Language selection

Search

Patent 2207451 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2207451
(54) English Title: EXPENDABLE INFRA-RED RADIATING MEANS
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF LARGABLE A RAYONNEMENT INFRAROUGE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F42B 5/15 (2006.01)
  • C06B 33/00 (2006.01)
  • C06C 15/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CALLAWAY, JAMES DOMINIC (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE IN HER MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
(71) Applicants :
  • THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE IN HER MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-07-04
(22) Filed Date: 1997-07-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-02-02
Examination requested: 2002-06-25
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

An expendable infra-red radiating means having a rupturable container 1 housing a plurality of decoy plates (11) and an ignition means (17) for igniting the decoy plates (11). Each of the decoy plates (11) comprises a composition of a metal and an oxidant capable of an exothermic combustion reaction upon ignition which produces negligible quantities of radiation in the visible or ultra-violet regions and which results, after the combustion reaction is completed, in the decoy plates (11) containing hot metal emitting infra-red radiation.


French Abstract

Dispositif largable à rayonnement infrarouge, muni d'un conteneur pouvant se rompre 1, accueillant une pluralité de plaques de leurre (11) et un moyen de mise à feu (17) permettant de mettre à feu les plaques de leurre (11). Chaque plaque de leurre (11) comprend une composition d'un métal et d'un oxydant pouvant entraîner une réaction de combustion exothermique lors de la mise à feu, ce qui produit des quantités négligeables de rayonnement dans les régions visibles ou ultraviolettes, et qui, une fois la réaction de combustion terminée, permet d'obtenir des plaques de leurre (11) contenant un métal chaud émettant un rayonnement infrarouge.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-12-
Claims
1. An expendable infra-red radiating means comprising a rupturable container,
a plurality
of decoy plates housed within the rupturable container and an ignition means
for
igniting the decoy plates wherein the decoy plates comprise a composition of a
metal
and an oxidant capable of an exothermic combustion reaction upon ignition, the
composition being such that the combustion reaction produces negligible
radiation in
the visible or ultra-violet regions and wherein, following completion of the
combustion
reaction, the decoy plate comprises hot metal emitting infra-red radiation.
2 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
composition
of the decoy plates is selected such that the mass of hot metal emitting infra-
red
radiation after combustion of the decoy plate is at least 10% of the mass of
the decoy
plate before combustion.
3 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2
wherein the
composition of the decoy plates comprises a stoichiometric excess of metal.
4. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
composition
of the decoy plates is selected such that a reaction product of the exothermic
combustion reaction between the metal and the oxidant is hot metal emitting
infra-red
radiation.
An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 4 wherein the
metal is a
first metal and the oxidant is an oxide of a second metal

-13-
6. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
metal is
selected from the group consisting of aluminium, iron, calcium, titanium,
silicon and
boron.
7 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
metal is iron
and the oxidant is potassium perchlorate
8 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 7 wherein 82 to
88% by
weight of the decoy plate is iron and 18 to 12% by weight of the decoy is
potassium
perchlorate.
9. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
metal is
aluminium and the oxidant is selected from the group consisting of ferric
oxide, calcium
oxide, tungsten dioxide, tungsten trioxide, manganese dioxide and sodium
chlorate.
10. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 9 wherein the
oxidant is
ferric oxide.
11. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
metal is
titanium and the oxidant is manganese dioxide.
12 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
decoy plates
comprise a pressed composition of a particulate metal and particulate oxidant.
13 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
decoy plate
composition further comprises a binder material.

