Language selection

Search

Patent 2236204 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2236204
(54) English Title: COATED ADSORBENT FIBERS
(54) French Title: FIBRES ADSORBANTES ENROBEES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01J 20/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ECONOMY, JAMES (United States of America)
  • DALEY, MICHAEL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
  • RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT OFFICE
(71) Applicants :
  • THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS (United States of America)
  • RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT OFFICE (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1996-05-09
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1996-12-05
Examination requested: 1999-01-20
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1996/006561
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1996038232
(85) National Entry: 1997-11-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/456,197 (United States of America) 1995-05-31

Abstracts

English Abstract


Fiber material for adsorbing contaminants is prepared according to the steps
of preparing coating a fiber substrate with a resin, cross-linking the resin,
heating the etchant and resin to carbonize the resin, and exposing the coated
fiber substrate to an etchant to activate the resin.


French Abstract

Fibres destinées à adsorber les contaminants, dont le mode de préparation consiste à appliquer un revêtement de résine sur un substrat de fibres, à réticuler la résine, à chauffer le produit d'attaque et la résine de façon à carboniser la résine, et à exposer le substrat de fibres enrobé à un produit d'attaque pour activer la résine.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A method of making a fiber material for adsorption of contaminants,
comprising the steps of:
coating a fibre substrate with a resin;
cross-linking the resin;
heating the etchant and coated fiber substrate to carbonize the resin; and, exposing the
coated fiber substrate to an etchant to activate the resin.
2. The process of Claim 1, wherein the etchant is selected from the group
consisting of oxidants, ammonia, nitrogen/hydrogen mixtures, and inert gases.
3. The process of Claim 2, wherein the etchant is an oxidant selected from the
group consisting of oxygen, air, carbon dioxide, steam, mixtures of sulfuric and nitric acid,
and mixtures of hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid.
4. The process of Claim 1, wherein the resin is selected from the group
consisting of phenolic resins and low viscosity pitch.
5. The process of Claim 4, wherein the resin is a phenolic resin selected from the
group consisting of novolacs and resols.
5. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is selected from the group
consisting of glass fiber substrates and mineral fiber substrates.
6. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is woven.
7. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is nonwoven.
8. The process of Claim 1, wherein the resin is mixed with a cross-linking agent
prior to coating the fiber.
9. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is coated with the resin by
dip coating.
10. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is coated with the resin by
spraying.
14

