Language selection

Search

Patent 2239974 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2239974
(54) English Title: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WASHING A PIPETTE PROBE
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET DISPOSITIF DE NETTOYAGE DE SONDE A PIPETTE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B08B 09/02 (2006.01)
  • B08B 03/04 (2006.01)
  • G01N 35/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HORSFALL, KATHERINE M. (United States of America)
  • KROGH, ROSS (United States of America)
  • LEONARD, DARCY (United States of America)
  • WIRBISKY, ALAN (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS, INC.
  • BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS, INC. (United States of America)
  • BECKMAN COULTER, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1996-07-12
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-02-06
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1996/011644
(87) International Publication Number: US1996011644
(85) National Entry: 1998-01-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/001,145 (United States of America) 1995-07-14

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method and an apparatus for washing a probe (15) in a receiving cup (20).
The probe (15) is positioned in the receiving cup (20) having a drain (26)
therein. Initially, fluid is dispensed through the probe (15) and
simultaneously drained from the receiving cup (20) through the drain (26) at
least as fast as it is dispensed into the cup (20). Once a sufficient volume
of fluid has been passed through the probe (15) to remove the majority of the
contaminants from the interior of the probe (15), the flow rate is increased
or the rate of evacuation of fluid from the receiving cup (20) is decreased,
or both, to build up a level of fluid in the receiving cup (20). This fluid is
allowed to contact and wash the interior of the probe (15) and fluid is
desirably continuously flushed through the probe until it has been
sufficiently cleaned.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé et un dispositif de nettoyage d'une sonde (15) dans une coupelle réceptrice (20). Le procédé consiste à disposer la sonde (15) dans la coupelle réceptrice (20) pourvue d'une évacuation (26). Au début, un liquide introduit par la sonde (15) s'évacue simultanément de la coupelle réceptrice (20) par l'évacuation (26) au moins aussi rapidement qu'il est introduit dans la coupelle (20). Une fois qu'un volume suffisant de fluide a circulé par la sonde (15) pour éliminer de l'intérieur de la sonde (15) la plupart des contaminants, on accroît le débit d'alimentation et/ou on réduit le débit d'évacuation de fluide au départ de la coupelle de réception (20), de façon à laisser le niveau de fluide remonter dans la coupelle de réception (20). On permet au fluide d'entrer en contact avec l'intérieur de la sonde (15) et de nettoyer ce dernier, à la suite de quoi, de préférence, on fait circuler du fluide par la sonde jusqu'à ce qu'elle soit suffisamment nettoyée.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


We claim:
1. A method for washing a probe in a receiving cup, comprising
positioning the probe so that fluid passing therethrough will be
deposited in the cup; carrying out a first washing stage by delivering
fluid through the probe while draining fluid from the cup at a rate no
less than the rate at which fluid is delivered through the probe; and,
thereafter, carrying out a second washing stage by delivering fluid
through the probe while draining fluid from the cup at a rate less than
the rate at which fluid is delivered through the probe to wash the
exterior of the probe.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the cup has an axis and the probe has
a tip and an axis, the probe being positioned so that its tip is positioned
within the cup and the axis of the probe is laterally displaced from the
axis of the cup.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein fluid is delivered through the probe at a
substantially constant rate and the rate at which fluid is drained from
the cup is varied between the first and second washing stages.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the cup is operatively connected to a
selectively controllable pump, the pump operating at a first, faster
pumping rate during the first washing stage and operating at a second,
slower pumping rate during the second washing stage.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein fluid is delivered through the probe at a
slower rate during the first washing stage than during the second
washing stage.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein fluid is drained from the cup under
gravity through a drain having fixed dimensions.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein wash fluid is passed through the probe
during the first washing stage at a rate slow enough to allow
substantially all of the wash fluid to exit the drain during the first
washing stage and wash fluid is passed through the probe during the
second washing stage at a rate greater than the rate at which the wash
fluid will exit the drain.

