Language selection

Search

Patent 2197721 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2197721
(54) English Title: JET NOISE SILENCER
(54) French Title: SILENCIEUX ATTENUANT LE BRUIT PRODUIT PAR UN JET
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


A device is invented to attenuate excessive noise generated by a free jet during high
pressure fluid (a gas or a vapor) release. The silencer consists of a chamber surrounded by
perforated walls, and filled with a granular packing which creates large contact surface with the
fluid flowing through the chamber. The high pressure energy of fluid is effectively dissipated by
the friction between the fluid and the surface of solid packing. The fluid, before it enters the
chamber, is swirled by motionless vanes in the silencer swirler. The swirling distributes uniformly
the fluid through the granular packing in the chamber. The fluid flow rate can be controlled by the
valve installed upstream of the swirler. The flow rate during first period of blowdown can be kept
constant in spite of the pressure drop of evacuated fluid. This option of the controlled fluid rate
would allow for small size of the silencer without increasing time required for full discharge of the
fluid, so the silencer is amenable to portable application.
The jet noise silencer can find application in the installations operating with high
pressure, e.g., power plants, chemical plants, pipelines systems, cryogenic facilities, compressor
stations, etc.


French Abstract

Dispositif visant à atténuer les bruits excessifs produits par un jet libre lors du dégagement d'un fluide (gaz ou vapeur) haute pression. Le silencieux se compose d'une chambre entourée de parois perforées et remplie d'un garnissage granulaire qui crée une importante surface de contact avec le fluide s'y écoulant. L'énergie du fluide haute pression est dispersée efficacement à cause de la friction entre le fluide et la surface du garnissage plein. Le fluide, avant d'entrer dans la chambre, est agité par des aubes fixes dans le diffuseur du silencieux. Le tourbillonnement permet de répartir uniformément le fluide dans le garnissage granulaire de la chambre. Le débit peut être commandé par le robinet installé en amont du déflecteur. Pendant la première période de purge, le débit peut être maintenu constant malgré la baisse de pression du fluide évacué. La possibilité d'obtenir un débit contrôlé pourrait permettre l'utilisation de silencieux de petite taille sans devoir augmenter la durée de vidange complète du fluide, de sorte que le silencieux est portatif. Le silencieux de bruit de jet peut servir dans des installations fonctionnant à haute pression, p. ex., les centrales, usines chimiques, systèmes de pipelines, installations cryogéniques, stations de compression, etc.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. The silencer consists of a valve with the controlled and programmed opening, a stationary
swirler to swirl a fluid jet, a silencer chamber through which the fluid jet is discharged and the
exit shroud.
49

2. The silencer, in which a fluid flow rate through the silencer chamber can be programmed and
appropriately adjusted during the entire period of fluid discharge.
3. The silencer, which is portable.
4. The silencer chamber is characterized by:
(a) The chamber inlet and outlet walls, which are both made of the perforated
material containing plurality of perforations with the same opening size
between 3 and 10 mm
(b) The chamber inlet and outlet walls which are concentric.
c) The chamber inlet and outlet walls which are of identical geometry and they both
assume any of the geometrical shapes listed below, (i-viii), or the chamber inlet and
outlet walls which are of different shapes, representing any combination of the listed
below shapes, (i-viii):
(i) partial sphere
(ii) cylinder
(iii) cone or frustum of cone
(iv) pyramid or frustum of pyramid
(v) polyhedron
(vi) paraboloid
(vii) cube
(viii) rectangular
d) A volume between the inlet and outlet walls of the silencer chamber, which is tightly
packed with granular material characterized by:
(i) the uniform or different sizes of granules
(ii) the size of uniform granules or the minimum size of non-uniform granules is
larger than the perforation openings
5. A swirler of the silencer is located upstream of the silencer chamber, at the chamber inlet.
The swirler comprises the stationary vanes to swirl the fluid and ensure uniform fluid distribution
in the silencer chamber inlet.

