Language selection

Search

Patent 2200010 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2200010
(54) English Title: PROCESS MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
(54) French Title: INFRASTRUCTURE DE GESTION DE PROCESSUS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04L 41/0233 (2022.01)
  • G06F 9/46 (2006.01)
  • G06F 9/48 (2006.01)
  • H04L 41/5003 (2022.01)
  • H04L 41/5067 (2022.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WACLAWIK, RICHARD (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
  • CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION (Canada)
  • CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION (Canada)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1997-03-14
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1998-09-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process management infrastructure for use in a system for monitoring network
performance comprising process tags for uniquely identify each instance of a process in
the system.


French Abstract

Infrastructure de gestion de processus à utiliser dans un système de surveillance du comportement d'un réseau comprenant des étiquettes de processus pour identifier de manière unique chaque exemplaire d'un processus du système.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPRTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process management infrastructure for use in an object-oriented programmingenvironment comprising process tags for uniquely identify each instance of a process in
the system.
2. A process management infrastructure as claimed in claim 1, further comprising an
interprocess communication component for sending messages to various processes in
order to control the operation of the system, said processes being identified by the process
tag associated therewith.
3. A process management infrastructure comprising two said interprocess
communication components, one for reading messages and the other for writing them.
4. A process management infrastructure as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
which is implemented in a service level management system for data networks.
5. A method of managing processes in an object-oriented programming environment,wherein process tags are used to uniquely identify each instance of a process in the
system.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein messages to various processes in order
to control the operation of the system, said processes being identified by the process tag
associated therewith.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


02200 0 10
Process Management Infrastructure
This invention relates to a process management infrastructure system for use in an
object-oriented progr~mmin~ environment, and in particular for use in a system for
monitoring the compliance with service level agreements in a telecommunications
network,.
There is a need for a system to manage service level agreements (SLAs) between
telecommunications service providers and their business customers. Part of the
management process that relates to SLAs is the comparison of the service providers'
performance vis-à-vis specific guarantees that it may provide to its customer. In packet
switched networks, unlike circuit switched networks, customers are not given a dedicated
circuit; their data is statistically multiplexed with data from other sources. Each customer
pays for a particular level of service, and it is therefore important to ensure that the
customer is receiving the level of service he has paid for. Our co-pending application of
even date describes a system for monitoring network performance relative to customer
service agreements.
The availability requirements for the system is very high. Downtime must be minimi7ecl
at all costs. The system collects time based information from various network
management systems and operation support systems. While the system is down, critical
information can be lost. Various strategies are used within the system to minimi7c the
possibility of losing information. One such strategy is to minimi7e down time.
The system indicates to various parts of the service provider's org~ni7~tion the level of
service they are providing to their customers. Individuals in customer support, sales,
network operations and senior executives rely on this information to make decisions.
The system is also expected to evolve to a point where the service provider's customers
will have access to the system. System downtime can negatively impact the customer's
perception of the quality of the service provider's operation.
To meet the above requirements, it is important that during system failures, the system
automatically attempt to recover. Failing this, the system should notify system operators
of the failure. The system should also have minim~l downtime during deployment of new
system functionality.

~ 0 2 2 0 0 o 1 0
An object of the invention is to provide a process management infrastructure which is
conducive to providing high availability of such a system.
According to the present invention there is provided a process management infrastructure
for use in an object-oriented progr~mming environment comprising process tags for
uniquely identify each instance of a process in the system.
The basic concept underpinning this infrastructure is thus the concept of a ptag or process
tag.
The invention is particularly applicable to a system for monitoring the compliance with
service level agreements in a telecommunications network, but has also application in
other environments.
The invention also provides a method of m:~n~gin~ processes in an object-oriented
progr~mmin~ environment, wherein process tags are used to uniquely identify eachinstance of a process in the system.
The invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example only, withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which the single figure is a block diagram of
a process management infrastructure in accordance with the invention.
Referring to the Figure, the process management infrastructure is composed of the
following components, which are implemented in software: a resolve command interface
( rci ) 1; a deamon process 2 named director; a simple inter process communication
component 3; a process configuration component 4; and a software logging component 5.
The system command interface 1 is the main user command interface to the processmanagement infrastructure. From this interface, a system operator can issue commands to:
start the system. These comm~n~l~ could be:
~ shutdown the system
~ get status on the processes currently running
~ start a specific process
~ stop a specific process
~ tell a process to reread its configuration
- 2 -

~ 0 2 2 0 0 o 1 0
~ tell a process to change its logging level
The main purpose of the director daemon 2 is to startup the system, restart processes that
get termin~te-l and shutdown the system. On startup, director 2 reads in the master process
file which contains the names of the processes that are to be started and monitored by
director.
The master process table has the format:
PTag Executable Narne Start Up Indicator Process Priority Process Args
The format of the configuration file which will specify the processes to start is outlined in
the following table.
Field Description
PTag Process Tag. It is used to uniquely identify each instance of a process
in the system. The PTag is to be used as the name of the config file
(with the extension .cfg) and as the name of the FIFO (with the
extension . fifo)
Executable name The name of the executable without path. The path for executables is
in a variable in the system setup config f1le (systemSetup.cfg).
Start Up Indicator This f1eld indicates whether a process is to be started up by director.
This field contains either a Y or a N. When resolve command
program starts up director, director reads its process table and will
start up all processes that have a Y in this f1eld. If resolve command
program gives director a startup all command, director starts up all
processes which contain a Y in this field. If director gets a specif1c
request to start up a process which contains an N in this field, then it
will start up the process, however it will not restart the process if the
process should exit with a restart code.
Process Priority The nice priority level of the process.
Process The argument string for the process.
arguments Note: director will put the PTag for the process into the argument

