Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
',.
1
IN-SERVICE MONITORING IN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS
The present invention relates to means for monitoring communications
networks, in particular arrangements for detecting faults affecting traffic
signal
paths.
It is desirable in most, if not all, communication networks, that there
should be some form of in-service monitoring, so that failure of a part of the
network is detected promptly and can be dealt with. There are many ways in
which a failure may be detected and some form of indicator is normally
required.
Usually, if a piece of equipment fails, it emits an alarm. The alarm may
indicate what kind of failure has occurred.
Downstream of the failed equipment, in a signal path, further pieces of
equipment may detect that a failure has occurred upstream, for instance
because
of signal loss. These downstream pieces of equipment might also then each
issue
an alarm. To prevent misleading generation of multiple alarms from downstream
equipment suffering signal loss or perturbation, it is known for the first
piece of
equipment downstream from a fault to emit instead an Alarm Indication Signal
fAIS). This is not itself an alarm but indicates that an alarm has been
generated.
It then prevents all the following equipment in the signal path from
generating their
own alarms. Without the AIS, a fault might otherwise be difficult to locate
and
diagnose.
Digital communications systems used by network operators have an
established practice in which a loss of signal detected by a piece of
equipment
downstream from a fault in a path causes the equipment to send an AIS. This is
normally in the form of a continuous stream of digital "1 "s. The AIS could be
in
any other form defined and recognised by the network in question, but digital
"1 "s
have been found particularly appropriate.
The AIS must be detectable and generally AIS detection criteria are set at
a threshold of a given number of continuous digital "1 "s, or a given density
of "1 "s
over a certain span of bits. The AIS may be set at a relatively high level so
that
detection is not assumed after only a short string of "1 "s. Because network
performance is important to both customer and network operator, both the time
and the number of incidents for which an AIS is triggered may be recorded.
AMENDED SHEET
2196685
. , ..
.. .. .,
°'''~ 2
Communication paths are available at various bit rates or rates of data
transmission to suit the customer's requirements. At the high data rates there
is
sometimes a deterministic frame structure. A deterministic frame structure is
one
in which a source sends a signal with a well defined structure at the binary
level in
the form of overhead plus payload. At lower data rates, such as at 64Kbit/sec,
there tends to be no generic deterministic frame structure.
'Structured' services usually take the form of a standardised path
overhead (such as a periodic framing pattern perhaps with a CRC-type function
which can be used for monitoring purposes) and a well defined payload area for
the, usually non-deterministic, customer traffic signal. An example of a
structured
signal is the G.704/G.706 ITU recommended frame structure for the 2048kbit/s
network layer path signal. In this example the path overhead is defined in
Timeslot
0 (which contains, amongst other functions, both a frame alignment signal and
a
CRC), and the payload the customer can use is, in most cases, the remaining 31
Timeslots of the frame in some format (thus giving the customer a maximum
aggregate 1984kbit/s payload channel).
Many network operators offer services which take the form of giving the
customer the whole bit rate of the digital path in question. For example, this
could
be a nx64kbit/s path (where n = 1,2,3 ...to some limit perhaps) or a higher
bit rate
hierarchical network layer, such a 2048kbit/s or 34368kbit/s path. This
creates a
problem for the network operator offering such a service because there is no
generic frame structure requirement imposed on the signal at the binary level
(either by the customer or the network operator) which can be used by the
network operator to monitor the end-to-end performance of the path at the
binary
level. In this specification such service offerings will be referred to as
' unstructured' .
A particular problem with unstructured services is thus that the network
operator might not be quickly (if at all) aware of path failures. In some
cases this
information is first provided by the customer.
In public telecommunications networks systems where quality of service
and continuity of service are specified to very high levels, if not
guaranteed, an
extra path can be provided for back-up purposes. This extra path will
generally
take a different route from the primary path to assist in providing the level
of
AMENDED SHEE'~
. .
~~~sss~
3
service being supplied to the customer. In a standard service, however, only
one
traffic carrying path will be provided on an end to end basis because the
provision
of an additional end to end path would significantly increase cost .
