Language selection

Search

Patent 2216582 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2216582
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SCANNING, OPTIMIZING AND EDGING A BOARD WITH AN ACTIVE EDGER
(54) French Title: METHODE ET APPAREIL DE DETECTION, D'OPTIMISATION ET D'ELIGNAGE DE PLANCHE AVEC UNE SCIE A DELIGNER ACTIVE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B27B 3/18 (2006.01)
  • B27B 1/00 (2006.01)
  • B27B 5/04 (2006.01)
  • B27B 33/20 (2006.01)
  • B27L 11/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MICHELL, STEVEN W. (Canada)
  • NEWNES, WILLIAM R. (Canada)
  • STROUD, BRIAN T. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • USNR/KOCKUMS CANCAR COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • NEWNES MACHINE LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-11-25
(22) Filed Date: 1997-09-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-03-24
Examination requested: 1999-09-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

An active edger includes an actively positionable gangsaw or a first end saw either mounted on an arbor mounted within a stationary saw box, wherein the gangsaw or first end saw is actively positionable relative to the saw box, or mounted on an arbor in fixed translational and skewing relation relative to, and within, an actively positionable saw box. In the latter embodiment the actively positionable gangsaw is selectively actively laterally translatable and selectively actively rotatable so as to skew the gangsaw relative to the saw box. In both embodiments, the saw box receives a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed in a downstream direction, longitudinally into the gangsaw or first end saw from an upstream position. A first chipping head, mounted to a first side of the saw box adjacent and downstream of the first end saw or a first end saw in the gangsaw is, in the first embodiment, selectively actively laterally positionable so as to align with a first feed line corresponding to the first end saw in unison with active positioning of the gangsaw, relative to the workpiece. In both embodiments, the first chipping head actively corresponds, in a lateral chipping depth, to a lateral edging dimension of a sawn edging sawn from the workpiece. The sawn edging is chipped as the workpiece is conveyed from, once sawn by, the gangsaw, longitudinally past the first chipping head.


French Abstract

Une scie à déligner active inclut une scie alternative activement positionnable ou une scie de première extrémité soit montée sur une tige dans un boîtier de scie fixe, dans lequel la scie alternative ou la scie de première extrémité est activement positionnable par rapport au boîtier de la scie, soit montée sur une tige dans un rapport de translation fixe et de biaisement relatif et à l'intérieur, un boîtier de scie activement positionnable. Dans la deuxième réalisation, la scie alternative activement positionnable est sélectivement et activement transportable latéralement et sélectivement et activement rotative afin d'incliner la scie alternative par rapport au boîtier de la scie. Dans les deux modes de réalisation, le boîtier de la scie reçoit une pièce, longitudinalement déplacée en direction de l'aval et longitudinalement placée dans la scie alternative ou la scie de première extrémité depuis un emplacement situé en amont. Une première tête déligneuse, montée sur un premier côté du boîtier de la scie adjacent et en aval de la scie de première extrémité ou d'une scie de première extrémité dans la scie alternative est, dans le premier mode de réalisation, sélectivement et activement positionnable latéralement afin de s'aligner avec une première ligne d'alimentation correspondant avec la scie de première extrémité simultanément avec le positionnement actif de la scie alternative, par rapport à la pièce. Dans les deux modes de réalisation, la première tête déligneuse correspond activement, dans une profondeur de délignage latérale, à une dimension de la bordure latérale d'un liséré scié découpé dans la pièce. Le liséré scié est déligné pendant que la pièce est déplacée, une fois sciée, par la scie alternative, longitudinalement devant la première tête déligneuse.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. An active edger comprising:
an actively positionable gangsaw mounted on an arbor mounted within a
stationary saw
box, said gangsaw actively positionable relative to said saw box, said gangsaw
for
receiving a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed in a downstream direction,
longitudinally
into said gangsaw from an upstream position,
a first chipping head, mounted to a first side of said saw box adjacent and
downstream of a
first end saw in said gangsaw, said first chipping head selectively actively
laterally
positionable, so as to align with a first feed line corresponding to said
first end saw in
unison with active positioning of said gangsaw, relative to said workpiece, to
thus actively
correspond, in a lateral chipping depth, to a lateral dimension of a sawn
edging sawn from
said workpiece, in chipping engagement with said sawn edging of said workpiece
as said
workpiece is conveyed from, once sawn by, said gangsaw and longitudinally past
said first
chipping head so as to reduce said sawn edging into chips.
2. The active edger of claim 1 further comprising a second actively laterally
positionable
chipping head mounted to a second side of said saw box, opposite to said first
side of said
saw box.
3. The active edger of claim 2 wherein said second chipping head is downstream
of a second
end saw in said gangsaw, actively laterally positionable so as to actively
align with a
second feed line corresponding to said second end saw, and so as to actively
laterally
position in unison with said second end saw.
17

4. The active edger of claim 3 wherein said second chipping head is adjacent
said second end
saw and mounted in generally opposed facing relation to said first chipping
head.
5. The active edger of claim 2 wherein said second chipping head is
staggered, relative to
said first chipping head, in a downstream direction.
6. The active edger of claim 4 wherein said first and second chipping heads
are aligned with
toe-in relative to alignment of said first and second end saws.
7. The active edger of claim 5 wherein said first and second chipping heads
are aligned with
toe-in relative to alignment of said first and second end saws.
8. An active edger comprising:
a gangsaw mounted on an arbor within an actively positionable saw box, said
gangsaw for
receiving a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed in a downstream direction,
longitudinally
into said gangsaw from an upstream position, said saw box actively
positionable by
selective lateral translation and selective rotation relative to said
longitudinal conveyance
of said workpiece in said downstream direction, a first chipping head, mounted
to a first
side of said saw box adjacent and downstream of a first end saw in said
gangsaw, said first
chipping head to align with a first feed line corresponding to said first end
saw and actively
positionable in unison with said first end saw of said gangsaw, relative to
said workpiece,
to thus actively correspond, in a lateral chipping depth, to a lateral
dimension of a sawn
edging sawn from said workpiece, in chipping engagement with said sawn edging
of said
workpiece as said workpiece is conveyed from, once sawn by, said first end saw
within
said gangsaw and longitudinally past said first chipping head so as to reduce
said sawn
edging into chips.
18

