Language selection

Search

Patent 2247109 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2247109
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR OXIDISING STARCH
(54) French Title: PROCESSUS D'OXYDATION D'AMIDON
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08B 31/18 (2006.01)
  • C08B 15/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SIVASLIGIL, DOGAN SAHIN
  • SLAGHEK, THEODOOR MAXIMILIAAN
  • DE WIT, DIRK
  • GOTLIEB, KORNELIS FESTER
  • JANSEN, REINIER JOSEF JOHANNES
  • VAN OVEREEM, HANS
(73) Owners :
  • KEMIRA CHEMICALS B.V.
(71) Applicants :
  • KEMIRA CHEMICALS B.V.
(74) Agent: MCCARTHY TETRAULT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1997-02-28
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-09-04
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/NL1997/000098
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1997031951
(85) National Entry: 1998-08-20

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
1002494 (Netherlands (Kingdom of the)) 1996-02-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process for reducing the viscosity of polysaccharides such as starch by
treatment with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of an acylated polysaccharide
as an activator is described. The acylated polysaccharide is used in
particular in an amount which is equivalent to at least 1 acyl group per 100
monosaccharide units. The hydrogen peroxide is preferably used at 2-20 wt.%,
with respect to the total of polysaccharide and acylated polysaccharide.


French Abstract

Cette invention concerne un processus permettant de diminuer la viscosité de polysaccharides tels que de l'amidon, lequel processus consiste à effectuer un traitement à l'aide de peroxyde d'hydrogène en présence d'un polysaccharide acylé utilisé en qualité d'activateur. Ce polysaccharide acylé est principalement utilisé dans une quantité équivalente à au moins un groupe acyle par centaine d'unités de monosaccharides. Le peroxyde d'hydrogène est de préférence utilisé selon une proportion allant de 2 à 20 % en poids par rapport au poids total de polysaccharide et de polysaccharide acylé.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. A process for reducing the viscosity of a polysaccharide by treatment with
hydrogen peroxide in the presence of an activator, characterised by using an
acylated polysaccharide as the activator.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein an amount of acylated
polysaccharide is used which is such that at least 1 acyl group is present for each 700
monosaccharide units of the total of polysaccharide and acylated polysaccharide.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein an amount of acylated polysaccharide
is used which is such that at least 1 acyl group, preferably at least 4 acyl
groups are present for each 100 monosaccharide units of the total of polysaccharide
and acylated polysaccharide.
4. A process according any one of claims to claim 1-3, wherein 2-20 wt.%
(0.1-1 mol eq.) of hydrogen peroxide, with respect to the total of polysaccharide and
acylated polysaccharide, is used.
5. A process according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein the polysaccharide
is starch, especially potato, corn, waxy maize, tapioca, wheat or rice starch.
6. A process according to any one of claims 1-5, wherein the acylated
polysaccharide is a derivative of the same polysaccharide to be treated.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the acylated carbohydrate is
prepared in situ.
8. A process according to any one of claims 1-7, wherein an average of
0.06-0.2 acylated monosaccharide unit is present per monosaccharide in the total of
polysaccharide and acylated polysaccharide.
9. A process according to any one of claims 1-8, wherein the polysaccharide
is treated at a concentration of 10-50 % by weight.
10. A process according to any one of claims 1-9, wherein the treatment is
carried out at a pH between 5 and 11.

