Language selection

Search

Patent 2253225 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2253225
(54) English Title: ON-SITE PIPE COATING PROCESS
(54) French Title: PROCESSUS DE REVETEMENT DE TUYAUX SUR PLACE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B05D 07/14 (2006.01)
  • B05D 01/38 (2006.01)
  • B05D 07/00 (2006.01)
  • F16L 58/02 (2006.01)
  • F16L 58/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • GIBSON, MARK W. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • KEMACOAT INTERNATIONAL INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • KEMACOAT INTERNATIONAL INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2001-01-30
(22) Filed Date: 1998-11-10
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-09-27
Examination requested: 1999-07-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A pipe treatment process that is a portable, field-applied,
coating process. The process produces a two-layer composite protective
coating system with a finished, seamless, chemical bond within its
interlayers as well as to adjacent coating materials. The process is suitable
for metallic substrates, which may or may not be cathodically protected, and
maybe used to coat new or repair previously coated metallic substrates.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12~
CLAIMS:
1. A method for repair of a defective section of a protective
coating on the exterior of a metal pipeline in the field, comprising:
(a) stripping a portion of said protective coating from said pipeline,
said portion including the defective section of the protective coating;
(b) forming a clean metal surface on said portion of the pipeline;
(c) applying an undercoat of at least 5 mil of liquid polyepoxide or
polyurethane composition to said clean metal surface, said composition
having a curing agent for said polyepoxide or polyurethane;
(d) optionally applying a non-melted, powder layer of a
thermoplastic polyolefin selected from ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid
copolymers and polyolefins modified with functional ethylenically
unsaturated carboxylic acid groups or derivatives by means of forced air
onto the entire surface of the undercoat and onto the protective coating
adjacent thereto;
(e) allowing the undercoat to cure until the coating exhibits no flow
when a stream of heated air is applied; and
(f) applying a topcoat of at least 5 mil of a thermoplastic polyolefin
selected from ethylenel(meth)acrylic acid copolymers and polyolefins
modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid groups, or
derivative thereof, onto said undercoat, by contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto with said thermoplastic polyolefin in a
non-melted state, the pipeline being at a temperature such that the
polyolefin melts and undergoes melt flow on contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto.
2. The method of Claim 1 in which the undercoat is also applied
over the protective coating immediately adjacent to said clean metal surface.
3. The method of Claim 1 or Claim 2 in which the pipeline is
heated prior to application of the topcoat of (f).

13
4. The method of Claim 1 or Claim 2 in which the pipeline is
heated after application of the topcoat of (f).
5. The method of any one of Claim 1-3 in which the layer of (d) is
applied.
6. The method of any one of Claim 1-3 in which the layer of (d) is
not applied.
7. The method of any one of Claim 1-6 in which the section of the
pipeline with the clean metal surface is heated prior to application of the
undercoat.
8. The method of any one of Claim 1-7 in which the pipeline is
being used for the conveying of fluids at the time said repair is being
effected.
9. The method of any one of Claim 1-8 in which the clean metal
surface is formed by sand blasting the portion of the metal pipeline from
which the protective coating has been stripped.
10. The method of any one of Claim 1-9 in which the defective
section is a minor section of the pipeline.
11. The method of any one of Claim 1-10 in which the overcoat of
(f) is a powder.
12. The method of any one of Claim 1-10 in which the overcoat of
(f) is a film.
13. The method of any one of Claim 1-10 in which the overcoat of

14
(f) is a tape.
14. The method of any one of Claim 1-13 in which the undercoat
and topcoat have thicknesses in the range of 5-40 mils.
15. The method of Claim 14 in which the undercoat and topcoat
have thicknesses in the range of 10-20 mils.
16. The method of any one of Claim 1-15 in which the undercoat is
polyepoxide and the coating is applied at a temperature of at least
10°C.
17. The method of any one of Claim 1-15 in which the undercoat is
polyurethane and the coating is applied at a temperature of at least -
20°C.
18. The method of any one of Claim 1-17 in which the time
between application of the undercoat and application of the topcoat is 4-24
hours.
19. The method of any one of Claim 1-18 in which the
thermoplastic polyolefin is a modified polyolefin.
20. The method of any one of Claim 1-18 in which the
thermoplastic polyolefin is an ethylene/acrylic acid copolymer.
21. A method for application of an exterior protective coating on a
minor section of a metal pipeline, comprising:
(a) providing a clean metal surface;
(b) applying an undercoat of at least 5 mil of liquid polyepoxide or
polyurethane composition to said clean metal surface, said composition
having a curing agent for said polyepoxide or polyurethane;
(c) optionally applying a non-melted, powder layer of a
thermoplastic polyolefin selected from ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid

15
copolymers and polyolefins modified with functional ethylenically
unsaturated carboxylic acid groups or derivatives by means of forced air
onto the surface of the undercoat and onto the protective coating adjacent
thereto;
(d) allowing the undercoat to cure until the coating exhibits no flow
when a stream of heated air is applied; and
(e) applying a topcoat of at least 5 mil of a thermoplastic polyolefin
selected from ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymers and polyolefins
modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid groups, or
derivative thereof, onto said undercoat, by contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto with said thermoplastic polyolefin in a
non-melted state, the pipeline being at a temperature such that the
polyolefin melts and undergoes melt flow on contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto.
22. The method of Claim 21 in which the pipeline is heated prior to
application of the topcoat of (e).
23. The method of Claim 21 in which the pipeline is heated after
application of the topcoat of (e).

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02253225 1998-11-10
TITLE
ON-SITE PIPE COATING PROCESS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates a method for repair of a defective
section of a protective coating on the exterior of a metal pipeline. The
method is carried out in the field and may be carried out on an operating
pipeline.
Background of the Invention
It is common practice to coat sections of new pipelines off-site in a
pipe manufacturing operation or at a site other than in-line on the pipeline,
to
protect the pipeline from corrosion or mechanical damage. It is important for
the long term protection of the pipeline that all sections of the pipeline
have
a viable coating.
Pipeline coatings invariably became damaged or defective, as a
result of damage during installation, movement of rocks or other abrasive
materials in the ground e.g. due to settling of soil or freeze/thaw cycles in
certain areas, or aging of the coatings.
A wide variety of portable field-applied coatings are in use to recoat
previously coated, and partially protected, aged metallic substrates e.g. in
service steel pipeline fittings and assemblies and steel lined pipe. Such
aged substrates are normally coated with e.g. mill-applied fusion bonded
epoxy powder, extruded bitumen/polyethylene tape wraps, heat-shrink
sleeves, two-part liquid epoxies applied by brush, by roller or by airless
spray equipment; and modified liquid urethanes which are also applied
either by brush, by roller or by airless spray equipment.
While each of these field-applied coatings is useful in certain
applications, there are compatibility and pertormance limitations on both
new and aged metallic substrates. Moreover, in situ coating repairs are
difficult or impossible to accomplish in a manner that re-coats the pipeline
with the coating originally applied to the pipe in a plant site.
Fusion bonded epoxy powders generally exhibit excellent adhesion
and excellent cathodic disbandment properties. However, these coatings
tend to be brittle and prone to handling damage and to display high moisture
permeation. The coatings are useful as a new coating on metallic

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
2
substrates, but generally are not chemically compatible with other coatings
such as extruded plastics and plastic film. This excludes them from use with
such dissimilar coated surfaces. For instance, fusion bonded epoxy
powders, by themselves, are not compatible or reliable coatings with two or
three layer, mill-coated composites as found on new steel line pipe.
Thermoset coatings, which include two-part liquid epoxy and two-part
liquid urethanes, generally exhibit excellent adhesion and cathodic
disbandment properties. However, these coatings also tend to be brittle and
prone to handling damage and to display high moisture permeation.
Thermoset coatings work well as either a new or recoat coating when the
already-applied coating is also a thermoset material or a fusion bonded
epoxy powder. However, they are not chemically compatible with other
coatings such as extruded plastics and plastic films, and tend not be usable
with such dissimilar coated surfaces. Thermoset coatings, by themselves,
generally are not reliable with two or three layer mill-coated composites as
found on new steel line pipe.
Tape wraps and heat-shrink sleeves show a much lower adhesion to
metal substrates and to other coatings, when compared to thermoset
materials. Consequently, they do not withstand attacks from soil stress and
soil loads, common situations for buried metal pipe. Tapes and sleeves also
leave a visible seam with the underlying substrate, which is susceptible to
adhesive failure. Adhesive failure can provide a path through which moisture
and other contaminants can migrate to undermine the integrity of the
remaining bond and attack the underlying substrate.
An example of a method for repairing a coating in the field using a
thermospray process is described in U.S. Patent 5 792 518.
Summary of the Invention
Aspects of the present invention provide a new portable and field-
applied, coating process that produces a two layer composite, protective
coating with a finished, seamless bond between its interlayers and to other
adjacent coating materials and which may be used to coat new or to recoat
previously coated, cathodically protected or not, metallic substrates, without
using a thermospray process.
Accordingly, an aspect of the present invention provides a method for
repair of a defective section of a protective coating on the exterior of a
metal