9. The active edger of claim 8 further comprising a second actively laterally
positionable
chipping head mounted to a second side of said saw box, opposite to said first
side of said
saw box.
10. The active edger of claim 9 wherein said second chipping head is
downstream of a second
end saw in said gangsaw, mounted on said arbor, actively laterally
positionable so as to
actively align with a second feed line corresponding to said second end saw,
and so onto
actively laterally position in unison with said second end saw.
11. The active edger of claim 10 wherein said second chipping head is adjacent
said second
end saw and mounted in generally opposed facing relation to said first
chipping head.
12. The active edger of claim 9 wherein said second chipping head is
staggered, relative to
said first chipping head, in a downstream direction.
13. The active edger of claim 1 wherein said actively positionable gangsaw is
selectively
actively laterally translatable and selectively actively rotatable so as to
skew said gangsaw
relative to said saw box, and wherein saw guides corresponding to saws within
said
gangsaw, and mounted in guiding engagement thereon, are selective rotatable
about
corresponding generally vertical axes of rotation whereby rotating said guides
skews said
saws.
14. The active edger of claim 13 further comprising selective rotatable
generally vertical shafts
corresponding to said guides, and rigidly mounted thereto, selective rotation
means for
selectively rotating said shafts about their longitudinal axes to thereby
rotate said guides
and said saws.
19

15. The active edger of claim 14 wherein said selective rotation means are
actuator driven
worms and mating worm gears for selective rotation of said shafts.
16. The active edger of claim 1 or 8 wherein said first chipping head
comprises V-shaped
chipping head knives mounted thereon.
17. The active edger of claim 1 or 8 further comprising an anvil cooperating
with said first
chipping head so as to direct said sawn edgings into said chipping head.
18. The active edger of claim 17 wherein said anvil further comprises a side
fence mounted
laterally outward on said anvil so as to register with said sawn edging
whereby said edging
is forced back into said feed line.
19. An active edger comprising:
an actively positionable first end saw mounted on an arbor, said arbor mounted
within a
stationary saw box, said first end saw actively positionable relative to said
saw box, said
first end saw for receiving a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed in a
downstream
direction, longitudinally into said first end saw from an upstream position,
a first chipping head, mounted to a first side of said saw box adjacent and
downstream of
said first end saw said first chipping head selectively actively laterally
positionable, so as
to align with a first feed line corresponding to said first end saw, in unison
with active
positioning of said first end saw, relative to said workpiece, to thus
actively correspond, in
a lateral chipping depth, to a lateral dimension of a sawn edging sawn from
said
workpiece, in chipping engagement with said sawn edging of said workpiece as
said
workpiece is conveyed from, once sawn by, said first end saw and
longitudinally past said
first chipping head so as to reduce said sawn edging into chips.

20. The active edger of claim 19 further comprising a second actively
laterally positionable
chipping head mounted to a second side of said saw box, opposite to said first
side of said
saw box.
21. The active edger of claim 20 wherein said second chipping head is
downstream of a
second end saw mounted on said arbor, actively laterally positionable so as to
actively
align with a second feed line corresponding to said second end saw, and so as
to actively
laterally position in unison with said second end saw.
22. The active edger of claim 21 wherein said second chipping head is adjacent
said second
end saw and mounted in generally opposed facing relation to said first
chipping head.
23. The active edger of claim 20 wherein said second chipping head is
staggered, relative to
said first chipping head, in a downstream direction.
24. The active edger of claim 22 wherein said first and second chipping heads
are aligned with
toe-in relative to alignment of said first and second end saws.
25. The active edger of claim 23 wherein said first and second chipping heads
are aligned with
toe-in relative to alignment of said first and second end saws.
26. An active edger comprising:
a first end saw mounted on an arbor, said arbor mounted within an actively
positionable
saw box, said first end saw for receiving a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed
in a
downstream direction, longitudinally into said first end saw from an upstream
position,
said saw box actively positionable by selective lateral translation and
selective rotation
relative to said longitudinal conveyance of said workpiece in said downstream
direction, a
21

first chipping head, mounted to a first side of said saw box adjacent and
downstream of a
first end saw in said saw box, said first chipping head aligned with a first
feed line
corresponding to said first end saw, and actively positionable in unison with
said first end
saw, relative to said workpiece, to thus actively correspond, in a lateral
chipping depth, to
a lateral dimension of a sawn edging sawn from said workpiece, in chipping
engagement
with said sawn edging of said workpiece as said workpiece is conveyed from,
once sawn
by, said first end saw and longitudinally past said first chipping head so as
to reduce said
sawn edging into chips.
27. The active edger of claim 26 further comprising a second actively
laterally positionable
chipping head mounted to a second side of said saw box, opposite to said first
side of said
saw box.
28. The active edger of claim 27 wherein said second chipping head is
downstream of a
second end saw mounted on said arbor actively laterally positionable so as to
actively align
with a second feed line corresponding to said second end saw, and so onto
actively
laterally position in unison with said second end saw.
29. The active edger of claim 28 wherein said second chipping head is adjacent
said second
end saw and mounted in generally opposed facing relation to said first
chipping head.
30. The active edger of claim 27 wherein said second chipping head is
staggered, relative to
said first chipping head, in a downstream direction.
31. The active edger of claim 19 wherein said actively positionable first end
saw is selectively
actively laterally translatable and selectively actively rotatable so as to
skew said first end
saw relative to said saw box, and wherein saw guides corresponding to first
end saw, and
22