11. The process of Claim 1, wherein the fiber substrate is coated with the resin by
vacuum impregnation.
12. The process of Claim 8, wherein the cross-linking agent is selected from thegroup consisting of hexamethylenetetramine, resols, and mixtures of hydrochloric acid with
formaldehyde.
13. The process of Claim 1, wherein a fine, particulate, soluble inorganic material
is added to the resin.
14. The process of Claim 1, wherein a polymer that degrades at a temperature
lower than the degradation temperature for the resin is added to the resin.
15. The process of Claim 1, wherein catalytic metals are added to the resin.
16. The process of Claim 1, wherein the resin and cross-linking agent are mixed
with a solvent.
17. The process of Claim 1, wherein the resin is supplied in the form of a low
viscosity melt.
18. A coated fiber substrate for adsorbing contaminants made according to the
process of Claim 1.
19. A coated fiber substrate for adsorbing contaminants made accordingly to the
process of Claim 14.
20. A coated fiber substrate for adsorbing contaminants made according to the
process of Claim 15.
21. A coated fiber substrate for adsorbing contaminants made according to the
process of Claim 16.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96/38232 PCT/US96/06~61
S COATFn AnSORRFl~T FIBF.l~S
I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the use of certain activated m~t~ri~lx to absorb
noxious substances in gaseous and liquid waste streams.
II. Government Rights
This invention was made with Governm.ont support under awarded Contract DMR-
9208545 by the National Science Foundation. The Government has certain rights in this
mventlon.
III. Background of the Invention
Concern for the environment has caused governm~nt, science and industry to seek out
new solutions for removing toxic and noxious m~teri~lx ("co.~ tx") from air and water,
and especially from waste streams. In particular, cont~min~tion of air with pollutants such as
C10 (which depletes the ozone layer), CO2, NOX, SOx, CO, CH4, and loc~li7.e~1 O3 has
become a problem near industrial sites, in large urban centers, and in areas down wind of
such places, where pollutants are carried by weather patterns and returned to earth as, for
example, acid rain. Water pollution, including soil and groundwater co~ tion, also
presents a serious environmental ha_ard.
Science has advanced in its ability to detect increasingly small quantities of
c~ ntx Thus, we now are able to detect the adverse consequences resulting from the
presence of even minute quantities of certain such co~ x For example, small
amounts of cont~min~nt.~ such as PCBs and dioxin are known to cause adverse health effects
in ~nim~lx and in humans. Other cont~min~ntx, such as CO2 and methane, have been held
responsible for global warming. Still other co.lt~ x, like CO, are of concern to people
in their homes, as well as more generally, because CO is present in the emission streams of
automobiles and cigarettes. And chlorofluorocarbons, used as refrigerants and in the
production of certain types of foams, have been found partly responsible for depleting the
ozone layer that protects the earth and its inhabitants from the effects of ultraviolet radiation.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96138232 PCT/US96/06561
Governm~nt regulation of c~ emission has resulted in m~n~l~tes for the
virlual elimin~tion of certain co.~ .llx, and in limitations upon the emission of other
co..l~...il.:l..l~, in order to protect the environment in general, and human health in particular.
For example, int~rn~tional accords have been reached to m~ntl~te the elimin~tion of
chlorofluorocarbons from industry because of their adverse effects on the environment and, in
10 turn, human health.
Science and industry, too, have proposed solutions to the problems posed by
cont~min~nt~, in order to permit valuable technologies to be utilized despite the generation of
co.~t~"il~nt~ by those technologies. Where the col~ ,lL~ are present in waste streams,
these solutions principally are directed to the creation of mech~ni~m~ to remove the
15 cont~min~nt~. These mech~ni~m~ include devices such as scrubbers, filters, and other
mechanical and chemical systems for removing cont~min~nt~ from waste streams. Such
devices have been responsible for great decreases in the level of cont~min~nt~ found in waste
streams. Such devices may not, however, be cost effective to limit the amount of a noxious
substance found in a particular waste stream. Indeed, the utility of such devices depends
20 upon the particular co~ n~in~ involved, the amount of such material present in the waste
stream, the acceptable level of such materials in the environment (which frequently is
determined by governm~nt regulation), and the costs and benefits achieved from the various
options available to ~limini~h the quantity of col ~1~l " i ~ to acceptable levels while still
permitting the commercial utilization of the underlying technology responsible for the waste
25 stream.
Such solutions have not, however, been as effective as needed to remove minute
quantities of cont~min~nt.~. Typically, activated carbon granules (produced from organic
precursors such as coal, wood, almond shells, coconut shells, etc.) or fibers (produced from
organic and synthetic fiber precursors) have been employed to create sites where such
30 substances can be absorbed as a waste stream passes through a filter made from such
activated carbon materials. Such activated carbon materials are frequently produced from