CA 02253225 2000-02-08
3
pipeline in the field, comprising:
(a) stripping a portion of said protective coating from said pipeline,
said portion including the defective section of the protective coating;
(b) forming a clean metal surface on said portion of the pipeline;
(c) applying an undercoat of at least 5 mil of liquid polyepoxide or
polyurethane composition to said clean metal surface, said composition
having a curing agent for said polyepoxide or polyurethane;
(d) optionally applying a non-melted, powder layer of a
thermoplastic polyolefin selected from ethylenel(meth)acrylic acid copolymers
and polyolefins modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic
acid groups or derivatives by means of forced air onto the entire surface of
the undercoat and onto the protective coating adjacent thereto;
(e) allowing the undercoat to cure until the coating exhibits no flow
when a stream of heated air is applied; and
(f) applying a topcoat of at least 5 mil of a thermoplastic polyolefin
selected from ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymers and polyolefins
modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid groups, or
derivative thereof, onto said undercoat, by contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto with said thermoplastic polyolefin in a
non-
melted state, the pipeline being at a temperature such that the polyolefin
melts and undergoes melt flow on contacting the undercoat and protective
coating adjacent thereto.
The present invention further provides a method for application of an
exterior protective coating on a minor section of a metal pipeline,
comprising:
(a) providing a clean metal surface;
(b) applying an undercoat of at least 5 mil of liquid polyepoxide or
polyurethane composition to said clean metal surface, said composition
having a curing agent for said polyepoxide or polyurethane;
(c) optionally applying a non-melted, powder layer of a

CA 02253225 2000-02-08
3a
thermoplastic polyolefin selected from ethylenel(meth)acrylic acid copolymers
and polyolefins modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic
acid groups or derivatives by means of forced air onto the surface of the
undercoat and onto the protective coating adjacent thereto;

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
4
(d) allowing the undercoat to cure until the coating exhibits no flow
when a stream of heated air is applied; and
(e) applying a topcoat of at least 5 mil of a thermoplastic polyolefin
selected from ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymers and polyolefins
modified with functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid groups, or
derivative thereof, onto said undercoat, by contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto with said thermoplastic polyolefin in a
non-melted state, the pipeline being at a temperature such that the
polyolefin melts and undergoes melt flow on contacting the undercoat and
protective coating adjacent thereto.
The preferred embodiment of the methods, the thermoplastic
polyolefin is in the form of a powder, film or tape.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention will now be described with reference to the
embodiments shown in the drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of the layers of a coating
applied to a pipeline;
FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of portion of pipe having a
girth weld around its circumference and having a coat by a process of the
present invention;
FIG 3. shows a schematic representation of the pipe of FIG. 2
partially coated during the coating process;
FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of pipe having a longitudinal
weld;
FIG. 5 shows schematic representation of the pipe of FIG. 4 partially
coated during the coating process.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The method of the present invention is a portable, field applied
method. It is understood that the method is intended for use in the field i.e.
on existing, installed pipelines, which may or may not be operating at the
time the method is used. Suitable removal of soil or the like from around the
pipeline is required, as will be understood by persons skilled in the art.
The nature of the bond between the thermosetting polymer viz. liquid
polyepoxide or polyurethane composition, and functionalized thermoplastic