mounted in guiding engagement thereon, are selectively rotatable about
corresponding
generally vertical axes of rotation whereby rotating said guides skews said
first end saw.
32. The active edger of claim 31 further comprising selective rotatable
generally vertical shafts
corresponding to said guides, and rigidly mounted thereto, selective rotation
means for
selectively rotating said shafts about their longitudinal axes to thereby
rotate said guides
and said saws.
33. The active edger of claim 32 wherein said selective rotation means are
actuator driven
worms and mating worm gears for selective rotation of said shafts.
34. The active edger of claim 19 or 26 wherein said first chipping head
comprises V-shaped
chipping head knives mounted thereon.
35. The active edger of claim 19 or 26 further comprising an anvil cooperating
with said first
chipping head so as to direct said sawn edgings into said chipping head.
36. The active edger of claim 35 wherein said anvil further comprises a side
fence mounted
laterally outward on said anvil so as to register with said sawn edging
whereby said edging
is forced back into said feed line.
37. The active edger of claim 1, 8, 19 or 26 further comprising means for
cantilevering said
workpiece, once sawn into a sawn workpiece and said sawn edging, over a gap in
a
workpiece conveyor, said gap downstream of said active edger, said cantilever
means for
cantilevered supporting of only said sawn workpiece whereby said sawn edging
is
unsupported over said gap as said sawn workpiece is conveyed over said gap by
said
workpiece conveyor.
23

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SCANNING, OPTIMIZING AND EDGING A BOARD
WITH AN ACTIVE EDGER
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method and an apparatus for lineal or horizontal
scanning and edging of boards or flitches including skewed flitches, for
lumber, and in particular
relates to a board edging system, for the edging (rip sawing) of a board
according to an optimized
profile in an active edger having with saws and chippers so as to eliminate a
tailing device.
Background of the Invention
A board, or " flitch", by definition has first and second opposed cut planar
faces and
first and second opposed waned edges. In the prior art, flitches would be
scanned and sequenced
horizontally, positioned in the desired skew, if any, and then clamped by feed
rolls to be feed
linearly into a conventional edger. Alternatively, the flitches would be
symmetrically centered in
the direction of flow, fed through a linear scanner, and then, in the same
direction of flow, into an
edger capable of skewing and laterally translating. The first approach is
effective, but the system
is quite expensive and the positioning of the flitch can take up time. The
second approach, such as
2 0 is taught in US patent 4,599,929 to Dutina, works fine, but the system
does not take full advantage
of modern automatic controls and does not teach the requisite mechanics to do
so.
Different lineal scanning and positioning methods have been used. US patent
number 4,239,072, to Merilainen, discloses a lineal scanning and skew edging
process, but does
2 5 not allow for multiple saws. US patent number 4,449,SS7, to Makela,
discloses a similar process
to that of Merilainen '072, but lacks the ability to reduce the edgings to
chips, and also does not
allow for multiple saws.
1

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
US patent number 5,429,161 to Allard discloses a linear scanning resawing
process.
The apparatus positions the workpiece while the workpiece is moving by means
of two pair of
tandem, opposed top and bottom, clamp rollers that skew the workpiece as it is
translated for
resawing. This process relies on twisting the workpiece as it moves through
the roller clamps.
This causes skidding of the workpiece between the rollers as they are skewed.
The variance in
friction between different workpieces and the rollers and the difference in
the direction of the
rollers' axis and the direction of the workpiece as it travels through the
roller clamps, may cause a
margin of error that reduces the recovery percentage. It is well known in the
industry that roll feed
edgers are not that accurate.
Summary of the Invention
The method and apparatus for scanning, optimizing and edging a board with an
active edger, and control thereof, consists of, first, an unscrambler that
receives and separates the
1 S flitches from the mill. The unscrambler feeds the flitches onto an even
ending roll case having a
live fence. The ending rolls even-end the flitches against the live fence, and
then transfer the
flitches to a flitch sequencing transfer table, or, for timed release, on to a
variable speed lugged
transfer table. The transfer table gathers and advances the flitches. The
profiles of the flitches are
scanned at this point if using a transverse scanning system. The flitches are
advanced for timed
2 0 release, so as to queue the flitches for release onto a chain feed, or
other type of feed table, where
the flitches are roughly positioned to "zero far side" against a fence (also
known as a line bar).
The flitches are advanced, perpendicular to the flow of the transfer table,
straight towards the
active edger. The feed table feeds the flitches singly on to a wide
circulating belt, or belt
conveyor, separated only by the distance needed to queue up the next flitch on
to the roll case.
2 5 When using a lineal scanner, the belt conveyor moves the flitches through
the lineal scanner where
the scanner reads the profiles of the flitches and sends the data to a
decision processor system.
2

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
The advantage of "zero far side" positioning is to allow for the simplest
possible
positioning of a flitch on the feed table for feeding to the edger. This also
allows the correspond-
ing edger far side saw and/or chip head to remain in a localized area while
the opposite edger
saws) and chip head are adjusted to obtain the desired board width(s). This
reduces the tailing
solution needed behind the edger, thus reducing the complexity of the tailer
and the time needed to
make the adjustments of the tailer.
In the decision processor an optimizing algorithm generates a three
dimensional
model from the flitch's measurements and calculates the optimized edging
solution. Data is then
transmitted to a programmable logic controller (PLC) that in turn sends motion
control
information related to the optimum breakdown solution to the active edger,
which sets the start
position and controls the movement of the saws and chip heads using a motion
controller, which
may be position based.
The flitch moves from the scanner, along the belt conveyor, to a sharpehain
positioned just in front of the active edger. Overhead driven press rolls
above the sharpchain press
the flitch down against the top of the sharpchain as the flitch feeds straight
into the active edger.
The overhead pressrolls cooperate with the circulating sharpchain in the
infeed area of the active
edger to control the direction and accuracy of straight feeding. The active
edger feed area may
2 0 also have split bedrolls in the infeed area. Non-split bedrolls may be
provided in the outfeed area,
also having overhead pressrolls. The flitch is pressed down by the overhead
pressrolls onto the
lower infeed sharpchain and bedrolls as the flitch is fed straight into and
through the edger saws
and chip heads. The saws and chip heads actively follow the optimum path
unique to the flitch,
the saws reducing the flitch to boards, the chip heads reducing the edgings to
chips.
The sawing device rotates the guides and saws on an axis perpendicular to the
flow,
and simultaneously translates the guides and saws transversely to the flow to
accomplish active
cutting of a workpiece. The chip heads clean up the edgings.
3

