Language selection

Search

Patent 2201878 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2201878
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR IMPARTING AN ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE TO POWDERS TO RENDER THEM USEFUL FOR COATING APPLICATIONS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE PERMETTANT DE COMMUNIQUER A DES POUDRES UNE CHARGE ELECTROSTATIQUE AUX FINS D'APPLICATIONS DE POUDRAGE ELECTROSTATIQUE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B05D 1/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WILLIAMS, BARBARA E. (United States of America)
  • HARPUR, IAN (United Kingdom)
  • HEARN, GRAHAM (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • ENEXUS CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • ENEXUS CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2000-12-19
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1995-10-03
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1996-04-18
Examination requested: 1997-08-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1995/013095
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1996011068
(85) National Entry: 1997-04-04

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/320,892 (United States of America) 1994-10-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a process for imparting an
electrostatic charge to organic powders to render them useful
for powder coating applications, which comprises forming a
blend of said powders and a polyalkylene ether as an
electrostatically active modifying agent to improve the charge
on said powders, and subjecting said blend to electrically
inductive or conductive conditions, wherein said powders have
a resistivity of from about 10 9 to about 10 13 ohm-meters at
about 20 percent relative humidity. The electrostatically
active modifying agent may also be a polyalkylene glycol or a
polyethoxylated stearyl alcohol.


French Abstract

Procédé permettant d'appliquer une charge électrostatique à une cmposition de poudre résineuse, pour l'application électrostatique d'un revêtement sur des objets solides, et procédé d'application d'un tel revêtement. Cette poudre résineuse comprend: i) une résine thermodurcissable ou thermoplastique et ii) un agent modifiant les propriétés électrostatiques incorporé dans la résine ou appliqué sur sa surface. Le procédé d'application de la poudre consiste à charger les particules de poudre par des moyens d'induction/conduction électrique (28), et à pulvériser la poudre chargée par un ajutage (24) sur un substrat solide (26) mis à la terre, auquel elle adhère avant qu'une fusion thermique ne soit effectuée pour produire un fini permanent.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


26
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for imparting an electrostatic charge to
organic powders to render them useful for powder coating
applications, which comprises forming a blend of said powders
and a polyalkylene ether as an electrostatically active
modifying agent to improve the charge on said powders, and
subjecting said blend to electrically inductive or conductive
conditions, wherein said powders have a resistivity of from
about 10 9 to about 10 13 ohm-meters at about 20 percent
relative humidity.
2. A process for imparting an electrostatic charge to
organic powders to render them useful for powder coating
applications, which comprises forming a blend of said powders
and a polyalkylene glycol as an electrostatically active
modifying agent to improve the charge on said powders, and
subjecting said blend to electrically inductive or conductive
conditions, wherein said powders have a resistivity of from
about 10 9 to about 10 13 ohm-meters at about 20 percent
relative humidity.
3. A process for imparting an electrostatic charge to
organic powders to render them useful for powder coating
applications, which comprises forming a blend of said powders
and a polyethoxylated stearyl alcohol as an electrostatically

27
active modifying agent to improve the charge on said powders,
and subjecting said blend to electrically inductive or
conductive conditions wherein said powders have a resistivity
of from about 10 9 to about 10 13 ohm-meters at about 20 percent
relative humidity.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02201878 1997-OS-21
P~T/US 9 5 / 13 0~ 9 5
pEp,~s 2 5 FED cat
1
WO 96/11068 PCT/US95/13095
1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a process for improving the
electrostatic charge developed on resinous powders for powder coating
applications. In one aspect the invention relates to a process for
coating substrates using the resinous powders having the improved
electrostatic charge. In another aspect the invention relates to a powder
induction/conduction charging system for coating substrates.
2) Background Art
In recent years, much progress has taken place in the field of
electrostatic powder coating. Powder coating, as a separate
technology, developed as a result of a number of clear advantages over
-- other methods of coating such as brushing, dipping and conventional
spraying. These include the inherent advantages due to the absence of
solvent (safer, less harmful to the environment, less expensive, cleaner
working environment) as well as decreasing the time taken for the
coating process to produce an article ready for use. Control of the
coating thickness and the ability to produce a high quality finish from a
single application treatment are also possible with this method.
Much of the early work in the field resulted in methods being
developed which are capable of reaping many of these advantages.
However, there are still a
~"~x~nos~s~.a«

