Language selection

Search

Patent 2183906 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2183906
(54) English Title: PRODUCTION OF LOW FINE SEDIMENT HIGH TBN PHENATE STEARATE
(54) French Title: PRODUCTION D'UN MELANGE DE PHENATE-STEARATE A FAIBLE TENEUR EN SEDIMENTS FINS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C7C 323/20 (2006.01)
  • C7C 319/20 (2006.01)
  • C10M 159/22 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FRIDIA, CHRISTOPHER S. (United States of America)
  • CAMPBELL, CURT B. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1996-08-22
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-02-24
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/002,716 (United States of America) 1995-08-23

Abstracts

English Abstract


An overbased phenate stearate is produced by overbasing a mixture that
comprises sulfurized phenate, metal stearate (such as calcium stearate), at
least one solvent, calcium hydroxide, and water, by contacting the mixture
with carbon dioxide in the presence of an alkyl polyhydric alcohol, such as
ethylene glycol. The level of agitation is maintained at a level sufficiently
high so that all solids are suspended over the length of the overbasing step.
The polyhydric alcohol to water ratio is maintained sufficiently high so that
the ratio is at least 4:1 at the end of the overbasing step. The overbased
mixture is stripped to produce an overbased phenate stearate having less
than 0.10 vol.% fine sediments.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 9 -
What is claimed is:
1. A process for producing an overbased phenate stearate comprising:
(a) overbasing a mixture that comprises sulfurized phenate, metal
stearate, at least one solvent, calcium hydroxide, and water, by
contacting said mixture with carbon dioxide in the presence of an
alkyl polyhydric alcohol, while maintaining the level of agitation
sufficiently high so that all solids are suspended over the length of
the overbasing step, wherein the alkyl group of the alcohol has
from one to five carbon atoms; and
(b) stripping said overbased mixture to produce an overbased phenate
stearate having less than 0.10 vol.% fine sediments.
2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the alkyl polyhydric alcohol is
ethylene glycol.
3. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the stearate is calcium stearate.
4. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the sulfurized phenate
comprises an overbased sulfurized phenate.
5. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the polyhydric alcohol to water
ratio is maintained sufficiently high so that the ratio is at least 4:1 at the
end of the overbasing step;
6. A process according to Claim 5 wherein the polyhydric alcohol to water
ratio is maintained sufficiently high so that the ratio is at least 9:1 at the
end of the overbasing step.
7. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the overbased phenate stearate
has less than 0.05 vol.% fine sediments.
8. A process for producing an overbased phenate stearate comprising:
(a) overbased a mixture that comprises sulfurized phenate, calcium
stearate, at least one solvent, calcium hydroxide, and water, by
contacting said mixture with carbon dioxide in the presence of an
ethylene glycol,

- 10 -
(1) while maintaining the level of agitation sufficiently high so that
all solids are suspended over the length of the overbasing
step, and
(2) while maintaining the polyhydric alcohol to water ratio
sufficiently high so that the ratio is at least 9:1 at the end of
the overbasing step; and
(b) stripping said overbased mixture to produce an overbased phenate
stearate having less than 0.05 vol.% fine sediments.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ 2 1 839~6
PRODUCTION OF LOW FINE SEDIMENT
HIGH Tl3N PHENATE STEARATE
5 The present invention relates to the production of highly overbased
phenate stearate.
BACKG~OUND OF THE INVENTION
10 The present invention con1es out of work in the production of phenate
stearate having a high Total 13ase Number (TBN). That production is
hampered by the creation of .~ fine sediment. The fine sediment is virtually
os~ le to remove from th~ product by means common to the manufacture
of phenate, such as filtration.
EPO 0,094,814 A2 teach~s improving the stability of an overbased
phenate by treating the phenate with a carboxylic acid having a Cl0 to Cz4
Ul ILI ~1 I.,B ed segment, such as stearic acid.
WO 88/03944 and 88/03~45 teach an overbased phenate having a TBN
of more than 300. This high 1-BN is achieved by using an additional
co",~,,an~"l. either a carboxylic acid, such as stearic acid, or a di- or poly
carboxylic acid having from 36 to 100 carbon atoms, or an anhydride, add
chloride, or ester thereof.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a process that produces an overbased
sulfurized phenate stearate ~vithout producing fine sediments. That process
controls the degr~e of a~itation and the ratio of ethylene glycol to water
durirlg the overbasing process to prevent the fonmation of fine sediments.
In this process, a mixture having a sulfurized phenate, a metal stearate
(such as calcium stearate), ~t least one solvent, calcium hydroxide, and
water is o ~, L,ased by conta~ting the mixture with carbon dioxide in the
presence of an alkyl polyhydric alcohol. Throughout the overbasing step, the
level of agitation is sufficiently high so that all solids are suspended over the
length of the overbasing step. After the overbasirlg step, the overbased

