Language selection

Search

Patent 2230409 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2230409
(54) English Title: OPTICAL SIGNAL TRANSMITTER WITH MULTIPLE LIGHT SOURCE
(54) French Title: EMETTEUR DE SIGNAUX OPTIQUES A SOURCE DE LUMIERE MULTIPLE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G08G 1/095 (2006.01)
  • F21S 8/00 (2006.01)
  • F21V 5/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SILHENGST, FRANZ (Austria)
(73) Owners :
  • SWARCO FUTURIT VERKEHRSSIGNALSYSTEME GES.M.B.H.
(71) Applicants :
  • SWARCO FUTURIT VERKEHRSSIGNALSYSTEME GES.M.B.H. (Austria)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1998-02-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1998-08-24
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
97890031.4 (European Patent Office (EPO)) 1997-02-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


The optical signal transmitter contains a light source
composed of several individual lamps (2), mainly light-emitting
diodes, which is interchangeably connected to a power supply (7)
by means of a connector (6), whose light is focused as evenly as
possible by means of a shared condenser (3) and is radiated into
the prescribed area (XY) by means of a dispersion lens (4), which
is preferably composed of a number of identical single dispersion
lenses (5).


French Abstract

Émetteur de signaux optiques présentant une source de lumière constituée de plusieurs lampes particulières (2), surtout des diodes luminescentes, reliées de manière interchangeable par un connecteur (6) à une source d'alimentation électrique (7). Leur lumière est concentrée aussi régulièrement que possible au moyen d'un condensateur partagé (3) et émise dans le secteur voulu (XY) à travers une lentille de dispersion (4) constituée de préférence d'une série de lentilles de dispersion simples de même type (5).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. Signal transmitter lens system, especially for traffic
signal installation, consisting of a preferably two-part lens
system with a condenser (3) and a dispersion lens (4), as well as
light source at a fixed distance in the area of the optical
axis (8) of the system, consisting of a base plate (1) with
individual lamps (2), characterized by the fact that the light
source is composed of at least three individual lamps (2 ) which
are for the most part identical and for the most part radiate
their light (w) in the lens system where it is captured by a
shared condenser (3) and focused and then distributed by the
dispersion lens (4) according to the chosen specifications.
2. Signal transmitter lens system according to Claim 1,
characterized by the fact that the individual lamps (2) are
light-emitting diodes with a suitable radiation angle.
3. Signal transmitter lens system according to claim 1,
characterized by the fact that the individual lamps (2) are
formed through fiber-optic light guide ends (2a) with a suitable
radiation angle.
4. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 3, characterized by the fact that distance of
the light source and arrangement of the individual lamps (2 ) in
relation to the size of the optic are chosen so that the light
cone (w) being sent out of each individual lamp (2) illuminates
as much of the full surface of the condenser (3) in size and

direction as possible without any light being lost outside of the
condenser (3).
5. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 4, characterized by the fact that condenser
(3) and dispersion lens (4) are united in their optical effect
and are designed as a single part.
6. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 5, characterized by the fact that the
individual lamps (2) of the light source are arranged in block
form with maximum packing density.
7. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 5, characterized by the fact that the
individual lamps (2) are arranged at various and irregular
distances from one another.
8. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 7, characterized by the fact that the lowest
individual lamps (2) of the light source are found in the area of
the optical axis (8).
9. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 8, characterized by the fact that the
condenser (3) is built as a Fresnel lens .
10. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 9, characterized by the fact that the single
lenses of the condenser (3) demonstrate varying focal points
and/or freely defined surfaces whose geometry can be established
from a freely selected lack of focus of the optical projection.
11. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 10, characterized by the fact that the
condenser (3) is formed such that the light beam is as uniform in
each place in alignment and divergence (11).