CA 02236204 l997-ll-26
W O9.'3Q~2 PCTrUS96/06S61
S synthetic fibers of m~t~ri~lc such as phenolic resins, such as resols and novolacs, which are
treated with supe.rhe~ted CO2 or steam to carbonize and activate the m~teri~l and to increase
the surface area of the m~teri~l by creating pores in the m~tPriQl~.
Activated carbon m~tPri~l~ t.,vpically have been most effective in removing undesired
substances having a pH above 7.0, because the activation process in carbon tends to create
10 sites that are slightly acidic (pH < 7.0). Thus, activated carbon materials have not been
particularly effective in removing such hnpolL~ll, acidic pollutants as NOX and SOx.
However, a variety of chemical tre~tmPnt~ of such fibers have been proposed to create
dirrel~ tPcl sllrf~ces capable of absorbing many dirrel~ co,ll;~ nt~.
The processes for producing activated carbon fibers also have been limited as a result
15 of the extreme weight losses realized in the production of such fibers. Weight loss is an
hllpol l~ t limitation on the cost-effectiveness of such fibers because it correlates inversely
with the amount of col-~...in~.L that can be absorbed upon the surface of the fiber. The
technique of carbonizing the synthetic precursors to such fibers also produces materials that
are brittle or frangible, limiting their utility to systems in which some type of structural
20 support or co..~ ....Pnt for such fibers is permitted. This tends to increase the cost of using
the activated carbon fibers. Moreover, conventional activated carbon fibers exhibit poor
mechanical plupcllies, and are unavailable or ~A~nsive to produce in forms such as woven
fabrics, felts, or papers.
IV. Summar~ of the Invention
The present invention provides a fiber material for absorbing col.l;1.. i.. ~.,L~ that
overcomes the problems described above, and that offers greater flexibility in applications.
The fiber m~teri~l can be made by coating a fiber substrate with a resin, cross-linking the
resin, heating the etchant and resin to carbonize the resin, and exposing the coated fiber
substrate to an etchant to activate the resin.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96/38232 PCI/US96/06561
S Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide a method of making an adsorbent
material suitable for use in a wider variety of application than convention fibers because of
superior mechanical plop~.lies.
Another object of the invention is to provide a lower cost method of producing such
adsorbent m~t~-.ri~l~
Still another object ofthe invention is to provide such materials in forms suitable for
use as extremely high efficiency filters.
These and other objects of the invention are described in greater detail below, with
refele.lce to specific examples and embolliment~ of the invention.
V. Brief Description of the Drawings
Figures 1-5 are adsorption isotherms illustrating the efficiency of the materials made
according to the invention for adsorption of CO2, ethane, acetone, butane and HCl.
VI. Detailed Description of the Invention
The invention employs a phenolic resin in the form of a low viscosity melt, or in a
solution (such as an ethanol solution). The resin may be a novolac resin, a resol, or a low
viscosity pitch, but other resins that will produce a reasonable concentration of chars (as low
as 10% by weight) also may be used in order to achieve certain desirable characteristics in the
final product. The resin or resin solution is exposed to a suitable cross-linking agent (which
are generally known in the art to include resols, hexamethylen~t~ e, and ~ Lules of
hydrochloric acid with formaldehyde, but also may be air (depending upon the resin
employed)). Thus, for example, one may employ an ethanol solution of a novolac resin and
5-14% by weight of a cross-linking agent such as hexamethylenetetramine.
The resin (and, where combined in solution or mixture, the cross-linking agent) is
applied to coat an inert fiber substrate (such as a substrate made from glass fibers or mineral
fibers), which may take the form of a woven or nonwoven fabric, a felt, or even paper, with
the dissolved resin. The fiber substrate material is coated preferably by dip coating, vacuum
impregnation, or spraying. The coated fiber then is cured in a conventional manner to trigger

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
W O 96138232 PCTrUS96/0656
S the cross-linking reaction, as for example, by heating to about 165~C if the cross-linking
agent is h~mP,thylenetcll~l~ille. (If a phenolic resin solution is employed, the solvent must
first be removed by heating the coated substrate to a tclll~,dlule sufficiently high to
volatilize the solvent.) Curing may take place in one or more steps over a succes~ion of
tempcl~ cs, in order to hlclcase the concellLIdlion of chars in the coating and minimi7e the
10 amount of coating that is vol~tili7~1
The cured, coated m~teri~l then is activated to produce an activated carbon-coated
assembly by proce~ing the m~t~.ri~l in a heated environment co~ g an etçh~nt
according to any of several techniques tli~cucsecl below. The specific technique employed
will vary, depending upon the desired pore size and surface chemistry in the final material to
15 be produced. The activation temperature and time, along with the etchant, will determine the
specific pore size and surface c~l~onni.~try. In general, increase in activation temperature and/or
time will produce a surface having a larger pore size than a correspondingly lesser activation
lclllpeldlule and/or time. Likewise, if the etchant is selected to produce a chemically active
fiber (~le~igntocl to selectively adsorb acidic or basic cont~min~ntc, for exarnple), increasing
20 the flow rate of the etchant increases the concentration of chemically active species in the
fiber.
Thus, to produce a fiber assembly having basic surface chemistry (which is desirable
for adsorption of acidic cont~min~nt~), the coated material is activated in ammonia (or a
llliXLulc of nitrogen and hydrogen) at 400-900~C for a period of time ranging from minlltes to
25 hours, depending upon the desired pore size. The resulting assemblies have B.E.T. surface
areas ranging from 400-1600 m2/g calculated based upon the weight percent of resin coating.
The use of ammonia as an etchant produces a material with a coating having a nitrogen
content from about 1-10% by weight.
Similarly, to produce materials having an acidic surface chemi.ctry, and a pore size of
30 less than about 7A, the coated material is activated in air at 300-450~C for several minutes to
several hours. Once again, the pore size increases with increased activation tc,l,pe,dlu,e