2 1 B39
, ~
-2 -
mixturQ is stripped io produce an overbased phel1ate stearate having less
than 0.10 vol.% fine sediment~3.
Preferably, the polyhydric alcohol to water ratio is " Idil ddil l~d sufficiently
5 high so that the ratio is at least 4:1 at the end of the overbasing step. Morepreferably, the polyhydric alcohol to water ratio is " ,~.;. I~dil ,ed suffidently high
so that the ratio is at least 9:1 at the end of the overbasing step. Preferably,the overbased phenate stearate has less than 0.05 vol.% fine sediments.
10 The alkyl group of the alcohol has from one to five carbon atoms.
Preferably, the alkyl polyhydric alcohol is ethylene glycol.
The sulfurized phenate to be overbased can comprise a partially
o~u.udsed sulfurized phenate.
BRIEF DESCfi.. I I~N OF THE D~AWINGS
In order to assist the " ,d~rald"-Ji"g of this invention, reference will now
be made to the appended drawings. The drawings are exemplary only, and
20 should not be construed as limiting the invention.
Figure 1 shows how fine ~;ediment varies as a function of degree of
agitation and the weight ratio of ethylene glycol to water at the end of the
Cdl L,~nd~iu,, step in the process, in a reactor operating with poor agitation.
Figure 2 shows how the fine sediment varies as a function of the weight
ratio of ethylene glycol to wa~er at the end of the ,dl Lol~aliol1 step in the
process, in a reactor operating with good agitation.
DETAILED Di-~SCh,. I ION OF THE INVENTION
In its broadest aspect, the present i~vention involves a process for
producing an u ~_, I,ased phenate stearate without the production of fine
se.li",~)la. That process comprises overbasing a mixture that comprises
35 sulfurized phenate, metal st~arate, at least one solvent, calcium hydroxide,
and water, by contacting the mixture with carbon dioxide in the presence of
an alkyl polyhydric alcohol, and strlpping the overbased mixture to produce
an overbased phenate stearate having less than 0.10 vol.% fine sediments.
_ .. . . . . _ _ _

1 83906
. ~
- 3 -
In order to achieve less th,3n 0.10 vol.% fine sediments, one must
maintain the level of agitation sufficiently high so that all solids are
suspended over the lengih of the u l~. Ldail ,~ step. Preferably, one should
also Maintain a polyhydric alcohol to water ratio surficiently high so that the
5 ratio is at least 4:1 at the end of the overbasing step.
In order to achieve less than 0.05 vol.% fine sediments, one should
maintain a polyhydric alcohol to water ratio suffficiently high so that the ratio
is at least 9:1 at the end of th~ overbasing step.
The alkyl group of the alk~l polyhydric alcohol should have from one to
five carbon atoms. One such useful alkyl polyhydric alcohol is ethylene
glycol. The stearate can calcium stearate, and the sulfurized phenate can
comprises an sulfurized phenate that has been previously overbased.
FINE SEDIMENTS CONTENT
The fine sediment was dele" "i"ed by following a " lo~iri~dliul l of the
ASTM Test Method D 2273 ( Standard Test Method for Trace Sediment in
20 Lubricating Oils). The modified test method consists of filling a centrifuge
tube to the 75 ml mark with n3ptha and adding sufficient final, stripped and
filtered sample to fill the tube to the 100 ml mark. A stopper is placed in the
tube and it is shaken until th~ filtered sample co",~ ,t~ly dissolves in the
naptha. The tube is then pla~ed in a oentrifuge operating at 4000 RPM's.
25 The sample is spun for 15 minutes at 4,000 RPM and then the volume of the
ce"' iCu~d solids at the bottom of the tube is read. The fine sediment in the
sample is calculated as follows:
Volume % Fine = 4 x (ml of sediment read in centrifuge tube).
Sediment in Sample
During the process to produce the high TBN o;~.Lased phenate stearate,
two factors strongly affect th~ quality of the high TBN overbased phenate
s~earate. These factors are:
(1 ) how well the c3rbon dioxide gas is dispersed into the reaction
medium during t~le overbasing step, and
(2) the ratio of the weight percent of ethylene glycol to water in the
reactor at the end of the overbasing step.

