Language selection

Search

Patent 2240815 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2240815
(54) English Title: LOAD DISTRIBUTION PLATFORM
(54) French Title: PLATE-FORME DE REPARTITION DE LA CHARGE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E01D 15/12 (2006.01)
  • E02B 17/00 (2006.01)
  • E02D 27/01 (2006.01)
  • E02D 27/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MORISON, ALAN BRUCE (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ALAN BRUCE MORISON
(71) Applicants :
  • ALAN BRUCE MORISON (Canada)
(74) Agent: NATHAN V. WOODRUFFWOODRUFF, NATHAN V.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-03-08
(22) Filed Date: 1998-06-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-12-16
Examination requested: 1998-10-01
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A load distribution platform has a metal framework having a peripheral edge, a top and a bottom. The metal framework defines a plurality of openings. Each opening is bordered by an inwardly projecting peripheral top flange and an inwardly projecting peripheral bottom flange. Blocks are positioned in each of the openings confined by the peripheral top flange and peripheral bottom flange. It is preferred that the blocks be made of recycle vehicular tires.


French Abstract

Plateforme de répartition de charge, comprenant une ossature métallique ayant un bord périphérique, un sommet et une base. L'ossature périphérique définit une pluralité d'ouvertures. Chaque ouverture est délimitée par une bride périphérique supérieure en saillie vers l'intérieur et une bride périphérique inférieure en saillie vers l'intérieur. Des blocs sont positionnés dans chacune des ouvertures confinées par la bride périphérique supérieure et la bride périphérique inférieure. De préférence, les blocs sont constitués de pneus de recyclage.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


6
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A load distribution platform, comprising:
a metal framework having a peripheral edge, a top and a
bottom, the metal frame work defining a plurality of
openings, each opening being bordered by an inwardly
projecting peripheral top flange and an inwardly projecting
peripheral bottom flange; and
water and oil resistant blocks positioned in each of the
openings confined by the peripheral top flange and peripheral
bottom flange.
2. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein the blocks are made from recycled vehicular tires.
3. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein a pipe roll is welded to a portion of the peripheral
edge thereby facilitating loading and unloading of the metal
framework.
4. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein the openings are rectangular.
5. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein the metal framework is eight feet in width and forty
feet in length.
6. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein the openings are four feet in width and four feet in
length with six inches in depth between the top peripheral
flange and the bottom peripheral flange.
7. The load distribution platform as defined in Claim 1,
wherein the blocks have reinforcing rods extending
horizontally therethrough, the reinforcing rods being secured
to the metal framework.

7
8. A load distribution platform, comprising:
a metal framework having a peripheral edge, a top and a
bottom, the metal frame work defining a plurality of
rectangular openings, each rectangular opening being bordered
by an inwardly projecting peripheral top flange and an
inwardly projecting peripheral bottom flange; and
plinth-like blocks made from recycled vehicular tires
positioned in each of the rectangular openings confined by
the peripheral top flange and peripheral bottom flange, the
blocks having reinforcing rods extending horizontally
therethrough, the reinforcing rods being secured to the metal
framework.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02240815 1998-06-16
1
TITLE OF THE INVENTION:
load distribution platform
NAME ( S ) OF INVENTOR ( S )
Alan Bruce Morison
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a load distribution
platform.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There is a limit as to how much weight a ground surface
cannot withstand before the soil become unstable and subsides.
It has become a recognized practise to place a load
distribution platform under any object that is of such a weight
that it might adversely affect soil stability. The load
distribution platform distributes the weight of the object over
a large area so that the pounds per square inch acting upon the
ground surface is reduced to a level the soil can sustain
without subsiding.
In the oil industry, the load distribution platforms used
at remote drill sites have historically been made of wood.
These wood load distribution platforms have a number of
inherent disadvantages. Over prolonged usage the wood tends
to become saturated with water, oil or both. Water saturation
results in a deterioration and decomposition of the wood. Oil
saturation turns the load distribution platform into a
potential fire hazard. Either type of saturation increases the
weight of the load distribution platform when the time comes
to move it to the next drill site. Oil saturation can lead to
environmental contamination of any site where the load
distribution platform is positioned for any length of time.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
What is required is an alternative form of load