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
polyolefin in powdered form appears to be an intermingling of undercoat
and top coat materials to form a blended material which might be described
as a "plastic material composite". In a preferred embodiment discussed
below, an additional step is taken to form plastic materials composites.
5 Functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is described herein and is a
ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymer or polyolefin modified with functional
ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid groups, or derivative thereof
The undercoat, which is adherent to the metal surface, may be
applied by brushing, spraying or rolling and may form a mechanical and/or
chemical bond with the pipe profile.
The metal surface may be a partially exposed surface of a previously
coated metal pipe or may be a clean surface of an unused manufactured
line pipe. When these pipes or articles have been previously coated with
continuous coatings or wrappings and the inventive coating of the invention
is to be utilized in a previously coated area, it is necessary to clean the
previous coating from a discrete area to be coated accordingly to the
invention. For example, if a defect occurs in a coating of a previously
coated pipe, it is necessary to clean the previous coating away from the pipe
in the region of its defect, and the~immediately surrounding area. The
inventive coating may then be applied, firstly the layer of liquid
thermosetting
polymer onto the exposed metal, and secondly, the functionalized
thermoplastic polyolefin, optionally with the additional powder layer
discussed herein.
If the functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is applied in the form of a
powder, the powder is applied at ambient temperature or with minimal
heating. The heat to form the layer of molten polymer on the pipe is
provided by the pipe. Thus, the polyolefin does not melt until contact with
the undercoat and protective coating adjacent thereto on the pipe.
However, the functionalized polyolefin must undergo melt flow on contact
with the undercoat and the existing and remaining adjacent protective
coating.
Similarly, if the functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is applied in
another form e.g. a film or tape, the film or tape is applied at ambient
temperature or with minimal heating. The heat to form the layer of molten
polymer on the pipe is provided by the pipe.
The pipe would normally be heated immediately prior to contact of the

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
6
functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin with the pipe. Any convenient means
of heating the pipe may be used, examples of which are infra red and
induction heating. It is understood however that the heating could be
applied after the functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is applied,
especially
if the functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is in the form of a film or
tape.
Fig. 1 shows a metal surface 10 coated according to the invention.
The coating comprises an undercoat 12 of thermosetting polymer, obtained
from a liquid polyurethane or polyepoxide, and a topcoat (overcoat) 14 of
functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin, e.g. a modified polyethylene or
polypropylene or ethylene/acrylic acid copolymer. Intermediate layer 15 of
plastics material composite is shown between the topcoat 14 and the
undercoat 12. It is believed that intermediate layer 14 may be formed when
topcoat 14 is applied to undercoat 12. However, intermediate layer 15 may
be formed in a separate step. As discussed herein with reference to
application of an additional optional layer, it is further understood that the
layers of undercoat 12, topcoat 14 and intermediate layer 15 will, to a
significant extent, not be separate and distinct layers but rather show a
transition in composition between undercoat 12 and topcoat 14.
It should be understood that the thickness of the undercoat,
intermediate layer and topcoat shown in FIG. 1 and elsewhere are not to
scale.
FIG. 2 shows a length of pipe 20 having a girth weld 16 adjoining
adjacent pipe lengths. It will be appreciated that while FIG. 2 illustrates a
weld 16, the present invention will be equally applicable to any type of join
between two pipes or to joins between pipe lengths and a T-junction for a
reducer or an elbow or the like. Moreover, the process of the invention
might equally be applied to any weakened area of the pipe coating and the
description with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 2 would equally apply to
any such weakened area.
When pipe 20 that has already been provided with a conventional
coating is initially laid or when it is uncovered for rehabilitation or
repair, it
may be treated by the process of the invention. One embodiment of such a
process will now be described.
The welded pipes, 20, are thoroughly cleaned in the region of weld 16
and outbacks 18 located on each side of weld 15. Cleaning may be by
sandblasting or by other conventional means. The level of cleaning may be