13
12. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 11, characterized by the fact that the
desired light distribution (XY) is realized mainly by the
dispersion lens (4), whereby the dispersion lens is preferably
composed of the highest possible number of identical single
lenses (5), each of which produces the desired light distribution
(XY).
13. Signal transmitter lens system according to one or more
of Claims 1 through 12, characterized by the fact that the
individual lamps (2) demonstrate different forms, color
appearances and/or various radiation characteristics and,
preferably, can be switched on and off individually.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


B 2~3ul9,9J8~n3:03PM JONES & AS1~o22304o9 1998-02-24 NO 9151 p 3l~loo3
Co~e: 343-~0993
Re~.: 02058-003
Opt~cal si~nal 'c~an~mitter with multiple lig~t sour~e
The irl~ on c!oncerns a si~r~l tran~JniCter lens~ sy~tem,
especially fo~ tra~fic sigrlal~, consisti~g prefer~bly of a two-
piece lens syqtesn ~ith a conder~er lens ~nd a dispersion lens, as
well ~s a light :30urce at a f ixed in~erval ~ ~ the area of the
o~tical ~ of the ~y~tem, con~isting of a base pla~ ~rit~
ndividual lam~ e}e~nent~ .
e it has ~ecom~ pc~si~l~ to manuf~c~ure li~tht-e~nitti~
diodes ~ h stronger l~ght ~ea~s and intensity in -~ mul~itude of
~lors, the effort ha~ }~ee~ ma~e tO transfer to t~affic: l~ght
sig~a~s ~he a~vanta~es of h~-emittin~ diode~ as com~red to
th~ cn~ l y used ~ nde-scent lamE: s, ~uch a6 radiatior~ of a
direc:ted ligh~ bea~h, significan~ly lon~er life, and ~Tery
ef f icien~ energy relation~hips ln colored lighe, ~s well a~
reduced ~hos~ light ~the ~ ~sion of a ~raffic signal cha~ying
due to su~light falling on it) th~ough lo~s of ~ehe re~1ec~or. Fox
this purpose a smooth pla~e i~ ~et in ~he front of ~he ~is~al
~ha~~ in pla~e of the lens, the pl~tc~ l~sually bein~ desls~ned as
print~d c:ir~uit board and provided wi~ch an iIltegrated powe~
~upply. This plate i~i cove~d wi~ a sufficient nwnber of
indi~ridu~l light~ ing diodes in th~ d~pr~ ia.te c:olor
appearan~e, prefe~ably distri~ ed e~enly a~ross ~che sur~ace. ~
is u~3u~lly pro~cected f~om wea~er ~y a rran-~paren~ ~ove~lng p~ne
~et in fx~or~ o~ it, ~rhic~h often also has cG.~ md lenses to
pro~uce the de~ir~3d di~ribut~on of ~i~ht.
q~here are ~l~o de~ in which li~he-emi~ing diode~ aLe
densely placed directl~ on ~ carrier pl~te wl~ is optimally

02~2~FEB 23V~1993 3:03PM JONES & AS~cFw0223o4o9 1998-02-24 NO. 9151 P. 4~~~4
black, ~nd ~heir connec~ions are cold~red in :~ suit,able p~in~ed
circuit boa~ lying behi~d it.
Also Co~mnon are designs in ~hioh the s~l~face is ~ot everlly
cove~ed, bUt rathe~ certain s~bols such as ~rrohr~; o~ pedes~risn
f iS3ures are d~ layed ~hro~lgh a~propria~ely ordered Iigh~-
emi~ting dio~les.
Bu~ there a~e also de~i~ns ir~ which the end~ C~f f ib~r-optic
light s~uides of a f iber~optic ligh~ ide b~ a~ce the place o~
the light-emit~ing diode~ ese have a ~3imilar light
di~rib~tion, BO othe~ de~ o~ms ~fhi~:h ~re ~asica~ly ~he sanle
a~e po~si~le. S~ch cons~l~uc~ions a~e de~i~ned mainly to redu~e
ghost light ~nd ~o display sy~ols. T~e design in ~iber-c~p~ic
light guide eechnology allow~ the conventional l~mp ~o ~e
po~i~ioned outside o~ the signal charn~er, in a pla~e which allows
eas~r mairl~e.~ e ~cess.
~ oweve~, che ad~r~ntage~ di~cussed a~ove m~ls~ ~e cont~ted
wi~h sev~al disa~ nt~ge~. whioh is ~hy signal ~a~smittex~ of
th~ lesign type have not yec be~ome con~non.
On the one ~and, ~ considera~le nu~ r of lig~t-en it~cing
diodes is necessa~y ~o a~:hie-re a light in~ensity comp~ble to
~cha~. of i ~nn~le~3cent lamps . Light-emitting ~iiode op~ic~;, in
installatlon, are significantl~ more expensive, cheap~ only i~
oper~lon and maintenance than ~}~,e usual opti~s, Fiber-opti~
3.ight suide te~hnology is also expensive in ins~-al la~on;
maintenarlce costs are dePend~t orl ~he placement of the
in~n~4eCCent 1a~PP9.
On ~he other hand, the appearance req~lires getting used ~o,
b~cause the usu~l op~ics whic:h gl~re che well-known, r~31ativ~1y
even radia~ion now is divided i~to dozens or hund~ed~ of single,
intensely gl~win5~ ligh~ Sp~tl;.

