~.~cl;-~ and/or admixing techniques are used in
~. .r.. 1...;..~ a granular automatic diall~ g detergent c~ For
example, U.S. Patent 4,379,069, Rapisarda et al., issued April 5, 1983, U.S.
Patents 4,427,417, Porasik, issued January 24, 1984, and 3,888,781, Kingry et
al., issued June 10, 1975. However, because of the demand for compact detergent
~, . alternate mcans must be found for il~u.l!ulaL~ high levels of liquid
(i.e. nonionic surfactant, pul~ laL~:, and the like) as the amount of
solid . decreases.
Spray drying techniques have been employed in producing laundry
detergents; however, spray drying processes have not been ~At~ applied to
automati6 dia;~ detergents because the process often results in low bulk
density products. In addition, because of phosphate reversion during spray drying
(resulting in insoluble residue) this process had been avoidcd for traditional
phosphate containing automatic diallw~all;llg detergent formulas.
It has now been found that a nil or low-phosphate, high bullc density granular
automatic d;all ' detergent ~ l can be achieved by spray drying an
aqueous mixture of alkali metal silicate and water-soluble organic polymer (i.e.~ul~ ' ) and combining the resulting granule with ,' p~ automatic
~' ~l,il~g detergent ingredients. The ingredients may be combined by post
admixing dry solids andlor ~plr~mPr~in~ to achieve the desired high bulk density

WO gS112651 PCT/US9 1/11516
2t7s33'j ~
product of greater than about 0.7 grams/cc. Surprisingly, the . o ,~ can
clean dishware as effectively as phosphate containing .~
.
SUMMARY OF TH~ INVF'`ITION
The present invention . ~ processes for making low or nil
5 phosphate, high bullc density granular automatic di~l~w~ detergent f~f m~ci~ifm
c~ 6-
(a) spray drying a mixture comprising from about 20% to about 90%, byweight of said mixture, of alkali metal silicate solution and from about
5% to about 30%, by weight of said mixture, of water-soluble organic
polymer solution to form free flowing gr,nules; and
(b) combining from about 20% to about 80%, by weight of said
of said granules of step (a) with from about 1% to about
90% of non-phosphate detergent builder;
wherein said . , has a bulk density of greater than about 0.7 grams/cc and
15 less than about 0.5% phosphate in the form of l , ' ~,u~.
Preferably a ~ ' product is desired wherein the spray dried granules
and non-phosphate detergent builder are admixed. The . , also preferably
comprises nonionic surfactant, enzymes and oxygen bleach.
DETATT T-T~ ~F~iCl~TT'TION OF I~TF INVFl`lTlON
The granular detergent ~ process of the present invention
comprises spray drying a mixture of alkali metal silicate and water-soluble organic
polymer to form free flowing granules; and combining said granules with non-
phosphate detergent builder. Low foaming nonionic surfactant and bleach are
25 preferable optional ingredients. The component materials are described in detail
below.
A~li Mf~
The _ . ~ of the type described herein deliver their bleach and
alk,linity tJ the wash water very quickly. ~ " they can be aggressive to
30 metals, dishware, and other materials, which can result in either riicrolf~l~ti-~m by
etching, chemical reaction, etc. or weight loss. The alkali metal silicates
hereinafter described provide protection against cosion of metals and against
attack on dishware, including fine china and glassware.
The SiO level should be from about 4% to about 25%, preferably from
35 about 5% to about 20%, more preferably from about 6% to about 15%, based on
the weight of the automatic d;~l" ' Q detergent: , The ratio of SiO
to the alkali metal oxide (M2O, where M=alkali metal) is typically from about I

