Language selection

Search

Patent 2195283 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2195283
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING IRON DEXTRAN USING ULTRAFILTRATION
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION DE FER-DEXTRAN PAR ULTRAFILTRATION
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08B 37/02 (2006.01)
  • B01D 61/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • USHER, THOMAS C. (Canada)
  • PATEL, NATU (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THOMAS C. USHER
  • NATU PATEL
(71) Applicants :
  • THOMAS C. USHER (Canada)
  • NATU PATEL (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-07-22
(22) Filed Date: 1997-01-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1998-07-16
Examination requested: 2001-10-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A process for manufacturing Iron Dextran comprising, forming a direct complex of dextran with ferric chloride, and using an ultrafiltration membrane having a molecular weight cut off between 5,000 to 50,000 to purify the product.


French Abstract

Procédé permettant de fabriquer du dextrane de fer, consistant à former un complexe direct de dextrane avec du chlorure ferrique, et à utiliser une membrane d'ultrafiltration de masse moléculaire se situant entre 5 000 et 50 000 pour purifier le produit.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for manufacturing Iron Dextran comprising,
forming a direct complex of dextran with ferric chloride,
and using an ultrafiltration membrane to purify the product.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the ultrafiltration
membrane has a molecular weight cutoff between 5,000 to
50,000.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the Fe content of the
product is between 5 to 20%.
4. The process of claim 2 wherein the Fe content of the
product is between 5 to 20%.
5. An Iron Dextran product made by the process of claim 1,
2, 3 or 4 which is substantially free of impurities.
-7-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2195283
90030-23 RDF:bw
PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING IRON DEXTRAN
USING ULTRAFILTRATION
It is well known that the so called "IRON DEXTRAN"
preparation has been developed and utilized as a satisfactory
product for therapeutic use, as intramuscular injection in
animals and intravenous injection in humans for correcting
iron deficiencies.
A wide variety of preparations have been utilised for the
above purpose. Most preparations of iron dextran are made,
using degraded dextran complex with ferric hydroxide and
purified alcohol, e.g. isopropyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol,
methyl alcohol etc.
The raw dextran is obtained according to known methods by
growing organisms, especially leuconostoc mesenteroldes, under
carefully controlled conditions in a suitable nutrient medium
with high concentration of sugar. Crude dextran is partially
hydrolysed by dilute mineral acid. Fractions of different
average molecular weight can be precipitated with organic
liquid such as isopropyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, ethyl
alcohol. This degraded product consists of polymerized
glucose in which the anhydroglucose units are linked
predominantly by oo-1:6 and to a lesser extent by o0-1:4
linkage.
- 1 -

CA 02195283 2004-12-13
The dextrans used for most Iron Dextran preparations have
molecular weight less than 10,000. After fractionation,
dextran is converted to heptonic acid with an alkali metal such
as cyanide, or hydrogenated with sodium borohydride as
described in US Patent No. 3,234,209.
Further, experience with manufacturing Iron Dextran
complex using the above method has indicated loss of dextran
and Iron Dextran during precipitation with alcohol and
consequent loss of stability of final product. Again due to
purification with alcohol. The product from this standard
method has pronounced variation such as pH, Dextran content,
colour and chemical variation from batch to batch.
We have now discovered a process for manufacturing Iron
Dextran, using dextran produced with a known process, which by
a direct complex with ferric chloride and, with modified
purification method, produces a stable complex with minimum
variation from batch to batch.
Purification is done using tightly controlled molecular
weight ultrafiltration membranes instead of alcohol
precipitation. Ultrafiltration membranes remove all other
impurities e.g. chloride, heavy metal, free acid etc. without
loss of dextran or Iron Dextran. Using such ultrafiltration
membranes also reduces free ferric ions and free ferrous ions
in the final product. This increases the stability, reduces
- 2 -

CA 02195283 2004-12-13
the toxicity, and increase the yield of Iron Dextran.
In addition to the above advantages, the new process,
reduces the chances of explosion or environmental risk due to
lack of alcohol in the process.
Accordingly, we have discovered a process for
manufacturing Iron Dextran comprising, forming a direct complex
of dextran with ferric chloride, and using an ultrafiltration
membrane to purify the product. The ultrafiltration membrane
may have a molecular weight cut off between 5,000-50,000. The
Fe content of the final product may be between 5-20%. The
invention extends to Iron Dextran made by the novel processes
described herein which is substantially free of impurities.
Example: 1
A solution of ferric chloride having Fe content of 8.0% is
added into a plastic tank.
Separately a 20.0% solution of sodium carbonate is made,
and with agitation added to the ferric chloride solution, until
the pH of the solution is 1.6.
A solution of dextran having a concentration of about
16.0% is added to the above mixture in a ratio of 1:1.4
(Fe:Dextran), continuously adding the solution of sodium
carbonate until the pH of the mixture is 5.5.
- 3 -

