Language selection

Search

Patent 2268496 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2268496
(54) English Title: PURIFICATION OF ZINC MATERIALS
(54) French Title: PURIFICATION DE MATIERES ZINCIQUES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22B 19/02 (2006.01)
  • C01G 45/02 (2006.01)
  • C01G 45/10 (2006.01)
  • C22B 03/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FERRON, CESAR J. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • 1518611 ONTARIO INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • 1518611 ONTARIO INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1999-04-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-10-09
Examination requested: 2004-04-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


Disclosed herein is a process for removing at least a portion of a manganese
constituent
from a zinc-bearing material, comprising the step of subjecting the material
to a first oxidation
mixture of SO2 and oxygen, at conditions sufficient to oxidize the manganese
constituent.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A process for removing al least a portion of a manganese constituent from a
zinc-bearing
material, comprising the step of subjecting said material to a first oxidation
mixture of
SO2 and oxygen, at conditions sufficient to oxidize said manganese
constituent.
2. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein the material is maintained al a pH
sufficient to
precipitate manganese while minimizing precipitation of said zinc constituent.
3. A process as defined in claim 2 wherein said pH is between about 3 and
about 5.
4. A process as defined in claim 3 wherein said pH is between 3 and 4.
5. A process as defined in claim 4 wherein said pH is 3.
6. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said oxygen is in the form of O2.
7. A process as defined in claim 6 wherein said oxidation mixture includes
Air,
8. A process as defined in claim 7 wherein steps (a) and (c) occur at a
temperature ranging
from about 40 to about 80°C.
9. A process as defined in claim 8 wherein steps (a) and (c) occur at a
temperature ranging
from 50 to 80°C.
10. A process as defined in claim 9 wherein steps (a) and (c) occur at a
temperature ranging
from 58 to 78°C.
11. A process as defined in claim 10 wherein steps (a) and (c) occur at about
70°C.
-6-

12. A process as defined in claim 10 wherein steps (a) and (c) occur at about
60°C.
13. A process as defined in claim 6 wherein said SO2 is at a concentration
from 0.5% to 10%,
with the balance O2 gas.
14. A process as defined in claim 13 wherein said SO2 is at a concentration
from 1 to 8%.
15. A process as defined in claim 14 wherein SO2 is at a concentration from 2
to 3%
16. A process as defined in claim 7 wherein SO2 is at a concentration from
0.1% to 2%, with
the balance being Air.
17. A process as defined in claim 16 wherein said SO2 is at a concentration
from 0.2 to 1.4%.
18. A process as defined in claim 17 wherein SO2 is at a concentration from
0.4 to 0.6%.
19. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said zinc bearing material is a
leach solution.
20. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said zinc material is an
electrolyte solution.
-7-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


04/09/99 FRI 17:04 FAX 705 652 6074 GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES (~I003
BACKCrROUND OF THE ThTVENT10N
1, FIELD OF THE ~TTVENT1;ON
The present invention relates to the pwification of zino-bearing materials,
more
particularly but not necessarily exclusively to zinc-bearing aqueous
solutions.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
Some zinc (Zn) ores, for example sphalerite, contain high levels of manganese
(Mn) that
cannot be separated using conventional mineral processing techniques, since
the Mn is present in
the crystal lattice. When Zn sulphides containing Mn impurities are roasted
and then leached,
they can, in some cases, produce leach solutions or electrolyte solutions
containing unreasonably
high levels of Mn.
Although some relatively small amounts of Mn are generally acceptable iz~ a Zn
electrolyte, for example, excessive quantities can create problems, since the
Mn is oxidized at the
anode in the form of Mn0 2, some of which falls at the bottom of the cell and
must be periodically
removed. Crreater concentrations of MnOZ can lead to significant reductions in
electrolytic
eff ciency,
It is generally known in the prior art that precipitating zinc and manganese
together, using
sodium carbonate or lime as naturalizing agent, can be carried out at
70°C and at pH values
between 5 and 7, However, in this case, zinc begins to precipitate before
manganese and
therefore most of the zinc would be precipitated with manganese which is
obviously not
acceptable, as shown in figure 1.
Another solution proposed by the prior art is to oxidize MnZ' to Mn~' so that
lvlnOz can
be removed by precipitation at a pH whcz'e ZnZ'" is soluble. Air and oxygen
gas are typically used
as oxidants in this case but they are generally uneconomically slow. Peroxide
or stronger
CA 02268496 1999-04-09