FEB 23. 1998 3:04PM JONES & ASKEW NO. 9151 P 54~~~5
~2/Z~f~ . .~................. CA 02230409 1998-02-24
F'u~'cher, in o~der to achie~re ~he ~es~ elect~ical
connection~ eve~l light-emitting diodes are elec~tricall5r
~onnec ~ed in serie~ . Such groups are then o~erated in paralle~ in
sufficient nu~ers. ~his has the resul~ th~t i~ a single light-
em. t~ing di~e ~oe~ ou~, ~he en~ire g~oup in~nediatel~ fails,
whi~ gr~atly af~ects ~he ~pe~ra~ce. Buc i~ is nc~ ~orthwhile
exchanging the en~ire in~tallation due to a single f~iled light-
e~nitting diodç.
~ n fiber-optic li~ht gui~le ~echs~ology, individual light
s~ots can also be extin~uished due to a bre~lc in the fi~er-oPti~
l~ht ~uide .
Further, it i~ technl~ally diffi~ul~ to a~a~ge ~ he
light-emitt~ng diodes evenly in the direction of ~heir be~n~. So
individ~l light-~it~cing diodes ~f ten appea~ strong, o'chers
~eak, when ~riewed fxom the ~ide, whi eh also affe~ts the overall
appearan~e ~cn addieioTl, a p~oce~s ~lerance in ~he fiber-op~i~
light gllide design also r~ lts in an uneven liS~h~ dist~ u~cion
when vif~wed f~om ~he side.
In addition, fur~her technical develnpmen~s can be ex~ected
i~ which ~he intensity of ~che light-emit~ing aiodes ~ont;n-~lly
in~reases. ln thie: case fewer and fewer of them are requi~ed, so
~he sign~l surface ~ill be composed of fewer light spoes, placed
farther ~rom one an~he~ This una~t~acti~e and ~mpractical
~rr~ nce ~ot~ld 'chen ~a~e to be neu~rali~ed by supplernentary
op tic~l measure~ .
A fur~her di~ad~Tentage i~ e ~ual circular syn~et~y of the
light be~h of ~h~ indi~idual larnps, ~hic:h lead~ to a lar~e par~
of ~he light }~eing un~sed and ~ irg in irrelev~t area~.
~ urther, ~s~omar~f light-emitting diode:s ha~,re a
p:cedete~nilled xadia'cion cha~acteris~cic which us~lally does no~