For reasons of economy, it is therefore desirable that capacity for
monitoring a standard service be derived purely from the path which carries
the
traffic. For instance, as mentioned above, it is known to use an Alarm
Indication
Signal (AIS), which is commonly a signal comprising all "1 "s. This particular
all
"1 "s AIS is widely used (and defined in the international standards bodies
such as
the ITU) because for one reason it is easily implemented in practice in a wide
range
of terminal equipment.
However, there is a problem in that an AIS cannot be used in the traffic
path without restricting the form of traffic carried in some way so that it
does not
inadvertently mimc an AIS.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a
communications system for transmitting communications signals on a
communications path, the communications path comprising one or more elements
capable of outputting an alarm indication signal for transmission on the path
in
response to a fault condition arising,
wherein a scrambler is provided for scrambling communications signals input to
the
path for transmission thereon, and a descrambler is provided, to descramble
the
transmitted, scrambled communications signals, said one or more elements lying
between the scrambler and the descrambler,
and where an alarm indication signal detector is provided between the
scrambler
and the descrambler for detecting alarm indication signals carried by the
path.
The alarm indication signal may, for instance, comprise a series of
repeated bits, such as all "1 "s, in a digital communications system.
Embodiments of the present invention can then provide communication
paths dedicated to the use of a specific customer wherein the customer's
signal is
scrambled at the input to the communications path and unscrambled before being
received by the customer's equipment at the end of the path. This allows the
customer ostensibly to use an all " 1 "s signal for his own purposes, such a
signal in
practice being scrambled while carried by the path and therefore not
detectable as
an AIS by the AIS detector at the receiving end of the path.
~n,l~a.IDED ~"r~~~~
~~~~~685
°~.- 4
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a
method of monitoring a communications path for faults occurring which affect
traffic on the path, including the steps of scrambling traffic signals to be
transmitted on the path, transmitting said scrambled traffic signals along the
path,
monitoring the path for an AIS, and unscrambling the traffic signals by means
of
an unscrambling device.
Embodiments of the invention can detect in particular an AIS occurring on
the path between a point where the traffic signals are scrambled and where
they
are unscrambled.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a
network terminating unit (NTU) for use with a communications path in a
network,
at least one element of the path having means to output an AIS on the path in
the
event of a fault occurring upstream with respect to it in the path, wherein
the NTU
has means for inputting a traffic signal to the path for transmission thereby,
scrambler means for scrambling the traffic signal prior to transmission on the
path,
descrambling means for descrambling traffic signals received from the path,
and
AIS detecting means for detecting an AIS being transmitted on the path, the
AIS
detecting means being arranged in the NTU to receive the scrambled traffic
signals
from the path, or an AIS in the event that an AIS is transmitted on the path.
Thus, using two NTUs as described above, in an embodiment of this
invention, a customer's data may be scrambled as it transits a first NTU
(Network
Terminating Unit), at a first end of the path, and descrambled as it transits
a
second NTU at a second end of the path. Each NTU may be used to connect
individual customer terminals, for instance data terminals, to a
telecommunications
network.
Many of the paths currently operating at any network level, for example n
x 64kbit/sec, 2048kbit/sec, 8448 kbit/sec and 34368kbit/sec and provided as a
standard service, do not have a deterministic frame structure comprising
payload
and overhead. Embodiments of this invention could be used to provide
performance monitoring functions for these paths.
The following is a discussion of network failures which might be detected
by triggering an AIS.
p~MENDED SHEEN
219~~~5
.,
.. ,.
There are generally two types of network failure: a first is the 'hard'
failure, where a true loss of a signal (at some network layer) occurs and for
which
AIS will persist in all downstream client layers until either automatic or
manual
restoration is effected; and a second is the 'soft' failure, where a transient
but
5 gross disturbance of a network layer signal occurs and that network layer
loses
path alignment. In such a case both the affected network path layer and all
client
path layers go through a complex loss and recovery of frame alignment until
normal operation is resumed. The key point to note here is that the network
self-
recovers without any form of intervention.
The first type of failure is rather obvious and its implications are easily
understood. The second type of failure is, however, more interesting and its
implications need to be clearly understood to optimise the solution.
The soft failure is usually a consequence of short but intense error bursts
in networks (for example, as small as 10 ~s at 140Mbit/s). A key facet of this
effect, is that each client layer loses and recovers frame alignment due to
corruption of the justification process, which either inserts an extra bit or
deletes a
traffic bit from the client layer signal. This effect is known as an
'uncontrolled bit-
. .
slip'.