2195283
Transfer the resulting solution into a glass lined
reactor and heat at 80 C until the concentration of Fe in the
solution is 4.0%. Cool and purify with ult raf ilt rat ion
membrane, having the Molecular Weight cutoff 5,000-50,000.
Purification is continued until the Fe concentration is
raised to 10.0%, and other impurities are removed, pH:of
solution adJusted to 6.5, adding required amount of phenol as
preservative. The solution is then filtered and stabilized by
heating the solution at 105 C for 3 hours.
Example: 2
A solution of ferric chloride having Fe content of 8.0%
is added into a plastic tank.
Separately a 20.0% of sodium carbonate is made, and with
agitation added to the ferric chloride solution, unt i l the pH
of the solution is 1.6.
A solution of dextran having a concentration of about
16.0% is added to the above mixture in a ratio of 1:4
(Fe : Dext ran ), with continuous adding of the so lut ion of sodium
carbonate until the pH of the mixture is 6Ø
Transfer the resulting solution into a glass lined
reactor and heat at 80 C until the concentration of Fe in the
- 4 -

2195283
solution is 4.0%. Cool and purify with ultrafiltration
membrane (Molecular Weight cutoff 5,000-50,000).
Purif icat ion is continued unt i 1 the Fe concent rat ion is
raised to 5.0%, and other impurities are removed. The pH of
the solution is adJusted to 6.5, adding the required amount of
phenol. The solution is filtered and stabilized by heating
the solution at 105 C for 3 hours.
Example: 3
A solution of ferric chloride having Fe content of 8.0%
is added into a plastic tank.
Separately 20.0% solution of sodium carbonate is made,
and with agitation added to the ferric chloride solution,
until the pH of the solution is 1.6.
A solution of dextran having a concentration of about
16.0% is added to the above mixture in a ratio of 1:1.1
( Fe : Dext ran ), with cont inuous adding of the solut ion of sodium
carbonate until the pH of the mixture is 5.5.
Transfer the resulting solution into a glass lined
reactor and heat at 80 C until the concentration of Fe in the
solution is 4.0%. cool and purify with ult raf ilt rat ion
membrane.
- 5 -

2195283
Purification is continued until the Fe concentration is
raised to 20.0%, and other impurities are removed. The pH of
the solution is adJusted to 6.5, adding the required amount of
phenol as preservative. The solution is filtered and
stabilized by heating solution at 105 C for 3 hours.
The aforesaid examples are for i llust rat ive purposes and
do not limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the
art will appreciate modifications which may be made to the
aforedescribed processes which fall within the scope of the
invention.
- 6 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2195283 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2015-01-16
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2014-04-15
Letter Sent 2014-01-16
Maintenance Request Received 2013-01-16
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-10-06
Inactive: Acknowledgment of s.8 Act correction 2008-10-01
Inactive: S.8 Act correction requested 2008-08-07
Grant by Issuance 2008-07-22
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-07-21
Pre-grant 2008-04-14
Inactive: Final fee received 2008-04-14
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-10-29
Letter Sent 2007-10-29
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-10-29
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-10-21
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2007-09-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2007-04-17
Inactive: Office letter 2007-01-12
Inactive: Corrective payment - s.78.6 Act 2007-01-03
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-11-29
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-11-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-09-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-03-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-01-26
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-07-26
Letter Sent 2005-04-25
Reinstatement Request Received 2005-04-13
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-04-13
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-04-13
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 2005-03-23
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2004-12-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-12-13
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-06-16
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-06-16
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2001-12-10
Letter Sent 2001-12-10
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2001-12-10
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-10-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-10-11
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-10-01
Inactive: Entity size changed 1999-07-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1998-07-16

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-04-13

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-12-06

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1999-01-18 1999-01-13
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2000-01-17 1999-11-22
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2001-01-16 2000-11-29
Request for examination - standard 2001-10-11
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2002-01-16 2002-01-14
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2003-01-16 2002-11-13
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2004-01-16 2004-01-09
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2005-01-17 2004-11-19
Reinstatement 2005-04-13
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2006-01-16 2005-12-14
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2007-01-16 2006-10-19
2007-01-03
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - standard 11 2008-01-16 2007-12-06
Final fee - standard 2008-04-14
2008-08-07
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2009-01-16 2009-01-02
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2010-01-18 2010-01-08
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2011-01-17 2011-01-11
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard 2012-01-16 2011-11-18
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard 2013-01-16 2013-01-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THOMAS C. USHER
NATU PATEL
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1998-08-19 1 24
Abstract 1997-05-01 1 8
Cover Page 1997-05-01 1 14
Claims 1997-05-01 1 17
Description 1997-05-01 6 165
Cover Page 1999-09-30 1 24
Claims 2004-12-13 1 18
Description 2004-12-13 6 164
Cover Page 2008-06-26 1 23
Cover Page 2008-10-01 2 52
Claims 2008-10-01 1 21
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1998-09-17 1 115
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-09-18 1 129
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-12-10 1 179
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2005-02-24 1 166
Notice of Reinstatement 2005-04-25 1 171
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2007-10-29 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2014-02-27 1 170
Maintenance Fee Notice 2014-02-27 1 170
Fees 2002-01-14 1 40
Fees 2002-11-13 1 39
Fees 1999-07-19 1 41
Correspondence 2007-01-12 1 15
Fees 2007-12-06 1 35
Correspondence 2008-04-14 1 38
Correspondence 2008-08-07 3 70
Fees 2009-01-02 1 34
Fees 2013-01-16 1 72
Correspondence 2014-05-23 2 269