Language selection

Search

Patent 2191970 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2191970
(54) English Title: PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A MOTOR VEHICLE'S BUILT-IN SHOCK ABSORBERS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET DISPOSITIF POUR LA DETERMINATION DES CARACTERISTIQUES DES AMORTISSEURS MONTES SUR UN VEHICULE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G1M 17/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LANGLECHNER, RICHARD (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • RICHARD LANDLECHNER GMBH
  • SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
(71) Applicants :
  • RICHARD LANDLECHNER GMBH (Germany)
  • SNAP-ON INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2004-10-26
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1995-08-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1996-03-14
Examination requested: 1997-09-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1995/003268
(87) International Publication Number: EP1995003268
(85) National Entry: 1996-12-03

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 44 31 794.8 (Germany) 1994-09-06

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process is proposed for determining the characteristics of
a motor vehicle's built-in shock absorbers. The vehicle is driven
onto a ramp support which is then quickly removed, causing the
vehicle to drop onto a base whose distance below the ramp support
corresponds to the residual rebound clearance associated with the
particular vehicle design; the changes in the so-called wheel contact
force when the car hits the base are measured. The process is
characterized by the fact that the vibration characteristics of the body
and one wheel at a time ate measured, the measurement results,
together with the measured values of wheel contact force, are fed into
the known differential equations governing damped oscillations, and
the characteristic data for the vehicle structure, namely, the body- and
heel masses, spring stiffness and damping constants, are calculated.


French Abstract

Procédé pour la détermination des caractéristiques amortisseurs montés sur un véhicule, selon lequel le véhicule est amené sur un support de rampe qui est ensuite retiré rapidement, de telle façon que ledit véhicule tombe sur un appui dont la distance par rapport au support de rampe correspond au débattement résiduel de la roue, prédéterminé par la conception du véhicule, et l'on détermine la force dite force de contact de la roue lorsque le véhicule heurte l'appui. Ledit procédé est caractérisé en ce qu'on mesure les caractéristiques de vibration de la carrosserie et de chacune des roues, en ce qu'on introduit les résultats ainsi obtenus de la mesure, conjointement avec les valeurs mesurées pour la force de contact de la roue, dans les équations différentielles connues pour les vibrations amorties, et en ce qu'on calcule les données caractéristiques pour le châssis d'un véhicule, à savoir, les masses de la carrosserie et des roues, la rigidité des ressorts et les constantes d'amortissement.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
CLAIMS:
1. A process for determining a response to a force of
shock-absorbers installed in a motor vehicle, comprising:
(a) positioning the motor vehicle on a support surface
(b) removing suddenly the support surface so that the motor
vehicle drops a predetermined distance from the support
surface onto a base, said predetermined distance
corresponding to a predetermined residual rebound clearance
defined by the vehicle's design specifications,
(c) measuring wheel contact forces exerted on the base as a
function of time when the wheels hit the base,
(d) measuring at least one of a displacement, a velocity
and an acceleration of the vehicle body and of at least one
wheel as a function of time, and computing using results of
said measuring steps (c) and (d) the characteristic data
values for a motor vehicle's running-gear, including a
vehicle body mass and a wheel and wheel axle mass, and at
least one of a vehicle spring-stiffness, a tire spring
constant, a tire damping constant and a shock absorber
damping constant.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said
measuring step (d) comprises measuring a displacement of the
vehicle body and at least one wheel.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said
displacement is measured by (i) determining individually the
vibration-amplitudes of the body relative to the base and
those of the wheel relative to the base, or (ii) determining
a difference in amplitude between these two vibration-
amplitudes.

15
4. A process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3,
wherein said measuring step (d) comprises measuring a
velocity of the vehicle body and said at least one wheel.
5. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3,
wherein said measuring step (d) comprises measuring an
acceleration of the vehicle body and said at least one wheel
including at least a period of time when the wheel contacts
the base following the step of removing suddenly said
support surface.
6. A device for implementing the process as claimed
in any of claims 1 to 5, comprising:
a ramp and support-surface for the motor vehicle,
said support-surface being arranged removable above a base
at a vertical distance therefrom corresponding approximately
to the motor-vehicle's residual rebound clearance, and
a measuring device for determining the wheel
contact force acting on the base as a function of time after
the motor-vehicle has been dropped onto said base,
wherein a measuring system is provided to measure
at least one of a displacement, a velocity, and an
acceleration of the vehicle body and of at least one wheel
as function of time.
7. A device as claimed in claim 6, characterized in
that the measuring system comprises an inductive pick-up.
8. A device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in
that the measuring system comprises a means for measuring
velocity.

