Language selection

Search

Patent 2260066 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2260066
(54) English Title: PARTICLE FILTER IN THE FORM OF A PLEATED NONWOVEN LAYER
(54) French Title: FILTRE ANTIPARTICULES SOUS LA FORME D'UNE COUCHE DE NON-TISSE PLISSE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 46/52 (2006.01)
  • B01D 39/08 (2006.01)
  • B01D 39/16 (2006.01)
  • D04H 03/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • JUNG, REINHARD (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • IREMA-FILTER GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • IREMA-FILTER GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-07-18
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1997-07-10
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1998-01-22
Examination requested: 2001-11-30
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1997/003657
(87) International Publication Number: EP1997003657
(85) National Entry: 1999-01-08

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
196 28 184.9 (Germany) 1996-07-12

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a filter arrangement comprising
a pleated nonwoven layer for use as a motor vehicle interior
filter. The nonwoven layer is in the form of a single-layer,
self-supporting micro-spunbonded fabric, the grammage thereof
being between 70 g/m2 and 200 g/m2, preferably between 110
g/m2 and 150 g/m2, the thickness thereof being between 0.7
and 1.5 mm, and the fibre thickness being between 2 and
20 µm with an average fibre thickness of 3 to 5 µm.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un ensemble filtre comprenant une couche de non-tissé plissé, destiné à être utilisé comme filtre pour l'espace intérieur d'un véhicule automobile. Cette couche de non-tissé se présente sous la forme d'une seule couche de tissu micro-spunbonded autoportante, dont le grammage est compris entre 70 g/m<2> et 200 g/m<2>, de préférence entre 110 g/m<2> et 150 g/m<2>, dont l'épaisseur est comprise entre 0,7 et 1,5 mm, et dont l'épaisseur des fibres est comprise entre 2 et 20 mu m, l'épaisseur moyenne des fibres allant de 3 à 5 mu m.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege
is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A filter arrangement comprising a pleated non-woven layer, wherein the non-
woven layer is a single-layer, self supporting micro-spunbonded fabric having
a
weight per unit area of from 70 g/m2 to 200 g/m2 and a thickness which ranges
from
0.7 to 1.5 mm, and wherein the thickness of the fibers ranges from 2 to 20
µm with an
average fiber thickness of 3 to 5 µm.
2. A filter arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the micro-spunbonded
fabric has a higher fiber density on the flow-off side than on the flow-in
side.
3. A filter arrangement according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the micro-
spunbonded
fabric is a pure-grade fabric made from polypropylene, polyester or
polycarbonate.
4. A filter arrangement comprising a pleated non-woven single layer having a
thickness of 0.7 to 1.5 mm, and formed from self-supporting micro-spunbonded
fabric having a weight per unit area of 70 g/m2 to 200 g/m2 and in which the
thickness
of the fibers ranges from 2 to 20 µm with an average fiber thickness of 3
to 5 µm, the
micro-spunbonded fabric including core fibers having a thickness of 10 to 33
µm.
5. A filter arrangement according to claim 4 wherein the individual
microfibers
have a thickness of 1 to 3 µm.
6. A filter arrangement according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the micro-
spunbonded
fabric has a higher fiber density on its downstream side than on its upstream
side, and
the fabric is made entirely of polypropylene, polyester or polycarbonate.
7. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the
micro-
spunbonded fabric is a fabric which has been subjected to ultrasound.