WO 96/11068 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/US95/13095
- 2 -
number of drawbacks within the technology which need
to be overcome.
Powder coating technology is based on the
principle of electrostatic charging and presently
available practical methods of charging are
classified into a corona charging system, a tribo-
electric charging system or a hybrid system. Each
system has evolved from the earliest corona charging
system which is little more than a hollow barrel
through which powder is pneumatically conveyed, with
charging of the powder being accomplished by ionic
attachment at the barrel, or gun exit.
A brief review of each of the current systems
and the reason for the development of the more recent
tribo and hybrid systems is given here to serve as a
background to the present invention.
The basic corona charging system involves
charging by ionic bombardment using an ion source
such as a high voltage corona electrode or
radioactive element. This method is used quite often
to apply charge to highly insulating materials such
as plastics. It can be very inefficient when
applying electrostatic charge to powders since many
of the ions produced do not contribute to the
charging of particles but alight elsewhere, for
example, on the workpiece itself in a powder coating
operation. In some of the worst cases, charging
efficiencies of less than '!~ had been quoted in
corona powder coating equipment.
In the corona charging system, powder is
conveyed from a hopper through feed hoses to a spray

PCT/US95113095
VJ0 96111068
- 3 -
gun. A sharp pointed electrode in the gun is
connected to a high voltage generator and the
combination of electrode geometry and high voltage
(up to 100 kV in some guns) creates an electric field
in excess of the local breakdown strength of the
surrounding gas, which is usually air. A corona
discharge is generated and free ions are formed in
front of the charging electrode. Powder particles
are conveyed through this space charge region and are
charged by ionic attachment. The particles follow
the air-flow pattern and those that are sufficiently
charged are deposited onto the workpiece, which is
generally held at ground potential. The polarity of
the charging electrode can be reversed to create
either a positive or negative charge on the particle,
with a negative charge being generally preferred due
to the larger numbers of ions being produced.
The charging efficiency of this system is very
poor since only a small fraction (- 0.5~) of the ions
produced by the corona contributes to the charge on
the powder. The majority of the ions produced by the
corona gun do not attach to the sprayed powder
particles but travel as 'free ions' to the workpiece
where they accumulate rapidly within the deposited
powder layer.
As more free ions reach the workpiece, the
intensity of the charge within the powder layer
reaches saturation. At this point small
electrostatic discharges (back-ionization) can occur
resulting in disruptions in the coating and,

PCT1US951I3095
WO 96111068
- 4 -
ultimately, a poor quality finish.
The onset of back-ionization essentially limits
s
the useful coating thickness that can be applied
using corona charging powder coating equipment.
Besides requiring a high voltage power supply, a
further disadvantage of corona guns is that they are
not suited for applications requiring penetration
into cavities- and corners. This is due to all the
voltage which appears at the external high voltage
electrode being dropped between the gun head and the
grounded workpiece with subsequent little, or no,
penetration of the field associated with this voltage
into cavities and recesses. These areas then
approximate enclosed Faraday cages. Under these
conditions internal coating will only be achieved by
pneumatically conveying the particles into such
areas, which can be difficult to achieve, while
simultaneously ensuring good coating uniformity
elsewhere. '
Perhaps the most common alternative system to
corona charging is triboelectrification or frictional
charging which takes place when two unlike materials
or surfaces which are previously uncharged, that is
in a electrically neutal state, make contact and then
separate. During this process electrostatic charge
is also separated with one of the surfaces attaining
a postive polarity charge and the other a negative
charge. This process occurs- commonly in everday
life. Examples are_powder being conveyed through a
pipe and a person walking across a carpeted room. In
the latter case, there is friction between the soles

WO 96/11068 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ pCT/US95/13095
- 5 -
of the shoes and the carpet.
The magnitude and even the polarity of
electrostatic charge generated in this way are
heavily dependent on factors such as surface
contamination, moisture content and the nature of the
contact. Although this method of charge generation
is used in electrostatic powder coating, it has
encountered reliability problems.
While a standard corona gun applies a charge of
approximately 1 x 10-3 C/kg to powder particles,
frictional charging transfers a few hundreds of
electronic charge per contact and, therefore, to
obtain charges equal to a corona gun thousands of
contacts are required. The simplest method by which
this is achieved is a straight tube in which there is
turbulent flow, resulting in a large number of
powder/wall collisions. Wall surfaces are ideally
insulators arranged with grounding points so the high
charge built up on the surface can decay to ground.
PTFE, poly(tetrafluroethylene), is usually used in
commercial systems and its place in the tribo-
electric series ensures that most powders charge to a
positive polarity on contact with it.
With tribo-electric guns the free ion current is
eliminated or considerably reduced and, as there is
no applied electric field, the particles are directed
onto the workpiece by a combination of the air flow
and the field produced by the charged powder cloud.
Due to these factors, back ionization does not occur
for 10 to 20 seconds in tribo-electric systems and it
is easier to obtain heavy or thick films with this