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
The efficiency of lumber production from flitches, and in particular for
irregular or
crooked flitches, is improved by placing the flitch against a fence to the
"zero far side" of a
conveyor. The conveyor then moves the flitch through a lineal scanner, if not
already scanned on a
transverse scanner. The flitch is moved straight in the direction of flow
through the edger, where
the saws and chip heads skew and actively translate in unison to saw and chip
the flitch. Conical
chip heads can be mounted with a toe-in equal to the maximum skew of any given
flitch, which
allows the chip heads to remain substantially perpendicular to the direction
of flow as the chip
heads translate perpendicular to the flow along with the saws, which must skew
and translate to
cut the skewed flitch as desired. By attaching chip heads immediately behind
the saws and in the
saw feed line, and translating the chip heads along with the saws, the need to
handle the edgings
after they exit the edger is eliminated.
The efficiency of lumber production from flitches, and in particular for
irregular or
crooked flitches, is also improved by employing position-based motion controls
for use with the
active edger, which motion controls follow the cutting solution for each
flitch as determined by
both the optimizer from the scanned profile of the flitch and the desired
lumber prerequisites.
Controlling the saws through the guides, as set out in more detail below, by
cutting
2 0 a gentle curve along the profile of a given flitch, in certain situations
and given sawmill requisites,
allows for increased board length and thus increased recovery percentage. This
is achieved by
accurate control of the saws by means of the saw guiding system described
below and the position
based motion controls working in cooperation with the optimizer which can be
programmed to
recognize a situation where a gentle curve may improve recovery percentage.
By the edger saws skewing and translating, and the edger chip heads
translating in
unison with the saws, so as to traverse the skew of the flitch as the flitch
moves through the edger,
the flitch only moves through the edger straight, in the direction it was
scanned. The edger saws

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
and chip heads adjust for width and skew for starting position, and then
translate together actively,
to traverse the flitch by translating the saws and chip heads as the flitch
moves through the edger
so as to cut along the optimized path that has been determined by the
optimizer.
An infeed anvil may be positioned tightly adjacent the bottom of the chip
head(s),
The anvil directs the edgings into the chip heads) and prevents the edgings
from being deflected
down by the chip heads) rotational cutting forces. The chip heads) may be
conical or drum-like,
and may have compound angled knives that slice rather than chop the edgings,
thus producing
better quality chips. The infeed anvil and the chip heads may be positioned in
the saw feed line
and close to the rear, that is, the downstream end of the saw blades, and may
be attached to the
same positioner cylinders for simultaneous translation of the chip heads and
the saws. Outfeed
vertical faced anvils may also be placed behind the chip heads to counteract
any forces that the
opposing chip head may cause. An opposing roller may be provided, cushioned
and adjustable, so
as to inhibit the zero far side chip head forces from pushing the Hitch off
the feed line, when using
only one chip head on the far side.
In an alternate chipper disc configuration, V-shaped wing knives are provided
which prevent edging slivers from being forced between the chipping disc and
the board.
2 0 The chip heads are used to reduce the edgings of the flitch so that there
is no need
to handle the edgings behind the edger.
In summary, and not so as to exclude the above, the active edger in a first
embodiment of the present invention includes an actively positionable gangsaw
or a first end saw
2 5 mounted on an arbor mounted within a stationary saw box, wherein the
gangsaw or first end saw is
actively positionable relative to the saw box. In a second embodiment, the
gangsaw or first end
saw is mounted on an arbor in fixed translational and skewing relation
relative to, and within, an
actively positionable saw box. The actively positionable gangsaw is
selectively actively laterally
5

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
translatable and selectively actively rotatable so as to skew the gangsaw
relative to the saw box. In
both embodiments, the saw box receives a workpiece, longitudinally conveyed in
a downstream
direction, longitudinally into the gangsaw or first end saw from an upstream
position. A first
chipping head, mounted to a first side of the saw box adj acent and downstream
of the first end saw
or a first end saw in the gangsaw is, in the first embodiment, selectively
actively laterally
positionable so as to align with a first feed line corresponding to the first
end saw in unison with
active positioning of the gangsaw, relative to the workpiece. In both
embodiments, the first
chipping head actively corresponds, in a lateral chipping depth, to a lateral
edging dimension of a
sawn edging sawn from the workpiece. The sawn edging is chipped as the
workpiece is conveyed
from, once sawn by, the gangsaw, longitudinally past the first chipping head.
In one aspect of the present invention, the active edger further comprises a
second
actively laterally positionable chipping head mounted to a second side of the
saw box, where the
second side is opposite to the first side of the saw box. The second chipping
head may be
downstream of a second end saw mounted on the arbor in the saw box, and
actively laterally
positionable so as to actively align with a second feed line corresponding to
the second end saw,
and so as to actively laterally position in unison with the second end saw.
The second chipping
head may be adjacent the second end saw and mounted in generally opposed
facing relation to the
first chipping head, or may be staggered, relative to the first chipping head,
in a downstream
2 0 direction. Advantageously, in the first embodiment, the first and second
chipping heads are
aligned with toe-in relative to the alignment of the first and second end
saws.
In a further aspect of the invention the saws are positioned by positioning
saw
guides corresponding to saws on the gangsaw. The saw guides are selectively
rotatable about
2 5 corresponding generally vertical axes of rotation whereby rotating the
guides skews the saws. The
guides are positioned by selectively rotatable generally vertical shafts
corresponding to the guides,
and rigidly mounted thereto. Selective rotation means selectively rotate the
shafts about their
6