-14-
14 An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
thicknesses
of the decoy plates are adapted such that, in use, at least some of the decoy
plates break
up on dispersal from the rupturable container.
15. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
decoy plates
have grooves running across the surface.
16. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
decoy plate
composition is adapted such that at least some of the hot metal remaining
after the
combustion of a decoy plate is molten
17. An expendable infra-red radiating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
plurality of
decoy plates are interlayered with combustible cloth material
18 An expendable infra-red radiating means as substantially hereinbefore
described with
reference to figures 1 to 3 of the attached drawings.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-1-
Expendable Infra-red Radiating Means
The present invention relates to a covert, expendable infra-red (IR) radiating
means and
in particular to a covert countermeasure or decoy flare capable of generating
an IR interference
cloud to divert an incoming missile equipped with an IR seeker system away
from its intended
target or to create a covert JR screen.
Known IR decoy flares conventionally comprise pyrotechnic compositions bound
together with an organic binder and pressed to form pellets. When an incoming
missile is
detected a pellet is ignited and launched from the target. The pellet burns
over its surface to
produce an intense infra-red source which can lure the infra-red seeker system
of the missile
away from the target.
However, advances in missile seeker systems and the development of
`intelligent' missile
systems have led to seeker systems which are designed to recognise the typical
characteristics of
a decoy flare and ignore it. Some advanced seeker systems are programmed with
a
characteristic infra-red signature of the intended target, the exhaust plume
of a jet aircraft for
example, and will ignore the almost point like radiating source of a
conventional flare.
There has therefore become a need for a countermeasure which radiates over a
large
area, either to appear more like the intended target to the missile system or
to act as a screen,
especially for larger or slower moving targets.
One known decoy flare which is capable of generating a large cloud emitting in
the
infra-red range is described in the patent US 4 624 186. This flare comprises
a casing containing
combustible flakes and an ignition expediting material. These combustible
flakes comprise a thin
base material, such as paper or metal foil, on to which is pressed a
phosphorus containing
incendiary paste. In use, the flare is launched into the air and the ignition
expediting material
creates a fireball which passes through the combustible flakes, igniting the
incendiary paste
which burns to emit IR radiation and spreading the flakes which float slowly
downward creating
the interference cloud.
One problem with this type of flare is that phosphorus has a characteristic IR
emission
spectrum which some `intelligent' seeker systems can be programmed to ignore.
Also, these

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-2-
types of flares are quite expensive. Further this type of flare also radiates
in the visible and ultra-
violet (UV) regions and produces a large, visible smoke cloud. This has the
disadvantage of
revealing that a countermeasure has been deployed which can indicate that a
certain threat has
been detected.
Furthermore, some `intelligent' seeker systems use other radiation, for
example UV
emission, when deciding to ignore some IR sources and are therefore not
deflected by flares
emitting significant amounts of radiation the visible or UV regions. Also,
some missile
systems, for example ones often employed in ground based anti-aircraft
batteries, require
human operators to make an initial target acquisition for a particular missile
before the IR
seeker system of that missile guides it to its acquired target. This target
acquisition is done
visually and hence, particularly at night, illumination of the target by the
visible emission
from the decoy is undesirable.
One known type of covert flare uses Activated Metal Disks (AMDs). These are
disks of
metals made pyrophoric by a process described in US patent 4,895,609. The
disks are held in a
store which, on ejection from the target, ruptures to dispense the disks. As
the disks are
pyrophoric they ignite on contact with the air and burn to act as a decoy.
However this type of flare is expensive to produce and, due to the pyrophoric
nature of
the disks, has a relatively large delay before becoming effective as the disks
have to be ejected
and dispensed before ignition can occur. For some applications, e.g. for fast
moving vehicle
decoys, the narrow field of view of some modern seeker systems means that the
disks can be
outside the missiles effective vision by the time combustion is fully underway
and will not
therefore be effective as a decoy. Also, the mass of a flare of this type can
be significantly
greater than standard IR flares.
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to provide an JR radiator
which alleviates
at least some of the aforementioned problems.
According to the present invention there is provided an expendable infra-red
radiating
means comprising a rupturable container, a plurality of decoy plates housed
within the
rupturable container and an ignition means for igniting the decoy plates
wherein