WO95/12651 21 7~3~S PCT/VS9~/11!i16
to about 3.2, preferably from about 1.6 to about 3, more prefesbly from about 2
to about 2.4. The alkali metal silicate is an aqueous solution, having from about
30% to about 60%, more preferably from about 40% to about 50% water.
The present invention comprises spray drying a mixture containing water-
roluble organic polymer discussed herein below and from about 20% to about
90%, preferably from about 40% to about 70æalkali metal silicate solution.
~'' '~' ''~ C& Polymer
The water soluble organic polymer, is employed in the present invention at
levels from about 0.1% to about 20%, preferably from about 1% to about 10%,
most preferably from about 3% to about 8%, by weight of the . . The
water-soluble organic polymer is in aqueous solutions and can be alkali metal salts
of a ~Iy~bu)~ylic acid.
The aqueous solution of a water-soluble polymer can comprise from about
10% to about 70%, preferably from about 20% to about 60%, more preferably
from about 30% to about 50%, most preferably from about 40% to about 50%, by
weight of the water-soluble polymer of water. The aqueous rolution of a water-
soluble polymer comprises from about 5% to about 30%, by weight of the spray
dry mixture.
Solutions of the film-forming polymers described in U.S. Pat. No.
4,379,080 (Murphy), issued Apr. 5, 1983, r ' ~ herein by reference, can
be used as the water-soluble organic polymer of the present invention.
Suitable polymers for use in the aqueous solutions are at least partially
neutralized or aL~cali metal,: or substituted (e.g., mono-, di-
or i ' ) salts of PUIY~bUA.~I~C acids, excluding those with
potential '' ' ' ~ or explosive properties. Wherl the sodium silicate and
polymer are spray dried together the acid form of the polymer should be avoided
ro that interaction with the silicate does not occur. The alkali metal, especially
sodium ~;alts are most preferred. While the molecular weight of the polymer can
vary over a wide range, it preferably is from about 1,000 to about 500,v00, morepreferably from about 2,000 to about 25û,000, and most preferably is from about
3,000 to about 100,000.
Other suitable pvlymers include those disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
3,3v8,067 issued March 7, 1967, to Diehl, i.,~ull ~ herein by reference.
Unsaturated acids that can be l,ul~ ~i to form suitable polymeric
35 pulJ~buA.y' include acrylic acid, maleic acid (or maleic anhydride), fumaric
acid, itaconic acid, aconitic acid, mesaconic acid, citraconic acid and
.~tl-J~ ' acid. The presence of . ~ segments containing no
lbVA.y' ' radicals such as ~;-.y' ' ~1 ether, styrene, ethylene, etc. is suitable

W095112651 ,, PCTIUS9~1/11516
2~533S 4
provided that such segments do not constitute more than about 40% by weight of
the polymer.
Other examples of suitable polymers for use herein are ~ u~ol~ of
acrylamide and acrylate having a molecular weight of from about 3,000 to about
100,000, preferably from about 4,000 to about 20,000, and an acrylamide content
of less than about 50%, preferably less than about 20%, by weight of the polymer.
Most preferably, the polymer has a mole~ular weight of from about 4,000 to about20,000 and an acrylamide content of from about 0% to about 15%, by weight of
the polymer.
Particularly preferred are aqueous solutions of poly~ ' with an average
molecular weight in acid form of from about 1,000 to about 10,000, and
acrylate/maleate or acrylate/fumarate cul,ul,~ with an average molecular
weight in acid form of from about 2,000 to about 8û,000 and a ratio of acrylate of
maleate or fumarate segments of from about 30:1 to about 2:1. This and other
suitable .u~l.~ based on a mixture of . J mono- and d;~buAy-
monomers are disclosed in E~uropean Patent Application No. 66,915, published
December 15, 1982, . ' herein by reference.
Other polymers useful herein include the pul~. l}.~l...~ glycols and
~IY~UIUIJJI~ glycols having a molecular weight of from about 950 to about
30,000 which carl be obtained from the Dow Chemical Company of Midland,
Michigan. Such li ' for example, having a melting point within the range
of from about 30O to about 100oC can be obtained at molecular weights of 1450,
3400, 4500, 6000, 7400, 9500, and 2û,000. Such r ~ are formed by the
pul~ iu~ of ethylene glycol or propylene glycol with the requisite number of
moles of ethylene or propylene oxide to provide the desired molecular weight andmelting point of the respective pul~. II,yl~ glycol and POIY~UIU~UJh~ glycol.
The ~ulJ. IhJI~ , pul~ul~ and mixed glycols are ~UII~I ' 'l~/
referredTo by means of the structural formula
CH CH
1 3 1 3
XO-(CH2-CH20)m-(CH2-CHO)n-(CH-CH20)o-H
wherein m, n, and o are integers satisfying the molecular weight and
given above.
Other polymers useful herein include the cellulose sulfate esters such as
cellulose acetate sulfate, cellulose sulfate, IIYdIUA.~t;IJI cellulose sulfate~
I-.~,lhJ' " ' sulfate, and l~d~uAy~JIu~u~ llulu~ sulfate. Sodium cellulose
sulfate is the most preferred polymer of this group.