16
9. A device as claimed in any of claims 6 to 8,
characterized in that the measuring system comprises a means
for measuring acceleration.
10. A device as claimed in any of claims 6 to 9,
characterized in that the measuring system comprises a
laser.
11. A device as claimed in any of claims 6 to 10,
characterized in that the measuring system is provided with
an image-recording system.
12. A device as claimed in any of claims 6 to 11
further comprising a computer, wherein measured values of
said wheel contact forces exerted on the base when the
wheels of the motor vehicle hit the base and measured values
of said at least one of a displacement, a velocity, and an
acceleration of the vehicle body and of at least one wheel
are input into the computer, which is programmed to output
values for at least one of a vehicle body mass, a wheel and
wheel axle mass, a vehicle spring-stiffness, a tire spring
constant, a tire damping constant, and a shock absorber
damping constant.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-. Trans~atson from
_ ~, ~~ .. ~ 2191910
~ ~~i.E, tTi iy;~ ~:.~:~.;"-
~Ht'T TRANSi.ATION
process and Dev;cP fnr T1o+ rm;n;nn +hA Uharactersa+;r.~
Of a lHOtOr VehtcTe's Rttilt-in Chnnk-~hcnrhAr~
The invention relates to a process for determining the
characteristics of the shock-absorbers installed in a motor
vehicle. According to this process, the vehicle is run up a
ramp and onto a support surface which is then removed
suddenly so that the vehicle drops onto a base. The
vertical distance between the base and the support surface
corresponds to the residual wheel-rebound-clearance imposed
io by the design of the vehicle concerned. When the vehicle
hits the base, the curve of the wheel-contact force exerted
on the base is determined.
This process is described in EP Patent 2 269 81 [sic].
Using this process to test the condition of the running
gear of a motor vehicle, it is already possible, by
suitable curve-analysis of the results representing the
wheel-force on the base, to produce, among other things,
findings regarding the damping characteristics of the
suspension joints of a motor vehicle, the quality of the
io shock-absorbers, and the hardness of the vehicle's springs.
However, an evaluation of a vehicle's vibration-behaviour
based on the graphs obtained when measuring the wheel-
contact forces on the base provides no absolute
characteristic-data values for the vehicle at the time of
testing, because the effects of tyre-pressure, vehicle-
loading, and the type of tyre fitted cannot be taken into
account.
The aim of the present invention is to develop a process
whereby the characteristics of a shock-absorber fitted to a
3o motor vehicle can be determined without having to detach
the shock-absorber, irrespective of such variables as the
tyre-pressure, type of tyre, vehicle-load, etc. In other

CA 02191970 2001-11-29
30293-1
2
words, the aim of the in~rention is to provide a process
whereby all those forces which, in the known process,
codetermine the vibration-behaviour of the vehicle once it
hits the base, can be el~_minated; and whereby the actual
values for the damping constants and spring-stiffness - i.e.
the current condition of t=he shock-absorber - can be
computed from the measured values.
The invention provides a process for determining a
response to a force of shock-absorbers installed in a motor
vehicle, comprising: (a) positioning the motor vehicle on a
support surface (b) remozring suddenly the support surface so
that the motor vehicle dx-ops a predetermined distance from
the support surface onto a base, said predetermined distance
corresponding to a predetermined residual rebound clearance
defined by the vehicle's design specifications, (c)
measuring wheel contact f=orces exerted on the base as a
function of time when the wheels hit the base, (d) measuring
at least one of a displacement, a velocity and an
acceleration of the vehicle body and of at least one wheel
as a function of time, and computing using results of said
measuring steps (c) and ~.d) the characteristic data values
for a motor vehicle's running-gear, including a vehicle body
mass and a wheel and wheel axle mass, and at least one of a
vehicle spring-stiffness, a tire spring constant, a tire
damping constant and a shock absorber damping constant.
The advantage of the process according to the
invention, compared with the prior-art processes, is that
the result obtained is independent of the tyre-pressure,
type of tyre, or loading of the tested vehicle, and gives
the actual values valid ~~t the time of testing.