Examining the effect of an uncontrolled bit-slip as it ripples through the
successive client network layers shows a complex pattern of random error
events
(with a bit error density probability, pe = 0.5) intertwined with very short
bursts
of AIS. The AIS occurs due to the detection of loss of frame alignment at a
given
layer and persists until such time as the layer in question recovers frame
alignment.
It is generally accepted by the man skilled in the art of error performance
that the above described soft failure phenomenon can be interpreted as giving
rise
to a (SES) - both at the network layer of origin and in all supported client
network
layers. In the case of a hard failure, AIS is usually a permanent state (until
manual
or automatic restoration is effected) and hence SES events are easily
measured.
One of the most important parameters to measure from the perspective of
both the network operator and the customer is Unavailability. The customer and
network operator might also have contractual performance agreements on
'Service
AMENDED SHEET
219 fi685
6
Availability', such that it is highly desirable that such a measurement can be
performed accurately in-service.
A path is usually defined to enter the Unavailable state (from the Available
state) at the onset of a period of several consecutive Severely Errored
Seconds
(SES). Within the ITU Recommendations on error performance, namely 6.821 and
6.826, this is currently defined to be 10 consecutive SES. Exit of the
Unavailable
state (to the Available state) is usually defined at the onset of a period of
several
consecutive non-SES. Within the aforementioned ITU Recommendations this is
currently defined to be 10 consecutive non-SES.
A further parameter which has been found important to measure is 'Short-
Breaks' (SB). A SB is defined in this patent as a number of consecutive SES
which
terminate before the threshold which defines the onset of Unavailability. A SB
event terminates on the first non-SES. For example, and in consideration of
the
above discussion, a SB could be defined as a period of between say 3 and 9
consecutive SES. Moreover, such events could be measured as a single class, or
they could be sub-divided into several class intervals, with the frequency of
SB
events in each class interval measured.
If the availability and error performance is to be recorded, a method of
measuring it needs to be devised. Since the key measurements are
Unavailability
and Short Breaks, and since both are based upon the SES, this measure could be
the occurrence of the SES. That is, from the above it is clear that the SES
(also
defined in the above named ITU Recommendations) is the key primary parameter
to measure.
Performance information can either be reported immediately to a network
management centre as it occurs, or stored at the NTU where it is measured and
then reported once say, every 24 hours, either in response to a polled request
or
by means of a known autodialling system. Whether immediate or deferred
reporting is required will depend upon the nature of the impairment and the
maintenance philosophy of the network operator. For example, it could be
decided
that all unavailability events are always immediately reported (and perhaps
stored),
whilst occasional SES events are generally stored and only reported in
response to
polling from a network management system.
~,.~,~cp,InF~ ~~~~'
7
In order to implement embodiments of the present invention, there might
be provided a network terminating unit (NTU), for use in a communications
path,
having means for receiving an incoming digital traffic signal, scrambler means
for
scrambling the traffic signal, and transmission means for transmitting the
scrambled signal along a path. A second NTU might then be provided at the far
end of the path, to receive the scrambled signal. The second NTU will then be
provided with a descrambler.
The size of any scrambler/descrambler used will affect network
performance. If there is a disturbance at some point then the greater the
number
of stages in the scrambler the greater the time taken for the disturbance to
filter
through the descrambler and the greater the time to settle back to normal
operation after the disturbance. There are therefore distinct advantages in
using a
scrambler with a small number of stages. Using a scrambler with a relatively
simple generator polynomial, such as G(x) x4+x+1, the scrambler can be
implemented in practice in only four stages. This particular function, G(x),
is an
example of a primitive polynomial.