10
8. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the
micro-
spunbonded fabric is a fabric which has been compressed by calendering.
9. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 8, having a
structure
such that an initial pressure loss is less than 50 Pa at a velocity of flow
through the
filter arrangement of less than 250 m3/min/m2.
10. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the
non-
woven layer is located in a flat filter box, and the material of its frame or
an adhesive
consists of the same material as the non-woven layer.
11. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the
pleated non-woven layer has pleat heights ranging from 10 mm to 100 mm.
12. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the
fibers
of the non-woven layer are curled and random on the flow-in side, and are
placed in
substantially lengthwise alignment on the flow-off side.
13. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the
weight per unit area is from 110 g/m2 to 150 g/m2.
14. A filter arrangement according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the
fabric
is made from polypropylene.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02260066 1999-O1-08
Particle Filter in the Form of a Pleated Non-woven Layer
The invention relates to a particle filter in the form of a pleated non-woven
layer. Filters of the generic type are used for instance as ambient air
filters,
and in particular as motor vehicle interior filters. During the manufacture of
filters of the generic type, a material disposed in layers is pleated, i.e. it
is
arranged in concertina-type pleats, the distance of these pleats from each
other being customarily fixed by a marginal strip glued on or by clamping
in a frame. A filter of this design is then itself inserted for replacement in
a
filter frame.
Conventionally, various designs are available for the filtration of motor
vehicle interior air:
On the one hand non-woven staple fibers are known, the pleatability of
which is attained by a meshed support sheet for example of polypropylene.
On the other hand there are so-called meltblowns which are placed on
spunbonded fabrics or paper carriers and are united with same by ultrasonic
spots or hot-melt adhesive spots.
The only type of filter which, in this field, does without any supporting
layer is the so-called grit mat which is however flat and non-pleated or
non-pleatable when inserted into the filter receptacle.
All the filter materials that have to be pleated have in common that they
must exhibit a certain rigidity of their own in order for them to maintain
their pleated design when employed in practice, which is why convention-
CONFIRMATION COPY

CA 02260066 1999-O1-08
-2-
ally these non-wovens are laminated, i.e. they are combined with support
layers.
The meltblowns and non-woven staple fibers mentioned either have too
little substance or they are too soft to ensure by themselves proper and du-
rable pleating.
Using support layers results in that, in as much as the cost ef~'ectiveness
ratio is concerned, the costs of a spunbonded fabric for meltblown support
can amount to as much as 70 % of the total cost of the composite. The costs
of a meshed sheet for the support of non-woven staple fibers amount to as
much as 20 %, the total cost being considerably higher than in the case of
the design mentioned above.
The support components are of use exclusively in the sense of mechanical
stabilization, whereas they are substantially useless from the point of view
of filtering technology. Spunbonded fabrics only can retain particles in the
range of > 5 p.m, which is why they are designated as prefilters. However,
particles of this size deposit before reaching the heating or conditioning
chamber for instance of a motor vehicle. Furthermore, a serious drawback
resides in that any addition of non-woven or meshed sheet is always ac-
companied with an increased pressure drop of the entire laminated com-
posite, which may amount to as much as 30 %.
This is an important aspect since today's motor vehicles have an accurately
calculated energy distribution system. Only restricted quantities of energy
are available to the range of heating/venting/conditioning. The costs of ve-
hicle components are allowed to range only within a close compass. On the

CA 02260066 1999-O1-08
-3-
other hand the demands of motor vehicle buyers for equipment conven-
ience and safety are getting higher and higher. From these aspects, particle
filters of as low a pressure drop as possible are of special importance, low
pressure implying a ventilated motor of small dimensions and, therefore,
correspondingly low energy consumption. Furthermore, low differential
pressure also means little noise of the fan for the throughput of certain
quantities of air in the vehicle and consequently increased convenience of
driving.
The demand for filter systems of low differential pressure competes with
the requested filtration capacity and requested service life, i.e. the time in
terms of mileage, for which a filter may remain in a vehicle before it must
be replaced.
Pollen filters which only filter pollen from the air streaming into a vehicle
are of little help to allergic persons. The allergens which the immune sys-
tem of these persons reacts to are proteins, the diameter of which is only a
fraction of the pollen diameter. They are in the range of 0.1 Vim, i.e. in the
most problematic range for particle filters, the so-called MPPS (most pene-
tracing particle size). Consequently, solutions that are to be of some use to
allergic persons must have a filtration capacity of at least 50 %, this filtra-
tion capacity being measured by means of an aerosol, the particles of which
have approximately the same density, for example NaCI. Incorporating fil-
ters of this type in motor vehicles is intended to attain a service life of
30,000 kilometers.
In theory it would be possible to produce non-woven staple fiber and melt-
blown fabrics in such a way that they have sufficient rigidity of their own,