FEE. ~3. 199~ 3:04PM JONES & ASKFW NO 9151 p 6~OOB02~23/98 ~U~ lJ;~ rA~ CA 02230409 1998-02-24
~ coincide with t~e specified lig~t distribution of the si~n~l
transmitter. Often d~sp~40~tionately mo~e pieces must be
utilized, only to have sufficient light in the badl~ reas.
Also, in a fibe~-o~tic li~ht guide, the ligbt di~tri~tion which
exa~tly fits the re~Uire~entS CannOt ~e achie~d, or~~an only be
achie~ed with di~rapo~tion~e e~fo~t.
Finally, ehe light-emitt~ng A~o~Cs ~hemselveg con~nuall~
demonserate a hi~er ~host light because they haye i~crea~ing
mixro~ed internal s~rfaces in order to increase the lig~ output.
In cu~xentl~ known ~e~igns, Gunlight ~alls dire~ nto the
~i~ht-e~i~tin~ diodes and there~y p~od~ce~ g~ost light in them
~ he ~oal o~ the in~ention is to retain ~he ad~antages of
li~ht-emittin~ diode~, e~pecially the limited electricity
~ons~mption and long life, bu~ ~o avoid the ~isadvan~es. ~t
would ~l~o b~ ad~antageous for economic reasons if ~e~er lighC-
~mitting diodes could be used to produ~e the same light effect.
~urther, the ~yste~ should be compa~ible wit~ design forms in
fiber-optic technolo~y.
In t~e in~entio~. ~hi~ is a~hie~ed by arranging th~
ind~idual lamps in3ide the signal c~h~r and thereby forming a
more or le~s fl~ ~;n~nt in placG~ he ;n~n~lp-~3cent l~mps
comInon ~lp un~cil now, which wo~ld al~c~ gi~re ou'c a light direc~l~
orien~ed to the dl~pe~sion lerl:3 even wl~h~ue ~ r~flec~or, ~nd
w~lo~e for~ ~nd siz~:, as well ~s the ~pecified lenc syste~n,
de~ermi~e~ the radiation charac~eristic o~ light distrib~tion.
ln the diagram, She ~ect of the in~ention i~ further
el~ri~ied ~hro~g~ ~he u~e of schematic illustrations. Figure 1
shows the general ~y~tem comp~nents in bas~c order, Fi~ure 2
shows a variation o$ the ligh~ ~our~ in fiber-op~ic ~echnology,

FEB 23. 1998 3:04PM JONES & AS~cFAw0223o4og 1998-02-24 NO 9151 P. 7 ~007
and Figu~e 3 ill~s~rates a cross-section of a sys~e~ wi~h light
radiat~ng in se~eral dire~ti~ns.
The prima~y funetioPal ~inciple i5 explained by Figure 1.
~a~ plate 1, prefera~ly designed as a printed circ~it board an~
more or less ~ompactly covered wieh individual l~mp~ 2, sends t~e
light onto ~ condenser ~, ~hi~h i~ ~es~- de~i~ned a~ a ~re~n~l
lens, ~hiçh ~em~n~tra~e~ for the most par~ the dimen~ions o~ the
dispersion lens and d~rects the l~ght ln a known way as parallel
as possible or ~olle~s the light in another advantageou~ way.
The disper~ion le~s 4 ~hen pro~ides ~or ~he disper~ion ~f the
li~h~ and ~e d~fiired ligh~ distribution in ~he us~al way ~y
m~ans o~ a ~ultitude of single l~n5e 5.
Ba~e plate 1, indi~idual lampa 2 and condense~ 3 ~hereby
replace the sy~tem with ~ncAn~escent lamp~ ~nd ~eflecto~s u~ed up
until no~. ~ase plate 1 sits p~eferably in a connector 6, which
us~ally connects it with po~er ~pply 7 ~o ~hae they can be
easily and che~ply exchan~ed in case of def~c~.
Ind~vidual l~mps 2 radiate the~r li~ht pxefe~bly within an
angle w ~uch ~hat as much as possible can be collected ~y
conden~er 3. In this way li~ht portion~ of ea~ individual llg~t
ele~en~ axe available in almost every area of co~n~ 3 and are
~iGper~e~ by the single len~es 5 of the disper~ion len~ 4 in the
s~ipulated are~ X~. So a parti~lax amount of light from each
individual l~m~ e~eived in each dlre~ ,. and to the
obser~rer each lig~t element 2 appears in a n~T~er o~ single
len~e. 5. Through l~yering of ~11 individual lam~s 2 in the
single le~ses 5, ~ecogni~ion o~ an individual light el~men~ i~ no
longer possi~le, and the appe~ance of the o~tic lens s~ste~ is
uniform as befoxe.