~ WO 9S/126S1 21 7~ 3s PCT/US94111516
(-~ 5 ~
C~IIUA~' ' ~I~Y~- ~1....,.1.~ are also suitable polymers, IJ~uLi~.ul~lLly
starches, celluloses and alginates, described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,723,322, Diehl,~, issued Mar. 27, 1973; the dextrin esters of polywbu,~ylic acids disclosed in U.S.
Pat. No. 3,929,107, Thompson, issued Nov. 11, 1975; the hydroAyalkyl starch
5 ethers, starch esters, oxidized starches, dextrins and starch l,.~Jlul~ described
in U.S. Pat No. 3,803,285, Jensen, issued Apr. 9, 1974; and the ~buA~ Lcd
starches described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,629,121, Eldib, issued Dec. 21, 1971; and
the dextrin starches described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,141,841, ~ n~lltl, issued Feb.27, 1979; all . ' herein by reference. These polymers are also often
10 referred to as thickeners. Preferred polymers of the above group are the
wbuA~ Lllrl celluloses.
Other useful l,uly~ ' are The term modified pUI~ ' ' is defined as a
copolymer which contains as monomer units: a) from about 90% to about 10%,
prefesbly from about 80% to about 20% by weight acrylic acid or its salts and b)15 from about 10% to about 90%, preferably from about 20% to about 80% by
weight of a substituted acrylic monomer or its salts having the general formula:
IR2 Rll
- [ C - C ] -

C = O
o
I
R
wherein at least one of the ' 'l R, R or R, preferably R or R is a 1 to
4 carbon aIkyl or llydluA~all~l group, R or R can be a hydrogen and R can be
a hydrogen or all~ali metal salt. Most preferred is a substituted acrylic monomer
wherein R is methyl, R is hydrogen and R is sodium.
3û The low molecular weight ~ol~ ' preferably has a molecular weight of
less than about 15,000, preferably from about 500 to about 10,000, most
preferably from about 1,000 to about 5,000. The most preferred ~ulr~ly'
copolymer has a molecular weight of 3500 and is about 70% by weight acrylic acidand about 3û% by weight methyl acrylic acid.
Suitable modified l)UI~ ly' ~o~ include the low molecular weight
cu~ul.~ .s of I ' aliphatic carboxylic acids as disclosed in U.S. Patent
4,530,766, and S,084,535, both of which are , ' herein by reference.

WO 95/12651 PCT/US94/11516 ~
2~'1s33~ --
In general, the water-soluble organic polymer can comprise any one or a
mixture of the polymers described above.
Non- ' ' Detereency ~uilder
The detergency builders used can be any of the non-phosphate detergency builders known in the art, which include the various water-soluble, alkali metal,
or substituted carbonates, borates, pOl~ uAy r ,
~ ~llb~JA,~- ' (e.g. citrates), and ~vly~L~uAJ- Preferred are the
alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of the above and mixtures thereof.
The builder is present in the automatic d;ahw~ all;ll~ detergent ~ in
10 an amount from about 1% to about 90%, preferably frûm about, 5% to about
80%, most preferably 15% to about 75%, by weight, of the automatic d;allw lalu
detergent .
Examples of non-l' ,' ua, inorganic builders are aodium and potassium
carbonate, L,;~uL , , ' and hydroxide.
Water-soluble, non-l- ,' ua organic builders useful herein include the
various alkali n al,: and substituted: polyacetates,
~UbVA~ pVI~-~lUbVA~- ' and ~vl.~l-ydluA~aulfonates. Examples of
and ~vly~ubvA~- builders are the aOdium, potassium, lithium,
and substituted salts ûf ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid,
20 . ~ acid, tartrate l acid, tartrate disuccinic acid,
UAyl~ u~;~l;C acid, carboAy ' ~lu~ ~ acid, mellitic acid, benzene
pul~l vA~ acids, and citric acid.
Preferred detergency builders have the ability to remove metal ions other
than al~ali metal ions from washing solutions by ~ l~ which as defined
25 herein includes chelation, or by IJlC~;~;laL~V~ reactions. Although sodium
lI;~1VI~1- ,- has generally been a particularly preferred detergency builder
material, sodium citrate is preferred to reduce the total r- .~ ua level of the
of the invention.
P~uli~ul~l.~ preferred automatic d;~ , detergent , of the
30 invention contain, by weight of the ~ . from about 5% to about 40%,
preferably from about 10% to about 30%, most preferably from about 15% to
about 25X, of sodium carbonate. P~ull~.uldlly preferred sodium citrate with levels
from about 5% to about 40%, preferably from about 7% to 30%, most preferably
from about 8% to about 20%, by weight of the . are also present
Low ~ ~ Nonionic Surfactant ~