CA 02191970 2001-11-29
30293-1
2a
By determining t:he overall vibration-behaviour of
the body and of one wheel. in each case, it is possible to
obtain not only a damping--value, but also the damping-
characteristic of the shc>c:k-absorber, divided into tension
and compression regions. A further advantage of the new
process is that the total testing-time is very short, and
both wheels of a wheel-a~:is can be tested simultaneously
after the shock-producing impact. As well as the
characteristic curve for

3 2191970
the shock-absorber, the stiffness of the vehicle's springs
and the effective masses can also be determined.
The possibility of obtaining all the data needed to
evaluate the condition of the vehicle by means of a single,
brief measuring operation, makes the process suitable for:
- series-testing e.g. by regulatory authorities, and by
the automobile industry (for end-of-production-line
checking and running-gear analysis); and
- workshop diagnosis of faults in motor vehicles already
1o in service,
because the process of the invention enables the vehicle's
actual values to be compared with the required values.
Preferably the vibration-behaviour of the vehicle-body and
of each wheel of the wheel-axis being tested can be
determined by measuring the displacement of the
translational vibrations of the body and wheel, for each
side of the wheel-axis being tested; such displacement-
measurement is performed either by individually determining
the vibration-amplitudes of the body relative to the base
zo and the vibration-amplitudes of the wheel relative to the
base, or by determining the amplitude-difference between
these two vibrations. It may be preferred, however, to
determine the curve of the vibration by measuring the
velocity of the motion of the body and wheel, or by
measuring the acceleration during the motion of the body
and wheel, after they have hit the bases.
An apparatus suitable for performing these measurements
comprises:
not only
so - the measuring device (known in the art) for measuring
the characteristic curve of the wheel contact force on
the base,
- the base, with an up-ramp and removable vehicle support
surface arranged above this base at a height

. 4 2191970
corresponding to the residual rebound clearance of the
vehicle, and
- a measuring device for determining the curve of the
wheel contact force acting on this base after the
vehicle has dropped onto it, as a function of time,
but also
- a further measuring system suitable for determining the
curve of the vibration-behaviour of the body and wheel
as a function of time.
io A measuring system of this type can comprise an inductive
pick-up, a velocity-measuring means, an acceleration-
measuring means, or a [laser]; or it can be equipped with
an image-recording system.
Details of the measurement-process, the design of suitable
devices for its implementation, and the method of
evaluating the measurement-results, will emerge from the
following description of examples of the implementation of
the invention, and from the drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a test stand,
ao With which an image-recording system is being
used;
Fig. 2 is an equivalence-model representing the forces
occurring in a moving motor vehicle;
Fig. 3 is a plot of the vibration frequency of the wheel
contact force, as obtained with the test set-up
shown in Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a plot of the values obtained experimentally
when measuring the vibrational displacement of the
body and wheel, compared with the calculated
3o values (test set-up according to Fig. 1~;

- _ ~ 5 2191870
Fig. 5 is a plot of the characteristic curves obtained
with repeated tests (test set-up according to Fig.
1);
Fig. 6 shows characteristic curves of damping obtained
for a vehicle with shock-absorbers of differing
quality (test set-up according to Fig. 1);
Fig. 7a shows a target to be applied to the wheel of the
motor vehicle;
Fig. 7b shows a target to be applied to the body of the
io motor vehicle; and
Fig. 7c shows a target to be applied to the vehicles
body, enabling the movement of the body in both
the vertical and the horizontal directions to be
determined.
A test stand for implementing the novel testing process
comprises a-ramp 1, with two trapdoor-like drop panels 2a,
2b at the top. The distance between these two drop panels
2a, 2b is approximately the same as that between the two
wheels of a wheel-axis of a motor vehicle. The motor
ao vehicle that is to be tested is driven up an inclined
approach surface 3, so that the two wheels 4 of either its
front or its rear wheel-axis come to rest on the drop
panels 2a, 2b. The upper surface of the drop panels 2a, 2b
is approximately 50 mm above a base 5, which is designed as
a weighing unit 6, e.g. a strain gauge or the like. The
selection of the distance 7 between the drop panels 2a, 2b
and the base is determined by the residual rebound
clearance (i.e. the distance between the wheel axle and a
resilient stop) imposed by the design of the vehicle. This
3o is sa as to prevent the wheel - during its free fall after
the dropping-away of the panels 2a, 2b - from being
arrested by the resilient stops before reaching the base 5,
which would lead to false vibration-results.

