Language selection

Search

Patent 2239791 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2239791
(54) English Title: SEPARATION OF MIDDLE BOILERS FROM A MIXTURE OF LOW, MIDDLE AND HIGH BOILERS
(54) French Title: SEPARATION DE FRACTIONS MOYENNES A PARTIR D'UN MELANGE DE FRACTIONS BASSES, MOYENNES ET ELEVEES
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 3/38 (2006.01)
  • B01D 3/14 (2006.01)
  • C01B 21/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WATZENBERGER, OTTO (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
(71) Applicants :
  • BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-01-31
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1996-12-20
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-06-26
Examination requested: 2001-12-18
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1996/005772
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1997022550
(85) National Entry: 1998-06-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/688,281 (United States of America) 1996-07-29
19547758.8 (Germany) 1995-12-20

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process is disclosed for separating a fraction which contains low and medium
boiling substances from a mixture of low, medium
and high boiling substances. The mixture is treated at the bottom of the
distillation column with low boiling vapour, enriching the low
boiling vapour with medium boiling substances which can then be extracted at
the temperature level of the low boiling substance.


French Abstract

Ce procédé sert à séparer une fraction contenant des substances à bas et moyen points d'ébullition contenues dans un mélange de substances à bas, moyen et haut points d'ébullition. Le mélange est traité au bas de la colonne de distillation avec de la vapeur à bas point d'ébullition, de façon à enrichir la vapeur à bas point d'ébullition en substances à point d'ébullition moyen, ce qui permet de les extraire au niveau de la température de la substance à bas point d'ébullition.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process for separating a fraction containing low and middle boilers (L,M
fraction) from a homogeneous mixture comprising low, middle and high boilers
(L,M,H mixture), which comprises treating the L,M,H mixture in a column with
low -boiler vapour in the bottom and separating it into an L,M fraction and an
L,H
fraction.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the L,M,H mixture is treated by
passing low-boiler vapour into the bottom of the column.
3. A process as claimed in claim 7 or 2, wherein treatment takes place in
countercurrent.
4. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the column
used is a stripping column.
5. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the L,M fraction
is taken off at the vertical level of the infeed tray or above.
6. A process as claimed in claim 5, wherein the L,M fraction is taken off from
the top of the column.
7. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the L,M fraction
is passed into a rectifying column in which the low-boiling component is
separated off so as to give an L,M fraction richer in medium-boiling
component.
8. A process as claimed in claim 7, wherein the rectifying column is mounted
onto the treatment column, low-boiling component is distilled off from the
top,
and the L,M fraction enriched with medium-boiling component is removed by
way of a sidestream offtake.

15
9. A process as claimed in claim 8, wherein the treatment column
communicates with the bottom of a side column and the rectifying column
communicates with the top of the side column.
10. The process of claim 8, wherein the treating column and the rectifying
column together form a combined stripping-rectifying column and the stripping-
rectifying column is equipped with an essentially vertical dividing wall; said
dividing wall being situated at the level at which the L,M,H mixture is
supplied.
11. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein, in a further
column with rectifying section and stripping section, the L,M fraction is
separated
or concentrated at the middle boiler.
12. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the low-boiling
component taken off from the column or the rectifying column may after
compression at least in part be passed back into the bottom of the column.
13. Use of a process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 for obtaining
thermally sensitive medium-boiling products.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


' v' CA 02239791 1998-06-17 2.
Separation of middle boilers from a mixture of low,
middle and high boilers
The present invention relates to a process for separating
middle boilers from a mixture of low, middle and high
boilers which is separated into a fraction containing low
and middle boilers and a fraction containing low and high
boilers.
A problem frequently encountered in the chemical industry
is the need to separate the middle boilers in pure form
or with only traces of low boilers from a liquid multi-
substance mixture consisting of a low- (L), middle- (M)
and high-boiler (H) fraction.
To do this it is possible to employ the known distil-
lation methods, for example those described in Ullmann's
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry Vol. B3, page 4-46
et seq. A common feature of the known' distillation
methods is that the high boilers are drawn off at the
bottom in pure form, or possibly with residual traces of
middle boilers, and that the middle-boiling component is
separated off at the top of the column at temperatures
determined largely by .the concentration of the high-
boiling component and its boiling temperature. Further-
more, with the known methods it is not possible to co-
separate a mixture of low and middle boilers while at the
same time separating out a mixture of low and high
boilers which is free from middle boilers. In many cases,
however, this would be desirable, especially if low and
high boilers are to be put to some further conjoint use
(sale, recovery, disposal).
Page 4-48 of the abovementioned publication describes the
use of side columns for separating middle boilers from
the mixture of low, middle and high boilers (L,M,H
mixture). In this case too, low and high boilers are
always separated. The same applies to the directly or
indirectly coupled columns describe on pages 4-62 and