FEB.23.1998 3:05PM ~ONES ~ ASKFW NO 9151 P. 8 ~~~~
OY/~ h ~U~ lJ:lo rAA CA 02230409 1998-02-24
~ }~ou~h the S~t~lk ef~e~t, the loss of an indi-~idu~1 lamp, or
a ~roup o~ them, is not ~ ediately ~e~ognizable; only the
averall ligh~ intensity is p~opor~ionately lessened.
In addition, fo~ the same rea~on, a diver0ent optical
arrangemen~ of a single individ~al lamp 2 i~ no~ rec~gniz~ble,
Finally, ~he nu~ber of indi~idu~l lamps 2 place~ on the b~se
plate 1 ~ill n~t affect t~e appe~rance, because ~he~ ~e no
longer individua-l~ re~o~nizable. rrhis desi~n ~o~m i~ therefo~e
adap~able wi~ho~t difficult~ for future developmen~ with ~ewer
but ~righee~ lndividual lanlp8.
A good con~ig~ration of t~e c~n~e~er 3 exi~t~ when s~e
light beam 11, which ~rises betwe~n c:onden~er 3 ~nd disper~sion
lens 4, i~ e~ual a~ every point on condense~ 3, in ~erm~ of i~$
orienta~ion, intenSity and ligh~ dive~gence. This ~e~hod c~eates
fo~ the observer an evenly glowing ~ront lens o~erall.
An economical design ~ossibili~y e~is~s whe~ co~n-~er ~
foc~ses the li~ht exac~ly ~s in usual ~eflectors. In ~his case,
the same di~pe~ lense~ ~ ~a~ be utiliz~d, w~ich ~e~erally are
already constructed ~or ~he speclfied li~ht distribution.
~ fu~her desi~n possibility ~xi~ts ~hen one vaxies the
dis~ance o~ the i~divid~al lamps 2 ~o ~he ~ase plate 1 and the
conden~er 3~ One p~ticular di~tance maY prove to ~e optim~m,
dependi~ on the ~ize and covering of base pla~e 1. Dispex~ion
le~ 4 a~d conden~e~ 3 ~ust be de~enmined according to
specifica~ions.
ln ~ fur~her de~ign, individ~al lamps ~ ~re arranged with
one another in ~u~h a ~ay thaC each indi~idual li~ht cone ~
illu~inate~ the condenser 3 as preei~ely and fully ~ po~ le.
This can be a~hieved through til~ih~ or be~iny ~he ~asç pla~e