21 83906
.
--4 -
The degree to which the carbon dioxide gas is dispersed, or mixed, into
the reaction depends on the eFfectiveness of the gas-liquid mixing in a
particular reactor. [nyi"ee, i"y analysis of the gas-liquid mixing occuring
during overbasing revealed that one contributing factor to the formation of
5 this fine sediment was localized overoverbasing or inadequate gas-liquid
mixing. During Cdl uu, latiul~, adequate gas-liquid mixing is necessary to
prevent the formation of a fine sediment.
~-GITATION LEVEL
The e~r~uti~ eas of gas-liquid mixing for a specific reactor can be
~,u, t,ssed as an Agitation Scale Level (ASL) value, a term often used in the
industry. Tha ASL value for a given reactor is a function oF reactor diameter,
liquid volume, impeller diame~er, number of impeller blades, impeller blade
15 pitch, impeller blade height, liquid density, liquid viscosity, impeller RPM and
gas flow rate. The ASL scale ranges between 0 and 10 and can be broken
into four groups:
ASL Desuiption
0 Indicates a floaded impeller.
1-2 Provides no, ,n~,u.led impeller con~itions for coarse dispersion
of gas. Typica~:,, ' ' )i are ones in which mass transfer
or gas dispersion is not critical.
3-5 Drives fine bu~bles uulll~ ,~ly to vessel wall and
recirculation of dispersed bubbles back into the impeller.
Gas di~ iu,~ is cul~aid~l~d moderate.
6-10 Provides maximum interfacial area and recirculation of
dispersed bubl~les back into impeller. C~ldld~ ris~ic of gas-
liquid reaction~i where rapid mass transfer is required.
35 We have found that an agitation scale level of 3 would be sufficient to
suspend all solids over the l~ngth of the overbasing step.

-
- 2183906
-5--
POLYHYDRIC ALCOHOL TO WATER RATIO
During the o:~, Ldsi"~ steps of the reaction, polyhydric alcohol, such as
ethylene slycol, is present in the reactor to aid in reactions taking place.
5 Also during the reaction, wateir is produced by the neutralization reactions
between the calcium hydroxid3 and the alkylphenol and stearic acid and also
between the reaction of calcium hydroxide with cdrbon dioxide. In general,
the bulk of this water is removed during the reaction. As the water is
removed from the reactor, it r~moves some of the ethylene glycol from the
10 reactor as well teven though, in theory, the reactor temperature and pressur~is such that ethylene glycol should not be distilling). This removal of the
ethylene glycol is also increased during the overbasing step if inefficient gas-liquid mixing is present. Also, if good vacuum control is not " ,~,;, lldil ,e~
during the reaction (a~u~ ' lly too high a vacuum is " Idil ,la;. ,ed), too muchwater and ethylene glycol can be removed from the reaction which can result
in the formation of this fine sediment. Consequently, it has been found that
their is an optimum ratio of th~3 weight percent ethylene glycol to water that
should be present in the reacl'or at the end of the overbasing step that
prevents the formation of the fine sediment. The weight percent ethylene
20 glycol and water present in the reactor is d~tt:l",i"ed by removing a sample
of the reactor contents and subjecting the sample to an d~t:Ytl u,uic distillation
using Xylene and collecting t~le distillate which ~herl contains the ethylene
glycol and water as a separate phase. The amount of ethylene glycol
present in this separate phas 3 is d~l~l " ,i"ed by refractive index.
EXAMPLES
The invention will be further illustrated by following examples, which set
forth particularly advantageous method ~",~odi",e"~ .. While the Examples
30 are provided to illustrate the l~resent invention, they are not intended to
limit it.
EXAMPLE 1
To a clean 4,0û0 gallon ( 15,151 liters) reactor equipped with a variable
speed agitator, operating to provide a sufficiently high level of agitation so
that all solids are suspended over the length of the overbasing step, were
charged 3,654 pounds (1,657 kilograms) of diluent oil, 7,435 pounds
.. . . .. ... _ .. ~ . .. , . . _ = _ _ _

