Language selection

Search

Patent 2256246 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2256246
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR THE MEMBRANE FILTERING OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FILTRATION SUR MEMBRANE DE SOLUTIONS DE PROTEINES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

Sorry, the abstracts for patent document number 2256246 were not found.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

Sorry, the claims for patent document number 2256246 were not found.
Text is not available for all patent documents. The current dates of coverage are on the Currency of Information  page

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02256246 1998-12-18
1 ) TITLE OF THE INVENTION
Process for The Membrane Filtering of Protein Solutions
2) BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
i) Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a process for the treatment of protein solutions.
ii) Description of The Prior Art
Whey proteins are commonly concentrated through the use of
ultrafiltration.However,
attempts to utilize membranes in processes which require the protein to
permeate through
the membrane (e.g., microfiltration (MF) for bacterial removal or selective
fractionation
of proteins by ultrafiltration (UF) have been less successful. Standard
organic membranes
in spiral or flat sheet format exhibit soiling which may be partially due to
the formation
of a secondary membrane layer resulting in the rejection of proteins sized
well below the
molecular weight cut off (MWCO) for that membrane. For example, beta-
lactoglobulin
(MW: 18,000) which exists as a dimer in whey (MW: 36,000) exhibits significant
rejection on membranes with much higher MWCO including even MF membranes. This
fact has been used as the basis for concentrating beta-lactoglobulin relative
to alpha
lactalbumin (MW: 14,000) (see U.S. Patent No. 5,008,374) .
The problem of protein rejection can be controlled in tubular membrane systems
through the use of inorganic membranes employing high product recirculation
rates and
and the possible inclusion of the cocurrent circulation of permeate.This
approach is
characterized by low effeciency and high capital and operating costs. It is
also limited to
microfiltration applications.
3) SL>Z~Y OF THE INVENTION
i) Aims of the Invention
Consequently, since the above-described processes are not completely
successful, it is
the object of this invention to provide a process for the treatment of
proteins involving
the use of the full selection of organic and inorganic membranes available and
is
applicable in both OF and MF.
Another object of this invention is to provide a process for the fractionation
of
individual proteins in milk generally or in whey protein solutions in
particular.
Yet another object of this invention is the provision of a process for the
removal of
lipids and/or bacteria from milk generally or from whey protein solutions in
particular.

CA 02256246 1998-12-18
2
ii) Statement of Invention
The present invention is based on the discovery that, by utilizing a system
that applies a
low tangential velocity at the surface of the membrane and low transmembrane
pressure,
permeation of protein sizes down to the approximate molecular weight cut-off
of the
membrane can be achieved. In other words, the present invention provides an
improvement in a process for the membrane filtration of a protein solution.
Thus, the present invention provides a process for the membrane fractionation
of
protein solutions which comprises applying a low pressure and tangential
velocity at the
surface of the membrane, whereby permeation through the membrane of protein
sizes
down to a pre-selected molecular weight cut-off of the membrane is achieved.
iii) Other Features of The Invention
By one feature of the invention, the protein solution is milk, whey,
concentrated whey or
a purified solution of whey proteins. In one variant of such feature, one or
more proteins
of higher molecular weight are rejected, which lower molecular weight proteins
pass
through the membranes. By one facet of that feature of the invention, the
higher
molecular weight proteins are immunoglobulin and/or bovine serum albumin
proteins,and
the lower molecular weight proteins are beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-
lactalbumin, which
are allowed to pass into the permeate. By another facet of that feature of the
invention the
higher molecular weight protein is beta-lactoglobulin, and the lower molecular
weight
protein is alpha lactalbumin, which is allowed to pass into the permeate. By
another facet
of that feature of the invention the higher molecular weight protein is
phosphocasein and
the lower molecular weight proteins are immunoglobulin,bovine serum
albumin,beta-
lactoglobulin, and alpha lactalbumin proteins.
In another such feature of the invention, the permeate is subjected to at
least one of
further concentration and diafiltration steps to produce a milk or whey
protein isolate
containing greater than 90% protein on a dry basis.
By another feature of the invention, the membrane has a pore size which is
selected to
remove bacteria but will allow substantially all protein to pass through the
membrane.
By a further feature of the invention, the membrane has a pore size which is
selected to
remove residual lipid material,but to allow substantially all protein to pass
through the
membrane.
In other facets of these features of the invention, the resulting concentrates
are dried to
produce individual milk or whey protein fractions, or the permeates are
further
concentrated and dried to produce individual milk or whey protein fractions.