6 2191970
The weighing unit 6 serves to measure, as a function of
time, the force on the base 5 resulting from the vibration-
behaviour of 'the vehicle after the wheels 4 have hit the
base 5.
This force will be referred to below as the "wheel contact
force". It constitutes an essential component for the
subsequent numerical determination of the characteristics
of the shock-absorber.
A displacement-measuring system 8a, 8b is provided beside,
io but at some distance from, each of the front wheels 4 of
the motor vehicle resting on the test stand. In Fig. 1, the
displacement-measuring system 8a, 8b is in the form of an
image-recording system, which makes it possible to record
the curve of the vibrations of the body 9 and wheel 4
without coming in contact with them. The curve of the
vibration amplitudes of the body 9 and wheel 4 after
falling through the drop distance 7 forms the second
component necessary for the numerical determination of the
characteristics of the shock-absorber. For this purpose,
2o targets are applied to the wheel and vehicle-body, and the
vibration processes are determined by means of an image-
processing system. The target for the body consists of a
bar pattern, and the target for recording the wheel-
vibrations consists of a rotationally-symmetrical pattern
of alternate black and white rings.
However, when the motor vehicle falls onto the base, body-
vibrations not only occur in the vertical direction, but
also, at the time of impact, small body-vibrations are
detected in the vehicle's longitudinal direction as well.
~o Because the measuring-method used here gives extremely
accurate measurements of vibration-behaviour, these
horizontal vibration movements should also not be ignored.
In order to detect them, however, it has proved
advantageous to modify the target bar pattern known in the

2191970
art, which consists of horizontal black and white bars.
This pattern is altered in such a way that the back-and-
forth movement of the vehicle's body in the vehicle's line
of travel can be determined. This modification of the
target from one used solely for vertical vibrational
movements to the one required here for more accurate
measurements is shown in Fig. 7c. Fig. 7a shows the target
11 consisting of concentric black and white rings, which is
applied to the wheel. Fig. 7b shows a target 12 which is
Zo applied to the body, and is used in cases where only the
vertical vibrations of the body are to be measured. This
target 12 consists of parallel horizontal black and white
bars. Fig. 7c shows a target that makes it possible to
determine the movement of the body not only in the vertical
direction but also in the horizontal direction, i.e. the
direction of travel. The black and white bars, which are
parallel in Fig. 7b, are inclined at an angle to horizontal
in one region of the target shown in Fig. 7c.
The evaluation of the test results will now be described.
ao It should first be mentioned that the computation method
described below is based on a simplified model of a motor
vehicle, shown in Fig. 2. In this model: ml is the mass of
the wheel 4 and wheel axle; m~ is the mass of the body 9,
including any load carried in the vehicle being tested;
the coefficient ci designates the spring constant, which is
given by the tyre-elasticity; and this elasticity
experiences a damping designated by dl.
The body 9 is connected to the wheel 4 by a spring 10 whose
spring constant is cz. The vibration of the spring IO is
io damped by a shock-absorber whose damping constant is dz.
The roadway I2 indicated in Fig. 2 has an uneven surface.
Its maximum unevennesses correspond to the residual rebound
clearance, i.e. the drop distance 7 of the test stand.

8
~ ~ 2191970
The model shown corresponds to a vibrating-system in which
the masses m2 and ml are connected to each other by two
aeries-connected damped springs. The equations of motion of
a two-mass vibrating-system of this type are as follows,
assuming that the spring forces and damping forces are
linear functions of the relative excursion and relative
velocity respectively:
1. mZ ~ pa(t) + d2fY2(t) - Y1(t)1 + c2' YZ(t) - Y1(t)1 = 0
2. mz ~ ya(t) + da~[yi(t) - pi(t)l + cz~[Y1(t) - Ya(t)1 +
io dI~(yi(t) - po(t)1 + cl~(Y1(t) - Yo(t)1 = 0
in which
mi = means the moving masses of the wheel, wheel-axle, and
wheel-suspension;
m2 = is the moving portion of the mass of the vehicle body;
ci = tyre-elasticity;
cz = stiffness of vehicle-spring;
dl = tyre damping; and
dZ = damping constant of a shock-absorber installed in the
vehicle.
ao yo(t) = the translational vibration of the base, as a
function of time;
yo(t) = the velocity of the base, as a function of time;
y1(t) = the translational vibration of the wheel, as a
function of time;
yl(t) = the wheel velocity, as a function of time;
yl(t) = the wheel acceleration, as a function of time;
yz(t) = the translational vibrations of the body, as a
function of time;
y~(t) = the velocity of the body, as a function of time;
3o and