11. A process according to claim 10. wherein the treatment comprises a
stage wherein a pH between 5 and 8.5 is used, and a subsequent stage wherein a pH
between 8.5 and 11 is used.
12. A process according to any one of claims 1-11, wherein the polysaccharide
is starch and the treatment is carried out at a temperature between 40°C
and 5°C below the starch pasting temperature in particular between 40 and 60°C.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02247109 1998-08-20
W O 97/319Sl 1 PCT~NL97/00~98
Process for o~iidising starch
The present im ention relates to a process for reducing the ~,iscosit~ of
pol~saccharides, especiall~ starch, b~ o~;idati~c degradation ~ithout meta~ catal~sts.
Starch is economicall~ relc~-ant both as a foodstuff and for non-food
applications. Worldwidc thc annual starch production is about ''6 million tons. One
of the largest non-food uscrs of starch deri~ati~es is the paper industr~. In this fie~d
starch solutions with high starch content ( '5 v~t.'~") and lo~ ~iscosities are much
desired. Important features of starch dcri~ati~es arc an impro~-cd initial wet strength
of the papcr sheet, a bettcr printabilit~, a bcttcr rctention of cationic additi~-es and
o applicabilit~ as glue. Thc dcmand for thcsc starch dcri~ati~es is sc~-eral million tons
a ~,~ear.
Starch has to be subjcctcd to a ~ iscosit~-rcducing treatment, before it can be
used on an industrial scalc. For this purpose. thc starch is gcnerall~ treated
oxidati~ el~ in an al~alinc medium at incrcascd tcmperaturc (40-60~C). This
treatment takes ~-15 hours at about 60~C, for e~;amplc in casc h~pochlorite is used
as an o~idisiDg agcnt togethcr ~ith sulphuric acid or phosphoric acid. Disad~antages
of this method are the amount of salt produccd in addition to chlorine-containing
deri~ ati~ es, and a high proportion of short chain starch moleculcs. Thcse dis-ad~antages are becoming morc and more important as thcre is an incrcasin~ demandfor chlorine-free product.
According to anothcr mcthod, h~ drogcll pcro~;idc is uscd togcthcr with a
transition metal as a catal) st. Ho~c~ cr. it is difficult to climinate the, oftcn
poisonous, catal~st aftcrwards, C~CIl ~rhcn USillg compounds such as EDTA. Another
disad~antage is the discoloration of the product.
2s US-A-5,36''.868 discloses a proccss ~hcrcill thc ~iscosit~ of (h!dro~eth~l)
starch is reduccd b~ o~idation using a peracid at pH's ranging from I to 6 and at 40-
50~C. For e~;amplc, pcrox~ sulphuric acid (H,SO ,) or pcracetic acid are used asperacid. Thc perox~sulphuric acid has to bc prcparccl in situ from h~drogcn pcro~;ide
and sulphuric acid~ or elsc a salt of thc acid has to be used, which has thc
disad~ antage of gcncrating salts as l ~ products. The reacti~ it~ of peracctic acid is
lo~er and results in longcr rcaction timcs. It is also dcscribcd in US-A-5,36'',868,
,! . . . . ~ .

~ - - CA 02247109 1998-08-20
~0 U~
that the reactio~l with hy~og~ peroxide results in unacccpta~le reactio~ tlmes.
~rencll p~te~t 87814~ scs thc trC~ttncnt of sta~ch with pera~tic acid at 111~~C,vvhich gi~ves a bctt~r Yiscc~sity reduction than trcatm~nt wi~h sodium pero~Idc, but
results ~n thc starch to be simultancously p~Lst~d.
s Accordi~g to l~E-A-4035053, cellulosic rn~teri~ts su~h a~ ~ottOn caI~ bc
hC~;l b~ tr~ating th~ t~ri~l~ with pcrac~tic a~id without activators~ ~nd
simulta~cously subjecti~2~ th:m to a~ ultrasonic trsatmc~t (33 ~kHz).
~JS 5,342,542 ~licclosps thc us~ of sucrose l~ ct~s for i~creasiIIg thc
ble~chin~ cff;c y of perborate in tex~i1e w~sh".g.
~4 obje~t of thc inYen~On is ~o plo~d~ a proc~ss for re~lucing the viscosity
of st~rch and other polysaccha~ides with simpl¢ mcans, without thc us~ of hcavy
me~als a.~d sal~-produ~ ag~ts, and with~ut orgar~ by-pl~duct. It ~s also an
obj~t to providc a ~iscosity--rcducing pro~~~ss whicJ~ allows thc s~arc.h g~anu1c to
rcmai~ intact, for casicr workin~, dryin~ handli~g ~ 'hc pro~u~:t
This obj~ct i~ a¢hicvcd by means of a pr~c~ss wherein t~c polys~c~h~ri~ is
oxi~iscd u.,i~g hydrogcn pcroxid~ in thc prcs~c~ of an acylatcd polys~eh~nclc c~s a~
activator.
As a polysacchariclc which can ~e trcat~d u~hl~; thc proccss of thc i~cnti~n,
any wholl~ of pa~tially water--solublc polysac~har~dc can be used. I~scsc con~prise
2n firstly st~rch ~c.~. po~to, corn, wasy mai~c, tapIoca, wh~at, ricc and other starcllcs~
a~d fractions and d~,;va,ti-~,s thcrcof, such as amylosc5 floc ~els, ctho~ylated starrh
a~d carb~xymethyl starc~. Furthelmor~, thc solubility of ~el11rlase ~l~iv~liY~s a~d
inulin and de~ivatives th~co~ an~ p~nt~s~nc such as xylans call be i...yl~lv,_~ o~ th~ir
~~isco~ity can be recluccd with the proces~ s~f thc invcn~io~. CarbohydMte ~rivatnes,
~5 su~ N-~ylatc7~ lated, carboxymethylatcd, alXyIatcd, hydroxy~l}cSrlate~3,
u~ellated and dehy~ro~n~tcd de~ivati~es can also be treated accor~n~ to ~hc
i~entic~n.
The acylated carbohydrate use~l as a catalyst ~an be a~y palysacchaJide which
i~ wholly cr paI~ally acylated. It w~s found tllat only a small ~moun~ of a~ylated
30 carbohydrate is n~c~ h~y to ensur~ an ~ffl~i~nt rç~k~n- r~ ~s often sui~ficie~t if for
each 700 anhyd~lucose (or other lu~ f~2l~ide) ~t~, one aeyiated mnnl~s~rc~h~de
urut i~ prescr~t~ Preferably at lc~st one and e~pec~ally It least ~our monoacyl~t~d
Jno~ rh~ridc units are pr~se~t for ~ach laO uni~s. I~ particular an av~ra_e of
0.06~)2 acyl~ted m~losa~ dc ullits ~s pr~s&nt pcr m~ ch~ idc unit in th~
ElYL~Ei~ S.~cET