- W0951126SI ~ .` i PCT/US94111516
21 7533S 7 -
The low foaming nonionic surfactants of the present invention are from
about 0.1% to about 10%, preferably from about 0.5% to about 5%, by weight of
tbe c~ o~
Herein, by "low foaming" is meant that the nonionic surfactant is suitable for
use in an automatic dishwasher.
Reduced surfactant mobility is a ~ in stability of the optional
bleach , Preferred surfactant ~ s with relatively low solubility
can be ~ ' in . . on~ containing alkali metal ~' ' ' u.,~ or
other organic chlorine bleaches without an interaction that results in loss of
available chlorine. The nature of this problem is disclosed in U.S. Patent
4,309,299 issued January 5, 1982 to Rapisarda et al and in U.S. Patent 3,359,207,
issued December 19, 1967, to Kaneko et al, both patents being iII~,UI~ ' ~ herein
by reference.
In a preferred ' :' t, the surfactant is ar~ IUA~' ' ' surfactant
derived from the reaction of a lllù.~ll.ydluAy alcohol or aLIcylphenol containing
from about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, excluding cyclic carbon atoms, with from
about 6 to about 15 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol or alkyl phenol on
an average basis.
A r . '` ~ preferred ctlluAy' ' nonionic surfactant is derived from a
straight chairl fatty alcohol containing from about 16 to about 20 carbon atoms
(C alcohol), preferably a C alcohol, condensed with an average of from
about tPto about 15 moles, prefera~ly from about 7 to about 12 moles, and most
preferably from about 7 to about 9 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
Preferably the: ' y' ' nonionic surfactant so derived has a narrow ethoxylate
~ ' relative to the average.
The e~vAy' ' nonionic surfactant can optionally contain propylene oxide
in an amount up to about 15 % by weight of the surfactant and retain the
advantages hereinafter described. Preferred surfactants of tbe invention can be
prepared by tne processes described in U.S. Patent 4,223,163, issued September
16, 1980, Guilloty, I ' herein by reference.
The most preferred ~ . contains the .~LIIOA~
t.1dlUA,~ I ' ' or alkyl phenol and additionally comprises a
PVI~VA~ IU~ yUI~UA~.Uy~ block polymeric compound; the Cl1lUA~
' /dIUAY alcohol or alkyl phenol nonionic surfactant . lg from about
20% to aboout 80%, preferably from about 30% to about 70%, of the total
surfactant; , by weight.
Suitable block pOlyuAy~ ylullc PUIYUA~ UYYI~ polymeric ~ - l, ' that
meet the ~ described ll~.c;l.b~fvlc include those based on ethylene