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 2 -
4-63 in the abovementioned publication. In all of these
cases it is ultimately necessary to separate the middle-
boiling component from the high-boiling component by
means of distillation, which in every case requires
boiling temperatures which are at least equal to that of
the middle-boiling component and, in extreme cases, are
close to the boiling temperature of the high-boiling
component and are therefore very high. This is partic-
ularly the case a.f the middle-boiling component must be
separated completely from the high-boiling component.
Such high temperatures may arise that, even in the case
of relatively heat-stable substances, decomposition or
chemical conversion (polymerization etc.) of the sub-
stances involved may occur. For this reason, complex
distillation techniques, for example gentle distillations
carried out under reduced-pressure conditions (thin-film
_. evaporators, molecular jet distillation, etc.) are often
necessary far separation tasks of this kind. Such distil
lation techniques have the disadvantage that the through
puts are extremely low. This leads to high capital
investment and product costs, which may mean that a
distillative separation which per se is advantageous may
not be economic to carry out.
Also known are special techniques for separating
difficult-to-separate liquid mixtures. Special techniques
are only relevant if they are more cost-effective or when
other, common techniques have failed. They are frequently
employed with substances whose capacity to withstand
thermal stress is limited, ie. if the boiling point is
above or close to the decomposition temperature. A known
method of separating components of low volatility from
mixtures comprising immiscible components is that of
carrier-gas distillation. The basis for this method is
that, in a mixture of immiscible substances, each
substance behaves as if the other was not there; in other
words, at a given temperature, each substance possesses
a partial pressure which - independently of the
composition of the mixture -is equal to the vapor

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 3 -
pressure of the substance concerned. Consequently, the
pressure over such a mixture a.s equal to the sum of the
vapor pressures of the individual components. A known
example of this is the water/bromobenzene system. The
mixture boils at 95°C, whereas the pure substances boil
at 100°C (water) and 156°C (bromobenzene). Carrier-gas
distillation is suitable in particular for separating
miscible components of relatively high boiling point
(eg. glycerol), for separating substances which
polymerize or decompose even before reaching the boiling
point (fatty acids), and for separating substances which
are very difficult to handle and for which direct heating
to the boiling point may be hazardous (eg. turpentine).
The best-luiown example of carrier-gas distillation is
.15 steam distillation, ie. where steam is the carrier gas.
__ It is extensively employed, for example, in the pet-
roleum-processing industry. for removing light hydro-
carbons from absorber oils; in the coal industry, for the
steam distillation of hydrocarbon cuts from the coal
distillation operation; for separating off turpentine
from resins in the rubber industry; and a.n preparative
organic chemistry. Steam distillation is a special form
of azeotropic or extractive distillation, as described in
the abovementioned publication on pages 4-50 to 4-52. The
technical effect of this process is based on the finding
that, by adding a substitute substance (an entrainer),
the azeotropic point is surpassed and, consequently, the
desired concentration above the azeotropic point is
achieved.
All of these techniques have the disadvantage that an
additive (entrainer) is introduced into the system which
is to be distilled, and this entrainer then has to be
separated off from the system again by way of an add-
itional process step.
A further known method of removing relatively high-
boiling substances from a mixture of substances is