CA 02240815 1998-06-16
2
distribution platform.
According to the present invention there is provided a
load distribution platform, including a metal framework having
a peripheral edge, a top and a bottom. The metal framework
defines a plurality of openings. Each opening is bordered by
an inwardly projecting peripheral top flange and an inwardly
projecting peripheral bottom flange. Water and oil resistant
blocks are positioned in each of the openings confined by the
peripheral top flange and peripheral bottom flange.
Although there are other materials that would be suitable,
it is preferred that the blocks for the load distribution
platform described above be made from recycled vehicular tires .
Finding uses for recycled vehicular tires has been a matter of
serious environmental concern. Whether recycled vehicular
tires are used or other materials, the load distribution
platform described above provides numerous advantages over the
prior art. They are more durable than similar structures made
of wood. They are more resistant to and do not absorb either
water or oil. This means that they maintain a more constant
weight for transport and do not contaminate the site to which
they are moved.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of the invention will become more
apparent from the following description in which reference is
made to the appended drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is a top plan view of a load distribution
platform constructed in accordance with the teachings of the
present invention.
FIGURE 2 is a side elevation view, in section, of the load
distribution platform illustrated in FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 3 is side elevation view of a portion of the load
distribution platform illustrated in FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 4 is a detailed perspective view of as surface of
one of rubber blocks from the load distribution platform

CA 02240815 1998-06-16
3
illustrated in FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 5 is a top plan view, in section, of a portion of
the load distribution platform illustrated in FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 6 is side elevation view, in section, of one of the
rubber blocks from the load distribution platform illustrated
in FIGURE 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The preferred embodiment, a load distribution platform
generally identified by reference numeral 10, will now be
described with reference to FIGURES 1 through 6.
Referring to FIGURE 1, load distribution platform 10 has
a metal framework 12 made from structural steel. Metal
Framework 12 has a peripheral edge 14 and has cross members 16
which serve to divide metal framework 12 into a plurality of
openings 18. Referring to FIGURE 2, metal framework 12 has a
top 20 and a bottom 22. Each of openings 18 is bordered by an
inwardly projecting peripheral top flange 24 at top 20 and an
inwardly projecting peripheral bottom flange 26 at bottom 22.
Water and oil resistant blocks 28 made from recycled vehicular
tires are positioned in each of openings 18 confined by
peripheral top flange 24 and peripheral bottom flange 26.
Blocks 28 are preferably compressed into openings 18 using
hydraulic presses prior to peripheral bottom flange 26 being
welded in place. Peripheral bottom flange 26 is then welded
in place to prevent blocks 28 from being removed from openings
18.
While openings 18 can be made in a variety of shapes.
Rectangular openings are preferred, because it simplifies the
construction of metal framework 12. Although metal framework
can be made to virtually any dimension, the standard dimensions
currently in use are eight feet in width and forty feet in
length. Openings are preferably made either four feet in width
and four feet in length or four feet in width and eight feet
in length. The depth between top peripheral flange 24 and