WO 95~12651 PCTNS94/11516
2t~s33~ --
glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, trimethylolpropaDe and ethyl~ ,;". as the
initiator reactive hydrogen compound. Polymeric c~ u ,.l. made from a
sequential c;LlluA~ldiu~ aDd ~lu~uA~l~diull of initiator .~ . ' with a single
reactive hydrogen atom, such as C 2 18 aliphatic alcohols, do not provide
5 i~L;,r~Luly suds control in the detergent , of the invention. Certain of
the block polymer surfactant , _ ' designated PLURONIC(!3 aDd
TETRONlCæ by the BASF-WyaDdotte Corp., U'~. ' , Michigan, are suitable
in the surfactant . , of the invention.
A ,u~uLi~ ul,ul~ preferred ~ ~ " contains from about 40% to about 70%
10 of a ~ulyuA~uluAu.~ , PUI~UA~ IUIIC block polymer blend comprising about
75%, by weight of the blend, of a reverse block co-polymer of ~I~UA~
and ~I~UA~IU~)jlUII~ containing 17 moles of ethylene oxide and 44 moles of
propylene oxide; and about 25%, by weight of the blend, of a block co-polymer of~UIyUA~ and ~UI~VAy~lU~ iDitiated with tri-methylol propane,
15 containing 99 moles of propylene oxi~e and 24 moles of ethylene oxide per mole
of trimethylol propane.
Because of the relatively high POI~UA~IU~IU~IC content, e.g, up to about
90% of the bloclc ~I~UA~ ~IYUA~JIU~ - polymeric ~ , ' of the
invention and p--~ii ly when the pul~uA~IJlu~ .l., chains are in the termiDal
20 position, the , are suitable for use in the surfactaDt .~ of the
invention and have relatively low cloud points. Cloud points of 1% solutions in
water are typically below about 32C and preferably frc~ about 15C to about
30C for optimum control of sudsing throughout a full range of water
aDd water l.~u '
25 t~h~r Sllrf~tsr~tc
The , herein can contain other 511rf:~t9-1~C The surfactant can be
present in the , in ar~ amount from about 0.1% to about 10%,
preferabig from about 0.5% to about 5%, by weight of the
Suitable surfactants include anionic surfactants including alkyl sulfonates
30 containing from about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, alkyl benzene sulfonates
containing from about 6 to about 13 carbon atoms in the allcyl group, and the
preferred 1~,.. ' mono- and/or diallcyl phenyl oxide mono- and/or di-
sulfonates wherein the alkyl groups contain from about 6 to about 16 earbon atoms
are also useful in the present invention. All of these anionic surfactants are used as
35 stable salts, preferahly sodium and/or potassium.
Other su~faetants also inelude trialkyl amine oxides, betaines, etc. which are
usually high sudsing. A disclosure of bleach-stable surfactants can be found in
published British Patent Applieation No. 2,116,199A; U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,027,

WO 95/12651 PCT/US94111516
~1 7~33S ~ ~ ~
Hartman; U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,851, Rupe et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,84g,
Leikhim, all of which are ill~Ul~f ' herein by reference. Because of the high
sudsing, suds ,, ~ VI j discussed l~c~c;lll~clv .. are also preferred.
The preferred surfactants of the invention in f~ ~ with the other
5 ; . of the , provide excellent cleaning and ' 7
p..~ from the standpoint of residual spotting and filming. In these
respects, the preferred surfactants of the invenvion provide generally superior
r relative to c.I-v7.~ ' nonionic surfactants with llydlv~vlJ;c groups
ovher than ' ~dlu~y alcohols and alkyl-phenols, for exarnple, poly~lu~,.e
lû oxide or pVI~ulU~l~ ûxide in ~. .l ';~- with diols, triols and other
pulJ~,ly~ls or diamines.
Rlf~rh ~
The f o..~ , of the invention optionally contain an amount of bleach
sufficient to provide the cf. ~ ;.". with from 0% to about 5%, preferably from
about 0.1% to about 5.0%, most preferably from about 0.5% to about 3.0%, of
available chlorine or available oxygen based on the weight of the detergent
An inorganic chlorine bleach ingredient such as chl ' trisodium
phosphate can be utilized, but organic chlorine bleaches such as the
l ' u~"~ are preferred. Water-soluble di~ lv~uu~. such as sodium
or potassium ~' ' ..;~j dihydrate are p4. i '~, preferred.
The detergent , ' ' according to the present invention
can contain bleach , other than the chlorine type. For example,
oxygen-type bleaches described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,412,934 (Chung et al), issued
Nov. 1, 1983, and peroxyacid bleaches described in European Patent Application
û33,2259, Sagel et al, published Sept. 13, 1989, both r ' herein by
reference, can be used as a partial or complete lc. ' of the chlorine bleach
ingrediem described },~ l~fvlc. These oxygen bleaches are ~iuul~ly
preferred when it is desirable to reduce the total chlorine content or use en~yme in
the . , of the invention.
Othf~r Optinn ~I Tn,L7r~rliPn~c
The automatic d;~h. _ ~ of the invention can optionally
contain up to about 50%, preferably from about 2% to about 20%, most preferably
less than about 5%, based on the weight of the surfactant, of an alkyl phosphateester suds suppressor.
Suitable alkyl phosphate esters are disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,314,891,
issued April 18, 1967, to Schmolka et al, pvld~cd herein by reference.