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 4 -
stripping. Stripping has the disadvantage that it always
produces only a highly dilute solution of the high-
boiling component or middle-boiling component a.n the
stripping medium, thereby necessitating a laborious and
costly separation. In general, the process is only
economical when the products can be separated by phase
separation, ie. when the mixture of substances exhibits
a miscibility gap.
It is an object of the present invention, therefore, to
provide a simple and gentle process for separating a
middle-boiling component or a fraction comprising low and
middle boilers from a mixture which includes low, middle
and high boilers.
We have found that this object can be achieved, sur
_. 15 prisingly, if the abovementioned mixture in a column is
treated in the bottom with low-boiler vapor.
The present invention consequently provides a process for
separating a fraction containing low and middle boilers
(L,M fraction) and a fraction containing low and high
boilers (L,H fraction) from a homogeneous mixture com-
prising low, middle and high boilers (L,M,H mixture),
which comprises treating the L,M,H mixture in a column
with low-boiler vapor and separating it into an L,M
fraction and an L,H fraction. The middle-boiling
component accumulates in the low-boiler vapor, so that
the L,M fraction can be recovered above the infeed site
of the mixture, and the L,H fraction is obtained in the
liquid phase.
The mixture to be separated is generally passed directly
to the top of the column. The treatment of the mixture
with the low-boiler vapor is preferably carried out in
countercurrent and, in particular, by passing low-boiler
vapor into the bottom of the column or by. supplying
liquid low-boiling component and boiling it up in the
bottom. The low-boiling component supplied to the column

' CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 5 -
is usually the same as that present a.n the mixture.
It has been found particularly advantageous to carry out
the treatment with low-boiler vapor in a stripping
column. This can be a customary plate column, for example
a bubble-cap or sieve plate column, or can be provided
with a customary packing, for example Raschig rings, Pall
rings, saddles, etc., and preferably has a theoretical
plate number in the range from 5 to 100. Depending on the
separation task at hand, the plate number may even be
more than 100.
As a result of passing low-boiler vapor into the bottom
of the column, the middle-boiling component accumulates
in the low-boiler vapor. The L,M fxaction is
advantageously obtained at or above the vertical level of
-- 15 the infeed plate. Preferably, the L,M fraction is drawn
off from the top of the column.
The L,M fraction generally comprises the low-boiling
component in a large to very large excess. It is there-
fore particularly advantageous to concentrate the L,M
fraction in order to enrich it with middle-boiling
component. This can be done,' for example, by passing the
L,M fraction into a separate, multistage column, which
serves as a rectifying column, in which the low-boiling
component is separated off to give an L,M fraction richer
in middle-boiling component, or even a pure middle-
boiling component.
It is particularly preferable to provide the rectifying
column as a separate distillation column or to mount it
directly onto the column in which treatment with low-
boiler vapor takes place and to distill off the low-
boiling component from the top. The enriched L,M fraction
or the middle-boiling component can be removed via a
sidestream offtake of ,the column return flow. It is
particularly preferred in this context to employ an
essentially vertical dividing wall. In this case, the

' CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 6 -
mixture which is to be separated is supplied approxim-
ately in the center of the stripping-rectifying column.
At the vertical level of this supply point, a dividing
wall is installed in the column over an extent of in
general from 1 to 10, from 1 to 5, theoretical plates in
such a way that the column is divided vertically into two
separate sections, infeed taking place approximately in
the center of the dividing wall. In this way, the frac-
tion enriched with medium-boiling component can be taken
off on the side opposite the infeed site, in the region
of the dividing wall. The dividing wall separates the
~offtake site from the infeed site. Equal concentrations
of medium-boiling component are present on either side of
the dividing wall, although high boilers are present in
the mixture only on the infeed-site side. The fraction
enriched with medium-boiling component is preferably
-.- taken off approximately at the vertical level of the
infeed or, if appropriate, somewhat below this point.
As an alternative to the embodiment including a dividing
wall, it is also possible to mount a side column up -
against the stripping-rectifying column, in such a way
that the side column communicates with the gaseous and
liquid phases of the stripping-rectifying column in each
case at one or more separating stages above and below the
infeed site, and the fraction richer in middle-boiling
component is taken off via the side column. The side
column is configured such that high-boiling component
cannot pass over to the offtake side of the side column.
Measures suitable for this purpose are familiar to the
skilled worker.
If desired, a droplet separator (demister or other
customary device) may be installed over the infeed plate
or in the vapor offtake in such a Way as to prevent the
high-boiling component being entrained by means of
droplets.
The L,M fraction enriched in middle-boiling component by