2 1 83906
--6 -
(3,372 kilograms) of decyl alcohol, 483 pounds ~219 kilograms) of ethylene
glycol, 4,825 pounds (2,188 ~ilograms) of dodecyl phenol, 2,760 pounds
(1,251 kilograms) of calcium hydroxide, and 150 pounds (68 kilograms) of
calciurrl chloride dihydrate with the agitator tumed on at ~,.,u, UAil I ,..t~,ly 75F
5 (24 C). To this mixture was then added 3,100 l~ounds (1,406 kilograms) of
solid stearic acid. The contents of the reactor wers heated to 150 F (65 C).
When the raactor t~""~e, ' ~e reached 150 F i 10 F (65 C i 5 C), an
additional 2,760 pounds (1,251 kilograms) of calcium hydroxide was charged
to the reactor. The reactor pressure was then " ,~ dil ,ed at 4.0 i 0.2 psia
10 (0.28 ~ 0.014 kg/cm2) of vacl~um with the sour gas system.
The reactor was heated to 290 F i 5 F (143 C i 2 C) over 1.5 i 0.25
hours. When the reactor realched 290 F ~ 5F, 803 pounds (364 kilograms)
of liquid sulfur was charged ~o the reactor and allowed to mix for 1û - 2û
15 minutes to ensure complete tl l~,UI ~UUI elLiul~ of the sulfur into the reactor. The
reactor was then heated to 300 F (148 C). When the reactor conlents
reached 300 F i 5 F (148 C i 2 C), 58û pounds (263 kilograms) of
ethylene glycol was added over 1.5 hours while the reactor was heated to
350 Fi 5 F (176 C i 2 C). When the reactor reached 350 Fi 5 F, 1,802
20 pounds (817 kilo5rarns) of carbon dioxide was added at a rate of
9.68 pounds/minute (4.39 hiloy~ a/~ ute) sirnultaneoulsy while adding
1,152 pounds (522 kilogram.~) of ethylene glycol at a rate of
6.4 pounds/minute (2.9 kiloy, ~, lla/~ l lil "~te) over 3 hours. When the carbondioxide and ethylene glycol ~3dditon was complete, 468 pounds
25 (212 kilograms) of carbon di~xide was added at a rate of 3.9 pounds/minute
(1.8 hil~yl~",~ "i"~te) over 2 hours. At the end of the overbasing step, a
1 quart (0.946 liter) sample ~vas removed from the reactor and the water and
ethylene glycol In a 100 gram aliquot of this sample was subjected to
ullu,l~ic distillation to afford 2.6 mls of azeotrope. The ethylene glycol
30 content of this azeotrope was d~ l ",i"ed by refractive index to be 90.0 %, or
2.3 grams of ethylene ylycal. The remaining mass of the azeotrope,
0.30 grams, I~,ult:a~ d the water content of the azeotrope. The ethylene
glycol to water weight ratio, therefore, was 9Ø At the end of this second
carbon dioxide addition, rerr~aining water, produced from the neutralization
35 reactions between alkylpherlol and stearic acidl with calcium hydroxide and
the reaction of calcium hydr~xide with carbon dioxide, and remaining
ethylene glycol was remove~d by vacuum distillation. This was acc~" ,,uali~l ,edby reducing the vacuum in tl,le reactor to 5.9 psia i 1 psia (0.41 i 0.007
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