CA 02240815 1998-06-16
4
bottom peripheral flange 26 is preferably six inches. Blocks
28 that fit into openings 18 are, rectangular and plinth-like.
Referring to FIGURE 3, it is preferred that a pipe roll
30 be welded to a portion of peripheral edge 14. Pipe roll
30 is used during loading and unloading of metal framework 12
onto trucks.
Referring to FIGURE 4, it is preferred that block 28 have
a plurality of dimples 32 to create a non-slip walking surface
33. Dimples 32, as illustrated, are intended to depict squares
two inches by two inches. It is also preferred that a fire
retardant chemical be added to the recycled vehicular tires at
the time of manufacture of blocks 28 to improve their fire
retardant properties. It is also preferred that luminescent
lines be placed on blocks 28 that are positioned at peripheral
edge 14 as a safety feature, to reduce the likelihood of a
person from inadvertently falling off load distribution
platform 10 at night. Blocks 28 provide a non-static surface.
Referring to FIGURE 6, it is preferred that reinforcement
rods 34 be moulded into blocks 28. Referring to FIGURE 5,
rods 34 are welded to metal framework 12 to reduce the
possibility of blocks 28 being pushed through openings 18 by
the weight of a load. Referring to FIGURE 6, it is also
preferred that blocks 28 be trimmed along peripheral edge 36,
so that when block 28 is fit into metal framework 12, non-slip
surface 33 is substantially flush with metal framework 12.
It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that
modifications may be made to the illustrated embodiment without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as
hereinafter defined in the Claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2013-06-18
Letter Sent 2013-06-17
Letter Sent 2012-06-18
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-29
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2011-05-31
Inactive: Office letter 2011-05-31
Inactive: Office letter 2011-05-31
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2011-05-31
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2008-08-08
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2008-08-08
Inactive: Late MF processed 2008-08-08
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2008-08-08
Letter Sent 2008-06-16
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Grant by Issuance 2005-03-08
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-03-07
Inactive: Office letter 2004-12-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-12-30
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-12-08
Letter Sent 2004-10-08
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2004-08-24
Pre-grant 2004-08-24
Withdraw from Allowance 2004-08-24
Final Fee Paid and Application Reinstated 2004-08-24
Reinstatement Request Received 2004-08-24
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-06-16
Deemed Abandoned - Conditions for Grant Determined Not Compliant 2004-01-19
Letter Sent 2003-07-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-07-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2003-07-17
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2003-07-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-05-28
Inactive: Correction to amendment 2003-05-21
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-04-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-12-27
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-10-12
Inactive: IPC removed 2001-10-12
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-10-12
Letter Sent 2000-08-28
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2000-08-11
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-06-16
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-12-16
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-12-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1999-01-25
Letter Sent 1998-12-10
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-10-26
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-10-26
Classification Modified 1998-10-26
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-10-26
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-10-26
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-10-01
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-10-01
Request for Examination Received 1998-10-01
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-08-27
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1998-08-27
Application Received - Regular National 1998-08-26
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 1998-06-16

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-08-24
2004-06-16
2004-01-19
2000-06-16

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-08-24

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 1998-06-16
Request for examination - small 1998-10-01
Reinstatement 2000-08-11
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2000-06-16 2000-08-11
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2001-06-18 2001-05-09
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2002-06-17 2002-06-07
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2003-06-16 2003-06-16
Final fee - small 2004-08-24
Reinstatement 2004-08-24
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2004-06-16 2004-08-24
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - small 2005-06-16 2005-04-27
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - small 2006-06-16 2006-05-30
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - small 2007-06-18 2007-03-26
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - small 2008-06-16 2008-08-08
Reversal of deemed expiry 2008-06-16 2008-08-08
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - small 2009-06-16 2008-08-08
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - small 2010-06-16 2010-06-10
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - small 2011-06-16 2011-06-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALAN BRUCE MORISON
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-11-30 1 7
Claims 2003-05-28 2 65
Cover Page 1999-11-30 1 28
Description 1998-06-16 4 175
Abstract 1998-06-16 1 13
Drawings 1998-06-16 4 39
Claims 1998-06-16 2 55
Representative drawing 2005-02-02 1 9
Cover Page 2005-02-02 1 34
Filing Certificate (English) 1998-08-27 1 174
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-12-10 1 177
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-02-17 1 113
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2000-07-17 1 184
Notice of Reinstatement 2000-08-28 1 170
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2003-07-17 1 160
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (NOA) 2004-03-29 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2004-08-11 1 175
Notice of Reinstatement 2004-10-08 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-07-28 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-07-28 1 171
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2008-08-26 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-07-30 1 170
Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-07-30 1 170
Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-07-29 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-07-29 1 171
Fees 2003-06-16 1 24
Fees 2002-06-07 1 24
Fees 2000-08-11 1 38
Fees 2004-08-24 1 40
Fees 2005-04-27 1 28
Fees 2006-05-30 1 25
Fees 2007-03-26 1 26
Fees 2008-08-08 2 69
Correspondence 2008-08-08 2 69
Fees 2008-08-08 2 73
Correspondence 2008-08-08 2 73
Correspondence 2011-03-31 3 154
Correspondence 2011-05-31 1 11
Correspondence 2011-05-31 1 19