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
longitudinal axes to thereby rotate the guides and the saws. The selective
rotation means may be
actuator driven worms and mating worm gears for selective rotation of the
shafts.
The active edger of the present invention advantageously further includes
means for
cantilevering the workpiece over a gap in a workpiece conveyor. The gap is
downstream of the
active edger. The cantilever means is a means for cantilevered supporting of
the workpiece, but
not the sawn edging, whereby the sawn edging may fall into the gap as the
workpiece is conveyed
over the gap by the workpiece conveyor.
The invention provides other advantages which will be made clear in the
description of the preferred embodiments.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention will be better understood by reference to drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a plan view according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 is an enlarged partially cut away plan view of a portion of Figure 1.
Figure 3 is a plan view according to an alternative embodiment of the
invention,
showing one saw blade and staggered chip heads.
Figure 4 is a plan view according to a further alternative embodiment of the
2 5 invention, showing a translating and skewing saw box with two chip heads.
Figure 5 is a plan view according to a further alternative embodiment of the
invention, showing a translating and skewing saw box with one chip head.
7

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
Figure 6 is an elevation view according to the preferred embodiment of the
invention, taken along section line 6-6 in Figure 1.
Figure 7 is an elevation view according to an alternative embodiment of the
invention.
Figure 8 is an enlarged partially cut away view of a portion of Figure 6.
Figure 9 is a section view along line 9-9 in Figure 8, showing worm gears
within
the guide block.
Figure 10 is an elevation view of the simplified tailer.
Figure 11 is a plan view of the simplified tailer of Figure 10.
Figure 12 is a plan view of an alternative chip head.
2 0 Figure 12a is an elevation view of the alternative chip head of Figure 12.
Figure 13 is an enlarged partially cut away view of a portion of Figure 1 with
the feed table modified as an alternative embodiment.
Figure 14 is, in perspective view, a block schematic diagram showing the
relationship of the electronic devices.
8

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiment
Referring to the drawing figures wherein similar characters of reference
represent
corresponding parts in each view, or preferred embodiment of the active edges
apparatus is
generally indicated by the reference numeral 10 and is best seen in Figures 1,
2 and 6.
As illustrated in Figure 1, unscrambles 12 receives flitches 14 from the mill
in
direction A. Flitches 14 are separated by unscrambles 12 and then fed onto an
even ending roll
case 16 which ends the flitches onto live fence 16a. Flitches 14 are then
transferred on to a flitch
transfer table 18, or a dropout I 9. Dropout 19 allows the operator to reject
a flitch before it moves
on to transfer table 18. Transfer table 18 advances flitches 14 by the use of
duckers. Duckers are
rows of retractable stops which pivot on common shafts to insert stop arms
into the flow of
flitches. The duckers allow control, in a stop/start manner, of the flow of
flitches across the
transfer table. Thus on transfer table 18 the flitches transfer to ducker A20
which, when raised,
stop further movement of the flitch. When ducker B22 on transfer table 18
becomes available,
flitch 14 is sequenced from ducker A20 to ducker B22 where once again the
flitch may be stopped.
When ducker C24 on transfer table 18 becomes available, flitch 14 is sequenced
from ducker B22
to ducker C24. When ducker D26 on transfer table 18 becomes available, flitch
14 is sequenced
from ducker C24 to ducker D26. When ducker E28 on transfer table 18 becomes
available, flitch
2 0 14 is sequenced from ducker D26 to ducker E28.
In an alternative embodiment, a variable speed lugged transfer table with
lugged
transfer chains (not shown) may also be employed. Timing skids (not shown),
mounted near
dropout 19, would hold back the flow of flitches 14 for timed release on to
the lugged transfer
2 5 table.
Feed table 30 receives flitches, one at a time, 14 from ducker E28. Feed table
30
moves flitch 14 against fence 32. Once flitch 14 contacts fence 32, feed table
30 begins to
9

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
translate flitch 14 in direction B. Flitch 14 moves from feed table 30 and
fence 32, onto a wide
circulating belt 36, which continues to translate flitch 14 in direction B. A
driven overhead press
roll 34, mounted near the upstream end of belt 36, assist in accelerating
flitch 14 on to belt 36.
Flitch 14 translates on belt 36 through lineal profile scanner 38. Lineal
profile scanner 38 obtains
an image of flitch 14.
In an alternative embodiment an x-ray grade scanner 39 may be mounted
adjacent,
that is, in opposed relation above and below belt 36, upstream or downstream
of lineal profile
scanner 38. This X-ray grade scanner 39 may be of the type described in US
patent 4,879,752 to
Jan Aune. The incorporation of X-ray grade scanner 39 in this manner may
provide better
optimization of the breakdown of flitch 14.
As best seen in Figures 2 and 6, a plurality of driven pressrolls 40, each
actuated by
pressroll cylinders 40a, receive flitch 14 prior to flitch 14 entering active
edger 10. Pressrolls 40
press down to hold flitch 14 against the sharpchain 42, and onto split
bedrolls 44 if so provided.
Driven pressrolls 40 and sharpchain 42 drive flitch 14 in a straight line in
direction B into active
edger 10. Saws 46, 48 and 50, and chip heads 52 and 54 translate in direction
E as flitch 14 moves
through edger 10. Chip heads 52 and 54 are shown with toe-in of approximately
2.5 degrees.
Toe-in allows chip heads 52 and 54 to traverse flitch 14 without the need to
actively skew chip
2 0 heads. Active edger 10 includes saw guides 56, which contact both sides of
saws 46, 48 and 50 to
provide stability to the saws as flitch 14 passes through the active edger.
Within active edger 10, saws 46, 48 and 50 are rotated by, and are
translatable
on splined saw arbor 53. Saw blades 46, 48 and 50, via saw guides 56
translates saw blades
2 5 46, 48 and 50 in direction C and skew in direction D.
As best seen in Figures 8 and 9, saw guides 56 are attached to, and skewed, by
shaft
58, shown in dotted outline in Figure 8, within saw guide block 60. Saw guide
shaft 58 rotates