04/09/99 FRI 17:05 FAX 705 852 8074 GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES ~ pp4
oxidants, such as Caro's acid or ozone, are in many cases too expensive.
US Patent 2,816,819 to Wallis et al. discloses a system which uses S02/A.ir to
precipitate
iron from a cobalt- or a nickel-bearing solution. Canadian Patent 935,650
discloses a technique by
which a mixture of SOZIAir is used to precipitate a number of impurities from
a cobalt or a. nickel
solution. However, neither reference is concerned with techniques for reducing
impurities from
Zn-bearing materials.
Xt is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method to
remove at least a
portion of Mn from Zn-bearing materials.
SCY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly stated, the invention involves a process for removing at least a
portion of a
manganese constituent from a zino-bearing material, comprising the step of
subjecting the
material to mixture of SO,, and oxygen, at conditions sufficient to oxidize
the manganese
constituent.
Preferably, the material is maintained at a pH sufficient to precipitate
manganese while
minimizing precipitation of the zinc constituent.
BRIEF DESCR7rTION OF THE DItA'1~VINGS
Several preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described,
by way of
example only, with reference to the appended drawing in which:
Fibure 1 is a plot of precipitation for Mn and Zn according to pH;
Figure 1 is a plot of precipitation using SOz/OZ mixture as an oxidant;
-2-
CA 02268496 1999-04-09

04/09/,99 FRI 17:05 FAX 705 852 8074 GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES f~005
DESC~tIPTION OF THE P~tEFERRED EME30D1MENTS
Briefly stated, the invention involves a process for removing at least a
portion of a
manganese constituent from a zinc-bearing material, comprising the step of
subjecting the
material to mixture of SOZ and oxygen, at conditions sufficient to oxidize the
manganese
comtituent.
Preferably, the material is maintained at a pI~ sufficient to precipitate
manganese while
minimizing precipitation of the zinc constituent.
Preferably, the process is carried out at a pH between about 3 and about 5,
more
preferably between 3 and 4. Still more preferably, the pH is 3.
If the p~ is higher than 5, for example up to 7, at least some residual Zn may
be
precipitated with the Mn. The hi;her the pH in this range, the greater the
quantity of Zn being
precipitated with Mn. In this case, it may be feasible either to process the
Mn subsequently with
the residual Zn in place or alternatively to subject the co-precipitate to a
mildly acidic solution
(such as at a pH of 3 to 4) to re-dissolve the residual zinc.
The pH limit of 4 is significant because, as the following examples
illustrate, residual Zn
has been found to appear in the precipitate at a pH value above 4 while there
appears to be no Zn
co-precipitate at pI-i values below 4. Therefore, it may be desirable, in some
circumstances, to
maintain the reaction at the lower end of the pH range, that is in the
vicinity of pH 3 in order to
minimize the likelihood of a Zn co-precipitate. This route may also be
enhanced by maintaining a
distribution of nucleation sites in the reaction, such as MnOz crystals.
The oxygen may be in the form of Oz or air or a mixture of both.
Preferably, the process occurs at a temperature ranging from about 40 to about
80°C,
.,
_,_
CA 02268496 1999-04-09