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-3-
the decoy plates comprise a composition of a metal and an oxidant capable of
an
exothermic combustion reaction upon ignition, the composition being selected
such that the
combustion reaction produces negligible radiation in the visible and ultra
violet regions and
wherein following completion of the combustion reaction the decoy plate
comprises hot
metal emitting infra-red radiation.
In use the container is deployed into the air and the decoy plates are ignited
by the
ignition means. The container is then ruptured, for example by build up of
pressure within
the container, to dispense the decoy plates to form a cloud of IR radiation
sources.
Use of a composition of a metal and an oxidant capable of an exothermic
combustion reaction upon ignition for the decoy plates provides a relatively
inexpensive
flare capable of generating a cloud of material which is emitting strongly in
the IR range.
As the combustion reaction primarily produces heat, which may be stored in the
hot
metal which remains after the reaction has ended, the decoy plates, during and
after
combustion, produce negligible amounts of radiation in the visible or UV
regions. In
daylight, when the decoy plates are deployed as a screen or as a decoy flare,
the small
amount of visible radiation will not be seen against the background light.
Even at night, the
dispersal of the disks means that the glow of the plates in the visible region
will be virtually
undetectable at the ranges concerned. Therefore the countermeasure may be
deployed
covertly. Also a missile seeker system will not see any radiation in the UV
region which
would be characteristic of a decoy flare.
Metal present after the combustion of the decoy plate will be hot due to the
heat
generated during combustion and therefore will be emitting in the IR range but
will have
negligible visible or UV radiation. The decoy is therefore effective beyond
the duration of
combustion of the decoy plates and a decoy cloud having a relatively long
duration can be
produced without the need for slow burning compositions.
As a consequence the duration of the combustion reaction can actually be
reduced
and fast burning compositions can be chosen for their heat generation
properties. The
combustible composition also has a fast ignition time and the decoy plates can
be ignited

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-4-
before dispersal ensuring that the plates become effective within the missiles
field of view.
Minimising the duration of the ignition of the decoy plates is also
advantageous because the
ignition reaction produces not only heat but visible and ultra-violet (UV)
emission.
A further advantage is that the IR emission spectrum of the decoy plate after
the
combustion reaction has finished will be characteristic of hot metal which is
to be expected
from a target, for example the hot metal parts of a tank engine or an aircraft
exhaust, and
will not include any components which the seeker system will recognise as
artificial and
characteristic of a decoy.
Also, the electrical conduction of the plates and any metal existing after
reaction
means that the cloud produced is formed of conducting elements which could
reflect radio
frequency (RF) signals and therefore act as a large RADAR reflective surface.
The cloud,
due to its conducting properties, could also both reflect any RF signals
generated by the
target thereby possibly confusing any systems which look for these signals or
alternatively
could scatter any incident RADAR pulses which may result in deflecting a
system which
uses active RADAR guidance.
In order to ensure that the decoy functions effectively after combustion the
composition of the decoy plates is preferably selected such that the mass of
hot metal
emitting infra-red radiation after combustion of a decoy plate is at least 10%
of the mass of
the decoy plate before combustion. For a decoy relying on hot metal remaining
after the
reaction, the amount of that metal remaining should be at least 10% of the
mass of the
decoy plate to ensure that the plates are acting efficiently.
Preferably the composition of the decoy plates comprises an excess of metal.
Ignition and combustion of a decoy plate produces heat due to the combustion
reaction between the metal and the oxidant. The excess metal does not undergo
reaction
and absorbs a lot of the heat generated during the reaction thereby resulting
in hot metal
remaining after the end of the reaction.

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-5-
It will be clear to one skilled in the art that by varying the ratio of metal
to oxidant
present in the composition of the decoy plates, the amount of metal remaining
after the
reaction can be altered, as can the amount of heat generated.
Advantageously the composition of the decoy plates is selected such that a
reaction
product of the exothermic combustion reaction between the metal and the
oxidant is hot
metal emitting infra-red radiation.
By producing metal in the combustion reaction then the proportion of the decoy
plate which undergoes reaction can be high whilst retaining the advantages of
having metal
present after the reaction has finished. Thus the proportion of excess metal
could be
reduced, which could result in more heat being generated, whilst retaining the
same
proportion of metal present after reaction.
Alternatively production of a metal in the combustion reaction means that all
the
metal of the decoy plate could take part in the combustion reaction and there
would still be
hot metal at the end of the reaction. This could allow the metal of the plate
to be chosen
because of its properties as a fuel whereas the metal produced could be
selected for its
thermal properties, for instance thermal conductivity or melting point.
Metal may conveniently be produced by ensuring that the metal of the decoy
plate is
a first metal and the oxidant is an oxide of a second metal. Upon ignition the
first metal
and second metal oxide undergo a combustion reaction wherein the oxide of the
second
metal dissociates to produce the second metal and the first metal reacts with
the dissociated
oxygen to form an oxide of the first metal.
Suitable metal fuels liberate large amounts of heat in the combustion reaction
and
include aluminium, iron, calcium, titanium, silicon and boron although it will
be apparent to
one skilled in the art that other metals could be used. The oxidant must
obviously be such
that it will be reduced in the combustion reaction and liberate sufficient
heat and the skilled
worker could easily determine suitable oxidants for a given metal fuel. For
aluminium, for
example, suitable oxidants include ferric oxide, calcium oxide, tungsten
dioxide or trioxide,
manganese dioxide and sodium chlorate.