11
8. The method of claim 5 wherein the cup is positioned within a wash
basin, the fluid being allowed to overflow over a top of the cup into the
wash basin.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein fluid is drained from the wash basin
with assistance of a pump.
10. The method of claim 1 further comprising establishing a turbulent fluid
flow pattern in the cup during the second wash stage.
11. An apparatus for washing a probe, comprising a probe, a receiving cup
and a wash basin, the receiving cup being positioned within the wash
basin and the tip of the probe being positioned within the receiving
cup, the probe having an axis laterally displaced from an axis of the
cup.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein a top of the cup is positioned below
a top of the wash basin.
13. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the cup has a drain of fixed size
which directs fluid into the wash basin.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein the wash basin has a drain, a pump
being operatively connected to the drain of the wash basin to remove
contaminated fluid from the wash basin.
15. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the wash basin has a larger volume
than the volume of the cup.
16. An apparatus for washing a probe, comprising a probe adapted to pass
fluid therethrough, a receiving cup, and a selectively controllable pump
in fluid communication with the receiving cup and a controller; the
controller being adapted to drain fluid from the cup with the pump at a
rate greater than a rate at which fluid is delivered through the probe
during a first wash stage and to drain fluid from the cup with the pump
at a rate less than a rate at which fluid is delivered through the probe
during a second wash stage.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02239974 1998-01-14
W O 97/03766 PCTrUS96/11644
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WASHING A
I .1 .1 I t PROBE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an apparatus and a method for
cleansing liquid dispensers and has particular utility in cleansing pipetting
probes, such as the type of pipettes commonly used in automated analyzers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When a pipeKe or the like is used to dispense fluids, the fluid being
dispensed will tend to contaminate the interior of the tube or other structure
through which the fluid is dispensed. When fluids are transferred using
pipettes, an end of the pipette is commonly immersed in the fluid to aspirate
the fluid into the pipette. Accordingly, both the interior and the exterior of
the pipette will become contaminated with the fluid being dispensed.
In those situations where a pipette or the like is dedicated to
dispensing a single fluid, this contamination generally is not a problem.
Likewise, if cross-contamination between two or more fluids is not a concern
in the particular application for which the pipette is used, there is generally no
need to remove any previously dispensed fluid from the interior and exterior
of the pipette.
In many situations in which pipettes are used, though, cross-
contamination of fluids is a major concern. For example, in conducting
chemical analyses of medical samples, such as assays for a particular
constituent in a patient's blood, care must be taken not to introduce any of
the patients' samples into the reagent supplies or to intermingle one patient's
sample with that of another patient.
When manually processing such patient samples with pipettes, one will
commonly employ disposable pipette tips. These tips are typically thrown
away after they are used to aspirate and dispense a single patient sample,
effectively preventing cross-contamination of the different samples. In
automated analyzers of the type commonly used for clinical laboratory
analysis of such samples, though, disposable pipette tips generally are not

CA 02239974 l99X-01-14
WO 97/03766 PCT~US96/11644
deemed to be ~r~Lical and the pipette probes used in such analyzers must
typically be cleansed after each dispensing operation to maintain integrity of
both the patients' samples and the reagent supplies used to conduct the
tests.
A number of different approaches to washin~ pipette probes have been
developed. In each case, the function of the pipette washing apparatus is to
clean the pipette sufficiently to avoid any deleterious cross-contamination of
the fluids b2ing handled. In most cases, this means that the wash station
must efficiently and relatively thoroughly wash both the exterior and interior
surfaces of the probe to remove any contaminating fluids.
One common way to clean probes in automated pipettors is to
dispense a wash fluid through the pipette probe from a dedicated wash fluid
supply and to spray the outside of the probe with wash fluid supplied through
a separate washinç~ element. Contaminated wash fluid will typically be
withdrawn from a collectin~ cup positioned below the probe and transferred
to a waste fluid collector. This construction provides an efficient cleansing ofthe probe. Unfortunately, it also requires a relatively large volume of wash
fluid and requires separate pumping mechanisms and fluid supply systems for
both the pipette probe and the separate external washing hardware,
increasing both the cost and complexity of the device and generating more
biohazardous waste.
Another approach known in the art for cleansing pipette probes in
automated analyzers is to dispense wash fluid through the probe into a
relatively shallow receiving cup and to use the same fluid to rinse both the
interior and exterior surfaces of the probe. At first blush, this would appear
to provide a superior washing station in that only one wash fluid supply
system - i.e. the one connected to the probe - need be provided and it seems
that the quantity of wash fluid needed to cleanse the probe would be
minimized since the same fluid is used to wash the entire pipette.
In practice, however, this has proven to be a somewhat inefficient way
to cleanse pipette probes. The problem arises from the fact that the interior
of the pipette probe tends to carry the highest concentrations of