CA 02253225 1999-10-20
7
SSPCSP2 (simple wire brushing) up to SPS, SPS or SPIO (SPIO is
sandblasting) to remove as much as 4 mils of existing metal surface, It is
understood that a section of existing coating may have to be removed,
especially where it is believed to be defective, to provide a clean surface
where a repair is required. For a new pipeline, less cleaning may be
required. It is understood that chromium, zinc or other metal treatments may
be applied to the pipe after cleaning but prior to application of liquid
undercoats.
After cleaning of cutback 18 and weld 16 between lengths of pipe,
which itself is coated with coating 17 except in the area of the cutback and
the weld, the cleaned section of pipe is coated with undercoat 12 of liquid
thermosetting polymer which will adhere to the metal surface of the pipe and
may also blend with the subsequently applied topcoat 14 (partially shown in
Fig. 3) of thermoplastic polyolefin. The coating 12 may be applied by
brushing, spraying or rolling liquid over the cutback 18 and weld 16. Topcoat
14 may be applied by any of the various methods described herein.
The thermosetting polymer may be a liquid polyepoxide or a
polyurethane composition. The thermosetting polymer is applied as a liquid,
in a thickness of at least 5 mils, e.g. 5-40 mils, especially 10-20 mils, at
ambient temperature. It is not necessary to heat the pipe, although this may
be done. If the liquid coating is a polyepoxide, it is preferred that the
ambient
temperature be at least 1000. If the liquid coating is a polyurethane, it is
preferred that the ambient temperature be at least -20°C. After
application of
the liquid polyepoxide or polyurethane, the resultant undercoat is permitted
to cure to an extent that there is no flow of the coating when a stream of hot
air is applied. It is understood that when no flow of the coating is
exhibited,
application of heat may result in further curing of the undercoat, and even
burning of the undercoat.
The time required for sufficient curing of the undercoat depends on
the ambient temperature, but typically takes 4-24 hours. This is convenient
for operation of the process, as it eliminates the need to apply a topcoat
immediately. A pipeline at ambient temperature also facilitates this, although
a low amount of heat may be applied to the pipeline.
Examples of polyepoxides include KEMAT"" 500 as manufactured by
Kemacoat International Inc., PROTAT""L 5900 as manufactured by Denso
North America, and SPOT"" 2888 as manufactured by Specialty Polymer

CA 02253225 1999-10-20
Coatings.
Examples of polyurethanes include VALPIPET"~ 100 as manufactured
by the Valspar Corporation. KEMA T""100 as manufactured by Kemacoat
International Inc., and PROTEGOLT"", manufactured in West Germany.
It is understood that both the polyepoxide and polyurethane
composition as applied to the pipe will contain a curing agent, as is known
for such compositions.
When the undercoat has reached the no-flow condition discussed
above, the overcoat is applied.
The overcoat may be applied in the form of a powder at ambient
temperature or with minimal heating. For instance, the powder may be blown
onto the pipe in a stream of air. However, the pipe must be heated to a
temperature such that the powder will melt on contact with the pipe and
undergo melt flow thereon. Methods of heating are discussed herein.
Alternatively, the overcoat of functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin is in
another form e.g. a film or tape, which would be wound or otherwise applied
to the pipe. In some circumstances, it might be preferred to apply the
polyolefin in the form of a patch.
The heating of the pipeline may be immediately prior to application of
the functionalized thermoplastic polyolefin or subsequent to that application.
The preferred method may depend on the form of the functionalized
thermoplastic polyolefin.
The polyolefin coating is applied in a thickness of at least 5 mils, e.g.
5-40 mils, especially 10-20 mils, onto the undercoat 12 and the adjacent
existing protective coating 17. It is preferred that the pipe be at a
temperature such that the polyolefin becomes molten, and moreover melt
flows on contact with the undercoat. The temperature required depends on
the particular polyolefin, but does not need to be measured as the
acceptability of the applied topcoat is determined by noting the melt flow of
the polymer. It is understood that excess temperatures that degrade the
topcoat should be avoided.
The functionalized polyolefin may be a polyolefin modified (grafted)
with the functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid or derivative
thereof, or the polyolefin may be formed from olefin monomers that have
been copolymerized with the functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic
acid. In embodiments, the polyolefin may be a thermoplastic polyolefin