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-6-
One advantageous composition of a decoy plate has iron as the metal and
potassium
perchlorate as the oxidant. This composition is inexpensive and reliable and
burns to
produce potassium chloride and oxides of iron. Preferably 82 to 88% by weight
of the
decoy plate is iron and 18 to 12% by weight of the decoy plate is potassium
perchlorate.
This ratio is optimised to give maximum thermal and electrical conduction
before, during
and after combustion, due to the excess iron.
An alternative composition in which metal is produced has aluminium as the
metal
and ferric oxide as the oxidant. This composition burns to produce iron and
aluminium
oxide. A nearly stoichiometric composition of aluminium and ferric oxide is
preferably
used in order to maximise efficiency.
A further composition which could be used, in which metal is produced, has
titanium as the metal and manganese dioxide as the oxidant. This composition
burns to
produce manganese and oxides of titanium. It will be apparent to one skilled
in the art
however that other such compositions could be used.
Preferably the decoy plates comprise a pressed composition of a particulate
metal
and particulate oxidant.
Pressing the composition to form the decoy plates offers an inexpensive and
simple
method of manufacture with reliable results. The size of the particles has an
effect on the
heat of the reaction and can be varied for different applications although it
will be apparent
to one skilled in the art to choose particle sizes that are not too large as
to give inefficient
burning or problems with ignition but that are not too small as to lead to
problems with
safety and uncontrollability with the plates being too sensitive. The pressing
loads will
likewise be such to ensure good metal to oxidant contact.
The decoy plate composition may advantageously further comprise a binder
material to improve the stability of the plates and to modify the thermal
characteristics of
the plates.
Advantageously the thicknesses of the decoy plates are adapted such that, in
use, at
least some of the decoy plates break up on dispersal from the rupturable
container. The