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
W O 97/03766 PCTAUS96/11644
contaminated fluids since the fluids being transferred are received in the
interior of the probe. When wash fluid is first passed through the probe, it
will carry with it the bulk of the contaminated fluid with it into the small
receiving cup and this contaminated fluid is flushed around the outside of the
5 probe. In order to cleanse the probe, one must pump further fluid through the
probe both to increase turbulence in the receiving cup and to dilute to
contaminated wash fluid with more fresh wash fluid. If low levels of possible
cross-contamination are required, as is the case for most automated chemical
analyzers used in the medical field, it takes a fair amount of wash fluid to~0 sufficiently clean the pipette probe and yield reliable results.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method for cleaning pipette probes
and the like and an apparatus for carrying out this method. In accordance
with the method, a pipette probe is positioned in or adjacent to a receiving
15 cup. Initially, fluid is dispensed through the probe and simultaneously drained
from the receiving cup at least as fast as it is dispensed into the cup. Once a
sufficient volume of fluid has been passed through the probe to remove the
majority of the contaminants from the interior of the probe, the flow rate is
increased or the rate of evacuation of fluid from the receiving cup is
20 decreased, or both, to build up a level of fluid in the receiving cup. This fluid
is allowed to contact and wash the exterior of the probe and fluid is desirably
continuously flushed through the probe until is has been sufficiently cleaned.
The apparatus of the invention provides a receiving cup having a drain
therein. In one embodiment, the drain is designed to remove fluid at a
25 relatively constant rate, such as by simply having an open port in the cup
through which spent wash fluid is allowed to pass under gravity. Wash fluid
is passed through the probe at an initial rate which is slow enough to allow allof the fluid to exit the receiving cup through the drain. After the majority of
the contaminant in the probe is dispensed into and drained out of the cup, the
30 flow rate of wash fluid through the probe is increased so that it is greater
than the rate at which it will drain from the cup. In this device, it may be
desirable to have a larger wash basin around the receiving cup to catch

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
WO 97~3766 PCTAUS96/11644
overflow from the receiving cup during the washing of the exterior of the
probe.
In another embodiment of the present apparatus, a selectively
controllable pump is attached to the drain in the receiving cup. Initially, the
pump will aspirate fluid from the receiving cup at least as rapidly as it is
dispensed. Once the majority of the contaminating fluid within the probe is
washed into the receiving cup and pumped out, the drainage rate of the pump
will be slowed to allow fluid to build up in the receiving cup and cover a
portion of the exterior of the probe to wash it. The pump is then operated to
withdraw fluid from the receiving cup rapidly enough to prevent it from
overflowing, but slowly enough to permit the exterior of the pump to be
washed. When washing is complete, flow through the probe may be
terminated and the remaining fluid in the receiving cup can be withdrawn
through the drain.
BRIEF DESCRIPTIOI~I OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic cross sectional view of a washing system in
accordance with the present invention; and
Figure 2 is a schematic cross sectional view of an alternative
embodiment of a washing system of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 schematically illustrates one embodiment of a washing system
10 in accordance with the present invention. The system includes a receiving
cup 20 positioned within a wash basin 30. The receiving cup 20 of Figure 1
has a generally cylindrical side wall 22 and a bottom 24, with a drain 26
positioned adjacent the bottom for draining fluid out of the receiving cup.
Although the drain may take any desired form, in the illustrated embodiment
the drain simply comprises a port which extends generally horizontally
through the wall 22 of the cup adjacent the lower end of the wall. This
permits any fluid within the receiving cup 20 to drain into the wash basin 30
for removal.
The wash basin 30 is desirably larger than the receiving cup. The
wash basin, not unlike the receiving cup, may have a generally cylindrical wall
,