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
saw guides 56, thus skewing saw guides 56 and saws 46, 48 and 50 to the
correct angle, that is,
corresponding to the skewed Hitch 14. Worm gear 62 and corresponding worm 64
within saw
guide blocks 60, mate shaft 58 to shaft 66 so that rotation of shaft 66
rotates shaft 58. Spine or
keyway 66a allow worm 64 to slide on shaft 66, while rotating with shaft 66.
Shaft 66 is rotated
by TemposonicTM cylinder 67 (cylinder 67 may also be rotated by other means of
precise
controlled translation, such as stepper motors), through linkage 67a. Shaft 66
remotely actively
skews the array of saw guides 56 corresponding to saws 46, 48 and 50 to follow
the skew of flitch
14 as flitch 14 is translated through the saws. Saw guide blocks 60 are
translated laterally by
TemposonicTM cylinder shafts 70, 72 and 74 to first set saw spacing and then
to actively translate
saws 46, 48 and 50 with spacing set to the optimizer decision which
corresponds to the skew of
flitch 14, thereby allowing saws 46, 48 and 50 to actively traverse skewed
flitch 14, or to gently
curve edge flitch 14, as the case may be, (cylinder shafts 70, 72 and 74 may
also be translated by
other means of precise controlled translation, such as stepper motors).
In an alternate embodiment, as best seen in Figure 3, active edger 10 has only
one
saw 46 on arbor 53, and chip heads 52 and 54 are staggered. As flitch 14
enters active edger 10,
saw 46 and chip heads 52 and 54 translate into position in direction E, and
continue to actively
translate so as to follow the profile of flitch 14 as flitch 14 passes through
active edger 10. Saw 46
saws the far side of flitch 14. Chip head 52 then chips the sawn edging as
flitch 14 passes chip
2 0 head 52. Side cushioned roller 52b adjusts to confirm the position of
flitch 14. As flitch 14 passes
chip head 52, the far side edge 14a is steadied by anvil roller 52b, which
steadies flitch 14 as flitch
14 moves into chip head 54. Chip head 54 chips the near side edge 14b off
flitch 14. This
embodiment may be used in a single board solution, where only one board is
produced from flitch
14.
An alternative embodiment feed table 30 is shown in Figure 13. Feed table 30
is
used in conjunction with a transverse scanner (not shown), where flitch 14 is
scanned as flitch 14
moves across transfer table 18 to feed table 30. A plurality of positioner
cylinders 31 are provided
11
_ r~.. ..._,_...__...__

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
to replace fence 32. The number of positioner cylinders depends on the lengths
of flitches the
system can process. Positioner cylinders 31 are in line with transverse
scanner lasers (not shown)
mounted to the transverse scanner, spaced apart in equally spaced transverse
array, the transverse
scanner mounted for example transversely across the transfer table. Positioner
cylinders 31 may
be set to position flitch 14 so that minimal movement of saws in edger 10 are
needed. Positioner
cylinders may extend a little after flitch 14 has been placed on feed table
30, thereby insuring the
position of flitch 14 is known, even if the flitch has bounced. In this case,
positioner cylinders 31
are set back the anticipated distance corresponding to the desired bounce
correction, (flitch sizes
may vary the extension of positioner cylinders from one system to another).
Thus, flitch 14 may
be positioned on the desired feed line on feed table 30.
Positioner cylinders 31 may be simple air cylinders that stroke out to insure
that the
position of flitch 14 is known and accurate (as scanned). Alternatively,
positioner cylinders 31
may be Temposonic TM type cylinders, (or by other means of precise controlled
translation, such as
stepper motors). Temposonic TM type positioner cylinders 31 may be used to
straighten a skewed
flitch 14 to thereby reduce the need for edger 10 to skew. Temposonic''~M type
positioner cylinders
31 may be programmed to actively decelerate flitch 14, to thereby reduce edge
crush, which causes
a loss of recovery percentage, at the same time (i) allowing for increased
speed of flitch placement
on feed table 30 and, (ii) also thereby eliminating ditch bounce. LJse of
TemposonicTM cylinders
2 0 may allow the manufacture of a single type of active edger, independent of
the method of scanning
(transverse of lineal) employed. This reduces the number of types of edgers,
and thus reduces their
cost.
In further alternative embodiment, as best seen in Figure 4 and 7, active
edger 10
2 5 skews in direction D on pivot axis 76. Active edger 10 skews in direction
D and translates in
direction E to position saw 46 and chip head 52 to begin edging a skewed
flitch 14. The skew is
then fixed. Concurrently, the spacing of saws 48 and 50 is set. The near side
chip head 54 spacing
is set along with near side saw 50. Thereafter, the active translation of
active edger 10 in direction
12