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-7-
shock of ejection into the atmosphere from the rupturable container causes
thin plates to
break up on ejection. This results in a cloud having IR emitting pieces of
differing sizes.
The differing sized pieces would have different air resistances which would
aid in spreading
the cloud over a large area. Also the varying sized pieces, because of their
conductive
properties, could have a greater RADAR reflection potential.
Most usefully the decoy plates have grooves running across the surface.
Grooves
aid in fracturing of plates, especially after the combustion reaction between
the metal and
the oxidant, and may either compliment or be an alternative to thin plates.
Grooves give
more control over the sizes of pieces produced, which could be tailored to the
wavelengths
of the likely RADAR signals. The addition of grooves to the decoy plates also
speeds the
ignition times of the plates by allowing hot ignition gases to pass along the
grooves
The decoy plate composition may also be adapted such that at least some of the
hot
metal produced by the combustion of a decoy plate is molten. By selecting the
composition
of the decoy plates such that the hot metal produced has a melting point lower
than the
temperature reached by the exothermic combustion reaction then at least some
of that
metal produced will be molten.
Molten metal will radiate in the IR region and will quickly cool enough to
solidify
forming various shapes, from droplets to misshapen plates depending upon the
proportion
of metal which was molten initially. These shapes produced will be more
effective at
scattering incident RADAR radiation and will have a greater range of
reflective
characteristics.
Conveniently the decoy plates are interlayered with combustible cloth
material. The
cloth can act as a spacer to reduce the weight of the decoy and can aid in
dispersal of the
decoy plates by reducing the tendency of the plates to stick to one another.
Also,
combustible cloth will contribute to the effectiveness of the decoy and can be
chosen to
produce negligible visible or UV radiation.
Further advantages and embodiments of the invention will now be described by
way
of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-8-
Figure 1 shows a sectional view of a decoy flare according to the present
invention,
Figure 2 shows a decoy plate suitable for use in the flare shown in figure 1,
Figure 3 shows a plot of relative intensity of infra-red radiation against
time
for ignition of a typical decoy plate suitable for use in a flare according to
the present invention,
Referring now to figure 1, a rupturable container, generally indicated 1, has
a cylindrical
casing 3 with an open end, the open end being sealed by a lid 5. The lid 5 is
held in place as
the edges 7 of the open end of the casing 3 are slightly crimped into a groove
9 in the lid 5.
A plurality of decoy plates 11 are stacked in the casing 3.
One type of decoy plate suitable for use in this flare is shown in figure 2.
The decoy
plate is in the form of a disk 11 provided with a central hole 13. The disk 11
has a diameter
of about 45mm and a thickness of 0.6mm with the central hole 13 having a
diameter of
6mm. Grooves 15 extend radially from the central hole 13 to the edge of the
disk, the
grooves being about 1 mm wide and 0.4mm deep.
In one particular embodiment the disk 11 is formed from a particulate
composition
of 86% by weight iron (Fe) and 14% by weight potassium perchlorate (KC1O4)
pressed
together under a load of about 100MPa. The iron particles are around 5-15 m in
size and
the potassium perchlorate particles are greater than 454m in size. Upon
ignition the iron
and potassium perchlorate undergo a combustion reaction to produce oxides of
iron and
potassium chloride the principle reaction being;
3Fe + KC1O4 --> KCl + Fe3O4 + Heat (1)
It can be seen that as the atomic weight of iron is about 56 and that of
potassium
perchlorate is about 90 then the stoichiometric mixture would have about 65%
by weight

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
...................
-9-
iron with 35% by weight of potassium perchlorate. It is apparent therefore
that
approximately 60% by weight of the disk is present as excess iron. However, in
use the
production of other iron oxides would occur and the reaction would be
complemented by
oxygen in the atmosphere thus the actual amount of excess iron would be lower
than this.
The typical temperature reached by such a disk would be around 1000 with a
burn rate of
about l0cm/s.
In an alternative embodiment the disk 11 comprises a pressed particulate
composition of aluminium (Al) and ferric oxide (Fe2O3). Upon ignition of this
mixture the
aluminium and ferric oxide undergo a combustion reaction to produce iron and
aluminium
oxide, the principle reaction being;
2A1 + Fe2O3 -4 2Fe + A1203 + Heat (2)
Here it can be seen that the reaction produces iron thus ignition of the disk
11 results in the
production of red hot iron. The disk 11 has a nearly stoichiometric ratio of
aluminium to
ferric oxide with 30% by weight of the disk being aluminium.
In a third embodiment the disk 11 could comprise a pressed particulate
composition
of titanium (Ti) and manganese dioxide (Mn02) which, on ignition undergoes a
combustion
reaction produce manganese and oxides of titanium, one of the principle
reactions being;
Ti + Mn02 --+ Mn + TiO2 + Heat (3)
It will, of course, be apparent to one skilled in the art that other suitable
metal fuels
and oxidants could be used.
Referring back to figure 1 the plates 11 are stacked with an ignition cord 17
running
from adjacent the lid 5 through the centre of the decoy plates 11 to form a
coil 19 at the
closed end of the casing 3. The ignition cord has its primed end 21 located
adjacent an
ignition transfer means 23 in the lid 5. A piston 25, such as a millboard,
plastic or