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
WO 97/03766 PCT~US96/11644
32 and a bottom 34, with a drain 36 positioned adjacent the bottom to allow
fluid to be drained from the wash basin. The drain 36 of the wash basin is
desirably connected, e.g. by flexible tubing, to a waste container (not shown)
so that spent wash fluid can be collected to later disposal.
If so desired, the receiving cup can be positioned generally
concentrically with respect to the wash basin, but this is not necessary. It
may be desirable, though, to maintain at least some space between the wall
22 of the receiving cup and the wall 32 of the wash basin at all points so that
fluid overflowing from the receiving cup can flow into the wash basin without
fear of spilling over into other parts of the apparatus with which the wash
system 10 is used. In order to minimize any problems associated with
splashing of wash fluid out of the receiving cup 20, it may be advantageous
to have the wall 32 of the wash basin extend higher than the top of the wall
22 of the receiving cup, as shown.
The absolute and relative sizes of the receiving cup 20 and the wash
basin 30 can be varied to accommodate the equipment with which it is to be
used. In order to reduce the amount of wash fluid necessary to wash the
outside of a pipette probe 15 received in the receiving cup, the inner diameter
of the receiving cup is desirably relatively small. However, care should be
20 taken to ensure that there is enough clearance between the exterior of the
probe and the interior of the receiving cup to both allow turbulent flow within
the receiving cup and to avoid undue splashing of wash fluid out of the
receiving cup.
It may be desirable to position the probe 15 toward a side of the
25 receiving cup rather than having it aligned with the axis of the cup, as
illustrated in Figure 1. This tends to increase turbulence in the cup, further
aiding in washing the exterior of the pipette. Much the same effect could
also be achieved by changing the shape of the bottom 24 of the receiving
cup from the relatively flat shape shown in Figure 1 to either an irregular
30 shape or a shape which is asymmetrical with respect to the axis of the probe.As noted above, the wash basin is desirably larger than the receiving
cup. So long as the wash basin can readily capture and drain away the wash
-

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
WO 97/03766 PCT~US96/11644
fluid coming out of the receiving cup durinç1 the washinçl operation, though,
the relative sizes of these two components is not believed to be critical. For
example, if drainage of fluid from the wash basin through the drain 36 were
enhanced with a pump, the wash basin would not need to be larger than the
wash basin and, as a matter of fact, the wash basin could have a smaller ~,
volume than that of the receiving cup.
Figure 2 shows an alternative design of a washing system 10' in
accordance with the invention. This system 10' has a receiving cup 20
which is directly analogous to the receiving cup of Figure 1. However, this
design eliminates the wash basin and instead employs a pump 40 to control
the rate of drainage from the receiving cup during operation.
The pump 40 should be selectively controllable to allow an operator or
a computer-based automated controller (not shown) to control the pump and
the rate at which it removes fluid from the receiving cup. Although Figure 2
schematically shows a pump to be used for selectively controlling drainage of
the receiving cup, it should be understood that other functional equivalents of
a pump could instead be employed, such as providing a vacuum line with a
valve to control the rate of aspiration of fluid from the receiving cup. The
operation of the pump or aspiration line in a washing operation is described
below.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for washing
a fluid dispensing tube, such as a manual pipette or an automated pipette
probe used in an automated analyzer. Before the probe or other fluid
dispensing tube needs to be washed, it will generally be used to transfer a
fluid which raises a possible cross-contamination risk, such as a sample of a
patient's bodily fluid or a reagent used to carry out a specific chemical
reaction.
When such fluids are transferred or dispensed with a pipette or
automated pipette probe, the tip of the probe is usually inserted a relatively
short distance into a supply of the fluid to be transferred. Once at least the
tip of the pipette is immersed in the fluid, a predetermined quantity of the
fluid will be aspirated into the interior of the probe. The fluid will be held in

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
WO 97~3766 PCT~US96/11644
the probe until it is positioned over the vessel into which it is to be dispensed
and is then forced out of the interior of the tube. At the end of this transfer
process, some fluid will usually cling to or wet both the interior of the tube
and the exterior of the tube where it was immersed in the fluid.
Once a fluid has been transferred with a fluid dispensing tube, the tube
can be washed in accordance with the present invention, such as with a
washing system 10 or 10' described above. The probe or other dispensing
tube is positioned adjacent, and desirably within, a receiving cup 20. As
discussed above, it may be desirable to position the probe within the
receiving cup so that the probe axis is spaced away from the axis of the
generally cylindrical receiving cup to increase turbulence in the cup when
washing the exterior of the probe. A wash fluid is dispensed through the
pipette to flush contaminants from the interior of the tube and the
contaminated wash fluid is simultaneously drained from the receiving cup.
This draining desirably takes place at least as fast as the fluid is dispensed
from the probe.
Once a majority of the contaminants in the interior of the tube have
been removed, wash fluid is dispensed through the probe at a rate faster than
it is drained from the receiving cup so that the level of fluid in the cup will
rise to cover a portion of the exterior of the probe. In particular, the wash
fluid in the receiving cup in this stage of washing should be deep enough to
cover at least that length of the probe which was immersed in the
contaminating fluid. Wash fluid can then be delivered through the probe to
carry away, or at least greatly dilute, the contaminants in the cup and this
can be continued until the exterior and interior of the probe are as clean as
the system's requirements dictate.
The particulars of this method will vary somewhat on the nature of the
wash system employed to carry out the invention. If the wash system 10
shown in Figure 1 is used, the first, initial cleansing of the interior of the tube
desirably takes place at a relatively slow flow rate, while the second stage of
washing where the exterior is also cleaned takes place at a higher flow rate.
For example, the flow rate of wash fluid in the first stage of washing can be