WO 96/11068 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US95/13095
- 6 -
system. A further advantage is the ability of the
system to coat inside cavities, small complex parts
and products with sharp~corners, etc. Furthermore,
frictional charging not only overcomes the Faraday
cage effect and reduces back ionization, but
facilitates gun design to accommodate spray heads
that accept different types of nozzles.
The fundamental disadvantage with a tribo gun is
that a decrease in efficient charge exchange occurs
after a prolonged period of operation. A still
further disadvantage is that the particle size
distribution of the powder has a significant effect
on tribo charging and its efficiency. A typical
powder for coating contains a combination of small,
medium and large particles, ranging from sub-micron
size up to greater than 80 microns in diameter. It
is known that within such systems hi-polar charging
of the powder can occur, with smaller particles more
likely to charge to a negative polarity. The
efficiency of charging is a function of the diameter
of the particle and as a result the smallest
particles are not electrostatically attracted to the
workpiece resulting in preferential deposition of the
mid-size range particles. Thus transfer efficiency
i's reduced and so too the overall operational
efficiency of the system due to the increasing build-
up of deposits in the guns and powder collecting and
recycling equipment. Fluidizing problems in the feed
hopper can also occur.
Finally, there are the so called "hybrid" guns
which contain both of the aforementioned methods

R'O 96111065 PCT/US95/13095
22n1~7$
_7_
i.e., corona charging and triboelectrification in one
gun, in an attempt to combine the advantages of both
systems. However, this approach does not remove the
main inherent disadvantages of both guns - poor
powdercharging and transfer efficiency.
The coating efficiency is about 70-75~ at best
using presently available materials for practical
industrial purposes. Any non-deposited powder will
be wasted or must be recovered by use of special
recovery equipment and reused by adding it in small
portions to virgin powder or by recycling it to the
resin preparation step. Manufacturers of powder
coatings claim that it is possible to achieve 97-98$
usage of powders, citing this as an incentive for
switching from wet spray systems where any overspray
is wasted. A flaw in this argument is that to
achieve such high usage dedicated recycle equipment
must be operated on an exclusive basis on each line,
whereby it is not easy to change the type or hue of
the coating material. Thus, the installation cost of
the recovery apparatus and the awkward scheduling of
its operation and the time required for the recovery
add to the total cost.
Accordingly, one or more of the following objects
can be achieved by the practice of the present
invention. It isan object of the present invention
to provide a method of electrostatically charging a
powderfor use in powder coating applications which
is free from the aforementioned'shortcomings. A
further object of the invention is provide a method
for charging powders which allows an electrostatic

WO 96/11068 ~ ~ PCT/US95/13095
_ g _
charge to be developed on the powder in a reliable
and repeatable manner. Another object is to provide
a method which can accurately and reliably control
the quantity and polarity of electrostatic charge
developed and thus insure the coating of all areas of
a workpiece to any required thickness. Another
object of the invention is to provide a process for
applying a charge to thermoplastic and thermosetting
resins which are used in powder coating operations.
Another object is to improve the electrostatic charge
on powders by incorporating an electrostatic property
modifying agent in, or on, the surface of the resin.
A still further object is to provide a process for
applying electrostatically charged powders as a
coating on solid objects. A stil further object is
to provide powders for coating solid objects by
inductive means. Another object is to provide a
process for coating solid objects with a powdered
resin which can be subsequently fused to provide a
uniform and continuous coating on such objects.
Another object of the present invention is to
provide a process for the application of powder
coating to solid objects which is efficient and
minimizes powder waste.
A further object of the invention is to provide
a system useful for spraying the electrostatically
charged powders onto solid objects which can then be
fused to provide a permanent finish. Another object
is to provide a novel system for spraying
electrostatically charged powders onto heated solid
objects whereby fusing of the powder into a

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
9
permanent finish is achieved. These and other ojects will
readily be achieved in light of the teachings herein set
forth.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram depicting the basic
corona charging principle.
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram depicting the basic
tribo charging.
Figure 3(a) is a schematic diagram representing an
object resting on a plate between a neutral electical field.
Figure 3(b) is a schematic diagram depicting an
electrical field applied between the plates of Figure 3(a) by
raising the upper plate to a high voltage wherein induced
charge flows onto the surface of the object.
Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an induction
charging gun showing the nozzle.
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram depicting an
induction charged fluidized bed coater.
Figure 6 is a schematic diagram depicting the
inductive/conductive principle employed in the present
invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In its broad aspect, the present invention is
directed to a process for improving the electrostatic charge
on resinous powders for powder coating applications. The
invention is also directed to a powder inductive charging
system for coating objects and a process using the system for
coating objects.
According to one aspect of the present invention,
there is provided a process for imparting an electrostatic
charge to organic powders to render them useful for powder
70367-113