6. A valve of the silencer is used in the mode of controlled flow operation. The valve is equipped
with an automatic control system which is characterized by:
a) The program which controls the valve opening appropriately to adjust the flow rate of
fluid entering the swirler in such a way that during the entire period of fluid discharge
the generated noise does not exceed the required level.
b) The control system is programmed to reduce the flow rate at the beginning of the
discharge to prevent generation of the maximum attainable noise level, and to increase
low rate in the last phase of the discharge, when generated noise is below the required
level. This mode of flow rate control results in maintaining almost constant noise level
during the entire fluid discharge.
7. The shroud of the silencer can be a cylindrical or a reversed frustum of cone shape.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2 1 9772 ~
JET NOISE SILENCER
Abstract of the Invention
A device is invented to attenuate excessive noise generated by a free jet during high
pressure fluid (a gas or a vapor) release. The silencer consists of a chamber surrounded by
10 pelrurdled walls, and filled with a granular packing which creates large contact surface with the
fluid flowing through the chamber. The high pressure energy of fluid is effectively dissipated by
the friction between the fluid and the surface of solid packing. The fluid, before it enters the
chamber, is swirled by motionless vanes in the silencer swirler. The swirling distributes uniformly
the fluid through the granular packing in the chamber. The fluid flow rate can be controlled by the
15 valve installed upstream of the swirler. The flow rate during first period of blowdown can be kept
constant in spite of the pressure drop of evacuated fluid. This option of the controlled fluid rate
would allow for small size of the silencer without increasing time required for full discharge of the
fluid, so the silencer is amenable to portable application.
The jet noise silencer can find application in the installations operating with high
20 pressure, e.g., power plants, chemical plants, pipelines systems, cryogenic facilities, compressor
stations, etc.
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to attenuation of high level noise generated by a jet of a high
25 pressure gas or vapor, referred to later as a "fluid", released into the atmosphere.
Background of the Invention
Many industrial processes require release of large volume of fluid at high pressure into
the atmosphere. The fluid is released from safety or relief valves installed e.g., in power plants,
30 chemical plants, cryogenic facilities, compressor stations, gas metering stations, etc. Fluid

2 1 q772 1
pressures can reach e.g. 15 MPa and the noise generated by the jet can approach an A-weighted
sound level of 150 dB. The severe noise of the jet is recognized as a form of pollution which is
the subject to regulations, especially in populated areas. Devices are needed to obtain the jet
noise at acceptable levels. However, most of commercially available silencers are very large and
5 expensive.
The invented silencer is simple to manufacture, effective and has small dimensions. Its
operation is based on the concept of attenuating the noise of fluid jet at the source, which is
mostly the high jet velocity resulting from conversion of the fluid high pressure energy. This
conversion process progresses in the silencer as fluid flows through the silencer chamber filled
10 with the granular packing material. Due to large friction between fluid and surface of packing
material, fluid flow is throttled and the pressure energy is fluently ~1issiratin9~ preventing from
development of high fluid velocities. A spacious volume of uniform packing in the silencer
chamber has no macro geometrical discontinuities, what eliminates occurrence of vibrations or
oscillations which might contribute to noise generation. Small size of the solid packing material is
15 pertinent to noise generation at high frequencies, which is less harmful and easier to attenuate.
Summary of the Invention
The invented silencer attenuates the excessive noise generated by a free jet during high
release of pressure fluid. The silencer can be used for a range of pressures, exceeding 5 MPa,
20 and for fluid rate releases, which may exceed 100 kg/s.
Attenuation of jet noise occurs as the fluid flows through the silencer chamber made of
the inlet and outlet perforated walls and filled with tightly packed granular material. The
geometric configuration of the chamber is such that the total cross section area of perforation
openings at the chamber outlet is appropriately larger than the total cross section area of
25 perforation openings at the chamber inlet. This condition can be fulfilled for different shapes of
the chamber inlet and outlet walls. These walls should be concentric, and they can have either
identical geometrical shapes such as the frustum of cones, cone, cube, pyramid, or they can be
any combination of the said shapes, e. 9. inlet wall is a cone and outlet wall is a frustum of cone

- 219772l
with different inclination angle. The ultimate design of the chamber shape depends on the
properties of the released jet, effectiveness and fabrication cost.
A granular filling of the silencer chamber creates a large surface of contact with the fluid
flowing through the chamber. As the fluid propagates through the chamber, its high pressure
S energy is effectively dissipated due to the friction between the fluid and the large solid surface of
packing. In order to avoid excessive motion of filling particles caused by fluid flow, which can
damage the particles, compact packing is required.
Before the fluid enters the chamber, it is swirled by motionless vanes of the silencer
swirler located in the stack upstream of the chamber, close to the chamber inlet. Swirling helps
10 to distribute the fluid entering the inner wall of silencer in uniform way and, consequently,
through the packing space in the chamber.
The silencer can operate in two optional modes: with the non-controlled fluid flow rate
during relatively small releases or with the controlled flow rate through the silencer. The fluid flow
rate can be controlled with the valve installed downstream of the swirler. The opening of the
15 valve can be controlled (programmed) to maintain the following flow rate schedule: during the
controlled flow rate release, fluid flow rate is reduced and kept constant in the first period of the
release, in spite of the pressure drop of evacuated fluid. This maintained constant flow rate,
which is below the maximum flow rate attainable with the initial high pressure level in the
evacuated fluid, prevents the excessive jet noise generation during the first phase of the
20 discharge. As the pressure in the evacuated fluid decreases, valve opening can be gradually
increased to compensate for the initial reduced flow rate. As a result, the total evacuation time is
not extended, and the maximum noise level generated in the very first period of evacuation is
avoided. This strategy of the controlled flow rate allows for small size of the silencer. As the size
and weight of the silencer is small, it can be easily transported, e.g., as a mobile silencer unit.
2~ The fluid leaving the silencer flows into the shroud of cylindrical or divergent cone shape.
The shroud is used to further reduce the noise and direct vertically the expanded jet into
atmosphere.
The silencer has simple construction and is easy to fabricate.