WO 95/12651 PCT/llS94/11516
?.~7533S
The preferred alkyl phosphate esters contain from 16-20 carbon atoms.
Highly preferred alkyl phosphate esters are ~ lC/ It~yl acid phosphate or
monooleyl acid phosphate, or salts thereof, ~ ul~uly alkali metal salts, or
mixtures thereof.
The allcyl phosphate esters have been used to reduce the sudsing of detergent
c~ suitable for use in automatic di~l~w~1l;~l6 machines. The esters are
J~uli~ul~uly effective for reducing the sudsing of ~ comprising nonionic
surfactants which are block polymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide.
Filler rnaterials can also be present including sucrose, sucrose esters, sodium
10 chloride, sodium sulfate, potassium chloride, potassium sulfate, etc., in amounts
up to about 70%, preferably from 0% to about 40%.
Perfumes (stable as to odor); dyes (such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent
4,714,562, Roselle et al, issued December 22, 1987); and enzymes and crystal
modifiers and the like can also be added to the presPnt ~ o~ c in ~
15 amounts. Other commonly used detergent ingredients can also be included.
Additional silicate may also be added to the ~" ~p~ in the form of solid
silicate. Preferably, the solid alkali metal silicate is hydrous, having from about
15% io about 25% water, more preferably, from about 17% to about 20%.
The highly alkaline mPt~ cil can be employed, although the less alkaline
20 hydrous alkali metal silicates having a SiO :M O ratio of from about 2.0 to about
2.4 are preferred. Anhydrous forms of the alkali metal silicates with a SiO :M Oratio of 2.0 or more are less preferred because they tend to be ~;6..;rl~l~1y less
soluble than the hydrous alkali metal silicates having the same ratio.
Sodium and potassium, and especially sodium, silicates arc preferred. A
25 particularly preferred all~ali metal silicate is a granular hydrous sodium silicate
having a SiO :Na O ratio of from 2.0 to 2.4 available from PQ Corporation,
named Britesil~) H20 and BritesilE9 H24. Most preferred is a granular hydrous
sodium srlicate having a SiO :Na2O ratio of 2Ø
While typical forms, i e. powder and granular, of hydrous silicate particles
30 are suitable, preferred silicate particles have a mean particle size between about
300 and about 900 microns with less than 40% smaller than 150 microns and less
than 5% larger than 1700 microns. Pa~ ,ul~ly preferred is a silicate particle with
a mean particle size between about 400 and about 700 microns with less than 20%
smaller than 150 microns and less than 1% larger than 1700 microns.
3~ Althou~h some phosphate containing ingredients may be added to the
the present invention contains less than about 0.5% phosphate in the
form Of l'l'''`IJ '''
The Pr~P~cc