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
9a
coating applications, which comprises forming a blend of said
powders and a polyalkylene ether as an electrostatically
active modifying agent to improve the charge on said powders,
and subjecting said blend to electrically inductive or conduc-
tive conditions, wherein said powders have a resistivity of
from about 109 to about 1013 ohm-meters at about 20 percent
relative humidity.
According to a further aspect of the present inven-
tion, there is provided a process for imparting an electro-
static charge to organic powders to render them useful for
powder coating applications, which comprises forming a blend
of said powders and a polyalkylene glycol as an electrostat-
ically active modifying agent to improve the charge on said
powders, and subjecting said blend to electrically inductive
or conductive conditions, wherein said powders have a
resistivity of from about 109 to about 1013 ohm-meters at
about 20 percent relative humidity.
According to another aspect of the present inven
tion, there is provided a process for imparting an electro
static charge to organic powders to render them useful for
powder coating applications, which comprises forming a blend
of said powders and a polyethoxylated stearyl alcohol as an
electrostatically active modifying agent to improve the charge
on said powders, and subjecting said blend to electrically
inductive or conductive conditions wherein said powders have a
resistivity of from about 109 to about 1013 ohm-meters at
about 20 percent relative humidity.
In one aspect the invention relates to a process
70367-113

WO 96/11068 PCT/US95/13095
- 10 -
for improving the charge on resinous powders. The
process imparts an electrostatic charge to organic
powders to render them useful for powder coating
applications, and involves forming a blend of the
powders and at least one electrostatically active
modifying agent, and subjecting the blend to
electrically inductive/conductive conditions
sufficient to impart to the powders a resistivity of
from about 109 to about 1013 ohm meters at 20 percent
relative humidity.
Realizing that the drawbacks as previously
enumerated are due to the electrostatics of the
present systems, the current inventors have conducted
extensive and exhausting research into developing a
method which relies on a completely new approach to
the charging of the powder used in electrostatic
powder coating. As a result it has been found
possible to overcome the above drawbacks inherent to
the powder coating process as currently practiced by
developing a method of charging the powder by
influence, having firstly modified the powder by
adding an electrostatically active agent to the resin
powder. The present invention has been accomplished
on the basis of this discovery.
The present invention provides a method for
electrostatically charging a resinous powder by
influence, known either as induction or conduction
charging.
The term "induction" or "inductive" as used
throughout the specification and appended claims,
encompasses both induction and conduction

WO 96111068 ~ PCT/LTS95/13095
- 11 -
electrostatic charging.
The resinous powder composition comprises (i) a
thermosetting or thermoplastic resin and (ii) an
electrostatically active modifying agent incorporated
in, or on, the resin. The modifying agent employed
is one which does not alter the melt or durability
characteristics of the resin powder. The modifying
agent is also useful in promoting the ease with which
the charge is imparted and retained regardless of the
size of the powder particle.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a
method of electrostatically charging a powder for use
in powder coating, free from the above-mentioned
conventional shortcomings which allows an
electrostatic charge to be efficiently and uniformly
developed on the powder in a reliable and repeatable
manner and which, furthermore, can accurately and
reliably control the quantity and polarity of
electrostatic charge developed (thus the ability to
coat all areas of a workpiece evenly to any required
thickness).
The invention also provides a process for
producing a powder intended for surface-coating solid
objects (workpieces) for use with the above-mentioned
method of electrostatic charging.
The objectives of the present invention can be
achieved by placing the modified powder in an area
where an electric field is present, in such a manner
as to allow electric charge to flow onto the powder
particles which, by modification with an
electrostatically active agent, are sufficiently

WO 96/11068 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/US95/13095
-'12 -
conducting to facilitate electrical conduction. This
property of the powder is characterized by its
resistivity (surface or bulk) and generally speaking
the lower the resistivity of the powder the easier it
is to place an electrostatic charge on it by
induction. Once charged, the powder is then
pneumatically transported to the workpiece. The
charge on the powder will decay once deposited with
the rate of decay increasing with decreasing
resistivity. It is very important that the powder
remains attached to the workpiece long enough for the
workpiece to be transported to the curing oven. If
the charge decays too quickly, this can not be
guaranteed. Thus, there are two requirements:
low resistivity for efficient charging and a high
resistivity for longevity of adhesion to the
workpiece.
To meet these contradictory requirements a
number of different countermeasures are proposed.
The first involves a compromise resistivity approach
whereby the resistivity of the powder is modified to
a value of between about 109 -1013 ohm. meters, and
preferably between about 1010-1012 ohmmeter. At
these values, charging to approximately 63$ of a
limiting value (which is a function of particle size,
shape and material as well as the strength of
electric field to which it is exposed) is achieved in
approximately 0.2 to 2 seconds.
Once on the grounded workpiece, charge decay to
37~ of the value to which it had been charged occurs
in the same time frame but the period over which the
image force of attraction operates is sufficiently