Using a scrambler with a small number of stages does lead to the risk that
incoming data for a particular state of the scrambler could generate a
sequence of
digital "1 "s of greater length than the threshold length n which is set to
detect an
AIS. In such circumstances the detection of the AIS would be false. In order
to
overcome this and prevent such an event occurring it is proposed to
incorporate an
Adverse State Detector which can be used to move the scrambler to a different
state. The Adverse State Detection system checks the scrambled traffic signal
transmitted into the network by the first NTU. If a persistent stream of
digital
"1 "s is detected then the adverse state detector invokes a change of state of
the
scrambler.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to the
attached drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows a general configuration of a single network connection
with facilities for in-service performance monitoring,
Figure 2 shows an example of a self-synchronous scrambler/descrambler
with an example of a type of adverse state detection mechanism, and
' "'-LADED SHEET
~i~sss~
8
Figure 3 is a table showing an example of adverse state detection on a
scrambler/descrambler.
Figure 1 shows a simple network in which the signal flow is described
from left to right. (Similar considerations apply to signals flowing in the
reverse
direction). A piece of Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) 1 is connected via a
path 2 to a first NTU 3. The NTU 3 provides connection to an allocated path of
a
serving network 6, over which signals can be carried to a second NTU 8 and
delivered to different CPE 12 over path 1 1.
In this arrangement, an AIS might be generated by a number of different
types of fault affecting the path in the serving network 6. An AIS can usually
be
generated by any equipment in a network in response to an immediately upstream
fault. This includes for instance multiplexers or elements of line systems
such as
regenerators or repeaters. An AIS arising in the allocated path of the serving
network 6 will be carried to the second NTU 8 and it is there that it needs to
be
distinguishable from ordinary traffic carried by the serving network to that
NTU 8.
In order to make customer traffic signals distinguishable from an AIS
sourced from in the serving network 6, the customer traffic signals are
scrambled
at the transmitting NTU 3 before being input to the path 5. On arrival at the
second NTU 8, everything carried by the path 5 of the serving network 6 goes
to
an AIS detector and measurement unit 9 in the second NTU 8. The detector and
measurement unit 9 detects the incoming signals and if an AIS, for instance a
continuous sequence of digital "1 "s, is detected for longer than a
predetermined
period, an AIS is deemed to have been detected. Additionally, any one second
time period which has an AIS condition present in it is deemed to be an SES.
The second NTU 8 is also provided with a descrambler 10. If no AIS is
detected (i.e. for instance if there is not a continuous sequence of "1 "s
which
exceed a preset threshold n) then the signal is passed to the descrambler 10
where
it is descrambled before passing out of the second NTU 8, along the connection
1 1
to the second CPE 12. A similar process occurs for the signals transmitted in
the
other direction, i.e. from right to left in the Figure.
The two NTUs 3, 8 may be interchangeable, both having a scrambler and
a descrambler in their transmitting and receiving sections respectively.
nnnFrlDED SHEET
_ z~~ss~~ :.
9
This embodiment enables a customer to use the full bandwidth of the path
with a performance monitoring function being provided but without the extra
expense of providing additional bandwidth for the performance monitoring.
Reporting performance data and/or specific events to the Network
Management System (NMS) 14 may be, for example, by a dial-up PSTN link (public
switched telephone network), by dial up ISDN (Integrated Services Digital
Network)
or by X25. Once the reports have been received by the NMS 14 then appropriate
action can be taken.
On unstructured digital paths 5,6,7 the customer can generate any binary
sequence of ' 1 s' and 'Os' usually without restriction. Hence, if the
customer
signal can be prevented from generating a sequence of greater than say n
consecutive binary ' 1 s' into the serving network 6 (i.e. from transmitting
NTU 31,
and n is chosen optimally in respect of the foregoing discussion, then if a
sequence
of greater than n consecutive binary all ' 1 s' is detected at the receiving
NTU 8 this
can be attributed as sourced from within the serving network infrastructure 6
(i.e.
a true AIS signal) and can be associated with a SES event occurring.
The probability of the scrambler generating a consecutive sequence of
binary ' 1 s' is a function of both the input customer signal sequence and the
state
of the scrambler at any point in time. This probability can, perhaps, be made
arbitrarily small by using a scrambler (and descrambler) with many stages.
However, as indicated above, a large number of stages in the (self-
synchronising)
scrambler/descrambler equates with a proportionately increased delay in
regaining
scrambler/ descrambler synchronisation (say due to error events) and there
could
be increased cost implications. Moreover, the probability of the scrambler not
generating a sequence of greater than say n binary ' 1 s' cannot be reduced to
zero
in any case.