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 7 _
the abovementioned rectifying column'may, if desired, be a
separated or concentrated in a further column with a
rectifying section and a stripping section.
A further advantageous embodiment of the novel process
comprises passing the vapors from the stripping column or
stripping-distillation column, possibly after conven-
tional compression, as low-boiling components or low-
boiler vapor back into the bottom of the treatment
column. Since in the novel process direct heating takes
place with low-boiling component or low-boiler vapor, and
vapor compression need only overcome the differential
pressure over the column, it is possible to bring about
a drastic reduction in energy consumption and, at the
same time, in the input required for cooling.
_. 15 The treatment column and/or rectifier or distillation
column can be operated at atmospheric, subatmospheric or
superatmospheric pressure and continuously or batchwise.
Against this background, the conditions depend of course
on the mixtures to be separated, and can be determined by
the skilled worker i.n a conventional manner. A critical
factor is the temperature of the low-boiler vapor, which
must be high enough for the L,M fraction to be distilled
off and the L,H fraction to be obtained in the bottom of
the column.
The novel process has the advantage that it is easy to
carry out and that it manages without the addition of any
extraneous substance. The concentration of middle-boiling
component is low over the entire process range. The
residence time in the process, ie. in the columns, is
relatively short. Owing to the simplicity of the process,
the capital investment required is low. Moreover, the
process is almost infinite in its scale-up possibilities.
The novel process makes it possible to carry out ex-
tremely gentle separation of an L,M fraction or of the
middle-boiling component from a mixture comprising low,

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- g -
middle and high boilers, at the temperature level of the
boiling point of the low-boiling component. The process
is therefore particularly advantageous if it is necessary
to separate as gently as possible a thermally sensitive
middle-boiling, component, which has a tendency, for
example, to undergo decomposition or polymerization, from
an L,M,Fi mixture. The process is, particularly
advantageous if the high-boiling component present in the
crude mixture is, in its pure or highly enriched form,
alternatively of high viscosity, precipitates as a solid,
or at a relatively high concentration has a tendency to
enter into a chemical reaction, for example a
polymerization. The novel process in fact ensures that
the high-boiling component dissolved in the low-boiling
component can be stripped off. As a result, it is
necessary only to handle solutions; in other words,
-- problems with viscosity, solids, etc., are avoided.
The novel process a.s particularly suitable for obtaining
thermally sensitive products. Examples of this appli
cation are:
- obtaining an aqueous hydroxylamine solution from an
aqueous solution of a hydroxylamine salt,
- obtaining polymerizable compounds, for example
recovering styrene from mixtures obtained in the
production of styrene,
- obtaining chlorinated hydrocarbons, for example
recovering dichloroethane from mixtures obtained in
the production of dichloroethane,
- recovering carboxylic acids and aldehydes from the
stripping acids of cyclohexane oxidation with air or
from the production of adipic acid,
- separating organic acids and aldehydes, such as
acetic acid, acrylic acid, methacrolein or
methacrylic acid, from production effluence which
may still contain high boilers, organic compounds,
salts (catalysts), etc., and
- separating amines from mixtures comprising ammonia
and high boilers.

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 9 -
The novel process is illustrated in more detail with
reference to the layout shown in Figure 1:
Figure 1 shows a column for separating an L,M,H mixture,
comprising a stripping column 1 on which a rectifying
column. 2 is mounted. The mixture to be separated is
supplied directly to the top of the stripping column 1.
Low-boiler vapor L is passed into the bottom of the
stripping column 1 in countercurrent to this mixture. At
the bottom of the column, an L,H fraction is taken off,
while at the top of the column. an L,M fraction is
obtained which a.s essentially free from high-boiling
components. This fraction a.s concentrated, ie. enriched
with medium-boiling component, in the rectifying column.
The enriched L,M fraction is taken off somewhat above the
infeed site of the mixture to be separated. Low-boiling
. component is obtained at the top of the rectifying
column, and can if desired be condensed and passed on for
subsequent utilization. Alternatively, the low-boiling
component can be passed back, directly or after
compression, into the bottom of the stripping column 1.
The examples which follow illustrate the invention
without restricting it.
Example 1
Obtaining an aqueous hydroxylamine (HA) solution from a
hydroxylamine (HA)/ammonium sulfate (AS) solution using
a stripping column
An aqueous solution containing 218 g of HA/1 and 680 g of
AS/1 was supplied at a rate of 300 ml/h to the topmost
stage of a stripping column. The stripping column was
made of glass, had a height of 2 m and a diameter of
mm, and was packed over a vertical extent of 1.8 m
with 3 mm glass Raschig rings. 1000 ml/h of distilled
water were supplied to the bottom of the column. The
column was under a pressure of 40 kPa. The bottom
35 temperature was 84°C. 1000 ml/h of aqueous, salt-free HA