wo 96Jiio6s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCTIL1S95/13095
- 13 -
long to allow the establishment of the adhesion
forces, between the particles and the substrate and
between the particles themselves, to develop. These
forces are sufficient to hold the powder on the
workpiece long enough for it to be transported for
permanent fusing in an oven. Curing times are
usually about 2750-4500F. for about 5-10 minutes.
It should be noted that powder particles with
resistivities below the lower limit set forth above,
are not retained on the workpiece or substrate long
enough to establish adhesion, while at a resistivity
above the upper limit the process is difficult to
control.
A second method. involves spraying the charged
powder onto a grounded, heated workpiece. The
temperature of the workpiece is such as to ensure
partial melting of the powder particles as they
alight on it, thus the adhesion to the workpiece is
due to the wetting of the piece by the melted powder
and not to electrostatic forces.
A third method involves a slightly different,
but no less important, application of electrostatic
powder spraying: the finishing of electrically
insulating materials such as plastics or ceramics.
In this case, powder charging and spraying is similar
to that in the conventional finishing of conducting,
grounded workpieces but the electrostatic assist to
ensure deposition and even coating is achieved in a
different manner.
As the workpiece is insulating, no image charge
is induced in it as the charged powder cloud
approaches so the powder will not be attracted to the

WO 96/11068 PCT/US95/13095
workpiece unless it itself is precharged to the
opposite polarity of the charge on the powder. This
can be achieved by corona~charging of the workpiece,
thus setting up a deposition field between the powder
cloud and the workpiece. Coating will continue until
there is no net charge on the workpiece and adhesion
is assured because no charge relaxation can occur
from the insulating workpiece. Other methods are
possible, some dependent on the geometry of the
insulating workpiece, e.g, in the case where it is a
thin sheet or film, coating of one side can be made
possible by placing a conducting substrate on the
. opposite side and placing a voltage on it, opposite
in polarity to the charge on the powder.
A fourth method involves a key discovery made
during the intensive research leading to this
invention The ideal solution to the dichotomous
requirements of low resistivity for efficient
charging and high resistivity for adequate adhesion
can best be met by designing a powder which has a
resistivity which is, in the broadest sense,
situation dependent, this is to say, a resistivity
which is a function of the prevailing conditions at
the charging station and at the workpiece. By
controlling the conditions at both areas, having
first designed the powder to be extremely sensitive
to changes in the environment in which it finds
itself, it has been found possible to ensure low
resistivity at the charging station and high
resistivity at the workpiece.
By examining the activity of various

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
electrostatic property modifying agents (hereinafter referred
to as modifying agentsy as a function of temperature, moisture
cont ent and elect sic f field st rength we have ident if ied a
family of modifying agents which, when added to currently
available powders for powder spraying, modifies the composite
powders resistivity and makes it dependent on the above
mentioned variables of temperature, moisture content and
electric field strength.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
10 As hereinbefore indicated, the resin powder
composition for electrostatic coating of the present invention
comprises a thermosetting or thermoplastic resin and from
0.01 to 20°s by weight of an electrostatic property modifying
agent. This composition may further contain a curing agent, a
pigment, a metal powder filler, a flow controlling agent, a
plasticizes or a stabilizer. In the present invention, the
thermosetting resin may be a conventional type such as an
epoxy resin, a polyester resin or an acrylic resin. Likewise,
thermoplastic resin may be a vinyl chloride resin, a polyamide
resin, a cellulose resin, a polyolefin resin, a polyethylene
resin, a polyester resin or a nylon resin. The resin may be
used alone or in combination as a mixture.
The electrostatic property modifying agent as the
essential component of the present invention is polyalkylene
ether, a polyalklene glycol such as polyethylene glycol, or a
polyethoxylated stearyl alcohol. These compounds may be used
alone or in combination as a mixture of two or more.
70367-113

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
16
The resin powder composition of the present inven-
tion may be readily prepared in accordance with a conventional
method. For example, the binder resin and the modifying agent
may be heated, melted and kneaded by means of a conventional
mixing machine such as a single screw or multi-screw extruder,
a Banbury mixer or heat rolls, then cooled and pulverised to
obtain a powder. Any method commonly employed for the prepar-
ation of a powder mixture, such as any method for mixing a
binder resin powder and a powder of an electrostatic property
modifying agent. In some cases it may be necessary to form a
film on the surface on the binder resin of the electrostatic
property modifying agent by application of mechanical energy
to the mixture. In this case, the ratio of particle diameters
(volume mean) needs to be greater than 10:1, the binder resin
being the larger.
The particle size of the resin powder for coating
according to the present invention is preferably within a
range of from about 10 to about
70367-113