One method of ensuring that the scrambler cannot generate a consecutive
sequence of greater than n binary ' 1 s' is to use an adverse state detector
mechanism within the design of the scrambler 4. This mechanism checks the
binary sequence sent into the network 5, 6, 7 from the NTU 3, and if it
detects a
persistent stream of all ' 1 s' the mechanism invokes a change of state of the
scrambler 4. A similar system can be used at the descrambler 10 to correct for
AMENDED SNE~ ~--
1.
.",
~~~ssg~ ; .
.. .. ..
this aberration (though this can be omitted on cost grounds if required - the
implications of doing this are covered later).
Figure 2 is an example of a suitable scrambler. This scrambler operates a
small number of stages. This is possible because a simple generator polynomial
5 has been used. It is of the form Glx) = x4 + x + 1. This simple polynomial
can be
implemented in just four stages. The small number of stages is advantageous in
ensuring the descrambler regains synchronisation in a short period - 4 clock
periods
for the example given - after the disturbing event ends.
The example adverse state detector shown consists of an AND gate 20,
10 which logically summates the outputs from the three delay stages x, x2 and
x3 of
the scrambler/descrambler. The AND gate is assumed to be at logic state 1 when
all three delay stages are at logic state 1. A summation device E counts the
number of clock cycles that the outputs of the three delay stages stay at
logic
state 1. An exclusive OR gate, shown between delay stages x3 and x4, has the
function of inverting the value of the delay stage x4. So if during operation
of the
scrambler all four delay stages are set at 1, and the customer data input
signal is
also 1, then the output signal to the network will also be 1. This prevails
for so
long as the customer signal remains at 1. The summation device will then count
the 'number of clock cycles that delay stages x, x2 and x3 remain at 1. Whilst
this
remains below a preset threshold the output logic state of the summation
device
remains at 0. Once the threshold is reached the summation device output is set
to
logic state 1 which, on the next clock cycle, sets the value in delay stage x4
to 0.
The action of reaching threshold causes the summation device to reset its
count
and output stages. With complimentary adverse state mechanisms at both
scrambler and descrambler, the aberration is corrected at the descrambler. An
example of this scrambler and the particular sequence of operation is given in
Figure 3.
At cycle n+4 it can be seen than the scrambler/ descrambler delay stages
are all set to '0'. If, at this point, the customer data became a persistent
sequence
of consecutive 'Os' then the NTU output to the network would also become a
sequence of 'Os' for as long as the customer sequence of consecutive 'Os'
persisted. This certainly does not present a problem for the invention as
claimed,
nor should it be a problem for the network, assuming that all network
transmission
ni~:IFi~~~!'~ ,-'',~~~vi
2196~~~
11
systems encountered have been designed to cope with this, i.e. there are no
spectral or timing issues.
Although not proved here, it can easily be shown that whatever initial
state the scrambler and the descrambler are in (e.g. both different), they
both
become synchronised (i.e. have the same state) under error-free conditions
after a
maximum of 4 clock cycles in the example given - or more generally, after a
number of clock cycles equal to the number of delay stages in the
scrambler/descrambler. This is indeed how the self-synchronous
scrambler/descrambler recovers after any period of gross disturbance, such as
a
large error burst or a break in transmission.
It should be noted that any single transmission error gets multiplied by the
number of feedback taps of the descrambler. In most cases this will be 3 as in
the
example given above. Hence, one could argue that G(x) should also be a
primitive
polynomial of the least number of terms. However, since most error events are
bursty in nature this point is perhaps academic, and the simple 'multiply by
the
number of feedback taps' rule no longer holds. Indeed, a precise analysis
requires
an exact knowledge of both the error burst characteristic and the state of all
elements in the system.
It is possible to remove the adverse state detection mechanism at the
descrambler (it must remain at the scrambler). With the example type of
adverse
state detector shown in Figure 2 (i.e. inversion of the last delay stage
onlyl, this
leads to only a single binary error at the descrambler for each operation of
the
adverse state detector at the scrambling end. The removal of the adverse state
detector at the descrambler will be examined again later from a consideration
of
the need for transparent transmission of AIS to the customer.