CA 02260066 2005-O1-06
thus being pleatable. However, it must be taken into consideration that for
non-woven
staple fiber fabrics stabilization takes place either thermally or by binders,
it being
necessary in the former case to accept a comparatively high differential
pressure and
in the latter case to accept very high emission rates. On the other hand, in
order for
meltblown fabrics to be rendered sufficiently stable to be used for instance
in a motor
vehicle interior filter box, a grammage or weight per unit area of more than
130 g/m2
would have to be attained. The diameter of a meltblown fiber is in the range
of
approximately 2pm. Given the grammage and fiber diameter, a non-acceptable
differential pressure has to be expected.
It is an object of the invention to embody a filter arrangement of the type
mentioned
at the outset so that it will combine cost-efficient producibility and
processibility with
a low differential pressure and a long service life.
According to the invention, this object is attained by a single-layer, self
supporting
micro-spunbonded fabric being used as a non-woven material, the grammage
(weight
per unit area) of which ranges from 70 g/m2 to 200 g/m2, preferably from 110
to 150
g/mz, the thickness from 0.7 to 1.5 mm and the fiber thickness from 2 to 20~.m
with
an average fiber thickness of 3 to S~.m.
By advantage, it is provided that the non-woven material has a higher fiber
density on
the flow-off side than on the flow-in side, and that the non-woven material is
a pure-
grade fabric made from PP (polypropylene) or PES (polyester) or PC
(polycarbonate).
The invention also, but not exclusively, relates to the use of a filter
arrangement of
this type as a filter, in particular for motor vehicle interior air.
Details of the invention will become apparent from the ensuing description, in
conjunction with the drawings, in which:

CA 02260066 2005-O1-06
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of the principle of formation of varying
fiber
thicknesses in the case of spun-bonded fibers manufactured according to the
micro
spunbonding method;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of the fiber arrangement in the non-
woven on the
flow-off side;
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of the fiber arrangement in the non-
woven on the
flow-in side; and
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic perspective illustration of a filter arrangement
comprising a
pleated non-woven according to the invention in a frame.
FIG. 1 illustrates the fiber arrangement as created during the spunbonding
process
and as utilized for the filter arrangement according to the invention. It is
to be seen
that on the one hand a "core" of thick fibers of a thickness of 10 to 33 gm is
provided
and that on the other hand individual salient fiber ends only have a thickness
of 1 to 3
Vim.
The manufacture of a micro-spunbonded fabric of the type under regard is
described
in detail in DE 41 23 122 A1. Surprisingly, it has been found that, while the
requested
parameters are observed, a manufacturing technique of this type will create a
non-
woven layer which, even without lining and without a supporting layer, will
have a
sufficient rigidity of its own for it to be pleated. A special advantage
resides in that
the inherent rigidity is virtually isotropic, i.e. the same flexural rigidity
is attained in
every direction of the non-woven. This may be due to the fact that on the one
hand a
non-woven layer of the type under regard has a fiber thickness of 3 to 5 ~.m,
which
conditions the excellent filter properties, but on the other hand also thicker
fibers of
up to 20 pm are available which form a type of a natural support structure
without, as
opposed to the lined support layers of the prior art, negatively affecting the
filter
properties, in particular in the sense of an increase of the differential
pressure.
Especially favorable properties can be attained by subsequent ultrasonic
treatment

CA 02260066 2005-O1-06
6
and calendering. The lower fiber density and higher roughness on the flow-in
side
help attain that arriving particles are reliably retained, whereas the higher
fiber
density and lower roughness on the flow-off side ensure that no particles
reach the
range of the filtered air. In the manufacturing process which is typical for
micro-
spunbonded fabrics, this design can be put into practice in that the side of
the non-
woven on which the non-woven is deposited during manufacture is employed as a
flow-off side when the fabric is inserted in the filter.
Details of the invention will become apparent from the ensuing description of
a
preferred embodiment as compared to background art filter material. Such a
prior art
filter material is commercially available for instance under the trademark
HeIsatech
8504.
Backt~a-ound Art Exemplary Embodiment
C~rammage in g/m2: 100 130
Thickness in mm: 0.8 1.0
Fiber thickness in stn: approx. 3 2 - 20 (higher fiber
thicknesses are obtained
by fiber bunching)
Fiber orientation: random lengthwise of the sheet
on the flow-off side,
random on the flow-in
side
Fiber structure: three-layer laminate, progressive:
varying fiber density high fiber density on
of the individual flow-off side, low fiber
layers density on flow-in side