W095112651 PCTIUS9~/llS16
~ 21 7S33S i~ ' ,l ~,
Il
In step (a), a mixture of 20% to about 90%, preferably from about 40% to
about 70%, aqueous aLcali metal silicate solution and from about 5% to about 30%aqueous puly~ J- solution, is spray dried to form free flowing granules.
Applicable spray drying processes are described in U.S. Patents 4,715,979, Moore3 5 et al., issued December 29, 1987, 4,963,226, I'h~rnh~rl -;n et al., issued October
16, 1990 and 4,344,871, Allaway et al., issued August 17, 1982 are il~,UI~ ' '
herein by reference. Other ingredients may optionally be added to the mixture.
Examples of suitable ingredients include alkali metal carbonates (i.e. sodium
carbonate), nonionic surfactant, and fillers (i.e. sodium sulfate). Ingredients are
10 selected for this step based upon their stability and safety. Safety protocols should
be used to evaluate the ~ y~ explosivity and ~ ;-- potential of the
materials used during spray drying.
The next step is to combine the spray dried granules of step (a) with non-
phosphate detergency builder (i.e. sodium citrate), and optional ingredients (i.e.
15 low foaming nonionic surfactant and bleaching agent), using any suitable batch or
continuous mixing process, so long as a i.~. --,o..l..,- mixture results therefrom.
A preferred ' " is an admixture containing a spray dried ~", ,.l. .~...,-
phosphate detergency builder weight ratio of between about 1:20 and about 10:1,
l~ih~ly~ more preferably between about 1:12 and about 5:1, most preferably
between about 1:3 and about 2:1.
An alternate method, where admixing the ingredients does not yield the
desired product bullc densiq, consists of 5L~ the ingredients of step (b)
and/or the granules of step (a) with ingredients of step (b). ~g'
equipment which facilitates mi~cing and intimate contacting of a liquid binder
(preferably ælected from the group consisting of water, solutions of aqueous aL~ali
metal salts of poly~ltuAylic acid, liquid silicate, nonionic surfactant and mixtures
thereof) with dry detergent ingredients such that it results in agg'
granules. Suitable mixing devices include vertical ag~'- (e.g. Schugi
Flexomix or Bepex Turboflex ,,,,' ) rotating drums, inclined pan
~ O'Brien mixers, and any other device with suitable means of
agitation and liquid spray-on Methods of agitating, mixing, and 5~Lo~ ;,.g
particulate . are well-known to those skilled in the art. The apparatus
may be designed or adapted for either continuous or batch operation as long as the
essential process steps can be achieved.
Once ~' l, the product preferably goes through a " " step
(' " g is defined herein as that processing necessary to allow the base
granule to come to , ' ' with respect to ~ and moisture content.
This could involve drying off excess water introduced with the liquid binder via

WO9S1126S1 217~335 12 PCT/US9.1~11516
suitable drying equipment including fluidized beds, rotary drums, etc. The free
moisture content of the base granule should be less than about 10%, preferably less
than about 5%. As used herein, free-moisture content is tlrtr-minr'i by placing 5
grams of a sample of base detergent granules in a petri dish, placing the sample in
a convection oven at 50C (122F) for 2 hours, followed by - oE the
weight loss due to water ~ ... If the liquid binder does not introduce an
excess of water, " ~ may involve merely allowing time to reach
, ' ' before admixing additional ingredients.
In cases where the c~ contain hydratable salts, it is preferable to
10 hydrate them prior to the ..~cl~ \ step using the hydration process described in, e.g. U.S. Patent No. 4,427,417 issued January 24, 1984 to Porasik,
iIIWI,I,)I ' ' h~rein by reference.
After 1~' the final step is to admix the :~c~ l granules with
other optional detergent ingredients, such as solid silicate and bleaching agent,
15 using any suitable batch or continuous process as discussed l-~ ,~uv~.
Optional process steps include screening and/or pre-mixing of dry detergent
ingredients before -~, cl.. ~ pre-hydration of hydratable salts, and screening
and/or grinding of the base granule or final product to any desired particle size.
C~~ ' automatic d;~h~ ' ~ detergent ,~ are preferred
20 herein. C, containing greater than about 60% active ingredients,
preferably between about 70% and about 95% active ingredients are preferred.
Preferably, from about 5% to about 98%, most preferably from about 10% to
about 50%, of the automatic d;.,t.~h;..g detergent . is detergency
builder, and from about 2% to about 80%, preferably from about 20% to about
25 40%, is spray dried granules comprising silicate and water-soluble organic
polymer.
As used herein, all p~ parts, and ratios are by weight unless
u~h~. w;~: '
The following ' Examples illustrate the process of the invention
30 and facilitate its ~ ' " l,.
FX~MPLF I
The following . ~ are prepared by first forming spray dried
granules followed by admixing the remaining dry O " The , are
set forth in Table 1.
.Table I
Wt.% ûfDeter~ent Cvl~ ;u