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
W 096/38232 PCT/U~ Cl
and/or time. The reslllting fibers have B.E.T. surface areas ranging from 50-650 m2/g. The
use of air as the etchant produces a fiber with a coating that is 20-30% oxygen by weight.
Other oxidants (such as ll~ixLu-es of sulfuric and nitric acids, or mixtures such as hydrogen
peroxide and acetic acid) also may be used as elcl~ll~ to create acidic surface çh~mi.ctries.
Weakly acidic chPmictries also can be produced using the present invention by using
steam or CO2 as the etchant. The coated fibers are activated in steam or carbon dioxide at
600-900~C for several "~ es to several hours, and, as above, the pore size will increase in
relation to increased activation time and/or tellll)~.dlule. Fibers produced using this
embodiment of the invention are believed to exhibit B.E.T. surface areas ranging from about
600-2800 m2/g and an oxygen content of 0-5% by weight.
Inert gases, such as argon or nitrogen, also may be used to activate the coating applied
to the fiber substrate. It is believed that such inert gases activate the coating by causing the
coating to tent over the fiber matrix (which prevents the coating from shrinking upon
heating). In this embodiment, the coated fibers are placed in a high lelllp~ .dLule environment
(above 600DC) under a flow of inert gas, and held for a period of time sufficient to create
pores of a desired size.
Pores also may be created in the coating by other techniques. For example, soluble
inorganic compounds, in the form fine particulates (on the order of l~lm), may be dispersed
within the resin prior to coating. Such inorganic m~tçri~lc must, in order to be used in the
invention, remain stable through at least the curing step of the process for making the coated
fibers, and if an etching step also is used for the particular embodiment, must be stable
through the etching step. Thereafter, the coated materials co~ g the soluble inorganic
matter is placed in a solvent to dissolve the soluble inorganic material. The solvent must be
selected to avoid degrading or dissolving the phenolic resin coating.
Likewise, one or more polymers in addition to the resin that is used for coating the
fibers may be added to the coating. These polymers are selected because they degrade or
volatilize at lower temperatures (such as poly(ethylene oxide)) than the resin coating.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
W O gG,~Q~2 PCTrUS96/06561
S Following the curing step, these m~t~ri~lc are vol~tili7e-1, usually by degradation processes,
leaving behind pores of a size ~letermin~cl by the particular polymer employed and the
concentration of the polymer.
Finally, the resin coating may include one or more metals (in trace amounts) that are
used to catalyze chemical reactions. For example, such metals as chro~ l, copper,
10 lil~~ n, or nickel may be included in the resin prior to coating, to catalyze the
decomposition of toxic gases. The metals also may be added after activation by coating the
fibers with a l~ ulc of catalyst and a solvent, and then vaporizing the solvent. This would
be particularly advantageous where the coated fibers are used in devices such as gas masks to
adsorb gases employed in chemical w~ur~c.
Thus, in general, it may be desirable to produce a fiber having a coating with small
pore sizes for use in adsorbing extremely small molecules, such as (for example) CH4, Rn,
NH3, SOx, and HCl. The surface ch~rnictry variations permitted by the present invention can
also be manipulated, along with the pore size, to produce fibers tailored to adsorb specific
co~ i "~ . " .~.
Examples illustrating the method of making fibers according to the invention, and the
benefits obtained thereby, are set forth below.
EXAMPLE I
52.95 g of novolac (GP2006) were mixed with 5.92 g h~x~methylenetetramine, and
then dissolved in 73.11 mL ethanol to make a solution of 48/50 weight percent resin.
25 Preweighed samples of fiberglass lcil~lcelllent (plast #257) made of woven S2 glass fibers
were dipped into the resin solution and cured in a tube furnace under argon at a flow rate of
130-200mL/min. The coated fiberglass was heated in the furnace to 100~C for 20 min to
remove the solvent. The coated fiberglass then was cured, first by heating the coated
fiberglass to 150~C for 20 min, and then at 170~C for an additional 20 min. Descriptions of
30 the samples so produced are set forth in Table I.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96/38232 PCI/US96/06S61
TABLE I
Weight of Coated
Sample No. Weight of Uncoated Fibc. glass, After Weight % Resin
Fiberglass Curing
0.7313 1.0501 30.4
2 0.623 0.3085 33.09
3 0.7948 1.2129 34.47
4 0.8819 1.3295 33.67
0.6923 0.8899 22.2
6 0.7904 1.0403 23.4
7 0.7098 0.9269 23.4
8 0.8400 1.1429 26.5
9 0.7648 1.0879 29.6
0.5588 0.8190 31.77
11 0.4898 0.7571 35.31
It has been found that impregnation of more than 35% resin by weight limits the flexibility of
woven coated material; however, for nonwoven materials, substantially more resin (up to
about 60% by weight resin) may desirably be employed.
The coated fiberglass then is activated by exposing the fiber to ammonia at a high
temperature to produce a very high surface area carbon fiber with basic surface chemistry
permitting adsorption of acidic co~ ."il-~nt~. Activation is accomplished by placing the
coated fiberglass in a tube furnace or other similar heating device and flowing ammonia over
the material while heating it. This has the effect of etching the coating to produce a basic,
15 microporous coated assembly which retains most of its weight, and exhibits a marked
increase in surface area and nitrogen content, revealing the basic surface chemistry of the
fiber. An example of the etching process and its results follows.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO ~f'3~ 2 PCI/US96/06561
EXAMPLE II
Samples of phenolic-coated glass fiber m~t~ri~l, ranging in mass from 0.6-0.9 g, were
placed in a tube furnace and heated in amrnonia at a flow rate of 200mL/min until reac~ing
600-800~C and held at that ~e~ e~ e for a predelf ~ d time. The samples were then
cooled, and held at 200~C for two hours. The char~ctçri~tics of the samples are set forth in
Table II.
TABLE II
Original
Sample No. Reaction Reaction Weight Loss Resin Activation
Temp. (~C) Time(hrs) (g) Weight(g) Yield (~/O)
600 1 0.0929 0.2262 58.9
2 700 1 0.0929 0.2079 55.32
3 800 0.5 0.0766 0.1573 51.3
4 800 1 0.1248 0.2166 42.38
800 2 0.1523 0.2330 34.64
The surface area of each of these samples was measured using nitrogen adsorption techniques
at 77~K with a Micromeritrics ASAP 2400 and elemental analysis techniques using a Control
15 Eq~ ment Corp. 240XA elem~nt~l analyzer. The results of those analyses is set forth in
Table III.
TABLE III
B.E.T.
Sample No. Surface Nitrogen Hydrogen
Area Carbon (~/O) (~/O) Oxygen (%) (%)
(m2lg)
710 69.95+/- 1.373+/-0.44 26.804 1.873+/-
13.74 0.0907
2 853.38 92.64+/-9.55 5.36+/-0.846 0.63 1.37+/-0.081
3 807.39 65.37+/-7.19 3.48+/-0.415 30.241 0.909+/-0.2
4 1107.48 80.25+/-2.46 4.67+/-0.433 13.94 1.14+/-0.086
1245 87.61+/-7.28 4.86+/-1.12 5.76 1.77+/-0.484
The coated fibers may be used for adsorption of acidic, polar, and nonpolar gases. As
20 shown in the adsorption isotherms of Figures 1-5, CO2, ethane, acetone, HCl and butane all
may be efficaciously adsorbed upon the coated fibers of the present invention. The isotherms