2191970
y2(t) = the acceleration of the body, as a function of
time.
The two equations of motion can be combined into a
differential equation, by introducing the difference
between motion of the wheel and that of the body, in place
of the vibration-amplitudes thereof, thus obtaining:
3. mi~XZ(t) + d2 ~ A ~ x(t) + cz~A~ x(t) = f(t)
where:
a) x(t) = ya(t) - yl(t), with x(t), yi, and yl(t) being
io measured values, namely the curves of displacement of
the body and the wheel over time (the displacement-
difference being computed:);
m
b) A = 1 + m are measured values for the wheel and body
2
c) f(t) _ _dl ml~IY°(t) - Y1(t)7 - cl 'fY°(t) - Y1(t)7 is
likewise a measured quantity, namely the curve of the
wheel contact forces (dynamic wheel load) over time.
The Fourier spectrum of the wheel contact force over
frequency is known in the art. It is plotted aqain in Fig.
3.
2o In the chart, the frequency is shown on the horizontal
axis, with a logarithmic scale running from 10-1 to 10-3 Hz.
The wheel contact force is shown as f(t) on the vertical
scale, which runs from 10° to 10~. At approximately 1.25
Hz, a first maximum occurs, corresponding to the vibration
of the body. At approximately 9.8 Hz, the second maximum
occurs, corresponding to the wheel frequency.
Before the above-described method of determining the
individual parameters was decided on, testing was performed
to determine whether the idealized model on which the
3a method is based was in fact applicable, because e.g.

. l0 2191970
vibrations are also set up in the untested wheel-axis when
the vehicle is dropped onto the base.
Therefore the test vehicles were first equipped with a
total of 8 measuring sensors, which were attached to the
body- and wheel-axes at intervals.
The results showed, however, that scarcely any rotational
movements occur around the longitudinal axis of the
vehicle, and therefore little vibration energy is
transmitted from one side of the vehicle to the other.
io Also, the untested wheel-axis has little effect on the
tested wheel-axis; little vibration energy is transmitted
to the latter.
Accordingly it appears possible to consider the left and
right sides of the vehicle separately from each other in
the region of the tested wheel-axis, and without regard to
the wheel-axis that is not being tested. In other words,
the above-described equivalence-model of a two-mass
vibrating system can be applied without fear of falsifying
the results.
ao Using the measuring system shown in Fig. 1, it is therefore
possible to measure the curve of the wheel contact forces
f(t) over time by means of the weighing device 6, and to
determine x(t) by means of the displacement-measuring
system 8a and 8b. Suitable programming of a computer to
which the iarqe number of measurement signals from the
weighing unit 6 and the displacement-measuring system 8a,
8b Were fed, enabled the desired model parameters m, d, and
c to be computed according to the least-squares method of
estimating true values from measured values subject to
3o error.
In Fig. 4, the computed and measured values are plotted
against time in seconds, using the inductive measuring

a
11
2191970
method for the difference in displacements. It can be seen
clearly that the two curves match each other well.
This shows that the chosen computation-method is suitable.
After the model parameters m, c, and d have been
determined, however, the effective values for the wheel
mass mi, body mass mz, spring-stiffness cz, and damping
constants dz can now be determined, because the static
part of the wheel contact force fst provides a relation
between these values: fst = ml + mz + g, where g is the
1o acceleration due to gravity = 9.8065 m/[sz]. The following
relations of the chosen model-parameters (m, c, and d) to
ml, mz, dz, and cz also apply:
mi = m
mz = fst/g - ml
dz = d ' mz ' g/fst
cz = c ' mz ' g/fst
The above concepts and relations make it possible to
produce a symmetrical (tension: compression = l:lj linear
damping characteristic with reference to the wheel contact
zo point for a shock-absorber installed in a motor vehicle. In
practice, however, the shock-absorbers used generally have
an asymmetrical characteristic curve.
Here, the required result will be obtained either by having
a regional linear equation-arrangement for the damping
force, or by having a quadratic arrangement with linear and
quadratic terms of different magnitudes in the tension and
compression regions.
Fiq. 5 shows the test results from five tests on a Mercedes
motor vehicle. As can be seen from the plots in Fig. 5,
3o there were scarcely any differences between the individual
results. The computed values for the parameters show
deviations from the measured values of between 1 and 2Ys.