The bounds on the adverse state detector threshold and its relationship
with AIS are considered below. Before any bounds can be determined for each
network layer it is important to understand how AIS manifests itself in
networks,
which in turn requires an understanding of how the scrambler/descrambler will
behave under such network aberrations and what the effects are on the original
signal. In turn, this requires a consideration of the parameters associated
with AIS
events since this is the key to determining what performance measurements are
possible.
~.~,~ENDED SHEET
»_
2l~ssg~
. ..- _ .
12
The way in which AIS manifests itself has already been discussed
previously, where it was noted that 'soft failures' can result from error
events in
server network layers, and that an uncontrolled bit-slip can propagate through
the
client network layers.
The implications of an uncontrolled bit-slip for an unstructured signal with
bit rates at or above the primary network layer of the Plesiochronous Digital
Hierarchy (PDH) is that the descrambler will be affected by the extra or
deleted bit
in a similar fashion to an error event. That is, the descrambler will need to
recover
synchronisation and the time taken will be proportionate to the number of
stages in
the descrambler - for the example scrambler/descrambler embodiment given this
could be up to 4 clock cycles. In practice, since the uncontrolled bit-slip
will
invariably be accompanied by surrounding error activity this effect is not
that
significant. The key point to note however, is that a self-synchronising
scrambler/descrambler will 'process out' the uncontrolled bit-slip and recover
synchronous operation.
Experimental work has shown that a 2048kbit/s primary rate path signal
structured in accordance with ITU Recommendation 6.704 and 6.706 will recover
framing and normal operation about 1 to 2ms immediately after the point at
which
the disturbance which caused loss of framing is removed. It is understood that
a
longer reframe period (say 3 to 6ms) might apply to the 1544kbit/s primary
rate
path signal structured in accordance with ITU Recommendation 6.704. Since the
nx64kbit/s network layer is usually synchronous with any serving primary rate
network layer, a corresponding period of disturbance will also exist in the
nx64kbit/s path signal.
Events of the above type give rise to an effective bit error probability of
0.5 over the period of disturbance, and since they are troublesome to certain
customers it is important that they can be measured. Moreover, it is
interesting to
note that a bit error probability of 0.5 over about 2ms represents a BER (Bit
Error
Ratio) of about 10-3 over 1-second. From a 6.821 or 6.826 perspective, such an
event can be considered to be a SES. Moreover, it is generally accepted by
experts in the field of error performance that a loss of framing event at any
network layer can be considered to constitute a SES event at that layer and
all
supported client layers.
AMENDED SHEEP
2196685 ~..
13
When a structured network layer path signal loses frame alignment (or
experiences a loss of signal) it generates an AIS downstream as described
previously. Since the adverse state detector in the NTU prevents the scrambler
from generating a consecutive sequence of more than n (say) binary ' 1 s',
then a
sequence of greater than n binary ' 1 s' detected at the receiving NTU can be
deduced to originate from within the network and hence can be associated with
a
SES event. The next step, therefore, is to determine a method for setting the
value of n at the various network layers at which unstructured services might
be
offered by network operators.
A scrambler of m stages cannot generate a consecutive sequence of ' 1 s'
greater than 2m-' -1 when running through its maximal cycle for a constant
input of
"0"s or " 1 "s. If, in the example embodiment of an adverse state mechanism
given, the summation device threshold is greater than 2m~' -1, but less than a
larger
value n say, then any sequence of greater than n binary all ' 1 s' can be
associated
with an AIS (and hence SES) event from within the serving network
infrastructure.
For the example embodiment of the scrambler shown (i.e. 4 stages) this
means that the threshold of the adverse state detector mechanism should be set
greater than 7. Hence, suppose the adverse state detector threshold was set at
10, then any sequence of greater than 10 consecutive binary ' 1 s' detected at
the
receiving NTU would be considered to be an AIS (and hence SES) event from
within the serving network infrastructure.
The above can, of course, be generalised to other embodiments of
scrambler and adverse state detection mechanism as required. However, it is
worth noting that bursts of AIS associated with loss of framing at network
layers
above the primary rate can be quite small, and so a scrambler device should be
chosen which does not generate long sequences of ' 1 s' during its maximal
cycle,
when the input is a continuous sequence of "1 "s or "0"s.