21 ~7~ l
D~eailed Description
Further details of the invented silencer are given in the following, non-limiting example.
The invention is described with reference to the acco",pan~;ng Figure 1, which is a half side
5 view and a half side view of a section of a silencer, according to the invention.
Referring to Figure 1, the silencer must contain a chamber which is formed by the
perforated frustum of outer (outlet) cone 1 and perforated frustum of inner (inlet) cone 2, and the
non-perforated annular plate 3. Packing contained within the chamber consists of plurality of
separate pieces, tightly packed, made of the erosion, stress and thermal resistive solid material.
I0 The frustum of cones 1 and 2 are fastened to plate 3 with flanges 4 and 5. The conical shroud 6
is fastened to plate 3 with flange 7. The plate 3 is also used as a flange to connect the chamber
~, with diffuser 8, which reduces the flow velocity of the fluid. The diffuser 8 contains swirling vanes
9. The swirling results in uniform distribution of fluid within the hemispherical solid angle at the
diffuser outlet. A cylindrical connector 10, with flange 11, connects diffuser 8 with the blowdown
15 valve 12. The valve controls the flow rate of fluid through the chamber. Noise sensor could be
used to control the valve opening; the valve opens more as noise level decreases. As an
alternative to the noise sensor, other sensors could be used, e.g., a pressure sensor; which
increases valve opening in the second phase of evacuation, when pressure in evacuated fluid
decreases. The silencer described above is mounted on the vertical stack used, for discharge of
20 fluid.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2007-02-19
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2007-02-19
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2006-11-20
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2006-04-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-02-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-10-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-09-22
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-08-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-03-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-11-23
Inactive: Correction to amendment 2004-11-18
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-10-25
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-04-26
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-04-26
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2004-04-07
Letter Sent 2002-03-04
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2002-03-04
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2002-03-04
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2002-02-08
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-02-08
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-10-05
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1998-08-17
Inactive: Applicant deleted 1997-08-22
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-08-22
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-08-22
Inactive: Applicant deleted 1997-08-22
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-08-22

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2006-02-17

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-02-14

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 1999-02-17 1998-02-11
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2000-02-17 2000-02-16
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2001-02-19 2001-02-02
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2002-02-18 2002-02-08
Request for examination - small 2002-02-08
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2003-02-17 2003-02-13
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2004-02-17 2004-02-16
2004-06-07 2004-04-21
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2005-02-17 2005-02-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
RYSZARD PETELA
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1998-08-30 1 6
Abstract 1997-02-16 1 25
Claims 1997-02-16 3 53
Description 1997-02-16 4 159
Drawings 1997-02-16 1 15
Abstract 2004-11-22 1 28
Description 2004-11-22 5 157
Claims 2004-11-22 3 43
Drawings 2004-11-22 2 19
Abstract 2005-08-22 1 29
Description 2005-08-22 8 269
Claims 2005-08-22 3 71
Drawings 2005-08-22 2 16
Drawings 2005-09-21 2 22
Description 2005-09-21 8 311
Abstract 2005-09-21 1 33
Claims 2005-09-21 3 82
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 1999-11-17 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2000-11-19 1 121
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-10-17 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2001-11-19 1 121
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2002-03-03 1 180
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2002-11-18 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2003-11-17 1 114
Notice of Insufficient fee payment (English) 2004-04-06 1 92
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2004-11-17 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2005-11-20 1 118
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2006-04-17 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2006-06-20 1 166
Second Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2006-08-20 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2006-11-19 1 120
Correspondence 1997-03-17 1 18
Fees 2003-02-12 1 25
Fees 2000-02-15 1 28
Fees 2002-02-07 1 41
Fees 1998-02-10 1 32
Fees 1999-02-11 1 32
Fees 2001-02-01 1 28
Fees 2004-02-15 3 68
Fees 2004-04-20 1 21
Fees 2005-02-13 1 31