WO 96/11068 ~' ~ PCTlLTS95/13095
- 17 -
250 microns.
The resin powder coating composition of the
present invention may further contain in addition to
the above components, a hardener, a pigment, a metal
powder, a filler, a flow controlling agent, a
plasticizer, a stabilizer and other additives, as the
case requires.
The resin coating powder of the present
invention may be applied to substrates made of
metals, ceramics, plastics, etc. by a powder coating
apparatus which is also disclosed. Various primers
may be applied to such substrates, or various other
pretreatments may be applied to such substrates. The
preferred embodiments of the powder coating apparatus
of the present invention will now be described, but
the invention is not limited to the described
configuration.
The invention will be more readily understood by
reference to the drawings~wherein Figures 1 and 2
depict prior art processes for powder coating
applications. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram
showing the basic corona charging principle while
figure 2 depicts the principle of tribo charging.
Induction/conduction charging relies essentially
on the flow of electrostatic charge over the surface
of the object or material to be charged. For this
reason, the object or material to be charged cannot
be highly electrically insulating. Figure 3(a)
illustrates this effect by showing a large particle
between two parallel electrodes. In the figure there
is no power applied to the electrodes and therefore

WO 96/11068 PCT/LTS95113095
22017
- 18 -
no charge on the particle. In Figure 3(b) a
potential is applied to the electrodes and
electrostatic charge flows from the lower electrode
across the surface of the particle and the particle
becomes charged. If the particle was removed from
the lower electrode and removed from the system, the
charge would be retained by it. It is now charged by
induction.
The same situation would occur if the polarity
of the electrodes was reversed with the lower made to
be the high voltage electrode and the upper grounded.
In this case, the particle would be charged to a
postive polarity.
If the particle was constructed not from an
electrically conductive or partially conductive
material but from from a insulator such as Teflon,
the electrostatic charge from the lower plate would
not be able to flow across the particle surface and
therefore it would not acquire a charge.
It should be noted that the term "induction" can
be applied to cases where the object becoming charged
is either in contact with the ground electrode or the
high voltage electrode. For greater precision,
"induction" is used where the object is in contact
with ground and "conduction" where the object is in
contact with the high voltage source. The situation
is symmetrical and so is the magnitude of the charge
attained.
The important parameters with
induction/conduction charging are the charging and
discharging rates. These are governed by the

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
19
electrical conductivity of the material. The more resistive a
material is, the more time it requires to achieve maximum
charge levels. For example, a metal which is highly conductive
will acquire charge by induction within a fraction of a
microsecond. A doped polymer may require several seconds.
An approximate guide to the rate at which a material
will acquire or dissipate charge by induction/conduction is
given by the following formula:
t = eoerp
where p is resistivity of the material in ohm meters, eo is
the permittivity of free space (8.85 x 10-12), er is the
dielectric constant and t is the time taken for the charge to
reach 63~ of its maximum when charging (or 37~ of its maximum
when discharging).
Both high voltage power supplies and powder feed
systems are established technology. The induction/conduction
charging of the powder will be achieved at the charge transfer
platform, which is one of the key areas of the invention. The
exact design will be varied according to use. To illustrate,
the platform for coating a large and heavy piece conveyed by a
track would in no way resemble the platform for fuse boxes
suspended from an overhead conveyor. The charge platform can
be incorporated either in the gun head or upstream of the gun
such that the powder is charged in advance of ejection rather
that at the point of ejection. In addition it is possible to
incorporate two charging stages, the first stream of the gun
such that pre-charged powder arrives at the ejection point;
70367-113

CA 02201878 1997-06-17
the second use of a high voltage electrode at the gun nozzle
essentially "topping up" the charge on the powder at this
point and using the electric field established between the
high nozzle and the grounded workpiece to assist in transfer
and deposition of the powder.
Figure 3(a) is a schematic diagram representing an
object (2) resting on a plate (3) between a neutral electrical
field. Figure 3(b) is a schematic diagram depicting an
electrical field applied between the plates of Figure 3(a) by
10 raising the upper plate (4) to a high voltage wherein induced
charge flows onto the surface of the object.
Figure 4 illustrates an alternative induction
coating system. The powder is pneumatically transferred to a
region of high electric field at the gun head (5) where it
acquires charge by induction. The charged powder (6) is
transferred to the workpiece (7) by a combination of electric
field and air flow. The introduction of a counter electrode
may intensify the field at this point and improve charging of
increased intensity is required. The effect and the necessity
20 of such an electrode can be determined through analysis of the
f ie ld geomet ry .
Figure 5 illustrates an alternative method of
coating items using an induction/conduction charging
technique. In this case the object (2) to be coated is
suspended above a fluidized bed (8). The powder in the bed is
charged by contact with high voltage electrodes (4) buried in
the powder bulk. The powder coating is transferred to the
workpiece by a
70367-113