f~ 02200 010
string for the process with a -PTag flag. All processes may get the
PTag from the config file class which will parse the comm~n~l line
for process variables.
The inter process communication component 3 is a simple mechanism used to send
messages to various processes in order to control the operation of the system. This
component is implemented using the UNIX FIFO mech~ni~m. The address of a specific
process is determined by the ptag associated with that process. Two components are
provided, one to read messages and one to write them.
A message has the following components:
~ source process - the ptag of the process that is sending the message
~ destination process - the ptag of the process that is receiving the message
~ message id - an integer value which indicates what the message content is to
the receiver
~ response requested - an integer value which indicates whether the process is
expecting a reply to the message
~ size - and integer value which indicates the size of the body
~ body.- the body of the message for the process
The process configuration component is a set of object oriented classes which are
imbedded into each resolve process for the purpose of m~n~ginp configuration parameters
associated with that process. The process configuration component uses the ptag
associated with the process to deterrnine which configuration file should be read.
The software logging component 5 is a set of object oriented classes which are imbedded
into each resolve process for the purpose of providing a status and error logging facility.
The software logging component 5 uses the ptag associated with the process to determine
which file the log data should be written to.
~ specific example will now be described.
In a first scenario, process B2 dies. The following events occur to restart process B2.

~ 0 2 2 0 0 o 1 0
~ the director is notified of the process death via Unix signals.
~ the director finds the ptag associated with the dead process.
~ the director rereads the process information associated with this ptag from the
master process file.
~ the director issues a log message to inform the system operator that process B2
died and that it will be restarted.
~ the director restarts the process.
For the second scenario, assume that the system was configured with process B2 running.
It is desirable to add the functionality provided by process Al without sh~1ttin~ down the
system. The following steps are undertaken.
~ An entry is added to the master process list for the particular ptag.
~ Using rci, a startup command for that ptag is issued. Specifically, the
command is "rci startup Al"
The startup message is sent by the rci command to the director. The director reads the
master process table to obtain the process information associated with the ptag A 1.
The director starts the process Al and issues a log message to this effect using the
software logging component.
In the third scenario, the configuration of process B2 must be modified. As an example,
process B2 has a configuration parameter that specifies a specific data store. The space
rem~inin~ in this data store exceeds a maximum threshold and new information must be
placed in a new data store. The following steps are undertaken.
The parameter in the configuration file associated with process B2 is modified to reflect
the new data store where the new data items must be stored.
Using rci, a reread config command is issued to process B2. Specifically, the following
comm~n(l is issued: "rci rereadConfig B2"
The message is sent along to process B2.
Upon receiving this message, the process configuration component rereads the config file
and issues a log message to this effect using the software logging component.

~ 02200010
In the fourth scenario, the functionality provided by process B2 is no longer desired. It is
desirable to remove the functionality provided by process B2 without shutting down the
system. The following steps are undertaken.
~ The restart flag for this particular ptag in the master process list is set to 'N'
for no restart.
~ Using rci, a shutdown command for that ptag is issued. Specifically, the
comm~ncl is "rci shutdown B2'7
~ The shutdown message is sent by the rci command to process B2
~ Process B2 shuts down.
~ the director is notified of the process death via Unix signals.
~ the director finds the ptag associated with the dead process.
~ the director rereads the process information associated with this ptag from the
master process f1le and notices that the restart flag is set to no.
~ the director issues a log message stating that process B2 died and will not berestarted.
~ the system operator can then delete the entry associated with the process B2
from the master process table.
The described system thus minimi7:es the downtime

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: First IPC from PCS 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2018-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-03-14
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2003-03-14
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2002-03-14
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-03-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1998-09-14
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1998-09-09
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-09-09
Inactive: Delete abandonment 1998-08-31
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to Office letter 1998-06-17
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 1998-05-19
Inactive: Single transfer 1998-05-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-07-31
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-07-31
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1997-07-31

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-03-14

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2001-03-07

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 1997-03-14
Registration of a document 1998-05-19
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1999-03-15 1999-01-14
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2000-03-14 2000-03-14
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2001-03-14 2001-03-07
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
CROSSKEYS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
RICHARD WACLAWIK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1998-10-23 1 6
Drawings 1997-03-14 1 12
Cover Page 1998-10-23 1 26
Abstract 1997-03-14 1 7
Description 1997-03-14 6 258
Claims 1997-03-14 1 32
Request for evidence or missing transfer 1998-03-17 1 113
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-09-09 1 140
Filing Certificate (English) 1998-09-09 1 174
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1998-11-17 1 110
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-11-15 1 118
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-04-11 1 182
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2002-05-09 1 173
Correspondence 1997-04-08 1 35
Correspondence 1998-05-19 1 44