CA 02247109 l99X-08-20
WO 97/31951 PCT~L97/00~98
total of non-ac~ lated and ac~ latcd pol~ saccharidc. Thc term "ac~lated" comprises
alkano~ lated (form~ lated acet~ latcd propion~ latcd~ etc.) benzo~-lated sulphatated
phosphor~latcd etc
The ac~lated carboh~drate Call sin~pl~ bc obtailled b~ treatment of a carbo-
h~drate with an ac~ lating a~cnt such as acctic anh~ dride USillg standard methods.
Some ac~-lated carboh~dratcs are commcrciall)~ a~.lilal71c such as acet~l starch having
a DS of about ''.5% or 8~.
An ad~antage of thc usc of an ac~latccl carhoh~drate is that the oxidation
reaction proceeds smoothl~ and no undesircd h! -products arc formed; the ac~ lated
0 pol~ saccharidc or its o~;idation product can bc part of the treatcd pol~saccharide
product without an~ incon~elliellce.
The ac~lated carboh~dratc can ad~antaleousl~ be a derivative of the same
carboh~ drate to be ~rcatcd. Thus thc trcatment of starch can suitablc bc pcrformed
using acet~lated starch as thc activator. Thc ac~ latcd carhoh~drate can be prepared in
situ e.g. b~ ac~lation ~ith ~he corre.sponding carl?o~51ic anh~dride at pH 8-9.5 in a
concentrated solution or SUSpcllSiOIl of thc calholl~dratc. Thc ac~lation ma~ then be
followed bs the oxidation but oxidation ma~ also l c startcd during ac!~lation.
The amount of h~dro_cn peroxidc to I c uscd is cntircl! depcndent Oll the
desired de~rec of oxidatioll. An amount of I w t.C~ is sufficicnt in general forachic~ ing an effecti~ c ~ iscosit~ clcgrcc. Acl~ antaPcouxl~ t.%~ in particular ~-
'~0 wt.~o of h~drogen pcroxidc is uscd. with rcfcrcllcc to thc total of pol!saccharide
and ac~lated carboh~drate. The h~dro~cll pcro~;idc can hc addcd at once but it has
been found that bctter products arc obtaincd ~hcll thc h~drogcn peroxide is addcd
graduall~ or in portions for cxamplc over a pcriod from 5 minutcs to 3 hours.
The reaction can bc pcrformccl at room tcmperaturc~ but prefcrabl~ at
incrcased temperaturc gencrall! from ~n to gnoe. in particular from 40~C to 5~C
below the pasting tempcraturc~ wllich pastin~ tcmpcrature is at about 6~~C for most
starch t~ pcs. This results in a ~ iscosit! -rcducccl product still having a granular
structure. The rcaction timc is from scvcral minutcs to se~ eral hours at that
temperaturc dcpcndin_ on thc palticular pol~ saccll.lride and thc desired dc_ree of
viscosit~ reduction.
Thc pol~saccharidc is prcfcral-l! trcatcci at a rclati~cl~ high conccntratio