CA 02260066 2005-O1-06
7
Fiber material: PP/PES PP
Flexural rigidity:
(Schlenker process,
DIN 53864) in cN/cm= lengthwise 9.6 lengthwise=crosswise 26.7
crosswise 12.2
The fibers are comparatively hot when deposited under pressure so that
they bond together and a rigid pleatable mat originates.
Series Material Micro-Spunbond
Comparison Measurements Background Art acc. to Example
Pressure drop at 3.8 m3/min 60 Pa 40 Pa
(flow-in surface 0.06 m2)
Filtration capacity using NaCI 50 % 50
with 0.3 - 0.5 ~m of particle diameter
Pressure drop at a volume flow 300 Pa 80 Pa
of 3.8 m'/min (flow-in surface 0.06 m2)
after aging on an aging test distance,
actuated by 50,000 m3 of road air
on a much-used road
Fogging value (condensate value) < 5 mg/g < 0.5 mg/g
Combustion rate acc, to MVSS 302 30 mm/min no combustion
(DIN 75200)
Number of layers in 3 1
the filtering medium
Material components PP / PES PP
Operating temperature -40 - 100°C -40 - 100°C

CA 02260066 2005-O1-06
As opposed to a prior art filter, a filter according to the invention excels
additionally
by an improved service life without the filtration capacity being affected.
A comparison of FIGS. 2 and 3 shows that the fibers are aligned lengthwise on
the
flow-off side, correspondingly having a comparatively high fiber density,
whereas
FIG. 3 shows that the fibers are deposited randomly on the flow-in side,
correspondingly having a Iow density.
FIG. 4 illustrates a filter arrangement with a pleated non-woven material 1,
the
pleating, i.e the folding of the non-woven material, being roughly outlined by
a lateral
dashed line. The pleated non-woven material 1 is fixed in a frame 2, which has
lengthwise sides 3 and narrow sides 4, and consists of the same plastic
material as the
non-woven material 1 so that only pure-grade plastic material has to be
handled
during waste disposal.
The non-woven pleated layer is located in a flat filter box with pleat heights
ranging
from 10 mm to 100 mm. Preferably, the fibers of the non-woven layer are curled
and
random on the flow-in side, and are placed in substantially lengthwise
alignment on
the flow-off side. The structure should be such that an initial pressure loss
is less than
50 Pa at a velocity of flow through the filter arrangement of less than 250
m3/min/m2.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2016-07-11
Letter Sent 2015-07-10
Grant by Issuance 2006-07-18
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-07-17
Inactive: Final fee received 2006-05-05
Pre-grant 2006-05-05
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-12-19
Letter Sent 2005-12-19
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-12-19
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-09-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-07-22
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-02-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-01-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-07-07
Letter Sent 2002-01-11
Request for Examination Received 2001-11-30
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-11-30
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-11-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-11-30
Classification Modified 1999-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-03-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-03-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-03-15
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 1999-03-02
Application Received - PCT 1999-02-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1998-01-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2006-05-02

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IREMA-FILTER GMBH
Past Owners on Record
REINHARD JUNG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 1999-03-24 1 6
Claims 1999-01-07 2 46
Abstract 1999-01-07 1 16
Description 1999-01-07 9 307
Drawings 1999-01-07 1 22
Description 2005-01-05 8 306
Claims 2005-01-05 2 71
Drawings 2005-01-05 1 20
Claims 2005-07-21 2 71
Representative drawing 2006-06-27 1 7
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1999-03-10 1 111
Notice of National Entry 1999-03-01 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-03-01 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2002-01-10 1 178
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-12-18 1 161
Maintenance Fee Notice 2015-08-20 1 170
PCT 1999-01-07 13 467
Correspondence 2006-05-04 1 32