W095~12651 21 7533S l PCI/US9~/11516
13
A
Spray Dried Granule ('o" ,rn~ ~
Sodium ~ly~ yldt~ 4.29
ALkali Metal Silicate 10.26
5Sodium carbonate 14.28
FinAI Product TnE~~ ntc
Spray Dried Solid Granule 28.83
Sodium carbonate 14.03
Sodium sulfate 8.23
Sodium citrate 14.28
Nonionic surfactant (1) 3.62
Hydrous sodium silicate (2) 18.16
Bleach 2.65
Water --balance--
(1) Blend, by weight of total surfactant, of 38.7% l~u~ul~ydlu~y (C )
alcohol which has been ~LIIu,~y' ' with 8 moles of ethylene oxide per
mole of alcohol, 58.1% of polyu,~yl,lul,yl.lle/polyu,.~llyl~.l. reverse
block polymer and 3.2% I~uilu~t~uyl~ id phûsphate.
(2) 2.0 ratio SiO2:Na20 Britesil~) H20.
F.XAMPT F :rT
The automatic di~ g detergent ~ .JIlllNJ~ set forth in Table 2
are prepared by (a) spray drying alkali metal silicate and water soluble
organic polymer with other . , , (b) ~ AI;~ e and fluid bed
drying the spray dried granules with various detergent ingredients and (c)
25 admixing solid silicate and/or bleach.
Table 2
Wt.% of D~trreent
Cu..,~
30 B C n
Spray DriPA (~IrAn~
Sodium poly~.,ly' 5.56 5.56 5.56
Alkali Metal Silicate 13.30 13.3û 17.88
Sodium carbonate 18.52 9.26 6.17
35Nonionic surfactant(l) 4.78 4.78
Sodium sulfate 10.67 10.67
rvly~ Thickener(2) - 2.00
gJ~lTUTE SHEET (RULE 2b~
,

WO95/12651 PCT/US9~/11516 ~
217533~ 14
Fin~l Product ~
SprayDried Solid Granule 37.38 45.57 45.06
Sodium carbonate 9.26 12.35
Sodium sulfate 10.67 - -
__ Sodium citrate 18.52 18.52 18.52
Nonionic surfactant (1) 4.78
Liquid silicate 9.94 9.94 10.65
~m~
Hydrous sodium silicate (3) 5.06 5.06
10 Bleach 3.44 3.44 3.44
Water --------- -- ---Balance---------
(I) Blend, by weight of total surfactant, of 38.7% ' ydluAy (C
alcohol which has been ~:,hUA~' ' ' with 8 moles of ethylene oxide per
mole of alcohol, 58.1% of pol~u,.~ u~,.yh..~ ,ul~u~ reverse
block polymer and 3.2% .nu.~ cid phosphate.
(2) Polygel DK, 3-V Chemical Corporation
C3) 2.0 ratio SiO2:Na2O Britesil H20.
The invention may be embodied in other specified forms without departing
from the spilit ûr essential . 1 ,.. t . ;`1;~ ` thereof. The present ' ' are
20 therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the
scope of the inventiûn being indicated by the appended claims rather ~an by the
foregoing ri~crnrtinn and all changes which come within the meaning and range
or ~ . v.l~ ..~ of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
-

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2175335 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1999-10-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1999-10-12
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1999-01-04
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 1998-10-26
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1998-10-13
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 1998-04-24
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1996-04-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1996-04-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-05-11

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1998-10-13

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1997-09-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1997-10-14 1997-09-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
EDWARD JOSEPH WANDSTRAT
JOHN MICHAEL JOLICOEUR
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1995-05-10 14 745
Abstract 1995-05-10 1 41
Claims 1995-05-10 2 93
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1998-11-09 1 184
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 1999-01-05 1 171
Fees 1996-04-28 1 49
International preliminary examination report 1996-04-28 10 192
Prosecution correspondence 1996-04-28 2 31
Examiner Requisition 1998-04-28 2 34