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
E follows the optimum line to edge the board as Hitch 14 reaches saws 46, 48
and 50. Active
skewing of edger 10 may be required for sawing a gentle curve when edging of a
flitch if desired.
In another embodiment as best seen in Figure 5, active edger 10 skews in
direction
D on pivot axis 76. Active edger 10 skews in direction D and translates in
direction E, positioning
saw 46 and chip head 52 for edging the skew of flitch 14. The skew is fixed,
the saw spacing of
saws 48 and 50 set, and then only the translation of active edger 10 in
direction E occurs to follow
the optimum line to edge the board. The active skewing of edger 10 may be
needed for sawing a
gentle curve when edging of a flitch. In this embodiment only one chip head 52
is used and an
adjustable cushioned roller 54b on the near side 14b may be employed. Roller
54b helps ensure
the position of flitch 14, as flitch 14 is moved through edger 10 in direction
B. Out feed anvil 52d
may be provided where the far side edge 14a, which has just been sawn, further
assisting to
stabilize position of flitch 14 as it moves through edger 10.
Referring again to the embodiment seen in Figure 2, as flitch 14 moves through
edger 10, the edgings (not shown), to be formed by the cutting away of waned
edge slabs 14c and
14d by saws 46 and 50, are directed at chip heads 52 and 54 as the edgings
move along with flitch
14 in direction B. Infeed anvils 52a and 54a assist in reducing the edgings
created by saws 46 and
50 to chips, by directing edgings into chip heads 52 and 54. The chips created
fall away on to a
2 0 sawdust and chip conveyor (not shown). Driven pressrolls 40 continue
pressing flitch 14 on to bed
rolls 44 on the outfeed of edger 10. Pressrolls 40 are lifted, by actuation of
cylinders 40a, as the
trailing end of the flitch 14 passes through edger 10 onto outfeed belt 86. As
shown in Figure 12
and 12a, anvil 52a may include side fence 52b to redirect any loose edgings
back into chipping
head 52. Loose edgings may otherwise move off to the side, away from chipping
head 52.
2 5 Similarly, anvil 54 may include side fence 54b (not shown).
Figure 12 and 12a also illustrate an improved chip head 80 having V-shaped
wing
knives 82. V-shaped wing knives 82 direct the edgings into the mid portion of
chip head 80, to
13

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
prohibit slivers being forced between the chip head and sawn edge of flitch
14. The illustrated
angle 82a of V-shaped wing knives 82 is not to scale, although angle 82a
should have a defined
angle akin to the angle shown. The rest of the chip head may be a cone or drum-
like.
A simplified tailer 84 is seen in Figure 10 and 11. Tailer 84 works in
conjunction
with the above embodiments when only one chip head 52 is used on the far side
14a. Tailer 84
cooperates with edger outfeed belt 86. Edger outfeed belt 8G has an overhead
press roll 88
adjacent its downstream end, downstream in the direction of flow, direction B.
Pressroll 88 holds
flitch 14 (now a board, or boards) down on to belt 86. Roller 90 under belt 86
prevents the action
of overhead press roll 88 pressing on Hitch 14 from slowing outfeed belt 86.
Overhead press roll
88 cantilevers Hitch 14 over a gap 92. The near side edging of flitch 14 falls
through gap 92 onto a
conveyor (not shown). Because of the shape of the edgings and because that
they are not
supported by the overhead press roll 88, the edgings simply fall off to the
side of flitch 14.
Overhead press roll 88 may be adjustable in direction E depending on mill
requisites. Depending
on how long and how wide the boards coming out of the edger are, and what
their skew maximum
is, dictates whether there is a need for a side to side adjustment of overhead
press roll 88.
Secondary outfeed belt 94 cooperates with a secondary outfeed hold down means
such as pressroll
96. Secondary outfeed hold down 96 supports boards) as they are moving over
gap 92. Near side
fence 98 redirects boards) back into the direction of flow, direction B. Near
side fence 98 is
2 0 needed when the lengths of flitch 14, in combination with flitch 14 skew
maximums, cause
boards) to move off track. Secondary outfeed belt 94 can be an adjustable
belt, adjustable in
direction E or direction B if needed, again depending on mill requisites,
where lengths and skew
maximums require greater machine flexabilities.
2 5 As best seen in Figure 14, an optimizer decision processor 100 and the
scanner 38
communicate on a common scanner local area network 102. There is an ethernet
local area
network (LAN) 104 and a network server 106 for network communications, and a
modem 108 for
14

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
external communications. The man-machine interface 110 and primary workstation
112 also
communicate over the ethernet LAN 104.
The optimizer decision processor 100 and associated network server 106,
man-machine interface 110, programmable logic controller (PLC) 114 and primary
work station
112 communicate across a common ethernet LAN 104 which is available as a
connection point to
existing mill networks. This connection point allows workstations within the
existing mill offices
(with appropriate software) access to all flitch optimization functions. A
dedicated
communications link 116 may exist between the optimizer decision processor 100
and the
programmable logic controller (PLC) 114. All workstations and the network
server 106 contain
applications which provide mill personnel the tools they require to define
their environment
(scanner, optimizer, machine center, products, shift schedules, reports) to
the flitch optimizer
system; pre-generate various start-up configurations; start, stop and load the
system; visually
monitor the flitch 14 as it proceeds through the machine centers and monitor
the operation for
unusual conditions. The operators console 118 allows the operator to stop the
movement of
flitches 14 or divert a flitch through dropout 19.
Modem 108 attached to the network server 106 and the primary workstation 112
using remote access software and appropriate controls, allows remote dial-up
access to the mill
2 0 site for software reprogramming and remote operation of almost every
application and function as
well as retrieval of statistics and flitch summaries for oft=site service
analysis. The man-machine
interface 110 provides operator input and allows the operator access to
various levels of machine
operation and control. The PLC 114 and motion controllers 120, share the task
of monitoring
speed and position of the flitch 14 and controlling positioners. Encoders (not
shown) on belt 36,
2 5 provide tracking information relative to the movement of the flitch 14.
It is apparent then that variations and modifications of the invention can be
made
without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. Such variations might
include, zero near side