FEB.23.1998 3:05PM JONES ~ AS~W NO.9151 P. 9 ~009
02~2~ Uh lJ~ AA CA 02230409 1998-02-24
accordingly. In thi~ ~Ya~ each ligh~ element c~n ~ ll~ninate the
entire co~enRer ~ux~a~e withou~ significan~ loss.
A ~llr~-~er design possi~llity exi~ts when base ~lace 1 i
va~ied ~ith individual lam~s 2 in their size, ~?osition ~nd ~orm,
as well as ln the den6i~y of th~ indi~ridual lamps.
If, ~or example, base plat~ 1 is doubled ir~ siz~ but the
density on ehe le~ ~P~ .s the same, ~he result i~ a
co~respQnd;t~s~ly iIlc~eased liç~t distri~l~io~ XY of thq signal, i~
aecc~dan~:e w~ th t~e laws o~ optics . Because ~he len~ ~ystems,
light di~t~lb~l~ion and i~r~nge~ t of the i~divi~ual lamps a~e
. related ~ one anotheF in ac~:ordar~c~ wi~ ~he laws of op~ics, one
can zlchie~e ~he r~ecessary lig~t dist~ibutio~ al~o throus~
apE?ropriate ir~eyular arrarlge~nent of individual la~ o~ the base
plate wi~hou~ changing the opti~a~ c:o~npo~ents. I~ this way a
sys~em c:an be se~c up wh~ ch req~ es only on~3 single cor~n~er 3
and a di~ersion lens 4. ~l~rious light dis~ utions ~d
brightne~es are then achie~ed ~hrotlgh dif feren~ ar~angements o~
the individ~ 2 o~ ~he ~ase plate 1.
A f~ h~r de~ign po~ ility ari~e f~om the conbinat~ons o~
desi~n forms. Li~ht distri~u~io~ is achi~ved thro~lg~ the effe~:~
of the dispersion le~ 4, thR ~o~denser 3, and the aP4~Lop~iat~
dis~rib~ltion ~nd a~raIlgemen~ of individual 1amp5 2 on th~ bas~
plate ~ a!3 well as thei~ ~is~e~ce ~o the len~ system .
The rep~esentatio~ o~i ~ymbols caI~ ~Q a~ie~ed through
~emx~ e~, pain~ g t~e di~trib~lt~on lens, etc.
Figure ~ . hows a ligh~ source whose in~ividual lamp~ ~L nre
formed b~ ends of a fibe~-op~ic ~ighs guide ~ e same op~ic c~n
~e ll~ed by utilizi~g ~he ~ame çreome~ry in constnlction.
Figu$es 1 and 3 show the beam p~th of a fa~rorable deEiign
~m. The co~non light-emitting diode~3, like fiber-op~cic light

02/2?~ 30l993:l3 05PM ~ONES & ASKcFAw0223o4og 1998-02-24 NO 9151 P 10alO10
g~ides the~selves, ~adiate their l~ht a~ an angle ~ t~rhich is
ci rcularly symmetrical, with t~e highe~t ligh'c intensity A t ~e
c~enter. Ho~7e~rex, t}~ specified ligh~ ~adiation of ~raf~i~ signals
ranges from th~ horizontal, ~i~h the highest sI?ecified li~ht
in~ensi ~y, to pointinç~ dias~onally dow~ rds, ir~ a¢co~danc:e with
area XY. ~ 1~ g~t e~niS~ing diode placed dixectly in th2 front disX
therefore be ali~ned rela~i~rely ~lorizon~ally. In ~hi~ case,
the u~pe:r hal~ of the radia~ed li~ht is ~ availabl~ for the
signal light. In the system illu~trated, howe~er, the entire
amo~t o~ ht of liyht element 2 is utilized, bec~use ~he
requi~ed li~ht di~cri~tion results ~rom the 5ingl~ s 5 of
dispersiorl lens g~, which in the right placemen~ deflec:t~ ~he
~ ht such tha~ it i~ ~ire~ed only horizonc~lly or ~lownwards.
'rhis is economically a~lvantageou~, as significantly ~ewer
ir~dividual lamps c~n be used for ~he ~ne amount o f ligh~ in ~he
is~n~l lis~ht .
~ ecause the si~nal tr~nsmitter cannot send arly lig~
upwards, by th~ ~me to~en, n~ sunli~ 10 ~an fall on ~he
ind~idual l~p-~ 2, 50 this cannot produce any gho~t lig~t.
Be~ause no fl~rther re~ ti~e ~urf~ces ~re present, ~he
a~range~ent ~s an e~pe~ially good one for ~re~ ing ~he
occurrence of gh~t light.
The exa~ ~dapt~tion of ~he light dis~ribution to the
specifications by means of a dispersisn len~ 4 a~lows at ~east a
fur~he~ redu~eion of the xequired ~um~er o~ individu~l lamps The
los~ of light ~aus~d by the interfa~e of the front optic i~ ~ar
ex~eeded khrough these two conserva~io~ me~hod~.
I~ ~ further de~ign form ~s illu~tra~ed i~ Figure 3, the
base pla~e 1 is p~sitioned ~ith lndividual la~ps 2 in ~h ~ way
that t~e lowest row o~ the indivi~ual la~ps is at ~he height of