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-10-
aluminium disk, for example, having a diameter equal to or just less than that
of the interior
of the casing, is located between the ignition cord 21 and the stack of decoy
plates 11.
For certain applications the decoy plates can be stacked interlayered with a
combustible cloth (not shown) in order to reduce the tendency for the ignited
plates to stick
to one another and to reduce the amount of plates in the stack and therefore
the weight of
the decoy.
In use pyrotechnic mixture 25 is ignited by, for example, a standard
electrical igniter
(not shown), and the rupturable container is deployed into the air. Once the
rupturable
container is clear of its housing spring 27 is released allowing the ignition
stimulus to travel
down tube 29 to ignite delay 23. Delay 23 allows the flare to move away from
its housing
before igniting primed end 21 of the ignition cord 17. Should the rupturable
container
become jammed spring 27 prevents propagation of the ignition stimulus thus
preventing the
decoy flare from igniting inside its housing.
Ignition of the primed end 21 of the ignition cord 17 causes the cord to
quickly
combust, igniting the decoy plates 11 as the fireball passes down the cord.
The gasses
generated from this combustion and ignition of the decoy plates 11 causes a
build up of
pressure in the casing which is enough to the eject the lid 5. The first few
decoy plates 11
will probably fall out of the casing. Meanwhile the combustion of the ignition
cord coil 19
produces a large amount of gas which drives the piston 25 to eject the ignited
decoy plates
11.
Generally the dispersion of the decoy plates 11 may be altered by choosing an
ignition train which generates more or less gas. A useful ignition cord may
be, for example,
a magnesium/Viton/Teflon (MTV) ignition cord which generates useful quantities
of gas to
disperse the plates over a large area.
The typical variation in intensity of the total IR radiation emission of a
decoy plate
not having a grooved surface is shown in figure 3. The plate ignited was a
0.5mm thick
disk of 86% iron and 14% potassium perchlorate having a diameter of 47mm.
It can be seen from the plot that even without grooves in the surface the disk
shows
a very fast rise time from ignition to maximum intensity, ensuring that the
decoy starts

CA 02207451 1997-07-11
-11-
operating within the field of view of the missile. The peak intensity drops
relatively rapidly
but the intensity stays moderately high for a long duration due to the
radiating metal
present after reaction. Thus the flare offers a fast response coupled with a
long duration
and is suitable for use with fast or slow targets. Also, whilst the initial
ignition may trigger
a countermeasures device and cause the missile to ignore its guidance system
for a short
time, when the guidance comes back on line the decoy will still be radiating
and acting as a
decoy but without any of the telltale characteristics of known decoys.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2017-07-11
Grant by Issuance 2006-07-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-07-03
Pre-grant 2006-04-21
Inactive: Final fee received 2006-04-21
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-10-28
Letter Sent 2005-10-28
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-10-28
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-08-09
Change of Address Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-07-13
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2005-06-27
Letter Sent 2005-02-24
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2005-02-02
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-02-01
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2004-12-24
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2004-12-22
Letter Sent 2004-12-15
Inactive: Reversal of dead status 2004-12-15
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2004-12-15
Inactive: <RFE date> RFE removed 2004-12-11
Inactive: <RFE date> RFE removed 2004-12-11
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2004-12-09
Inactive: Reversal of dead status 2004-12-09
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2004-12-07
Inactive: Released from secrecy 2004-12-07
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2004-12-07
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2004-12-07
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 2004-12-07
Inactive: Dead - RFE never made 2003-07-11
Inactive: Dead - RFE never made 2003-07-11
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2002-07-11
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2002-07-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-06-25
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2002-06-25
Inactive: Single transfer 1997-09-03
Application Received - Regular National 1997-08-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-06-20

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE IN HER MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Past Owners on Record
JAMES DOMINIC CALLAWAY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1997-07-11 11 578
Abstract 1997-07-11 1 16
Claims 1997-07-11 3 100
Drawings 1997-07-11 2 61
Representative drawing 2005-01-05 1 14
Cover Page 2005-01-21 2 44
Cover Page 2006-06-02 2 46
Description 2011-11-25 11 578
Claims 2011-11-25 3 100
Reminder - Request for Examination 2004-12-07 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2004-12-15 1 177
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-10-28 1 161
Prosecution correspondence 1997-07-11 14 654
Correspondence 1997-07-11 9 401
Fees 2000-07-04 2 73
Fees 1999-06-22 2 64
Fees 2003-06-18 2 55
Fees 2001-07-03 2 66
Fees 2002-06-17 2 63
Fees 2004-06-15 2 61
Correspondence 2005-02-24 1 14
Correspondence 2005-06-27 1 51
Correspondence 2006-04-21 1 40