CA 02216582 2003-O1-20
positioning, which would essentially apply the same rules as "zero far side"
positioning, except the
action of the feeding table 30 would be slightly different than that depicted
herein. Such variations
and modifications are meant to be comprehended within the scope of the
invention.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing
disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of
this invention
without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. Accordingly, the scope of
the invention is to be
construed in accordance with the substance defined by the following claims.
16

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2017-09-24
Inactive: Office letter 2012-07-31
Inactive: Office letter 2012-07-31
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-07-31
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-07-31
Appointment of Agent Request 2012-07-16
Revocation of Agent Request 2012-07-16
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-09-22
Inactive: Office letter 2009-09-22
Inactive: Office letter 2009-09-22
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-09-22
Letter Sent 2009-09-14
Revocation of Agent Request 2009-07-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2009-07-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2009-01-13
Revocation of Agent Request 2009-01-13
Appointment of Agent Request 2009-01-13
Revocation of Agent Request 2009-01-13
Revocation of Agent Request 2008-10-10
Appointment of Agent Request 2008-10-10
Inactive: Office letter 2008-10-10
Appointment of Agent Request 2008-09-09
Revocation of Agent Request 2008-09-09
Appointment of Agent Request 2008-07-24
Revocation of Agent Request 2008-07-24
Letter Sent 2007-04-03
Letter Sent 2006-09-19
Letter Sent 2006-09-19
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Letter Sent 2005-10-18
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2005-09-06
Grant by Issuance 2003-11-25
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-11-24
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2003-09-08
Pre-grant 2003-08-22
Inactive: Final fee received 2003-08-22
Letter Sent 2003-08-20
Letter Sent 2003-03-11
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-03-11
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-03-11
Inactive: Received pages at allowance 2003-01-20
Letter Sent 2002-11-15
Inactive: Office letter 2002-11-15
Letter Sent 2002-11-15
Inactive: Office letter 2002-11-12
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2002-11-04
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2002-09-26
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-06-27
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-03-04
Letter Sent 2001-10-24
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-04-23
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2000-06-05
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2000-06-05
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2000-06-05
Letter Sent 1999-10-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1999-10-12
Letter Sent 1999-10-04
Letter Sent 1999-10-04
Inactive: Single transfer 1999-09-07
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-09-07
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-09-07
Request for Examination Received 1999-09-07
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-03-24
Inactive: Single transfer 1998-09-22
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 1998-09-22
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1997-12-16
Classification Modified 1997-12-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-12-16
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-12-03
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1997-12-03
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1997-12-02
Application Received - Regular National 1997-12-01

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-09-08

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 1997-09-24
Registration of a document 1998-09-22
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2001-09-24 1999-09-07
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1999-09-24 1999-09-07
Request for examination - standard 1999-09-07
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2000-09-25 1999-09-07
Registration of a document 1999-09-17
Registration of a document 2001-05-24
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2002-09-24 2002-07-15
Registration of a document 2002-09-26
Registration of a document 2003-07-17
Final fee - standard 2003-08-22
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2003-09-24 2003-09-08
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 2004-09-24 2003-12-30
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2005-09-26 2005-02-17
Registration of a document 2005-08-12
Registration of a document 2006-08-08
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2006-09-25 2006-08-17
Registration of a document 2007-02-14
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2007-09-24 2007-08-27
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2008-09-24 2008-09-24
Registration of a document 2009-07-17
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2009-09-24 2009-09-21
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2010-09-24 2010-09-07
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2011-09-26 2011-08-16
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard 2012-09-24 2012-08-08
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard 2013-09-24 2013-08-08
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - standard 2014-09-24 2014-09-04
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - standard 2015-09-24 2015-09-02
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - standard 2016-09-26 2016-09-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
USNR/KOCKUMS CANCAR COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
BRIAN T. STROUD
STEVEN W. MICHELL
WILLIAM R. NEWNES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-04-12 1 9
Claims 2003-01-20 7 300
Description 2003-01-20 16 781
Abstract 2003-01-20 1 37
Description 2003-01-20 16 781
Abstract 2003-01-20 1 37
Claims 2003-01-20 7 300
Representative drawing 2003-10-22 1 12
Cover Page 2003-10-22 1 50
Cover Page 1999-04-12 2 87
Drawings 1997-09-24 12 243
Abstract 1998-09-22 1 35
Description 1997-09-24 16 728
Claims 1997-09-24 7 275
Drawings 2002-06-27 12 329
Description 2002-06-27 16 787
Abstract 2002-06-27 1 37
Claims 2002-06-27 7 301
Filing Certificate (English) 1997-12-03 1 164
Request for evidence or missing transfer 1998-09-28 1 110
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-11-04 1 114
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1999-05-26 1 112
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1999-10-04 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-10-04 1 139
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2003-03-11 1 160
Correspondence 1997-12-09 1 33
Correspondence 1998-09-22 2 78
Correspondence 2002-11-12 1 23
Correspondence 2002-11-15 1 18
Correspondence 2003-01-20 25 1,153
Correspondence 2003-08-22 1 28
Fees 2003-09-08 1 30
Fees 2003-12-30 1 30
Fees 2002-07-15 1 36
Fees 1999-09-07 1 51
Fees 2005-02-17 1 31
Fees 2006-08-17 1 36
Fees 2007-08-27 1 38
Correspondence 2008-07-24 7 221
Correspondence 2008-10-10 1 15
Correspondence 2008-10-10 5 177
Correspondence 2008-09-09 5 175
Fees 2008-09-24 1 38
Correspondence 2009-01-13 5 191
Correspondence 2009-01-13 6 218
Correspondence 2009-07-17 10 366
Fees 2009-09-21 1 201
Correspondence 2009-09-22 1 14
Correspondence 2009-09-22 1 17
Fees 2011-08-16 1 39
Correspondence 2012-07-16 6 273
Correspondence 2012-07-31 1 14
Correspondence 2012-07-31 1 22