CA 02247109 1998-08-20
W O 97/31951 4 PCTANL97/00098
such as 10-55 wt.Yo, in particular 33-5(3 ~, b~ ci~ht. Thc treatmcnt is carried out
under neutral to alkaline conditions~ i.e. at a pH bct~eell S and 1~?, espcciall~
between 8 and 11, in particular bctweell ~ and 11. Thc treatment can ad~-antagcously
be carried out in two or morc sta~es! i.e. addition of pcro~;idc at neutral pH ~5--8.5)
s and subsequent reaction at all;alinc pH (8.:~-11). In casc of in situ ac~ lation, the
ac~lation can be performed undcr slightl~ alk.~ le conditions (pH 7.5-9.5~, during or
after ac~lation pcroxide is addcd ~ith somc pH dccrea~c (e.g. pH 6-8.5) and
oxidation is completed at hi~her pH (~.:~-11).
The product obtaincd b~ thc process of thc in~cntioll is esscntiall~ frce of
0 chlorinc (as salt or co~alcntl~ bound~ i.c. not al-o~c natural abundance (< ''0 ppm)
and of transition metals. Thc carbox~l contcnt is prcfcral~ls bctween 0,'? and 5,
especiall~ between 0.~ and 3 ~t.~. Thc ~ iscosit~ is prcfcrabl~ belo~ 4000
Brabender units (at ''~ ~.t% dr~ sul?stancc ancl at~O~C) and in particular bclo~ 1000
Brabender units.
Example 1
Oxidation of StQrc~z U'i~l H~()? it~ t~te prcsenc ~ of (lc(~ (Jf~d .~r~lrc~l
To a stirrcd suspension of nati~ c potato st.lrch (70() ~) and Pcrfectam) l AC
(commerciall~ a~ailablc acct~latcd starch. acct~lation DS ~", 3no g) in watcr (1 1)
at 4S~C and pH 7 ~A~aS addcd H O~ (3() ~t.~ () ml = ahout 0.3 mol.cq.). Thc pH
was slo~l~ raised to pH 10.5 usin~ n.s M sodiulll h!droxidc (v~ithin 30 minutes) and
was thcn held constant for thc rcmaindcr of thc rcaction time (total reaction time 3
hours). At the end of the rcaction thc pH of thc rcaction mi~;turc v~as slo~l) adjusted
to pH 6 ~ith concentratcd sulphuric acid (9~ ~t.~,). Thc rcaction mi~;turc was then
filtered and the modificd starch ~as ~ashcd witll ~atcr (. 1, room tempcraturc~, after
2s which it ~as dricd. Thc rhcological propcrtics ~cre dctcrmincd v.rith a Brabender
Viskograph E. Thc results arc gi~ en bclo~ in Bral?clldcr units at ~noc; V5 mcans
~iscosit~ at 5 ~t.~o.
V5top V5~alle~ V~cncl ~' V ~alle) V~~ end
75 < 5 70 1~)7()() ?~00 X
The end ~ iscosities could bc lo~-crcd solllc~ t 1~ a) incrcasin~ thc pH to 1 1 ; b)
increasing the amount of H~O: c) adding thc H,O gradu;~ in 7-1n minutcs at pH