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96/38232 PCI/US~ 'O~
S of Figures 1~5 were prepared by mP~cll-ing adsorption at room t~ eldl~e using volurnetric
techniques (with a Coulter Omnisorb 100) and gravimetrically (using a TGA 951 connected
to a TA Instrurnents 2100 system C~ ULC1 and three Tylan General FC-280 mass flow
controllers used to dilute standard concentration gas to lower concentration). These results
reveal that the activated carbon-coated fibers of the present invention are much more cost-
10 effective per unit weight than conventional activated carbon fibers for removing
Col~t~ ntc.
In another embodiment of the invention, the coated fibers are activated in heated air toproduce activated carbon coated fibers have acidic surface chemistry in order to permit the
desirable adsorption of small molecules having a basic chemistry. The coated fibers also may
15 be activated by other heated gases, such as argon and carbon dioxide, to produce desirable
surface chemistries. These techniques are described more fully in the examples set forth
below.
EXAMPLE III
Samples of phenolic-coated glass fiber material, ranging in mass from 0.6-0.9 g, were
20 placed in a tube furnace and heated in air at a flow rate of 210 mL/min, where they were held
for five ~inl~lec at 400~C, and then heated to 450~C and held for a predetermined time, as
specified in Table IV. The samples then were cooled in argon and held at 200~C for two
hours. The characteristics of the sarnples are set forth in Table IV.
TABLE IV
Reaction Original B.E.T.
Sample Time Weight Resin Activation Surface
No. (minutes) Loss Weight Yield (%) Area(m2/g)
(g) (g)
0.0294 0.1023 71.3 196
2 20 0.0375 0.0974 61.5 230
3 25 0.0365 0.0894 59.2 252
4 37 0.0531 0.080064 33.7 452
31 0.0436 0.078672 44.6 407
6 45 0.0559 0.066384 15.8 318