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
9
modified with at least one ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid, or
derivative thereof, especially an anhydride or ester thereof. Examples of
such functional ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids include malefic
acid, malefic anhydride and acrylic acid. Examples of polyolefins that may
be grafted include polyethylene, polypropylene, or propylene with other
monomers e.g. acrylic or methacrylic acid and esters, carbon monoxide and
the like, with which a preferred grafting monomer is malefic anhydride.
Examples of copolymers include ethylene/acrylic acid copolymers (EAA) and
ethylenemethacrylic acid.
FIGS. 4 and 5 shows a longitudinal weld treated in the same manner
as that described for the girth weld of FIGS. 2 and 3. Similar reference
numerals refer to similar parts. Pipe coating 17, which in this case is a tape
wrap, is cleaned away from the longitudinal weld 19 and a two step coating
according to the invention is applied.
Although the plastic material composite may be formed in situ by the
method discussed above, it may also be formed as an additional,
intermediate, step in the process. After the liquid undercoat has been
applied, powdered polyolefin may be applied. This is also carried out at
ambient temperature, and is akin to a dusting procedure. On application of
the powdered polyolefin, the powder becomes occluded in the coating, but
excess powder falls from the coating and does not adhere or otherwise
combine with the undercoat, hence the analogy to a dusting procedure.
While the powdered polyolefin so applied may be different from that of the
undercoat, it is conveniently the same powdered polyolefin as subsequently
applied.
The method of the present invention may be applied for repair of a
pipeline having a wide variety of defects, including separation of the
existing
coating from the pipeline, physical damage to the existing coating and
cathodic disbondment of the existing coating. The method may also be
used for applying an original coating to a section of pipeline.
The method of the invention is a portable, field- applied, coating
process. It is simple and economic in operation, and utilizes relatively
inexpensive and less bulky equipment for application of the coatings. As
such, it is well suited for field application, including in remote areas where
other equipment could not be readily located. Moreover, the process can
frequently be utilized on an operating pipeline i.e. it is frequently

CA 02253225 1998-11-10
unnecessary to cease operations of the pipeline in order to utilize the
process of the invention to repair the pipeline.
The method of the present invention provides protection that is
believed to be equivalent to that using a thermospray, as disclosed in U.S.
5 5,792,518, but offers the advantages of not requiring use of a thermospray,
of alternate heating methods and of application of different forms of a
coating.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2004-11-10
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2004-01-20
Letter Sent 2003-11-10
Grant by Issuance 2001-01-30
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-01-29
Pre-grant 2000-10-24
Inactive: Final fee received 2000-10-24
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-04-27
Letter Sent 2000-04-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2000-04-27
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2000-04-13
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-02-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 1999-12-06
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-11-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1999-10-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-09-27
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-09-26
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 1999-08-19
Inactive: CPC assigned 1999-08-04
Inactive: CPC assigned 1999-08-04
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1999-07-28
Letter sent 1999-07-28
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - paragraph 84(1)(a) of the Patent Rules 1999-07-28
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) 1999-07-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-07-14
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) fee processed 1999-07-14
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-07-14
Request for Examination Received 1999-07-14
Inactive: Single transfer 1999-01-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-01-08
Classification Modified 1999-01-08
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-01-08
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-01-08
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-01-08
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1998-12-29
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1998-12-21
Application Received - Regular National 1998-12-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-10-24

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 1998-11-10
Registration of a document 1999-01-20
Advanced Examination 1999-07-14
Request for examination - small 1999-07-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2000-11-10 2000-10-24
Final fee - small 2000-10-24
MF (patent, 3rd anniv.) - small 2001-11-12 2001-10-22
MF (patent, 4th anniv.) - small 2002-11-11 2002-07-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KEMACOAT INTERNATIONAL INC.
Past Owners on Record
MARK W. GIBSON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1999-10-19 10 526
Abstract 1998-11-09 1 13
Description 2000-02-07 11 527
Claims 2000-02-07 4 131
Description 1998-11-09 10 527
Claims 1998-11-09 3 122
Drawings 1998-11-09 3 44
Representative drawing 1999-09-19 1 5
Representative drawing 2001-01-04 1 5
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-02-18 1 114
Filing Certificate (English) 1998-12-20 1 163
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2000-04-26 1 164
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-07-10 1 109
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-01-04 1 174
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-01-04 1 174
Correspondence 2000-10-23 1 51
Fees 2001-10-21 1 49
Correspondence 1998-12-28 1 30
Correspondence 2004-01-04 6 370
Fees 2002-07-15 1 52
Fees 2000-10-23 1 51