02~23/a8 r~UI~ lJ~ ~ JONES & ASKCFAw0223o4o9 1998-02-24 NO 9151 P 1l~0
~he optical aXiS ~. A~co~ding ~o ~p~ie~l laws, ap~?rop~iate
¢onstruction of ~he lens :3yste~n re$ults in l~gh~ distri~u~ion xY,
~rhich beçlins to e~ nd downward o~ the optlcal axis. This
~avor~ble ll~ht dis~ribution is achie~e~ :by means of condenser 3
alone, and preven~s loss of light upward~ d simultas~ usly
reduces the potential ~Or ghost: light.
Suc:h a desi~ll is alYo y40~1 for tightly grouped signal
treansmi~cters, such as railroad ~ ls. With a fixed ~ocu~ on
d~n~er 3 and without dispersion lens 5 [sic; 4~, th~
indi~rid~al lan~ps ~rr~eAr as~ain a~ single gl~wing points or as
l ight rayC in the ~ur~lm~ nsrS . If the ob~erver i~ direc~ly
be~-ween !3uch lis~ht ra~s, ~he xignal app~ars d~rk. Thi~ effe~t can
~e countered in that ~he corl~Pn~er ~ i~ provided wlth several
approp~iate foc~l ~Oir~ts or wi~ch a c~n~ing fo~ns so that no
shar~ image of ~he indl~ridual l~np~3 ean occu~. Further
possibilities are defo~using, or a m; n~ l disx~ersil~n through the
di~3pe~sio~ ~ ens 4 ~o that the light spotc are only ~isperse~ so
far t~at they still o~rerlap w~th adiaoent li~h~ s~ots enous~h that
the losr- o~ si~gle ~ndivid~al lamps lea~res no la~e da~k zon~s
visible .
~ further po~sible design of the in~rention consis~s in
co~ering the }:~ase pla~e with various indi~ dual lamps whi~h ~n
be ~ur~ed on ~t di~feren~ me~. So fo~ example red, yello~ ~d
gxeen light-emit~ing diodes ~an be mixed ~nd pla~ed ~ogether o~
b~e plate 1 and the si~al can ~hen selectively r~Ld~te red,
yellow or gxeen 3.i~ht, as well ~ ixed colors thro~g~
simul~aneous use of ~e~eral type~ of i~dividual la~nps~
A further po:3~ible design of t~Q ir~ventioIl consiC~ in
urlifyln~ the construc:~ion o~ co~ cer 3 and disper~ion leL6 4 by

CA 02230409 1998-02-24
FEB 23. 1998 3:06PM JONES & ASKEW NO. 9151 P. 12~~l2
02/2v~o ~vl- ~v:~v ....~
:LO
l~yering both lens 6ys te~n~ so ~ha~ only one ~ron~ di~k ~rit}~
corre~i~oIld:in~ly complex lenses ~ s ne~e~ary.
. ~: . ''
- '
-- '
- . .
.
':' i . '

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2001-02-26
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-02-26
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-02-24
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1998-08-24
Classification Modified 1998-06-03
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-06-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-06-03
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 1998-05-19
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-05-13
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1998-05-13
Application Received - Regular National 1998-05-12

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-02-24

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 1998-02-24
Application fee - standard 1998-02-24
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SWARCO FUTURIT VERKEHRSSIGNALSYSTEME GES.M.B.H.
Past Owners on Record
FRANZ SILHENGST
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1998-09-04 1 47
Abstract 1998-02-24 1 17
Description 1998-02-24 10 381
Claims 1998-02-24 3 106
Drawings 1998-02-24 1 32
Description 1998-05-19 10 443
Drawings 1998-05-19 1 31
Claims 1998-05-19 3 113
Abstract 1998-05-19 1 30
Representative drawing 1998-09-04 1 14
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-05-13 1 117
Filing Certificate (English) 1998-05-13 1 163
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1999-10-26 1 111
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2000-03-23 1 183
Correspondence 1998-05-19 14 595
Correspondence 1998-05-12 2 64