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96138232 PCI'tUS96/06S61
The surface area of each of these samples was measured using nitrogen adsorption techniques
at 77~K with a Micromeritrics ASAP 2400 and elem~nt~l analysis techniques using a Control
Equipment Corp. 240XA elem~?nt~l analyzer.
EXAMPLE IV
In another embodiment of the invention, the coated glass fibers were activated in
10 argon. A coated fiber assembly was placed in a tube furnace that was purged with argon for
ten ~ es at a flow rate of 4800 mL/min. The sample was held in the furnace at 200~C for
ten lllhlules in argon at the same flow rate, and then heated to 600~C and held at that
le,l,pe,a~ule for 25 mimltes The sample was allowed to cool to room temperature in argon,
and then degassed in argon at 200~C for two hours, producing a coated carbon fiber with a
15 B.E.T. surface area of 641m2/g.
EXAMPLE V
Phenolic resin-coated glass fiber assemblies were activated in carbon dioxide byplacing the fibers in a tube furnace under argon for 50 minlltes at a flow rate of 2990 mL/min.
The samples then were heated in carbon dioxide at a flow rate of 503 mL/min. to the desired
20 telllpeldlure (ranging from 600-800~C) for a predet~rmin~ length of time. The sample then
was cooled in argon and held at 200~C for approximately 2 hours at a flow rate of
2990 mL/min. This creafed a porous carbon-coated fiber having the characteristics set forth
below in Table V.
TABLE V
B.E.T.
Sample No. Reaction Reaction Acli~alion Surface
From Temperature Time (hrs) Yield Area (m2/g)
Example I (~C)
600 1.5 62.87 744
700 1.5 61.6 600
11 800 1.5 48.47 800
3 800 3 43.2 900
11