-. 04/09/99 FRI 17:08 FAX 705 852 6074 GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES f~ppg
more preferably at a temperature ranging from 50 to 80°C, still more
preferably at a temperature
ranging from SS to 78°C. For example, the process may be carried out at
about 70°C or,
alternatively, at abom 60°C.
It may also be desirable, in some cases, to raise the temperature above
80°C, for example
to an upper limit of about 130°C or higher in order to increase the
reaction kinetics of the process,
though this would need to be done under pressure, depending on the chosen
temperature. For
example, a temperature of 130°C would require a pressure of about 50
psi.
Preferably, in the case where the oxygen is present in the form of O~ gas, the
S02 is at a
concentration from about 0.5% to 10%, with the balance Oz gas, more preferably
from 1 to 8%,
still more preferably at a concentration from 2 to 3%.
In the case where the oxygen is present in air, the SO, is preferably ac a
concentration
ranging from about 0.1% to 2%, with the balance being Air, mere preferably
from about 0.2 to
1.4%, still more preferably from about 0.4 to 0.6%. For example, the
concentration may be about
0.5%.
The zinc material may be in a number of forms including an aqueous solution,
such as a
leach solution or an electrolyte solution.
The present process is beneficial in that it makes use of a relatively
inexpensive and
plentiful oxidant, a gas mixtwe of OZ/S02, or alternatively Air/SOz, or still
alternatively 100%
pure Air can be used together with equivalent amounts of 502, preferably added
as S02 in a
gaseous or liquid form, or added as a constituent in a solution containing,
for example, sodium
metabisulphite, ammonium metabisulphite, potassium metabisulphite or other
suitable forms of
metabisulphite.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the
following
-4-
CA 02268496 1999-04-09

04/09/99 FRI 17:08 FAX 705 852 8074 GASTLE AND ASSOCIATES ~ pp7
Examples which are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not
intended to limit the
scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
A, solution containing 5 g/~. Mn as MnSOa was sparged with a mixture of S02
and OZ at
different pH levels. The amount of Mn removed at each pH is shown in figure 2.
A comparison can be made between the precipitation of pH's of manganese
oxidized with
S0~10z as shown in figure 2 with the precipitation of zinc as shown in figure
1. The Mn is
removed from solution at pH levels ranging from about 3 to 5, However, in the
region from
about 3 to 4, the Mn is removed from solution while the Zn is soluble and
therefore remains in
solution.
LXAMpLE 2
A solution containing 18 g~. Mn as MnSOd was sparged at 60°C and at a
pH of 6.5 with
SOz/OZ mixtures containing 2% (v/v) SO2. After one hour, 25% of the manganese
had
precipitated. After 2 hours, 57% of the Mn had precipitated and after 4 hours,
99.5% of the Mn
had precipitated.
-5-
CA 02268496 1999-04-09

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2009-04-09
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2009-04-09
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2008-04-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-04-09
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-10-17
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-10-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-09-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-09-01
Letter Sent 2004-05-06
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-04-07
Request for Examination Received 2004-04-07
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2004-04-07
Letter Sent 2002-11-04
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-09-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-10-09
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-10-08
Letter Sent 2000-01-07
Inactive: Single transfer 1999-12-14
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-05-28
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1999-05-18
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1999-05-12
Application Received - Regular National 1999-05-11

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2008-04-09

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-04-10

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
1518611 ONTARIO INC.
Past Owners on Record
CESAR J. FERRON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2000-10-02 1 6
Drawings 1999-04-08 1 17
Abstract 1999-04-08 1 11
Description 1999-04-08 5 179
Claims 1999-04-08 2 50
Filing Certificate (English) 1999-05-11 1 165
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2000-01-06 1 115
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-12-11 1 112
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-11-03 1 109
Reminder - Request for Examination 2003-12-09 1 123
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2004-05-05 1 176
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2008-06-03 1 173
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2008-08-06 1 165
Correspondence 1999-05-17 1 31
Fees 2003-03-20 1 50
Fees 2002-03-06 1 60
Fees 2001-03-20 1 50
Fees 2004-04-06 1 44
Fees 2005-03-23 1 45
Fees 2006-03-30 1 46
Fees 2007-04-09 1 47