CA 02201878 2000-02-08
- 21 -
combination of fluidized air (9) and the
electrostatic attraction forces.
Figure 6 is one representation of the basic
design for a powder induction charging system. It
shows a fluidized bed type electrostatic charger and
powder applicator. Powder is fed continuously to an
electrically insulated bed or zone(10) from powder
reservoir (not shown) through port (12). The whole
bed can sit on a vibrating table (14) which helps
loosen the powder in the bed. Fluidizing air (16) is
fed to beneath the air distributor plate (18) and
transport air enters the bed near the top in a radial
direction from (20) positioned directly opposite
exit port (22) to nozzle (24) which directs the
powder to the substrate (26). An electric field is
set up across the bed, the electrodes being a high
voltage electrode (28) supplied by an extra high
tension source (30). The lower electrode is formed by
the upper layers of the fluidized powder, in contact
with a sintered grounded grid (32). Charge is induced
on the powder as i~ enters the bed and once carried
upwards and out of the bed by the fluidizing and
transport air, this charge is locked on the powder
until it reaches the workpiece. An electric field
created between the high voltage nozzle of the
applicator and the grounded workpiece assists in the
transport and deposition of the charged powder.
The invention will be further explained by
consideration of the following examples:
Example 1
Powder Modification Step
Evlast*1000/1W104, a commercially supplied
*Trade-mark

WO 96/11068 PCT/US95/13095
zzo~~7w
- 22 -
white polyester resin powder manufactured by EVTECH
Co. of North Carolina, USA, was used in this test
example.
The resistivity of the powder at 20~ relative
humidity was determined to be 1.5 X 1015 ohm. meters.
The resistivity was measured using a powder
resistivity measurement cell developed by Wolfson
Electrostatics, University of Southampton, UK.
One kilogram of this powder was mixed with 2~ by
weight of Cyostat LS agent. The mixture was melted,
extruded, cooled and ground to a fine powder. The
resulting powder was further sieved and the portion
passing 150 pm used in this test example.
The resistivity of the test powder at 20~
relative humidity was determined to be 1 x 1011
ohm meters. The volume average diameter of the test
powder was determined to be 40 microns.
A feed of 4g.min-1 of the test powder was
supplied to an apparatus similar to that shown in
Figure 6. Once a sufficient reservoir of powder was
present in the bed, the fluidizing air and transport
air supplies were opened and adjusted so that steady
state conditions were reached, that is, exactly as
much powder left the bed through the nozzle as
entered in the feed. Once these conditions had been
reached, a voltage of 20 kV was applied to the upper
electrode. The gap between the upper-electrode and
the grounded plate was 10 cm, thus a minimum electric
field of 2 kV cm-1 was set up across the bed.
A conductive target plate (test workpiece) of
approximately 100 cm2 was placed 30 cm directly in

CA 02201878 2000-02-08 . .
- 23 -
front of the nozzle. the target plate was grounded
via an electrometer which was capable of measuring
the amount of charge flowing to the plate.
Powder was collected on the plate for 20
seconds, beginning 5 seconds after the voltage was
applied. In this time 1.1g of powder was collected
on the plate, to which 9.4 x 10-8 Couloms of charge
had flown. This indicates that a charge of almost 1
x 10-4 Coulombs per kilogram has been applied to the
powder by induction charging. Such specific charge
levels are sufficient for good powder adhesion. All
of the powders adhered to the plate for at least 2
minutes after the spraying had ceased.
Example 2
Scotchkote*213, a commercially supplied fusion
bonded epoxy resin powder manufactured by the 3 M of
Minnesota, USA was used in this test sample.
One kilogram of this powder was dry mixed with
ZOg of antistat. The powders wer blended together in
a blaring blender until an ordered mixture was
obtained. Before and after modification, the
resistivity of the binder resin and composite powder
was determined to be 3 x 1014 ohmmeters and 1.2 x
109 ohm. meters respectively at 20% relative
humidity. The volume average diameter of the test
powder measured at 25um.
A feed of 3g.min-1 of the test powder was
supplied to the apparatus in a similar manner to
Example 1. Again, an attainment of steady state
conditions, a voltage of 20 kV was applied to the
upper electrode. This time the target plate was
*Trade-mark

w
WO 96/11068 PCTIUS95/13095
2~0't~7y
- 24 -
heated to a surface temperature of 115oC and powder
was sprayed onto the plate for 30 seconds. During
this time 1.358 of powder was transferred to the
plate and a charge of 5.5 x 10-~ Coulombs flowed to
the plate. All of the powder adhered to the plate
with the layer in contact with it fusing.
In addition to replacing conventional powder
coating systems, the present invention finds
applications in other industrial coating areas.
Provided that the material to be applied can be
charged by induction/conduction and that the flow
characteristics of the material are suitable, the use
of induction/conduction as a method of charging has
advantages in number of industrial applications.
For example, there is a great interest in
applying good quality coatings to electrically
insulating materials. One such instance, is the
application of decorative coating to glass, such as
bottles. There is in fact an inherent problem in
achieving this with. conventional electrostatic
systems since the corona discharge on standard
coating equipment produces a high proportion of free-
ions which charge the surface to be coated to the
same polarity as tha applied material. Since the
surface to be coated is electrically insulating, the
charge cannot escape and quickly repels the on-coming
particles resulting in poor transfer efficiency and
poor quality coatings. In the case of an
induction/conduction charged powder, the free-ions
are not produced and therefore this problem does not
arise.