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
W O 96/38232 PCTnUS~-'06~C
Fibers made according to the present invention may be regenerated using any of the
collv~lllional regen. .d~ion techniques, including heating in nitrogen, electrical resistance
he~ting, or other conventional regeneration techniques that do not produce degradation. Low
telllpel~lul~ heating of the fiber assembly following co~ adsorption will return the
fiber to its original working capacity so that the fiber assembly may be used again. Purging
10 techniques, by which the col~ is chemically displaced from the fiber, also may be
used to remove co"~ "il-~-t~ from the samples, but less effectively than the heating
techniques mentioned above.
EXAMPLE VI
Novolac solutions were prepared with varying ratios of novolac to
h~x~methylenetetramine concentrations, to alter the final cross-link density upon curing.
These solutions also contained dir~ quantities of solvent (ethanol) to vary the viscosity.
Nonwoven fiberglass reinforcement m~tPri~l from Fibre Glast Developments Corp. were
impregn~te~l under vacuum using standard vacuum impregnation techniques, to produce
coated fibers up to 45% by weight resin. These samples were heated in dirr~lelll air/nitrogen
mixtures and reacted at telllpelaLul~ s from 350-750~C for a period ranging from several
hlu~es up to one hour.
Accordingly, the activated, coated fiber assemblies of the present invention exhibit
notable advantages over conventional activated carbon fibers. First, the wide range of fiber
substrate materials that may be used in the present invention offers greater versatility than
activated carbon fibers. Second, the starting materials are of far lower cost than conventional
materials, and exhibit better mechanical integrity and wear resistance than conventional
activated carbon materials. The coated fibers of the invention also exhibit resi.~t~nce to
shrinkage, resulting in higher surface areas and higher yields than conventional activated
carbon fibers under similar activation conditions. And the techniques of the present invention
make it far easier to less expensive to m~nllf~rture and process materials for cont~min~nt
removal.

CA 02236204 1997-11-26
WO 96/38232 PCI~/US96/06561
Moreover, the invention is able to produce both coated materials on woven and
nollwo\~en substrates, useful to adsorb co~ and, as noted above, to catalyze their
decomposition. Nonwoven m~ri~l~ having a high weight percentage (45-60%) of resin may
also be used as filters for extremely fine particulates, germs and molecules, because of their
extremely fine pore structure.
Finally, the coated fibers may be used as ion exchange systems, by further processing
of the coated fibers. For example, it is believed that the fibers made according to Example I
may be heated at about 100~C in concellll~led sulfuric acid under inert conditions to produce
a sulfonated coated fabric. Likewise, a fiber assembly could be impregnated with a
melamine, oligomeric resin lllixtule to create an ion exchange coated assembly.
The present invention has been described with respect to certain embodiments andconditions, which are not meant to and should not be construed to limit the invention. Those
skilled in the art will understand that variations from the embodiments and conditions
described herein may be made without departing from the invention as claimed in the
appended claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2236204 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2001-05-09
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-05-09
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-05-09
Inactive: Entity size changed 1999-09-23
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1999-02-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-01-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-01-20
Request for Examination Received 1999-01-20
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1998-10-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 1998-08-18
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-08-18
Classification Modified 1998-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 1998-08-17
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-08-17
Inactive: IPC removed 1998-08-17
Inactive: IPC removed 1998-08-17
Letter Sent 1998-08-12
Inactive: Single transfer 1998-08-06
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 1998-08-06
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-08-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-08-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-08-04
Classification Modified 1998-08-04
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1998-07-21
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1998-07-15
Application Received - PCT 1998-07-10
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1998-05-11
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1996-12-05

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-05-09
1998-05-11

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1999-04-16

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 1997-11-26
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1998-05-11 1998-08-06
Registration of a document 1998-08-06
Reinstatement 1998-08-06
Request for examination - standard 1999-01-20
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1999-05-10 1999-04-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT OFFICE
Past Owners on Record
JAMES ECONOMY
MICHAEL DALEY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1998-08-21 1 25
Description 1997-11-26 13 584
Abstract 1997-11-26 1 41
Claims 1997-11-26 2 61
Drawings 1997-11-26 5 56
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1998-07-13 1 115
Notice of National Entry 1998-07-15 1 209
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1998-07-13 1 189
Notice of Reinstatement 1998-08-12 1 172
Request for evidence or missing transfer 1998-11-30 1 110
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1999-02-15 1 172
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-02-19 1 115
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-02-19 1 115
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2000-06-06 1 184
Correspondence 1998-11-18 17 717
Correspondence 1998-10-19 1 14
PCT 1997-11-26 20 689
Correspondence 1998-07-21 1 34
Correspondence 1999-09-21 2 41
Fees 1998-08-06 1 42
Fees 1999-04-16 1 31