CA 02256246 1998-12-18
3
iv) Generalized Description of the Invention.
The process conditions are most effectively applied by passing a protein
solution
through a membrane pack ( Pall Corporation Cassette Systems, North Carolina
SRT
Cross Flow filter modules, Millipore Prostak membrane module) with a channel
height
greater than O. Smm, a tangential velocity of less than 3.0 meters a second
and a
transmembrane pressure of less than 10 psi.
Accordingly, this invention provides a process for the membrane filtration of
protein
solutions.Such process uses standard flat sheet membrane materials. The
proteins in the
solution of sizes down to the approximate molecular weight cut-off of the
membrane are
able to cross the membrane and may be recovered in the permeate solution
without any
significant rejection of these proteins.
4) DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF TIC INVENTION
The following are examples of the present invention.
Example 1
4 liters of cooled whey protein concentrate (43%) were recirculated through an
ultrafiltration holder ( known by the trdemark North Carolina SRT OPTISEP ) at
a flow
rate of 2.0 U. S. gallons per minute with the temperature maintained at less
than 60
degrees F. The transmembrane pressure was maintained at 6 psi.This unit was
equipped
with 0.2 square feet of 500,000 MWCO PVDF membrane. Permeate was recombined
with the feed to maintain a constant volume and the test was carried out for a
period of 5
hours. Samples were taken for protein analysis every hour and flux
measurements were
taken throughout the run.
Analysis for Bovine serum albumin, alpha lactalbumin, and beta lactoglobulin
revealed
no significant rejection over the course of the test. Bacteria and lipid
removal were shown
to be greater than 99% and the flux remained constant at 1 lml/min for the
duration.

CA 02256246 1998-12-18
4
Example 2
2 liters of defatted protein solution were circulated through an
ultrafiltration holder
( known by the trademark North Carolina SRT OPTISEP ) at a flow rate of 1.9 U.
S.
gallons per minute with the temperature maintained at less than 60 degrees F.
The
transmembrane pressure was maintained at 4 psi. This unit was equipped with
0.2 square
feet of 30,000 MWCO RC membrane. Permeate was recombined with the feed to
maintain a constant volume and the test was carried out over a period of 4
hours. Samples
were taken for protein analysis every hour and flux measurements were taken
throughout
the run. Analysis for beta lactoglobulin and alpha lactalbumin revealed
significant
rejection for the beta lactoglobulin and no significant rejection of the alpha
lactalbumin.
The flux remained constant at 22 ml per minute for the duration.
CONCLUSION
Thus, by the present invention, a process is provided which is particularly
effective with
whey protein solutions and may be used for the removal of bacteria or lipids
or for the
fractionation of individual proteins.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2256246 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Dead - Application incomplete 2001-07-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-07-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-12-18
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Notice Requiring a Translation 2000-07-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-07-12
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-06-18
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-06-18
Inactive: Incomplete 2000-04-12
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-02-05
Classification Modified 1999-02-05
Classification Modified 1999-02-05
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-02-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-02-05
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-02-05
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1999-01-22
Application Received - Regular National 1999-01-21

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-12-18
2000-07-12

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 1998-12-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALAN M. JONES
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2000-06-17 1 2
Abstract 2000-06-17 1 2
Description 1998-12-17 4 196
Filing Certificate (English) 1999-01-21 1 163
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (incomplete) 2000-08-01 1 171
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2000-09-18 1 119
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-01-14 1 183
Second Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2001-06-18 1 119
Correspondence 2000-04-11 1 11
Correspondence 1999-01-25 1 32