CA 02247109 1998-08-20
W O 97/31951 5 PCT~NL97/00098
8. A strong further ~ iscosit~ reduction v.-as obtained b~ increasing the ratio of
acet~lated starch to native starch.
B ~ wa of comparison the expcrimcnt was rcpcatcd using 85 g of galactose-penta-
acetate instead of Pcrfectam~l u~hich resultcd in and end iscosit~ V5 of 11~0.
5 Example 2
To a stirred suspension of Pcrfcctam~rl AC (acct~ latcd starch acetylation DS 8%100~ g) in water (1 I) at 50~C and pH In.S was added H~O2 (30 wt.% 400 ml =
about 0.6 mol.eq.) in 70 portions o~er 1 hour using ~ M sodium h~droxide. After 3
hours another 0. mol.eq was addcd at con..tant pH of 1().5 (total reaction time 4
10 hours). The reaction mixturc was worl;cd-up a-.. in E~;amplc 1. The carbo~;~l contcnt
was dctermined b~! titration. Thc iscosit data arc giVCIl below:
V-Stop V allc! V~~end %COOH
0.6 cq H O 3 0 ~ 0~0 1.4
O.g eq H 0? 10t) ~0 180 1.6
Example 3
lS Oxi~tion of stQrc~ it~l H~O, ar~ sit~ ccttl~t~ .starc~l
To a stirred suspcnsion of nati e potato starch (~5() g) in v~atcr ( 50 ml) at 5~C and
pH 8-9.5 acetic anh dride (AA ~ g = ~7 molc 70 ().~1~ ml.min~~ as slowl v
added in 3 hours. 5 ml of 30 wt.~o H~O~ as acldcd during acet~lation. The DS foracet lation was 1 l~o. Subscqucntl~ thc tcmpcratul-c was raised to 50~C at pH 7.20 Threc portions of 5 ml H O~ wcrc thcn addcd in 1 hour (total amount about 0.6mol eq.). The pH was slowl~ raiscd to pH 1 n.s using 1 .t) M of sodium h~ droxide
(within 30 minutcs) and ~A~as thcn hcld constallt for thc remainder of the rcaction time
(total rcaction timc 3 hours). Thc rcaction mixtul-c ~as ~or~ied up as in Example 1.
The rcsults are gi en belov~-.
molc5o AA YoCOOH V~top V-~vallc~ V-~ end
7 1 .9 7: ~() 3 100
Comparative Example
To a slurr~ of starcll (7t) g dr ~cigllt in 13t3 g water: 35 ~t.%) g of
glucosc penta-acctate is addcd at ~t)~C. Thcll a solution of 10 ml h~dro~cn pcroxidc

CA 02247109 1998-08-20
W O 97131951 6 PCT~NL97/00098
(30 wt.%) is addcd at once. Thc pH is lov~crcd to 1.~ using 1 N aqueous h~dro-
chloric acid. After a reaction timc bcl ~ecn I~ millutcs and 6 hours the reaction
mixture is neutralised and the o~idised starch is scparated b~ filtration washed with
watcr en dried ~A~ith acctone. Tl e iscosit~ of a suspcllsion of q0 g of product in 380
5 ml of water is dctermined USill~ a Brabcndcr -iscosimcter.
Table 1 summarises thc rcsults of thc product aftcr 3 hours and after 6
hours. Thc result of the trcatment using onl h!dro~cn pero~idc aftcr 3 hours is also
gi~-en for comparison.
Tal le l
Viscosit~ of starch at 5 ~t.~ drS su~?stance~ after oxidation
Oxidant Rcaction Initial Top Top End
time (h) tcmp. tcmp.~iscosit~~iscosit~
(~C~I (~C)q 71~ ~4
none (blanc) - ~)l 8() 3 00 1180
HqOq 3 ~~ 8-> 1560 500
H O~ + GluAc 3 6~ 7~ 5~ ?0
15HqO + GluAc~ >~)() 5()() ~0
1 Initial temperature of Brabcldcr cur~c
2 Temperature of the top of the Bral?clldcr cur c
3 Brabendcr units at top of Brabcndcr cur c: 7~ rpnl. tcmp. ~radicnt:
1.5~C/min. tSIa~ ~0~C t~ 9()~C hold: 3() mim: AVEB~ standard 0191
20 ~ Brabcnder units in ~allc of Brabcndcr cur c (as 3)

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2247109 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2002-02-28
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2002-02-28
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-02-28
Inactive: Single transfer 1998-12-17
Classification Modified 1998-11-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-11-27
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-11-27
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1998-11-03
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1998-10-27
Application Received - PCT 1998-10-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-09-04

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-02-28

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-01-05

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1999-03-01 1998-08-20
Registration of a document 1998-08-20
Basic national fee - standard 1998-08-20
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2000-02-28 2000-01-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KEMIRA CHEMICALS B.V.
Past Owners on Record
DIRK DE WIT
DOGAN SAHIN SIVASLIGIL
HANS VAN OVEREEM
KORNELIS FESTER GOTLIEB
REINIER JOSEF JOHANNES JANSEN
THEODOOR MAXIMILIAAN SLAGHEK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1998-08-20 1 47
Description 1998-08-20 6 286
Claims 1998-08-20 2 54
Cover Page 1998-12-03 1 36
Notice of National Entry 1998-10-27 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-02-02 1 115
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-03-28 1 182
Reminder - Request for Examination 2001-10-30 1 118
PCT 1998-08-20 13 482
Correspondence 1998-11-03 1 31
Fees 2000-01-05 1 37