In order to make the system flexible so that it can cope with the various
path layers at which unstructured services could be offered in different
network
hierarchies, the value of the threshold at which the adverse state detector
operates
and the threshold at which an AIS (and hence SES) event is detected at the
receiving NTU should both be made independently programmable. The
independently programmable range for each threshold type could be different.
AMENDED SHEET
219668
14
From these considerations the definition of a detection criterion for a SES
at a receiving NTU which could be used at various network layers could be as
follows:
A SES is deemed to have occurred on an unstructured path when n or
more consecutive binary 1 s are detected in any 1-second period, where n is
programmable over the range 10 to 100 (say) in unit steps.
Correspondingly, the threshold at which the adverse state detection
mechanism operates at the scrambler 4 and the descrambler 10 could be defined
as follows:
The adverse state detection mechanism of the scrambler operates when a
consecutive sequence of R binary ' 1 s' is detected going into the network
from the
transmitting NTU, where R is programmable over the range 2'"~' to n (say);
where
m is the number of stages in the scrambler and n is the independently
programmable threshold set for the detection of a SES event at the receiving
NTU.
The adverse state detection mechanism of the descrambler operates when
a consecutive sequence of R binary ' 1 s' is detected coming into the
receiving NTU
from the network. R is programmable over the range 2m-' to n (say). Where m is
the number of stages in the descrambler and n is the independently
programmable
threshold set for the detection of a SES event at the receiving NTU.
The adverse state detection threshold set in the transmitting NTU
scrambler and in the receiving NTU descrambler should be the same.
A mechanism has been described which resides before the descrambler in
the receiving NTU 8 and whose function is to detect SES and AIS. In one
example
embodiment given previously, if a period of true AIS is input to the
descrambler,
and the descrambler has an adverse state detection mechanism as shown in
Figure
2, then the descrambler will, with period 2m-', insert a '0' into the output
signal
transmitted towards the second receiving end of the path 11 to the CPE 12,
i.e.
there will be a sequence of 2m-' -1 consecutive ' 1 s'followed by a '0', and
this
pattern will repeat as long as the AIS persists into the descrambler.
This might or might not be a problem. However, if the customer expects
to see the AIS on network failures some method of allowing the AIS to be
output
to the customer will be required.
'i~~;~~J~!~~ ~i:L~1
~~19~~8
There are several ways this could be achieved, and some examples are as
follows:
i) Removal of the adverse state detection mechanism at the descrambler
5 altogether.
ii) The detection of AIS at the input to the descrambler disables the adverse
state detection for the duration of the AIS. Noting that this could allow one
or two
operations of the adverse state detector (i.e. insertion of 'Os' into the
customer
signal output with period 2m-' ) before it is disabled.
10 iii) Detection of AIS at the input to the descrambler causes a 'bypass'
function, of both the descrambler and its adverse state detection mechanism,
whereby the customer output signal is forced to the all ' 1 s' state for the
duration
of the AIS.
15 The obvious merit of the first option is its simplicity and potential cost
saving in the equipment and its operation - though in practice this might be
trivial.
The merit of the other two options is retention of the adverse state detector
for
correction of customer generated sequences of all ' 1 s'.
A further point which should be noted here is the relative frequency of
network-sourced error events compared to the frequency of operation of the
adverse state detector at the scrambler. Consider the case where an adverse
state
detection mechanism was not implemented at the descrambler (noting that it
must
be retained at the scrambler). It has been noted previously that, for the
example
embodiment given, this results in a single error at the descrambler output for
each
operation of the scrambler adverse state detector. However, it should also be
noted that errors can occur at the output from the descrambler due to error
events
sourced from within the serving network infrastructure 6 in normal operation.
If
the frequency of errors arising in the serving network is significantly
greater than
those which would arise due to operation of the adverse detection mechanism at
the scrambler, then perhaps this could be a valid argument for removing the
adverse state detection mechanism at the descrambler.
The above invention has been described with respect to all network layers
which do not have a deterministic frame structure and it will be readily
apparent to
AMENDED SHEET
2196~g~
16
the person skilled in the art that the implementation of the embodiment is
merely
given by way of example and that the scrambler/descrambler could have a
different number of stages, and the precise nature of the AIS could also be
changed.
a~IIENDED SHEE'~