21 8390S
--7--
kglcm2) gradually over a peric~d of 30 minutes while " Id;l Itdil lil ,g the
temperature at 350 F i 5 F ~176 C i 2 C). Following this removal of the
water and ethylene glycol, the raactor distillation recaiver was changed and
the decyl alcohol solvent, and residual ethylene glycol, was removed from the
reaction by further vacuum distillation. To ~r~ C~ 11 this, the reactor
vacuum was reducad to 0.5 - 1.5 psia (0.035 - 0.11 kg/cm2) gradually over 30
minutes while heating the real,tor temperature to 425 F i 5 F
(218 C i 2 C) . When the reactor reached 425 F i 5 F and 0.5 - 1.5 psia,
it was held for 1.5 hours.
Following this second distillation, the reactor vacuum was broken with
purge nitrogen and the reactar was cooled to 350 Fi 5 F (176 C i 2 C),
and the contents of the reactc~r (18,603 pounds or 8,438 kilograms) was
pumped to a storage tank. F~llowing this, 718 pounds (325 kilograms) of
diluent oil was flushed throug~ the reactor and pump into the storage tank.
The product in the storag~ tank was then filtered through a Schenk filter
with the aid of a filter aid to afford a prduct with the following average
~,u,u~,l;as. TBN = 387, Ca = 14.3 %, S = 2.15 %, C02 = 10.3 %, SlCa = 0.15,
C02/Ca = 0.72, Viscosity = 377 cSt (100 C) and sediment 0.02 Vol. %.
EXANIPLE 2
Referring to Figure 1, a series of runs were made to show how fine
25 sediment varies as a function of degree of agitation and the weight ratio of
ethylene glycol to water (EG/H2O) at the end of the Cdl l,or,dliu,~ step in the
process, in a reactor operatir g with poor agitation (an Agitation Scale Level
of be~ween 1 and 2). Figure 1 shows that as the EG/H20 ratio increases; the
level of fine sediment decreases dldll. - 1l~. For example, at an EG/H20
30 ratio of 4.7, a hne sediment content of 5.9 volume % is observed while at an
EG/H20 ratio of 9.0, an average fine sediment of 0.026 volume % is observed
(average of three different re~ctions showing O.û2, 0.02 and 0.04 volume %
fine sediment).
35 Figure 2 shows how the fine sediment varies as a function of the weight
ratio of ethylene glycol to wa~er (EG/H2O) at the end of the C,dl bUI IdliUn step
in the process, in a reactor operating with good agitation (an Agitation Scale
Level of between 3 and 4). Figure 2 shows that as the EGIH20 ratio
.,

~ J 8~q~
--8 -
increases; the level of fine sediment cle,,, ~:ases but not as ~I dl I IdliWIIy as
when an the reactor is operatin3 at a low ASL level (between 1 and 2 - see
Figure 1). For example, Fig-lre 2 shows that with an EG/H20 ratio oF 4.0, the
flne water.sedime~t content is 0.14 volume % while at an EG/H20 ratio of 7.3,
5 a 0.04 volume % fine sediment is observed.
While the present inventicn has been described with reference to speciflc
bo.li~ ,ts, this ,, ' " , is intended to cover those various changes
and s~ ti~ns that may be made by those skilled in the art without
10 departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2183906 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2004-08-23
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2004-08-23
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2003-11-03
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2003-08-22
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-08-22
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-07-10
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-02-24

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-08-22

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-07-05

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 1996-08-22
Registration of a document 1997-05-22
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1998-08-24 1998-06-25
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1999-08-23 1999-08-04
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2000-08-22 2000-07-28
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2001-08-22 2001-07-05
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2002-08-22 2002-07-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
CHRISTOPHER S. FRIDIA
CURT B. CAMPBELL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1996-11-19 1 16
Abstract 1996-11-19 1 19
Description 1996-11-19 8 365
Drawings 1996-11-19 2 22
Claims 1996-11-19 2 52
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1998-04-22 1 111
Reminder - Request for Examination 2003-04-22 1 113
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-09-21 1 176
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2003-11-02 1 166
Courtesy - Office Letter 1997-04-24 1 72
Courtesy - Office Letter 1996-12-16 1 45