~
1z 2191910
The test set-up for these last-mentioned measurements
corresponded to that of Fig. 1. An inductive measuring
system was used.
The measuring method used was: the determination of the
difference i.n displacements. The measured values from the
displacement-measurement system and the weighing unit were
fed into a computer, whose software was programmed
according to the mathematical vibration equations.
The same test set-up can also be used for determining the
io individual amplitudes of the body and wheels by means of
the displacement-measurement system; but this in no way
changes the principle of the computing method.
It is however also possible, and in certain cases
advantageous, to compute the desired values by using a
measuring system in which the velocity-differences between
the body and the wheel-masses are determined, instead of by
determining the difference in displacements. Similarly, a
measuring method can also be chosen in which the
accleration-differences between said measured quantities
ao are determined. Apparatuses suitable for this purpose are
known to persons skilled in the art, and therefore the test
set-up for these measuring methods need not be explained in
detail here.
Fig. 6 illustrates the efficacy of the method according to
the invention.
This graph shows the characteristic curves of damping for
different test series performed on the same test vehicle.
For determining these characteristic curves, the test
vehicle was first tested without modification. Then the new
3n right rear shock-absorber was replaced by a 40~ shock-
absorber and the vehicle was tested again.

13 2191970
Consideration of the damping curves shows that the residual
damper performance values are of different magnitudes in
the tension and compression regions. Whereas the residual
damper performance in the compression region is
approximately 13%, it is 53% in the compression region.
By performing such an evaluation, it may be possible to
determine the type of damage to the shock-absorber on the
basis of the change in the characteristic curve.
From what has been said above, it can clearly be seen that
io the shock-absorber testing method according to the
invention sets new standards for evaluating the
characteristic curves representing the condition of a motor
vehicle.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2007-08-17
Letter Sent 2006-08-17
Grant by Issuance 2004-10-26
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-10-25
Letter Sent 2004-08-25
Inactive: Single transfer 2004-07-13
Inactive: Final fee received 2004-06-09
Pre-grant 2004-06-09
Letter Sent 2004-01-30
4 2004-01-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-01-30
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-01-06
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-11-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-08-05
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-11-29
Letter Sent 2001-10-05
Extension of Time for Taking Action Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-10-05
Extension of Time for Taking Action Request Received 2001-08-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2001-05-29
Letter Sent 2000-08-29
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2000-08-15
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1999-08-17
Letter Sent 1998-02-17
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-01-05
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1998-01-05
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-01-05
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 1997-12-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1997-10-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-09-17
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1997-09-17
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-06-19
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1996-03-14

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1999-08-17

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-08-03

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
RICHARD LANDLECHNER GMBH
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED
Past Owners on Record
RICHARD LANGLECHNER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-06-10 1 10
Claims 2003-11-16 3 103
Representative drawing 2004-01-05 1 10
Abstract 1996-03-13 1 17
Claims 2001-11-28 3 105
Description 2001-11-28 14 501
Description 1996-03-13 13 482
Claims 1996-03-13 3 99
Drawings 1996-03-13 7 122
Description 2004-10-24 14 501
Abstract 2004-10-24 1 17
Drawings 2004-10-24 7 122
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-01-04 1 173
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-02-16 1 118
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1999-09-13 1 187
Notice of Reinstatement 2000-08-28 1 170
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-01-29 1 161
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-08-24 1 128
Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-10-11 1 173
Fees 1997-08-06 1 38
PCT 1996-12-02 36 915
Correspondence 1997-01-13 1 38
Correspondence 2001-08-22 1 44
Correspondence 2001-10-04 1 15
Fees 2000-08-14 2 67
Correspondence 2004-06-08 1 31