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 10 -
solution were distilled off at a rate of 39..0 g of HA/h
from the top of the column, corresponding to 59.6 of the
entire HA in the feed. 300 ml/h of ammonium sulfate
solution with an HA content of 86.0 g of HA/1 were taken
off from the bottom of the column. This corresponds to .
39.4 of the total HA in the feed.
The maximum concentration of FiA in the column was 100
g/1. The quantity of liquid in the column, depending on
the particular loading, was 20-225 ml. The residence time
of the liquid in the column was therefore only 1.5-10
minutes. The decomposition rate a.s low at this low
concentration and within the short time.
Further experiments are set out a.n the table below.
. - Table 1
Separation of an aqueous HA solution from an aqueous
HAAS solution
Fead HA coatnat8=O/- PressureColuma-headHA from HA at the
ml/h g/1 Steam kPa temper- the bottom
ature top
'C g/1 (k)
g/1 (~t)
318 Z22 11561 50.0 81.0 40.5 66.9 48.6 21.2
2 170 222 1060 70.0 90.5 22.8 65.6 45.2 17.2
0
370 219 1475A 100.4 100.9 32.4 62.2 75.6 47.8
179 105.5 153011100.8 100.6 9.0 70.5 29.0 27.6
245 220.0 1530A 100.8 100.6 28.0 73.3 54.0 42.2
150 4 990/1 100.8 100.0 0.4 68.1 0.8 15.7
2 150 5.6 990A 100.8 99.9 0.6 73.0 0.4 5.6
5
119 20.4 1063A 101.5 100.4 15.4 67.6 40.5 19.7
* The bottom of the column was heated by way of a
thermostat.
/1 For simultaneous bottom heating, the water was
30 supplied as superheated steam.
Example 2

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 11 -
Separation of an aqueous HA solution from an aqueous
HA/NazSO~ solution using a stripping column
The aqueous solution from Example 3, containing 11'~k by
weight of HA and 23.6 by weight of Na2S0~, was supplied
at a rate of 978 g/h to the topmost stage of a stripping
column. The stripping column was made of enamel, had a
height of 2 m and a diameter of 50 ~, and was packed
with 5 mm glass Raschig rings. The column Was at atmos-
pheric pressure. Steam at 2.5 bar absolute was passed
into the bottom of the column. The steam/feed ratio was
2.9:1. 985 g/h of sodium sulfate solution with an HA
content of 1.7 g of FiA/1 were taken off from the bottom
of the column. This corresponds to 1~ of the entire HA in
the feed. 3593 g/h of aqueous, salt-free HA solution
containing 36.8 g of HA/1 were distilled off from the top
-- of the column, corresponding to 99.2 of the entire HA in
the feed.
Further experiments are set out in the table below.
Table 2:
Separating an aqueous HA solution from an aqueous HA
sodium sulfate solution

CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 12 -
Feed HA contentSteam/ PressureColumn-headHA from HA at the
thn
g/h g/1 Feed kPa temper- top bottom
kg/kg ature
'C g/1 ('t) g/1
945 135 2.6 200 125.4 34.0 84.07.8 17
970 136 2.7 101 106.3 35.5 96.23.3 2.5
980 80 2.8 101 107.0 2.1 95.5 0.45 5.7
Example 3
Obtaining an aqueous HA solution from an aqueous
HA/sodium sulfate solution using a stripping-distillation
column
An aqueous solution containing 221 g of HA/1 and 540 g of
AS/1 was supplied at a rate of 202 ml/h onto the 11th
_. tray of a glass bubble-cap column with a diameter of
35 mm, an overall height of 1.6 m and with 21 trays
(lowest tray - tray 1). 1300 ml/h of steam (at about
125°C) were supplied to the bottom of the column. The
pressure in the column was 99 kPa. At the top of the
column, 180 ml/h of substantially HA-free water (0.6 g
of HA/1) were taken off at a column-head temperature of
99.8°C and with a reflux ratio of 1:3 (return flow .
infeed). The aqueous HA solution (product solution) was
taken off at a rate of 1180 ml/h and with a concentration
of 44 g/1 via a sidestream, from tray 12. 400 ml/h of
salt solution were taken off at the bottom of the column.
Example 4
Obtaining an aqueous HA solution from an aqueous HA
sodium sulfate solution using a stripping-distillation
column, with concentration via a side offtake.
An aqueous HA solution as in Example 3, containing 11~ by
weight of HA and 23.6 by weight of Na2S04, was supplied
to the 11th theoretical plate of a glass bubble-cap
column with a diameter of 50 mm (tray number
corresponding to 30 theoretical plates). Steam at 2.5 bar

. ' CA 02239791 1998-06-17
- 13 -
absolute and at about 125°C was supplied to the bottom of
the column. The pressure in the column was 101 kPa.
Substantially HA-free water (0.05 g of HA/1) was taken
off at the top of the columa. The aqueous, salt-free HA
solution (product solution) was withdrawn in liquid form,
with a concentration of~8.3~ by weight, via a sidestream
from tray 12. The salt solution was taken off at the
bottom of the column with a residual HA content of 0.2~
by weight.
Example 5
Concentration of a salt-free aqueous hydroxylamine
solution by distillation
In a glass bubble-cap column with a diameter of 50 ~ and
30 bubble-cap trays, 1600 g/h of an 8.3~ strength by
.- 15 weight aqueous, salt-free stabilized hydroxylamine
solution were fed continuously onto the 8th tray. In
addition, a small quantity of stabilizer, dissolved a.n
hydroxylamine solution, was metered into the column at
the topmost tray, tray no. 30. The reflux ratio was set
at 0.5. Water was distilled off from the top of the
column. The distillate still contained a residual quan
tity of hydroxylamine of 0.07 by weight. About 240 ml/h
of a 50~ strength by weight hydroxylamine solution were
discharged by means of a pump from the bottom of the
column.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2016-12-20
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2010-08-10
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2010-08-10
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Grant by Issuance 2006-01-31
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-01-30
Pre-grant 2005-10-25
Inactive: Final fee received 2005-10-25
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-07-27
Letter Sent 2005-07-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-07-27
Inactive: IPC removed 2005-07-22
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-06-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-05-03
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-11-25
Letter Sent 2002-02-04
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-12-18
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-12-18
Request for Examination Received 2001-12-18
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1998-10-06
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-09-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-09-10
Classification Modified 1998-09-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-09-09
Inactive: Filing certificate correction 1998-09-03
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-09-03
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1998-08-18
Application Received - PCT 1998-08-17
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-06-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-11-18

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Past Owners on Record
OTTO WATZENBERGER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1998-09-11 1 5
Description 1998-06-17 13 553
Abstract 1998-06-17 1 51
Claims 1998-06-17 2 58
Drawings 1998-06-17 1 8
Cover Page 1998-09-11 1 40
Claims 1998-06-18 2 71
Claims 2005-05-03 2 67
Representative drawing 2006-01-05 1 7
Cover Page 2006-01-05 1 35
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1998-08-24 1 115
Notice of National Entry 1998-08-18 1 209
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-08-18 1 140
Notice of National Entry 1998-10-06 1 192
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-08-21 1 129
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2002-02-04 1 178
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-07-27 1 160
International preliminary examination report 1998-06-17 22 679
Correspondence 1998-09-03 2 112
PCT 1998-06-18 7 217
PCT 1999-05-27 8 250
Correspondence 2005-10-25 1 27
Correspondence 2010-08-10 1 46