WO 96!11068 PCT/US95113095
- 25 -
There are also a number of other specific
industries where the use of induction/conduction
Charging of powder prior to application to an object
or surface may be advantageous. Application of good
quality coating to insulators, anti-corrosion lining
of pipes and containers, internal coating of light
bulbs, frosting of glass and decorative coatings on
wooden or plastic furniture, can be achieved by the
practice of this invention.
It is also known that popular flavorings such as
chili or cheese and onion on packet snacks are
currently applied in powder form in a relatively
crude manner which is both inefficient and wasteful.
Many foodstuffs fall into a resistivity of 106 - ~0~3
ohmmeters which makes them ideal candidates for
electrostatic induction charging. Also, the snacks
onto which the powdered flavorings are applied are
often themselves imperfect electrical conductors and
this reinforces the advantages of induction charging
due to the absence of free ions.
Although the invention has been illustrated by
the preceding examples, it is not to be construded as
being limited to the materials employed therein, but
rather, the invention relates to the generic area as
hereinbefore disclosed. Various modifications and
embodiments thereof can be made without departing
from the spirit or scope thereof.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2009-10-05
Letter Sent 2008-10-03
Inactive: Entity size changed 2004-10-20
Inactive: Late MF processed 2004-09-30
Inactive: Late MF processed 2004-09-30
Letter Sent 2003-10-03
Inactive: Late MF processed 2003-02-24
Letter Sent 2002-10-03
Inactive: Late MF processed 2001-11-01
Letter Sent 2001-10-03
Grant by Issuance 2000-12-19
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-12-18
Pre-grant 2000-09-13
Inactive: Final fee received 2000-09-13
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-03-13
Letter Sent 2000-03-13
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-03-13
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2000-02-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-02-09
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 1999-12-09
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1997-12-22
Letter Sent 1997-10-15
Letter Sent 1997-10-15
Letter Sent 1997-10-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1997-08-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-08-14
Request for Examination Received 1997-08-14
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1997-07-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-07-10
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1997-06-23
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1997-06-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1997-05-21
Inactive: Single transfer 1997-05-12
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1997-04-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1996-04-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-09-21

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - small 1997-04-04
Registration of a document 1997-05-12
Request for examination - small 1997-08-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 1997-10-03 1997-10-03
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 1998-10-05 1998-10-01
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 1999-10-04 1999-10-04
Final fee - small 2000-09-13
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2000-10-03 2000-09-21
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - small 2001-10-03 2001-11-01
Reversal of deemed expiry 2003-10-03 2001-11-01
Reversal of deemed expiry 2003-10-03 2003-02-24
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - small 2002-10-03 2003-02-24
Reversal of deemed expiry 2003-10-03 2004-09-30
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2003-10-03 2004-09-30
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2004-10-04 2004-09-30
2004-09-30
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2005-10-03 2005-07-19
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2006-10-03 2006-10-03
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2007-10-03 2007-10-03
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ENEXUS CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
BARBARA E. WILLIAMS
GRAHAM HEARN
IAN HARPUR
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2000-02-09 26 1,013
Description 1997-05-21 25 966
Description 1997-06-18 26 1,007
Claims 1997-04-05 1 35
Claims 1997-04-04 3 97
Abstract 1997-04-04 1 53
Drawings 1997-04-04 4 61
Cover Page 1997-07-15 1 53
Description 1997-06-17 26 1,010
Abstract 1997-06-17 1 18
Claims 1997-06-17 2 47
Cover Page 2000-11-30 1 42
Representative drawing 1997-07-15 1 8
Representative drawing 2000-11-30 1 11
Description 2000-12-18 26 1,013
Notice of National Entry 1997-06-23 1 202
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1997-12-22 1 173
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1997-10-15 1 116
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1997-10-15 1 116
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1997-10-15 1 116
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2000-03-13 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-10-31 1 178
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2001-11-20 1 171
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2001-11-20 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-10-31 1 175
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2003-03-03 1 167
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2003-03-03 1 167
Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-12-01 1 174
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2004-10-20 1 166
Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-11-17 1 171
PCT 1997-04-04 3 123
Correspondence 1997-04-29 1 40
PCT 1997-05-21 4 119
PCT 1997-08-15 6 173
Correspondence 2000-09-21 1 29
Correspondence 2000-09-13 1 38
Fees 2004-09-30 2 66
Fees 2005-07-19 1 34
Fees 2006-10-03 1 34
Fees 2007-10-03 1 43