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
WO 97/03766 PCTnUS96/11644
on the order of 400-450 microliters per second while the second stage of
washinçl ernploys a significantly faster flow rate, such as on the order of
1700-1800 rnicroliters per second. The exact flow rate employed in any
0iven situation will depend on a number of factors, including the dimensions
of the probe, the dimensions of the receiving cup, the viscosity and solubility
of the contaminant, and other factors which will be readily recognized by one
skilled in the art.
Employing two different flow rates in the wash system 10 of Figure 1
permits the present method of washing to be carried out without requiring
10 any complex equipment. In the first stage of washing at the lower flow rates,the fluid will drain out of the receiving cup through the drain 26 and simply
flow into the wash basin 30 for disposal. When the flow rate is increased
beyond the rate through which the fluid will exit through the drain 26, the
fluid level will inherently rise in the receiving cup. In a preferred embodiment,
15 the rate at which wash fluid flows through the probe is significantly higher
than the rate at which it can exit through the drain, causing the wash fluid to
flow over the top of the wall 22 of the receiving cup. If the flow rate and
dimensions of the receiving cup are properly chosen, this will also tend to
provide good turbulence in the receiving cup to help wash the exterior of the
20 probe.
If the washing system 10' of Figure 2 is instead employed, the rate at
which the fluid is drained by the pump 40 (or other functionally equivalent
component) can remain substantially constant and the wash fluid's flow rate
through the probe can be varied in much the same manner as that described
25 above for the system 10 of Figure 1. Care should be taken, however, not to
allow any of the contaminated wash fluid to spill out of the washing system
10'.
In a preferred embodiment, though, the washing system 10' is
operated somewhat differently, with the selectively controllable pump 40
30 controlling the rate at which waste fluid is drained and the pipette probe
delivering a relatively constant flow of wash fluid. In the first washing stage,the pump is operated so that the wash fluid is drained relatively rapidly,
-

CA 02239974 1998-01-14
W O 97/03766 PCTrUS96/11644
preventing the wash fluid from building up in the receiving cup and contacting
the exterior of the probe. Once a majority of the more concenllaLeJ fluid
from the interior of the probe has been flushed and drained through the drain
26, the rate at which the pump withdraws fluid can be reduced, or even
5 temporarily terminated, to allow fluid to build up in the receiving cup. The
pump can then be operated to withdraw fluid from the receiving cup at the
same rate at which it is delivered through the probe to prevent it from
overflowing.
Hence, the present invention provides an effective method and
10 apparatus for washing pipette probes and the like. This method and
apparatus are believed to simplify the equipment necessary to cleanse a
pipette probe and, at least in some circumstances, provide the possibility of
reducing the volume of wash fluid necessary to reach the necessary level of
cleaning.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-07-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2001-07-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-07-12
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-09-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-09-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-09-15
Classification Modified 1998-09-15
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1998-08-20
Application Received - PCT 1998-08-18
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-02-06

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-07-12

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 1999-07-02

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 1998-01-14
Basic national fee - standard 1998-01-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1998-07-13 1998-01-14
Registration of a document 1998-05-20
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 1999-07-12 1999-07-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS, INC.
BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
Past Owners on Record
ALAN WIRBISKY
DARCY LEONARD
KATHERINE M. HORSFALL
ROSS KROGH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1998-01-13 1 52
Description 1998-01-13 9 421
Drawings 1998-01-13 1 15
Claims 1998-01-13 2 82
Representative drawing 1998-09-15 1 5
Notice of National Entry 1998-08-19 1 209
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-08-19 1 140
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-08-19 1 140
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-08-19 1 140
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2000-08-08 1 184
PCT 1998-01-13 8 262